Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 03ABUJA1330, NIGERIA "ENGAGING ISLAM IN NIGERIA: THE TWO -

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03ABUJA1330.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
03ABUJA1330 2003-08-05 13:13 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Abuja
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 ABUJA 001330 
 
SIPDIS 
 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
 
STATE FOR IIP/SC AND IPI, IIP/T/ES, AF/PDPA IIP/G/AF, 
INFO AF, AF/RSA, AF/W, NEA/PPD 
LAGOS FOR PAS 
 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KPAO PREL SCUL OIIP NI
SUBJECT: NIGERIA "ENGAGING ISLAM IN NIGERIA: THE TWO - 
DAY KANO CONFERENCE" - - an analysis 
 
REF:  Abuja 
 
 
1. (SBU) Summary: In late January an unprecedented 
forum initiated by the Emir of Kano brought together 
Embassy officials, American scholars, and Moslem 
leaders from northern Nigeria to explore perceptions 
of the US and Islam, U.S. Middle East Policy, the 
Global War on Terrorism, and economic development in 
Northern Nigeria. The conference was a frank exchange 
that revealed a wide gap in perspective between the 
American and Nigerian attendees.  Many of the 
Nigerians espoused "clash of culture" and conspiracy 
theories, with the United States being Islam's main 
antagonist. The bedrock of their indictment was 
perceived U.S. bias in the Israeli-Palestinian 
conflict. This perception colored every aspect of 
their view of U.S. policy from Afghanistan to West 
Africa. While no minds were changed during the 
meeting, the dialogue helped to loosen positions 
somewhat and also served to show our concern about how 
we are perceived in Northern Nigeria.  The dialogue 
has led to requests for more conferences.  End 
Summary. 
 
 
2. (SBU) The impetus for this conference was the April 
2002 visit to the U.S. by the Emir of Kano who was 
greatly concerned about the negative image of Nigeria. 
During the conference's preparatory stages the focus 
shifted. Instead of focusing on American perceptions 
of Nigeria, we decided to seek the Emir's agreement to 
change the focus of the conference to how Northern 
Nigeria sees the United States.  This adjustment would 
allow us to advance a key USG and Mission objective -- 
engaging Muslim opinion-makers on their home turf. The 
Emir and his lieutenants agreed to this reorientation 
and offered to host the conference in Kano for U.S. 
and Nigerian policymakers and opinion leaders. 
 
 
----------------- 
Clash of Cultures 
----------------- 
3. (SBU) Giving the initial presentation of the 
conference, Dr. Ibrahim Suleiman of Ahmadu Bello 
University set the tone for an energetic exchange by 
claiming that a clash of cultures was inevitable. He 
argued that Islam has been a wholly beneficial 
development in West Africa while Christianity, 
modernity and globalization were negative influences. 
He asserted that the United State had implicitly 
declared war on Islam. Throughout the conference, 
Suleiman and others cited President Bush's description 
of the Global War on Terrorism as a "crusade," as 
evidence that America was warring against their 
religion. 
 
 
4. (SBU) Embassy staff debunked the notion of a war on 
Islam as well as the thesis that western values and 
globalization were inimical to the "African 
Personality." Dr. Godlas also attempted to refute 
Suleiman's position. Speaking as an American Muslim 
and a religious scholar, he stated that American 
"modernism" and Islam have many common themes; thus a 
cultural collision was avoidable but necessitated 
better understanding and a willingness to transcend 
stereotypes. 
 
 
------------------ 
Middle East Policy 
------------------ 
5. (SBU) Middle East Policy: Throughout the session, 
the Nigerian interlocutors pointed to the Israeli- 
Palestinian question as the litmus test of U.S. view 
toward their religion. As long as the U.S. was seen as 
uncritically supportive of Israel, the U.S. would have 
problems in the Moslem world. Additionally, they 
claimed that Islamic countries could not "trust" the 
United States.  They complained the U.S. once 
supported Iraq but was now its mortal enemy.  One 
person went as far as accusing the U.S. of preparing 
to attack Saudi Arabia because it disagreed with U.S. 
on Iraq. 
 
 
6. (SBU) Nabeel Khoury gave a solid presentation 
outlining the Administration's "Roadmap for Peace in 
Middle Eastern."  While the Nigerians commended U.S. 
support for a Palestinian state, they criticized our 
insistence on a new Palestinian leadership.  They also 
voiced skepticism about whether we would use our 
assistance as leverage to pressure Isreal to be more 
flexible. 
 
 
----------------------- 
Global War on Terrorism 
----------------------- 
 
 
7. (SBU) Most participants deplored terrorism and 
condemned the September 11 attacks. However, they 
viewed the U.S. war on terrorism -- symbolized by 
military intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq -- as 
anti-Islamic. Some said North Korea represented more 
of a threat but was being handled with kid gloves 
because it was not Islamic and was a nuclear state. A 
few claimed that the Global War on Terrorism was a 
ruse to spur the U.S. economy by attacking Islamic 
states with oil reserves. 
 
 
8. (SBU) All the Nigerians claimed that using military 
means to combat terrorism would prove ineffective.  To 
get to the root of the tension, the U.S. has to become 
an impartial arbiter in the Isreali-Palestinian 
conflict. 
 
 
------------------------------------------ 
U.S. Foreign Policy - Morality in Question 
------------------------------------------ 
9. (SBU) The Nigerian interlocutor contended that U.S. 
foreign policy failed to live up to its democratic and 
human rights underpinnings.  They claimed the U.S. 
supported unpopular regimes in the Middle East because 
of oil.  They also claimed that the U.S. policy in 
Africa has been checkered by indifference and racial 
prejudice. 
 
 
10. (SBU) Ambassador Jeter asked how U.S. support for 
the conflict in Bosnia could be reconciled with the 
conclusion that the U.S. was anti-Islamic.  He also 
pointed out that Nigerian Moslems often criticized the 
U.S. but were reluctant to upbraid Islamic states. 
For instance, they were silent on Sudanese government 
mistreatment of southern Sudanese Christians.  The 
Nigerians argued that the Sudan was a "political" 
battle over land and resources, not a religious war. 
They were told that the same description could also be 
applied to the Israeli-Palestinian feud. 
 
 
------------------ 
Random Perceptions 
------------------ 
 
 
11. (SBU) 
 
 
--Nigerian Participants presented their perceptions of 
the U.S. Unfortunately, a current of anti-Semitism ran 
through many comments. 
 
 
--The Jewish lobby has undue influence on USG policy, 
including Middle East policy. In the United States no 
candidate for any national, state or local officer can 
be elected without the support of the all-powerful 
Jewish lobby, said one participant. 
 
 
--Jews were responsible for the September 11 terrorist 
attacks; Jews were told to stay at home on that day. 
 
 
--September 11 attacks were responsible for the Jos 
unrest (though that unrest took place on September 7). 
 
 
----------------------- 
Next Steps and Comments 
----------------------- 
 
 
12. (SBU) There are two ways to view the conference. 
One is pessimistic; the other is hopeful.  The gulf 
between American and Nigerian Muslim perspectives of 
the world is vast.  The Nigerian participants 
generally represented the mainstream thought in the 
Northern Nigerian community.  Unfortunately, they 
shared a strong inclination for believing the worst 
about America.  Theirs was a selective interpretation 
of history - they tended to give extra significance to 
things they felt showed America's anti-Islamic bias. 
Thus, the inordinate focus on President Bush's use of 
the word "crusade." At times, this propensity served 
to materially distance their understanding of U.S. 
actions and intentions.  For example, most believed 
the U.S. sided with the French and British during the 
1956 Suez crisis.  Conversely, they gave short to 
shrift to action that showed the United States has 
acted even-handedly. 
 
 
13. (SBU) Their collective analysis of the United 
States lacked sufficient objectivity.  Their views 
were the product of a long term diet of anti-American 
disseminations and discussions.  They want to believe 
the United States is an adversary.  Having such a 
powerful adversary provided a convenient excuse for 
many of the ills in their society.  At another level, 
having a strong enemy also helps to validate their 
sense of self-worth. (We must be a potent force or 
else the U.S. would not bother).  In short, having an 
omnipotent adversary fits nicely into their political 
and religious cosmology and helps explain negative 
socio-economic trends in Northern Nigeria.  However, 
this somber interpretation is not insuperable.  Behind 
the rhetoric is a certain respect for America and what 
it stands for.  Whether they say it or not, they wish 
Nigeria could be more like America than it is. Thus, 
there is certain ambivalence in their view of the U.S. 
They mistrust but do not hate us.  They want to be 
like us and want to like us but we must first show 
that we like them. 
 
 
14. (SBU) Consequently, we can use this begrudging 
admiration of the United States to help influence 
perceptions in a more positive way.  There are two 
major steps that can be taken.  Our active engagement 
in resolving Israeli-Palestinian crises is sine qua 
non.  While the road map to peace was greeted coolly 
by the Nigerians, they will warm if progress is noted. 
Second, we need to be more active in Northern Nigeria. 
We need to elevate our official presence and 
developmental assistance particular in agriculture and 
education.  The more we have a benign material effect 
in their daily lives, the more we undermine 
perceptions of U.S. indifference. 
 
 
15 (SBU) In the final analysis, the conference was a 
productive opportunity to exchange views on key 
foreign policy issues as well as to discuss 
perceptions of each other.  The meeting did not change 
minds, but it engendered better understanding on some 
issues.  Equally important, the conference was well 
received. Participants have requested future 
conferences on Sharia in Nigeria, the bilateral 
relationship, and West Africa regional issues.  In 
March, U.S. speakers Dr. Gwendolyn Mikell also invited 
the Ciroma of Kano to Washington to speak to the 
Council on Foreign Relations and to Chicago to speak 
to the Third World Scholars Conference. 
 
 
Governor of Katsina has agreed to any offer of a 
similar conference in Katsina. 
 
 
16 (U) This cable was delayed in transmission. 
 
 
LIBERI