Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 03HOCHIMINHCITY500, VIETNAM ISSUES TEXTILE QUOTA ALLOCATION GUIDELINES

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03HOCHIMINHCITY500.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
03HOCHIMINHCITY500 2003-06-06 18:36 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HO CHI MINH CITY 000500 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV AND EB/TPP/ABT/BTT BOYNTON 
STATE ALSO PASS USTR BRYAN/SPOONER/MILLER/CLATANOFF 
USDOC FOR 6500 AND 4430/MAC/AP/OPB/VLC/HPPHO 
USDOC ALSO PASS OTEXA LEONARD/FOOTE/MARTELLO 
CUSTOMS FOR RICHARD CRICHTON 
LABOR FOR ANA VALDES 
 
E. O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON ETRD KTEX VM
SUBJECT: VIETNAM ISSUES TEXTILE QUOTA ALLOCATION GUIDELINES 
 
REF:  HCMC 297 
 
1.  (SBU) SUMMARY:  The GVN has announced quota allocation 
criteria for textile and garment exports to the U.S.  Sixty- 
five to seventy percent of quota will be allocated based on 
past performance over the period of calendar year 2002 and the 
first quarter of 2003.  The remainder will be issued to new 
companies and firms meeting a range of other criteria.  AMCHAM 
and others had lobbied strongly for quota to go first to past 
performance.  The allocation of the performance-based quota 
should be a relatively transparent process, but criteria for 
the remainder has yet to be clarified.  Many buyers and 
producers worry that this could allow quota to be steered to 
politically connected firms.  The biggest problem, however, is 
that contrary to the circular itself, which calls for 80% of 
performance quota to be allocated by the end of May, no such 
allocation has yet occurred. Producers and buyers are becoming 
increasingly nervous that as all companies, whether eligible 
for performance-based quota or not, continue to ship, available 
quota shrinks every day.  Producers still argue, however, that 
quota is still a competitive advantage over China.  End 
Summary. 
 
Quota Criteria allocates 65-70% to Past Performance 
--------------------------------------------- ------ 
 
2.  (U) In a joint circular issued by the Ministries of Trade, 
Planning and Investment, and Industry, the GVN spelled out 
guidance for quota allocation for export of textile and apparel 
to the U.S. market.  The circular, dated May 27 and released a 
few days later, covers quota allocation for the period from May 
1 to December 31, 2003. 
 
3.  (U) Depending on quota category, 65-70% of available quota 
will be allocated based on past performance, with past 
performance defined as shipments to the U.S. market during 
calendar year 2002 and the first quarter of 2003.  Most of the 
remaining quota (from 23-28%, again depending on category) will 
be allocated according to a variety of criteria: 
 
--To enterprises with high production and export capacity, but 
which just began to export in late 2002 or early this year. 
 
--To enterprises which have no "past performance" record of 
export, but which now have export contracts which can be filled 
with current capacity.  "Priority [will be] given to 
enterprises that have invested in modern equipment and 
technology to produce textile and apparel products of high 
quality for export." 
 
--Three percent in this category will be reserved for companies 
that have signed contracts directly with U.S. importers and 
distributors. 
 
Ministry of Trade officials explained that they decided to 
establish a range on quota distribution to allow them the 
flexibility to fine tune the system as they are implementing 
it. 
 
4.  (U) The remaining 7 percent of quota will be reserved for 
enterprises using "significant" amounts of materials and 
fabrics made in Vietnam or for enterprises located in 
"economically difficult areas" which have production capacity 
and export contracts. 
 
 
Schedule is Already Slipping 
---------------------------- 
 
5.  (U) The circular directs that the quota be allocated 
according to a schedule that has already slipped.  Eighty 
percent of performance-based quota for companies that had 
already properly documented past performance was to have been 
issued by the end of May.  This has yet to occur.  Eighty 
percent of performance-based quota for other companies and 
quota based on the other criteria is to be issued by the end of 
June.  According to Ministry of Trade officials, they plan to 
allocate the remaining 20% of the quota once the Visa 
Certification system is in place. 
6.  (SBU) The circular prohibits quota from being transferred 
or sold between companies and notes that companies that do not 
utilize all their quota must surrender the excess quota in 
writing by October 1 to qualify for the same quota level next 
year.  Visas will be required for shipments after July 1. NOTE: 
Privately, MOT officials has expressed their concern about the 
task of administering the quota system, especially in light of 
the minimal prep time they have had to get it up and running. 
We're not surprised that they are running behind schedule but 
believe that they are making a sincere effort in the face of 
intense pressure and outside scrutiny. 
 
The Devil is in the Details 
--------------------------- 
7.  (SBU) Several foreign buyers and producers have told 
econoff that they believe the performance-based quota will be 
allocated in a relatively fair and transparent manner, but they 
are much more pessimistic about the allocation of the quota 
based on the other criteria.  Rumors have already started to 
circulate that one Jaguar-driving son of the key MOT official 
responsible for quota is an avenue for obtaining quota. 
Although the circular states that allocation shall be "carried 
out in a transparent, reasonable manner" the devil is in the 
details and evidently buyers and producers here believe in the 
devil.  For all of the efforts at transparency - the circular 
as well as export data for the month of May appears on the 
Ministry of Trade website, and the ministries involved 
solicited comments from buyers and producers - it is far from 
clear how the non-performance quota will be allocated. Although 
Ministry of Trade officials verbally explained to us their 
intended process and assured us of their intent to be as 
transparent and as fair as possible, the published criteria are 
vague and could create a situation where decisions are made on 
a case-by-case basis, allowing for outside pressure to be 
brought to bear on MOT.  And even though quota is not to be 
sold or transferred, some producers have told econoff that they 
are already looking for quota from companies that might have a 
surplus. 
 
8.  (SBU) For example, 7% of the quota is reserved for 
companies using local materials or located in "economically 
difficult areas," but the circular did not define "economically 
difficult areas," nor did it specify local content criteria. 
(Note:  We assume that MOT will use the GVN's list of 
economically depressed or underdeveloped regions as established 
by the Ministry of Planning and Investment under its poverty 
alleviation program.)    MOT has assured us they are working on 
the criteria and procedures to evaluate the applications of new 
enterprises seeking quota or those that just began shipping at 
the end of last year, but was unable to provide details or a 
firm implementation date.    One sweater manufacturer which has 
invested $5 million in a plant in Ho Chi Minh City told econoff 
that although his company had been registered here for about 
two years, exports to the U.S. have so far been relatively 
small, because of the time it took to get the factory up and 
running and to hire and train his staff.  The criteria as 
issued do not give him any hint of whether or how he will get 
quota. 
 
Picking Favorites 
----------------- 
 
9.  (SBU) Buyers, producers and even Vietnamese officials point 
out that this lack of clarity will help connected firms get the 
quota they need to export.  Some of the criteria seem designed 
to benefit state-owned enterprises (SOEs) - such as the 
criteria which base some allocation on "capacity of production 
and export".  The guidance measures capacity in part as number 
of workers, machinery, etc, which SOEs have in abundance. 
AMCHAM, by contrast, had suggested that any additional quota be 
based on paid-in capital, which would have favored foreign- 
invested firms (Reftel).  SOEs are also more likely to locate 
in those economically difficult areas which will receive 
additional quota. 
 
10.  (SBU) All business sector interlocutors stressed, however, 
that the lack of clarity in assigning the non-performance quota 
would not simply benefit SOEs, but would benefit firms with 
strong political connections or those seeking to make them. 
Many producers stressed that some large private Vietnamese 
firms were very well connected and would have little problem 
obtaining the quota that they needed.  One Vietnamese private 
sector factory owner close to high-level officials told econoff 
weeks before this guidance was released he had absolutely no 
concerns about obtaining the quota that he needed. 
 
11.  (U) Small private firms were likely to do less well 
however.  Many of these firms have limited "past performance" 
and even fewer political connections.  One Hong Kong producer 
noted that many of these private firms worked as subcontractors 
for larger firms when producing for the U.S. market.  In such 
cases performance quota would accrue to the consignor, not to 
the subcontractor. 
 
12.  (SBU) According to one Vietnamese official, Korean firms 
also influenced the design of the allocation process.  A large 
group of foreign buyers and producers had been recommending 
through a joint AMCHAM committee that companies with past 
performance receive quota which at least matched past 
performance.  Koreans, many of whom recently opened factories 
and had little or no past performance argued for limiting quota 
based on past performance to allow for quota allocations to new 
firms.  According to this official, representations were made 
by the Korean Ambassador to Trade Minister Tuyen, and the Prime 
Minister of Korea made the same appeal in writing to the 
highest levels of the GVN.  Evidently, it worked.  However, we 
should note that several U.S. firms expressed exactly the same 
concern to us and are very pleased that MOT included provisions 
for new firms. 
 
Quota Disappearing by the Day 
----------------------------- 
 
13.  (U) A larger worry among foreign buyers and producers is 
the timing of the actual quota allocations, which have yet to 
occur.  MOT officials told us in late May that they intended to 
allocate quota by the end of May for those firms that had met 
the May 15 deadline for applications.  The circular in fact 
states that 80% of the performance quota will be allocated "by 
the end of May."  As of June 5, this had yet to occur, although 
firm hear that the allocation is coming "any day."  Quota 
covers the eight-month period from May 1 to the end of the 
year.  Without quota allocations, product continues to be 
shipped madly to the U.S.  Producers are worried that when 
quota is finally allocated, much of it will have already been 
used up - and with good reason.  According to the Ministry of 
Trade website (www.mot.gov.vn), as of June 3, nine of the 22 
categories have already shipped over 25% of the available quota 
for the rest of the year. (Note:  because the textile agreement 
took effect on May 1 this year, only two-thirds of the total 
annual quota is available in each category for the period May 1 
- December 31, 2003.)    In the two largest categories 338/339 
22% of the available quota has already been shipped and 
category 347/348 has already shipped 30% of the available 
quota. 
 
14.  (SBU) Comment:  Even though the MOT circular instructions 
lacked adequate detail (not uncommon), and despite the delay in 
quota allocation, buyers and producers are still bullish on 
Vietnam.  They are pleased the circular calls for a sizable 
portion of quota to be allocated based on past performance. 
Vietnam's competitive advantage is still quota, one producer 
told econoff.  He estimated that production costs are still 15% 
higher than China and operating costs are 20% higher, but quota 
is still cheaper than in China.  With most of it free here for 
past producers, he would somehow acquire the rest of what he 
needed from the allocation process or, although technically 
illegal, by buying surplus from other producers.  The biggest 
problem now is getting quota allocations issued before even 
more available quota is used up. 
 
YAMAUCHI