Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 03OTTAWA723, DISTANT NEIGHBORS, NORTHERN STYLE: CANADIAN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03OTTAWA723.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
03OTTAWA723 2003-03-14 21:45 2011-04-28 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Ottawa
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000723 
 
SIPDIS 
 
HOMELAND SECURITY FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KPAO KPLS CA
SUBJECT:  DISTANT NEIGHBORS, NORTHERN STYLE: CANADIAN 
OPINION OF THE U.S. 
 
1. Summary and Conclusion. International debate on the war 
on terrorism and impending war in Iraq has raised serious 
concern about "What the World Thinks" about the United 
States and its foreign policies.  This is as true for Canada 
as for the rest of the world.  Canada is our largest trading 
partner; shares our longest land border; and has been a 
close ally in two world wars, the Cold War and in the war on 
terrorism.  Implementation of new security measures post 9- 
11, such as NSEERS and visa requirements for Commonwealth 
Landed Immigrants in Canada, as well as perennial bilateral 
trade issues, have given us additional reason to ask how 
Canadians perceive us. 
 
2. This is the first in a series of cables that attempts to 
assess Canadian opinion of the U.S. and public support in 
Canada for U.S. policies.  This report reviews the findings 
of three recent, publicly released Canadian public opinion 
polls.  These polls indicate that we still enjoy a reservoir 
of good will with most Canadians.  But the polls also 
indicate that the international environment post 9-11 has 
drawn heavily on that good will.  The U.S. has a broad and 
complex policy agenda in which Canadian opinion matters. 
The opinion polling results suggest that, as we implement 
our policy agenda, we will need to find ways effectively to 
shore up public support from our nearest neighbors.  End 
Summary and Conclusion. 
 
IRAQ: CANADIAN VIEWS ARE MIXED BUT GENERALLY SUPPORT 
MILITARY ACTION ONLY IF SANCTIONED BY THE UN. 
 
3. The most recent publicly released national poll was 
conducted by the firm Ipsos-Reid on February 28 2003.  It 
finds a slim majority (51 percent) of Canadians saying that 
the UN Security Council has enough evidence to authorize 
military action against Iraq.  This is a small but 
significant shift from a poll conducted 10 days earlier in 
which 52 percent of Canadians said that there was not enough 
evidence to authorize an attack. 
 
4. This does not mean that a majority of Canadians support 
the U.S. position on Iraq.  62 per cent of Canadians in the 
Feb 28 survey continue to believe that Canada should support 
more time for UN inspectors in Iraq to complete their 
mission.  62 percent of Canadians also say that Canada 
should provide assistance for military action in Iraq only 
if the UN decides military action is required. 
 
5. Only 32 percent of Canadians feel Canada should support 
U.S. and U.K. calls for immediate military action to remove 
Saddam Hussein from power.  Even fewer - 18 percent - say 
that Canada should provide military assistance if the U.S. 
decides that military action is required in Iraq without UN 
authorization.  Another 18 percent of Canadians feel that 
Canada should provide no military assistance for any action 
in Iraq, even if authorized by the UN. 
 
REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN CANADIAN PERCEPTIONS 
 
6. Canada's regions exhibit differing patterns of support 
for the U.S. position on Iraq.  The view that the UN 
Security Council now has enough evidence to authorize 
military action against Iraq is shared by at least half of 
the residents in each region except in Quebec, where only 34 
percent of Canadians hold this view.  When Quebec is removed 
from the national polling, agreement among Canadians rises 
to 57 percent. 
 
7. Of all Canadians, Albertans exhibit the highest level of 
support; 70 percent believe the UN has sufficient evidence 
to authorize military action.  Other western Canadians, 
however, are more strongly opposed.  In Saskatchewan and 
Manitoba, 67 percent (up from 53 percent in the earlier 
poll) now say that Canada should support more time for UN 
inspectors.  Only 28 percent (down from 42 percent in the 
earlier poll) say that Canada should support the U.S./U.K. 
position on the need for military action in Iraq. 
 
A BASELINE OF CANADIAN OPINION OF THE U.S. - THE PEW CENTER 
STUDY. 
 
8. The Pew Center Study, published at the end of 2002, has 
been widely discussed in U.S. and foreign media, including 
the media in Canada.  The study received relatively little 
attention on a country-by-country basis, however.  The 
Study, conducted in July 2002, shows that Canadians hold 
positive attitudes about the U.S.  At 72 percent favorable, 
Canadians held a more positive image of the U.S. than almost 
any other country (among traditional allies, only the U.K. 
was more positive at 75 percent).  That rating by Canadians 
was up one percentage point, from 71 percent, in the 
previous year's survey. 
 
9. The Pew Center Study also indicates that Canadians and 
Americans are alike in many of their national perceptions. 
They express remarkably similar satisfaction with their own 
lives.  67 percent of Canadians and 64 per cent of Americans 
are satisfied with their personal lives, far higher levels 
of satisfaction than in other industrialized western 
nations.  Canadians and Americans also express similar views 
of "progress" in their countries over the past five years 
(51 percent among Americans, 48 percent among Canadians). 
And they express similar levels of "optimism" about the 
future (61 per cent among Americans and 54 per cent among 
Canadians).  Americans and Canadians are significantly more 
optimistic about the future than are western Europeans. 
 
10. Yet there are significant differences in American and 
Canadian perceptions of specific issue areas on the world 
scene.  50 percent of Americans identify terrorism as a 
"very big" problem; only 19 percent of Canadians expressed 
that concern.  The Pew Study found a duality of opinion 
among the U.S.' closest allies in their support for the war 
against terrorism.  Canadian opinion fits that pattern: 68 
per cent of Canadians supported the U.S. led war on 
terrorism; but only 25 percent of Canadians believed that 
U.S. foreign policy "considers others" when making 
international policy decisions, including decisions about 
countering international terrorism. 
 
11. Canadians are critical of the U.S. in the economic 
sphere.  68 percent of Canadians believe that the U.S. does 
"too little to solve problems related to the gap between 
rich and poor countries." On issues of pollution and the 
environment, nearly twice as many Canadians as Americans are 
"worried" (44 per cent vs. 23 per cent).  While 50 percent 
of Canadians like "American ideas about democracy," 56 
percent of Canadians dislike "American ideas about business 
practices." 
 
12. Canadians have mixed views of U.S. cultural influence 
but they are far less critical than Europeans.  54 per cent 
of Canadians expressed the sentiment that the "spread of 
American ideas and customs" was bad.  This compares with 71 
percent in France, 67 percent in Germany and 68 percent in 
Russia.  Yet 77 percent of Canadians "like" American popular 
culture.  This compares with 66 percent in France and 
Germany and only 42 percent in Russia. 
 
13. Among western countries, only in Canada does a strong 
majority (77 per cent) express a positive view of 
immigration.  Among other major industrial countries, 
Americans show the next highest level of support for 
immigration; but at 49 percent, American support for 
immigration is far lower than Canadian. 
 
CANADIAN OPINION UPDATE: A NEGATIVE SHIFT? 
 
14. The Pew Center in Canada was conducted by the Environics 
Research Group in July, 2002.  The same firm conducted a 
separate poll with a different set of respondents in 
February 2003.  The two polls were not designed to be 
strictly inter-comparable.  Nevertheless, the findings of 
the later poll may suggest a negative shift in Canadian 
perceptions of the U.S.  The overall Canadian attitude 
toward the U.S. remained favorable.  But at 62 percent, it 
was considerably lower than in August 2002. 
A majority of Quebecers - 54 per cent - for the first time 
held an unfavorable opinion of the U.S., a 20 percent drop 
since August 2002. 
 
15. The polling data from Quebec suggests that, despite the 
decline of separatism as a political issue, there is still a 
significant anglophone/francophone division of opinion on 
international issues.  This is particularly interesting as 
Quebecers often have been viewed as more pro-American than 
other Canadians - particularly in Ontario - because of wide 
support for free trade and American culture.  In another 
twist, the latest poll finds Canadians overall holding more 
positive views of both the U.K. and France than of the U.S. 
77 percent of Canadians hold a favorable view of the U.K. 
compared to 69 percent for France and 62 percent for the 
U.S.  The favorable rating for France in Quebec was 80 
percent compared with 62 percent for the U.K. and 40 percent 
for the U.S. 
 
16. COMMENT. These polling results indicate that Canadian 
perceptions of the U.S. are mixed and dynamic, and that they 
exhibit significant regional differences.  Future cables 
will attempt to assess more anecdotally the extent to which 
Canadian perceptions may reflect deeper sentiments in favor 
of peace and in favor of multi-lateral action; and the 
extent to which such sentiments may translate into "anti- 
American" feelings.  END COMMENT.  Cellucci