Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 97115 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ETRD EAGR ETTC EAID ECON EFIN ECIN EINV ELAB EAIR ENRG EPET EWWT ECPS EIND EMIN ELTN EC ETMIN EUC EZ ET ELECTIONS ENVR EU EUN EG EINT ER ECONOMICS ES EMS ENIV EEB EN ECE ECOSOC EK ENVIRONMENT EFIS EI EWT ENGRD ECPSN EXIM EIAD ERIN ECPC EDEV ENGY ECTRD EPA ESTH ECCT EINVECON ENGR ERTD EUR EAP EWWC ELTD EL EXIMOPIC EXTERNAL ETRDEC ESCAP ECO EGAD ELNT ECONOMIC ENV ETRN EIAR EUMEM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID EREL ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA ETCC ETRG ECONOMY EMED ETR ENERG EITC EFINOECD EURM EENG ERA EXPORT ENRD ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EGEN EBRD EVIN ETRAD ECOWAS EFTA ECONETRDBESPAR EGOVSY EPIN EID ECONENRG EDRC ESENV ETT EB ENER ELTNSNAR ECHEVARRIA ETRC EPIT EDUC ESA EFI ENRGY ESCI EE EAIDXMXAXBXFFR EETC ECIP EIAID EIVN EBEXP ESTN EING EGOV ETRA EPETEIND ELAN ETRDGK EAIDRW ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ENVI ELN EAG EPCS EPRT EPTED ETRB EUM EAIDS EFIC EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR ESF EIDN ELAM EDU EV EAIDAF ECN EDA EXBS EINTECPS ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EPREL EAC EINVEFIN ETA EAGER EINDIR ECA ECLAC ELAP EITI EUCOM ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID EARG ELDIN EINVKSCA ENNP EFINECONCS EFINTS ECCP ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEFIN EIB EURN ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM ETIO ELAINE EMN EATO EWTR EIPR EINVETC ETTD ETDR EIQ ECONCS EPPD ENRGIZ EISL ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO EUREM ENTG ERD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECUN EFND EPECO EAIRECONRP ERGR ETRDPGOV ECPN ENRGMO EPWR EET EAIS EAGRE EDUARDO EAGRRP EAIDPHUMPRELUG EICN ECONQH EVN EGHG ELBR EINF EAIDHO EENV ETEX ERNG ED
KMDR KPAO KPKO KJUS KCRM KGHG KFRD KWMN KDEM KTFN KHIV KGIC KIDE KSCA KNNP KHUM KIPR KSUM KISL KIRF KCOR KRCM KPAL KWBG KN KS KOMC KSEP KFLU KPWR KTIA KSEO KMPI KHLS KICC KSTH KMCA KVPR KPRM KE KU KZ KFLO KSAF KTIP KTEX KBCT KOCI KOLY KOR KAWC KACT KUNR KTDB KSTC KLIG KSKN KNN KCFE KCIP KGHA KHDP KPOW KUNC KDRL KV KPREL KCRS KPOL KRVC KRIM KGIT KWIR KT KIRC KOMO KRFD KUWAIT KG KFIN KSCI KTFIN KFTN KGOV KPRV KSAC KGIV KCRIM KPIR KSOC KBIO KW KGLB KMWN KPO KFSC KSEAO KSTCPL KSI KPRP KREC KFPC KUNH KCSA KMRS KNDP KR KICCPUR KPPAO KCSY KTBT KCIS KNEP KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KGCC KINR KPOP KMFO KENV KNAR KVIR KDRG KDMR KFCE KNAO KDEN KGCN KICA KIMMITT KMCC KLFU KMSG KSEC KUM KCUL KMNP KSMT KCOM KOMCSG KSPR KPMI KRAD KIND KCRP KAUST KWAWC KTER KCHG KRDP KPAS KITA KTSC KPAOPREL KWGB KIRP KJUST KMIG KLAB KTFR KSEI KSTT KAPO KSTS KLSO KWNN KPOA KHSA KNPP KPAONZ KBTS KWWW KY KJRE KPAOKMDRKE KCRCM KSCS KWMNCI KESO KWUN KPLS KIIP KEDEM KPAOY KRIF KGICKS KREF KTRD KFRDSOCIRO KTAO KJU KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KO KNEI KEMR KKIV KEAI KWAC KRCIM KWCI KFIU KWIC KCORR KOMS KNNO KPAI KBWG KTTB KTBD KTIALG KILS KFEM KTDM KESS KNUC KPA KOMCCO KCEM KRCS KWBGSY KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KWN KERG KLTN KALM KCCP KSUMPHUM KREL KGH KLIP KTLA KAWK KWMM KVRP KVRC KAID KSLG KDEMK KX KIF KNPR KCFC KFTFN KTFM KPDD KCERS KMOC KDEMAF KMEPI KEMS KDRM KEPREL KBTR KEDU KNP KIRL KNNR KMPT KISLPINR KTPN KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KTDD KAKA KFRP KWNM KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KWWMN KECF KWBC KPRO KVBL KOM KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KEDM KFLD KLPM KRGY KNNF KICR KIFR KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KDDG KCGC KID KNSD KMPF KPFO KDP KCMR KRMS KNPT KNNNP KTIAPARM KDTB KNUP KPGOV KNAP KNNC KUK KSRE KREISLER KIVP KQ KTIAEUN KPALAOIS KRM KISLAO KWM KFLOA
PHUM PINR PTER PGOV PREL PREF PL PM PHSA PE PARM PINS PK PUNE PO PALESTINIAN PU PBTS PROP PTBS POL POLI PA PGOVZI POLMIL POLITICAL PARTIES POLM PD POLITICS POLICY PAS PMIL PINT PNAT PV PKO PPOL PERSONS PING PBIO PH PETR PARMS PRES PCON PETERS PRELBR PT PLAB PP PAK PDEM PKPA PSOCI PF PLO PTERM PJUS PSOE PELOSI PROPERTY PGOVPREL PARP PRL PNIR PHUMKPAL PG PREZ PGIC PBOV PAO PKK PROV PHSAK PHUMPREL PROTECTION PGOVBL PSI PRELPK PGOVENRG PUM PRELKPKO PATTY PSOC PRIVATIZATION PRELSP PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PMIG PREC PAIGH PROG PSHA PARK PETER POG PHUS PPREL PS PTERPREL PRELPGOV POV PKPO PGOVECON POUS PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PWBG PMAR PREM PAR PNR PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PARMIR PGOVGM PHUH PARTM PN PRE PTE PY POLUN PPEL PDOV PGOVSOCI PIRF PGOVPM PBST PRELEVU PGOR PBTSRU PRM PRELKPAOIZ PGVO PERL PGOC PAGR PMIN PHUMR PVIP PPD PGV PRAM PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOF PINO PHAS PODC PRHUM PHUMA PREO PPA PEPFAR PGO PRGOV PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PREFA PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PINOCHET PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA PRELC PREK PHUME PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PGOVE PHALANAGE PARTY PECON PEACE PROCESS PLN PRELSW PAHO PEDRO PRELA PASS PPAO PGPV PNUM PCUL PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PEL PBT PAMQ PINF PSEPC POSTS PHUMPGOV PVOV PHSAPREL PROLIFERATION PENA PRELTBIOBA PIN PRELL PGOVPTER PHAM PHYTRP PTEL PTERPGOV PHARM PROTESTS PRELAF PKBL PRELKPAO PKNP PARMP PHUML PFOV PERM PUOS PRELGOV PHUMPTER PARAGRAPH PERURENA PBTSEWWT PCI PETROL PINSO PINSCE PQL PEREZ PBS

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 02RANGOON1547, OPIUM ERADICATION AND THE DECIMATION OF VILLAGES

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #02RANGOON1547.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
02RANGOON1547 2002-12-05 01:57 2011-08-25 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Rangoon
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 RANGOON 001547 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR INL, EAP AND EB/ODF 
TREASURY FOR OASIA AND FINCEN 
NSC FOR BEERS 
DEA FOR OF, OFF 
MANILA ALSO FOR USED/ADB 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: SNAR EAID BM
SUBJECT: OPIUM ERADICATION AND THE DECIMATION OF VILLAGES 
IN THE WA TERRITORIES 
 
1.  Summary: The fate of Song Keh, a village that was 
forcibly relocated in 1999 as part of the Wa opium 
eradication program, illustrates what may happen more broadly 
in the Wa territories as the Wa push forward with their 
program.  Left to fend for itself with only minimal supplies, 
almost one-quarter of the village's population died within a 
period of less than 3 years.  Picked up by UNDCP as emergency 
case when it was on the verge of returning to opium farming, 
Song Keh is now slowly recovering from the trauma of the 
experience.  However, UNDCP does not have the resources or 
the mandate to deal with the thousands of villages and 
hundreds of thousands of villagers who will be affected by Wa 
efforts to fulfill their pledge to make their territories 
opium-free by 2005.  As matters stand now, many villagers 
will pay for that program with their lives -- a fact that has 
caught the attention of Aung San Suu Kyi, among others in 
Burma. End Summary. 
 
2.  Nothing illustrates the human cost of the Wa opium 
eradication programs so well as the fate of Song Keh, a Wa 
village that was forcibly relocated to the Nam Lwe valley (in 
northern Shan State, near the border with China) in 1999.  A 
village of about 480 mostly Christian Wa, Song Keh was 
originally located north of Pang Sang near Mong Maw in one of 
the thickest opium growing regions of the Wa territories. 
Relocated to Nam Lwe, the villagers were given essentially 
the same support given all resettled villagers by the United 
Wa State Party -- a stretch of wooded bottom land, 6 months 
of food, building materials for their houses, some basic 
medicines, and, in the case of Song Keh, 10 buffalo to help 
with the initial plowing. 
 
3. However, in Song Keh's case, as in the case of many 
relocated villages, the supplies proved sadly inadequate, 
leaving the village at the close of 2001 on the verge of 
collapse.  By October 2001, when Poloff first visited the 
village, the population had dwindled to only 373 as death had 
claimed almost ten percent of villagers each year since the 
time they were relocated.  Forty-two died in 1999, 36 in 
2000, and 30 in 2001, with most deaths coming from 
malnutrition, complicated by severe anemia, chest infections, 
and intestinal diseases.  Village food production amounted to 
only about 10 percent of the village's annual needs and, even 
supported by income from other jobs, villagers faced a food 
deficit equivalent to four to six months of annual 
consumption.  In short, they were condemned to starve.  The 
original buffalo had all been slaughtered, there was no clean 
water source or sanitation facilities for the village and, 
out of desperation, most had moved back into opium 
cultivation.  Virtually all of the village's 67 acres had 
been seeded in opium for the 2001/02 crop year in an effort 
to generate cash for food. 
 
4.  That decision, in turn, nearly proved to be the death 
knell for the village.  As it turned out, Song Keh's fields 
lay exactly in the middle of an area that the Wa and UNDCP's 
Wa Alternative Development Project had designated as an opium 
free area.  Consequently, when the village's crop blossomed, 
it was quickly felled by a joint Wa/UNDCP eradication program 
in February and March 2002. 
 
5.  Fortunately, UNDCP did not leave the matter there, but 
put together a program for the critically stricken village. 
This included deployment of a mobile health team, child 
immunization, the distribution of mosquito nets, and the 
construction of new water points and toilet and sanitation 
facilities.  Clothes and rice (about 19 tons) were handed out 
on an emergency basis.  Seeds for summer and winter crops 
were also distributed.  A school was built, classes started, 
and plans laid for the installation of three low-lift pumps 
for irrigation, as well as a new rice storage facility. 
 
6.  The entire program cost less than $20,000, but the 
effects were immediate.  By November 2002, when Poloff 
visited again, village deaths had dropped by two-thirds to 
only 11 in the year to date; 42 children are in school; all 
the village children have been vaccinated; and there is no 
opium.  All of the villages 67 acres have been seeded in food 
crops for the 2002/03 winter season. 
 
7. Song Keh is, of course, an extreme case.  It was only one 
of 13 villages that were relocated from areas north of Pang 
Sang to areas around Mong Hpen in 1999 and 2000 and, while 
there was suffering in all, none of the others ended up in 
the desperate straits that developed in Song Keh.  That said, 
Song Keh is as vivid example as one will ever find of what 
can happen when villages are forced out of opium production 
without sufficient economic support. 
 
8.  For the Wa territories, of course, this is critical. 
Over the next three years, the territories as a whole are to 
complete a transition to opium-free status, essentially as a 
result of Burmese and Chinese political pressure.  Several 
thousand villages with a population of between 300,000 and 
400,000 people will be affected.  As of now, however, only 
those resident in the Wa Alternative Development Project area 
(about 40,000 people) will receive any support at all (and 
that only to the end of 2003).   The rest will essentially be 
left to fend for themselves or to the mercies of the Wa's 
relocation program.  In either case, many will die. 
 
Comment 
 
9. Two points are worth stressing about this situation, 
First, the risks that the Wa are taking with their own 
population gives some sense of the pressure they are under 
from both the Burmese and the Chinese to get out of opium. 
While the Wa have never been cautious about spending lives 
for the sake of real strategic objective, the fact that they 
are willing to spend lives in this cause gives a sense of its 
importance to them. 
 
10.  Secondly, someone will pay for the elimination of opium 
in the Wa territories and Burma more generally.  It is not a 
cost-free exercise. As matters stand now, most of those costs 
will be borne by upland villagers who have few options other 
than opium production. (Aung San Suu Kyi made this exact 
point to the Chief of Mission and Poloff on December 2.)  The 
Wa authorities and the Government of Burma may kick in some 
support, but, as Song Keh's experience demonstrates, it is 
hardly likely to be enough.  The international community, 
which will benefit most from the elimination of opium here, 
could also help. However, as yet, there is no sign that the 
international community will act on a scale sufficient to 
prevent a tragedy, essentially because of sensitivities about 
work with the Wa in Burma. 
Martinez