The Official Website of Representative David
Duke, PhD

4/2/2006

Is Discussing Jewish Dual
Loyalty Anti-Semitic?

Posted under:

General

—
@ 6:33 am

Left
– Steven Steinlight, former head of national affairs for the AJC, the
most powerful Jewish organization in America, writes of Jewish extremist loyalty
to Israel as the “true homeland” and Jews as superior to the inferior and
dangerous Gentiles. Is Steinlight anti-Semitic for saying this? Is David Duke
anti-Semitic for quoting him or believing him?

David Duke: My Response to the Boston Globe
Article
Is Discussing Jewish Dual
Loyalty Anti-Semitic?

Boston Globe
Opinion Piece Calls Me Anti-Semitic

By David Duke

On April 2, 2006 the Boston Globe ran an article by Geoffrey Wheatcroft
called “Most Favored Nation.” Wheatcroft is a “shabbez goy” Gentile who has
paved his way to fame and fortune in the heavily Jewish-influenced media by
offering the always sought-after Gentile voice for pro-Zionism. His utterly
Israeli-biased book called Controversy of Zion won the National Jewish
Book Award.

Now, the Boston Globe has given us Wheatcroft to lecture the good people of
Boston on the “controversy of Harvard,” a controversy because Jewish power
brokers do not like what they themselves boast about privately, their
overweening influence, to be bantered about in public, especially not by a dean
in the most prestigious University in the Land. Davidduke.com writing about it
makes them nervous, Harvard publishing it, makes them livid!

The interesting thing is that the overwhelming obviousness of the power of
the “Jewish Lobby” (politely called the Israeli lobby even though this lobby is
the handiwork of the largest Jewish organizations in the United States) can’t be
hidden even when somebody condemns the very notion of it. Those unaware of the
lobby and its power can’t help but be somewhat enlightened even by Wheatcroft’s
opinion piece in the Globe.

Wheatcroft disparages me along the way to telling the reader that the Israeli
Lobby is really nothing to be concerned about and that even if it was the
driving force behind the Iraq War, (a catastrophic war for America) Israelis
don’t see it as a war that will be good for Israel anyway.

Still, a few quotes from the article actually reveal the underlying truth of
the Harvard paper, “The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy.” Wheatcroft
writes:

One of Mearsheimer and Walt’s claims is that a pro-Israel lobby-with the
formidable AIPAC (America Israel Public Affairs Committee) to the
forefront-has powerfully influenced American policy in the Mideast. But that
in itself is not really controversial: After all, AIPAC likes to boast of its
own influence…

If Mearsheimer and Walt had wanted to show that they were saying the
unsayable, then they appear to have made their point-the ferocious response
suggests a taboo being broken.

Wheatcroft talks about the Atlantic divide:

And yet the American reaction is puzzling to Europeans: This question is
yet another illustration of the great transatlantic rift. On the eastern side
of the Atlantic, it has long been recognized that there is an intimate
connection between the United States and Israel, in which AIPAC clearly plays
a major role. The degree to which this has affected American policy, up to and
including the war in Iraq, has been discussed calmly by sane British
commentators-though also, to be sure, played up maliciously by
bigots.

Of course, there is one overriding reason why Europe and the rest of the
world know about the power of Jewish lobby over American politics, although
Europe has disproportionate Jewish media influence much like America, the
American media is more pro-Jewish extremist than much of even Israel’s media. I
learn more truth about Jewish extremism and Israeli crimes from the Israeli
Daily Haaretz than I do from the NY Times or Washington Post. Wheatcroft goes
on:

In America, by contrast, there has been an unmistakable tendency to shy
away from this subject. As Michael Kinsley wrote in Slate in the autumn of
2002, both supporters and opponents of the coming war did not want to invoke
classic anti-Semitic images of cabals, arcane conspiracies, and malign
courtiers whispering into the prince’s ear. Such motives are honorable, and
yet there is always a danger when something is willfully ignored. As Kinsley
said, the connection between the invasion of Iraq and Israeli interests had
become ‘’the proverbial elephant in the room. Everybody sees it, no one
mentions it.” Until now, at any rate.

He quotes the unabashed Israeli-firster and pro-Iraq War advocate, the
exceedingly Jewish, Thomas L. Freedman:

…there are doubtless a good many Jewish Americans who (even if they resent
the charges made by Mearsheimer and Walt) are at the least uneasy about the
work of AIPAC and its associates. Thomas L. Friedman of The New York Times is
understandably dismayed when an apparently civilized and educated Arab tells
him ‘’that the Jews control the US government.” But then elsewhere, Friedman
admits that only the White House could ever have restrained Israel from what
he calls its ‘’insane” settlement policies, but that President Bush will never
do so since that ‘’would inevitably force a clash with US Jews, whose votes
and donations he needs to protect his GOP majority in the House.” When is a
distinction a difference?

For that matter, the respected foreign policy analyst Anatol Lieven of the
New America Foundation in Washington has been writing about this for some time
(and without igniting a media firestorm). In his view, the alliance with
Israel, so far from being a source of strength, is a grave source of weakness
for the United States, in dealing with the Muslim world and in combating
terrorism.

One of the forbidden issues in the Jewish-influenced American media is the
question of whether or not many powerful Jews in media and government put the
interests of Israel over that of the United States of America. Wheatcroft
dismisses the dual loyalty issue in part by attacking me.

One reason Mearsheimer and Walt have caused such anger is surely because to
discuss the ‘’Israel lobby” is to raise the age-old question of ‘’dual
loyalty”: Does an intense attachment to the cause of Israel compromise an
American citizen’s first national allegiance? And although Mearsheimer and
Walt do not claim that many American Jews have a higher loyalty to Israel,
undisguised anti-Semites like David Duke-who has praised the paper-do just
that.

First off, to Mr. Wheatcroft and anyone else who cares to know, I am not
anti-Semitic, disguised or otherwise, simply because I expose elements of Jewish
extremism and supremacism. Am I supposed to be anti-Semitic because I dare to
raise the question of the loyalty of many of the major Jewish organizations,
lobbies, media bosses and Zionist government bureaucrats?

I will quote once more from one of the leading Jews of the United States,
former head of National Affairs (domestic policy) for the American Jewish
Committee (AJC), the most powerful Jewish organization in the United States:

“I’ll confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jewish
kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a
quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months for 10 formative years during my
childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning,
I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a
foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk
songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland. Emigration
to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many other Jewish teens
of my generation, I spent two summers working in Israel on a collective farm
while I contemplated that possibility. More tacitly and subconsciously, I was
taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We
were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom
sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive,
intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of
our dark history is that we could rely on no one.”

This is not an off hand comment but Steinlight’s own carefully chosen words
used in an article for a Jewish magazine. (Backgounder, October 2001) Steinlight
clearly tells us that indeed it is true that many Jews are not merely dual
loyalists, but single loyalists: whose loyalty is exclusively toward Israel
combined with an open belief in Jewish superiority over and hostility toward
Gentiles who comprise 97 percent of the American people! To Steinlight, Gentiles
are inferior in intelligence, sensitivity and morals. He goes on to say that he
and his fellow Jews have been taught that Gentiles are untrustworthy and
dangerous to Jews. Steinlight says that these values were instilled into
“typical Jewish kids of my generation.”

Either the Steinlight quote is bogus, or it is de facto evidence that Jewish,
anti-American, anti-Gentile supremacism and disloyalty exist in the United
States

The Steinlight quote is quite amazing because it comes from such a prominent
Jew in the most prominent Jewish organization in America, but with a little
research one can find thousands of similar quotes in Jewish literature in
everything from Stephen Roth to Daniel Goldhagen.

Does this make all these prominent Jews “undisguised anti-Semites,” or is it
just anti-Semitic for a Gentile to quote these supremacist Jews? Or does it
become anti-Semitic simply for airing this to an audience comprised of
significant numbers of people other than Jews? But it is not anti-Semitic when
Jews say these same things only among fellow Jews?

For the record, I am not anti-Semitic.

I simply don’t want people who have loyalty to a foreign nation to have
powerful influence over the foreign policy of the United States.

I don’t want 20,000 Americans to be maimed or killed for Israeli
strategic objectives.

I don’t want the economy-crushing trillion dollar eventual costs of
this war for Israel.

I don’t want America to engage in immoral wars at a huge cost of
American and foreign innocent human life.

I don’t want Americans to be lied to by a press dominated by Jewish
supremacists.

I don’t want Israeli control over American foreign policy to lead to
hatred and acts of terrorism against the United States.

The Harvard paper is a great step toward the truth. Yet, it goes not nearly
far enough in exposing the perfidy of Israel and Israeli crimes against the
United States. For instance the paper doesn’t even mention Israeli acts of
violent terrorism committed against America. These acts are confirmed in minor
articles in the major controlled media, but are essentially ignored by the
pundits who interpret the world for us. But that’s another article for another
time on Davidduke.com. For more information about this issue, just browse my
website.

Thanks to Mr. Wheatcroft for his attack upon me and the fact that many people
reading that attack have now found their way to davidduke.com and my
response!

0.124 || Powered by Duke
site

Search this Site:

Get the latest Duke email updates!

Articles by David Duke

CIA Official Confirms Duke Was
Right

Freedom of Speech

No War for Israel!

David Duke’s State of
the Union Address

Should Christians
Support Israel?

It’s not about the oil,
stupid!

The War against
America

Germs to Iraq

One Year Later:
911

The Lies of
Globalism

The Hypocrisy of
Jewish Supremacism

Israeli Terrorism and
Sept. 11

Will anyone dare ask
why?

The Big Lie

America on the
Brink

There is no
escape!

Is Russia the Key to
White survival?

Siler City and
Immigration

Kayla Rolland: One
More Victim

America is at the
crossroads

Black Population
Welfare Bomb Ticks

Fighting the Cultural
War in America

Duke Radio Archive

Main Radio Page

Links

Duke Radio Archive

The Council of Conservative Citizens

Stormfront
Forum

The Truth at Last - Dr. Ed
Fields\' website

American Free Press

E.U.R.O. - European American
Unity & Rights Organization

National Vanguard

American Renaissance

The Barnes Review

The Occidental
Quarterly

The Institute for Historical Review
(IHR)

Noontide Press

Race, Media and Society

Facts About Black
Crime in America

Jewish Supremacism
Preface

My Awakening --
chapt. 15 - The Jewish Question

Teaching Tolerance

The Costs of
Immigration

What is
Nationalism?

What Is Racism?

Whatever Happened to
Eugenics?

Who Runs the
Media?

Categories:

General

Innate Intellectual &
Psychological Differences

Intelligence: Heredity Vs.
Environment

Race and Crime

Race Information Library

Racial Differences

April 2006

M

T

W

T

F

S

S

« Mar

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

Syndication:

RSS 2.0

Atom 0.3

RSS 0.92

RDF

Archives:

Last 100 articles

All previous
articles

April
2006

March
2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August
2005

July
2005

June
2005

May
2005

April
2005

March
2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004

October 2004

August
2004

July
2004

June
2004

May
2004

March
2004

January 2004

December 2002

November 2002

December 2001

July
2001

May
2001

January 1900

Other:

login

register