Subject: Benjamin H. Freedman on the Role of the Jews in WWI and WWII
From: <Saved by Microsoft Internet Explorer 5>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 16:15:38 +0800

Benjamin H. Freedman, Germany and the Jews: The Role of the Jews in WWI and
WWII

Peter Myers, November 25, 2000; audio added May 7, 2006. Write to me at mailto:[email-masked].

You are at http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/freedman.html.

(1) Audio (2) Text

(1) Audio

An mp3 audio file of Freedman's speech is at
http://www.iamthewitness.com/index.html

40 minute excerpt:
<http://www.erichufschmid.net/BenjaminFreedmansSpeech16.mp3>,
5.5 mb

The complete 1 hour 27 minute speech:

Part 1, Freedman speech
<http://www.erichufschmid.net/BenjaminFreedmanSpeechPart_1.mp3>,
6.6 mb
Part 2, Freedman speech
<http://www.erichufschmid.net/BenjaminFreedmanSpeechPart_2.mp3>,
6.3 mb
Part 3, Freedman speech
<http://www.erichufschmid.net/BenjaminFreedmanSpeechPart_3.mp3>,
7.9 mb

If you have torrent software, the complete speech is one 36 mb mp3 file:

http://www.torrentreactor.to/torrents/download_78053.

(2) Text

Speech by Benjamin H. Freedman, given at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.
C. in 1961.

From Jackie Patru at http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

A Jewish Defector Warns America:

Benjamin Freedman Speaks on Zionism This should do it! For the second and
last time we are updating the transcript of Ben Freedman's 1961 speech at the
Willard Hotel. The piece has been posted for over a year now. A few months ago,
a person challenged the authenticity of the transcript, because his version
stated that Samuel Untermeyer had used the Columbia Broadcasting studios when he
declared a worldwide boycott against Germany -- in his words: 'A Holy War'. We
could not debate the issue, having never heard the actual recording of Mr.
Freedman's speech. Today, I discovered that we have a cassette tape of the
speech, so I listened to the entire tape while reading the posted
transcript. According to Mr. Freedman the radio station used by Untermeyer was,
in fact, ABC. There had also been some simple rearrangements of sentence
structure in that transcript, and a line or two omitted in places. For the sake
of authenticity, the corrections have been made. The transcript is now word
for word from Mr. Freedman's speech. The original transcriber had 'tidied
up' Mr. Freedman's responses during the Q&A period, omitting superfluous and
repetitious words. For the most part, we've left the tidied up version as it
was, since it didn't change the response, and actually helped to clarify Mr.
Freedman's answers. If the names were changed, he could have been making that
speech yesterday. -- Jackie -- April 8, 2003 Here is our first update notice,
about a year ago: The original posting of this speech was taken from an existing
web site. In going through our files we recently discovered a full transcript of
the speech and realized the original posting was not complete. Here is the
transcript from our files, with additional text at the beginning - some within
the body of the speech - and a question and answer section at the end that had
not been included in the original posting. There will be further postings from
other writers and quotes that will confirm much of what Mr. Freedman said here.
Many of you will see the truth of it, as it stands. -- Jackie --

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Truth will stand on its own merit

A Jewish Defector Warns America:

Benjamin Freedman Speaks by Benjamin H. Freedman

Introductory Note -- Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and
amazing individuals of the 20th century.

Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York
City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He
broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-

ist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great
preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars,
exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.

Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at
the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power
over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch,
Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and
John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. This speech was
given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington,
D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common
Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has
become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his warning to the West
-- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S. ---

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A CHRISTIAN VIEW OF THE HOLOCAUST Ladies and gentlemen, you are about to hear
a very frightening speech. This speech is an explanation of the plans now being
laid to throw the United States into a third world war. It was made a short time
ago before a large group in the Congressional `Room of the Willard Hotel in
Washington, D.C. Both the speech and the question and answer period later so
electrified the audience that a group of patriots has transferred it to two
long-playing records which you may buy to play for friends, clubs, and your
church group in your community. The speaker is Mr. Benjamin Freedman, noted
authority on Zionism and all of its schemes. Mr. Freedman is a former Jew, and I
mean a FORMER Jew. He has fought the Communist world conspiracy tooth and nail,
and stands today as a leading American patriot. We now take you to the speaker's
platform to present Benjamin Freedman. (applause) [Freedman's speech]

What I intend to tell you tonight is something that you have never been able
to learn from any other source, and what I tell you now concerns not only you,
but your children and the survival of this country and Christianity. I'm not
here just to dish up a few facts to send up your blood pressure, but I'm here to
tell you things that will help you preserve what you consider the most sacred
things in the world: the liberty, and the freedom, and the right to live as
Christians, where you have a little dignity, and a little right to pursue the
things that your conscience tells you are the right things, as Christians. Now,
first of all, I'd like to tell you that on August 25th 1960 -- that was shortly
before elections -- Senator Kennedy, who is now the President of the United
States, went to New York, and delivered an address to the Zionist Organization
of America. In that address, to reduce it to its briefest form, he stated that
he would use the armed forces of the United States to preserve the existence of
the regime set up in Palestine by the Zionists who are now in occupation of that
area. In other words, Christian boys are going to be yanked out of their homes,
away from their families, and sent abroad to fight in Palestine against the
Christian and Moslem Arabs who merely want to return to their homes. And these
Christian boys are going to be asked to shoot to kill these innocent [Arab
Palestinians] people who only want to follow out fifteen resolutions passed by
the United Nations in the last twelve years calling upon the Zionists to allow
these people to return to their homes.

Now, when United States troops appear in the Middle East to fight with the
Zionists as their allies to prevent the return of these people who were
evicted from their homes in the 1948 armed insurrection by the Zionists who were
transplanted there from Eastern Europe... when that happens, the United
States will trigger World War III.

You say, when will that take place? The answer is, as soon as the difficulty
between France and Algeria has been settled, that will take place. As soon as
France and Algeria have been settled, that will take place. As soon as France
and Algeria have settled their difficulty, and the Arab world, or the Moslem
world, has no more war on their hands with France, they are going to move these
people back into their homes, and when they do that and President kennedy sends
your sons to fight over there to help the crooks hold on to what they stole from
innocent men, women and children, we will trigger World War III; and when that
starts you can be sure we cannot emerge from that war a victor. We are going to
lose that war because there is not one nation in the world that will let one of
their sons fight with us for such a cause.

I know and speak to these ambassadors in Washington and the United Nations --
and of the ninety-nine nations there, I've consulted with maybe seventy of them
-- and when we go to war in Palestine to help the thieves retain possession of
what they have stolen from these innocent people we're not going to have a man
there to fight with us as our ally. And who will these people have supporting
them, you ask. Well, four days after President Kennedy -- or he was then Senator
Kennedy -- made that statement on August 28, 1960, the Arab nations called a
meeting in Lebanon and there they decided to resurrect, or reactivate, the
government of Palestine, which has been dormant more or less, since the 1948
armed insurrection by the Zionists.

Not only that... they ordered the creation of the Palestine Army, and they
are now drilling maybe a half a million soldiers in that area of the world to
lead these people back to their homeland. With them, they have as their allies
all the nations of what is termed the Bandung Conference Group. That includes
the Soviet Union and every Soviet Union satellite. It includes Red China; it
includes every independent country in Asia and Africa; or eighty percent of the
world's total population. Eighty percent of the world's population. Four out of
five human beings on the face of the earth will be our enemies at war with us.
And not alone are they four out of five human beings now on the face of this
earth, but they are the non-Christian population of the world and they are the
non-Caucasians... the non-white nations of the world, and that's what we face.
And what is the reason? The reason is that here in the United States, the
Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. For
many reasons too many and too complex to go into here at this -- time I'll be
glad to answer questions, however, to support that statement -- the Zionists and
their co-religionists rule this United States as though they were the absolute
monarchs of this country.

Now, you say, 'well, that's a very broad statement to make', but let me show
what happened while you were -- I don't want to wear that out --- let me show
what happened while WE were all asleep. I'm including myself with you. We were
all asleep. What happened?

World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. Nineteen-hundred and
fourteen was the year in which World War One broke out. There are few people
here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great
Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary,
and Turkey. What happened?

Within two years Germany had won that war: not alone won it nominally,
but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world,
had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there
without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week's food supply
facing her -- and after that, starvation.

At that time, the French army had mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the flower
of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was
defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to
play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Now Germany -- not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an
enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was Germany
offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on
what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war
off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." Well, England, in
the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously! They had no choice. It was
either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering
them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated. While that was going
on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe,
went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because this is a
long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make if
anyone here is curious, or doesn't believe what I'm saying is at all possible
-- the Zionists in London went to the British war cabinet and they said:
"Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't
have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win
this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was
not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were
powerful. They [Zionists] told England: "We will guarantee to bring the
United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side,
if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war."

In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this
war as your ally. The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won the
war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey."

Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United
States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's
absolutely absurd that Great Britain -- that never had any connection or any
interest or any right in what is known as Palestine -- should offer it as coin
of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war.

However, they made that promise, in October of 1916. October, nineteen
hundred and sixteen. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here
remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally
pro-German -- totally pro-German -- because the newspapers here were
controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass
communications in this country were controlled by Jews, and they were pro-German
because their people, in the majority of cases came from Germany, and they
wanted to see Germany lick the Czar.

The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this
war. So the German bankers -- the German-Jews -- Kuhn Loeb and the other big
banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to
the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and
England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into
Germany, they fought with Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist
regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine,
they went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything
changed, like the traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the
newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of
the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and
in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were
villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting
off babies' hands. And they were no good.

Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany. The
Zionists in London sent these cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis:
"Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now
you go to work, and you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States
into the war." And that did happen. That's how the United States got into the
war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we
have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room.

Now the war -- World War One -- in which the United States participated had
absolutely no reason to be our war. We went in there -- we were railroaded into
it -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the
Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now, that is something that the
people in the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went
into World War One. Now, what happened? After we got into the war, the Zionists
went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the
agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep
your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." Because they didn't
know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they
started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, and it was
worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it
was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration. The Balfour
Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had
agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So
this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as
a three dollar bill. And I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.

Now, that is where all the trouble started. The United States went in the
war. The United States crushed Germany. We went in there, and it's history. You
know what happened. Now, when the war was ended, and the Germans went to
Paris, to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, there were 117 Jews there, as a
delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I
ought to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they
were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations that
claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, the Jews said, "How
about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the
knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for
the first time realized, "Oh, that was the game! That's why the United States
came into the war." And the Germans for the first time realized that they
were defeated, they suffered this terrific reparation that was slapped onto
them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and they were determined to get it
at any cost.

Now, that brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans
realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had
never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in
Germany.

You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in
industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr.
Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the
Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the
Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant
bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany.
No question about that. Now, the Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout."
It was a sellout that I can best compare -- suppose the United States was at war
today with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union:
"Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And
all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And
throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with
reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass.

Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in
this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we thought they were loyal
citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it
was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would
we feel, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them
would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be lampposts enough,
convenient, to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. "We've been so nice to
them"; and from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed,
and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And
Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they
sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than they wanted
Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth." Now, Nahum Sokolow -- all
the great leaders, the big names that you read about in connection with Zionism
today -- they, in 1919, 1920, '21, '22, and '23, they wrote in all their
papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that "the feeling
against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this
great defeat was brought about by our intercession and bringing the United
States into the war against them." The Jews themselves admitted that. It
wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted
better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There
was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious
belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious.

Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades
and said "Shema' Yisrael" or "Our Father." No one cared in Germany any more than
they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany
was due to one thing: that the Germans held the Jews responsible for their
crushing defeat, for no reason at all, because World War One was started against
Germany for no reason for which they [Germans] were responsible. They were
guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They
built up world trade. You must remember, Germany, at the time of Napoleon, at
the time of the French Revolution, what was the German Reich consisted of 300 --
three hundred! -- small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth.
Three hundred little separate political entities. And between that time, between
the period of ... between Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one
state. And within 50 years after that time they became one of the world's great
powers. Their navy was rivalling Great Britain's, they were doing business all
over the world, they could undersell anybody and make better products. And what
happened? What happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia that: "We must
slap down Germany", because there isn't one historian in the world that can find
a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map
politically. Now, what happened after that?

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat,
they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was
harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who
had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book,
and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew
who Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of
political prisoners. And he wrote back that he found them in very fine
condition. They were in excellent shape; everybody treated well. And they were
filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews
happened to be maybe 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time.
And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, Masons, and
others who had international affiliations.

Now, the Jews sort of tried to keep the lid on this fact. They didn't want
the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the
Germans resented that.

So they did take appropriate action against them [against the Jews]. They ...
shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could? They shunned them.
The same as we would the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in
this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.

Now, after a while, the Jews of the world didn't know what to do, so they
called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended
in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler! And you put every
Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist, no matter what he
was. You can't treat us that way! And we, the Jews of the world, are calling
upon you, and serving this ultimatum upon you." Well, the Germans told them ...
you can imagine. So what did they [the Jews] do?

They broke up, and Samuel Untermyer, if the name means anything to people
here ... (You want to ask a question? --- Uh, there were no Communists in
Germany at that time. they were called 'Social Democrats.)

Well, I don't want to go by what they were called. We're now using English
words, and what they were called in Germany is not very material ... but they
were Communists, because in 1917, the Communists took over Germany for a few
days. Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht, and a group of Jews in Germany took
over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war,
he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over
Germany as they did Russia, and that he was going to meet the same fate that the
Czar did in Russia. So he left and went to Holland for safety and for security.

Now, at that time, when the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, it was
quiet, the Jews were working, still trying to get back into their former --
their status -- and the Germans fought them in every way they could, without
hurting a hair on anyone's head. The same as one group, the Prohibitionists,
fought the people who were interested in liquor, and they didn't fight one
another with pistols, they did it every way they could.

Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And, at that
time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans and there were only 460,000
Jews ... less than one half of one percent of Germany were Jews. And yet,
they controlled all of the press, they controlled most of the economy,
because they had come in and with cheap money -- you know the way the Mark was
devalued -- they bought up practically everything.

Well, in 1933 when Germany refused to surrender, mind you, to the World
Conference of Jews in Amsterdam, they broke up and Mr. Untermeyer came
back to the United States -- who was the head of the American delegation and the
president of the whole conference -- and he went from the steamer to ABC and
made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he said:

"The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are
now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve
them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them, that
will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business."

And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported,
and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. Their
labor. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would
have to starve. There just was not enough food for more than one third of the
population.

Now in this declaration, which I have here, it was printed on page -- a whole
page -- in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer
boldly stated that: "this economic boycott is our means of self-defense.
President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the NRA" . [National Recovery
Administration] -- which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be
boycotted unless they followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, which of
course was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court at that time.

Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and
it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in
the world with the words "made in Germany" on it.

In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump
millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their
stores were boycotted. If anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in
Germany," they were picketed with signs: "Hitler", "murderer", and so forth, and
like -- something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.

R. H. Macy, which is controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to
be Jews ... a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made
in Germany". Well, they were cotton stockings. They may have been there 20
years, because since I've been observing women's legs in the last twenty years,
I haven't seen a pair with cotton stockings on them. So Macy! I saw Macy
boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "MURDERS"
and "HITLERITES", and so forth.

Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in
Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder,
there was nothing.

Now, that ... naturally, the Germans said, "Why, who are these people to
declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and our
industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally
resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews.

Why should a German go in and give their money to a storekeeper who was part
of a boycott who was going to starve Germany into surrender into the Jews of the
world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be?
Well, it was ridiculous.

That continued for some time, and it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from
Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot one of the officials [a
German official] that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in
Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and
so forth.

Now, for anyone to say that -- I don't like to use the word 'anti-Semitism'
because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to
use it -- the only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was
that they were responsible: number one, for World War One; number two, for this
world-wide boycott, and number three -- did I say for World War One, they were
responsible? For the boycott -- and also for World War II, because after this
thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to
lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive.

In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had
decided [that] Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in
between. It's going to be Christian or it's going to be Communist. And the
Germans decided: "We're going to keep it Christian if possible". And they
started to re-arm.

And there intention was -- by that time the United States had recognized the
Soviet Union, which they did in November, 1933 -- the Soviet Union was becoming
very powerful, and Germany realized: "Well, our turn is going to come soon,
unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our
turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong."

And our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars of your money for
defense, they say. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in
Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control
of many other governments of the world.

Now, for this country to now be on the verge of a Third World War, from which
we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know
that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used
to describe one million tons of TNT. One million tons of TNT is a megaton. Now,
our nuclear bombs have a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT.
That was when they were first developed five or six years ago. Now, the nuclear
bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows
how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

So, what do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a
nuclear war, humanity is finished. And why will it take place? It will take
place because Act III ... the curtain goes up on Act III. Act I was World War I.
Act II was World War II. Act III is going to be World War III.

The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are
determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them
permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. Now,
that is just as true as I am standing here, because not alone have I read it,
but many here have read it, and it's known all over the world.

Now, what are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys
may be on their way to that war tonight; and you you don't know it any more than
you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War
Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a
person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it.

Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Others knew it.
Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison
to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was
elected, and there was talk around the office there.

I was 'confidential man' to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the
Finance Committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer.
So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the
table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's
brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal
Reserve, and also indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement.

Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers
on this hand, and President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came
to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. And that's how they got us
into World War I, while we all slept.

Now, at this moment... at this moment they may be planning this World War
III, in which we don't stand a chance even if they don't use nuclear bombs. How
can the United States -- about five percent of the world -- go out and fight
eighty to ninety percent of the world on their home ground? How can we do it...
send our boys over there to be slaughtered? For what? So the Jews can have
Palestine as their 'commonwealth'? They've fooled you so much that you don't
know whether you're coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness that you
find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." That is
correct. I don't know from what state you come, but in New York state that is
the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness said one lie, disregard his
testimony.

Now, what are the facts about the Jews?

The Jews -- I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I
don't call them Jews. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what
they are. If Jesus was a Jew, there isn't a Jew in the world today, and if those
people are Jews, certainly our Lord and Savior was not one of them, and I can
prove that.

Now what happened? The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per
cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews,
were originally Khazars.

They were a warlike tribe that lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were
so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe --
and to reduce this so you don't get too confused about the history of Eastern
Europe -- they set up this big Khazar kingdom: 800,000 square miles. Only, there
was no Russia, there were no other countries, and the Khazar kingdom was the
biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other
monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers.
That's how big and powerful they were.

Now, they were phallic worshippers, which is filthy. I don't want to go into
the details of that now. It was their religion the way it was the religion of
many other Pagans or Barbarians elsewhere in the world.

Now, the [Khazar] king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom
that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either Christianity,
Islam -- the Moslem faith -- or what is known today as Judaism -- really
Talmudism. So, like spinning a top and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he
picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion.

He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up
thousands of these rabbis with their teachings, and opened up synagogues and
schools in his kingdom of 800,000 people -- 800,000 thousand square miles -- and
maybe ten to twenty million people; and they became what we call Jews. There
wasn't one of them that had an ancestor that ever put a toe in the Holy Land,
not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of
them! And yet they come to the Christians and they ask us to support their armed
insurrection in Palestine by saying:

"Well, you want to certainly help repatriate God's chosen people to their
Promised Land, their ancestral homeland, It's your Christian duty. We gave you
one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and
kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews."

Well, they were pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish
[were converted]. And it's just as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy
Land," as it would be ... there are 54 million Chinese Moslems. Fifty four
million! And, Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., so in that time, 54 million
Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief.

Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, where the city of Mecca
is located, where Mohammed was born ... imagine if the 54 million Chinese called
themselves 'Arabs'. Imagine! Why, you'd say they're lunatics. Anyone who
believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was
adopt as a religious faith; a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia.

The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them
in the ocean and imported from the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants that were
Christians. They weren't different people. They were the same people, but they
had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.

Now, these Pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns ... they were a
Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. They likewise,
because their king took the faith -- Talmudic faith -- they had no choice. Just
the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic.
If not, you had to get out of Spain. So everybody -- they lived on the land just
like the trees and the bushes; a human being belonged to the land under their
feudal system -- so they [Khazars] all became what we call today, Jews!

Now imagine how silly it was for the Christians ... for the great Christian
countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power, our prestige to
repatriate God's chosen people to their ancestral homeland, their Promised
Land."

Now, could there be a bigger lie than that? Could there be a bigger lie than
that?

And because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the
television, the book publishing business, they have the ministers in the
pulpit, they have the politicians on the soap boxes talking the same
language ... so naturally you'd believe black is white if you heard it often
enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start to call black
white. And nobody could blame you.

Now, that is one of the great lies ... that is the foundation of all the
misery that has befallen the world. Because after two wars fought in Europe --
World War I and World War II -- if it wasn't possible for them to live in peace
and harmony with the people in Europe, like their brethren are living in the
United States, what were the two wars fought for? Did they have to -- like you
flush the toilet -- because they couldn't get along, did they have to say,
"Well, we're going back to our homeland and you Christians can help us"?

I can't understand yet how the Christians in Europe could have been that dumb
because every theologian, every history teacher, knew the things that I'm
telling you. But, they naturally bribed them, shut them up with money, stuffed
their mouths with money, and now ... I don't care whether you know all this or
not. It doesn't make any difference to me whether you know all these facts or
not, but it does make a difference to me. I've got, in my family, boys that will
have to be in the next war, and I don't want them to go and fight and die...
like they died in Korea. Like they died in Japan. Like they've died all over the
world. For what?

To help crooks hold on to what they stole from innocent people who had been
in peaceful possession of that land, those farms, those homes for hundreds and
maybe thousands of years? Is that why the United States must go to war? Because
the Democratic Party wants New York State -- the electoral vote? Illinois, the
electoral vote? And Pennsylvania, the electoral vote?... which are controlled by
the Zionists and their co-religionists? ... the balance of power?

In New York City there are 400,000 members of the liberal party, all Zionists
and their co-religionists. And New York State went for Kennedy by 400,000 votes.
Now, I don't blame Mr. Kennedy. I'm fond of Mr. Kennedy. I think he's a great
man. I think he can really pull us out of this trouble if we get the facts to
him. And I believe he knows a great deal more than his appointments indicate he
knows. He's playing with the enemy. Like when you go fishing, you've got to play
with the fish. Let 'em out and pull 'em in. Let 'em out and pull 'em in. But
knowing Mr. Kennedy's father, and how well informed he is on this whole subject,
and how close Kennedy is to his father, I don't think Mr. Kennedy is totally in
the dark.

But I do think that it is the duty of every mother, every loyal Christian ,
every person that regards the defense of this country as a sacred right, that
they communicate -- not with their congressman, not with their senator, but with
President Kennedy. And tell him, "I do not think you should send my boy, or our
boys, wearing the uniform of the United States of America, and under the flag
that you see here, our red, white and blue, to fight there to help keep in the
hands of these that which they have stolen". I think everyone should not alone
write once, but keep writing and get your friends to write.

Now, I could go on endlessly, and tell you these things to support what I
have just asked you to do. But I don't think it's necessary to do that. You're
above the average group in intelligence and I don't think it's necessary to
impress this any more.

But ... I want to tell you one more thing. You talk about... "Oh, the Jews.
Why the Jews? Christianity. Why, we got Christianity from the Jews and the Jews
gave us Jesus, and the Jews gave us our religion". But do you know that on the
day of atonement that you think is so sacred to them, that on that day... and I
was one of them! This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm
here to give you facts.

When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, the very first
prayer that you recite, you stand -- and it's the only prayer for which you
stand -- and you repeat three times a short prayer. The Kol Nidre. In
that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow,
or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months -- any oath,
vow or pledge that you may take during the next twelve months shall be null
and void.

The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall
not be a pledge. They shall have no force and effect, and so forth and so on.

And further than that, the Talmud teaches: "Don't forget -- whenever you take
an oath, vow, and pledge -- remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on
the Day of Atonement, and that exempts you from fulfilling that".

How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty
as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.

And we're going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for
the same reason. You can't depend upon something as insecure as the leadership
that is not obliged to respect an oath, vow or pledge. Now I could go on and
recite many other things to you, but I would have a little respect for your
time, and you want to really, uh, get through with all of this. Tomorrow's going
to be a long day.

Now I want to say one thing. You ask me ... well, you think to yourself:
"well how did this fellow get mixed up in this the way he got mixed up in it."
Well, I opened my mouth in 1945, and I took big pages in newspapers and tried to
tell the American people what I'm telling you. And one newspaper after another
refused the advertisement. And when I couldn't find a newspaper to take them --
I paid cash, not credit -- what happened? My lawyer told me, "There's an editor
over in Jersey with a paper who will take your announcement". So, I was brought
together with Mr. McGinley, and that's how I met him.

So somebody told me the lawyer who introduced me, who was the son of the Dean
of the Methodist Bishop, he said: "Well, I think he's a little anti-Semitic. I
don't know whether I can get him over here. So he brought him over to my
apartment and we hit it off wonderfully, and have since then.

Now, I say this, and I say it without any qualifications. I say it without
any reservations. And I say it without any hesitation ... if it wasn't for the
work that Mr. Conley McGinley did with "Common Sense" -- he's been sending out
from 1,800,000 to 2,000,000 every year -- if it wasn't for the work he's been
doing sending those out for fifteen years now, we would already be a communist
country. Nobody has done what he did to light fires. Many of the other active
persons in this fight learned all about if for the first time through "Common
Sense".

Now, I have been very active in helping him all I could. I'm not as flush as
I was. I cannot go on spending the money ... I'm not going to take up a
collection. Don't worry. I see five people getting up to leave. (laughter)

I haven't got the money that I used to spend. I used to print a quarter of a
million of them out of my own pocket and send them out. Mr. McGinley, when I
first met him, had maybe 5,000 printed and circulated them locally. So I said,
"With what you know and what I know, we can really do a good job". So I started
printing in outside shops of big newspaper companies, a quarter of a million,
and paid for them. Well, there's always a bottom to the barrel. I suppose we've
all reached that at times.

I'm not so poor that I can't live without working and that's what worries the
Anti-Defamation League. I can just get by without going and asking for a job or
getting on the bread line. But Mr. McGinley is working. He's sick and he's going
at this stronger than ever. And all I want to say is that they want to close up
"Common Sense" more than any other single thing in the whole world, as a
death-blow to the fight Christians are making to survive. So I just want to tell
you this. All they do is circulate rumors: "Mr. Benjamin H. Freedman is the
wealthy backer of 'Common Sense'." The reason they do that is to discourage the
people in the United States: don't send any money to Common Sense. They don't
need it. The've got the wealthy Mr. Freedman as a backer. That all has strategy.
They don't want to advertise me so that people that have real estate or
securities to sell will come and call on me. They just want people to lay off
"Common Sense". And all I'm telling you is, I do try to help him, but I haven't
been able to. And I will be very honest. One thing I won't do is lie. In the
last year I've had so much sickness in my family that I could not give him one
dollar.

How he's managed to survive, I don't know. God alone knows. And he must be in
God's care because how he's pulled through his sickness and with his financial
troubles, I don't know. But that press is working ... and every two weeks about
a hundred or a hundred-fifty-thousand of "Common Sense" go out with a new
message. And if that information could be multiplied ... if people that now get
it could buy ten or twenty five, or fifty, give them around. Plow that field.
Sow those seeds, you don't know which will take root, but for God's sake, this
is our last chance. [Freedman then discusses the importance of people forgoing
unnecessary purchases to 'buy more stuff', play golf, etc., and use the money to
keep "Common Sense" going. He explains that the paper is going in debt; could be
closed down and he (Freedman) no longer has the funds, having spent some
$2,400,000 in his attempt to bring the information to the American public and
elected officials. He then asks for questions from the audience.)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ {Question inaudible] Freedman: All
right, I'll comment on that. This is rather deep, but you all have a very high
degree of intelligence, so I'm going to make an attempt. In the time of Bible
history, there was a geographic area known as Judea. Judea was a province of the
Roman Empire. Now, a person who lived in Judea was known as a Judean, and in
Latin it was Judaeus; in Greek it was Judaius. Those are the two words, in Greek
and Latin, for a Judean.

Now, in Latin and Greek there is no such letter as 'j', and the first
syllable of Judaeus and Judaius starts 'ghu'. Now, when the Bible was written,
it was first written in Greek, Latin, Panantic, Syriac, Aramaic... all those
languages. Never Was the word Jew in any of them because the word didn't exist.
Judea was the country, and the people were Judeans, and Jesus was referred to
only as a Judean. I've seen those early... the earliest scripts available.

In 1345, a man by the name of Wycliffe in England thought that it was time to
translate the Bible into English. There was no English edition of the Bible
because who the Devil could read? It was only the educated church people who
could read Latin and Greek, Syriac, Aramaic and the other languages. Anyhow,
Wycliffe translated the Bible into English. But in it, he had to look around for
some words for Judaeas and Judaius.

There was no English word because Judea had passed out of existence. There
was no Judea. People had long ago forgotten that. So in the first translation he
used the word, in referring to Jesus, as 'gyu', "jew". At the time, there was no
printing press.

Then, between 1345 and the 17th century, when the press came into use, that
word passed through so many changes... I have them all here. If you want I can
read them to you. I will. That word 'gyu' which was in the Wycliffe Bible became
... first it was ' gyu ', then ' giu ', then ' iu ' (because the ' i ' in Latin
is pronounced like the ' j '. Julius Caesar is ' Iul ' because there is no 'j'
in Latin) then ' iuw ', then ' ieuu ', then ' ieuy ', then ' iwe ', then ' iow
', then ' iewe ', all in Bibles as time went on. Then ' ieue ', then ' iue ',
then ' ive ', and then ' ivw ', and finally in the 18th century... ' jew '. Jew.

All the corrupt and contracted forms for Judaius, and Judaeas in Latin. Now,
there was no such thing as 'Jew', and any theologian -- I've lectured in maybe
20 of the most prominent theological seminaries in this country, and two in
Europe -- there was no such word as Jew. There only was Judea, and Jesus was a
Judean and the first English use of a word in an English bible to describe him
was 'gyu' -- Jew. A contracted and shortened form of Judaeus, just the same as
we call a laboratory a 'lab', and gasoline 'gas'... a tendency to short up.

So, in England there were no public schools; people didn't know how to read;
it looked like a scrambled alphabet so they made a short word out of it. Now for
a theologian to say that you can't harm the Jews, is just ridiculous. I'd like
to know where in the scriptures it says that. I'd like to know the text. Look at
what happened to Germany for touching Jews. What would you, as a citizen of the
United States, do to people who did to you what the so-called Jews -- the
Pollacks and Litvaks and Litzianers -- they weren't Jews, as I just explained to
you. They were Eastern Europeans who'd been converted to Talmudism. There was no
such thing as Judaism. Judaism was a name given in recent years to this religion
known in Bible history as Torah [inaudible]. No Jew or no educated person ever
heard of Judaism. It didn't exist. They pulled it out of the air ... a
meaningless word.

Just like 'anti-Semitic'. The Arab is a Semite. And the Christians talk about
people who don't like Jews as anti-Semites, and they call all the Arabs
anti-Semites. The only Semites in the world are the Arabs. There isn't one Jew
who's a Semite. They're all Turkothean Mongoloids. The Eastern european Jews.
So, they brainwashed the public, and if you will invite me to meet this reverend
who told you these things, I'll convince him and it'll be one step in the right
direction. I'll go wherever I have to go to meet him.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yes, ma'am. Well... I can answer that. First of all, your
first premise is wrong. Your first premise that all the Jews are loyal to each
other is wrong. Because, the Eastern European Jews outnumber all the rest by so
many that they create the impression that they are the Jewish 'race'; that they
are the Jewish nation; that they are the Jewish people ... and the Christians
swallow it like a cream puff.

But in 1844 the German rabbis called a conference of rabbis from all over the
world for the purpose of abolishing the Kol Nidre from the Day of Atonement
religious ceremony. In Brunswick, Germany, where that conference was held in
1844, there was almost a terrific riot. A civil war.

The Eastern Europeans said, "What the hell. We should give up Kol Nidre? That
gives us our grip on our people. We give them a franchise so they can tell the
Christians, 'Go to hell. We'll make any deal you want', but they don't have to
carry it out. That gives us our grip on our people". So, they're not so united,
and if you knew the feeling that exists ... Now, I'll also show you from an
official document by the man responsible for ... uh, who baptized this race.
Here is a paper that we obtained from the archives of the Zionist organization
in New York City, and in it is the manuscript by Sir James A. Malcolm, who -- on
behalf of the British Cabinet -- negotiated the deal with these Zionists.

And in here he says that all the Jews in England were against it. The Jews
who had been there for years, the [inaudible - probably Sephardim], those who
had Portuguese and Spanish ad Dutch ancestry... who were monotheists and
believed in that religious belief. That was while the Eastern European Jews were
still running around in the heart of Asia and then came into Europe. But they
had no more to do with them than ... can we talk about a Christian 'race'? or a
Christian religion?... or are the Christians united?

So the same disunity is among the Jews. And I'll show you in this same
document that when they went to France to try and get the French government to
back that Zionist venture, there was only one Jew in France who was for it. That
was Rothschild, and they did it because they were interested in the oil and the
Suez Canal

------------------------------------------------ [Question inaudible]
Freedman: You know why? Because if they don't, they're decked up. They come
around and they tell you how much you must give, and if you don't ... oh, you're
anti-Semitic. Then none of their friends will have anything to do with them, and
they start a smear campaign ... and you have got to give.

In New York city, in the garment center, there are twelve manufacturers in
the building. And when the drive is on to sell Israel Bonds, the United Jewish
Drive, they put a big scoreboard with the names of the firms and opposite them,
as you make the amount they put you down for, they put a gold star after the
name. Then, the buyers are told, "When you come into that building to call on
someone and they haven't got a gold star, tell them that you won't buy from them
until they have the gold star". BLACKMAIL. I don't know what else you can call
it.

Then what do they do? They tell you it's for 'humanitarian purposes' and they
send maybe $8 billion dollars to Israel, tax exempt, tax deductible. So if they
hadn't sent that eight billion dollars to Israel, seven billion of it would have
gone into the U.S. Treasury as income tax. So what happens? That seven billion
dollars deficit -- that air pocket -- the gullible Christians have to make up.

They put a bigger tax on gas or bread or corporation tax. Somebody has to pay
the housekeeping expenses for the government. So why do you let these people
send their money over there to buy guns to drive people out of their ancient
homeland? And you say, "Oh, well. The poor Jews. They have no place to go and
they've been persecuted all their lives". They've never been persecuted for
their religion. And I wish I had two rows of Rabbis here to challenge me. Never
once, in all of history, have they been persecuted for their religion.

Do you know why the Jews were driven out of England? King Edward the First in
1285 drove them out, and they never came back until the Cromwell Revolution
which was financed by the Rothschilds. For four-hundred years there wasn't a
Jew. But do you know why they were driven out? Because in the Christian faith
and the Moslem faith it's a sin to charge 'rent' for the use of money. In other
words - what we call interest [usury] is a sin.

So the Jews had a monopoly in England and they charged so much interest, and
when the Lords and Dukes couldn't pay, they [Jews] foreclosed. And they were
creating so much trouble that the king of England finally made himself their
partner, because when they they came to foreclose, some of these dukes bumped
off the Jews ... the money-lenders. So the king finally said -- and this is all
in history, look up Tianson [Tennyson?] or Rourke, the History of the Jews in
England; two books you can find in your library. When the king found out what
the trouble was all about, and how much money they were making, he declared
himself a fifty-percent partner of the money lenders. Edward the First. And for
many years, one-third of the revenues of the British Treasury came from the
fifty-percent interest in money-lending by the Jews.

But it got worse and worse. So much worse that when the Lords and Dukes kept
killing the money-lenders, the King then said, "I declare myself the heir of all
the money-lenders. If they're killed you have to pay me, because I'm his sole
heir". That made so much trouble, because the King had to go out and collect the
money with an army, so he told the Jews to get out. There were 15,000 of them,
and they had to get out, and they went across to Ireland, and that's how Ireland
got to be part of the United Kingdom.

When King Edward found out what they were doing, he decided to take Ireland
for himself before someone else did. He sent Robert Southgard with a mercenary
army and conquered Ireland. So, show me one time where a Jew was persecuted in
any country because of his religion. It has never happened. It's always their
impact on the political, social, or economic customs and traditions of the
community in which they settle.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [Question inaudible] Freedman: Yes, sir. Well,
they say most of those things themselves. It was unnecessary for Benjamin
Franklin to say it. Most of those things they say themselves. But Benjamin
Franklin observed, and by hearsay understood, what was happening in Europe.

When Russia, in 920 was formed, and gradually surrounded the Khazar Kingdom,
and absorbed them, most of the well-to-do Khazars fled to Western Europe and
brought with them the very things to which you object and I object and a lot of
other people object. The customs, the habits, the instincts with which they were
endowed.

When Benjamin Franklin referred to them as Jews because that's the name that
they went by, and when the Christians first heard that these people who were
fleeing from Russia -- who they were -- that they had practiced this Talmudic
faith -- the Christians in Western Europe said, "They must be the remnants of
the lost ten tribes!"

And Mr. Grutz, the greatest historian amongst the Jews, said that -- and he's
probably as good an authority on that subject as there is. So when Ben Franklin
came to Europe in the 18th century, he already saw the results of what these
people had done after they left their homeland. And every word of it is true...
they say it themselves. I can give you half a dozen books they've written in
which they say the same thing: When they have money they become tyrants. And
when they become defeated, they become ruthless. They're only barbarians.
They're the descendants of Asiatic Mongols and they will do anything to
accomplish their purpose.

What right did they have to take over Russia the way they did? The Czar had
abdicated nine or ten months before that. There was no need for them ... they
were going to have a constitutional monarchy. But they didn't want that. When
the constitutional monarchy was to assemble in November, they mowed them all
down and established the Soviet Union.

There was no need for that. But they thought, "Now is the time", and if you
you will look in the Encyclopedia Britannica under the word 'Bolshevism', you'll
find the five laws there that Lenin put down for a successful revolution. One of
them is, "Wait for the right time, and then give them everything you've got". It
would pay you to read that.

You'd also find that Mr. Harold Blacktree, who wrote the article for the
Encyclopedia Britannica states that the Jews conceived and created and
cultivated the Communist movement. And that their energy made them the
spearhead of the movement. Harold Blacktree wrote it and no one knew more about
Communism than he. And the Encyclopedia Britannica for 25 years has been
printing it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [Question inaudible] Freedman: Well, I can't advocate
that you do anything that's criminal, but I can tell you this. You can start
what I call an endless chain. If you can get your friends to write, objectively,
here is the statement: Mr. Kennedy's office gave me this himself. Mr. Smith, who
succeeded Mr. Kennedy, took over his office -- was in his office -- and gave me
this. He delivered this on the 25th, and it says here:

"For release to AM (that means morning papers), August 25th". "Israel is here
to stay. It is a national commitment, special obligation of the Democratic
Party. The White House must take the lead. American intervention. We will act
promptly and decisively against any nation in the Middle East which attacks its
neighbor. I propose that we make clear to both Israel and the Arab states our
guarantee that we will act with whatever force and speed are necessary to halt
any aggression by any nation".

Well, do you call the return of people to their homeland [the Arab
Palestinians] aggression? Is Mr. Kennedy going to do that? Suppose three million
Mexicans came into Texas and drove the six million Texans into the deserts of
Arizona and New Mexico. Suppose these Mexicans were slipped in there armed --
the Texans were disarmed -- and one night they drove them all out of Texas and
declared themselves the Republic of the Alamo. What would the United States say?

Would we say it's aggression for these Texans to try to get their homes back
from the Mexican thieves? Suppose the Negroes in Alabama were secretly armed by
the Soviets and overnight they rose up and drove all the whites into the swamps
of Mississippi and Georgia and Florida ... drove them out completely, and
declared themselves the Republic of Ham, or the Republic of something-or-other.
Would we call it aggression if these people, the whites of Alabama, tried to go
back to their homes?

Would we ... what would we think if the soviet Union said, "No, those Negroes
now occupy them! Leave them there!", or "No, those Mexicans are in Texas. they
declared themselves a sovereign state. Leave them there. You have plenty of room
in Utah and Nevada. Settle somewhere else".

Would we call it aggression if the Alabama whites or the Texans wanted to go
back to their homes? So now, you've got to write to President Kennedy and say,
"We do not consider it aggression in the sense that you use the word, if these
people want to return to their homes as the United Nations -- fifteen times in
the last twelve years -- called upon the Zionists in occupation of Palestine to
allow the Arab Palestinians to return to their former homes and farms". [End of
transcript of Benjamin Freedman speech, given in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in
Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that
time, Common Sense.]

=== end of speech ===

Comments by Peter Myers, 21 Blair St, Watson ACT 2602 Australia; (02)
62475187. Date 31 Oct 1999; update September 19, 2004.

(1) For background information, see Robert John's book Behind the Balfour
Declaration, Institute for Historical Review, 1988. Question: why was the
Balfour Declaration addressed to Lord Rothschild? Why was he, rather than a
rabbi, chosen by Jews to represent the Jewish religion?

(2) Nazis insist that all Jews are one, but evidence shows that they are
sharply divided into secular and religious factions. The former tended to
support Communism, the latter Zionism; the two sides represent rival visions of
world government. The split was openly visible when Rabin was assassinated. The
Balfour Declaration - appealing to Zionists - was made just a few days before
Lenin - appealing to secularists - seized power. When the state of Israel was
created, it became a rival to the USSR, for Jewish loyalties. The 1967 and 1973
wars finalised the split; after 1973, Jews increasingly abandoned the USSR.

(3) The League of Nations was created by the "British" faction of
Internationalists. The USSR did not join, and did a deal with Weimar Germany to
sidestep the League. This deal was agreed in the Treaty of Rapallo, and was
arranged by Jews, Rathenau in Germany, and of course the USSR at that time was
Jewish-run. It seems to prove that there were 2 distinct factions of
Internationalists at that time. Even now, there are two factions: the
laissez-faire individualists, e.g. Lord William Rees-Mogg, who favour a sort of
world anarchy where the rich hold sway, and those who favour a regulatory world
government - this is supported by Soros & the Jewish faction. In general,
the Republicans support the first, while the Democrats support the second.

(4) When Lenin took power, he implemented the "pacifist" line which Bolshevik
Jews had been promoting, and pulled Russia out of the war, as promised to the
German military in return for safe passage. Just a few days earlier, Britain
agreed to the Balfour Declaration, an appeal to the Zionists which also acted as
a counter to Lenin's appeal to the Marxist Jews.

(5) It was Stalin who removed the Jews from power in the USSR; through him,
Russians took charge of a system that had been set up by Jews. Some Jews of
course remained at the top, and foreign Jews remained largely supportive. During
WW2, Stalin toyed with the creation of a Jewish Crimea, to get American Jews
onside.

(6) In 1946, American Jews put a proposal for World Government to him; he
turned it down. Just after World War II, there were two huge armies, those of
the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. If ever there was a time when a world government might
have been formed, this was it: if they had joined up, no other force could have
resisted them. Such a proposal was put in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
over several months in 1946. In his book Has Man a Future?, Bertrand Russell -
an advocate of world government - describes how it developed, first as a
proposal assembled by David Lilienthal, then in a form developed by Bernard
Baruch (p. 25 & p. 97). This "Baruch Plan" was canvassed in the issues of
1946 and put to Stalin. By the end of that year, Stalin had rejected it, on the
grounds that it required submission to Washington, and the Cold War had begun.
Baruch and Lilienthal were Jews; the Jewish backers of the Baruch Plan belong to
the International Socialist faction, which now promotes the World Court, the
Kyoto Protocol, Feminism, and Gay Marriage.

The International Socialist faction opposed the earlier May-Johnson Bill,
which belongs to the Tory faction. On the three factions see british-conspiracy.html.

In the International Socialists' book ONE WORLD or NONE, one
contributor, Harold C. Urey, wrote, "Here was a bill originating in the War
Department ... The May-Johnson Bill was actually similar in intent
and effect to the transfer of power from the German Reichstag to Hitler
... ": one-world-or-none.html.

Documents on the Baruch Plan are shown here: baruch-plan.html.

Stalin himself was murdered during the conflict over the "Doctors' Plot: kaganovich.html.

Also see David Ben Gurion's article in LOOK magazine, January 16, 1962
(scroll down to see text): bengur62.jpg.

(7) When Israel was created, many Russian Jews were drawn to it, showing
their allegiance to it over the USSR. In response, they were further purged in
the USSR, although they were running the satellite governments in Eastern
Europe.

(8) The wars of 1967 and 1973 moved many foreign Jews from being liberals to
being neoconservatives, from Marxism to Zionism. They encouraged Jewish
emigration from the USSR, and co-operated with the Reagan military buildup. In
effect, having lost control of the USSR, they contributed substantially to its
destruction.

(9) It is iromic that Hitler, the leading antisemite in the West, attacked
Stalin, the leading antisemite in the East; and that Zionism has proved stronger
than Marxism - Israel having outlasted the USSR. The "British" faction has three
times successfully used Zionism to split the Jewish allegiance to the USSR: once
with the Balfour Declaration, once with the creation of Israel, once with the
1967-1973 wars. Zionism has been the price for the defeat of Communism. ===

Also see Robert John's book Behind the Balfour Declaration: balfour.html.

Robert John paid tribute to Freedman in his book Behind the Balfour
Declaration: The Hidden Origins of Today's Mideast Crisis (The Institute for
Historical Review, 1822l/2 Newport Blvd., Suite 183 Costa Mesa, California
92627, 1988):

{p. 27} Acknowledgements

To Benjamin H. Freedman, who committed himself to finding and telling
the facts about Zionism and Communism. and encouraged others to do the same.
The son of one of the founders of the American Jewish Committee, which
for many years was anti-Zionist, Ben Freedman founded the League for Peace
with Justice in Palestine in 1946. He gave me copies of materials on the
Balfour Declaration which I might never have found on my own and encouraged my
own research. (He died in April 1984.) ...
{endquote}

A photo of Benjamin Freedman, and of the newspaper he used to write in,
Common Sense, is at Benjamin-Freedman.jpg.

I asked Robert John if he can verify that this photo is a photo of Benjamin
Freedman. He replied, "I do".

I asked if he come across that newspaper, Common Sense, before? He
replied, "I was a subsriber for years. Ed. Conde McGinley".

David Lloyd George (Prime Minister at the time) on why Britain made
the Balfour Declaration: l-george.html.

Added May 7, 2006:

E. J. Dillon in his book The Peace Conference (Hutchinson &
Co., London, 1919) noted that the Peace Conference of Versailles was dominated
by the Anglo-Saxon powers, and that they in turn were dominated by their Jewish
members:

'Of all the collectivities whose interests were furthered at the
Conference, the Jews had perhaps the most resourceful and certainly the most
influential exponents. There were Jews from Palestine, form Poland, Russia,
the Ukraine, Roumania, Greece, Britain, Holland and Belgium; but the largest
and most brilliant contingent was sent by the United States' (p. 10).

'This adverse vote on Mr. Wilson's pet scheme to have religious inequality
proclaimed as a means of hindering sanguinary wars brought to its climax the
reaction of the Conference against what it regarded as a
systematic endeavour to establish the overlordship of the Anglo-Saxon
peoples in the world. ... Most of them believed that a pretext
was being sought to enable the leading Powers to intervene in the
domestic concerns of all the other States ... other Delegates ... feared
that a religious - some would call it racial - bias lay at the root of Mr.
Wilson's policy. It may seem amazing to some readers, but it is none the less a
fact that a considerable number of Delegates believed that the real
influences behind the Anglo-Saxon peoples were Semitic' (p. 422).

'They confronted the President's proposal on the subject of religious
inequality, and, in particular, the odd motive alleged for it, with the
measures for the protection of minorities which he subsequently
imposed on the lesser States, and which had for their keynote to satisfy
the Jewish elements in Eastern Europe. And they concluded that the sequence
of expedients framed and enforced in this direction were inspired by the
Jews, assembled in Paris for the purpose of realizing their carefully
thought-out programme, which they succeeded in having substantially
executed. The formula into which this policy was thrown ... was this:
"Henceforth the world will be governed by the Anglo-Saxon peoples, who, in
turn, are swayed by their Jewish elements". It is difficult to convey an
adequate notion of the warmth of feeling - one might almost call it the heat of
passion - which this supposed discovery generated. The applications of the
theory to many of the puzzles of the past were countless and ingenious. The
illustrations of the manner in which the policy was pursued, and the cajolery
and threats which were said to have been employed in order to ensure its
success, covered the whole history of the Conference, and presented it through a
new and possibly distorted medium. The morbid suspicions aroused may have been
the natural vein of men who had passed a great part of their lives in petty
racial struggles; but according to common account, it was abundantly nurtured at
the Conference by the lack of reserve and moderation displayed by some of the
promoters of the minority clauses who were deficient in the sense of measure'
(pp. 422-3).

Dillon says that the delegates noted that, at that very time, Communist
revolutions were breaking out in Central and East European countries, led
by Communist Jews for whom the religious Jews felt "disgust" (p. 69). If the
religious Jews distanced themselves from the Communist Jews, why did they defend
the latter, instead of repudiating them, when governments cracked down on them?
Why did religious Jews like financier Jacob Schiff want to bring down the Czar's
government, on account of its pogroms against revolutionary Jews, if Schiff was
repudiating those revolutionary Jews?

In his letters (Cyrus Alder, Jacob H Schiff: His Life and Letters,
1928), Schiff reveals an obsession with bringing down the Russian
government. He admits to loaning money to Japan for the 1904-5 war, for a
political purpose: 'I further said, that as a friend of Japan, who had rendered
important services in financing her war loans, in order to enable her to defend
herself and become victorious over Russia, " the enemy of mankind," ...' (vol I,
p. 255). He admits, "The claim that among the ranks of those who in Russia are
seeking to undermine governmental authority there are a considerable number of
Jews may be true" (vol II, p. 131), then goes on to blame and attack the Czar,
rather than repudiate those revolutionary Jews.

Back to the Zionism/Communism index: zioncom.html.

Back to the One World index: oneworld.html.

Write to me at mailto:[email-masked].

HOME