Political persecutions
2007

powered by FreeFind

Holocaust-Persecution-Germany in
panic

Spain withdraws from Germany’s
Holocaust-Persecution-Alliance

Madrid abolishes Thought-Crime-Law

Is this the beginning of the end of Israel's
Holocaust-Terror?

El Mundo, Madrid, 08.11.2007, p. 3 (translated
from Spanish)

Freedom of Expression cannot be denied even to
the Nazis

The
first sentence given in Spain for the crime of genocide apology will also
be the last. Moreover, it will be revoked. The Constitutional Tribunal
decided yesterday to decriminalise a presumption that was included in the
reform of the Penal Code of 1996. Article 607.2 anticipates punishments of
up to two years in jail for whoever, "by any means" diffuses
"ideas or doctrines that deny or justify" the Holocaust.

With
that legislation, a Barcelona court [Juzgado Penal Nº 3, Judge Santiago
Vidal] sentenced a librarian [Pedro Varela] in this city in 1998 who
distributed and commercialised pro Nazi books and videos. Against the
prosecution’s criteria, the Catalonian Court of Appeal [Audiencia
Provincial, three judges] posed the question of unconstitutionality, when
considering that the referenced article limits a fundamental right, the
right to freedom of expression, since it punishes the diffusion of ideas
"without demanding any other element, such as affronts, or inciting to
attack groups."

We
are, undoubtedly, before a correct decision of the Constitutional Court
that reinforces our system of guarantees. Because, no matter how
odious the ideas that justify genocide may appear to us, a free society
cannot deny their right of freedom of expression, unless it includes
inciting to violence. The opposite would be to reinstate the crime of
opinion.

We
expressed ourselves in that respect on the occasion of the closing of
Egin, the pro Eta newspaper. Without talking of the dangers of
establishing limits to the freedom of expression: others will always be
able to use the precedent. It is yet very much alive, for example, the
case of the Mohammed vignettes, that the Islamic collectives have not
hesitated in trying to censor. Where are the limits established? It
will always be preferable to voice the most polemic opinions rather than
exercise censorship. Even more so when society has lots of means
within its reach to refute them by confronting them with
reality.

Pedro Varela in handcuffs then for
selling books containing the truth about Auschwitz and the Jewish
holocaust-tales.

On
November 7, 2007 Spain's Constitutional Court ruled on the case of Pedro
Varela, the well known Spanish human rights activist and publisher. Pedro
Varela was sentenced initially (Nov. 16, 1998) to five years in prison by
a Barcelona court for selling books that were considered to contain
articles of racehate and holocaust-denial. In fact, they were books that
disputed certain aspect of the modern holocaust dogma. On April 30, 1999,
the highest appeal court of Catalonia overturned the verdict and denounced
the original verdict, as well as the law the verdict was based on,
(article 607.2 Spanish penal code) as illegal. Three judges came to the
unanimous conclusion that such a law is violating human rights by
depriving every individual from his or her basic human rights (UN-Charter,
Article 19).

The Spanish Constitutional Court now confirmed
the ruling of the Catalonial Appeal-Court and abolished Spain's
"holocaust-denial-law" because it deprives people from their right to
freely express their opinions. This ruling by the highest judges of Spain
is a blow to Holocaust-Germany that had used all her resources and powers
to form a thought-crime-alliance in Europe. Holocaust-Germany's intention
was to throw everyone in prison who objects to holocaust-lies. It seems
that Germany's fiendish alliance is now starting to crumble. Will this be
the beginning of the end of Germany's and Israel's world-terror-politics?
Will freedom come again for
mankind?

Send the above article to a
friend

Email: Recipient:

Email: Sender

Sender's remarks: