Thursday, May 10, 2007 :

home

about us

donate now

directories

advertise

contact
us

archives

stl jewish news

nation

israel news

international

opinions

jewish
singles

entertainment

calendar

obituaries

lifecycle events

torah thoughts

recipes

classifieds

social action

mitzvah projects

e-jewish light

book excerpts

discussions

jewish links

jlight photos

jgifts

jvideos

party planner

senior services

passover

israel independence

rosh hashanah

hanukkah

local weather

traffic report

movie times

NATION | U.S. HOLOCAUST
MUSEUM

Holocaust archive coming to D.C.

The International Tracing Service's Bad
Arolsen archive. Photo: Courtesy Edwin Black

The International Tracing Service's Bad

U.S. HOLOCAUST
MUSEUM

EDWIN BLACK

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- The International Tracing Service's secret
Holocaust archive at Bad Arolsen, Germany, is preparing to transfer
millions of images of concentration-camp prisoner documents to the
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum under
embargo, according to sources in Germany and the United States
familiar with the transfer.

A May 14 meeting of the 11-nation committee that oversees the
archive is expected to authorize the partial transfer, but only on
condition that an embargo be imposed on accessing the materials.

The embargo is needed because three of the 11 nations that must
ratify the release of the documents -- Greece, Belgium and France --
have yet to sign the authorization agreement.

European sources familiar with the process suggested that Belgium
and France would not sign the agreement until after this summer or
even early next year because of domestic electoral considerations.
Still, the process of data transfer is being accelerated to prepare
for the eventual release.

The Holocaust museum has agreed to keep the documents secret
until authorized by the 11-government committee -- meaning that for
now, at least, the archive's legacy of secrecy will transfer as
well.

Museum officials declined to confirm the information or provide
details on the pending transfer.

JTA has learned, however, that the transfer will include 10
million digitized images of documents to be transported in several
500-gigabyte hard drives that plug into any computer via a simple
USB connection. Small, lightweight, portable drives obviate the
prospect of managing linear miles of archival documents.

The museum plans to assemble the raw images into a database with
a search engine that can be accessed from one or more terminals in
the museum's archive. The gargantuan collection will instantly
double the size of the museum's holdings.

While the museum archive is among the most helpful in the
Holocaust community, its small staff, handful of microfilm-reader
machines and several computer terminals often cannot keep up with
user requests, especially in the summer.

In addition to on-site usage of the archive, some 8,000 requests
come to the museum each year via mail, phone and e-mail, and the
archive staff tries to fulfill those as soon as possible. The
backlog for inquiries at Bad Arolsen in 2006 exceeded 425,000,
according to a recent congressional report prepared by the State
Department.

The Bad Arolsen collection includes records of more than 19
million individuals. Holocaust museum sources admit that massive
linguistic training would be needed before the staff could even
begin to provide information.

Sources suggest that the information would be accessed mainly via
a few on-site computer terminals at the museum. Terminal access
would be strictly prohibited from outside the building, even though
remote access is routinely available for government and historical
databases.

As the museum gears up to receive the trove, several members of
the U.S. Congress, the archival community and members of grassroots
Holocaust groups are questioning why the museum should be given the
documents.

Some 75 percent of Bad Arolsen's holdings provide information on
non-Jewish Holocaust victims, which has led several experts on Nazi
documentation to say that the collection would be more suited to the
National Archives and its regional network.

Critics also are concerned that the museum's unwritten taboo on
issues relating to corporate involvement in the Holocaust is
inconsistent with a collection that largely involves slave labor.
The museum repeatedly has refused to discuss questions involving
IBM, General Motors, Ford, Standard Oil, the Carnegie Institution,
the Rockefeller Foundation and other leading American corporate
icons that funded, supported, participated or profited from the
Holocaust.

Paul Shapiro, the museum's point man for Bad Arolsen, told JTA
that he has quietly assembled a list of companies he has seen in Bad
Arolsen archives, but it remains secret. Museum officials refused to
discuss "Shapiro's list."

Most of all, some survivor groups are asking why the records
would be housed in Washington, where many elderly survivors cannot
access them because of the cost, the logistics and their frail
health.

"I don't think Washington would be an appropriate place for the
documents because the majority of survivors live in New York or
Miami," said Leo Rechter, president of the National Association of
Holocaust Survivors. "We know that 50,000 survivors live in New York
City. Relatively few live in Washington, D.C. The majority of
survivors are not computer savvy.

"From a practical point of view, a copy should be here in New
York where anyone can easily get to it," he said. "We can arrange
rides downtown if need be to ask a clerk to help. But in Washington,
these files would be just another museum attraction."

David Mermelstein, co-chairman of Miami Holocaust Survivors of
Dade County, agreed.

"If the files are in Washington, it would be a problem. It should
be in Florida, Brooklyn, Chicago and Los Angeles, he said. "We have
10,000 survivors here. Most of them of them do not use computers or
they have bad eyesight."

Nonetheless, museum officials said they will not permit archival
access via the open Internet or via terminals at libraries and
universities around the country, the way other databases of
documents are commonly accessed. Museum officials declined to
explain their motives for restricting access.

However, Mermelstein passionately argued for unrestricted access.

"Every day," he said, "there are people dying not knowing what
happened to their loved ones. With the documents here in Florida, we
can ensure that anyone could get a ride to the library so they could
ask someone to check their name."

One congressional source close to the Bad Arolsen transfer asked,
"What am I missing? Why can't these documents be located near the
survivors themselves?"

Edwin Black is The New York Times' best-selling author of the
award-winning "IBM and the Holocaust" and is responsible for a
series of investigations revealing the contents of the ITS archives
at Bad Arolsen. His stories on the subject can be viewed at http://www.ibmandtheholocaust.com/BadArolsenArticles.php.