Honest Media
Today

"News for the discerning
reader"

See the DVDs shocking the nation:

The Persecution of Revisionists: The
Holocaust Unveiled

---------------

Zionist War Crimes: The Case for the
Prosecution

---------------

Judea Declares War: A Critical Look at
WWII

---------------

Understanding Anti-Semitism: Why Do Some
People Dislike Jews?

---------------

Rep. Paul Findley Dares to Speak Out: A
22-Year Veteran Congressman Exposes Israel's
Lobby

---------------

Ritual Murder
Revisited: The Hidden Cult

---------------

The
Line in the Sand

---------------

Human
Sacrifice among the Fanatical Hasidic Jews and Other Cults from Ancient
Times to the Present

---------------

Africa: Blood & Guts

---------------

Mondo
Cane

---------------

Slave
Trade in the World Today

Michael
Collins Piper Live Radio 7-8 PM EST

The Piper
Show Archives

The
Political Cesspool

Prof. Patrick McNally's Controversial
Comments on the Holocaust

Politically Incorrect
Cartoons

Paul Grubach's Writings on the Holocaust,
Etc.

Take a look:

HMT TV

Links to all the
good

videos on the
web

*****************

(This website is hosted by
the above, and supports both Free Speech and America.)

FBI/Congressional Record on
King

The Nonexistent
“Auschwitz Gas Chambers” of Deborah Lipstadt and
Robert Jan van Pelt, Part II

By Paul Grubach
copyright  2006

(Pictured:
Holocaust Propagandists--the "lovely" Deborah
Lipstadt and the "charming" van Pelt)

Preliminary note: This
essay is dedicated to Holocaust revisionist scholar Dr.
Robert Faurisson.  He was the first to
point out the chemical and toxicological
impossibility of these Auschwitz gas chamber
stories.

I

In early 2005, Holocaust
historian Deborah Lipstadt published her widely
admired History on Trial: My Day in Court
with David Irving.1  The book is her
version of events surrounding the high-profile,
2000 libel trial in which British historian David Irving sued
Lipstadt for labeling him a “Holocaust
denier.”  During the duration of the trial,
the media spotlight fell upon the ongoing battle
between revisionist and traditional views of the
Jewish tragedy during W.W.II.  In her
publication, she put forth in laymen's terms
that everyone could understand, straightforward
reasons as to why one should reject Holocaust
revisionist theories and accept the existence of
the homicidal Auschwitz gas chambers.

In Part
I of this two part series, we rebutted a
portion of Lipstadt’s critique of Fred Leuchter,
the American gas chamber expert who carried out
the first ever forensic study of the alleged
Auschwitz gas chambers.  We saw that,
although Leuchter’s pioneering report had its
shortcomings, its findings were essentially
corroborated by the more thorough and exacting
scientific study of the former Max Planck
Institute chemistry doctoral candidate, Germar
Rudolf.

Both reports found only
minuscule traces of hydrogen cyanide gas (HCN)
residue in samples taken from the walls and
floors of the alleged homicidal Auschwitz gas
chambers.  Yet, very large amounts of HCN
residue were found in samples taken from the
non-homicidal disinfestation chambers, where HCN
was used only to delouse mattresses, clothing
and other belongings.  If the structures in
question were actually used as homicidal gas
chambers, one would expect to find a
considerable HCN residue buildup, somewhat
comparable to that found in the non-homicidal
disinfestation chambers.  In both reports
the conclusions are the same.  The alleged
homicidal gas chambers never existed.

Here in Part II, we will
examine the technique and operation of the
alleged Auschwitz gas chambers as put forth by
Professor Lipstadt and one of her main expert
witnesses, Dr. Robert Jan van Pelt, and then ask
the questions: “Is this scientifically
possible?…Did the gas chambers ever exist?”

II

In her attempt to prove that
the Auschwitz gas chambers existed, Lipstadt
critiques the report of Holocaust revisionist
and gas chamber expert Leuchter.  “Had
Irving done some research,” she writes, “he
might have discovered Leuchter’s mistaken
assumption that it took 3,200 parts of HCN per
million to kill humans, when in fact it took far
less.  On the basis of this wrong
calculation, Leuchter had contended that the
residue from such a large amount of gas [would
have necessitated that] the
Sonderkommandos—the inmates who removed
the bodies—would have had to wait twenty-four
hours before entering the chambers.”2

In order to give the reader
the appropriate perspective, let us recreate
Lipstadt’s scenario.  The intended victims
(one to two thousand) were jammed into the gas
chamber.  The deadly hydrogen cyanide was
circulated throughout the chamber, and the
victims were murdered.  The ventilation
systems removed the residual HCN.  Now it
was time for the inmates to go into the chamber
and remove the bodies for cremation.  She
asserts that it was wrong for Leuchter to claim
that the Sonderkommandos would have had
to wait twenty-four hours before entering the
chamber.  This claim and others were wrong,
Lipstadt insists,  “because it actually
took only 10 percent of what Leuchter had
assumed was necessary to kill
humans.”    She claims this is
Leuchter’s fundamental mistake—“the assumption
that it took far more gas to kill humans than to
kill vermin, when, in fact, the reverse was
true."3

Simply put, much more gas was
used in a non-homicidal disinfestation than in a
homicidal gassing.4

The assertions of the late
Jean-Claude Pressac--a widely respected expert
on the Auschwitz gas chambers whose work
attempted to refute the Holocaust
revisionists--undermines Lipstadt.  Pressac
claimed that 12 to 20 grams per cubic meter was
the concentration of the HCN allegedly used in a
homicidal gassing, while 2 to 5 grams per cubic
meter was the concentration used in a
non-homicidal disinfestation/delousing.5
Contradicting Lipstadt, Pressac is claiming that
a greater gas concentration would have been used
to kill humans than that needed to kill vermin
in a delousing.  Once again, Pressac’s
claim contradicts Lipstadt, which suggests that
she and her fellow promoters of the Holocaust
ideology change their story according to the
propaganda needs of the moment.

Enter Dr. Robert Jan van
Pelt, a professor of architecture at the
University of Waterloo, Canada.  He is
widely considered to be the foremost expert on
the technique and operation of the alleged
Auschwitz gas chambers.  In connection with
the defense of Professor Lipstadt at the
Irving-Lipstadt libel trial in London from
January to April 2000, van Pelt testified as an
expert witness on these alleged instruments of
mass murder.  It is readily apparent that
Lipstadt relies heavily on the work of van Pelt
in her attempt to prove the existence of the
Auschwitz gas chambers.  So, any critique
of Lipstadt’s theories must also be a critique
of van Pelt.

In his magnum opus, van Pelt
makes three important claims in regard to the
technique and operation of the homicidal gas
chambers.  First, most of the deadly
hydrogen cyanide gas released into the chamber
was absorbed by the victims’ bodies.
Contradicting Holocaust revisionist claims, he
insists that the ventilation systems of the gas
chambers were efficient enough to remove
virtually all of the remaining HCN after a mass
gassing so that the Sonderkommandos could
enter the chambers within a very short time
after the death of all of the victims in order
to do their work.  In van Pelt’s own words:
“The situation in the gas chambers was
different.  With its powerful ventilation
system and with the fact that most of the
hydrogen cyanide was absorbed by the victims’
bodies, the time [needed to ventilate the gas
chambers so the Sonderkommandos could
safely enter them to remove the bodies] could be
reduced to twenty minutes.”6

Finally, he claims that David
Olere, a French-Jewish deportee to Auschwitz in
1943, is one of the most important eyewitnesses
to the operation of the gas chambers.  In
his own words, the sketches of Olere “provide a
very important visual record of the design and
operation of the gas chamber and incinerators of
Crematorium 3…”7  Indeed, throughout his
entire study he attempts to demonstrate that
Olere is a credible eyewitness by showing how
his sketches are consistent with physical
evidence.

Jean-Claude Pressac also
claimed that the drawings of Olere that will be
examined in this article are an important visual
record of the operation of the homicidal gas
chambers.8  And last but not least, Deborah
Lipstadt attempts to convince her readership
that Olere is a credible eyewitness by showing
how his claims are consistent with the physical
evidence.  In this regard, she refers to
the “drawings by Sonderkommando
David Olere, who, upon liberation sketched the
gas chambers.  The sketches, Robert Jan
[van Pelt] noted, were fully corroborated by the
architectural plans in the Auschwitz Central
Construction Office and the aerial photos.”9

Thus, Lipstadt, Pressac and
van Pelt claim that Olere is perhaps the most
important eyewitness to the alleged mass
gassings, and his sketches, paintings and
drawings provide the world with an accurate
description of the technique and operation of
the Auschwitz gas chambers.  But is this
so?  Professor van Pelt’s omission and
inclusion suggest otherwise.

Let us begin with van Pelt’s
omission.  In his book van Pelt published
some of Olere’s more important sketches
regarding the structure and operation of the
alleged gas chambers, but failed to include one
of his most important drawings.  It is the
painting showing the Sonderkommmandos
opening the gas chamber door and
pulling the bodies out after a mass
gassing.  In the painting, the inmates are
shirtless, and they are not wearing any gas
masks, rubber gloves or protective suits.
Before proceeding, the reader is strongly urged
to view and study the sketch in question.
It is online at the address in this
footnote.  Scroll down to “Document
30.”10

Pressac includes this
painting in his book because it allegedly is an
important visual record of the operation of the
gas chambers.  In regard to this matter, he
wrote: “The fragment of furnace shown on the
left, beyond the two arrows, is purely symbolic
(there was no furnace in the basement) and
spoils a scene which would have been
irreproachable without this addition ‘to make it
better.’”  Pressac is clearly saying that
this sketch is an accurate picture of what
happened, even though it does contain one purely
symbolic item.11

This is a strange omission on
the part of van Pelt. That is to say, he writes
a book about the operation of the gas chambers,
yet omits to include a sketch of
“how-it-really-happened.”  For here we have
an alleged sketch of “how-it-really-was” after a
mass gassing, when the
Sonderkommandos—under the watch and
supervision of Nazi guards--opened the door of
the gas chamber to remove the victims

Perhaps one reason that van
Pelt failed to include this most important
sketch is because he may have realized it could
not have happened the way Olere claimed it
did.  Herewith.

Authoritative industrial
sources confirm the extreme danger surrounding
the use of HCN.  Poisoning can easily occur
by inhalation or skin absorption.12

Leuchter spoke of the dangers
surrounding the handling of just one (!) victim
that was poisoned by HCN in a gas chamber: “You
go in.  The inmate has to be completely
washed down with chlorine bleach or with
ammonia.  The poison exudes right out
through his skin.  And if you gave the body
to an undertaker, you’d kill the
undertaker.  You’ve got to go in; you’ve
got to completely wash the body.”13

Bill
Armontrout, expert witness at the second Ernst
Zundel trial in Toronto and warden of the
Missouri State Penitentiary, which includes an
execution gas chamber, confirms the danger: “One
of the things that cyanide gas does, it goes in
the pores of your skin.  You hose the body
down, see.  You have to use rubber gloves,
and you hose the body down to decontaminate it
before you do anything [else].”14

In his capacity as warden,
Armontrout was personally responsible for
carrying out executions by the use of cyanide
gas, and he was
accepted as an expert witness in a court that
was hostile to Holocaust
revisionism.15

Armontrout
revealed to the Toronto court the safety
precautions necessary to prevent those who
handled the dead criminal's body from being
poisoned by the deadly HCN themselves: “The
ventilation fan ran for approximately one hour
before two officers equipped with Scott
air-packs (self-contained breathing apparatus
which firemen use to enter smoke-filled
buildings) opened the hatch of the gas chamber
and removed the lead bucket containing the
cyanide residue.  The two officers
wore rubberized disposable clothing and long
rubber gloves. They hosed down the condemned
man's body in the chair, paying particular
attention to the hair and the clothing because
of the cyanide residue, then removed him and
placed him on a gurney where further
decontamination took place.”16

Real life tragic incidents
corroborate Leuchter’s and Armontrout’s
claims.

Twenty-three year-old Scott
Dominguez descended into a tank that once held
hydrogen cyanide, and later phosphoric acid, in
order to clean it. When this unfortunate worker
began chipping away at the chemical film and
hosing it down with water, hydrogen cyanide gas
was produced.

Just like the workers in
Olere's drawings who supposedly removed the
corpses from the Auschwitz gas chambers or the
hair and gold from the teeth of gassed victims,
Mr. Dominguez was not working with any safety
equipment--no gas mask or protective suit. He
was overcome by the HCN and had to be carried
away by emergency firefighters. This hapless man
suffers from permanent brain damage because of
his exposure to HCN.17

Another tragic incident
involving firemen during a rescue operation
further supports Leuchter’s and Armontrout’s
assertions.  In June 1995, there was a
dramatic accident in a cave in the French city
of Monterolier.  Three children lit a fire
in a cave, and threw an unexploded bomb they
found from W.W.I that contained hydrogen cyanide
gas into the fire.  The bomb exploded and
released the deadly HCN.  It killed the
children and also four firemen that came to the
rescue.  According to a Professor of
Physical Chemistry, Louis Soulie, the deaths of
the children and firemen, and even the fireman
who was wearing a gas mask, were due to
the fact that hydrogen cyanide dissolves in the
sweat and penetrates the body through the skin,
where it causes poisoning.18

Let us repeat: One French
fireman was wearing a gas mask, but he perished
because the HCN dissolved in his sweat and
penetrated his body.  Even six days after
their deaths, a cyanide concentration twice as
high as the lethal dose was detected in the
blood of the corpses.19

Finally, there is the
incident of suicide by cyanide poisoning that
took place at Grinnell College, Iowa.  A
student committed suicide by swallowing so much
potassium cyanide that the fumes from his body
sickened nine people, all of whom had to be
taken to a hospital.  The potassium cyanide
reacted with the water in his body to produce
cyanide gas.  The fumes that emitted from
his body were so disturbing, that the residence
hall where the tragic incident took place, and
the hospital where the student's body was taken,
had to be aired out.20  Keep in mind these
are fumes that exuded from just one body.
Imagine the fumes exuding from one to two
thousand bodies that were allegedly poisoned by
HCN in the Auschwitz gas chambers!

In order to give the reader
the appropriate perspective, let us recreate van
Pelt’s alleged scenario.  The intended
victims (one to two thousand) were jammed into
the gas chamber.  The deadly hydrogen
cyanide was circulated throughout the chamber,
and the victims were murdered.  The
victims’ bodies absorbed the vast majority of
the deadly gas—it is in the skin, in the hair,
pores and lungs of the victims.  The
ventilation systems quickly removed the residual
HCN.  Now it was time for the inmates to go
into the chamber and remove the dead bodies for
cremation.

Once again, let us give
van Pelt the benefit of the doubt—the victims’
bodies absorbed the vast majority of the deadly
HCN gas.  Here we have over one thousand
dead bodies being saturated with deadly HCN—it
is in the victims' hair, noses, mouths, on their
skin, in their lungs.  As Bill Armontrout
points out, the HCN exudes from the victims'
bodies.

The Sonderkommandos
enter the gas chamber to remove the
bodies.  According to one of van Pelt’s
most important eyewitnesses, David Olere, the
inmates who removed the bodies from the chambers
wore no gas masks, protective suits or rubber
gloves to protect them from the inhalation or
skin absorption of HCN.  They did not even
have shirts on!

The
heavy labor of removing the thousand bodies from
the chambers causes the Sonderkommandos
to sweat.  People who are sweating are even
more prone to absorb the deadly HCN through the
skin.

As the evidence points out,
the victims' bodies exude the deadly HCN—this is
why the body of someone who has died from HCN
poisoning must be hosed down and rigorously
decontaminated.   In neither Pressac’s
nor van Pelt’s authoritative tomes is there any
mention that each victim’s body was hosed down
and thoroughly decontaminated after a mass
gassing, nor is this process included in any of
Olere’s “true-to-life” sketches.

We return to the operation of
the gas chambers.  The
Sonderkommandos enter the chambers to
remove the bodies.  They perspire because
of the hard labor.  This makes them even
more prone to absorb the deadly HCN gas that
exudes from the mass of dead bodies in the gas
chamber.  As Professor Soulie points out,
the firemen died from HCN absorbed by their
sweat, even though one of them was wearing a gas
mask.  Dr. van Pelt’s most important
eyewitness, David Olere, claims in his sketches
that the Sonderkommandos were shirtless
and they wore no rubber gloves, nor did they
wear any gas masks.  This makes them
extremely prone to HCN poisoning by way of skin
absorption and inhalation.

As we saw in the incident of
the suicidal student from Grinnell College, the
fumes from just one body were toxic enough to
cause nine people to go to the hospital.
Imagine the toxicological impact of one to two
thousand dead bodies, all exuding the deadly
HCN, upon the Sonderkommandos and Nazi
guards who were wearing no gas masks or
protective suits.  It would have been
overwhelming!

Thus, the important sketch of
Lipstadt and van Pelt’s most important
eyewitness, David Olere, contains a chemical and
toxicological impossibility.  Although his
discussion of this matter is somewhat vague, van
Pelt seems to implicitly realize that the
Sonderkommandos would have--at the very
least!-- needed gas masks to enter the gas
chamber after they opened the door to remove the
bodies.21  In this particular sketch, the
inmates removing the bodies and the Nazi guards
supervising those executions are not wearing any
gas masks. The inmates dragging the dead bodies
are even shirtless!

Perhaps this is the reason
that van Pelt failed to publish this most
important drawing of Olere.  He may have
realized that the sketch of his most important
eyewitness to the operation of the gas chambers
contained a physical impossibility.  In
other words, he may not have published this most
important sketch because he did not want to give
Holocaust revisionists ammunition to use against
the Auschwitz gas chamber story.

But it gets even worse for
Lipstadt and van Pelt.  Let us now turn to
a sketch of David Olere that van Pelt did
include in his book—the sketch that shows the
Sonderkommandos inside of the gas chamber
after a gassing collecting the hair and gold
teeth.  Alongside of the
Sonderkommandos is a Nazi guard, only
part of his leg and jackboot showing.  Once
again, the Sonderkommandos are not
wearing any gas masks, rubber gloves, or
protective suits to protect them from the deadly
HCN that would have exuded from the bodies of
the over one thousand victims.  Before
proceeding, the reader is strongly urged to view
and study the sketch under discussion.  It
is online at the address in this
footnote.22

We return to the assertions
of the expert witness, warden Bill
Armontrout.  The body of a gassed criminal
is hosed down and decontaminated, and especially
close attention is paid to the hair, as it is
here that much of the deadly HCN collects.
Yet, in Olere’s sketch, we see the
Sonderkommandos—with no rubber gloves,
gas masks or protective suits—putting their
hands in the hair of the pile of victims!

Remember, van Pelt claims
that the vast majority of the deadly gas was
absorbed by the victims’ bodies—only to exude
from the hair and skin of the victims and
ultimately kill the Sonderkommandos who
collected the hair and gold teeth!
Nowhere in van Pelt’s tome is it mentioned that
each and every body was hosed down and
decontaminated before the hair and gold in the
teeth were removed.  Nor does the
“how-it-really-happened” sketch of Olere show
the Sonderkommandos—with gas masks and
protective suits--hosing down and
decontaminating each and every body, which would
have been necessary to prevent poisoning from
the ocean of deadly HCN that would have exuded
from the over one thousand dead
bodies.

We return to Lipstadt.
She is saying that because only 320 parts per
million (10% of what Leuchter claimed) was
necessary to kill humans, the ventilation
systems could have removed the residual gas
quickly, and the inmates could have entered the
chambers a very short time after the homicidal
gassings to remove the victims for
cremation.  All would have run relatively
smoothly.

Dr. van Pelt claims that 300
parts per million of HCN is lethal to humans,
and allegedly, this is the concentration the
Nazis used in the gas chambers.23
The 300 parts per million necessary to
kill humans is a little less than the Lipstadt’s
threshold of 320 parts per million.  This
suggests that even small amounts of gas that
would have exuded from the skin, nose, mouth,
and hair of one (!) dead body could have killed
any Sonderkommando, or any of the Nazi
guards that allegedly supervised those
executions.

Even worse for the
Lipstadt/van Pelt scenario, the amount of HCN
exuding from each of the over one thousand
bodies would have, in the end, accumulated to an
ocean of gas to poison both the
Sonderkommandos and the Nazi guards by
skin absorption or inhalation.

At the risk of sounding
redundant, let us again recreate the gassing
scenario of Lipstadt and van Pelt in order for
the reader to clearly understand the chemical
and toxicological impossibility of the operation
of the Auschwitz gas chambers.  One
thousand to two thousand victims are herded into
the gas chamber.  The doors are closed, and
the deadly HCN is circulated throughout the
chamber.  The gas murders the
victims.  As van Pelt claims, their bodies
absorb most of the gas.  The residual,
remaining amount is extracted from the chamber
by the powerful ventilation systems.

The door of the gas chamber
is opened.  According to the most important
eyewitness, David Olere, the inmates who entered
the chamber to remove the bodies for cremation
wore no gas masks, rubber gloves or protective
suits to protect them from HCN poisoning by way
of inhalation or skin absorption.  The
inmates that entered the chamber to collect the
hair of the victims wore no gas masks, rubber
gloves, or protective suits to protect them from
poisoning by way of inhalation or the skin
absorption of the deadly HCN.  The Nazi
guards that supervised these executions wore no
gas masks or protective suits.

The Sonderkommandos
are confronted with one to two thousand bodies,
all saturated with deadly HCN.  They do
their work with no gas masks, rubber gloves or
protective suits.  According to van Pelt,
the vast majority of the gas was absorbed by the
victims’ bodies, only to exude from those same
bodies and poison anyone who was not wearing a
gas mask, protective suit and rubber
gloves.

One of the important points
here is this.  Even if we give Lipstadt and
van Pelt the benefit of the doubt, and assume
that all of their assertions on the operation of
the “gas chambers” are all correct, their gas
chamber operation scenario is still virtually
impossible.

If, without gas masks, rubber
gloves and protective suits, it is extremely
dangerous to handle just one (!) body saturated
with the deadly HCN; if only one dead body
saturated with the deadly HCN can exude enough
toxic fumes to send nine people to the hospital,
it would be almost impossible to handle one to
two thousand dead bodies saturated with HCN
without gas masks, protective suits and rubber
gloves.

The inmates in Olere’s
sketches that allegedly handled those one to two
thousand dead bodies without gas masks, rubber
gloves, and protective suits would have been
poisoned by way of inhalation or skin
absorption.  The physical evidence provided
by the three examples of HCN poisoning—the Scott
Dominguez incident, the Grinnell College
suicide, and the children in the cave
incident—support this revisionist claim.
Thus, Lipstadt and van Pelt’s most important
eyewitness puts forth an impossible
scenario.

It does no good to counter
the revisionists by saying: “Well, the drawings
of David Olere are just symbolic of what really
transpired.  He was engaging in ‘artistic
license’ when he depicted the
Sonderkommandos with no gas masks, rubber
gloves and protective suits.”  If this is
so, then his sketches are not an accurate
representation of the operation of the gas
chambers.  And, Dr. van Pelt’s claim that
Olere’s sketches provide a very important visual
record of the operation of the gas chamber of
Crematorium 3 is not true.

Furthermore, it does no good
to counter the revisionists by saying: “Well,
the Nazis didn’t care about the lives of the
Sonderkommandos, so they did not have to
use the safety precautions of gas masks,
protective suits and rubber gloves.”  Quite
the contrary.  The Nazi guards that
allegedly supervised those executions had to
make certain that the Sonderkommandos
quickly removed all of the bodies to make room
for the next batch of victims.  Thus, they
would have had to make certain that the inmates
stayed alive at least long enough to “get the
job done.”  That is, in order for them to
stay alive long enough to complete the job, they
would have had to wear gas masks and
protective suits.  Furthermore, in order to
protect the lives of the Nazi guards that
allegedly supervised those executions, it would
have been necessary for them to wear gas masks
and protective suits.

Finally, let us assume that
what Jean-Claude Pressac claimed is the
truth.  The Sonderkommandos that
entered the gas chambers after a mass gassing
wore gas masks.24  Even if we assume this
to be so, the “Auschwitz gas chamber” story is
still impossible.  This still leaves open
the fact that HCN poisoning can occur by skin
absorption.  Nowhere in sketches of Olere
or in the authoritative tomes of van Pelt or
Pressac is it ever claimed that the
Sonderkommandos wore rubber gloves or
protective suits to protect them from the skin
absorption of the ocean of deadly HCN that would
have exuded from the myriad of bodies in the gas
chambers.

The reader is asked to recall
the story of the four firemen who perished from
the skin absorption of HCN, in spite of the fact
that one of them was wearing a gas mask.
The reader should simply consider the
devastating toxic effect upon the
Sonderkommandos, all wearing gas masks,
when they put their bare hands into the HCN
saturated hair and mouths of the over one
thousand victims.  Poisoning by skin
absorption would have occurred, because they
never decontaminated each body and they wore no
protective suits or rubber
gloves.

What I reveal here is nothing
new.  As far back as the 1970s, Holocaust
revisionist scholar Robert Faurisson revealed to
the world the chemical and toxicological
impossibility of this Auschwitz gas chamber
legend.

Ironically, it is, I believe,
a very favorable sign for the future of
Holocaust revisionism that most of the Western
power elites refuse to debate the Holocaust
revisionists, but only resort to name calling,
threats of career destruction and jail
sentences.  It suggests to the world that
Holocaust revisionism cannot be defeated with
evidence and reason.  The opponents of
revisionism are intellectually impotent, and
they cannot defeat revisionism with facts,
evidence and logic.  The “Holocaust” is a
weak and flimsy ideology that needs special
laws, threats of career destruction and jail
sentences to protect it.

Footnotes

Deborah E. Lipstadt,
History on Trial: My Day in Court with David
Irving (HarperCollins Publishers, 2005).

Ibid, p.122.

Ibid, pp. 122, 131.

Ibid. p.36.

Jean-Claude Pressac,
Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of
the Gas Chambers (Beate Klarsfeld
Foundation, 1989), pp.16, 18, 31.  Online:
http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0011.htm

Robert Jan van Pelt, The
Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving
Trial (Indiana University Press, 2002),
p.275.

Ibid, p.173.

Pressac, p. 493.
Scroll down to Documents 30 and 31.
Online: http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm

Lipstadt, p. 140.

Online: http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm

Pressac, p.493.  Scroll
down to Document 30.  Online: http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm

Zyklon for Pest Control:
Information brochure of the German Society for
Pest Control on the use of its insecticide
Zyklon B.   Reprinted in
Frederick A. Leuchter, Robert Faurisson,
Germar Rudolf, The Leuchter Reports: Critical
Edition (Theses & Dissertations Press,
2005), pp. 75-88.  Online: http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/tlr/

Stephen Trombley, The
Execution Protocol (Crown Publishers, 1992),
p.98.

Ibid., p.102.

Barbara Kulaszka, ed.,
Did Six Million Really Die?: Report of the
Evidence in the Canadian ‘False News’ Trial of
Ernst Zundel—1988 (Samisdat Publishers,
1992), p.351.  Online: http://www.zundelsite.org/english/dsmrd/dsmrd31armontrout.html

Ibid., p.352.  Online:
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/dsmrd/dsmrd31armontrout.html

Department of Justice
National News Release, 10 May 1999.
Reprinted in Germar Rudolf, The Rudolf
Report: Expert Report on Chemical and Technical
Aspects of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz
(Theses & Disserations Press, 2003),
pp.18-19.  Online: http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/1.html#1.2.
For a list of other articles on this matter, see
the references in footnote 20 on p.19 of Rudolf.

See the article about this
in Rudolf, p.20.  Online: http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/1.html#1.2

Ibid.

See Rudolf, pp. 17-18.
Minnesota State University, Mankato Reporter,
Online Edition, 10 October 1998, “Suicide fumes
sicken nine Iowa students.”  Online: http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/1.html#1.2

Robert Jan van Pelt, p.275.

Pressac, p.493. Scroll down
to Document 31.  Online: http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm

Robert Jan van Pelt, p.362.

Pressac, p.16.  Online:
http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0016.htm

Send mail by filling out the form on the Feedback page with
questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: 06/05/06