
The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
1680
Index pages
by Date of Document
by Date of Release
2010-03-10
2011-03-05
2011-03-15
2012-01-29
2012-02-27
2012-02-28
2012-02-29
2012-03-01
2012-03-02
2012-03-03
2012-03-04
2012-03-05
2012-03-06
2012-03-07
2012-03-08
2012-03-09
2012-03-10
2012-03-11
2012-03-12
2012-03-13
2012-03-14
2012-03-15
2012-03-16
2012-03-17
2012-03-19
2012-03-20
2012-03-23
2012-03-25
2012-03-26
2012-03-27
2012-04-01
2012-04-02
2012-04-24
2012-04-26
2012-04-30
2012-05-10
2012-06-18
2012-06-20
2012-07-01
2012-07-24
2012-07-28
2012-07-29
2012-07-30
2012-07-31
2012-08-01
2012-08-02
2012-08-05
2012-08-06
2012-08-07
2012-08-08
2012-08-09
2012-08-10
2012-08-11
2012-08-12
Our Partners
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand
Community resources
courage is contagious
The Global Intelligence Files
On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.
Re: INSIGHT - AUSTRALIA - Independents split - CN65
Released on 2012-02-29 14:00 GMT
Email-ID | 1800240 |
---|---|
Date | 2010-09-07 18:19:55 |
From | matt.gertken@stratfor.com |
To | analysts@stratfor.com |
List-Name | analysts@stratfor.com |
controlled fiber optic broadband network. The security issue has not
received nearly as much debate or discussion as the political debates
about cost and competitiveness, even though it was frequently referred to
during the China-Google debates. The criticism by some activists has been
that Oz will have complete control over information. The complaint by
national security types has been that a foreign sponsored hacker (such as
China) would access a gold mine by breaking into this network, and that it
should be coupled with a more comprehensive cyber-security plan.
we need more info about it but here is the Oz House of Reps' latest report
on cyber crime which was oft-cited in questions relating to this:
http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/coms/cybercrime/report.htm
essentially the security risk argument is that a centrally administered
broadband network would be more vulnerable to foreign attack.
Of course will defer to Jen's source on this and would very much like to
hear more details/specifics (or links to places to find them) about the
security risks.
Peter Zeihan wrote:
how is the NBN a security risk?
On 9/7/2010 9:44 AM, Antonia Colibasanu wrote:
National Broadband Network