

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08WELLINGTON114, PIF MINISTERIAL MEETING ON FIJI
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08WELLINGTON114.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08WELLINGTON114 | 2008-03-28 02:00 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO6854
PP RUEHAP RUEHKN RUEHKR RUEHMJ RUEHNZ RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0114/01 0880200
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 280200Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5164
INFO RUEHAP/AMEMBASSY APIA 0455
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5152
RUEHKN/AMEMBASSY KOLONIA 0017
RUEHKR/AMEMBASSY KOROR 0006
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 0195
RUEHMJ/AMEMBASSY MAJURO 0119
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0322
RUEHPB/AMEMBASSY PORT MORESBY 0733
RUEHSV/AMEMBASSY SUVA 0730
RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1644
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RHHJJAA/JICPAC HONOLULU HI
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0125
RUEKJCS/OSD WASHINGTON DC
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000114
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/ANP
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL FJ UN NZ XV
SUBJECT: PIF MINISTERIAL MEETING ON FIJI
REF: STATE 30331
¶1. (SBU) Summary. On March 26, Pacific Island Forum (PIF)
Foreign Ministers met in Auckland to review the situation in
Fiji, in particular to assess progress by the Interim
Government (IG) towards meeting the commitments made by
Commodore Bainimarama to PIF leaders in Tonga in October
¶2007. In an outcome document, PIF officials were united in
outlining their strong concerns about the IG's degree of
progress towards the holding of elections in the first
quarter of 2009, human rights issues surrounding the media
and the judiciary that may impinge on the environment
necessary for free and fair elections, and the continued IG
focus on the People's Charter process, which PIF Ministers
worry may divert focus from election preparations. Fiji
Interim Foreign Minister Nailatikau, head of the IG
delegation, criticized visa sanctions, emphasized the
importance of the People's Charter to national reconciliation
and the election process, and blamed the international
community for the lack of progress to date. Commonwealth
representative Sir Paul Reeves briefed the ministers on his
effort to encourage political dialogue. Reeves intends to
visit Suva again in late April. The ministers agreed
unanimously to augment the monitoring of the Fiji situation
via a Ministerial Contact Group. Nailatikau promised an IG
timetable for elections by mid-April. End Summary.
Auckland PIF Ministerial Keeps Pressure on Fiji IG
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶2. (SBU) When Pacific Island Forum leaders met in Tonga in
October 2007, they instructed PIF Foreign Ministers to meet
early in 2008 to review progress by the IG towards Commodore
Bainimarama's promise of a free and fair parliamentary
election in the first quarter of 2009. The March 26
ministerial in Auckland considered a report by the PIF-Fiji
Joint Working Group and a presentation by interim Foreign
Minister Ratu Epeli Nailatikau. Nailatikau complained
bitterly about visa sanctions, specifically mentioning "the
U.S., Australia, and New Zealand." He reaffirmed the IG's
election commitment, but also emphasized the IG view that the
People's Charter process is an essential pre-election step
for Fiji's future. It will be a "strategic framework" for
future governments and is the military's "exit strategy."
Several Pacific Island Country (PIC) representatives queried
Nailatikau about a seeming contradiction between the
"commitment" to elections and the People's Charter. They
also inquired about human-rights problems. Nailatikau
reportedly stuck closely to the standard IG brief.
Thereafter, the IG delegation was asked to leave the room.
(Note: We hear the IG tried hard the night before to be
allowed to stay in place throughout, but PIF ministers,
citing Tonga as precedent, said "no." End Note.)
¶3. (SBU) In subsequent discussion, Australia and New Zealand
raised their well-known concerns about the state of affairs
in Fiji; and a good number of Island ministers, including
those from PNG, Solomon Islands, Niue, Samoa, and the Cooks,
reportedly also raised serious worries about the IG's
approach to governance and its half-hearted efforts to
prepare for free and fair elections. Several, including
Samoa, praised the visa sanctions imposed by Australia, New
Zealand, the U.S., and others as helping focus the IG on
important issues. PNG proposed, and ministers approved,
setting up a Ministerial Contact Group (MCG) to take
monitoring of IG electoral preparations to a higher level in
the lead-up to the next PIF leaders meeting in Niue in
August. Contact Group minister members will be Australia,
New Zealand, PNG, Samoa, Tonga, and Tuvalu. Reportedly, the
MCG came about because ministers saw a need for more clout
than the PIF-Fiji Working Group could provide, but the IG and
some other PIC governments had objections to resuscitating
last year's Eminent Persons Group.
WELLINGTON 00000114 002 OF 003
¶4. (SBU) In their deliberations, ministers judged the draft
outcomes document as "too soft" on the IG and ordered the
toughening of language throughout. The final document,
agreed to unanimously, outlines the PIF's strong view that
the IG is expected to fulfill Bainimarama's election promises
in Tonga. (The Commodore promised that all parties will be
allowed to compete under the current constitution's rules in
free and fair polls and that the military will respect the
outcome.) The document expresses concern about election
preparations to date as well as about human rights
developments that could undermine conditions necessary for a
free and fair electoral process. It welcomes the IG's
promise to provide a timetable for elections by the end of
the second week in April as well as the announcement that an
elections supervisor will be appointed shortly. Finally, it
announces the Ministerial Contact Group and expresses
appreciation for a parallel effort by Sir Paul Reeves to
facilitate dialogue.
Commonwealth/Reeves Effort for Political Dialogue
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶5. (SBU) During the Ministerial, Sir Paul Reeves was invited
to brief delegations on his effort, at Commonwealth urging,
to foster a political dialogue in Fiji among the leading
political players from all sides. The decision of
Bainimarama and interim Finance Minister Chaudhry not to
participate in a group meeting when Reeves visited Suva in
early March was disappointing; but Reeves received a letter
from Bainimarama early on March 26 inviting a follow-on visit
and expressing appreciation for the conversations that had
occurred. In that light, Reeves intends to return to Suva in
late April to try again to bring the parties together for
talk. (Note: We heard from several well-placed sources at
the Auckland meeting that it was Chaudhry and interim
Attorney General Sayed-Khaiyum who discouraged Bainimarama
from participating in the Reeves dialogue in March. Those
sources of pressure, and Bainimarama's own unwillingness to
engage deposed PM Qarase face-to-face, could still impede
dialogue, but Reeves told us he is willing to give his effort
at least one more shot. End Note.)
Australia, New Zealand, Other PICs Pleased with Outcome
--------------------------------------------- ----------
¶6. (SBU) The PIF did not permit non-PIF members to sit in on
the meeting, but USG officials spoke with a number of
participants before and after to make USG views clear and to
solicit comments on the state of play. Australian Foreign
Minister Smith, attending his first PIF meeting on Fiji, told
us he was very satisfied with the way the region continued to
stand firm on the need for proper elections, without
interference from the People's Charter process. He sees the
Ministerial Contact Group essentially as a contingency
mechanism to be invoked as necessary to keep pressure on and
to ensure leaders at the PIF meeting in Niue are fully
informed. New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade
(MFAT) officials said the results were as good they could
have hoped for, and FM Peters was happy. They said it was
clear before the meeting that PIC governments were not
pleased with Fiji, and ministers made that clear both when
the IG delegation was in the room and even more so
afterwards. The IG could not easily conclude that the
process was being driven by New Zealand and Australia. We
heard from several PIF delegations similar expressions of
satisfaction with the continued PIF unity of concern and of
purpose.
¶7. (SBU) The Tonga, Niue, PNG, Australia and New Zealand
Foreign Ministers held a post-meeting press conference. They
stressed that the region is expecting the IG to fulfill
Bainimarama's promises in Tonga, and the PIF will be
optimistic about IG intentions unless otherwise warranted.
That said, ministers noted skepticism -- particularly
WELLINGTON 00000114 003 OF 003
surrounding the IG emphasis on the People's Charter process
-- that only the Fiji IG can overcome by living up to its
commitments to the international community. The Ministerial
Contact Group is to help monitor IG progress and promote
constructive and productive dialogue. Smith noted that a MCG
visit to Fiji may not be necessary if the IG makes sufficient
progress on its own, pre-Niue. He offered that, in the first
instance, the FMs will encourage the Reeves effort. Niue PM
Vivian Young said that the Ministerial Contact Group would
raise the level of dialogue with IG authorities, bumping it
up from the working level.
Comment
-------
¶8. (SBU) The PIF Ministers fulfilled their mission
admirably. They, and not just Australia and New Zealand,
made clear they continue to expect the IG to move
expeditiously with a timetable to fulfill its commitment to
facilitate acceptable elections by March 2009. The unified
PIF message to the IG delegation in Auckland was impressive,
and it seemed clearly to have affected Nailatikau and his
delegation. When they departed the meeting, all
IG-delegation faces, including Nailatikau's, looked somber
and subdued, and they declined to do a media conference. The
IG undoubtedly hoped to hear expressions of understanding.
That didn't happen. Instead, they faced a solid front of PIF
delegations that were not inclined to give the IG the benefit
of the doubt and who were pressing the same themes the USG
has been pressing.
MCCORMICK