

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09OTTAWA581, Canada's Foreign Investment Reforms Create A More Open
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09OTTAWA581.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09OTTAWA581 | 2009-07-27 19:08 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO7520
PP RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHMT RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0581/01 2081908
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 271908Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9705
INFO RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 2007
RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000581
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR E, EB/DCT, WHA/EX, WHA/CAN
STATE PASS USTR (SULLIVAN)
COMMERCE FOR ITA/MAC (WORD AND BARRAGAN)
TREASURY FOR IA (NEPHEW)
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EFIN ETRD EINV EIND PREL CA
SUBJECT: Canada's Foreign Investment Reforms Create A More Open
Market But Do Not Spare U.S. Steel from Canadian Court Action
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY
¶1. (SBU) Summary: Canada's July 17 federal court action against U.S.
Steel attempts to force the company to meet the production and
employment commitments it made to the Federal Government in 2007 in
exchange for permission to take over Canada's Stelco. At that time,
the GOC exercised its legal right make foreign acquisition of
Canadian assets conditional on the fulfillment of certain
performance requirements. However, at the same time as the Federal
Industry Ministry is cracking down on investor behavior, the
Conservative government is also implementing changes to the national
investment regime that would make Canada a more open and transparent
investment destination for foreign investors. Although most of the
proposed regulations are not controversial, some foreign investors
will be dismayed that Canada's new security requirements demand
increased disclosure of confidential information and increase the
possibility that the government might disallow an investment on
security grounds even after the transaction has been completed. End
summary.
U.S. Steel
----------
¶2. (U) On July 17, Minister of Industry Tony Clement announced that
the Government of Canada was launching an action against U.S. Steel
in the Superior Court of Canada to remedy an alleged breach of
Canadian investment law. The American steelmaker's 2007 acquisition
of Ontario-based Stelco was predicated upon the company maintaining
minimum levels of Canadian employment, capital expenditures and
production. In May 2009, the industry minister threatened legal
action after U.S. Steel cut production and laid off employees at its
Canadian operations in tandem with the global economic recession.
ICA Undertakings
----------------
¶3. (U) Canada's Investment Canada Act (ICA) permits the Industry
Minister to bind foreign investors to obligations on matters such as
local production and employment levels in order to ensure that the
investment provides a 'net benefit' to Canada. Following a recent
exchange of letters with the company, Clement stated, "I remain of
the view that U.S. Steel is not complying with its undertakings, and
I am not satisfied by its explanations for non-compliance." If the
Canadian court finds that an investor has breached an ICA
undertaking, remedies include curing the breach, fines or forced
divestiture of the investment. In this case, the Industry Minister
has asked the courts to levy a C$10,000-a-day fine against U.S.
Steel, retroactive to the November 2008 Canadian layoffs.
¶4. (SBU) Although the terms of the undertakings a company makes to
the government are generally confidential, the Canadian media is
reporting that when U.S. Steel bought the bankrupt Stelco in 2007
for C$1.16 billion, it promised to boost production at Stelco mills
by 10 per cent in each of the first three years of ownership and to
maintain 3,105 full-time employees. Today, some 2,400 workers have
either retired or been laid off by U.S. Steel, and the company has
halted steel output in Hamilton and Nanticoke, Ont. In its court
filing, the government alleges that the company has defaulted on 77
percent of its employment commitment. (Comment: Since U.S. Steel
Qpercent of its employment commitment. (Comment: Since U.S. Steel
has not responded publically to the GOC court action it is not known
whether the company's undertakings included any exemptions for
exogenous economic downturns. End comment.) This is the first time
the Canadian government has taken a foreign company to court over
promises made as part of an acquisition (although it has threatened
similar action against the Brazilian mining company Vale Inco which
has laid off approximately 400 workers).
¶5. (SBU) Some Canadians are criticizing the government's move for
the negative message it will send to other potential foreign
investors. A Globe and Mail editorial argues that although Ottawa
may be legally entitled to its actions, Stelco's 2007 commitments
are unreasonable in today's volatile economic climate. The paper
speculates that Canada's hard line against Stelco may be intended as
a warning to General Motors and Chrysler that they will be similarly
held to the employment commitments they made in exchange for federal
OTTAWA 00000581 002 OF 003
bailout funds. Nevertheless, the Globe concludes, "Ottawa should
refrain from intervening in future foreign takeovers. In a world
where economic volatility can render hard-won promises
impracticable, it simply isn't worth it."
¶6. (SBU) Christopher Sands, a senior fellow at Washington's Hudson
Institute, notes that the Canadian action puts U.S. Steel in the
difficult position of having to sideline one government's policy in
order to comply with another's. The steel industry has been hit
hard by the slump in construction and one of U.S. Steel's best
customers is the U.S. government, which has imposed strict Buy
American rules. This means that U.S. Steel has a stronger incentive
than usual to cut Canadian production to maintain higher volumes at
U.S. mills. Consequently, Sands suggests, the future decisions of
U.S Steel "will be determined by which government they fear more."
Changes to ICA
--------------
¶7. (U) In spite of the actions regarding Stelco, the Harper
Government is moving forward with commitments to open up the
Canadian economy to more foreign investment. In March 2009
preliminary changes to the Investment Canada Act (ICA) were
introduced as part of the government's budget legislation. These
were followed on July 11, 2009 with a number of proposed regulations
to give effect to the investment changes contained in the budget.
Among the most important amendments are increased investment
thresholds -- to determine which foreign investments will be subject
to a full governmental review -- and the imposition of a new
national security screening mechanism. Canada also plans to
eliminate differential review thresholds for transportation and
financial services and uranium production. The proposed regulations
will take effect after a 30-day comment period and do not require a
vote in the House of Commons.
Higher thresholds, new formulas, same cultural barriers
--------------------------------------------- ----------
¶8. (SBU) The ICA requires that direct foreign takeovers of large
Canadian companies be reviewed and approved based on whether or not
the investment constitutes a "net benefit to Canada." (Comment:
The net benefit criteria are not spelled out in legal terms and are
open to a range of interpretations depending on the disposition of
the government in power. End comment.) Frequently, the government
will ask the foreign investor to provide negotiated undertakings
such as those assumed by U.S. Steel. Under the old rules, an ICA
review is required for any direct takeover by foreign investors from
a WTO country of a Canadian company with more than C$312 million in
gross assets. The new regulations will increase the review
threshold, first to C$600 million and ultimately to C$1 billion by
the end of four years.
¶9. (SBU) Although the higher thresholds mean fewer foreign
investments will likely be subject to full review, all foreign
investments must be notified to the government. Also the
methodology for determining the review threshold will be expanded
from considering only the asset value of the proposed acquisition to
a broader evaluation based on a company's market capitalization,
assets, and liabilities. Despite the new regulations, Canada's
Qassets, and liabilities. Despite the new regulations, Canada's
pre-existing regime banning virtually all foreign investment in
cultural industries remains unchanged, even though the 2008
government report Compete to Win recommended reforms in this area.
Enhanced national security requirements
---------------------------------------
¶10. (U) Under the proposed regulations, a foreign investor will have
to disclose the names of directors, the five highest paid officers,
any person or entity holding more than ten percent of the investor's
equity or voting rights, and the name of any foreign state that
holds a direct or indirect ownership interest in the investor, even
minor shareholders. The security disclosure requirements apply to
all foreign investments (including acquisitions and the
establishment of new businesses), even those that fall below the
OTTAWA 00000581 003 OF 003
review threshold.
¶11. (SBU) The new regulations set out time frames for the government
to invoke the national security screening process - generally within
45 days after a notice of investment or review application has been
filed. However, in cases of investments valued below the applicable
review threshold, the government has up to 45 days after an
investment has been implemented to determine whether it should be
submitted to a full security screening. (Comment: Presumably, this
longer period exists to prevent smaller acquisitions that are not
subject to other forms of review from slipping under the radar and
to provide adequate time for the government to obtain more
information about the proposed investment and investor. End
comment.)
¶12. (U) The security review could take as long as four months and
will be conducted primarily by Canada's security and intelligence
agencies. If an investment is found to be a threat to national
security then the investment can be unwound or restricted.
Implications of Canadian changes for US investors
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶13. (SBU) Although the subjective net benefits test has not been
eliminated from Canada's foreign investment review process, the
higher review threshold means that fewer investments will be
subjected to it. As well, the addition of a more transparent
process to ensure that investments are not injurious to national
security brings Canada's policy more closely into alignment with
that of the United States. The clarification of Canada's security
requirements comes too late to affect the failed 2008 attempt by
US-based Alliant Techsystems, Inc. to take over the space-assets arm
of Canada's MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates Ltd (MDA), which
Ottawa vetoed on national security grounds. However during a
meeting with Embassy officials last week, a senior Industry Canada
official speculated that if the new security framework had been in
place at the time of Alliant's bid, the outcome could have been
quite different.