

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07BERLIN244, JANUARY 23 MEETING OF G-8 GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07BERLIN244.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07BERLIN244 | 2007-02-07 10:41 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Berlin |
VZCZCXYZ0014
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHRL #0244/01 0381041
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 071041Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6948
INFO RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 7911
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 1693
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 0953
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 8436
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 0190
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 1363
UNCLAS BERLIN 000244
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR ISN/CTR, EUR, WHA/CAN, AND EAP/J
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL ETTC KNNP CBW TRGY GM JA RS CA
SUBJECT: JANUARY 23 MEETING OF G-8 GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP
WORKING GROUP IN BERLIN
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The G-8 Global Partnership Working Group
(GPWG) met January 23 in Berlin under the German Presidency.
The Chair informed partners that the next meeting, February
27-28, would focus on the mid-term review of the 10-year
Global Partnership (GP) program, with the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and NGOs being invited to attend.
The Chair then addressed preparations for a review and
assessment report of the GP's first five years, noting the
need to produce a review prior to the June 6-8 G-8 Summit.
After the Chair requested responses to a German-produced
questionnaire and a French-prepared matrix of GP projects,
the Russian delegation stated it opposed any reference in a
GP document to Russia as "a proliferation threat." Following
that discussion, the group discussed the review document and
the status of Chemical Weapons Destruction (CWD) projects in
Russia, with the Russian delegation complaining about the
slow pace of receiving funds. The Russian delegation next
gave a presentation on removing and securing Radioisotopic
Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs), and the group discussed the
status of decommissioning and dismantling Russian nuclear
submarines. Canada's delegation announced the construction
of a biosecurity facility in Bishkek; the U.S. delegation
raised the issue of the future of the science centers in
Russia and Ukraine. The Chair closed with the announcement
that Germany would send procedural information concerning the
review process to the delegations and requested they consider
options for presenting the review report at the G-8 Summit.
End Summary.
¶2. (SBU) German MFA Commissioner for Economic Affairs and
Sustainable Development Viktor Elbling chaired the opening
session and began by informing the delegations that the
GPWG's February 27 session will include presentations by NGOs
or other invitees selected from a list of proposed invitees
by GP members. Elbling also announced that Germany had
invited the IAEA to give a general overview of the global
threat of unsecured nuclear material, that Germany's Federal
Intelligence Service (BND) will contribute a segment on the
threat of nuclear material to Germany's overall presentation,
and that all partners are invited to include input from their
intelligence services in their presentations. He added that
the think tank, Foundation for Science and Policy, (Stiftung
fuer Wissenschaft und Politik, SWP), is the German NGO
designated to address the first day of February's session.
Elbling asked all members to respond by January 31 with their
proposed invitees. With little discussion, it was agreed
that GP donor states will also be invited to send proposed
NGO participants.
¶3. (SBU) Elbling turned to the major item for consideration,
the review/assessment report of the GP's first five years.
To encourage a structured discussion, he requested responses
to a previously circulated German-produced questionnaire and
a French-produced matrix evaluation scheme. French Delegate
Camille Grand suggested the matrix might be useful as a
quantitative tool for assessing the progress of GP projects.
Before discussion could begin, Russian Delegate Anatoly
Antonov said Russia would not permit any GP document to refer
to Russia "as a proliferation threat." Antonov reiterated
the statement several times and mentioned dissatisfaction
with the status of the CWD projects in Russia. He claimed
contributors to the CWD projects are lagging in their
allocation of funds and added Russia could not support the
German-produced questionnaire. Nevertheless, Antonov
insisted Russia wanted to improve cooperation with members on
CWD.
¶4. (SBU) The British, Canadian, French, EU Commission, and
Italian delegates, along with Deputy Assistant Secretary
Semmel, all acknowledged Russia's concerns about the slow
pace of some projects' funding, but reaffirmed their
continued commitment to all projects under way. The
delegates agreed the review/assessment was the basis for
moving the GP forward during the next five years and beyond
and said Russia would not be singled out as a "proliferation
threat." Italian Delegate Antonio Catalano pointed out that
Russia itself has voiced concerns over the CWD program,
thereby acknowledging concerns over proliferation on its
territory.
¶5. (SBU) Antonov continued, however, despite comments from
partners that emphasized the common threats faced by all
states. He claimed the U.S. has only given 10 percent of its
pledged amount for CWD. Noting the proliferation threats
around the world, including in the U.S., DAS Semmel pointed
out that pledged funds are not disbursed all at once but in
incremental amounts, typically annually, in accordance with
government budgets. He said the proper calculation is not
the percentage spent of the total pledged amount but the
percentage of funds made available by donor countries up to
that point.
¶6. (SBU) After Elbling brought the discussion back to the
review document, the delegates generally agreed the document
must be succinct and clear to leaders and the public. DAS
Semmel urged that members use the review to reflect on GPWG
assumptions. He suggested that as the review process
continues, some surprises may lie ahead and the members will
be compelled to consider what happens after the GP program
ends in 2012.
¶7. (SBU) At this point, German MFA International Energy and
Nuclear Energy Policy Office Director Thomas Meister replaced
Elbling as Chair. Meister gave a short presentation on the
status of CWD progress. Russian Delegate Antonov announced
that the process of donor countries funding CWD projects
through G-8 members, known as piggybacking, is not working.
He claimed the UK, Canada, and others are lagging far behind
in the work on their projects, and cited the need to finish
the current projects by the end of 2009. He also reiterated
an announcement made at the November 2006 meeting that Russia
plans to allocate four billion dollars, in addition to the
two billion already on record, to complete the CWD goals by
¶2012.
¶8. (SBU) The EU Commission, Italy, the UK, and Canada, and
others disputed Antonov's claims. Canadian Delegate Troy
Lulashnyk stated piggybacking is working and that Canada and
all other participants are completely committed to resolving
the current project delays. DAS Semmel noted some delays
have resulted from disagreements over estimates and took
satisfactory note of Russia's additional four billion dollar
commitment to the GP process. Antonov suggested members flag
the issue of discrepancies between Russia's figures and those
of other member states.
¶9. (SBU) Turning to RTGs, Meister noted the need for improved
cooperation on their removal. The Russian delegation gave a
status report on RTG removals and referred to a master plan
scheduled for completion March 8 that will be a guide for
funding the removals. The Russians calculated that, of the
581 remaining RTGs, about 35 will be removed annually until
all are gone. The UK delegates informed the group that the
UK has a good relationship with Rosatom, the Russian Ministry
for Atomic Energy Agency. The Canadian delegates announced
that, with U.S. cooperation, the removal of 16 RTGs will be
completed in Russia's Northern areas in 2007.
¶10. (SBU) The discussion of Russian nuclear submarine
dismantlement took place without incident. All delegates
delivered positive statements about the status of their
respective dismantlement efforts. The Canadian delegates
spoke of their plan to work with other members to dismantle
two Russian nuclear submarines per year "until there are none
left," and announced they are shifting their efforts to the
Far East. (Note: Submarine dismantlement in the Russian Far
East lags behind that in the Northern Baltic area. End
Note.) DAS Semmel drew attention to recent reports that
scrap metal from the submarines is generating funds that help
offset the costs of dismantlement.
¶11. (SBU) Canadian Delegate Ann Pollack announced a new
biosecurity project was under way at a human and animal
research facility in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, and informed
members that both the International Science and Technology
Center in Russia and the Science and Technology Center in
Ukraine are also working on five-year reviews. She said
Canada is considering sending a science center representative
to the NGO session in February. DAS Semmel added that, as
the evolution of the science centers is being considered,
they are, in some ways, going through an assessment similar
to that of the GP. Their future must also reflect the new
global realities in which the Russian economy has improved
since 2001 and can pay for the work of nuclear scientists
without so much outside support. Russian Delegate Valery
Biryukov informed the group Russia enjoys good cooperation
with the UK on working with former weapons scientists.
Biryukov expressed satisfaction with the current "Nuclear
Cities" project and announced that Rosatom is ready to sign a
new agreement.
¶12. (SBU) Meister closed with an announcement that all
members will soon receive information on the procedures for
the next steps in the review process and options to be
considered for presenting the review at the G-8 Summit. One
option is to replace the GP annual report with the review.
The other is to cite the review in the report and disseminate
the report as a stand-alone document.
¶13. (SBU) Canada followed with an announcement it will host a
reception at its Embassy the evening of February after the
NGO presentations. At that event, the Canadian Delegation
will present materials to show the positive results of GP
cooperation over the past five years.
¶14. (SBU) Comment: The GPWG partners are looking for ways to
bring some G-8 Summit attention to GP's successes to date, to
use the process to underscore the need to expand GP
priorities, and to re-energize the GP as a tool for reducing
the global threat of WMD. Over lunch, the Germans confirmed
our view that Russia,s primary, perhaps only, concern is
that the results of the review process might cause members to
stray away from CWD and submarine dismantlement commitments
toward new "priorities." The NGO session on February 27 will
be an important event in the GP process this year. It
appears our German hosts are carefully structuring the NGO
presentations in order to stimulate the review process and
perhaps defuse or reduce political differences among the
members over what the review should say. End Comment.
¶15. (U) Heads of Delegations:
--Viktor Elbling, Germany
--Anatoly Antonov, Russian Federation
--Camille Grand, France
--Antonio Catalano di Mellili, Italy
--Atsushi Kato, Japan
--Berenice Gare, United Kingdom
--Andrew Semmel, United States
--Troy Lulashnyk, Canada
--Lars-Erik Lundin, European Commission
--Tomas Reyes Ortega, EU Council
¶16. (U) DAS Semmel has cleared this cable.
TIMKEN JR