

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE365, AMCHAM'S DISCONTENT: OECD BLACKLISTS COSTA RICA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE365.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE365 | 2009-04-30 22:10 | 2011-03-21 16:30 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0002
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0365/01 1202210
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 302210Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0804
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RAYWEED/AUSTOECD PARIS OECD
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000365
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EEB/IFD/OIA:GHICKS
DEPT FOR WHA/CEN AND WHA/EPSC:AWONG
TREASURY FOR SSENICH
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN ECON PGOV PREL CS
SUBJECT: AMCHAM'S DISCONTENT: OECD BLACKLISTS COSTA RICA
¶1. (U) SUMMARY: Representatives of the American Chamber of Commerce
(AmCham) met with DCM and Emboffs on April 17 to make a strong case
against the recent OECD listing of Costa Rica on the tax haven
"blacklist". They argued that the OECD's decision, which seemed to
ignore the transparency of the 1991 Costa Rican-U.S. Tax Exchange
Information Agreement (TEIA), was totally inappropriate:
substantively incorrect, procedurally mishandled, and politically
motivated. In addition, AmCham expressed dismay at how quickly
Finance Minister Guillermo Zuniga acceded to the OECD listing by
submitting a letter pledging that the GOCR would consider new
legislation eliminating the need for a court order in order to open
bank account records (a prominent OECD complaint). Ostensibly,
Zuniga's action changed Costa Rica's OECD classification from the
"black list" to the "grey list." AmCham -- deeply concerned about
Costa Rica's reputation after the initial OECD announcement --
requested that the USG make a statement on Costa Rica's behalf.
Post countered that Zuniga could raise the issue (at his discretion)
in his meeting with Treasury officials on April 27 (on the margins
of the World Bank meeting in Washington). Of note, the GOCR has not
approached us about the "black list." See Action Request, para 11.
END SUMMARY.
-------------------------
AN EXPERIENCED DELEGATION
-------------------------
¶2. (U) Executive Director Lynda Solar, President Luis Gamboa, and
ex-presidents Humberto Pacheco and Hernan Pacheco represented
AmCham. Given that Humberto Pacheco negotiated the GOCR's TIEA in
the 80's, he led AmCham's presentation. Pacheco seemed personally
offended by the OECD's failure to acknowledge the effectiveness of
the existing TIEA with the US (in effect since 1991) and emphasized
the difficult five-year process of gaining legislative approval for
the TIEA.
¶3. (U) The AmCham representatives' believed the OECD decision was
based on the following factors (which also figured prominently in
local media reporting about the black listing):
-- Costa Rica does not tax overseas income; and
-- Costa Rica requires a court order to be obtained in order to open
any bank account records.
---------------------------
A DELEGATION WITH A MISSION
---------------------------
¶4. (U) AmCham adamantly disagreed with Costa Rica's classification
as a tax haven by the OECD and pressed that there are "no
technically valid reasons" to place Costa Rica on any tax haven
black list for three reasons:
-- Humberto Pacheco noted that a characteristic of a tax haven is
low taxes. Quite the contrary, Costa Rica has a high tax regime;
-- Typical tax havens do not disclose tax information to the proper
foreign counterparts. Pacheco claimed that Costa Rica consistently
cooperated with U.S. counterparts, abided by the TIEA with the US,
and exercised considerable control over its banking system through a
regulator. (NOTE: Pacheco was unaware of any European disclosure
requests. END NOTE.) He stated that, to his knowledge, never in
the history of the TIEA with the United States had a request for
information been denied. That is, judicial permission to access
account information requested by the IRS has always been
forthcoming; and
-- Costa Rica purposely designed its foreign tax regime to eliminate
any appearance of "ring fencing," the issue of treating foreign
source income differently, based on the residency of the taxpayer.
The GOCR made a conscious decision to exempt taxation of all foreign
source income for all taxpayers; thus, the law treats all taxpayers
the same on this issue, which, in Pacheco's words, "is a choice that
the government made. . . very wisely."
¶5. (SBU) In addition to the specific arguments on tax havens,
AmCham cited Costa Rica's role as a good neighbor in the war against
drugs and its fight against money laundering (it passed an
anti-money laundering law earlier this year). AmCham further argued
on the issue of the OECD's "Eurocentric" outlook. AmCham contended
that the four countries on the OECD's black list -- Costa Rica,
Uruguay, Malaysia, and Philippines -- had no ties to Europe. Thus,
the OCED selected easy targets -- countries without direct European
ties -- while overlooking European counties with questionable
practices on bank secrecy, i.e. Belgium, Switzerland, and/or
Luxembourg.
¶6. (SBU) AmCham disapproved of the "easy way out of this," as
proposed by Finance Minister Zuniga, of simply proposing changes in
the law regulating bank secrecy. Hernan Pacheco stated that AmCham
strongly opposed eliminating the requirement that a judge review any
request to open bank account records. Real or perceived abuses of
the power to open bank records, Pacheco added, could do enormous
harm to Costa Rica's democracy by altering Costa Ricans' perceptions
of (and confidence in) government. Furthermore, it isn't clear how
the government would truly guarantee the protection of privacy
rights (without the requirement for a judicial order).
---------------
SAY IT ISN'T SO
---------------
¶7. (SBU) Humberto Pacheco argued that "the US should not have
allowed [Angel] Guria [OECD Secretary General] to denigrate Costa
Rica's reputation, since there is not a technical reason [for Costa
Rica's presence on a black list]". Pacheco noted that the term "tax
haven black list" still lingers in the air, in spite of the OECD
elevating Costa Rica to the "grey list" five days after the "black
list" announcement. Pacheco, the ex-TIEA negotiator, continued,
"We're looking for a face-saving comment from the USG that helps
clear Costa Rica's reputation." "Whatever the inner workings of
this situation," Pacheco continued, "it was made to look like the
G20 originated this." He suggested the following points: "Costa
Rica has a TIEA with the US, has cooperated with the United States,
and has never denied access to requested bank information."
¶8. (SBU) We listened to the presentation and noted that GOCR's
delinquency on many issues, such as passing the anti-money
laundering law, could have played a part in the OECD decision.
Also, the DCM shared some of the findings provided informally to us
by Treasury (TREAS) prior to the AmCham meeting: (1) TREAS is not
comfortable with the OECD list-making, (2) nonetheless, TREAS
generally agreed with OECD's underlying goals, and (3) the US
Internal Revenue Service is reasonably comfortable with Costa Rica's
cooperation through the framework of the TIEA. However, we were
noncommittal about any USG statement in defense of Costa Rica, urged
AmCham to voice their concerns directly to the GOCR, and suggested
that Zuniga raise the issue at his meeting with Treasury on the
margins of the IMF/World Bank meeting April 27. We also said we
would report AmCham's concerns to Washington.
¶9. (SBU) In one notable follow-up, Finance Vice Minister Jenny
Phillips has invited Jeffrey Owens of the OECD's Center for Tax
Policy and Administration to Costa Rica for a review session of the
proposed legislation. The Ministry is girding itself for the
session by publicly noting that several other Latin American
countries also have bank secrecy laws, while stressing the GOCR's
cooperation on information requests.
--------------------------
COMMENT AND ACTION REQUEST
--------------------------
¶10. (SBU) The GOCR evidently does not share AmCham's concerns and
has not approached us. (In fact, we understand that Zuniga did not
discuss the issue during his meetings in Washington). We respect
AmCham's enthusiasm for (and expertise on) this issue, but believe
that the GOCR decided to quickly dispense with the issue by
promising to introduce legislation that would eliminate the need for
a court order to open bank account records. We doubt such
legislation could be passed quickly or easily (if at all) in Costa
Rica, but the pledge alone seemed to have satisfied the OECD.
Though an OECD designation can sully the reputation of a designee,
we understand that a designation carries no penalties or sanctions.
¶11. (SBU) ACTION REQUEST: In the aftermath of the controversy (which
we expect may re-surface here given the pending OECD review session,
we remain interested in others' views of the transparency and
fairness of the OECD ranking process. We would appreciate insight
from the Department, USEU, and/or Treasury. We cannot judge from
here, but AmCham makes a persuasive case against OECD's objectivity.
Why, for example, did the OECD rating seem to discount the
importance of a functioning TIEA between the GOCR and the USG?
CIANCHETTE