

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON69, TAXES, LAW AND ORDER TOP KEY'S LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON69.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON69 | 2009-03-10 02:26 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO4651
RR RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0069/01 0690226
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 100226Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5790
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1931
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5470
RUEHAP/AMEMBASSY APIA 0547
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0810
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000069
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV KCRM KDEM NZ
SUBJECT: TAXES, LAW AND ORDER TOP KEY'S LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
WELLINGTON 00000069 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) Summary. Prime Minister John Key was quick to enact his
initial legislative agenda after coming to power following the 2008
election. As Key had promised prior to the election, his Government
swiftly passed a tax cut package and a series of stronger law and
order measures. The National-led Government also moved rapidly to
unwind aspects of the previous Labour administration's more
unpopular legislative legacy. Key has been bound by agreements with
minor support parties to introduce or address some contentious
legislation, such as the proposed "three strikes" bill and review of
the Foreshore and Seabed Act. With its clear parliamentary
majority, the Government's legislative program in its first 100 days
progressed comfortably through Parliament. His legislative program
over the medium term is unlikely to yield any surprises. End
Summary.
First Up: Tax Relief
--------------------
¶2. (SBU) Prime Minister John Key's top legislative objective was to
quickly pass into law a tax relief package before the Christmas
recess, in keeping with a promise made during the election
campaign. The tax cut legislation, which also included changes to
the KiwiSaver pension scheme, was comfortably passed on December 11.
The legislation stipulates that the first round of cuts will come
into effect on April 1 2009, with subsequent rounds in 2010 and
¶2011. Despite calls from the opposition Labour Party to suspend the
2009 round on the grounds that the country cannot afford tax cuts in
the current economic climate, Key remains committed to his promise.
Key, however, is unwilling to give a categorical assurance that tax
cuts promised for 2010 and 2011 will go ahead. (Note: If the
Government wishes to defer or abolish future tax cuts it will have
to change its own legislation. End Note).
Early Focus on Law and Order Legislation
----------------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) Strengthened law and order measures have featured
prominently in the Government's first 100 days legislative program.
Key's pre-election position on introducing tougher law and order
measures proved extremely popular with voters anxious about the
rising crime rate under Labour. The Government quickly introduced
legislation to remove the right of the worst repeat violent
offenders to be released on parole. It toughened the bail laws to
make it harder for criminals awaiting trial to get bail. The
Government also moved quickly to bring in legislation to require DNA
testing for every person arrested for an imprisonable offence.
Current Draft of Three Strikes Bill Faces Hurdles
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶4. (SBU) Under its obligation in the supply and confidence
agreement with the hard-right ACT Party, the Government introduced
the controversial Sentencing and Parole Reform Bill. The proposed
legislation, a key ACT Party policy, is a "three strikes and you're
out" measure. It would see those convicted of a third serious
offence sentenced to life imprisonment with a 25-year non-parole
period. National has reserved judgment on whether it will support
the legislation further. Evidence is mounting that the Bill may not
proceed as drafted. Chris Finlayson, in his capacity as
Attorney-General, has found the three-strikes bill has an "apparent
inconsistency" with the section of New Zealand's Bill of Rights
protecting New Zealanders against cruel, degrading or
"disproportionately severe" punishment. Additionally, the Maori
Party, another Government support partner, has come out against the
bill in the belief that the legislation would lead to
disproportionate sentencing. The Maori Party also believes that the
Bill may have a particularly destructive effect on Maori families,
many of whom face a greater chance of having a family member
imprisoned because of the higher rate of Maori criminal recidivism.
¶5. (SBU) In its March 6 editorial, The New Zealand Herald called
the three-strikes policy flawed as a means of lowering the crime
rate and called for the legislation's rejection by a parliamentary
select committee. The newspaper urged the Government to fine-tune
its law and order policy to find "the right balance between
punishing criminals, safeguarding society from those who present too
great a risk and providing rehabilitation carrots."
Three Strikes Bill Generates Prison Funding Debate
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶6. (SBU) The cost of implementing the three strikes legislation has
also become a source of debate. Although the Government has not
released any figures surrounding the cost of implementing the
WELLINGTON 00000069 002.2 OF 003
legislation, the advocacy group Rethinking Crime and Punishment Now
estimated the cost of implementation (based on its the prediction
that new prisons will have to be subsequently constructed to house
greater inmate numbers) at around NZD 7.5 billion over 25 years, and
an ongoing extra operational cost at NZD 1 billion a year. Key,
however, disputed these figures. He argued that the Bill will not
necessarily effect a increase in near term prison numbers, as the
law change would not be retrospective and by the time an offender
was going to jail for a serious offence for a third time they would
already be getting a long sentence. Said Key, "(offenders) can't
just get put away for stealing chewing gum, they have to have a
conviction for a serious offence." The Government is, however,
presently considering allowing private-sector operational management
of some New Zealand prisons.
GNZ to Review Controversial Foreshore Law
----------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) As part of National's confidence and supply agreement with
the Maori Party, Key will establish a three-person panel to complete
a ministerial review of the controversial Foreshore and Seabed Act
by July 2009. For the Maori Party, the Foreshore and Seabed Act is
critical. The Act was passed by the Labour Government in 2004 and
confirmed Crown ownership of New Zealand's foreshore and seabed in
perpetuity. As a result, tens of thousands of Maori marched on
parliament in protest against the law which was viewed by many as a
"land grab," taking away private land and customary rights from
Maori. Then-Labour MP Tariana Turia left the party in protest at
the legislation and formed the Maori Party. The Maori Party will
not be satisfied unless the Foreshore and Seabed Act is repealed.
Even before coming power, Key recognized the Maori Party's concerns
over the Act and had promised to undertake a review of law. The
National Party, however, remains committed to its position that it
would only agree to the Act's repeal if there were appropriate
protection in place to ensure all New Zealanders enjoy access to the
foreshore and seabed, either through existing and potentially new
legislation.
Unwinding Controversial Labour Legislation
------------------------------------------
¶8. (SBU) The Key administration has moved quickly to address some
controversial laws enacted or strengthened under the previous Labour
government. National swiftly repealed the highly controversial
Electoral Finance Act (EFA) passed in 2007 to establish strict laws
governing financial contributions to politics. The EFA prompted the
most acrimonious debate in modern New Zealand politics with
then-Labour Prime Minister Helen Clark accused of advancing the
legislation for her party's own narrow political purposes.
Paradoxically, Clark's successor as Labour Party leader and early
backer of the EFA, Phil Goff, expressed regret for the law's
enactment and ordered his MPs to vote for its repeal. Out of the
122 MPs, only the nine Green Party members voted against the repeal.
¶9. (SBU) National also moved promptly to address an existing law
which was controversially strengthened under the Clark
administration, the Resource Management Act (RMA). The RMA was
introduced in 1991 to oversee building and development projects from
those of national significance down to local council plans and small
scale building on individual properties. Under Clark, the law was
extended to increase regulation which, inadvertently, invited a rash
of frivolous objections to developments. Prior to the election, Key
had called the RMA a "handbrake on growth." He quickly introduced
legislation to reform the RMA to create greater certainty around
developments and stalled projects, and to "unlock that lost growth
potential and untangle the red tape suffocating everyone from
homeowners to business." Part of the newly proposed legislation to
reform the RMA involves the establishment of a new Environmental
Protection Authority to expedite consents for major building and
infrastructure projects.
Comment
-------
¶10. (SBU) The Key administration's legislative agenda in its first
100 days progressed through parliament with little disruption. This
was largely due to its clear voting majority provided by National's
support parties and popular public support for the proposed
legislation, all of which was well-telegraphed in advance. However,
having exhausted his campaign legislative promises Key has not
clearly stated what his legislative program will look like in the
near term. Differences over the three-strikes legislation will test
the National's relationship with ACT and the Maori Party, but it
will not derail the Government's hard-hitting law and order program.
WELLINGTON 00000069 003.2 OF 003
Additionally, the Foreshore and Seabed Act review may further test
the National-Maori Party relationship, but not likely to the extent
of causing it significant harm. Key has proved to be a pragmatic
consensus-builder and looks fully capable of weathering encroaching
legislative storms. End Comment.
Keegan