

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 03OTTAWA723, DISTANT NEIGHBORS, NORTHERN STYLE: CANADIAN
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03OTTAWA723.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
03OTTAWA723 | 2003-03-14 21:45 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000723
SIPDIS
HOMELAND SECURITY FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KPAO KPLS CA
SUBJECT: DISTANT NEIGHBORS, NORTHERN STYLE: CANADIAN
OPINION OF THE U.S.
¶1. Summary and Conclusion. International debate on the war
on terrorism and impending war in Iraq has raised serious
concern about "What the World Thinks" about the United
States and its foreign policies. This is as true for Canada
as for the rest of the world. Canada is our largest trading
partner; shares our longest land border; and has been a
close ally in two world wars, the Cold War and in the war on
terrorism. Implementation of new security measures post 9-
11, such as NSEERS and visa requirements for Commonwealth
Landed Immigrants in Canada, as well as perennial bilateral
trade issues, have given us additional reason to ask how
Canadians perceive us.
¶2. This is the first in a series of cables that attempts to
assess Canadian opinion of the U.S. and public support in
Canada for U.S. policies. This report reviews the findings
of three recent, publicly released Canadian public opinion
polls. These polls indicate that we still enjoy a reservoir
of good will with most Canadians. But the polls also
indicate that the international environment post 9-11 has
drawn heavily on that good will. The U.S. has a broad and
complex policy agenda in which Canadian opinion matters.
The opinion polling results suggest that, as we implement
our policy agenda, we will need to find ways effectively to
shore up public support from our nearest neighbors. End
Summary and Conclusion.
IRAQ: CANADIAN VIEWS ARE MIXED BUT GENERALLY SUPPORT
MILITARY ACTION ONLY IF SANCTIONED BY THE UN.
¶3. The most recent publicly released national poll was
conducted by the firm Ipsos-Reid on February 28 2003. It
finds a slim majority (51 percent) of Canadians saying that
the UN Security Council has enough evidence to authorize
military action against Iraq. This is a small but
significant shift from a poll conducted 10 days earlier in
which 52 percent of Canadians said that there was not enough
evidence to authorize an attack.
¶4. This does not mean that a majority of Canadians support
the U.S. position on Iraq. 62 per cent of Canadians in the
Feb 28 survey continue to believe that Canada should support
more time for UN inspectors in Iraq to complete their
mission. 62 percent of Canadians also say that Canada
should provide assistance for military action in Iraq only
if the UN decides military action is required.
¶5. Only 32 percent of Canadians feel Canada should support
U.S. and U.K. calls for immediate military action to remove
Saddam Hussein from power. Even fewer - 18 percent - say
that Canada should provide military assistance if the U.S.
decides that military action is required in Iraq without UN
authorization. Another 18 percent of Canadians feel that
Canada should provide no military assistance for any action
in Iraq, even if authorized by the UN.
REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN CANADIAN PERCEPTIONS
¶6. Canada's regions exhibit differing patterns of support
for the U.S. position on Iraq. The view that the UN
Security Council now has enough evidence to authorize
military action against Iraq is shared by at least half of
the residents in each region except in Quebec, where only 34
percent of Canadians hold this view. When Quebec is removed
from the national polling, agreement among Canadians rises
to 57 percent.
¶7. Of all Canadians, Albertans exhibit the highest level of
support; 70 percent believe the UN has sufficient evidence
to authorize military action. Other western Canadians,
however, are more strongly opposed. In Saskatchewan and
Manitoba, 67 percent (up from 53 percent in the earlier
poll) now say that Canada should support more time for UN
inspectors. Only 28 percent (down from 42 percent in the
earlier poll) say that Canada should support the U.S./U.K.
position on the need for military action in Iraq.
A BASELINE OF CANADIAN OPINION OF THE U.S. - THE PEW CENTER
STUDY.
¶8. The Pew Center Study, published at the end of 2002, has
been widely discussed in U.S. and foreign media, including
the media in Canada. The study received relatively little
attention on a country-by-country basis, however. The
Study, conducted in July 2002, shows that Canadians hold
positive attitudes about the U.S. At 72 percent favorable,
Canadians held a more positive image of the U.S. than almost
any other country (among traditional allies, only the U.K.
was more positive at 75 percent). That rating by Canadians
was up one percentage point, from 71 percent, in the
previous year's survey.
¶9. The Pew Center Study also indicates that Canadians and
Americans are alike in many of their national perceptions.
They express remarkably similar satisfaction with their own
lives. 67 percent of Canadians and 64 per cent of Americans
are satisfied with their personal lives, far higher levels
of satisfaction than in other industrialized western
nations. Canadians and Americans also express similar views
of "progress" in their countries over the past five years
(51 percent among Americans, 48 percent among Canadians).
And they express similar levels of "optimism" about the
future (61 per cent among Americans and 54 per cent among
Canadians). Americans and Canadians are significantly more
optimistic about the future than are western Europeans.
¶10. Yet there are significant differences in American and
Canadian perceptions of specific issue areas on the world
scene. 50 percent of Americans identify terrorism as a
"very big" problem; only 19 percent of Canadians expressed
that concern. The Pew Study found a duality of opinion
among the U.S.' closest allies in their support for the war
against terrorism. Canadian opinion fits that pattern: 68
per cent of Canadians supported the U.S. led war on
terrorism; but only 25 percent of Canadians believed that
U.S. foreign policy "considers others" when making
international policy decisions, including decisions about
countering international terrorism.
¶11. Canadians are critical of the U.S. in the economic
sphere. 68 percent of Canadians believe that the U.S. does
"too little to solve problems related to the gap between
rich and poor countries." On issues of pollution and the
environment, nearly twice as many Canadians as Americans are
"worried" (44 per cent vs. 23 per cent). While 50 percent
of Canadians like "American ideas about democracy," 56
percent of Canadians dislike "American ideas about business
practices."
¶12. Canadians have mixed views of U.S. cultural influence
but they are far less critical than Europeans. 54 per cent
of Canadians expressed the sentiment that the "spread of
American ideas and customs" was bad. This compares with 71
percent in France, 67 percent in Germany and 68 percent in
Russia. Yet 77 percent of Canadians "like" American popular
culture. This compares with 66 percent in France and
Germany and only 42 percent in Russia.
¶13. Among western countries, only in Canada does a strong
majority (77 per cent) express a positive view of
immigration. Among other major industrial countries,
Americans show the next highest level of support for
immigration; but at 49 percent, American support for
immigration is far lower than Canadian.
CANADIAN OPINION UPDATE: A NEGATIVE SHIFT?
¶14. The Pew Center in Canada was conducted by the Environics
Research Group in July, 2002. The same firm conducted a
separate poll with a different set of respondents in
February 2003. The two polls were not designed to be
strictly inter-comparable. Nevertheless, the findings of
the later poll may suggest a negative shift in Canadian
perceptions of the U.S. The overall Canadian attitude
toward the U.S. remained favorable. But at 62 percent, it
was considerably lower than in August 2002.
A majority of Quebecers - 54 per cent - for the first time
held an unfavorable opinion of the U.S., a 20 percent drop
since August 2002.
¶15. The polling data from Quebec suggests that, despite the
decline of separatism as a political issue, there is still a
significant anglophone/francophone division of opinion on
international issues. This is particularly interesting as
Quebecers often have been viewed as more pro-American than
other Canadians - particularly in Ontario - because of wide
support for free trade and American culture. In another
twist, the latest poll finds Canadians overall holding more
positive views of both the U.K. and France than of the U.S.
77 percent of Canadians hold a favorable view of the U.K.
compared to 69 percent for France and 62 percent for the
U.S. The favorable rating for France in Quebec was 80
percent compared with 62 percent for the U.K. and 40 percent
for the U.S.
¶16. COMMENT. These polling results indicate that Canadian
perceptions of the U.S. are mixed and dynamic, and that they
exhibit significant regional differences. Future cables
will attempt to assess more anecdotally the extent to which
Canadian perceptions may reflect deeper sentiments in favor
of peace and in favor of multi-lateral action; and the
extent to which such sentiments may translate into "anti-
American" feelings. END COMMENT. Cellucci