

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05PARIS2333, GWOT ASSESSMENT: EMBASSY PARIS FEEDBACK
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05PARIS2333.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05PARIS2333 | 2005-04-07 13:21 | 2010-11-30 16:30 | SECRET | Embassy Paris |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 PARIS 002333
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EUR/PGI (BUCKNEBERG) AND S/CT
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/06/2014
TAGS: PTER PREL FR
SUBJECT: GWOT ASSESSMENT: EMBASSY PARIS FEEDBACK
REF: A. STATE 60796
¶B. 04 PARIS 8983
¶C. PARIS 280
Classified By: DEPUTY CHIEF OF MISSION ALEX WOLFF, FOR REASONS 1.4 B/D
¶1. (S) Summary: U.S.-French cooperation on terrorism is
mature and broad-based. For a number of reasons, including
the memory of terrorist attacks in Paris during the 1980s,
the French bring significant expertise, focus and
determination to their C/T activities, and are valued
partners for a wide range of USG agencies. C/T cooperation
with the USG is largely insulated from the day-to-day
political and diplomatic tussles that can make the French
often difficult allies. Notwithstanding this solid
foundation, Post has outlined three areas where we believe
our C/T objectives can be better served, and proposes
suggestions to implement these objectives. End summary.
---------------------------------
A MATURE, SUCCESSFUL RELATIONSHIP
---------------------------------
¶2. (S/NF) Embassy Paris comprises one of the widest range of
USG agency representation anywhere in the world. Many of
these agencies play a role in the remarkably broad
U.S.-France security and counter-terrorism relationship. In
addition to State's Consular, Diplomatic Security, Economic,
Political, and Public Diplomacy sections that each handle
pieces of the terrorism portfolio, other non-State sections
in Paris that deal with the French on terrorism issues
include the DEA, the Defense Attache, a DOJ liaison
prosecutor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) located
in Paris and in the port cities of Le Havre and Marseilles,
Legatt/FBI, NCIS, OSI, ROAL, a Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) representative, and the Secret Service.
A significant portion of the work of the Embassy's EST office
is now counterterrorism-related. Other non-traditional
security-oriented offices also contribute to counterterrorism
work. For example, the Foreign Agricultural Service Office
liaises with French agriculture authorities on biosafety
risks. In addition, USG personnel are assigned to Interpol
headquarters in Lyon, France's second largest city.
¶3. (S) Two reasons for this breadth of USG representation are
1) France's own outsized role internationally and within the
EU on counter-terrorism issues; and 2) a long-term
institutional desire by the GOF to maintain close relations
with USG C/T professionals. In addition to this permanent
USG presence, delegations from the United States often visit
France to discuss specialized aspects of C/T. Two noteworthy
recent examples were a DOE/NRC/NSC/STATE visit in January on
the protection of nuclear facilities and radiological
materials. The visit has led to the development of the a
multi-year program to share best practices, swap observers at
nuclear security exercises, and collaborate scientifically to
improve passive security measures for nuclear facilities.
Also, in December 2004, then-Secretary of Health and Human
Services Tommy Thompson led an HHS/STATE delegation to a G-8
meeting hosted in France to engage at a deeper level on the
threat of bioterrorism. The ongoing work of the Bioterrorism
Experts Group includes such items as best practices in
protection of the food supply; information sharing on
zoonotic diseases; licensing issues on medical
countermeasures; sharing of information regarding vaccine
availability; and the sharing of national response plans.
France hosted two bioterrorism conferences in April in Lyon:
the first Interpol conference devoted to this subject and a
WHO-sponsored meeting on Biosafety and Biorisks. France
participates actively in these fora and sends experts to
U.S.-hosted biosafety/biorisk seminars in the U.S.
¶4. (S) Internationally, France is a long-standing contributor
of military troops and assistance in Afghanistan and a French
admiral is regularly in the rotation to command Task Force
150, a multinational naval force that patrols the Red Sea and
the Persian Gulf to interdict the movement of suspected
terrorists from Afghanistan to the Arabian Peninsula. French
Special Forces also operate closely with coalition forces in
Afghanistan. It is a key member of the UN's
Counter-Terrorism Committee and the G-8's Counter-Terrorism
Action Group, and it has supported (and co-sponsored, where
possible) terrorist designations to the UN's 1267 sanctions
committee. Bilaterally, France recently signed two updated
agreements on extradition and counter-terrorism cooperation,
and cooperates closely on Container Security Initiative (CSI)
and airline security issues. Domestically, France continues
to hold in pretrial detention 6 of the 7 ex-GTMO French
citizen detainees (the seventh was declared not an enemy
combatant by the Department of Defense). All six will be
charged with "terrorist conspiracy," which has a maximum
sentence of ten years. Most recently, terrorism
investigating judges and prosecutors successfully argued for
the conviction of Djamel Beghal and five accomplices arrested
in 2001 on suspicion of planning to bomb the U.S. Embassy in
Paris. Beghal and his five accomplices were convicted on
March 15 and all received jail sentences. Other significant
C/T operations include the dismantling of a local cell of
"French jihadists to Iraq," a raid on and continuing
investigation of the MEK presence in France, the dismantling
of a GICM cell, and the near-destruction of ETA support cells
in the south of France. Additional examples are reviewed in
ref B.
----------------
AREAS TO IMPROVE
----------------
¶5. (S) As noted in ref C, France often appears to react
differently to terrorism and radical Islam depending on its
distance from it. Within its borders, the GOF reacts
proactively, with speed and firmness. Elsewhere in the
world, it is much more equivocal. Political and diplomatic
considerations carry substantial weight, and sometimes trump
security considerations. A good example of this is continued
French intransigence within the EU on Hezbollah. It sees the
EU's listing of Hezbollah as a bad idea for Lebanon's
political stability and therefore, it continues to hold a
firm line against listing, despite a growing openness within
internal security circles to acknowledge that Hezbollah has
committed terrorist acts and should be considered a terrorist
organization. An approach that combines convincing the GOF
of a case's merits and, where necessary, isolating France
diplomatically offers the best chance of success, although in
this particular situation, it will prove difficult to
overcome the firm conviction of President Chirac and others
that designating Hezbollah is a bad idea. Nevertheless,
France's intelligence and security services must be persuaded
by the existing evidence that Hezbollah is a terrorist
organization. Presenting the GOF with evidence of Hezbollah
involvement in terrorism in the West Bank and Gaza is
particularly important, as the GOF cannot overlook
Hezbollah's efforts to destroy the Israeli-Palestinian peace
process. Having the Palestinian leadership weigh in with the
French at a high level would be important as well; up to now,
the French have maintained that only the U.S. and Israel are
pressing them on Hezbollah, while the Palestinians remain in
the background on the issue. Second, France must be isolated
within the EU Clearinghouse. A number of EU countries hide
behind France's strong opposition, but if they are peeled
away, France may be more amenable. In general, France does
not like to be seen publicly as blocking consensus, a fact
that worked to our advantage in finally convincing the EU to
designate Hamas.
¶6. (S) The Embassy believes that a gap in French C/T planning
is its development of mass-casualty emergency response. The
GOF understands they have improvements to make and have begun
to conduct exercises to build and test their emergency
response capabilities. However, France could benefit from
observing the USG crisis simulation exercises. Post would
recommend, therefore, for the invitation (where possible) for
a GOF official to observe USG exercises and simulations. One
good recent example is the inclusion of two high-level French
officials as observers to the TOPOFF 3 simulation in the U.S.
Expanding on this worthy initiative, Washington might
consider inviting French officials as observers to other,
similar simulations in the U.S. and abroad, to include USG
training programs with other countries (such as those
referenced in Jakarta 4212). The French can be prickly if
given the impression that they need to be "trained" and in
addition, giving them decision-making roles is often best
avoided. One way to overcome these issues is to focus on
"professional exchanges" and invite them to observe
USG-organized emergency response simulations and allow them
to translate best practices to the French system. In
addition, Post will work to procure invitations for the USG
to observe French-led crisis simulations.
¶7. (S) As mentioned in para 1, U.S.-French C/T cooperation is
largely removed from daily political and diplomatic
pressures. One reason for this is that GOF counter-terrorism
is itself separated from the rest of the government.
France's intelligence-related agencies and coordinating
bodies - of which the DST, the RG, the DGSE and the SGDN are
primary examples - all deal with terrorism (although the DST
has a primary role domestically), but their investigations
and cases are guarded carefully and rarely shared with the
rest of the GOF. Similarly, the renowned terrorism
investigating judges - led by Judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere -
operate in a different world than that of the rest of the
judiciary. In short, the GOF counter-terrorism community is
highly professional, but insular and centralized in Paris.
Because of this, judiciary and police services not directly
involved in counter-terrorism (but who may play an indirect
support role) have a largely insufficient understanding of
USG counter-terrorism policy and the judicial/investigative
procedures that frame this policy. To replace working-level
and upper management, France's counter-terrorism community
draws upon the available pool of judicial and security
professionals, many of whom have little understanding of the
U.S., its judicial/law enforcement system, and its law
enforcement organizational structure and resource
allocations. We need to reach these judicial and security
professionals as they begin their careers, and not only when
they enter the counter-terrorism community, sometimes with
already-formed prejudices. To this end, Post proposes
approaching the National Magistrate School, other
professional academies, and programs for already serving law
enforcement officials with offers to deliver lectures on U.S.
approaches to terrorism and law enforcement. We would
request assistance from Washington in developing these
proposals. Although in this case, results would probably not
be immediate, in the long run, the USG would have much to
gain by exposing French judicial and security professionals
to the U.S. counter-terrorism and law enforcement system at
an early stage in their careers.
LEACH