

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09BRASILIA1292, Third Meeting of the Steering Group of the U.S.-Brazil
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BRASILIA1292.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09BRASILIA1292 | 2009-11-05 13:23 | 2011-02-16 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Brasilia |
VZCZCXRO9894
RR RUEHRG
DE RUEHBR #1292/01 3091323
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 051323Z NOV 09
FM AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5322
RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO 0001
RUEHRG/AMCONSUL RECIFE 0073
RUEHSO/AMCONSUL SAO PAULO 0035
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 BRASILIA 001292
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: NA
TAGS: PHUM PREL ELAB ECON PGOV SOCI BR
SUBJECT: Third Meeting of the Steering Group of the U.S.-Brazil
Joint Action Plan to Eliminate Racial and Ethnic Discrimination and Promote Equality, October 22-23
REF: Brasilia 1167
¶1. Summary: In an October 22-23 Steering Group meeting of the U.S.-Brazil Joint Action Plan to Eliminate Racial and Ethnic Discrimination and Promote Equality, the USG and GOB agreed on the following:
-- the public launching of a $400,000 Small Grants Program for educational and cultural projects to promote racial and ethnic equality;
-- oversight responsibilities for the selection, monitoring and evaluation of such projects;
-- support for efforts to cooperate in combating racial profiling by the Brazilian police; and
-- endorsement of greater U.S. and Brazilian civil society and private sector involvement in the Joint Action Plan. The meeting for the first time saw significant participation of Brazilian civil society and the election of four Brazilian civil society co-chairs. This will allow for more direct and effective interaction with the two U.S. civil society co-chairs and U.S. organizations. A/S Shannon, leading the U.S. side, encouraged civil society and the private sector participation in the Joint Action Plan as a means to address racial inequality and increase social inclusion. End summary.
¶2. In two days of discussion October 22-23 in Salvador da Bahia, Brazil, the governments of Brazil and the United States agreed on a number of steps to advance the Joint Action Plan to Eliminate Racial and Ethnic Discrimination and Promote Equality. At this, the third meeting of the Steering Group of the Joint Action Plan since the U.S.-Brazilian agreement was signed in March 2008, the two governments announced the launching of a $400,000 Small Grants Program for educational and cultural projects to promote racial and ethnic equality. Projects can be proposed by Brazilian civil society organizations working in partnership with U.S. organizations. The governments of both countries, through Brazil's Special Secretariat for Policies to Promote Racial Equality (SEPPIR) and Ministry of External Relations (MRE) and the U.S. Department of State, will have oversight responsibilities for the selection, monitoring and evaluation of such projects.
Government Dialogues
¶3. The two governments engaged in in-depth policy dialogues on employment, education and health. Apart from SEPPIR (represented by Minister Edson Santos), MRE (represented by Under Secretary for Political Affairs Vera Machado), and the U.S. Department of State (represented by Assistant Secretary for Western Hemisphere Affairs Thomas Shannon) and U.S. Charge d'Affaires Lisa Kubiske, the following agencies participated in the dialogue: the Brazilian Ministries of Health, Justice, Labor and Employment, the U.S. Departments of Justice and Labor, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (represented by Acting Chair Stuart Ishimaru), the Inter-American Foundation (represented by President Larry Palmer), the Agency for International Development, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
¶4. Employment: A number of initiatives were considered to increase access of Afro-descendant and indigenous people to the labor market, to guarantee equal pay for equal work and to improve the precarious situation of domestic workers in Brazil, most of whom are Afro-descendant and female. The two governments agreed to follow up on a proposal to apply the lessons of the 1996 Olympic Games in Atlanta to the 2016 Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, specifically in providing incentives for black-owned enterprises and training and employment opportunities for black workers.
¶5. Education: The two governments reviewed a number of projects already completed and suggested that future projects under the Joint Action Plan focus on job-oriented education and education below the university level where the impact of investment is greatest. In addition, it was agreed that greater emphasis should be placed on English teaching to prepare young people for entry into the labor market.
¶6. Health: The focus of the policy dialogue on health was on racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence of heart disease, diabetes, HIV/AIDS, other diseases and infant mortality. Brazil's Ministry of Health and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention already collaborate extensively. The governments agreed, however, that more could be done, especially technical exchanges and assistance to eliminate the most pervasive disparities in the provision of health care.
¶7. On the margins of the Joint Action Plan meeting, officials of the Brazilian Ministry of Justice and U.S. Department of Justice, jointly with civil society representatives, outlined a project to cooperate in combating racial profiling by the Brazilian police.
BRASILIA 00001292 002 OF 003
Planning for this project is ongoing.
Civil Society Panels
¶8. Members of Brazil's civil society elected four civil society committee co-chairs and, concurrent with the government meetings, joined their two U.S. counterparts in a series of panel discussions involving civil society organizations, government officials and representatives of the private sector of both countries to explore possibilities for binational cooperation in the areas of public security, health care for the black population, preservation of black culture, access to higher education and corporate social responsibility. Civil society representation was strong and vocal, often numbering over 40 a session, and Bahian state officials and nongovernmental organizations from Bahia also contributed significantly to these discussions.
¶9. Public security: A Brazilian Ministry of Justice official described his ministry's efforts to put police in positions of mentorship for disadvantaged youth. A professor of the Federal University of Bahia, however, claimed that the police were responsible for brutalizing black youth. U.S. participants from the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) and the Denver Police Department explained their work, respectively, to measure racial bias by police and to train police not to discriminate based on race.
¶10. Health care for the black population: A U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention official described a federal initiative called REACH to support lifestyle changes, build health-professional capacity and monitor outcomes to improve the health status in minority communities in the United States. A representative of the National Health Policy for the Black Population of Brazil outlined efforts to reduce racially-based health disparities, including a program started in 1996 to create a database of children with sickle-cell anemia in 15 states. A UCLA researcher described her studies on the health effects of racial discrimination and the role of the affected community in determining public health priorities.
¶11. Preservation of black culture: An American professor linked memory and self-preservation, noting the impact and legacy of the African holocaust and how the U.S. civil rights movement helped to build a black identity based on pride and self-respect. A Brazilian museum curator spoke about the need to teach Afro-descendant youth the history of their people, and she said museums played a vital role in that task. During the discussion period, some audience members advocated establishment of a memorial to slavery with an emphasis on resistance and rebellion. There was also wide support for a festival of Afro-origin culture between Brazil and the United States, potentially expanding to include other countries in the African diaspora.
¶12. Access to higher education: A professor from UCLA outlined the history of affirmative action in the United States, and an American student noted how in California minority representation amongst university students dropped dramatically when certain affirmative action measures were abandoned. A Brazilian educator said that admission quotas were essential in Brazil to ensure educational opportunities for Afro-descendant and indigenous peoples.
Private Sector
¶13. Corporate social responsibility: U.S., Brazilian and third-country companies detailed their efforts to reach out to the Afro-Brazilian community both as a matter of philanthropy and to provide employment opportunities. Several audience members evinced skepticism while at the same time urging companies to do more.
Lessons Learned
¶14. We gleaned a number of lessons from the Salvador meeting that can be applied toward future meetings of the Steering Group:
-- There should be a concentration on a narrower range of subjects to allow for more in-depth and interactive discussion.
-- Large group discussions must have structure and discipline. An iron-willed but neutral and amiable moderator should limit the time for opening statements by panelists and cut off speechifying and irrelevant comments from the audience.
-- Having concurrent meetings of government and civil society caused some in civil society to believe they were being cut out of the most important discussions and weakened our message of cooperation and joint action.
-- The participation of specialized USG agencies, at both the technical and policy level, provides necessary expertise. However, senior-level officials need to be better utilized, e.g., given more time to speak in the Steering Group, and be programmed for related outside activities.
BRASILIA 00001292 003 OF 003
-- High-level side meetings are critical. A/S Shannon had productive discussions with U.S. and Brazilian civil society and private sector representatives, helping to shore up support for the Joint Action Plan. -- Between Steering Group meetings, there needs to be frequent interaction involving the USG, GOB and civil society/private sector actors to ensure continuous progress in achieving Joint Action Plan goals.
Comment
¶15. The Salvador meeting heralded a new level of cooperation between Brazil and the United States in promoting racial and ethnic equality and demonstrated significant interest on the part of Brazilian civil society organizations. This cooperation is not merely government to government, but involves civil society and, increasingly, the business sector of both countries. Our intention is to bring together the whole of our societies so that people from all walks of life can learn from their counterparts in the other country and cooperate in areas of mutual interest. The justice project mentioned in paragraph 7 above has the potential to become a major initiative of the Joint Action Plan. Meeting participants from both countries had a sense of forward movement in Salvador and are looking forward with enthusiasm to the next meeting of the Steering Group in the United States in April 2010.
Kubiske