

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08WELLINGTON370, NZ'S ELECTION UNDER THE CONTROVERSIAL MMP
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08WELLINGTON370.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08WELLINGTON370 | 2008-11-03 06:13 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO1303
RR RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0370/01 3080613
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 030613Z NOV 08
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5509
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1774
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5302
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0741
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 WELLINGTON 000370
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KDEM NZ
SUBJECT: NZ'S ELECTION UNDER THE CONTROVERSIAL MMP
SYSTEM
WELLINGTON 00000370 001.2 OF 004
¶1. (SBU) Summary. On November 8, New Zealand goes to
the polls under the Mixed Member Proportional (MMP)
parliamentary system. Though initially popular when
introduced in 1996, the country is now divided over
MMP's merits. If National forms the next government,
it has promised to review MMP. Labour and the smaller
parties, all of which have benefited from MMP, have
expressed little desire to review the system. In order
to form a government, both Labour and National are
unlikely to get a popular majority of Parliamentary
seats and therefore will need the support of one or
more smaller parties, a situation which can give a
minor party a disproportionate voice in government
policy. As with past MMP elections, the minor party
that holds the balance of power will be able to
influence the policy agenda of the next government. We
summarize here the sometimes perplexing MMP system, the
controversy it has generated, and how it may determine
New Zealand's next government. End Summary.
NZ's Proportional Representation System
---------------------------------------
¶2. (U) Since 1996, New Zealand has operated under the
"Mixed Member Proportional" (MMP) system. Prior to
1996, New Zealand's voting system was the simple
plurality, winner-takes-all voting system. In 1993,
the then-National Government, bending to a growing
public desire to move away from the plurality voting
system, held a binding referendum in conjunction with
the general election that year on whether to change the
1993 Electoral Act in order to establish a MMP system.
The pro-MMP vote won by a comfortable margin, 54
percent to 46 percent.
¶3. (U) Under MMP, each voter casts two votes, one for
a local electorate MP (a constituency seat), and one
for a political party. Prior to the election, each
party submits a rank-order listing of its proportional
candidates. Each registered party's total number of
party votes decides its share of seats in Parliament.
A person can be a "dual candidate" by standing for an
electorate seat as well as being on the party list. A
dual candidate who wins an electorate seat has his or
her name deleted from the party list, and replaced by a
lower ranked name.
¶4. (U) In order to gain a share of Parliament seats, a
party must first qualify either by winning at least
five percent of all the party votes cast, or by winning
at least one electorate (constituency) seat. Each
qualified party is allocated enough party vote (list)
seats to add to any electorate seats it has won so that
its total number of seats is close to its share of all
the eligible party votes cast. Parties fill their list
seats by drawing off the allocated number of candidates
in the order in which they appear on the party's list,
and voters cannot change that order. The MPs chosen in
this way are called list MPs.
Overhang: Parliament Size Can Vary Under MMP
---------------------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) Fundamentally, each party holds seats in the
new Parliament in proportion to its party vote, not the
number of electorates it wins. If a party, usually a
minor party, wins more local electoral seats than its
percentage of the proportional vote, this makes it
impossible for another party, usually a large party
such a Labour or National, to hold the number of seats
it should according to proportional principles within
the original 120-seat Parliament. The solution is
overhang. The Electoral Commission determines how many
seats need to be added to 120 so that each party has no
fewer seats than its proportional vote. These extra
seats are the overhang.
¶6. (SBU) The overhang is a contentious issue because
the greater the overhang, the higher the majority
needed for a party to form a Government. Under the MMP
system, the New Zealand Parliament conventionally has
120 seats. The current Parliament has 121 MPs - the
one extra MP being earned by the Maori Party 2005
election when it won more electorate seats than the
party vote gave them, i.e., its party vote gave it
WELLINGTON 00000370 002.2 OF 004
three seats but the party actually won four electorate
(constituency) seats.
Coalition and Minority Governments the Norm
-------------------------------------------
¶7. (U) Since the MMP system was introduced in 1996,
there has never been a majority government (where one
party holds the majority of seats in Parliament thereby
allowing it to govern alone without a coalition with
other parties). Since 1996, New Zealand has only ever
had coalition governments (where one of the two major
parties makes an informal agreement with one or more
parties). The current Labour-led governing arrangement
is a coalition government formed with New Zealand
First, United Future and the Progressive Party.
Governments Formed in Post-Election Period
------------------------------------------
¶8. (U) In order to form a Government under MMP, one
party or bloc of parties must command a majority of the
votes in the House of Representatives. When a majority
is secured, a government is formed and the leader of
the biggest party becomes Prime Minister (although
formally the Prime Minister is selected by the Governor
General). In past MMP elections, the post-election
periods have been a contest between the two major
parties, Labour and National, to be the first to secure
enough minor party support to form a governing
majority.
¶9. (SBU) The post-election negotiating period does not
normally last more than couple of weeks. This period
can, however, take longer as it did in 1996 when
Winston Peters' New Zealand First Party took eight
weeks to decide whether to support National or Labour
(Peters eventually chose National after it promised to
make him Treasurer. Labour refused to promise him this
position).
Caretaker Government Until New One Formed
-----------------------------------------
¶10. (SBU) During the negotiations to form a
government, the current government remains in office,
but limits its actions pursuant to the common
convention of a caretaker government. It is expected
that the new government should be formed before January
8, 2009, the last possible date for Parliament to sit
following the 2008 election. Though unlikely, it is
possible that a caretaker government could continue
beyond this point until new government is formed. More
informally, there is strong pressure for parties to
complete formation of a government before summer
vacation begins in mid-December.
Referendum on MMP Overdue
-------------------------
¶11. (SBU) When the 1993 Electoral Act to introduce MMP
was drafted, a clause was inserted to allow for a
review of the system after two MMP elections and to
determine whether there should be a another referendum
on electoral reform. However, the country still awaits
a review as the parliamentary committee established in
2000 to examine MMP could not reach a decision on
whether another referendum was needed.
Country Divided Over MMP
------------------------
¶12. (SBU) On August 3, National Party leader John Key
promised that a government led by his party would hold
a binding referendum on MMP no later than 2011
followed, if necessary, by a second referendum to
establish what system should replace it. However, many
minor parties rely on MMP for their place in Parliament
and a future National government could struggle to win
sufficient support for a referendum. Prime Minister
Clark has been unenthusiastic about any change in the
current MMP system, as it favors the Labour Party,
which is the natural ally of the largest minor party,
the Greens. In a recent newspaper opinion piece,
former New Zealand Prime Minister Mike Moore (Labour)
WELLINGTON 00000370 003.2 OF 004
criticized MMP as an "inherently unstable" electoral
system which produces "squalid and sordid" post-
election deals.
¶13. (SBU) The New Zealand public is divided over the
merits of MMP. A Research New Zealand poll of August
2008 found forty-six percent favor a return to the old
plurality voting system with forty-one percent in
support of MMP. Many New Zealanders are not
comfortable with the hidden deals with minor parties
that characterize MMP governments. There is some
public anxiety that small parties are able to wield a
disproportionate amount of, sometimes radical,
influence on policy agendas.
Post-Election MMP Opposition Could Surge
----------------------------------------
¶14. (SBU) Since 1996, the party with the most party
votes has led the government and there is public
consensus (and tacit understanding among the political
parties) that this is a fair reflection of the will of
the people. However, if Labour in 2008 is able to form
a government despite losing to National on the party
vote, then many New Zealanders may see this as contrary
to the will of the country, and resentment towards MMP
could rise. Key has asserted that the biggest party has
the right to form the government but Labour has
disagreed, noting that governments should be formed by
the community of interest within parliament. Minor
parties have been coy on the issue, paying lip service
to due regard to the party that leads in party votes.
How Labour Forms an MMP Coalition
---------------------------------
¶15. (SBU) Helen Clark is an astute and successful
exponent of MPP. She has built and maintained durable
coalition and minority governments with a range of
smaller parties, some with vastly different political
philosophies. Going into the 2008 election, Clark can
rely on three parties - The Greens, NZ First and the
Progressives - to offer support for a Labour-led
government. Despite this ready-made coalition of
support, Labour faces three challenges in forming the
next government. Despite a narrowing gap, Labour is
still polling significantly behind National. Labour's
final party vote must exceed thirty-five percent to
give them any hope of forming a viable coalition. In
addition, the Greens vote must be close to ten percent.
Finally, Winston Peters' NZ First must win an
electorate seat or meet the five percent party vote
threshold to return to parliament. However, recent
polling suggests that it will be difficult for Labour
or the Greens to reach their watershed 35 and 10
percent, respectively. It will be almost impossible
for NZ First to secure the five percent needed to
return to parliament.
How National Forms and MMP Coalition
------------------------------------
¶16. (SBU) Going into the 2008 election, National is
ahead of Labour in the polls and is well positioned to
secure the most party votes. Nonetheless, National is
unlikely to reach fifty percent and will therefore have
to rely on support from the smaller parties. Thus far,
only two minor parties - the centrist United Future and
the right-wing ACT Party - have signaled their intent
to support a National-led Government. If National
polls in the high forties, then the support of United
Future and ACT, likely to get a maximum four sets
between them, may be enough for National to form the
next government. If National gets less than 47
percent, as some analysts predict, then the only other
real option open to National to form the next
government is to persuade the Maori Party to support
it. (Note: The Greens and Progressives have already
signaled that they will not support a National-led
Government, and Key has ruled out working with Winston
Peters' NZ First Party, even if it does return to
Parliament).
Maori Party Likely Kingmaker
----------------------------
WELLINGTON 00000370 004.2 OF 004
¶17. (SBU) In most MMP elections, there is usually a
smaller party playing the role as kingmaker. Its
decision to support one of the two main parties will
essentially decide the next government. In 2008, the
kingmaker role is very likely to be filled by the Maori
Party, which is expected to return to parliament with
five, possibly seven seats. The Maori Party has been
careful not to signal which party it will support, and
both Labour and National have courted it ahead of
November 8.
The Second Campaign
-------------------
¶18. (SBU) Unless one party gets fifty percent of the
votes, which is unlikely at the 2008 election, the next
government may not known until well after November 8 as
Labour and National engage in a second campaign: a
post-election negotiation period with the smaller
parties. The Maori Party has stated that it will
conduct a week-long series of consultation with its
supporters around the country to seek guidance as to
whom to support. Recent Maori polling suggests that as
much as 70 percent of Maori voters prefer Labour as a
partner in government -- a significant challenge for
National. The Maori Party could extract significant
concessions from the major parties in the post election
period.
Comment: The Decisive Election for MMP
---------------------------------------
¶19. (SBU) the more critical the role of a coalition in
forming New Zealand's next government, the more
pressure will grow to reconsider MMP. Two scenarios
could prove particularly contentious: first, if Labour
wins fewer seats but forms the government by winning
more minor party support; second, if Maori wins
concessions from National seems contrary to National's
platform. Either scenario could increase calls for an
MMP referendum as New Zealanders grow wary of the
excessive influence minor parties have wielded over
government policy under MMP. End Comment.
McCormick