

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 03OTTAWA1924, SCENE-SETTER FOR TRI- AND BILATERAL ENERGY MEETINGS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03OTTAWA1924.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
03OTTAWA1924 | 2003-07-09 13:53 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 OTTAWA 001924
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EB/ESC/ISC (MCMANUS AND DUDLEY), WHA/CAN
(RUNNING), OES/EGC (REIFSNYDER AND DEROSA)
USDOC FOR ITA/MAC -- OFFICE OF NAFTA
DOE FOR IA (A/S BAILEY, DAS DOBRIANSKY, PUMPHREY AND
DEUTSCH)
DEPT PASS USTR FOR MELLE AND CHANDLER
DEPT PASS INTERIOR FOR INT'L AFFAIRS
DEPT PASS FERC FOR KEVIN KELLY AND DONALD LEKANG
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG ETRD CA
SUBJECT: SCENE-SETTER FOR TRI- AND BILATERAL ENERGY MEETINGS
REF: (A) Ottawa 1812 (Uranium)
(B) Ottawa 1721 (Hydrogen Economy Partnership)
(C) Ottawa 1578 (NOAA Administrator's visit)
(D) Ottawa 687 (GOC climate change measures)
(E) Ottawa 566 (2002 energy trade data)
(F) Ottawa 503 (Natural gas in North America)
(G) Ottawa 334 (Protecting oil/gas pipelines)
(H) Halifax 52 (Atlantic offshore outlook)
(J) Calgary 44 (Alberta electric restructuring)
(K) 02 Vancouver 1153 (BC energy policy)
(L) 02 Calgary 473 (Alberta and Kyoto)
(M) 02 Ottawa 3205 (Atlantic offshore overview)
(N) 02 Ottawa 2474 (Power transmission barriers)
SUBJECT PARAS
CANADA ENERGY OVERVIEW 3 - 9
PARTNERSHIP FOR THE HYDROGEN ECONOMY 10
SHIFTING TO OILSANDS AND FRONTIERS 11 - 15
OILSANDS: CONTINUING EXPANSION 16 - 19
ARCTIC PIPELINES: APPROACHING REALITY 20 - 21
ELECTRICITY: ONTARIO RESTRUCTURING SKIDS 22 - 25
NUCLEAR: MOVING TOWARD LONG-TERM DISPOSAL 26
CLIMATE CHANGE 27 - 28
¶1. THIS MESSAGE IS SENSITIVE, BUT UNCLASSIFIED. NOT
FOR DISTRIBUTION OUTSIDE USG CHANNELS.
¶2. In preparation for the forthcoming meetings of the
North American Energy Working Group (NAEWG) and U.S.-
Canada Energy Consultative Mechanism (ECM) in Ottawa
July 15-17, post provides the following updated
overview of the very dynamic Canadian energy scene.
CANADIAN ENERGY OVERVIEW
------------------------
¶3. Since the early 1980's, Canada has been the single
largest foreign supplier of energy to the United
States; measured in total energy, it is our number one
energy supplier by a wide margin. Canada is the
world's fifth largest energy producer and a net
exporter of all major energy products including oil and
petroleum products, natural gas, electric power,
uranium, and energy technology and services. The
United States is virtually Canada's sole customer for
crude oil and natural gas exports, which grew steeply
over the past decade and a half, as well as its sole
customer for exports of electric power.
¶4. Canadian and U.S. government efforts are coordinated
across the full range of energy-related technologies
including climate monitoring, carbon sequestration,
clean coal, hydrogen and nuclear. Canada has been
invited to participate in the Carbon Sequestration
Leadership Forum (CSLF) and the International
Partnership for the Hydrogen Economy (IPHE).
¶5. OIL: Canada supplies more oil and oil products to
Americans than any other country, including Saudi
Arabia. In 2002 Canada exported approximately 1.4
million barrels per day of crude oil, plus the
equivalent of about 500,000 barrels per day in
petroleum products and partially processed oil. In
2002, imports of Canadian oil and petroleum products
accounted for about about 17 percent of U.S. oil
imports and nearly 10 percent of total U.S. oil demand.
¶6. GAS: Natural gas makes up the largest part - more
than one-third - of Canada's primary energy production.
In 2002 Canada exported 3.74 trillion cubic feet of
natural gas, making up 93 percent of U.S. gas imports
and 18 percent of total U.S. gas demand. (See ref F
for a Canadian perspective on North American gas supply
issues).
¶7. ELECTRIC POWER: Canada exported about 35 terawatt-
hours of electric power to the United States in 2002.
Canada's total electricity exports peaked in 2000 and
are now on a declining trend, due to changes in demand
patterns, a lack of capital investment in both the U.S.
and Canadian electric power industries and the
difficulty of building new transmission capacity (see
ref N for analysis).
¶8. NUCLEAR: Canada is the world's largest uranium
producer (ref A), supplying about one-third of world
production and 20 to 30 percent of U.S. demand. A
Canadian Government-owned firm, AECL, is one of the
world's most active vendors of nuclear reactors, having
supplied units to China and South Korea in the past
decade.
¶9. For further data on Canadian energy production and
trade, refer to the EIA's Country Analysis Brief on
Canada (www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/canada.html), or the
GOC's National Energy Board website (www.neb.gc.ca).
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR THE HYDROGEN ECONOMY
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶10. Canada has been invited to participate in the IPHE.
Working-level GOC officials appear to be cautiously
interested, but have significant concerns about how IPHE
will relate to the IEA's Hydrogen Coordination Group (ref
B). They also have numerous questions about IPHE's possible
structure and process.
SHIFTING TO OILSANDS AND FRONTIERS
----------------------------------
¶11. Canada's conventional oil and gas fields are mainly
located in or adjacent to the western province of
Alberta, which is north of Montana. While the cost of
finding new reserves in this region has risen
significantly in recent years, the industry continues
to thrive, notably in the less-exploited northwestern
portion of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin which
extends into the neighboring province of British
Columbia. A relatively new energy/mining technology,
the extraction of oil from oilsands (vast deposits of
oily dirt) in northern Alberta, became profitable
during the 1990's. Multi-billion-dollar investments
are ongoing in that industry. See paragraphs 16-19
below for details.
¶12. The ability of supplies to keep up with North
America's natural gas demand has been the subject of
recent controversy in Canada, as it has in the United
States. There is now broad, well-developed support
among stakeholders to construct a pipeline down the
Mackenzie River Valley, which would allow development
of natural gas fields in the Mackenzie River Delta and
Beaufort Sea areas (east of Alaska's North Slope). The
first formal steps toward applying for regulatory
approval for such a pipeline are expected to be taken
in the second half of 2003. While the amount of gas
which will be accessed by this pipeline is a fraction
as large as that in Prudhoe Bay, the barriers to
pipeline development are lower, and the gas could begin
to reach southern markets around 2010.
¶13. Substantial oil and gas deposits under the
continental shelf off Canada's Atlantic coast entered
commercial production in the past decade, highlighted
by the placement of a large fixed platform on the
"Hibernia" oilfield (east of Newfoundland) in 1997, and
the inauguration of natural gas exports from Nova
Scotia to New England through the Maritimes and
Northeast Pipeline early in 2000.
¶14. The Hibernia oilfield, which is being exploited by
a consortium of private oil firms (Exxon/Mobil is the
operator), is estimated to contain more than 600
million barrels of oil. Major oil firms are now
beginning production from the nearby "Terra Nova"
oilfield, which has reserves of about 300-400 million
barrels. Conservative estimates put East Coast
discovered reserves of oil in the two billion barrels
range, with possible eventual production rates of up to
one million barrels per day.
¶15. Offshore natural gas production from the Sable
Island area, east of Nova Scotia, began early in 2000.
Most of this gas is exported to New England - bringing
large-scale natural gas service to these states for the
first time, and helping to stabilize their winter
heating costs. Gas reserves around Sable Island have
been estimated at 3.5 trillion cubic feet, but more
drilling is needed to complete this picture (ref H).
There are much larger gas resources in Newfoundland and
Labrador, but environmental and distance problems will
slow these developments.
OILSANDS: CONTINUING EXPANSION
-------------------------------
¶16. The economically recoverable oil resources in
Alberta's oilsands are many times larger than the sum
of Canada's other oil reserves. Oilsands (aka
"tarsands" or "heavy oil") are vast deposits of oily
dirt which can be processed (economically at current
oil prices) into "synthetic crude" which can then be
refined in conventional oil refineries. Canadian
authorities estimate reserves in the oilsands to be the
equivalent of 175 billion barrels assuming current
technology and economic conditions, and up to 315
billion barrels with technological advances and some
price increases. Oilsands already account for more
than half of Canada's crude oil output, and for most of
the recent increases in Canada's production.
¶17. Crude bitumen production from oilsands increased by
about 25 percent in 2002, due to large ongoing capital
investments. The Canadian government has predicted
that if currently planned projects are realized, by
2010 Canada will provide approximately 20.5 percent of
U.S. oil imports and 14.1 percent of total U.S. oil
supply. The Alberta Energy and Utilities Board
projects that synthetic crude oil production from
Alberta's oilsands will expand by 237 percent from 2002
to 2012.
¶18. During the past year, first Oil and Gas Journal and
subsequently the U.S. Energy Information Administration
began to recognize Canada's oil sands as "proven
reserves" -- a decision which dramatically increases
Canada's petroleum reserves on paper, to about 180
billion barrels, making Canada the world's second-
largest reserve holder after Saudi Arabia. While the
validity of counting the oilsands as "proven reserves"
has been subject to some ongoing controversy (notably
following a critical item by Jeff Gerth in the New York
Times on June 18), their economic reality is affirmed
by the many billions in actual capital investment which
they are attracting and the resulting current increases
in oil output.
¶19. COMMENT: There is growing confidence among
Canadian stakeholders and analysts that this resource
imposes an effective limit on the price which North
America must pay for overseas oil in the long run,
absent severe foreign supply disruptions. Embassy
shares this view. END COMMENT.
ARCTIC PIPELINES: MACKENZIE LINE CLOSER TO REALITY
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶20. IN RECENT MONTHS, STAKEHOLDERS IN AN ANTICIPATED NATURAL
GAS PIPELINE DOWN THE MACKENZIE RIVER VALLEY IN NORTHWESTERN
CANADA HAVE TAKEN FURTHER STEPS TO PAVE THE ROAD FOR A
FORMAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. TRANSCANADA PIPELINES (TCPL),
ONE OF THE WORLD'S LARGEST PIPELINE OPERATORS, SIGNED A DEAL
IN JUNE TO PROVIDE FINANCING TO ABORIGINAL PIPELINE GROUP
(APG), ENABLING APG TO TAKE A ONE-THIRD OWNERSHIP SHARE IN
THE PIPELINE. THE MAIN PRODUCING PARTNER IS IMPERIAL OIL,
THE CANADIAN SUBSIDIARY OF EXXON. AN INITIAL APPLICATION TO
REGULATORS IS EXPECTED IN THE FALL OF 2003.
¶21. STAKEHOLDERS LESS AND LESS VIEW THE MACKENZIE LINE AND
ANOTHER, LARGER PIPELINE TO ALASKA'S PRUDHOE BAY AS BEING
INCOMPATIBLE. THIS IS BECAUSE IT APPEARS INCREASINGLY
LIKELY THAT THE SMALLER AND SHORTER MACKENZIE LINE WILL BE
CONSTRUCTED FIRST, AND BECAUSE THERE IS INCREASING CONCERN
THAT NORTH AMERICA'S DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS MAY OUTSTRIP
SUPPLIES OVER THE COMING DECADE (REF F). CANADIAN
OBJECTIONS TO POSSIBLE FISCAL INCENTIVES TO SUPPORT THE
ALASKA PIPELINE FOCUS ON THE POSSIBLE MARKET-DISTORTING
EFFECTS OF SUCH SUBSIDIES - PARTICULARLY IF THEY GO BEYOND
THE SCOPE OF MEASURES TAKEN TO ENCOURAGE INVESTMENT IN OTHER
GAS PRODUCING REGIONS.
ELECTRICITY: RESTRUCTURING SKIDS IN ONTARIO
--------------------------------------------
¶22. Electric power is primarily under provincial
jurisdiction in Canada, and is traditionally dominated by
provincial government-owned firms. Several provinces have
taken steps to restructure their electricity sectors on
competitive principles. Alberta has achieved a degree of
competition at both wholesale and retail levels which has
been characterized as a "messy success" (ref J).
¶23. In Ontario in recent years, the provincial monopoly
utility was split up into generation, transmission and
distribution components, and some competition was introduced
at the retail level. However, in April 2002 a planned
initial public offering of the provincial government-owned
transmission grid operator, Hydro One, was blocked by a
court ruling. Transmission grid issues quickly became
politicized, particularly when power prices rose during the
peak summer period. In November 2002, the Ontario
government froze retail power rates at 4.3 cents/KWH for
most customers until 2006. Since then, the government has
struggled to increase generating capacity with little help
from private investment. Re-starting mothballed nuclear
plants is crucial to its survival strategy, but the first re-
starts - expected this summer and fall - have been delayed.
¶24. Canada's National Energy Board (NEB) predicts that
domestic electricity demand will grow slightly faster than
supply through 2025, causing electricity exports to the
United States to decline significantly from current levels
in the long run. This is driven by the trend for generating
facilities to be located closer to end users. One major
reason for this is the difficulty of constructing new
transmission capacity due to a range of concerns including
environmental/agricultural opposition, regulatory hurdles,
and uncertainty associated with the evolving market
environment for electric power. Another is the growing
availability of natural gas and the efficiency of gas-driven
generating technology.
¶25. Canada still has abundant undeveloped hydroelectric
potential, but these resources tend to be located far from
densely populated markets. Provinces with large undeveloped
sites include Newfoundland and Labrador (Churchill Falls
II), Quebec (Great Whale) and Manitoba (Nelson River).
There is significant potential for cogeneration of electric
power in oilsands operations, but here as well, it will be
difficult for the resulting power to reach major markets
unless construction of long-distance power lines becomes
easier.
NUCLEAR: MOVING FORWARD ON LONG-TERM DISPOSAL
--------------------------------------------- -
¶26. Like the United States, Canada has no permanent disposal
facility for its nuclear waste, which is currently stored at
reactor sites. As in the U.S., proposals to move this waste
to any other site(s) provoke strong local resistance.
During 2002, Canada passed legislation which creates a Waste
Management Organization, funded by nuclear energy firms, to
develop a long-term approach to storing radioactive waste.
The GOC plans to make a decision by 2006 in favor of one of
the three major options (deep geological storage,
centralized surface/subsurface, or continued storage at
reactor sites).
CLIMATE CHANGE
--------------
¶27. In the spring of 2002 the USG and GOC announced a more
concerted effort to coordinate our climate change programs,
with a particular focus on energy, especially energy
efficiency, clean energy, clean coal, renewable and
alternative energy and carbon sequestration. At Prime
Minister Chretien's initiative, Canada formally ratified the
Kyoto Accord at the end of 2002, despite vocal criticism
from provincial governments and industries (with Alberta and
the oil and gas sector leading the way - ref L). Critics
were concerned that the burden of compliance would fall
disproportionately on certain regions/industries and also
that compliance would place Canada's economy at a lasting
competitive disadvantage vis--vis the United States.
¶28. In its spring 2003 budget, the GOC committed C$1.5
billion (about US$1 billion) over five years directly to
achieving greenhouse gas emission reductions, plus modest
additional funds for research and long-term technology
development. GOC officials are now engaged in determining
what process will be used to allocate this spending.
CELLUCCI