

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 04MONTREAL1484, US-VISIT STAKEHOLDERS/MEDIA BRIEFING IN MONTREAL
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04MONTREAL1484.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
04MONTREAL1484 | 2004-11-18 18:04 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Consulate Montreal |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 MONTREAL 001484
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR CA/VO/I JOHN COOK, WHA/CAN AND WHA/PA
DHS FOR US-VISIT ROBERT MOCNY
OTTAWA FOR CONS, PD AND DHS/ICE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CVIS ELTN ECON PBTS CA
SUBJECT: US-VISIT STAKEHOLDERS/MEDIA BRIEFING IN MONTREAL
¶1. Summary. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) US-VISIT
Deputy Director Robert Mocny provided two US-VISIT briefings
on November 5 to stakeholders (shippers, customs brokers,
Canadian immigration officers) and media, respectively. All
attendees were provided a handout: "Fact Sheet: U.S. Land
Borders." The briefings went very well, and most attendees
appeared relieved to have it reiterated that Canadian
citizens who do not need visas are not yet subject to the
program. Post is considering the possibility of holding a
followup US-VISIT digital videoconference (DVC) with
stakeholders not included in the November 5 briefings.
(Notetakers were ConSec Officers Stephen Ashby and Maya
Harris.) End summary.
¶2. Stakeholders Briefing. Mr. Mocny described the
methodology and implementation schedule for the US-VISIT
program. He cited four key DHS goals for US-VISIT:
- To enhance security of U.S. citizens and visitors
- To facilitate legitimate trade and travel
- To ensure integrity of U.S. immigration system
- To protect privacy of visitors
Mr. Mocny also detailed to stakeholders the Congressional
mandates driving the US-VISIT implementation and the methods
for redressing any errors that visitors may find in US-VISIT
records pertaining to them.
¶3. Stakeholders' Briefing: Questions and Answers.
a. What provisions are being made for exit recording and
control?
Answer: None will be immediately put into place, but the
plan is to test radio frequency (RF) checking of "exit
receipts" at 7 trial ports of entry (POE) in June-July 2005.
Future plans include biometric verification of exiting
visitors.
b. What about passports that get stolen before biometrics
are established at a POE for an individual?
Answer: If the perpetrator used the stolen travel document,
he/she would be biometrically recorded. Subsequently, when
the legitimate traveler is screened, the traveler would be
required to prove identity while in the secondary interview
and the bad guy would be added to the impostor watch-list.
c. What prevents terrorists from just using Canadian IDs to
avoid US-VISIT?
Answer: We rely on Canadian officials to safeguard against
terrorists and other bad guys getting legitimate
identification (ID). Inspectors also guard against their
entry.
d. Will US-VISIT profile any race or ethnicity?
Answer: No. Everyone, except U.S. and Canadian citizens who
do not need visas, must be screened.
e. So, Visa Waiver Program folks will undergo US-VISIT, even
on charters?
Answer: Yes.
f. Will US-VISIT increase information sharing between U.S.
and Canadian security and law enforcement?
Answer: Not formally, but all the current information-
sharing arrangements still apply.
¶4. Media Briefing. Media representation included most major
organizations, such as CBC, The Gazette, TQS, Le Devoir and
Canadian Press. US-VISIT Deputy Director Robert Mocny
provided an overview of the basic elements of the US-VISIT
Program, outlined the DHS goals in US-VISIT implementation
and summarized the program's applicability for prospective
visitors.
¶5. Media Briefing: Questions and Answers.
a. Why were airports the first to implement US-VISIT?
(Note. The reporter who posed the question stated that if
she were a terrorist or anyone else attempting to escape the
notice of border officials then she would "definitely
attempt to enter the U.S. via land." End note.)
Answer: Mocny stated that DHS adhered to deadlines decided
by the U.S. Congress after the law making body appropriated
$100 million for the program. Mocny listed the deadlines,
beginning with the benchmark December 31, 2003, date to
launch US-VISIT at all Canadian airport POEs, then the 17
busiest land POEs by December 31, 2004, followed by all POEs
by December 31, 2005.
b. How will US-VISIT affect landed immigrants and Canadian
citizens?
Answer: Mocny emphasized that US-VISIT will have minimal
impact on landed immigrants (LI), as they presently already
report to border officials for secondary interview.
According to Mocny, the only changes LIs will face are the
biometric fingerprint scan and facial imaging. He added
that pilot programs at the Sarnia and Port Huron POEs have
shown there is no "real" added inconvenience to LIs.
Further, he stated LIs may even experience fewer delays at
POEs because US-VISIT eliminates the need for prospective
U.S. visitors to complete Form I-94. Mocny underscored that
the pilot programs at Sarnia and Port Huron, and the
implementation of US-VISIT at Canadian airports, have been
successful and important to creating a secure medium to
collect biographic data on potential U.S. visitors (one that
also guards against identity theft).
c. How will US-VISIT affect Canadians with dual
citizenship?
Answer: Dual nationals who declare either their Canadian or
American citizenship while presenting the appropriate
corroborating identification at POEs will not be affected by
US-VISIT. However, visitors to the U.S. who claim
citizenship to a third country upon arrival at the POE will
be subject to US-VISIT and may be expected to take part in a
secondary interview.
d. Does DHS have plans to begin fingerprinting and
photographing Canadian citizens?
Answer: Mocny stated that DHS understands that in addition
to securing the border, the cross border economy still has
to be maintained and that DHS recognizes that most people
(at least 80%) who cross the US-Canadian border do not have
malicious intentions. However, Mocny further stated DHS
does not believe the border is secure; that the majority of
people stopped through US-VISIT were taken into secondary
inspection because of possible intent to overstay their
visit in the U.S. and that many people with criminal
convictions have been apprehended through the program. He
noted that while presently the only Canadians who must
participate in US-VISIT are those that require visas (i.e.
fianc(e)s of American citizens, immigrants, treaty-trade
investors), the 9/11 Commission made specific
recommendations on the possible need to include Canadians in
security measures.
e. Is it true all Canadians will require a passport to
enter the U.S. as of December 31? If not, have discussions
on the creation of a continental card resumed?
Answer: Mocny stated that DHS has no current plan to require
Canadians to bear passports at U.S. borders, but that this
may be subject to change based upon the will of the U.S.
Congress. Regarding a continental-wide identification,
Mocny stated that while that remains an option for the
future, speculation would not be useful.
f. Will US-VISIT target minorities?
Answer: Mocny stated that the only foreign nationals not
subject to US-VISIT at POEs are Canadians, a facet of the
program that will ensure that everyone is treated equally.
He went on to state while Canadians are exempt from US-VISIT
at present, only time will tell whether Canadians will
remain exempt from program participation.
g. What happens to the biographic data that is collected
from US-VISIT?
Answer: Mocny replied that the data collected would be
distributed within DHS as needed. He added that an
inquiring foreign national would have access to the list of
U.S. governmental entities that has access to their
information. Mocny stated there is no plan to share the
information collected from US-VISIT with Canadian officials
and that the collection of biographic data through US-VISIT
has allowed DHS to track the length of visits of foreign
nationals to the U.S.
h. Will the implementation of US-VISIT have any impact on
the American traveler?
Answer: Mocny stated that US-VISIT will have no effect on
the average American traveler.
i. Post 9/11--should Canadians get accustomed to the idea
that they will eventually be subject to programs similar to
US-VISIT?
Answer: Mocny reaffirmed that the only change in the
procedural status quo was the launch of US-VISIT at the 17
busiest land POEs, expected to be fully operational by the
December 31, 2004, deadline. He added that while U.S.
policy may change in the future, he could not speculate on
those potential changes.
¶6. Post is considering the possibility of conducting a
followup US-VISIT DVC, as we had insufficient lead time to
notify other stakeholders (ie., representatives from the
Visa Waiver Program countries' Consulates General in our
district, other travel and trade-related contacts) who may
have benefited from the November 5 briefing.
ALLEN