

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08USOSCE150, FSC-PC JUNE 4: CYBER SECURITY AND PREPARATION FOR
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08USOSCE150.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08USOSCE150 | 2008-06-06 12:43 | 2011-04-24 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Mission USOSCE |
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHVEN #0150/01 1581243
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 061243Z JUN 08 CTG SECSTATE #0047W
FM USMISSION USOSCE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5767
INFO RUCNOSC/ORG FOR SECURITY CO OP IN EUR COLLECTIVE
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0530
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 1084
RUEKJCS/DIA WASHDC
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 1029
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RHMFIUU/HQ USAFE RAMSTEIN AB GE//POLAD/XPXC//
RHMFISS/CDRUSAREUR HEIDELBERG GE
RHMFISS/CDR USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE//ECJ5-T/ECPLAD/ECCS//
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RUEASWA/DTRA ALEX WASHINGTON DC//OSAE
RUESDT/DTRA-OSES DARMSTADT GE
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5-DDPMA-E/DDPMA-IN/CAC//
RUEADWD/DA WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS USOSCE 000150
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR VCI/CCA, VCI/NRRC, EUR/RPM, EUR/PRA, EUR/CARC,
SCA/CEN, SCA/RA, PM/WRA
JCS FOR J5
OSD FOR ISA (PERENYI)
NSC FOR DOWLEY
USUN FOR LEGAL, POL
CENTCOM FOR CCJ5-C, POLAD
UNVIE FOR AC
GENEVA FOR CD
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL OSCE KCFE KCIP EN FI XG
SUBJECT: FSC-PC JUNE 4: CYBER SECURITY AND PREPARATION FOR
BMS
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The Estonian defense minister and other
speakers discussed cyber security and the need for the OSCE
to remain involved in coordinating the efforts of
participating States (pS) in responding to emerging threats
to information and communication systems. Speakers extolled
the Council of Europe's Convention on Cybercrime as an
example of the international cooperation needed.
¶2. (SBU) The special working group to prepare the OSCE
contribution to the Biennial Meeting of States (BMS) on the
UN Program of Action on Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW)
discussed the products needed for the July 14-16 meeting in
New York. These will include an oral presentation and a
written report. Delegations generally agreed to focus on
existing programs and documents, including brokering and
end-user certificates. Germany lamented the absence of any
normative work on SALW over the last four years and
recommended considering the merger of the OSCE Documents on
SALW and Stockpiles of Conventional Ammunition. End summary.
Cyber Security
--------------
¶3. (SBU) Jaak Aaviksoo, the Estonian Minister of Defense,
told the June 4 joint PC-FSC meeting there was a continued
need for international and domestic legal frameworks regimes
to address threats to cyber security, including use of the
Internet by terrorists and attacks on the Internet and other
information systems. Aaviksoo urged all countries to join
the European Council's Convention on Cybercrime. Inter-state
cooperation was essential, and the OSCE could have a role in
fostering cooperation among policymakers, experts, and other
stakeholders. (FSC-PC.DEL/18/08)
¶4. (SBU) The UK, Canada (FSC-PC.DEL/23/08), Germany, France,
and Russia (Voronkov), agreed that the OSCE could respond to
the emerging threats by further discussion and exploring ways
to develop concrete actions, although Russia's definition of
cybercrime seemed to include websites that propagated
extremist views without necessarily directly connecting them
to terrorist activities.
¶5. (SBU) Voronkov welcomed further OSCE efforts on cyber
security, mentioning favorably "recent documents and
conferences" on the subject, particularly the "Public-Private
Partnership." Voronkov noted a connection between terrorist
use of the Internet and unrest in the Caucasus. He reported
that terrorists use sites controlled from computers in the
Baltics, Finland, and Sweden. Voronkov called for
international legal frameworks to identify terrorist websites
and monitor their activities. Such legal regimes need not
conflict with human rights principles, he added, but would
actually buttress a fundamental human right to life itself.
(FSC-PC.DEL/22/08)
¶6. (SBU) Belarus (Pavlov) noted the use of the Internet to
incite ethnic and religious hatred. He said transnational
crimes committed through the Internet require international
cooperation to prevent or prosecute them. The OSCE could
work with specialist organizations like Interpol to
coordinate national efforts while avoiding politicization of
cyber security. (FSC-PC.DEL/24/08)
¶7. (SBU) The U.S. (Finley) mentioned the recent cyber attacks
on Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Internet sites in Belarus
and supported further OSCE work on cyber security,
particularly in cooperation with other international
organizations like NATO. Ambassador Finley also announced
the distribution of remarks on cyber security by Homeland
Security Secretary Chertoff at the 2008 RSA conference.
(FSC-PC.DEL/20/08)
¶8. (SBU) Armenia (Tabibian) observed it was perhaps less
vulnerable than some pS because its information
infrastructure was less developed. He described information
technology as a "Faustian deal" that brings added
vulnerabilities as well as advantages. A fundamental concern
in cyber security should be the privacy of the individual, he
concluded, as the cyber realm creates a "culture of
licentiousness and gossip."
European Council's Convention on Cybercrime
-------------------------------------------
¶9. (SBU) Alexander Seger, head of the economic crime division
at the legal directorate in the Council of Europe, explained
the organization and provisions of the Council's Convention
on Cybercrime, which the U.S. and 22 other states have
ratified. He noted that cybercrime is transnational, yet
there is no consolidated international response to it. He
said there remained a need to balance states' interest in
preventing and prosecuting cybercrime and protecting privacy.
The Convention on Cybercrime contains both procedural and
substantive provisions, including measures for preserving
electronic evidence that are relevant to general criminal
investigations. Seger touched on the Council's Convention
for the Prevention of Terrorism, which the U.S. has not
joined, and concluded there was at present no need for
additional international legal instruments beyond these two
conventions. (FSC-PC.DEL/19/08)
Finnish Approaches to Cyber Security
------------------------------------
¶10. (SBU) Colonel Aapo Cederberg of the Finnish Ministry of
Defense explained his country's "total defense" approach to
securing vital national functions. This draws on the legacy
of Finland's "nation in arms" experiences in World War II and
involves coordinated action between different sectors of
Finnish society. Total defense is designed to preserve a
well-functioning economy and infrastructure, including
information and communications technology. (FSC-PC.DEL/15/08)
¶11. (SBU) Erka Koivunen, head of the emergency response team
from the Finnish Communication Regulatory Authority, briefed
the organization and functions of his team, which provides a
coordinated response to information security incidents.
KoivUnen said that Finland had a robust domestic IT
infrastructure but was still dependent on outside resources
for its functioning, e.g., the "main route" to the Internet
passes physically through Sweden. Thanks in part to the
efforts of his agency, Finland has among the "cleanest"
networks in the world, as measured by the presence of
"malware" in host servers. (FSC-PC.DEL/16/08)
Azerbaijan Attacks France (and Armenia)
---------------------------------------
¶12. (SBU) Azerbaijan (Ismayilov) launched a long tirade
against France for mentioning, in its report of a Vienna
Document inspection in Armenia, the Armenian charge that
Azerbaijan is in excess of its CFE equipment quotas.
Ismayilov said the place to raise this issue was the Joint
Consultative Group. He criticized France's apparent
partiality to Armenia, particularly offensive because France
was a member of the OSCE-sponsored Minsk Group charged with
resolving the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over
Nagorno-Karabakh. He also referred to his country's May 14
intervention in the FSC challenging Armenia's nil response in
its 2008 Code of Conduct submission to the question of how
many of its forces were serving outside its national
territory.
¶13. (SBU) Armenia (Hovhannisyan) complained it had not been
given warning of the Azerbaijani intervention. France
(Simonet), also noting the absence of warning, reserved the
right to reply.
Georgia Reports More Russian Troops Deployed
--------------------------------------------
¶14. (SBU) Georgia reported that Russia had deployed
additional forces into the disputed separatist region of
Abkhazia without Georgian consent. Despite Russian
assurances of benign intentions, Georgia saw these recent
deployments as part of Russia's large-scale preparation for
aggression against it and called on all states to prevent
this aggression. (Note: The Georgian and Russian
delegations were at this time meeting separately as part of
the consultative mechanism of Chapter III of the Vienna
Document 1999 to discuss the situation in Abkhazia including
the April 20 UAV incident. End note.)
Ireland Pitches Cluster Munitions Ban
-------------------------------------
¶15. (SBU) Ireland (O'Leary) announced an agreement to ban
cluster munitions had been completed by a diplomatic
conference in Dublin recently. O'Leary called on all states
to join the agreement while noting the absence from the
conference of "some of the major producers of cluster
munitions." The agreement will, he said, stigmatize any use
of these munitions.
SALW/SCA Donations
------------------
¶16. (SBU) Finland announced it was contributing 345,000 euros
to Tajikistan for stockpile security, phase II, task 3 of the
OSCE SALW project there. Finland also will contribute 15,000
euros to Albania for melange disposition.
¶17. (SBU) Denmark announced it too was contributing 15,000
euros for melange disposition in Albania.
Code of Conduct Outreach
------------------------
¶18. (SBU) Austria (Eischer), the Code of Conduct coordinator,
announced a September 22-24 conference in Almaty, Kazakhstan
for central Asian pS on the Code of Conduct. Details and
invitations will follow.
¶19. (SBU) Estonia (Parts), the FSC chair, announced it
planned a June Code of Conduct outreach meeting with the OSCE
Partners for Cooperation. She solicited views and
suggestions for content of the meeting from all pS.
Special Working Group Meeting on BMS and Future SALW Actions
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
¶20. (SBU) Discussion of the OSCE contribution of the Third
Biennial Meeting of States on the UN Program of Action on
SALW (BMS), to be held in New York July 14-18, at the special
working group meeting did not result in agreement on the
specifics of the contribution, although there was general
support for including information about ongoing OSCE programs
in SALW including normative documents. The chair announced
that Vasily Pavlov (Belarus), the current chair of the
Informal Group of Friends of SALW, and Colonel Steven
Hartnell (UK), who will follow Pavlov in the chair this
summer, will represent the OSCE at the BMS. The chair also
reported that the OSCE planned a side event and exhibition of
its SALW work at the BMS.
¶21. (SBU) There was prolonged discussion over the content of
the oral and written reports the OSCE will present at the
BMS. Belarus (Pavlov) suggested including information about
both the normative and practical sides of OSCE work on SALW,
including currently pending draft decisions for an
information exchange of end-user certificates and a Best
Practices Guide on regulation of air transport of SALW, as
well as the recent decision on updating the OSCE MANPADS
export controls principles.
¶22. (SBU) Germany (Schweizer) said that the limited time for
an oral presentation meant it should concentrate solely on
implementation of existing documents and project work. This
would include implementation of extant documents on brokering
and end-user certificates. Schweizer lamented the lack of
OSCE normative work on SALW over the last four years. The
OSCE seemed to be better at generating ideas that others
realized than doing the work itself, he said.
¶23. (SBU) Russia (Petr Litavrin, Russian MFA security affairs
and disarmament deputy director) countered that the OSCE had
an enviable record of accomplishments in SALW, unlike the UN
Program of Action (UNPOA) that had limited impact because of
funding constraints. Litavrin also noted that UNPOA reports
had diminishing substance and influence. Litavrin suggested
a focus on international brokering of SALW, as well as export
controls and MANPADS.
¶24. (SBU) Finland (Kangste) reminded that the OSCE could
participate in the thematic sessions at the BMS besides the
meeting for regional organizations. Sweden (Nilsson)
suggested it was good news that, as Schweizer had noted,
other organizations were now sharing the burden of work on
SALW.
¶25. (SBU) Slovenia, as EU president, supported concentration
on physical security and stockpile management, surplus
destruction, marking and tracing, export and border controls,
and the control of brokering. The EU continues to support
work on an international treaty to regulate trade in arms.
(FSC.DEL/110/08)
¶26. (SBU) The Conflict Prevention Center (Kytomaki) reported
on its participation in the OSCE and European-Atlantic
Partnership Council "synergy" conference May 28-30 in
Brussels at NATO. Kytomaki reported the conference concluded
there was insufficient implementation of existing SALW
obligations and scarce cooperation among international and
regional organizations. The conference report is available
through the CPC.
¶27. (SBU) The chair will prepare the reports for the BMS with
the assistance of the CPC and the chair of the IGOF of SALW.
Germany made a point of wanting to see the draft reports
before the BMS, as did Turkey. Sweden and Canada, while
happy to review the drafts, expressed full confidence in the
FSC chair and do not believe additional discussion of the
drafts would be necessary.
Future Actions on SALW
----------------------
¶28. (SBU) During the last part of the special working group,
delegations were asked to consider future actions on SALW.
Germany (Schweizer) suggested it was time to undertake a
review of the OSCE Document on SALW. In the context of the
BMS, he suggested, perhaps OSCE SALW reporting requirements
could be "standardized" in light of the UNPOA. Schweizer
also suggested considering the merger of the OSCE Documents
of SALW and Conventional Ammunition.
¶29. (SBU) Russia (Litavrin) rejoined that SALW and SCA were
two different threats: SALW work meant efforts to prevent
inappropriate transfer, while ammunition and other munitions
represented a safety and environmental threat wherever they
were. Schweizer responded that, when considering a merger of
the documents, he had in mind "SALW and its ammunition," not
the entire realm of explosive devices and munitions.
Litavrin separately remarked to USDel that he anticipated
some personnel changes at MFA, particularly in his department
(DVBR). These could result in "fresh approaches" to security
issues.
¶30. (SBU) Sweden (Nilsson) agreed it might be time to
undertake a thorough review of the OSCE Document on SALW.
Should the OSCE task itself to do this at the 2008
Ministerial in Helsinki? Perhaps the OSCE should also review
the need for separate documents on SALW and ammunition.
Belarus said any review would involve experts from capitals
meeting under OSCE auspices. Finland said the OSCE should
seek a "global" endorsement of its SALW norms and programs.
Switzerland is prepared to explore further work in SALW.
Future Meetings
---------------
¶31. (SBU) The FSC will return to its standard agenda in the
Plenary and working groups at its next meeting on June 11.
Austria (Eischer) told USDel that it will make a presentation
on "private military companies" at the June 25 FSC.
FINLEY