

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 10OTTAWA29, Canada's Conservative Government and its Arctic Focus
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10OTTAWA29.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
10OTTAWA29 | 2010-01-21 16:52 | 2011-05-11 22:00 | CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN | Embassy Ottawa |
Appears in these articles: http://aptn.ca/pages/news/2011/05/11/while-harper-talked-tough-with-nato-on-arctic-u-s-believed-pm-all-bark-no-bite/ |
VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHOT #0029/01 0211652
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 211652Z JAN 10
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0294
INFO RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN 0001
RUEHGA/AMCONSUL CALGARY
RUEHHA/AMCONSUL HALIFAX
RUEHHE/AMEMBASSY HELSINKI 0003
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 0006
RUEHMT/AMCONSUL MONTREAL
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO 0006
RUEHON/AMCONSUL TORONTO
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
RUEHRK/AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK 0001
RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM 0008
RUEHVC/AMCONSUL VANCOUVER
id: 244740
date: 1/21/2010 16:52
refid: 10OTTAWA29
origin: Embassy Ottawa
classification: CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
destination:
header:
VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHOT #0029/01 0211652
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 211652Z JAN 10
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0294
INFO RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN 0001
RUEHGA/AMCONSUL CALGARY
RUEHHA/AMCONSUL HALIFAX
RUEHHE/AMEMBASSY HELSINKI 0003
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 0006
RUEHMT/AMCONSUL MONTREAL
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO 0006
RUEHON/AMCONSUL TORONTO
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
RUEHRK/AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK 0001
RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM 0008
RUEHVC/AMCONSUL VANCOUVER
----------------- header ends ----------------
C O N F I D E N T I A L OTTAWA 000029
NOFORN
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR WHA/EX, WHA/CAN, OES/OA
AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PASS TO APP WINNIPEG
AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PASS TO AMCONSUL QUEBEC
E.O. 12958: DECL: 2020/01/20
TAGS: PREL PBTS PGOV SENV CA XQ
SUBJECT: Canada's Conservative Government and its Arctic Focus
CLASSIFIED BY: Eric Benjaminson, Economic Minister-Counselor, State
Department, Embassy Ottawa; REASON: 1.4(D)
¶1. (C/NF) Summary: Since the day after his initial election victory
in January 2006, Canadian PM Stephen Harper has continually played
up his government's commitment to defending Canada's "North" (the
landmass above 60 degrees North latitude represents about 40% of
Canada's total territory, but only has about 100,000 people) and
has endeavored to make concern for the Arctic a prime feature of
the Conservative political brand. The culmination of that effort
was the release of the government's "Northern Strategy" in the
summer of 2009. Thus far, the government's ardor for the "North"
has translated into only a modest array of actions that have an
impact on American and other foreign interests: most significantly
an extension of the reach of its pollution protection rules in the
Arctic, from 100 nautical miles (nm) to 200 nm. To make further
progress in its efforts to "enhance Arctic sovereignty," the
government likely needs to leverage the stature, policies, and
resources of the United States, the one Arctic neighbor whose
national interests are most closely aligned with, Canada's.
Numerous observers of the Canadian political scene caution,
however, that while Arctic sovereignty is tried and tested as an
election issue, the promises made are seldom implemented. End
summary.
Conservatives make concern for "The North" part of their political
brand...and it works
¶2. (U) Beginning in mid-2004, the then-minority government of
Liberal Prime Minister Paul Martin commenced a rhetorical battle
with Denmark over a two-decade old claim to uninhabited Hans Island
between Greenland and Ellesmere Island, which culminated in July
2005 when the Canadian Defence Minister and several soldiers
actually landed on Hans Island and hoisted the maple leaf flag
(they also left a bottle of Canadian whisky). Danish-Canadian
tensions were reduced to a simmer by a September 2005 joint
statement, but the government's Arctic sovereignty statements of
2004 and the Canadian military efforts the following summer set the
stage for Conservative Party leader Stephen Harper to make the
North an election issue in the campaign that began in December
¶2005. "The single most important duty of the federal government is
to protect and defend our national sovereignty," he declared in
stump speeches invoking "...new and disturbing reports [sic] of
American nuclear submarines passing though Canadian waters without
obtaining the permission of -- or even notifying -- the Canadian
government." Candidate Harper's Arctic plan focused on the
construction and deployment of three new armed heavy icebreaking
ships, an Arctic Ocean sensor system, as well as the eventual
construction of a deepwater port in Nunavut to guard the Arctic
waters. The message seemed to resonate with the electorate; the
Conservatives formed the new government in 2006, but failed to win
a majority.
¶3. (U) Once elected, Harper hit the ground running with frosty
rhetoric; on January 26, 2006 Harper (who was still only Prime
Minister - designate) used his first post-election press conference
to respond to the United States Ambassador's restatement the prior
day of the longstanding U.S. position on the Northwest passage.
Harper firmly declared that "...the Canadian government will defend
our sovereignty, ...and it is the Canadian people we get our
mandate from, not the Ambassador of the United States."
¶4. (C/NF) PM Harper made a focus on the North a prime feature of
the Conservative political brand again in the October 2008 general
election. In addition, in his government's annual budgets and in
public announcements, he has continued to accentuate the focus on
the North. For example, in its budgets over the past four years,
the government announced a series of significant Arctic
expenditures, including: C$750 million for a new Polar-class ice
breaker to replace its sole heavy icebreaker, (which is 40 years
old and scheduled to be decommissioned in 2017); millions for
mapping of the Extended Continental Shelf and mapping of northern
natural resources; and, most recently, a C$250 million dollar
economic development agency focused on Canada north of the 60th
parallel. The culmination of the branding effort was the release of
the government's "Northern Strategy" in the summer of 2009. A
consolidation of previous Conservative policy pronouncements, the
Strategy largely reflects long-standing Canadian Arctic shibboleths
(Enhance Arctic Sovereignty; Promote Social and Economic
Development; Protect the Environment; Improve Northern Governance
and give greater authority to Northerners) to which previous
Canadian governments have periodically given voice. The persistent
high public profile which this government has accorded "Northern
Issues" and the Arctic is, however, unprecedented and reflects the
PM's views that "the North has never been more important to our
country" - although one could perhaps paraphrase to state "the
North has never been more important to our Party." (Comment: The
opposition parties have not developed policies on Canada's role in
the Arctic beyond generalities, defaulting "ownership" of a
robust, rhetorical northern policy to the Conservatives that
dovetails with party's broader priorities of rebuilding the
Canadian Forces and enhancing Canada's international role". End
Comment).
¶5. (U) To underscore his government's commitment to the Arctic, the
PM has also visited the Arctic every summer since taking office
while holding occasional cabinet meetings in the territorial
capitals. In the latest example: as the G8 host in 2010, Canada
has chosen to convene the G8 Finance Ministers' meeting in Iqaluit
on Baffin Island...in February.
¶6. (C/NF) The government has also taken steps to amend a few key
pieces of legislation to enhance its ability to control shipping in
the North. In 2009, new authorities came into force that extended
Canada's regulations for pollution violations all the way to the
200 nautical mile EEZ limit. A second proposal that would mandate
all ships destined for Canada's Arctic waters to report to Canadian
authorities has not yet been finalized in regulation. To date, the
changes to the shipping rules are the only efforts that have had an
impact on American and other foreign interests. The results of
Canada's submission of a claim in 2013 for an Extended Continental
Shelf under the United Nations Convention on the Law Of the Sea
(UNCLOS) will also have an impact on Canada's neighbors. But, at
this juncture, for Canada to advance its "sovereignty" interests
there is a need to focus on bilateral and multilateral partnerships
with its Arctic neighbors.
Canada's Arctic Foreign Policy
¶7. (U) According to Foreign Minister Cannon, "our foreign policy is
a reflection of our domestic policy." To that end, "through the
international dimension of our Northern Strategy-our Arctic foreign
policy-we will protect our environmental heritage, promote economic
and social development, exercise our sovereignty in this vital
region and encourage more effective international governance".
Moreover, in March 2009, when FM Cannon unveiled Canada's Arctic
Foreign Policy in the Yukon, he declared that his "utmost priority"
is to further strengthen Canada's bilateral engagement with Arctic
states. He stated that "The United States is our premier partner in
the Arctic," that "we have many shared interests and common
purposes-in environmental stewardship, search and rescue, safety,
security and sustainable resource development," and that he was
looking forward to a more enhanced level of cooperation on Arctic
issues with the United States. He noted that this would include
exploring "ways to pursue a common agenda," starting in 2013, as
Canada and subsequently the United States chair the Arctic Council.
He delivered the same speech in April 2009 at the Center for
Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC, further
adding in his speech that he had discussed opportunities for
enhanced cooperation on shared Arctic interests when he had met
with Secretary Clinton earlier that day. In November 2009, during a
speech in Toronto to the Economic Club of Canada, the Foreign
Minister exclaimed that "Canada, with allies like the United
States, is well-placed to take a leadership position in the face of
the new challenges and opportunities in the Arctic." Interestingly,
while taking questions after the speech, FM Cannon refused to be
drawn into any discussion of difference with the United States over
the Northwest Passage even when pressed, and instead chose to
emphasize Arctic cooperation with the U.S.
¶8. (C/NF) Comment: Canada places great import on its Arctic
partnership with the United States and at this juncture the
Conservatives in particular see special value in enhancing that
partnership. Not only is that partnership materially significant
for Canada, which benefits greatly from American resources invested
in Arctic science and in defense infrastructure , but also Canada
has much to gain from leveraging the stature and standing of the
United States. Among the Arctic coastal states (and perhaps among
all countries) Canada and the United States typically have the most
closely aligned policy interests and generally share a common
viewpoint on international law and common objectives in
multilateral fora (such as the Arctic Council). From Canada's point
of view, if the two countries can find bilateral common-ground on
Arctic issues, the chance for Canadian success is much greater than
going it alone against the interests of other countries or groups
of countries.
¶9. (C/NF) Comment Continued: Numerous observers of the Canadian
political scene caution, however, that while Arctic sovereignty is
tried and tested as an election issue, the promises made are seldom
implemented (the armed ice-breakers and ocean sensors that
candidate Harper promised in the 2006 election have been forgotten
; what will be the fate of the three-quarter billion dollar
ice-breaker?). That the PM's public stance on the Arctic may not
reflect his private, perhaps more pragmatic, priorities, however,
was evident in the fact that during several hours together with
Ambassador Jacobson on January 7 and 8, which featured long and
wide-ranging conversations, the PM did not once mention the Arctic.
End Comment.
JACOBSON