

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 03OTTAWA2225, Canadian Invasive Species Plan due soon, USG and
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03OTTAWA2225.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
03OTTAWA2225 | 2003-08-06 16:14 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 OTTAWA 002225
SIPDIS
STATE FOR OES/ENV (ROSE), OES/ETC (ROTH), OES/OA
(HEIDELBERG), WHA/CAN (NELSON, WHEELER)
EPA FOR OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS (CHRISTICH)
INTERIOR FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (GLOMAN)
INTERIOR FOR NATIONAL INVASIVE SPECIES COUNCIL STAFF
(WILLIAMS)
INTERIOR (A. GORDON BROWN)
COMMERCE (DEAN WILKINSON)
STATE PLEASE PASS ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
AGRICULTURE (REBECCA BECH)
WHITE HOUSE FOR COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV TBIO ETRD CA
SUBJECT: Canadian Invasive Species Plan due soon, USG and
GoC need to meet now
Ref: (A) Ottawa 00481 Notal
--------------------------
Summary and Action Request
--------------------------
¶1. Officials of Environment Canada and the Department of
Fisheries and Oceans expect a public rollout of a draft
framework for managing Alien Invasive Species in autumn
¶2003. There may not be much meat on the bones of the draft
strategy, and a year of consultations and further drafting
will be required before the framework takes its final form.
On the other hand, existing law and regulation does provide
significant scope for action and the GoC intends to focus on
achieving near-term results within the existing statutory
and funding framework. These GoC interlocutors have set a
high priority on establishing a shared "binational" set of
priorities for dealing with Alien Invasive Species and would
like to meet with American counterparts very soon (perhaps
as early as late August), to begin to establish a strategy
that will work for both governments. Post strongly supports
this initiative and recommends that Washington agencies
enter into a more intensive dialogue as soon as possible.
Beginning that dialogue now will allow the U.S. to influence
development of the Canadian draft framework and lay a
foundation for more detailed work once pending legislation
in the U.S has been adopted. End Summary and Action
Request.
----------
Background
----------
¶2. The GoC made a pledge in 1992, when it signed the United
Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), to prevent
and/or control Alien Invasive Species. The problem,
however, according to the Commissioner of Environment and
Sustainable Development (part of the GoC Auditor General's
organization), is that this commitment (and the 1995
Canadian Biodiversity Strategy it precipitated) have not
triggered any concrete action. In an October 2002 report,
the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable
Development characterized federal government efforts to deal
with the Alien Invasive Species (AIS) issue as being in
disarray, with "no clear understanding of who will do what
to respond" and noting that "no federal department sees the
big picture or has overarching authority to ensure that
federal priorities are established and action taken."
Nevertheless, Canada indicated in its second national report
to the CBD in 2002, that "federal, provincial and
territorial governments have agreed that the development of
a Canadian strategy to address alien invasive species is a
national priority."
¶3. Embassy ESTH Counselor, ESTH Specialist and Intern met
with representatives from Environment Canada and the
Department of Fisheries and Oceans on July 30th to discuss
progress in the Canadian effort to develop a national
strategy, to discuss the extent of bilateral cooperation on
AIS and to elicit GoC views on how to foster further
integration of Canada-U.S. efforts, including their views of
a potential reference to the IJC.
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
-----
EC and DFO Officials acknowledge slow start - but plan is
coming
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
-----
¶4. Emboffs met Robert Mclean, Acting Director General,
Conservation Strategies Directorate, Environment Canada
along with George Enei, Director, Conservation Priorities
and Planning Branch, and Mark Hovorka, Scientific Advisor in
that Branch. Sylvain Paradis, Director of the DFO
Environmental Science Group, represented the Department of
Fisheries and Oceans.
¶5. McLean, who led the discussion for the Canadian side,
acknowledged the long lag between the commitment made in the
CBD and mid-September 2003 when a targeted action plan, the
"National Invasive Species Management and Policy Framework"
as it is tentatively referred to, will be outlined for
federal, provincial and territorial ministers. McLean
anticipates that the Framework will be unveiled in a public
rollout as a "White Paper" (i.e., draft public policy) in
autumn 2003 shortly after the briefing to ministers. This
will be followed by a period of seeking stakeholder and
broad public comment and a final, official, Policy Framework
in place around autumn 2004.
¶6. McLean underscored that although the Framework is still
under construction, the priorities contained in the nascent
plan reflect the views of the provincial, territorial and
federal ministers responsible for the environment, for
forests and for fisheries. Obtaining consensus for the
priorities was facilitated by the fact that the provincial
and federal ministers in each of the three domains meet
annually in Coordinating Councils, and since 2001 the three
Councils have held a joint meeting on biodiversity. The one
major set of ministries that has been missing from the joint
meetings on biodiversity has been Agriculture. McLean did
not elaborate on why the Agriculture ministries were not
part of that process (there is indeed a Joint federal-
provincial Council of Ministers of Agriculture who clearly
could have participated in the biodiversity meetings), but
indicated they are a major player that needs to be engaged
in the national framework process. Even at this late stage,
however, there is much work still to be done. For example,
it is not clear to GoC officials, what form the political
governance structure will take, it may or may not emulate
the U.S. National Invasive Species Council.
¶7. In this same vein, the GoC has not yet done an
assessment on the need for new statutory instruments.
McLean noted that there are a number of existing statutes
and regulations, both federal and provincial that can be
employed to address the AIS threat (to be reported septel).
Moreover, he contends that in order to demonstrate to the
senior political and bureaucratic leaders in the Prime
Minister's Office and Privy Council Office that the
objectives of the Invasive Species Framework are credible
and "deliverable" it will be imperative that GoC agencies
make progress employing the existing mandates and agency
programs to address high profile invasive species problems
(such as Asian Carp) in the near term.
¶8. McLean also noted that in addition to the ministerial
level engagement, federal-provincial working level groups
are engaged in the development of the plan. Given the
division of powers in Canada between the federal and
provincial orders of government (to be reported septel),
Mclean highlighted the high degree of challenge in producing
a coordinated set of actions with respect to AIS. As just
one example, provinces are responsible for management of
fish stocks whereas the federal government has jurisdiction
in regulating and managing fish habitat. Thus banning
possession of live Asian Carp (an emerging federal
objective) will require enacting provincial law and
regulation.
¶9. Our GoC interlocutors emphasized that the message from
the provinces is that the federal government should focus on
policies for prevention rather than dealing with remediation
and already established AIS. For many established invasive
pest species (excluding perhaps Sea Lampreys in the Great
Lakes, for which a comprehensive plan and funding has been
in place for decades) our GoC interlocutors noted that there
is no clear road ahead and that it will probably be the
provinces that have to lead this effort. Comment: The
provinces will, however, be looking to the federal
government to help fund their efforts at remediation. End
Comment.
¶10. McLean commented that if GoC agencies can produce
tangible success in the near-term on AIS, the issue is well-
situated to gain a higher profile in the GoC as a new Prime
Minister takes over the government in February 2004, perhaps
even earlier. And an election is widely expected in the
spring. Comment: It can be safely assumed that there will
be many competing priorities for the attention, and the
budget, of the new government. Without a formal policy
statement of the priorities of Paul Martin, widely
anticipated to be the next PM, it is difficult to judge
whether McLean's hope is justified. Indeed, a review of
Martin's public statements over the past year has not
revealed any reference to Alien Invasive Species. End
Comment.
--------------------------------------------- -----------
Bilateral cooperation requires much greater coordination
--------------------------------------------- -----------
¶11. McLean noted that there has been long-standing
bilateral cooperation on AIS, for example with respect to
the Sea Lamprey problem in the Great lakes, and more
generally, on AIS important to agriculture and forestry.
But cooperation has typically been ad hoc, species and
project specific, agency-to-agency and regional in focus
rather than as a coordinated overall approach guided by a
shared bilateral set of priorities. McLean and Enei noted
the desire of the EC Assistant Deputy Minister (Karen Brown)
responsible for AIS that those senior officials responsible
for AIS policy should meet very soon to begin working on a
set of shared bi-national priorities. The outcomes of this
meeting (or series of meetings) could feed into our
bilateral consultations on a reference to the IJC, should
the U.S and Canadian governments deem that mandate
desirable.
¶12. With respect to the expected IJC reference, GoC
officials emphasize that clear and tangible goals for the
IJC effort are required. In their opinion "new money" for
the IJC effort will not be allocated from the Treasury,
rather an IJC effort will likely be funded from existing
departmental budgets. Without a clear, tangible and "value-
added" goal, GoC agencies will resist ponying up the cash.
¶13. Mclean agreed with ESTH Counselor's suggestion that it
would be beneficial to have a catalogue/inventory of
existing collaborative efforts on AIS, but the GoC
representatives admitted that they have not compiled any
such inventory. They indicated it is something they intend
to construct, but gave no timeline. Comment: Post strongly
believes that an inventory of areas in which the two
governments already collaborate would be very valuable and
would appreciate receiving such information if it already
exists with Washington agencies. End comment.
---------------------------------------------
IJC Views provide their comment of GoC effort
---------------------------------------------
¶14. ESTH staff sought the views of the International Joint
Commission to provide an assessment of developments in
Canada. James Houston, Environmental Advisor at the Ottawa
office of the International Joint Commission (IJC) told
Emboffs that political awareness of the Invasive Species
issue has grown markedly in the past 18 to 24 months; he
pointed to the role that Canadian IJC Co-Chair Herb Gray has
played since coming to the IJC in January 2002 to champion
GoC engagement in addressing the problem. Houston
reiterated that the key problem in Canada has been lack of
accountability. Over the past decade GoC ministries have
simply passed the buck on AIS, he emphasized that a critical
component therefore of any new framework is to have a strong
governance system. Houston pointed to the management
structure described by the New Zealand Biodiversity Strategy
of February 2000 as an example of what might work, but he
noted that Chairman Gray is an advocate of the American NISC
governance model.
---------------------------
Comment and Action requests
---------------------------
¶15. The key message provided by our GoC interlocutors is
that they view it as essential for USG and GoC senior
officials responsible for AIS to meet very soon to begin
crafting a shared set of priorities. More generally a
bilateral meeting will also help our GoC interlocutors to
flesh out the draft Framework and give us a chance to
influence its development. The Autumn 2003 timeline for
unveiling the draft Framework (as a policy White Paper) to
the public for input and comment may well be met, but it
remains to be seen how substantive it may actually be.
According to McLean (1) the federal and provincial
agriculture ministries have not been engaged in the
development of the draft plan; (2) no assessment has yet
been done to determine whether any new statutory instruments
are required; and (3) the governance structure to oversee
the implementation of the plan, a critical element, is still
undetermined. Our GoC interlocutors did not explicitly
state this, but one presumes they believe that the public
consultation process and final drafting scheduled for the
period Autumn 2003 to Autumn 2004 will fill in these
details.
¶16. ACTION REQUEST: We understand that McLean or Enei
expects very soon to arrange with Lori Williams, Executive
Director of the National Invasive Species Council setting a
meeting of GoC and USG policy officials with AIS
responsibilities. We understand that the target date for
the meeting is late August or early September. Post would
appreciate details of the meeting agenda and USG
participants once those are available. The embassy intends
to be fully engaged on this issue and wishes to contribute
to the bilateral effort. In that vein, we believe that an
inventory of collaboration between U.S and Canada Ian
agencies would be useful and request that the department
provide such information if it is available.
Kelly