

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08TOKYO727, CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE IN
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08TOKYO727.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08TOKYO727 | 2008-03-18 23:00 | 2011-05-04 00:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO8661
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #0727/01 0782300
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 182300Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2650
INFO RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA PRIORITY 6705
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA PRIORITY 9097
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE PRIORITY 0378
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO PRIORITY 7309
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 TOKYO 000727
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR S/CT ROBERTSON, EEB, EAP/J WEBSTER
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/17/2018
TAGS: ASEC ECON ETTC JA PGOV PREL PTER
SUBJECT: CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE IN
JAPAN
REF: STATE 6461
Classified By: Ambassador JTSCHIEFFER for reasons 1.4(b/d).
¶1. (SBU) Summary: Japan has faced a variety of natural
disasters and other historical challenges to its critical
infrastructure and systems. As a result, the country has
developed preparations and capacity for responding to known
threats, such as earthquakes, and has a record of willingness
to share this information with others to help develop their
abilities to prepare for and cope with disasters.
Compartmentalization and risk aversion within the
bureaucracy, however, could increase Japan,s vulnerability
to threats for which it is less prepared, such as a pandemic.
Given the integration of the U.S. and Japanese economies as
well as Japan,s status as the world's second largest
economy, the potential consequences of a catastrophic event
in Japan could be major. It would be useful to develop
further bilateral exchanges on the subject of critical
infrastructure and its protection and to include Japan in any
work on critical infrastructure and emergency response. End
Summary.
Introduction
------------
¶2. (SBU) Japan and the U.S. are the world's two largest
economies, closely linked to each other and to other major
world economies. A catastrophic event or major
infrastructure failure in Japan, therefore, would negatively
affect the U.S., the rest of Asia, and the global economy as
well.
¶3. (SBU) The infrastructure and systems that most directly
connect the U.S. and Japan include information and
communications, transportation and distribution, and
financial systems. Japan's industrial and R&D
establishments, some of which have become sole providers for
extremely specialized high-tech equipment or technologies,
mean Japanese inputs are valuable, and sometimes essential,
to numerous U.S. industries.
Information and Communications Systems
--------------------------------------
¶4. (SBU) A failure of information and communications systems
would have an immediate impact. These systems are connected
globally in real time. A major failure could affect
transportation, energy, defense, financial, health care, and
other critical industries and services.
¶5. (SBU) The greatest risk to such systems seems to be
virtual, from cyber-warfare or cyber-crime. Such attacks are
regarded as easier and could have a wider potential impact
than attacks on physical infrastructure. Attacks could also
be launched against system infrastructure, content or
operations on networks, or against individuals or commerce
active over such networks. Cyber-security threats seem an
inescapable part of life on the Internet and the capabilities
of potential attackers and those administering networks are
already advanced and growing continually.
¶6. (SBU) Still, physical damage to global information
networks remains a threat, particularly involving
trans-oceanic cables or remote infrastructure. Given the
redundancy and ability to reroute signals over networks,
however, such an incident might have less severe impact on
the U.S, although the time and cost of repairing a
transpacific cable could be substantial.
¶7. (SBU) Japan is pursuing policies to address risks and
improve its cyber-security profile. Japan has both public
and private sector entities focused on cyber-security in an
effort coordinated by the National Information Security
Council (NISC), a cabinet office, and the Japan Computer
Emergency Response Team/Coordination Center (CERT/CC). The
country is currently in the second year of its Secure Japan
three year plan.
¶8. (SBU) The U.S.-Japan Cyber-Security Dialogue, lead by DHS
and NISC, also continues to share information and explore
areas of cooperation. One example is participation by
Japanese observers in the March 2008 CyberStorm II exercise.
These efforts should improve international coordination of
planning and cyber-security response capabilities,
demonstrate best practices and refine national programs.
TOKYO 00000727 002 OF 003
Aviation and Maritime Ports
---------------------------
¶9. (U) Transportation links between Japan and the U.S. too
are critical to global as well as bilateral commerce.
Two-way merchandise trade in 2006 between the two countries
equaled USD 207.7 billion. On average, USD 569 million worth
of goods passed through Japanese ports every day on their way
to or from the U.S.
¶10. (U) Japan's three largest airports with traffic to the
U.S. are Narita (Tokyo-Yokohama), Kansai (Osaka-Kobe), and
Chubu (Nagoya). In addition to serving passengers to both
countries, they are vital hubs for trans-pacific passenger
traffic. In terms of passenger traffic to the U.S., 50
flights and 13,000 passengers per day arrive in the United
States from Narita (second only to London Heathrow).
Disruption of these airports, therefore, would have serious
consequences for the U.S. and Asia.
¶11. (U) Cargo traffic through these airports is also a vital
economic link. In 2007, roughly USD 20 billion of shipments,
or almost 13 percent by value of all Japanese exports to the
U.S., went as air cargo out of Narita airport. By value,
more trade passes through this airport than through any other
port in Japan. Narita handles roughly twice the value of
global two-way trade as the port of Tokyo. Narita handles 72
percent more than Nagoya port, which processes the most trade
by value of any Japanese maritime port.
¶12. (U) Japan's maritime ports are also vital economic links.
Japan's five largest maritime ports are Tokyo, Yokohama,
Nagoya, Osaka and Kobe. In 2006, they processed over one
million containers (1.43 million TEU) to/from the U.S.
¶13. (SBU) Japan has established agencies and policies
providing for port security, both infrastructure protection
and border controls, consistent with international standards,
such as the International Ship and Port Facility Security
Code. Operational U.S. agencies such as Customs and Border
Protection, the Federal Aviation Administration and the U.S.
Coast Guard have ongoing dialogue and information sharing
programs with Japanese counterparts. Other examples of
specific initiatives to strengthen the security of ports and
shipping include the Megaport program. Japan looks to launch
a Megaports pilot project in Yokohama and is working with DHS
and DOE on plans.
Financial Market Infrastructure
-------------------------------
¶14. (SBU) Financial markets are a clear example of other
infrastructures that closely connect the two economies. A
failure in Japan's financial system infrastructure, or the
interruption of financial transaction clearing, would have
serious repercussions for the U.S. and the rest of the world.
¶15. (U) Establishment, maintenance, and protection of
financial system infrastructure have been left to the private
sector, under the supervision of the financial services
regulator, the Financial Services Agency, and the Bank of
Japan, which is responsible for the payments system.
Disasters and Threats in Japan
------------------------------
¶16. (U) Japan's has a history of catastrophic natural
disasters. Historically, the greatest natural threats were
earthquakes and volcanoes, storms, and fires. The great
Kanto (Tokyo) earthquake of 1923 was of magnitude 7.9 and
killed roughly 105,000 people; the Hanshin (Kobe) earthquake
of 1995 was magnitude 7.3 and killed 6,437. Between 1996 and
2005, 20.8 percent of the world's earthquakes of 6.0 or
greater occurred in Japan. Seven percent of the world's
active volcanoes are located in Japan and Mt. Fuji, although
it last erupted in 1707-08, is still active and a threat to
the greater Tokyo area with its 30 million inhabitants.
Storms are another problem, with the 1959 Ise Bay Typhoon
taking 5,098 lives. There is a clear downward trend in the
numbers of lives lost in disasters in Japan, however.
Factors contributing to this development include improved
technology and engineering, stronger safety standards, and
better emergency preparations and response.
¶17. (SBU) Japan faces other types of threats, with pandemics
TOKYO 00000727 003 OF 003
one of the most serious. The SARS and Avian Influenza did
not greatly affect Japan, but the country is potentially
vulnerable to a pandemic. In addition, Japan has also
experienced terrorism, for example, with the taking of
hostages at the Japanese Embassy in Peru and the Sarin gas
attack in the Tokyo subway system. The 1995 Sarin attack
killed 12, injured 1,034, and undermined public confidence in
the safety of Japan's mass transit system.
¶18. (SBU) Japan relies heavily on nuclear power for roughly
30 percent of its electricity needs. While Japan has never
had an attack on a nuclear facility, several Japanese
facilities have experienced safety incidents, some resulting
in fatalities and prolonged shutdowns. In the most recent
case, the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant located in
Niigata Prefecture and the world's largest in terms of
electrical generating capacity, remains off line following a
July 2007 earthquake. Also during summer 2007, the Hokkaido
Electric Power Company was criticized for failing to prevent
suspected arson at a reactor construction site at its Tomari
nuclear power plant.
¶19. (SBU) Japan's political leaders and public profess
concern about the country's continued dependence on imported
food as well as on imported oil. Some Japanese still recall
post-war shortages. However, as Japan is less than 40
percent self-sufficient in food production, despite concerns
about food security, Japan's only practical resource security
will come from stable and reliable flows.
Emergency Preparedness and Response
-----------------------------------
¶20. (SBU) The GOJ has taken steps to prepare for such
threats. Japan has established legislative and
organizational frameworks for disaster management and
emergency response. The GOJ has developed response
capabilities at the national, regional, and local levels as
well. A Minister of State for Disaster Management oversees
disaster management efforts, coordinated by the Cabinet
Office, and involving 23 government entities and 63 public
and private corporations. The legal basis for Japan's
Disaster Management System were set out in 1961 by the
Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act.
¶21. (SBU) Japanese bureaucracy and planning can be
inflexible, with the result that Japan may be still
vulnerable to threats that are less well understood, or which
require different sorts of preparation. A pandemic or a
major cyber attack would require different responses from
those appropriate to an earthquake, and could catch both the
GOJ and private sector unprepared. Such a situation in turn
could result in prolonged loss of critical systems or
services.
¶22. (C) Comment: Highly advanced technology and its
application for industrial and consumer use has long been a
key factor in Japan's economic growth and a reality for
leading U.S. and other companies. Disruption in the supply
lines would have significant consequences. Likewise, Japan's
role as an international financial services and a
communications/transportation hub would mean an attack or
other serious development that disrupted these activities
here, would likely seriously affect the U.S. and other
allies. As the U.S. proceeds with the effort described in
ref, it may be useful to consider reaching out to Japan to
discuss steps we can take to prevent a possible disruption or
to mitigate the negative effects should one occur. End
Comment.
SCHIEFFER