

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON88, NEW ZEALAND TO REDRAFT SECTION 92A OF NEW
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON88.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON88 | 2009-04-03 03:31 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO8351
PP RUEHNZ
DE RUEHWL #0088/01 0930331
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 030331Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5818
INFO RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 5483
RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND PRIORITY 1943
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY PRIORITY 0822
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY 0294
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000088
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE PASS TO USPTO, U.S COPYRIGHT OFFICE, USTR JARED
RAGLAND, COMMERCE FOR ITA/MAC/OIPR, STATE FOR EAP/ANP,
EEB/TPP/IPE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD KIPR NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND TO REDRAFT SECTION 92A OF NEW
COPYRIGHT LAW
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: On March 23, New Zealand's Minister of
Commerce Simon Power announced that the GNZ would suspend
section 92A of the new copyright law, which would have
created new regulations for terminating internet accounts of
repeat copyright infringers. Negotiators for both the
intellectual property rights (IPR) industry and the
Telecommunications Carrier Forum (TCF - the association of
internet service providers (ISPs)) were surprised; they had
felt they were close to finalizing a voluntary code of
practice which would have served as the regulatory foundation
for enforcing this section of the law. Minister Power
decided that the proposed code might not be workable on a
voluntary basis, and therefore reasserted the government's
authority to redraft section 92A. In doing so he reaffirmed
the GNZ's commitment to the importance of IPR protection to
NZ's creative industries. It now will be crucial to monitor
the progress of GNZ redrafting to ensure it succeeds in a
timely manner. End Summary.
Background
----------
¶2. (SBU) The Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act 2008
was originally scheduled to go into full force on February
28, 2009 but in the weeks leading up to the deadline, public
interest groups raised a chorus of concerns claiming that the
law's requirement to terminate internet subscribers who
allegedly "pirated" digital copyrighted materials over the
internet would infringe on due process, freedom of speech and
the public's right to access information. The negative
publicity led to demonstrations staged in front of
Parliament, organized by a group called the Creative Freedom
Foundation.
¶3. (SBU) The publicity drew the attention of some minority
party politicians who hoped to ride a new populist wave. The
United Future Party's leader Peter Dunne wanted Parliament to
strike section 92A entirely from the new copyright bill
through an arcane legal maneuver which would have required
the Governor General to quash the provision. ACT Party
leader Rodney Hyde also joined in the chorus calling for
repeal of the section while he castigated the previous Labour
government for its "poor" drafting of the Bill. Both United
and ACT are current members of the National led coalition
government.
¶4. (SBU) In reaction, a core panel was formed within the
Cabinet consisting of the Commerce Minister Simon Power,
Communications/IT Minister Steven Joyce, Broadcasting
Minister Jonathan Coleman and Attorney General Chris
Finlayson to develop a game plan and dampen the negative
publicity. Meanwhile, Dunne had been asked by Simon Power to
consider reformulating the provision in language more
acceptable to the ISPs instead of stripping the law entirely
of its content.
¶5. (SBU) The response developed by the four ministers and
announced by Simon Power as lead was to suspend section 92A
for 30 days during which time the IP rights holders would
hammer out a code of practice with the Telecommunication
Carriers Forum (TCF - industry association representing NZ's
major ISPs - Telecom, Telstra, Vodafone, Kordia and Callplus)
which would serve as the regulatory foundation for section
92A. The law would then go into force at the end of March
and after 90 days it would be reviewed as to its appropriate
application.
Original Text of Section 92A
----------------------------
¶6. (U) Section 92A reads as follows:
Internet service providers (ISP) must have policy for
terminating accounts of repeat infringers
1) An ISP must adopt and reasonably implement a policy that
provides for termination, in appropriate circumstances, of
the account with that ISP of a repeat infringer.
2) In subsection (1), repeat infringer means a person who
repeatedly infringes the copyright in a work by using one (1)
or more of the Internet services of the ISP to do a
restricted act without the consent of the copyright owner.
WELLINGTON 00000088 002 OF 003
Telstra Pulls Out of Negotiations
---------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) Telstra, one of the major New Zealand ISPs,
signaled during the week of March 9 that it was no longer
willing to participate in the negotiations between the
copyright industry and the TCF on development of the code of
practice that would have served as the regulatory foundation
for enforcing section 92A. Press reported rumors that
Telstra's decision to cease cooperation may have originated
from the company's CEO Sol Trujillo who has been reported as
an opponent of similar legislation in Australia. The TCF
tried to continue working on the draft code with the
remaining NZ ISPs (Telecom, Vodafone, Kordia and Callplus).
However, in accordance with the TCF's by laws, unless there
is unanimous agreement among all members of the
telecommunications forum then the code of practice would not
be binding but merely voluntary. After Telstra's opting-out,
the remaining stakeholders were unable to come to full
agreement on a useable code of practice. They remained
deadlocked on two "minor" items: how to deal with fees (costs
imposed on rights holder for submitting termination requests)
and the length of time before termination (time between
notice of infraction and cancellation of internet service -
one versus two month lead-time).
GNZ Decides to Rewrite Section 92A
----------------------------------
¶8. (SBU) Minister Power, realizing that the proposed code of
practice could only be voluntary and not applicable to the
second largest ISP in NZ (Telstra) along with the end of
March deadline rapidly approaching, suspended the
negotiations and reasserted the government's authority to
redraft section 92A. In his announcement, Power stressed
that section 92A traverses an important issue in copyright
law reform and reaffirmed the GNZ's stance that internet
piracy is very costly to NZ's creative industries and needs
to be addressed.
¶9. (SBU) On March 23, Minister Power, issued a press release
after the weekly Cabinet meeting announcing that the GNZ
would suspend section 92A as of March 31. (Note: all other
provisions of the new copyright law are in force as of March
31 except but for section 92A. End note). The Government's
action came as a surprise because up to the time of the
Minister's announcement negotiators for both the IPR industry
and the Telecommunications Carrier Forum had said they were
close to finalizing a "voluntary" code of practice.
IPR Industry Expresses Disappointment
-------------------------------------
¶10. (SBU) On March 26, Charge' met with Frank Rittman, Vice
President and General Counsel for Asia Pacific Division of
the Motion Picture Association (MPA) and Tony Eaton, Director
of New Zealand Federation Against Copyright Theft (NZFACT) to
ascertain the IPR industry's reaction to suspension of
section 92A of the NZ Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment
Act 2008 and possible next steps by government, copyright
holders and internet service
providers.
¶11. (SBU) Rittman and Eaton had met earlier with the IP
division of Ministry of Economic Development (MED) charged
with the redraft of Section 92A. MED officials' chief
concern was that MED did not yet have clear instructions from
its political leadership, primarily from the Minister of
Commerce, as to timeline and process. Rittman felt that the
sense of urgency among the IP lawyers in MED was relatively
low and believed that a redraft was unlikely any time sooner
than late December 2009. As to the redrafting process, he
felt that the public's input would be sought - most likely to
diffuse the earlier criticism of lack of transparency in the
original formulation of 92A. Rittman said that the drafters
would need to satisfactorily address four main points:
- Resolve satisfactorily the question of indemnification
(i.e., who bears costs of improper termination).
- Agree to definition of what constitutes an ISP.
WELLINGTON 00000088 003 OF 003
- Ensure that process for notification and termination be
"timely" (IP industry asking for one month between final
warning and termination of internet service while ISPs
seeking two month lead-time).
- Determine who bears processing costs (there is the cost of
processing the notifications to customers for alleged misuse
estimated at approx NZ$100 per notification - will it be
shared or carried by ISPs).
Next Steps
----------
¶12. (SBU) Throughout the final stages of the law's (near)
implementation, the Embassy continued to met with IPR
stakeholders and GNZ officials to ascertain progress and
encourage resolution. To determine how a "workable" section
92A provision can be secured, Econoff met with Rory McLeod,
Director at Ministry of Economic Development (MED) with
responsibility for IPR within GNZ along with Paula Wilson,
Deputy Director for Trade Negotiations at MFAT, and was given
assurance that the government remains committed to redrafting
Section 92A.
¶13. (SBU) Embassy will continue to stress with GNZ officials
the need for a shorter rather than protracted timeline for
the redraft and will ascertain the details of a notice and
comment period for public submissions once released by GNZ.
During this hiatus we've proposed holding DVC(s) between NZ
and U.S. interlocutors to possibly help with drafting and as
a public diplomacy tool to dispel public misperceptions about
proper role of IPR protection. U.S. agencies have the
benefit of 10 years worth of experience in enforcing the U.S.
Digital Millennium Copyright Act that may serve useful to New
Zealand officials in their effort to implement section 92A.
KEEGAN