

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09MONTREAL115, RESULTS OF ICAO'S TWENTIETH AVIATION SECURITY PANEL MEETING
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09MONTREAL115.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09MONTREAL115 | 2009-04-07 18:47 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Consulate Montreal |
INFO LOG-00 AF-00 AID-00 A-00 ACQ-00 CEA-01 CIAE-00
COME-00 CTME-00 INL-00 DODE-00 DOEE-00 ITCE-00 WHA-00
DS-00 EAP-00 DHSE-00 EXME-00 EUR-00 OIGO-00 E-00
FBIE-00 UTED-00 VCI-00 FRB-00 H-00 TEDE-00 INR-00
IO-00 LAB-01 L-00 MOFM-00 MOF-00 VCIE-00 NEA-00
DCP-00 NSAE-00 ISN-00 NSCE-00 OIC-00 OIG-00 OMB-00
NIMA-00 EPAU-00 MCC-00 PER-00 GIWI-00 SCT-00 ISNE-00
DOHS-00 SP-00 SSO-00 SS-00 STR-00 TRSE-00 NCTC-00
ASDS-00 FMP-00 CBP-00 BBG-00 EPAE-00 IIP-00 SCRS-00
DSCC-00 PRM-00 DRL-00 G-00 SCA-00 CARC-00 SAS-00
FA-00 SWCI-00 /002W
------------------4F491D 071843Z /38
R 071847Z APR 09
FM AMCONSUL MONTREAL
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 0207
DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC
TSA HQ WASHINGTON DC
INFO DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON DC
FAA NATIONAL HQ WASHINGTON DC
USEU BRUSSELS 0015
AMEMBASSY LONDON
AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
AMEMBASSY MEXICO
AMEMBASSY DAKAR
AMEMBASSY ROME
AMEMBASSY CANBERRA
AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI
AMEMBASSY TOKYO
AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES
AMEMBASSY RIYADH
AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE
AMEMBASSY BERLIN
AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
AMEMBASSY DOHA
AMCONSUL MONTREAL
UNCLAS MONTREAL 000115
PASS TO ALL DHS/FAA REPRESENTATIVES
DOT FOR OST
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR ECON PREL PTER ICAO XX
SUBJECT: RESULTS OF ICAO'S TWENTIETH AVIATION SECURITY PANEL MEETING
¶1. Summary. Transportation Security Administration officials
led the U.S. delegation to the International Civil Aviation
Organization's (ICAO) Twentieth Aviation Security Panel of
Experts (AVSECP) meeting and presented two U.S. working paper
proposals and an information paper on the supply chain approach
to air cargo security, introducing unpredictability into an
aviation security regime, as well as a report from the first
meeting of a U.S.-chaired New and Emerging Threats Working
Group. The U.S. delegation gained wide support among panel
members for U.S. proposals, notably for the concepts of supply
chain security and unpredictability as a supplemental tool in
enhancing baseline security in the airport environment. End
Summary.
BACKGROUND
¶2. The AVSECP, an expert advisory body established by ICAO, is
responsible for developing new aviation security Standards and
Recommended Practices (SARPs), among other duties. The Panel
submits recommendations the ICAO Council, which may adopt and
incorporate the SARPs into Security Annex 17 to the Convention
on International Civil Aviation (Chicago Convention) governing
international aviation security. The Twentieth Meeting of the
Aviation Security Panel (AVSECP/20) was held in Montreal from 30
March - 3 April 2009. Cindy Farkus, the Transportation Security
Administration's Assistant Administrator for the Office of
Global Strategies, led the U.S. delegation.
U.S. PROPOSALS
¶3. The United States received universal support and positive
feedback on its two working papers and one information paper.
All will be referred to the ICAO Council for further
consideration and approval. The U.S. papers can be accessed on
ICAO's secure website.
¶4. Report of the New and Emerging Threats Working Group.
This paper detailed the process, discussion, and outcomes of the
first meeting of ICAO's New and Emerging Threats Working Group
(NETWG) held from 6 to 8 January 2009 in Washington, D.C.,
including experts from eight countries and ICAO staff.
Discussions were focused on the use of risk assessment and
management models for the process of analyzing the threats (both
nature and likelihood) and civil aviation's vulnerabilities to
those threats, i.e. the risk as a means of identifying gaps in
the mitigating measures in Annex 17 -- Security. The group also
discussed in detail a consolidated list of threats passed, on a
restricted basis, to the working group by the G8 Roma-Lyon
Transportation Security Subgroup. Through small, focused
discussion groups, the NETWG reached consensus on four
categories of threats: artfully concealed weapons; person-borne
improvised explosive devices; vehicle-borne improvised
explosives devices; and air cargo. In sum, the group made
significant progress in identifying potential gaps in existing
measures and providing recommendations for consideration by the
panel.
¶5. The NETWG report group was passed to the Amendment 12
working group, which is tasked with identifying and proposing
language for new Standards and Recommended Practices to be
included in Amendment 12 to Annex 17 -- Security. The panel
agreed to allow a change in the name of the group in order to
address the notion of `evolving' threats. The next NETWG
meeting is tentatively scheduled for the first week in June 2009
and will be hosted by the co-chair, the United Kingdom. The
report generated positive comments regarding the importance of a
proactive approach to threats rather than a reactive one and
several states mentioned their concern over cyber-threats. The
UK will ask its own experts and those from a recently convened
EC workshop on cyber-threats (nfi) to make a presentation during
the next working group meeting.
¶6. Air Cargo Supply Chain Management. This paper outlined the
elements and benefits of supply chain screening and "chain of
custody" requirements for securing air cargo, which emphasizes
effective security management of the entire air cargo supply
chain. The supply chain approach to air cargo security has been
implemented successfully in the Republic of Ireland and the
United Kingdom (UK); is under consideration by Canada and the
European Commission as a way of increasing air cargo security;
and is similar to an initiative undertaken by the International
Air Transport Association, referred to as "Secure Freight." The
United States has developed a system, modeled after those in
Ireland and the UK, referred to as the Certified Cargo Screening
Program, to provide a mechanism by which industry may achieve
100 percent screening without impeding the flow of commerce.
Benefits include decreased air carrier delays and expedited
supply chain flow; the ability to build bulk configurations that
can be tendered without re-screening; the ability to ship
certain cargo types without potential invasive screening later
in the chain; and the ability to maintain in-house packaging
integrity.
¶7. The air cargo working paper received positive responses from
Australia, the UK, Mexico, Singapore, Switzerland, Saudi Arabia,
Italy, Senegal, Japan, Argentina, and India. Nearly all
expressed support for supply chain security principles and
highlighted similar efforts in their own countries. The UK
noted that this was one area in aviation security where the
international community was implementing measures "ahead of the
game" instead of reacting to events. Cautionary messages from
panel members centered on discouraging "unilateral measures" and
imposing 100 percent physical screening requirements. The panel
then agreed to add elements of the U.S. paper to guidance
material, referred the matter to the Amendment 12 working group
to explore ways to incorporate supply chain elements to SARPs,
and urged the creation of a joint Secretariat study group on the
facilitation/aviation security aspects of the supply chain. The
final panel report further reflected its endorsement of supply
chain security management and that the concept should be
"considered for inclusion in Annex 17."
¶8. Building Unpredictability into an Aviation Security Regime.
This information paper offered the premise that civil aviation
faces an adaptive and motivated enemy whose choice of target and
attack method depends significantly on the perceived and actual
vulnerability of the security system. Terrorists can analyze a
static system easily by identifying where, how, and when
resources are used, thereby allowing them a greater opportunity
to identify weaknesses, circumvent the system, and exploit
vulnerabilities. By implementing various security measures
within existing security layers in an unpredictable and random
approach, terrorists' plans can be frustrated, attacks may be
deterred, and countermeasures can be deployed flexibly and
quickly in response to emerging threats.
¶9. Qatar, Mexico, Canada, Switzerland, Brazil, Germany,
Singapore and Saudi Arabia intervened to express their
appreciation for the working paper and the concept of
introducing unpredictability into an aviation security regime.
Mexico said that it was a valuable tool for states with limited
resources. Saudi Arabia suggested it be addressed as a
"strategic objective" during a possible future international
aviation conference and Canada asked that the Amendment 12
working group consider adding language in Annex 17 that reflects
the principle and benefits of the approach. Some debate
centered around cautioning against reducing baseline security in
order to add in unpredictable elements and around the idea of
maintaining passenger comfort by retaining common practices from
one destination to another. In the end, the chair summarized by
saying that unpredictability was a key element in the evolution
from excelling at screening to developing innovative and new
measures to thwart terrorists.
OTHER KEY ISSUES
¶10. Other objectives met at this meeting included:
a) Encouraging threat-related information sharing among
Contracting States;
b) Supporting a proposal to establish a Technological Working
Group to advise the Panel on security-related technologies for
liquids, aerosols and gels and other threats;
c) Urging the creation of a temporary working group to
develop a revised security plan of action that will take
global security in a new and focused direction;
d) Urging greater transparency in the ICAO Universal Security
Audit Process (USAP);
f) Encouraging an exchange of information between Donor
States in the provision of assistance to developing
nations to avoid duplication of effort and wasted resources;
g) Monitoring discussions related to a possible requirement
for 100 percent staff screening and;
h) Conducting bilateral meetings with member states and
participating in sidebar discussions.
¶11. Coordinating Assistance to States (Partner/Donor Meeting-).
ICAO staff provided an overview of a new ICAO coordinated
development database of assistance programs offered worldwide
and especially in Africa. ICAO's Implementation Support and
Development Branch encouraged States to send in data regarding
training and assistance programs and nominations for subject
matter experts to conduct training worldwide. ICAO previewed
its new "Go Team" concept which mirrors TSA's Aviation Security
Sustainable International Standards Teams program (ASSIST),
which sends a group of veteran security experts to collaborate
with local security officials to address several security needs
at one time (following an initial security assessment of
training needs, equipment, current aviation programs, and
aviation security legislation). The teams work to build aviation
security capacity, practices, and sustainable institutions
through local alliances.
CONCLUSION
¶12. The U.S. delegation achieved its goals of gaining
international support for its three paper proposals. The
U.S. looks forward to future collaborative and proactive work
with the aviation security panel, its working groups and
contracting states, to identify new, evolving and emerging
threats, share threat information, increase transparency in the
universal security audit program, and strengthen Annex 17 and
guidance material to include the concepts of supply chain
security in air cargo and unpredictability, among other
objectives.
¶13. We greatly appreciate Posts' assistance in this effort and
their ongoing support for international civil aviation matters.
Please direct questions or requests for additional information
pertaining to this cable to Jillene.MacCreery@dhs.gov (tel.: +1
571-227-2244).
FAUX-GABLE MCCLENNY