

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09STATE35745, A/S SHANNON'S MEETINGS WITH ECUADORIAN OFFICIALS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09STATE35745.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09STATE35745 | 2009-04-10 19:05 | 2011-04-07 07:30 | SECRET | Secretary of State |
Appears in these articles: http://www.eluniverso.com/2011/04/07/1/1355/cable-201915.html |
O R 101905Z APR 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO AMEMBASSY QUITO IMMEDIATE
INFO AMEMBASSY ASUNCION
AMEMBASSY BOGOTA
AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES
AMEMBASSY CARACAS
AMEMBASSY LA PAZ
AMEMBASSY LIMA
AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO
AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO
AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL
NSC WASHINGTON DC 0000
S E C R E T STATE 035745
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/10/2019
TAGS: PREL PINR SNAR EC
SUBJECT: A/S SHANNON'S MEETINGS WITH ECUADORIAN OFFICIALS
TO DISCUSS ECUADORIAN ACCUSATIONS OF U.S. INTERFERENCE
REF: A. QUITO 217
¶B. QUITO 160
C...
id: 201915
date: 4/10/2009 19:05
refid: 09STATE35745
origin: Secretary of State
classification: SECRET
destination: 09QUITO145|09QUITO153|09QUITO160|09QUITO217
header:
O R 101905Z APR 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO AMEMBASSY QUITO IMMEDIATE
INFO AMEMBASSY ASUNCION
AMEMBASSY BOGOTA
AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES
AMEMBASSY CARACAS
AMEMBASSY LA PAZ
AMEMBASSY LIMA
AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO
AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO
AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL
NSC WASHINGTON DC 0000
----------------- header ends ----------------
S E C R E T STATE 035745
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/10/2019
TAGS: PREL PINR SNAR EC
SUBJECT: A/S SHANNON'S MEETINGS WITH ECUADORIAN OFFICIALS
TO DISCUSS ECUADORIAN ACCUSATIONS OF U.S. INTERFERENCE
REF: A. QUITO 217
¶B. QUITO 160
¶C. QUITO 153
¶D. QUITO 145
Classified By: A/S SHANNON, REASONS 1.4 (B) and (D).
¶1. Summary. (S/NF) On April 1, A/S Shannon met Ecuadorian
Justice Minister Jalkh, Vice Foreign Minister Pozo, and other
GOE officials to discuss GOE accusations that an embassy
official had taken actions to destabilize the government of
Ecuador. Making clear the GOE's desire to work with the USG
on security matters, Jalkh alleged inappropriate contacts
between the Embassy officers and Ecuadorian "bad actors"
known to have a criminal history. A/S Shannon responded that
we would investigate the allegations, reaffirmed the U.S.
desire to work constructively with Ecuador, and stressed the
importance of working with Ambassador Hodges on this matter
going forward. At the conclusion of the meeting, Pozo handed
A/S Shannon a printed presentation that summarized the GOE's
allegations.
¶2. (S/NF) Summary (Continued). On April 3, A/S Shannon and
DAS McMullen had a follow up meeting with Minister Jalkh and
Ambassador Gallegos. A/S Shannon informed Minister Jalkh
that Embassy Quito had conducted a preliminary investigation
of the allegations made by the GOE. He said that the USG had
not found inappropriate behavior on the part of the embassy
offer. He added that the USG was concerned that a third
party might have been involved in this approach to the
embassy, and he requested a cooperative investigation between
the embassy and the GOE to get to the bottom of the matter.
He noted that the United States has no desire to destabilize
Ecuador and seeks cooperation. However, he cautioned that
any further expulsions of embassy staff would be very
problematic. Both Jalkh and A/S Shannon closed by stressing
the need to get beyond current difficulties and reestablish
broad cooperation. End Summary.
April 1 Meeting
---------------
¶3. (S/NF) A/S Shannon met with Ecuador's Minister of Justice,
Gustavo Jalkh; MFA Vice Minister, Lautaro Pozo; Permanent
Representative to the UN, Maria Espinosa; Permanent
Representative to the OAS, Efren Cocios; Chief of Staff of
for VM Pozo, Efrain Baus; and Ambassador to the United
States, Luis Gallegos, on April 1 to discuss GOE allegations
of an effort by an Embassy Quito officer to destabilize the
government of Ecuador. WHA/DAS, WHA/AND Officer Director,
INL/LP Office Director, and the Ecuador Desk Officer also
participated. Jalkh opened by noting that he had only been
in his current position for six weeks. He reviewed the tough
work involved in reforming Ecuador's national police, and
noted that security on the northern border of Ecuador is a
key priority. He stressed that social development in Ecuador
is crucial to the task of protecting both human rights and
security.
¶4. (S/NF) Jalkh next stated that the GOE had found some
issues that needed to be addressed to strengthen the
bilateral relationship with the United States: "Cooperation
is our goal; we wish to work together on all fronts through
time, government to government." Referring to the recent
expulsions of two U.S. officials (reftels), Jalkh asserted
that the GOE could not have responded any other way. He
added that the GOE hoped that such difficulties would not
happen again and that the GOE needs improved communication
with the United States.
¶5. (S/NF) Jalkh moved on to the specific point of the
meeting. According to Jalkh, the GOE had evidence of an
inappropriate meeting at Embassy Quito between an Embassy
officer and "bad actors" in Ecuador. Jalkh further asserted
that the emboff offered benefits to these individuals in
exchange for speaking ill of the GOE regarding narcotics
matters. Jalkh underlined that his goal was to address this
matter so broader cooperation could take place. He said, "We
need to talk of this. We want to work with you on this. We
believe in human rights and democratic controls. This is a
new type of government." He added that the GOE had massive
problems on its northern border and would like to cooperate
with the United States on the refugee problem. He also said
that Ecuador does not get the recognition it deserves for its
efforts on its northern border. Summing up, Jalkh said, "We
want to turn the page to our mutual concerns, but we have to
get over this issue (of alleged Embassy meddling)."
¶6. (S/NF) VM Pozo next spoke. According to Pozo, "We know
this is not the policy of the United States. This is a clear
conspiracy to destabilize the government of Ecuador. There
were phone calls to set up the meeting. This involves a well
known criminal. It is very upsetting." Pozo said the GOE
did not meet with the embassy regarding this matter,
ostensibly in an effort to reduce tensions. Commenting on
the GOE's recent expulsions of Embassy officials from
Ecuador, Pozo said: "We know this (the allegedly nefarious
actions of the expelled emboffs) is not the policy of the
Department of State. These were personal actions by these
individuals." He said the GOE wants this matter
investigated. Pozo said that President Correa told Pozo and
Jalkh to travel to the United States to raise these issues
and claimed that the GOE had a real desire to cooperate with
the United States.
¶7. (S/NF) A/S Shannon responded by thanking the GOE officials
for the information they had provided. He said the USG would
investigate the situation, and told the officials that the
United States had no interest in interfering in domestic
matters, and was particularly sensitive to such concerns
during an election campaign. Shannon noted the efforts of
the Correa administration to reconfigure the government and
create the possibility of stability. He added that a stable
Ecuador with political and economic development is
important--especially in an integrating and globalizing
world: "We share an interest in improving dialogue,
identifying common interests, and working together." He
noted that problems in bilateral relations between Ecuador
and the United States would cause damage in the region.
Pointing out that both countries are in a political
transition, A/S Shannon said that the Obama administration is
seeking to "reimagine relations in the hemisphere."
¶8. (S/NF) Jalkh agreed, emphasizing the need to work on
common interests. He said the GOE was serious about
democratic controls; about the fight against illicit
narcotics; and about creating a new ethos and legal framework
for the police. Jalkh highlighted GOE plans to increase its
police presence on the northern border. He said the GOE
would measure its effectiveness along the northern border,
"not by resources added, but if we take down gangs." Pozo
echoed Jalkh's comments. He said that Ecuador had a
significant state presence on the northern border, with
11,000 troops (or one quarter of all Ecuadorian troops). He
added that the GOE is worried about demobilized Colombians
creating additional problems and said, "We are victims."
Ambassador Espinosa briefly mentioned that Ecuador had an
exemplary record with respect to refugees.
¶9. (S/NF) A/S Shannon replied that the United States
understands the problems Ecuador faces along its northern
border, including the situation regarding refugees and the
need for investment. He pointed out that there are more
Colombian refugees in the region than there are refugees in
Darfur and that the lack of awareness in the hemisphere
regarding the problem was the fault of the inter-American
system, which has failed to capture and articulate the needs
of refugees in the region.
¶10. (S/NF) Moving back to the bilateral relationship, A/S
Shannon asserted the need to reconfigure our diplomatic
relations, and emphasized the confidence and respect the
State Department and the White House had for Ambassador
Hodges. He also emphasized that occasional points of
disagreement between the United States and Ecuador did not
represent the totality of relations between the two
countries. Ambassador Gallegos responded to this final point
by stating that "we need to denarcoticize relations" and
focus on other items, such as economic, social, security, and
development matters. He commented that the bilateral
dialogue presented a chance to expand relations and that new
items should be added to the dialogue's agenda. Gallegos
noted that relations between the United States and Ecuador
needed to be transparent and respectful.
¶11. (S/NF) At different moments during the discussion, both
Jalkh and Pozo raised the matter of vetted units in Ecuador
(reftels). Jalkh stressed that the GOE had three main
requirements for future cooperation: first, any agreements
must be in writing; second, all agreements must be
coordinated through the GOE's MFA; and third, the vetting
process must be collaborative. He said that the GOE
recognized that cooperating on intelligence matters was
different, and that the GOE would try to accommodate the USG
on this. He also mentioned, "It is not good to have only one
good unit" to combat narcotics trafficking in Ecuador. Pozo
stressed that vetted units must be under the control of the
civilian authority.
¶12. (S/NF) As the meeting ended, Minister Pozo handed A/S
Shannon two documents providing details of illegal armed
groups along Ecuador's northern border and the GOE's military
position along the northern border. He also provided a
printed PowerPoint presentation that outlined the GOE's
specific assertions regarding the March 24 meeting of the
Ecuadorian "bad actors" and embassy officers.
April 3 Follow Up Meeting
--------------------------
¶13. (S/NF) A/S Shannon and WHA DAS McMullen met with Minister
Jalkh and Ambassador Gallegos on April 3 for a follow up
discussion. A/S Shannon told Jalkh that Embassy Quito had
completed a preliminary inquiry into the March 24 meeting,
when the allegedly "inappropriate meeting" took place. He
said that what the Embassy had discovered caused us concern,
though our concerns were different from those expressed by
the GOE at the April 1 meeting. A/S Shannon said that the
USG was concerned that a third party might have been involved
in this approach to the Embassy. He said the USG considered
it important for the GOE to work cooperatively with our
embassy to investigate what happened; he asked the GOE to
share any additional information -- such as tapes of
telephone conversations between Munoz and Rodas following the
meeting at the embassy. He emphasized to Jalkh that the
embassy official had done nothing inappropriate by simply
meeting with Ecuadorians who had claimed to have information
on the FARC.
¶14. (S/NF) A/S Shannon reiterated that the USG had no reason
to try to destabilize the Correa government. He said that,
given Ecuador's recent turbulent history, the USG was hoping
that Correa would bring stability, democracy and development
to Ecuador. He added that the United States would like to
get past this incident as soon as possible and reestablish
close cooperation in areas of mutual interest.
¶15. (S/NF) Minister Jalkh responded that the GOE appreciated
the quick response and committed the GOE to working with
Embassy Quito to follow up. He pledged to set up a meeting
with Ambassador Hodges on April 6 to discuss next steps.
Jalkh added that the GOE also wanted to turn the page and
move on -- and collaborate closely on a broad set of issues,
not just security. He said the GOE appreciated the U.S.
decision not to retaliate for Ecuador's expulsion of two
Embassy officers. While the GOE believed that those Embassy
officers had acted inappropriately, he acknowledged that the
USG had the sovereign right to retaliate, but had chosen not
to do so. In an implied reference to the Summit of the
Americas, Jalkh mentioned that it would be helpful if both
countries' leaders could meet and get to know one another.
¶16. (S/NF) A/S Shannon again stated that the United States
wanted to find points of convergence with Ecuador and was not
seeking confrontation. He warned, however, that any further
expulsions by the GOE would be very problematic. He closed
by stressing the importance of both countries moving beyond
this rough patch in relations; he hoped that the April 6
meeting with Ambassador Hodges and her team would be a first
step in that direction.
CLINTON
=======================CABLE ENDS============================