

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09QUITO736, ECUADOR SECURITY MINISTER EXPLAINS "PERCEPTIONS"
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09QUITO736.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09QUITO736 | 2009-08-17 16:15 | 2011-04-09 07:30 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Quito |
Appears in these articles: http://www.eluniverso.com/2011/04/09/1/1355/cable-221121.html |
VZCZCXYZ0009
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHQT #0736/01 2291615
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 171615Z AUG 09
FM AMEMBASSY QUITO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0763
INFO RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION 0325
RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA 8325
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 4252
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES 0825
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 3681
RUEHGE/AMEMBASSY GEORGETOWN 0224
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ AUG LIMA 3366
RUEHMN/AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO 2251
RUEHPO/AMEMBASSY PARAMARIBO 0071
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 3105
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL 4567
RHMFISS/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
C O N F I D E N T I A L QUITO 000736
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: TWENTY YEARS
TAGS: PREL MARR MCAP MOPS EC CO XM XR
SUBJECT: ECUADOR SECURITY MINISTER EXPLAINS "PERCEPTIONS"
OF U.S.-COLOMBIA MILITARY COOPERATION
REF: A. 09 QUITO 715 ...
id: 221121
date: 8/17/2009 16:15
refid: 09QUITO736
origin: Embassy Quito
classification: CONFIDENTIAL
destination: 09QUITO570|09QUITO661|09QUITO704|09QUITO715|09STATE47202|09STATE82581
header:
VZCZCXYZ0009
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHQT #0736/01 2291615
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 171615Z AUG 09
FM AMEMBASSY QUITO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0763
INFO RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION 0325
RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA 8325
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 4252
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES 0825
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 3681
RUEHGE/AMEMBASSY GEORGETOWN 0224
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ AUG LIMA 3366
RUEHMN/AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO 2251
RUEHPO/AMEMBASSY PARAMARIBO 0071
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 3105
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL 4567
RHMFISS/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
----------------- header ends ----------------
C O N F I D E N T I A L QUITO 000736
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: TWENTY YEARS
TAGS: PREL MARR MCAP MOPS EC CO XM XR
SUBJECT: ECUADOR SECURITY MINISTER EXPLAINS "PERCEPTIONS"
OF U.S.-COLOMBIA MILITARY COOPERATION
REF: A. 09 QUITO 715
¶B. 09 STATE 82581
¶C. 09 QUITO 704
¶D. 09 QUITO 661
¶E. 09 QUITO 570
¶F. 09 STATE 47202
Classified By: Ambassador Heather M. Hodges for Reasons 1.4 (b&d)
¶1. (C) SUMMARY: During his visit to attend President
Correa's August 10 inauguration ceremony, DAS Christopher
McMullen met with Security Minister Miguel Carvajal and MFA
Under Secretary Jorge Orbe regarding the ongoing negotiation
of a U.S.-Colombia Defense Cooperation Agreement. McMullen
provided assurances that the DCA did not represent a threat
to Ecuador or any other country in the region. Likewise, the
proposed agreement did not expand the U.S. military presence
in Colombia; rather, it simply sought to formalize existing
ad hoc arrangements that have provided U.S. access to
Colombian bases for a number of years. Carvajal expressed
Ecuador's concern about Colombia's intentions in the region
and rejected the suggestion that GOE rhetoric on the issue
was anti-U.S. As a practical matter, McMullen suggested
that, rather than communicating via the media, the U.S. and
Ecuadorian embassies, as well as the U.S.-Ecuador Bilateral
Dialogue, were more appropriate channels for discussion of
issues such as the Colombia DCA. END SUMMARY.
¶2. (SBU) On August 7, the MFA accepted WHA Deputy Assistant
Secretary Christopher McMullen's offer to discuss ongoing
negotiations between the U.S.and Colombia regarding a Defense
Cooperation Agreement. Although the MFA told us the meeting
would be with Under Secretary of Bilateral Affairs Jorge
Orbe, upon arrival at the MFA the Coordinating Minister of
Internal and External Security, Miguel Carvajal, and two of
his under secretaries unexpectedly joined the meeting and led
the discussion on behalf of the GOE. DCM and PolOff, as well
as MFA North America desk officer, also attended the meeting.
NO INTEREST IN ESTABLISHING U.S. BASES
--------------------------------------
¶3. (C) In explaining the Colombia DCA negotiations, DAS
McMullen made the following points:
-- the U.S. has no plans to establish U.S. military bases in
Colombia;
-- the DCA negotiations aim at formalizing existing ad hoc
arrangements that have provided access to Colombian bases on
an informal basis for many years;
-- the U.S. seeks access primarily to three air bases,
including Palanquero, Apiai, and Barranquilla (although the
latter largely for emergency or logistical purposes);
-- the local Colombian commanders would retain control of
these bases;
-- the U.S. military presence in Colombia has been
diminishing in recent years and will continue to do so as the
U.S. transfers key counter-narcotics and security programs to
Colombian control;
-- the U.S. goal is to return eventually to pre-Plan Colombia
levels of security assistance, a process that reflects
Colombia,s increasing capabilities to combat the FARC and
other illegal armed groups;
-- the purpose of this DCA is to deepen and modernize
existing security cooperation, most of which date back to the
Cold War era and are no longer relevant to the current
realities and challenges that we face, particularly
transnational threats such as narco-terrorism in Colombia.
TRANSFERING CN AND SECURITY PROGRAMS; REDUCING US MILITARY
FOOTPRINT
-------------------------------------
------------------------------
¶4. (C) DAS McMullen explained that the U.S. has already begun
transferring the control of security and counter-narcotics
programs to the GOC, which has demonstrated the capability to
sustain these programs. He noted that USG assistance to
Colombia would eventually return to what it had been prior to
Plan Colombia. He said that with a gradual reduction of U.S.
security assistance over the coming years, the U.S. would
likely reduce the number of military personnel in Colombia.
He pointed out that while the U.S. congressional limit on the
number of military personnel in Colombia was 800, an average
of less than 300 had been present in Colombia the last
several years.
COLOMBIAN BASES ARE NOT A REPLACEMENT FOR MANTA FOL
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶5. (C) McMullen pointed out that U.S. discussions with
Colombia regarding formalizing access to Colombian bases had
begun well before the GOE's announcement that it would not
renew the agreement for U.S. access to the Forward Operating
Location (FOL) in Manta, Ecuador. He added that the access
to Colombian bases would not replace the capabilities that
were lost with the closure of the Manta FOL. He noted that
the Colombian bases were in the interior of the country, far
from the Eastern Pacific where maritime narco-trafficking was
taking place.
ECUADOR HAS ITS DOUBTS
----------------------
¶6. (C) Minister Carvajal interjected that Ecuador had a
"distinct perception" regarding the U.S. military presence in
Colombia, and that others in the region shared Ecuador's
concern. He said the announcement that the U.S. would use
Colombian bases came as a big surprise, just as the
reactivation of the Fourth Fleet for use in counternarcotics
had been a surprise. McMullen countered that the Fourth
Fleet's mission was not counternarcotics; it was primarily
humanitarian in nature.
¶7. (C) Carvajal pressed on, stating that Ecuador seriously
doubted Colombia's commitment to combating the FARC and
narco-trafficking. He stated that Ecuador's key issue was
that Colombia had not provided a guarantee that there would
be no more attacks on Ecuadorian soil; if it did so, all else
would be negotiable. He then cited several reasons why the
GOE mistrusts and doubts Colombia's intentions:
-- March 1, 2008, Colombian bombing of a FARC camp in
Ecuadorian territory.
-- Excessive investment by the USG in Colombia via Plan
Colombia and Plan Patriota.
-- Imbalance in the size of Colombia's military compared to
other countries in the region.
-- Lack of reduction in the production of cocaine in
Colombia. Carvajal asserted that despite USG assistance,
Colombia still had 90 million hectares of coca, whereas
Ecuador had none.
-- Years of damage to licit crops in Ecuador caused by aerial
eradication along the border, with no compensation to
Ecuadorians affected by the spraying.
-- Minimal presence of Colombian security forces along
Colombia's border with Ecuador. Carvajal stated that
Colombia had only 3,000 troops and five bases (two permanent
and three mobile) along its border, whereas Ecuador had 7,000
military and 3,000 police personnel and four times the number
of bases.
-- Colombia's ongoing media campaign to discredit Ecuador.
Carvajal cited the Mono Jojoy video (Ref D) as an example,
calling the video a fake.
-- Lack of Colombian assistance in assisting approximately
135,000 Colombian refugees currently in Ecuador.
DIFFERENT PERCEPTIONS OF THREAT
-------------------------------
¶8. (C) Responding to Carvajal's question on why Colombia did
not station more of its troops along its border with Ecuador,
McMullen said that it would be best to ask Colombia directly
regarding its strategy, and expressed hope that Ecuador would
improve its relations with Colombia. McMullen added that
Colombia was engaged in a difficult conflict with the FARC,
ELN and other armed groups, and had suffered greatly from
their brutal tactics. In recent years, the GOC has made
impressive progress in the fight against these illegal armed
groups. He then drew a contrast with Venezuela, noting that
the GOV had increased its military strength even though it
did not face a similar threat. Carvajal quickly responded
that Venezuela's threat was Colombia.
CARVAJAL DOWNPLAYS HARSH ANTI-U.S. RHETORIC
-------------------------------------------
¶9. (C) McMullen noted that Ecuador had been a good partner in
the fight against narcotrafficking, and said he had been
surprised by President Correa and other GOE officials' harsh
rhetoric calling the U.S. military presence in Colombia a
"provocation." He observed that the accusations were even
less understandable considering the Ambassador's August 4
assurances to Foreign Minister Falconi (Ref C), as well as
President Obama's recent remarks stating clearly that there
would be no U.S. bases in Colombia, that the U.S. would not
control Colombian bases, and that the purpose of our presence
in Colombia was to continue the fight against
narcotrafficking. Carvajal denied that the GOE had used any
inappropriate rhetoric, justifying his assessment by saying
that the GOE had not used derogatory terms such as "yankee"
when referring to President Obama.
FINDING A COMMON WAY FORWARD
----------------------------
¶10. (C) Focusing the conversation back on practical matters,
DAS McMullen stressed that Ecuador and the U.S. were partners
in counternarcotics cooperation. He pointed out that
although the Manta FOL agreement had not been renewed, the
U.S. was hopeful regarding Ecuador's ongoing review of the
"Gas and Go" proposal, which might allow U.S. planes to fly
anti-drug missions out of Guayaquil's airport (Refs E and F).
Returning to the DCA issue, McMullen explained that the USG
had not consulted with Ecuador or other countries because it
was bilateral in nature; the negotiations with Colombia were
ongoing, so we could not predict the final form of the
agreement; and the DCA does not break new ground, it would
merely formalize existing cooperation. He said that had the
GOE asked for information regarding the issue, prior to
making public accusations, the USG would have responded
immediately (as was done at the request of the Brazilian
Embassy in Washington). He suggested that Embassy Quito and
Ecuador's Embassy in Washington were the appropriate channels
for requesting this type of information. MFA Under Secretary
Orbe suggested the OAS as a forum to discuss the issue.
McMullen countered that the U.S.-Ecuador Bilateral Dialogue
would be a more appropriate forum for discussion of Ecuador's
security concerns vis-a-vis U.S. security cooperation with
Colombia.
COMMENT
-------
¶11. (C) This meeting was useful in airing the frank views of
both sides regarding U.S.-Colombian negotiations on the DCA.
While Carvajal recognized the importance of sharing
information and perspectives, he was mostly interested in
communicating the GOE's concerns to the USG. It is clear
that the GOE's mistrust of Colombia will continue to affect
its views of U.S.-Colombian security cooperation. In the
absence of any formal bilateral mechanism between Ecuador and
Colombia, and in response to Foreign Minister Falconi's
suggestion to the Ambassador (Ref C), the U.S. might be able
to play a useful role in facilitating communication between
the GOE and Colombia, although the personal bad blood between
Correa and Uribe will ultimately limit the extent to which
the U.S. can resolve this vexing bilateral dispute.
¶12. (U) This cable was cleared by DAS McMullen.
HODGES
=======================CABLE ENDS============================