

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08USNATO251, JULY EAPC: OSCE BRIEF, UNSCR 1325, DEFENSE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08USNATO251.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08USNATO251 | 2008-07-17 10:03 | 2011-04-24 00:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Mission USNATO |
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHNO #0251/01 1991003
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 171003Z JUL 08
FM USMISSION USNATO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2078
INFO RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KYIV IMMEDIATE 0132
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW IMMEDIATE 6010
RUEHVJ/AMEMBASSY SARAJEVO IMMEDIATE 0144
RUEHSQ/AMEMBASSY SKOPJE IMMEDIATE 3399
RUEHSI/AMEMBASSY TBILISI IMMEDIATE 5625
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEHNO/USDELMC BRUSSELS BE IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/USNMR SHAPE BE IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L USNATO 000251
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/09/2018
TAGS: PREL MARR NATO AORC AM AJ RU GG SW FI AF
SUBJECT: JULY EAPC: OSCE BRIEF, UNSCR 1325, DEFENSE
EDUCATION AND TRAINING
Classified By: Charge d'Affaires Richard G. Olson, Jr.
for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
¶1. (C) Summary: During their July 9 meeting, EuroAtlantic
Partnership Council (EAPC) Ambassadors exchanged views with
OSCE Secretary General Marc Perrin de Brichambaut, covering
issues such as Afghanistan, Kosovo, and Georgia. The EAPC
also received a briefing on defense education and training
from Partnership for Peace Consortium Chairman Henri Bigo and
discussed next steps in implementing UNSCR 1325 on women,
peace and security. In a separate meeting with the Charge, de
Brichambaut said the Russians had specifically asked him to
pass on their offer to support the U.S. desire for increased
OSCE cooperation on Afghanistan, in exchange for unspecified
concessions in other areas. End summary.
OSCE Secretary General's Presentation
-------------------------------------
¶2. (C) OSCE SYG Marc Perrin de Brichambaut told the EAPC that
NATO and the OSCE have a shared interest in promoting
stability. He said the last 12 months have tested the
commitment of nations to the OSCE principles at the most
basic level. After highlighting the challenges facing the
OSCE in election monitoring and assisting with the unresolved
conflicts in Georgia, de Brichambaut shared his fear that the
"deeply rooted impasse" in Kosovo may have entered a long
period of ambiguity. De Brichambaut expressed his belief that
international action is vital to protect human rights and
fundamental freedoms in the Balkans. He also observed that
OSCE action in Afghanistan and Central Asia was a part of the
long term effort to consolidate security and democracy in
these areas. De Brichambaut said OSCE effectiveness in
Afghanistan will depend on the support of international
organizations, other key countries, and Russia. De
Brichambaut said the impasse over Russian suspension of the
Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty concerns the entire OCSE
community due to the importance of military transparency.
Finally de Brichambaut asserted that the OSCE itself can only
be effective insofar as the member states use it as a
toolbox. He argued that political-military considerations
cannot exist independently from economic and human-dimension
concerns. In conclusion he said he looked forward to closer
work with NATO, including through staff-to-staff
consultations.
¶3. (C) In response, Finland said that enhancing OSCE-NATO
cooperation is a priority for its chairmanship of the OSCE.
Austria, Spain, Germany and France asked what the OSCE could
do to enhance its role in Afghanistan, with Spain and Germany
specifically mentioning elections as an area to focus on.
Spain, Greece, and Hungary asked about OSCE activity in
Kosovo, while the Serbian representative took this
opportunity to express his thanks for a statement in 2007 by
de Brichambaut that Kosovo could become a precedent. Serbia
also expressed "profound gratitude" to the countries present
that had not recognized Kosovo. Russia said the OSCE should
play an adequate role in international security, and hoped
nations could work together to creatively solve the CFE
impasse.
¶4. (C) Georgia expressed gratitude to the OSCE SYG, saying
the OSCE had been helpful in the separatist conflicts. The
Czech Republic supported this view and called for more OSCE,
EU, and UN attention in the South Caucasus. Russia expressed
concern about escalating tensions in Georgia adding that
Moscow could not agree with the suggestion that peacekeeping
formats for the separatist conflicts be changed.
¶5. (C) Armenia spoke of the OSCE as a key asset for conflict
resolution, prompting Azerbaijan to assert its commitment to
democracy, human, rights and the rule of law. Azerbaijan and
Armenia traded well-known positions on the situation in
Nagorno Karabakh, causing other delegations to roll their
eyes at the proceedings.
¶6. (C) U.S. Charge Olson deployed guidance praising the work
of OSCE in promoting human rights and democratic elections in
Europe and Eurasia. Olson highlighted the work of ODIHR,
which, he said, is at the forefront of promoting, protecting
and defending shared values that are critical to democracy
and democratic development. He called on the OSCE to play a
proactive and creative role in working on the frozen
conflicts. The U.S. also strongly supported the OSCE's
engagement in Afghanistan, asserting that activities must
take place inside of Afghanistan to have any real impact.
OSCE Secretary General's Bilat with the U.S. Charge
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶7. (C) In a separate meeting with Charge Olson, de
Brichambaut suggested that the Russians were not yet in
support of the OSCE proposals for Afghanistan. He said the
Russians had directly asked him why "the U.S. does not ask us
directly to support their proposal" and that they had added
that if the U.S. were to do so "we will see what we might ask
of them." He said Russia had asked him to relay that message
directly to the U.S. He did not know what specifically they
might be seeking from the U.S., but was clear that the
Russians see the U.S. as the demandeur on this program.
¶8. (C) Charge Olson replied that the U.S. tries to avoid
linked deals of the sort the Russians seem to be seeking.
While the Russians repeatedly try to initiate negotiations of
this kind, the U.S. usually resists their efforts to make a
grand bargain and prefers to stick to the specifics of an
issue. The SYG noted that the Russians should ideally
realize that secure borders for Afghanistan were in Russia's
interest too. The SYG's Chief of Staff Paul Fritch remarked
that involvement of the CSTO was the most obvious demand the
Russians would seek. The Charge responded that such a request
would likely be a bridge too far in a NATO context.
¶9. (C) Olson stressed the importance of the OSCE program
operating inside Afghanistan. De Brichambaut replied that he
would have to take things one step at a time -- once the
program is approved the OSCE can look at other options, such
as increasing the presence inside Afghanistan and training
the Afghan customs force. Reacting to the comments of
several nations in the EAPC meeting that the OSCE should play
a role in assisting with the set up of the Afghan elections,
the SYG said he would discuss the possibility with the head
of ODHIR and thought it would be politically and financially
feasible.
¶10. (C) The SYG said he has been telling the Russians that,
if they were serious about Medvedev's proposal for a European
Security Treaty, they would need to define it more and decide
in which venue it will be discussed. The SYG said he had
discussed with Russian Deputy FM Grushko the possibility of
using OSCE Vienna as the venue. Grushko had told him Russia
felt it could not wait until the next U.S. administration to
begin talks on this issue.
¶11. (C) The SYG asked about the July 18 Friends of Kosovo
meeting in Brussels, saying he had been hearing from many
participants that they are not expecting much to come out of
it. Olson explained the background to the meeting, stressing
that an OSCE and UN presence were important as a way to give
cover to the Turks to allow the EU and NATO to have a meeting
together. The SYG said he would have to protect the Finnish
Presidency from Russian anger about the OSCE participating,
but still thought the OSCE would be able to attend.
Defense Education and Training - Resources Needed
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶12. (C) During the EAPC Ambassadorial, Mr. Henry Bigo,
Executive Director of the PfP Consortium of Defense Academies
and Security Studies Institute, briefed on EAPC/PfP education
and training goals, programs, and activities. Bigo also
encouraged the EAPC to take a good look at the published Food
for Thought paper (e-mailed to EUR-RPM), which provides the
"way-ahead" for the PfP Consortium. He reminded Ambassadors
that the Consortium relies on a small budget (less than USD
1M per year) and could benefit from additional assistance.
¶13. (C) Bigo requested three areas of assistance from the
EAPC: (I) A broader base of contributor nations to the
Consortium; (II) Direct-funding by Partner nations to their
defense colleges, institutions, and faculty to serve PfP
Consortium projects, education, and training. (III)
Voluntary contributions of national staff for the Consortium.
(Bigo did not request a specific number, but noted that they
currently rely on 3 full-time staff members).
¶14. (C) The Secretary General - assisted by Canada - provided
additional background on the Canadian-led PAP-DIB (Defense
Institution Building) Reference Curriculum that aims to
provide NATO partner and emerging partner nations with
in-depth learning objectives and curriculum support on
building and reforming defense institutions. The Curriculum
centers on three themes: public administration and
governance, defense management and economics, and ethics and
leadership.
¶15. (C) EAPC Partners were quick to support the initiatives
and activities of the PfP Consortium. The U.S. noted support
for the program, encouraged specificity of programming to
Partnership requirements, and requested that activities be
linked to an EAPC Work Plan, IPAP, or PfP PARP criteria.
This theme of "tailoring activities towards Partners'
requirements" was echoed by other nations including
Switzerland, Romania, Georgia, and Azerbaijan. Mr. Bigo
later indicated that it is the Consortium's intent to tailor
activities to Partner nations' needs and requirements.
¶16. (C) The SECGEN concluded the discussion by appealing to
EAPC nations to review their contributions and assistance,
noting that, "high quality education and training cannot be
made available on the cheap."
UNSCR 1325 - Guidelines and a Policy to be Developed
Sweden to lead a PRT Study in Afghanistan
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶17. (C) The SYG announced that Allies had decided to adopt
the following approach in developing NATO,s commitment to
the principles of UNSCR 1325:
(I) The International Military Staff (IMS) will task Allied
Command Operations and Allied Command Transformation with
developing "bi-strategic guidelines" that will provide
pragmatic guidance to commanders and their troops.
(II) The NATO International Staff (IS) and the IMS will work
together to develop a policy paper, drawing on national and
international organizational experience.
(III) An ad-hoc working group of Allies (membership to be
determined) will meet to consider the policy, and will then
consult with partners.
(IV) The final paper would be returned to the North Atlantic
Council for endorsement.
¶18. (C) Allies and Partners welcomed this approach but many
also expressed frustration that it had taken so long to reach
this point. Austria, Canada, Sweden, Denmark, Finland,
Norway, Switzerland, Montenegro, Spain, France and Germany
all spoke of their national support for UNSCR 1325 and looked
forward to progress. France suggested EU work on the issue
could inspire a coherent approach. Swedish Ambassador
Veronika Wand Danielsson announced that Denmark, Finland, the
Netherlands, Norway and Sweden will conduct a joint study on
improving the effectiveness of PRTs in Afghanistan in
applying UNSCR 1325. The study is to be completed by Spring
¶2009. Wand Danielsson hoped that all Allies and Partners
would support this work, including by accepting researchers
into their PRTs (Note: In a follow up conversation with the
Swedish Mission to NATO, PolOff learned that planning for
this effort is at the earliest stages. The group plans to
meet in Stockholm in September to launch the project
proposal, as well as to plan the study trips. Sweden's
minutes of the group's initial meeting have been forwarded to
EUR/RPM. This development will undoubtedly lead to requests
for U.S. assistance. End note.)
OLSON