

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 04BOGOTA1748, UNHCHR REPORT ON COLOMBIA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04BOGOTA1748.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
04BOGOTA1748 | 2004-02-20 17:20 | 2011-04-16 00:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Bogota |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
id: 14143
date: 2/20/2004 17:20
refid: 04BOGOTA1748
origin: Embassy Bogota
classification: CONFIDENTIAL
destination:
header:
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
----------------- header ends ----------------
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 BOGOTA 001748
SIPDIS
GENEVA PLEASE PASS TO JEFF DELAURENTIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/19/2014
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL CO UNGA
SUBJECT: UNHCHR REPORT ON COLOMBIA
Classified By: Charge Milton Drucker for reasons 1.5 (b&d)
¶1. (C) Summary: The Office of the UN High Commissioner for
Human Rights (UNHCHR) in Colombia is finalizing its report
for Geneva on the GOC's compliance with its 27 human rights
recommendations. The report is likely to criticize the GOC
for slow and uneven implementation of the recommendations and
its refusal to implement two, or possibly three,
recommendations. Nevertheless, it will recognize that the
GOC fulfilled one recommendation, accomplished substantial
progress in another, and achieved varying progress in half a
dozen others. A group of foreign missions seeking to help
the GOC fulfill the recommendations believes that UNHCHR's
compliance assessment may give the GOC insufficient credit on
several recommendations, and has encouraged the GOC to draft
its own assessment for distribution in Geneva. End Summary.
¶2. (C) The Colombia office of the UN High Commissioner for
Human Rights (UNHCHR), under director Michael Fruhling, is
putting the finishing touches on its evaluation of the GOC's
compliance with 27 human rights recommendations made in the
office's 2002 human rights report and issued in March 2003.
The office will make public in early March its official
report on the recommendations, prior to the UN Human Rights
Commission's annual meeting in Geneva. In meetings with
foreign embassies, Fruhling has criticized the GOC for
waiting too long to engage seriously on implementing the
recommendations and for its uneven commitment to them. The
Ministry of Defense and Office of the Prosecutor General
(&Fiscalia8) have been particular laggards, he maintains.
Of the 27 recommendations, 20 are directed at the executive
branch, four at the independent Fiscalia, and three at
illegal armed groups. According to Fruhling, the executive
branch has fulfilled one recommendation, accomplished
substantial progress in a second, achieved varying progress
in half a dozen others, and rejected two or three.
¶3. (C) Fruhling intends to propose in Geneva that the UNHCHR
be given a mandate to develop a second set of
recommendations, drawn from the current 27, that would guide
his office's work for the next 12 months. Colombian Vice
president Francisco Santos, who has the lead on human rights
within the GOC, would prefer to discard the current set of
recommendations and replace them with more general goals that
would allow greater operational flexibility. According to
Santos, the current recommendations place too much emphasis
on taking bureaucratic steps and not enough on addressing
fundamental human rights problems.
¶4. (C) The European Union and some individual European
countries have emphasized the need for the GOC to comply
fully with the 27 recommendations, in some cases putting such
a premium on compliance with the recommendations that they
overlook real improvements achieved by the Uribe
administration in reducing violence and human rights crimes
in Colombia. Many Colombian human rights NGOs critical of
Uribe and his Government have vociferously advanced the view
that the GOC's uneven compliance with the recommendations
demonstrates a lack of commitment to human rights.
¶5. (C) To assist the GOC with the implementation of the
recommendations, seven embassies accredited to Colombia --
Brazil, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK
and the U.S. -- have formed an informal working group known
locally as the G-7. Over the last two months, G-7
representatives have met with Fruhling and Santos, both
separately and together. Predictably, these meetings have
highlighted differences between the GOC's and UNHCHR's
assessments of the Government's compliance with several of
the recommendations.
¶6. (C) Although Fruhling has declined to share an advanced
draft of his report to Geneva with G-7 ambassadors, he
provided the following oral snapshot to them on February 13:
--The GOC has fulfilled the recommendation on anti-personnel
mines (13).
--The GOC has achieved significant progress in improving the
effectiveness of the Early Warning System (1).
--The GOC has made some, but still insufficient, progress in:
protecting human rights defenders (2); increasing protection
for communities at risk (4); implementing human rights
training at the Ministry of Defense (8); and improving the
public security forces' adherence to international
humanitarian law (12). (Note: The Embassy believes the
UNHCHR report will give insufficient weight to the
Government's extension of state presence throughout the
country and success at reducing key indicators of violence,
including against human rights defenders and communities at
risk. Virtually all the G-7 ambassadors criticized Fruhling
for not giving the GOC more credit for the Ministry of
Defense's human rights training. Public security personnel
continue to commit only a small fraction of human rights
violations. End note.)
--The GOC has not assigned personnel from the Inspector
General's ("Procuraduria") and Ombudsman's ("Defensoria")
offices to all conflictive areas (5), although international
funding had helped the GOC assign such personnel to many
remote and problematic regions. (Note: Fruhling gives the
GOC insufficient credit for having representatives of the
Ombudsman's office in all 33 of Colombia's departments. End
note.)
--The Vice President has established a Special Committee (20)
to advance investigations and prosecutions in select human
rights cases, but progress in closing cases has been too
slow. (Note: The GOC had significantly advanced six of the
one-hundred cases by the end of 2003, and hopes to have
advanced another 15 cases by the end of February. End note.)
--Although the GOC is negotiating with several paramilitary
organizations, neither the FARC nor the ELN are prepared to
enter into dialogue with the Government. It is essential
that the GOC's negotiations with illegal armed groups be
guided by principles of truth, justice, and reparations (14).
--The Inspector General ("Procuraduria") has not taken
disciplinary actions against all state employees who in any
way jeopardized the work of human rights defenders (6). In
this regard, some public pronouncements from senior GOC
officials have been unhelpful.
--Although President Uribe has been clear on the need to
sever the public security forces' links with paramilitaries
(21), more actions need to be taken
--The GOC has begun preparing a national plan of action on
human rights (23), but has not given local governments and
key sectors of society (read human rights NGOs) necessary
input.
--There have been positive discussions with the Ministry of
Education on incorporating human rights education in the
national curriculum (24) and providing human rights training
to judicial entities (25), but little concrete progress has
been achieved.
--Although the Vice President's Office has worked
productively with UNHCHR, the GOC as a whole has not taken
sufficient advantage of the office's human rights expertise
(26 and 27).
--The GOC faces a major challenge in developing policies to
narrow the economic inequality gap in Colombia (22).
--The Ministry of Defense is resisting the requirement to
suspend from duty public security force personnel implicated
in serious human rights violations (19) by relying on what
Fruhling believes is an erroneous reading of relevant legal
codes.
--The GOC made it clear, at the July 2003 London Conference
and subsequently, its disagreement with recommendations
calling for it not to adopt anti-terrorism legislation giving
the military arrest powers (15) and for the independent
Inspector General's Office ("Procuraduria") to inspect
military intelligence files on human rights defenders and
publish the results (7). Fruhling maintains that the GOC
agreed to these recommendations in March 2003 at Geneva, and
is therefore bound. (Note: The Colombian Congress approved
an anti-terrorism statute in December and will consider
implementing legislation next session. The UNHCHR is
exploring with the Defense Ministry a possible compromise on
the review of military intelligence files. End note.)
--The Prosecutor General's Office ("Fiscalia") only signed in
November an agreement to work with UNHCHR, so no concrete
results have been achieved on recommendations 3, 16, 17, and
¶18.
¶7. (C) During the past week, however, a majority of G-7
representatives concluded at meeting with Fruhling that
UNHCHR gives the GOC insufficient credit for compliance with
some of the recommendations and that in others it demands
that the GOC go beyond the language of the recommendations.
In particular, the Dutch and Swedish Ambassadors, who are
among the most conspicuous champions of human rights within
the local diplomatic community, openly questioned whether
Fruhling has been excessively demanding in his assessments of
GOC compliance.
¶8. (C) On February 18, Vice President Santos met with G-7
ambassadors and excoriated the draft report Fruhling had
shown him. He said that the report was highly inaccurate in
key sections; the GOC could accept damning assessments, but
they should at least be accurate. Santos claimed that he
"did not know how to show the draft report to President
Uribe." He asked for advice.
¶9. (C) The Brazilian ambassador urged Santos to produce a
GOC drafted human rights report, noting progress where
warranted but admitting shortfalls, for the UN Human Rights
Committee meeting in Geneva. She was supported by the other
G-7 ambassadors present. The G-7 group then met at the Swiss
embassy without Santos and came to the same conclusion. No
one had much confidence, including the Swedish ambassador,
that Fruhling would modify his report before sending it as a
draft to Geneva. Subsequently, the Swedish ambassador
privately indicated to us that he is considering recommending
that the GOS question the draft report's assessments in
Geneva -- which would be a surprising development, given that
Fruhling is a former Swedish diplomat.
¶10. (C) Comment: The more critical stance of the G-7
ambassadors regarding certain aspects of the UNHCHR Colombia
office's report may not translate into a willingness to
criticize it in Geneva. It has, however, put Fruhling on
notice that he runs such a risk. End Comment.
Butenis
=======================CABLE ENDS============================