

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05SANJOSE2601, MEETING WITH COSTA RICAN MINISTER OF ECONOMY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05SANJOSE2601.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 SAN JOSE 002601
SIPDIS
WHA/CEN
EB FOR WCRAFT, BLAMPRON
EB/CIP FOR WAYALA
WHA FOR WMIELE
WHA/EPSC FOR KURS, LGUMBINER
H FOR JHAGAN
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR RVARGO, NMOORJANI, AMALITO
E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/04/2015
TAGS: ETRD ECPS ECON PREL PGOV SOCI CS
SUBJECT: MEETING WITH COSTA RICAN MINISTER OF ECONOMY
REF: SAN JOSE 02460
Classified By: Charge Russell Frisbie for Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
¶1. (C) Summary. On October 26, 2005, Charge met with
Minister of Economy, Industry, and Commerce Gilberto
Barrantes. Minister Barrantes commented on the status of the
United States-Central American-Dominican Republic Free Trade
Agreement (CAFTA-DR) and related legislation including the
proposed law to strengthen the Costa Rican Institute of
Electricity (ICE). Barrantes stated that the bills that will
implement the changes needed to comply with CAFTA-DR
requirements in the areas of telecommunications, insurance,
and protection of intellectual property rights would be sent
to the Legislative Assembly sometime between now and January
¶2006. The conversation with Barrantes supports post,s view
that it is unlikely the Legislative Assembly will be able to
complete the first of two votes on CAFTA-DR prior to the
upcoming Presidential and Assembly elections on February 5,
2006, and perhaps not even by May 8, 2006 when the new
President and entire Legislative Assembly members (deputies)
will take office. Full approval and implementation of
CAFTA-DR including all necessary changes needed to comply
with the agreement will likely be left to the next
Administration. End Summary.
----------------------------
STATUS OF REVIEW OF CAFTA-DR
----------------------------
¶2. (U) During the October 26, 2005 meeting with the Charge,
Barrantes who also heads President Pacheco's Economic Council
said that Costa Rica is moving forward on CAFTA-DR and the
proof was President Pacheco's sending the trade agreement to
the Assembly on October, 21, 2005 to start the relatively
long ratification process. Barrantes stated that Rolando
Lacle, a deputy from the ruling Social Christian Unity Party
(PUSC) and chair of the Assembly's International Relations
Committee that has the responsibility for reviewing the
agreement said that he will hold committee sessions four or
five times a week to discuss CAFTA-DR. (Note: As required
by law, the legislative project requesting approval of
CAFTA-DR was formally introduced into the Assembly. The
Assembly in principle had five days from October 21 to
discuss and refer the agreement to the International
Relations Committee. However, formal hearings cannot begin
until the entire agreement is published in the Costa Rican
Official Gazette, which could be several more weeks. Further
restricting the window of opportunity, the Assembly likely
will not be in session from approximately December 15 through
the week after the elections, approximately February 13,
¶2006. End Note.)
¶3. (U) Many Costa Rican political experts believe the
International Relations Committee will require at least three
months to (1) review the legislation including the agreement
and associated reports which total more than 3000 pages, (2)
hold discussions with various groups in favor of and against
CAFTA-DR, and (3) send it to the Assembly floor with
recommendations and for a first vote. If passed in the first
vote, the constitutional court will review the agreement and
the legislative procedure used to approve it and offer its
findings. This will take at least one month. (Note: One of
the issues the Constitutional Court will review is the number
of votes required to pass CAFTA-DR. Although most experts
believe only a simple majority is required, some experts
believe that a two-thirds majority is necessary to pass
CAFTA-DR. End Note.) CAFTA-DR will then be sent back to the
Assembly where, if there were no significant findings by the
Constitutional Court, there would be a second vote. In the
case that the Constitutional Court were to have significant
findings, the Assembly would then have to address the Court's
comments accordingly. Even after a successful second vote,
there may still be up to a month for (1) the President to
sign the approving legislation and (2) to publish the
approval in the Official Gazette before the agreement is
considered ratified in Costa Rica. At best, the process will
probably take at least six months.
----------------------------
CAFTA-DR-RELATED LEGISLATION
----------------------------
¶4. (C) Barrantes also said that in November, he, Vice
President Lineth Saborio, Gerardo Gonzalez a PUSC deputy and
President of the Legislative Assembly, and Liliana Salas,
chief of the PUSC party faction in the Assembly, will meet to
discuss the legislative priorities for the Assembly's
extraordinary session that lasts from December 1 through
April 30. They will then send the priority list to President
Pacheco for his review. (Note: During the extraordinary
session, President Pacheco sets the legislative priorities,
as opposed to the ordinary session in which the President of
the Assembly does so. End Note.) Barrantes said that he
believes the list will include the following legislative
initiatives (although he failed to give them any specific
relative priority): (1) CAFTA-DR, (2) a law to implement the
CAFTA-DR requirements regarding the telecommunications
market, (3) a law to implement the CAFTA-DR requirements
regarding the insurance market, (4) legislation approving
loans that would fund CAFTA-DR's corollary complementary
agenda, (5) legislation forming a Costa Rican development
bank to assist development of businesses under CAFTA-DR, and
(6) legislation that would ensure compliance with the
intellectual property rights provisions of CAFTA-DR. (Note:
The only legislation that has been submitted to date are
CAFTA-DR and the complementary agenda funding. End Note.)
¶5. (C) One notable absence on Barrante,s list was that of
the government,s fiscal reform bill. When asked about the
status of this tax bill, Barrantes said that he was not sure
what would happen - that a lot depended on the strategy to be
adopted by Gerardo Gonzalez, the President of the Assembly.
¶6. (C) Barrantes also talked about the proposed law to
strengthen ICE that was sent to the Legislative Assembly on
October 18, 2005, three days prior to sending CAFTA-DR. He
stated that the President chose to proceed this way and to
insist on the Assembly passing the law to strengthen ICE
prior to passing CAFTA-DR to win good will from members of
some of the many labor unions that have voiced opposition to
CAFTA-DR. The bill is supposed to give ICE the financial and
administrative autonomy necessary to compete in a gradually
opened telecommunication industry as required by CAFTA-DR.
Barrantes acknowledged that from a CAFTA-DR compliance point
of view, this proposed law was problematic since it exempts
ICE from having to pay any taxes and gives concessions for
use of most of the telecommunications spectrum. (Note: Annex
13 to Chapter 13 of CAFTA-DR basically requires a strong
regulator of the telecommunications market that ensures equal
treatment and access for all competitors be they publicly- or
privately-owned. End Note.)
¶7. (C) Barrantes said that the issues noted above would be
fixed in the Telecommunications Act that is currently under
review by the Administration and ICE, and that may be
submitted to the Assembly in as early as a few weeks or as
late as January 2006. Barrantes said that perhaps the GOCR
would wait until December or January to lessen the likelihood
that anti-CAFTA forces could marshal university and high
school student support for protests.
¶8. (C) Barrantes said that a significant issue under
discussion regarding the Telecommunications Act was how to
regulate the telecommunications spectrum. He referred to a
World Bank study that is not publicly available that, he
stated, confirms there is enough available telecommunications
spectrum to allow sufficient competition, i.e., it would not
be necessary to take any spectrum away that ICE currently has
the rights to use. At the same time, he also said that the
Telecommunications Act would "clean up" the spectrum.
Barrantes said that President Pacheco personally intervened
over the objections of some ministers and to make the
decision not to address spectrum issues in the proposed law
to strengthen ICE. Barrantes said Pacheco wants to avoid
confrontation with the labor unions at this time by not
appearing to take anything away from ICE in that bill.
¶9. (C) Barrantes stated that the proposed bill to
strengthen ICE would be sent for review by a special
deputies-only committee which would consist of three PUSC
deputies, three deputies from the opposition National
Liberation Party (PLN) and probably one to three deputies
from other parties. He said most of the deputies that will
be on this committee will have served on the now-defunct
special mixed committee to review ICE that reviewed the
previously proposed law to strengthen ICE.
¶10. (C) Barrantes also said that a new and independent
regulatory body would be formed and would be named the
Superintendent of Telecommunications. He admitted that the
Regulatory Authority of Public Services (ARASEP), which had
been rumored to be the responsible regulatory agency, is not
qualified to do the job. Barrantes recognized the difficult
task of building such an organization from the ground up
including finding properly trained and experienced personnel
and generating regulations and defining procedures for an
open telecommunications market. He did say that the
Administration was working with several international
consultants on these issues.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶11. (C) Barrantes,s comments served to underline the
significant barriers to rapid movement toward CAFTA-DR
ratification that remain, and which complicate passage in
¶2006. President Pacheco's insistence that the Assembly pass
the newly introduced law to strengthen ICE which contains
articles, which go against CAFTA-DR commitments, further
muddies the waters. Moreover, Barrantes,s comments about
the possibility of not "freeing up" telecommunications
frequencies highlights a key potential CAFTA-DR compliance
issue. In short, for the GOCR negotiating the agreement may
well have been the easy part, ratifying CAFTA-DR more
difficult, and passing the necessary legislation to comply
with its commitments could well constitute the biggest
challenge.
LANGDALE