

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 10VANCOUVER42, AS BC POSITIONS TO BECOME A CLEAN ENERGY LEADER, CRITICAL
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10VANCOUVER42.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
10VANCOUVER42 | 2010-01-26 22:31 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Consulate Vancouver |
VZCZCXYZ0075
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHVC #0042/01 0262232
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 262231Z JAN 10
FM AMCONSUL VANCOUVER
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0065
INFO ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS VANCOUVER 000042
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG ECON CA
SUBJECT: AS BC POSITIONS TO BECOME A CLEAN ENERGY LEADER, CRITICAL
POLICY GAPS REMAIN
¶1. Summary: Stakeholders in British Columbia's electricity sector
are finally beginning to see some clarity in the BC government's
approach to the procurement and possible export of electricity in
the province. The independent regulator, the British Columbia
Utilities Commission (BCUC), sent shock waves through the industry
in July, issuing a controversial ruling rejecting several major
premises of provincial Crown-owned BC Hydro's Long Term Acquisition
Plan, including the mandate for purchasing green renewable power
over traditional natural gas and large hydro projects. In October
and November, the administration of BC Premier Gordon Campbell
responded, issuing a Special Direction effectively sidelining the
aging natural gas generation plant in question and striking four
Green Energy Advisory Task Forces to provide further guidance.
Critical gaps remain in BC's electricity policy, including a clear
export policy and clarification on private power procurement
practices. In the long run, however, Campbell's administration is
pressing forward with a strong mandate for independent renewable
power for both domestic consumption and export to the U.S. End
Summary.
Background
¶2. BC Hydro is the dominant player in the generation, domestic
sales and export of electricity for British Columbia. As directed
by Campbell's administration in 2002 and reaffirmed in its 2007 BC
Energy Plan, BC Hydro must procure all new generation (with the
exception of one possible future source - the Site C dam on the
Peace River) from Independent Power Producers (IPPs) using
renewable sources, such as wind and water. Ninety percent of the
electricity generated in the province emits no greenhouse gases
(GHGs), and the administration has mandated via the Energy Plan
that it remain this way. All new generation must be GHG net
neutral, and coal and nuclear generation are prohibited for the
foreseeable future. The province must be "self-sufficient" in
energy production by 2016, with the ultimate goal of becoming a
consistent power exporter.
BCUC Says "No" to Private Renewable Power
3.(SBU) Against this backdrop, in its July ruling, the BCUC
rejected BC Hydro's heavy reliance (up to 72%) on Demand Side
Management (DSM)(conservation measures by BC Hydro customers via
various incentive and penalty programs) as being unrealistic, and
declining to endorse BC Hydro's estimates for purchasing IPP
renewable power to meet government's self-sufficiency standard.
Because the BCUC was unconvinced by BC Hydro's argument for DSM to
achieve self-sufficiency, it directed the utility to use the aging
and GHG-emitting 900 megawatt (MW) Burrard Thermal natural gas
power plant located in Metro Vancouver (at present only used for
emergency backup, at ten percent or less of its capacity
annually)to meet power consumption marks. The BCUC justified its
ruling on the basis of cost and reliability, arguing that
acquisition of power from Burrard was cheaper and more reliable
than using the IPPs (particularly given the higher price and
attrition rate of previous IPP projects). In doing so, it appeared
to ignore environmental concerns and goals outlined in the BC
Energy Plan. The July ruling was interpreted by most stakeholders
as a challenge to the government's policy on procurement of
additional renewable power from private producers. The ruling also
jeopardized the much-delayed results of BC Hydro's "Clean Power
Call" - its request for proposals (RFP) from the IPPs. The impact
of the ruling on the industry was immediate. Publicly listed IPPs
experienced sharp declines in their stock values. One IPP President
told us his stock has declined 40% since the BCUC decision was
announced in July. Prior to the BCUC decision, the IPPs had become
a favourite of investors looking to enter the clean energy market.
Companies such as U.S.-based General Electric have invested
significant funds in burgeoning IPPs in BC since 2008.
¶4. Analysts also suggest that the decision points to incomplete
policymaking on the part of the BC government in its directives to
the BCUC. They note that the Campbell administration is struggling
with setting appropriate guidelines for the independent regulator,
which should be considering power procurement decisions on the
basis of broader criteria than the traditional economic efficiency
model of low cost and reliability of sources. In jurisdictions
where renewable power is a policy priority, green attributes are
beginning to matter at least as much as reliability and low cost.
The critics argue that unless regulators have their decision
criteria re-aligned through legislation or special orders,
disconnects will continue to occur between government policy and
regulatory action.
BC Pushing Ahead with Clean Power Call
¶5. The BC government undertook several actions throughout the fall
of 2009 to mitigate the effects of the BCUC decision and get its
green Energy Plan back on track. In late October the Minister for
Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Blair Lekstrom, issued a
Special Direction to the BCUC, clearly signalling the BC
government's intent to end reliance on the Burrard Thermal plant.
This in turn clears the way for BC Hydro to continue with its Clean
Power Call for up to 6,000 gigawatt hours (GWh) of renewable power
(1,000 GWh of which is expected from bioenergy). The much-delayed
call (results were expected in June 2009), has re-started, with a
more limited pool of proposals. The utility has dropped 21 of the
68 proposals initially submitted, accepted another 13 to move
forward, and invited 34 proponents to sharpen their pencils and
re-submit proposals to make them "more cost-effective". This move
has reassured some ratepayers with an interest in continuing to pay
among the lowest electricity rates in North America, while some IPP
project proponents feel that they are taking a loss by having to
re-quote at lower price levels. One IPP contact told us that the
high rate of project failures seen in earlier calls suggests that
the lowest-cost project is not necessarily a more viable project.
¶6. In other actions, the BC Premier announced the formation of
four Green Energy Advisory Task Forces, to incorporate expert
opinions on BC energy policy in the following areas:
a. Procurement and Regulatory Reform - will recommend
improvements to BC Hydro's procurement and regulatory regimes,
particularly concerning the promotion of clean and cost-effective
power generation.
b. Carbon Pricing, Trading and Export Market Development -
recommending ways to advance BC's interest in national or
international cap & trade system(s), and to maximise the value of
BC's green-energy attributes in power generation, domestic
distribution and trading.
c. Community Engagement and First Nations Partnerships - will
recommend ways to ensure First Nations and communities benefit from
renewable electricity generation, and have the opportunity for
input into project development in their regions.
d. Resource Development - will identify impediments to and
best practices for planning and permitting renewable generation in
an environmentally sustainable way, and will work with clean energy
sectors (including for forest fibre) to enhance competitiveness.
Most stakeholders view these task forces, which have been given a
very short time frame to deliberate and report (second week of
January 2010), as a tool to help close some of the policy gaps and
give rubber stamps for the Campbell administration's policies.
¶7. (SBU) Commentary: The BC government has brought the turmoil of
the BCUC decision on itself, providing inadequate guidance to the
regulators on evaluating future power sources in light of GHG and
climate change concerns, and more generally neglecting strategic
policymaking on resource procurement and distribution/export.
There is certainly much more to come with the results of the task
forces' reports, although it is unclear whether these will be made
public. However it likely that an updated Energy Plan is
forthcoming. With such a short time frame, and given the
composition of the task forces, it is safe to guess that their
conclusions and recommendations are pre-ordained. On the input
side, confidential readouts from our contacts suggest that the
relevant task force will recommend feed-in tariffs for IPP
renewable energy, as was recently legislated in Ontario (which
bills itself as the first North American jurisdiction to do so).
Feed-in tariffs set a guaranteed price paid by the utility for
renewable power (set higher than the market rate), typically
combined with ensured access to the electricity grid. On the
output side, there will more than likely be an overt export policy.
IPPs are calling for it, and have calculated that there will be too
much power procured for merely domestic consumption. Further,
their business cases are premised on profits from eventual exports.
It remains to be seen, however, if the domestic constituency will
support the BC government's plan of becoming a major power
exporter, particularly if it means paying higher electrical bills
at home to tap into all that renewable energy from the IPPs. BC
also faces other hurdles in becoming a net power exporter,
including aging transmission infrastructure and U.S. regulations.
We will report in later cables on the outcome of the task forces'
reports and BC's power export challenges. In particular, we will
report on whether BC follows Ontario's domestic input content
requirement for its feed-in tariff. End Comment.
CHICOLA