

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09OTTAWA452, CANADA SEEKS MORE ANTI-TERRORIST TOOLS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09OTTAWA452.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09OTTAWA452 | 2009-06-10 20:59 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO5720
OO RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHMT RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0452/01 1612059
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 102059Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9539
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000452
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PTER PGOV PREL CA
SUBJECT: CANADA SEEKS MORE ANTI-TERRORIST TOOLS
REF: A. OTTAWA 338
- B. OTTAWA 198
- C. OTTAWA 079
- D. 08 OTTAWA 1578
- E. 08 TORONTO 286
- F. 08 TORONTO 114
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The federal government has begun a new
legislative push to restore two anti-terrorism tools --
investigative hearings and preventive arrest -- that lapsed in 2007.
Separately, the government has introduced a bill to allow victims
of state-sponsored terrorism to sue the perpetrators in Canadian
courts. The bill also mandates that the government create a list of
foreign states that sponsor or support terrorism. End summary.
LIBERALS ON SIDE, SECOND TIME AROUND
------------------------------------
¶2. (U) The federal government is again moving to restore two
anti-terrorism tools -- investigative hearings and recognizance with
conditions (preventive arrest) -- that lapsed in February 2007 under
sunset provisions in the 2001 Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA). The House
of Commons began debate on the bill (C-19) to amend the ATA on June
¶8. The bill is the government's third attempt to reinstate the
provisions, which security officials could use to disrupt imminent
terrorist attacks or gather information about an attack that had or
would have been committed. In debate on June 9, Liberal Public
Safety critic Mark Holland confirmed that Liberal MPs support the
government's bid to refer the bill to a lower house committee before
a late June recess, although they will work to amend it in committee
better to balance civil rights. Overall, however, Liberal MP Larry
Bagnell agreed his caucus is "very supportive of the concepts of the
bill."
A BITTER HISTORY
-----------------
¶3. (U) The ATA, which the then-Liberal government brought into law
in December 2001 in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, included
investigative hearings and recognizance with conditions. At the
time, human rights groups and some politicians claimed that the
legislation went too far in restraining civil liberties. As a
result, the government agreed to a five-year sunset clause on the
new powers. In a bitter debate in the House of Commons in February
2007, Liberal MPs combined with the other opposition parties to
defeat the minority Conservative government's motion to extend the
powers. Then-Liberal Party leader Stephane Dion argued that the
powers were no longer necessary and posed too great a risk to civil
liberties.
¶4. (U) The Conservatives pledged to restore the powers, calling them
"important tools" to enable law enforcement agencies to anticipate
and respond effectively to terrorist threats. In October 2007, the
government, unusually, introduced the bill in the Senate rather than
the lower house. The government said the tactic reflected its
desire to de-politicize the issue as well as to draw on the Senate's
expertise in conducting a mandatory review of the ATA. The bill
reinstated the two expired powers in a substantially similar form as
they had existed in the 2001 ATA, but added new safeguards for civil
rights. The Senate passed the legislation on March 6, 2008 and it
moved to the House of Commons, which was not able to act upon it
before the dissolution of Parliament for the October 2008 federal
election.
¶5. (U) The re-elected Conservative minority government reintroduced
the current bill in March 2009, this time in the House of Commons.
It is almost identical to the previous version, but with the extra
provision that Commons and Senate committees could conduct a
comprehensive review of the use or continuing need for the clauses
(although their recommendations would not be binding on the
government).
Qgovernment).
BALANCING SECURITY WITH CIVIL RIGHTS
------------------------------------
¶6. (U) Investigative hearings compel a person with information or
materials about a past or future terrorist offense to appear before
a judge and answer questions or provide material. The purpose is to
gather information, not to prosecute. The hearings are limited to
cases where reasonable grounds exist to believe that a terrorism
offense had been or would be committed. A police officer must
obtain the consent of the Attorney General to invoke the tool and
apply to a provincial court or higher court judge of a superior
court for an order for the hearing. The person compelled to appear
has the right to counsel at any stage of the proceedings. A witness
who evades the order, or is deemed by authorities about to abscond,
can be arrested without warrant and detained for up to thirty days
for the purpose of giving evidence at the hearing. The information
gained from the person cannot be used against him or her in any
criminal proceeding, except for perjury. An additional safeguard in
OTTAWA 00000452 002 OF 003
the bill requires police to satisfy the judge that "reasonable"
attempts have been made to obtain the information by other means.
¶7. (U) Recognizance with conditions (preventive arrest) gives the
police the authority to arrest a person without a warrant to disrupt
nascent terrorist activity and prevent aQ,%>|Qfer. A detained person must be
brought before a judge within 24 hours of his/her arrest or "as soon
as possible" up to a maximum of 72 hours of detention before a
hearing. If the judge is satisfied that reasonable grounds for
suspicion exist, the person could be required to enter into a
recognizance of conditions or conditional commitment (such as having
no contact with specified persons). The person could be imprisoned
for up to 12 months if he/she refuses to enter into the
recognizance.
¶8. (U) The bill includes another five-year sunset clause for both
provisions, as well as new annual reporting rules for the Attorney
General and the Minister of Public Safety to report to Parliament on
use of the powers, as well as their justification for extending the
provision.
¶9. (U) The two powers were never used when in force between 2001 and
¶2007. In 2004, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled investigative
hearings constitutional when it upheld an order for a hearing
arising from the Air India terrorist trial. However, the hearing
never took place, as the trial ended before the Court delivered its
ruling.
SECURING CONVICTIONS
--------------------
¶10. (U) The government has secured two convictions and one guilty
plea under the ATA (reftels):
-- an Ontario court convicted Momin Khawaja in October 2008 of
participating in terrorist training, financing, and facilitating
terrorism for his role in a conspiracy to bomb sites in London, U.K.
In March, the judge sentenced him to ten-and-a-half years
imprisonment, with no chance of parole for five years. Khawaja was
the first Canadian to be charged under the ATA;
-- a Toronto court convicted one youth (whose identify was publicly
protected under Canadian laws due to his age) in September 2008 of
participating in a terrorist activity and sentenced him in May 2009
to two-and-a-half years imprisonment. With credit for time served
since his arrest in June 2006, he was freed immediately, but on
probation. Another youth pled guilty in May 2009 to the same charge
and is awaiting sentencing. Both were members of the "Toronto 18,"
whom police arrested in June 2006 for allegedly conspiring to attack
Parliament and politicians as well as to bomb the Toronto offices of
CSIS, the RCMP, and CBC. Police have stayed charges against three
youths and four adults in the case, but nine other adults are
awaiting trial; and,
-- Moroccan-born Said Namouh came to Canada in 2003 and was arrested
in September 2007. He is currently in custody pending trial on
charges of creating and distributing jihad propaganda, and four
charges related to plotting terror attacks in Canada and Austria.
His bid to have the propaganda charges against him dropped on the
grounds that they infringed on his constitutional right to freedom
of speech failed on June 10, when a Montreal judge upheld the
constitutionality of the ATA.
LIFTING STATE IMMUNITY FOR SUPPORTERS OF TERRORISM
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶11. (U) In June, the government introduced a "Justice for Victims of
Terrorism" bill (C-35) to complement existing counter-terrorism
QTerrorism" bill (C-35) to complement existing counter-terrorism
measures and to allow victims of terrorism to sue perpetrators and
supporters of terrorism. The proposed bill would lift the immunity
of foreign states that the government designates as terrorism
supporters. The bill also establishes a listing mechanism for state
sponsors of terror. If the bill becomes law, the Minister of
Foreign Affairs, in consultation with the Minister of Public Safety,
would advise the government on the establishment of the list.
¶12. (U) The legislation would allow victims of terrorism who can
demonstrate a "real and substantial" connection between their case
and Canada to sue in a Canadian court those foreign states included
on the government's list. Plaintiffs would be able to seek redress
for terrorist acts committed anywhere in the world on, or after, 1
January 1985. Successful convictions could result in seizure of
assets and property. For claims related to terrorist acts committed
outside Canada, plaintiffs would have to give the foreign state in
which the incident occurred "reasonable opportunity" to submit the
OTTAWA 00000452 003 OF 003
dispute to arbitration in accordance with accepted international
rules of arbitration before applying to a Canadian court. In
tabling the legislation, Minister of Public Safety Peter Van Loan
insisted that Canada is sending a "clear message" that perpetrators
of terrorism and their supporters will be held accountable.
COMMENT
¶13. (SBU) Thus far, the debate on the ATA amendments has been
uncontroversial and, crucially, the Liberals appear supportive.
Debate on C-35 has not yet begun. Under new leader Michael
Ignatieff, the Liberals have been careful quietly to support the
robust Conservative anti-crime agenda in order to deprive the
Conservatives of a wedge issue in the next election. Similarly,
they are unlikely in principle to oppose, or substantially modify,
the anti-terrorism bills. The biggest worry now is whether the
bills -- notably the ATA amendments -- can make it through both
houses of Parliament before Canada faces another election, in which
case the draft legislation would again die and the next government
would face the choice of yet another re-introduction.
BREESE