

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA590, 2005 SPECIAL 301 REPORT FROM OTTAWA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA590.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA590 | 2005-02-25 15:51 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
251551Z Feb 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000590
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DEPT FOR EB/TPP/IPE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD KIPR CA CBSA RCMP
SUBJECT: 2005 SPECIAL 301 REPORT FROM OTTAWA
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The regulatory picture on IPR has not
changed much from earlier years, however Canada is moving to
address many of the issues raised in the Special 301
submissions, even though results are unlikely to be visible
before the end of April. On the headline issues of
enforcement and WIPO ratification, there is incremental
progress. Canada continues to inch toward WIPO
ratification, with legislation due this spring. Departments
responsible for IPR issues are also working to develop more
effective cooperation on enforcement, but are not seeking
greater enforcement powers at the border at this point. End
Summary.
¶2. Econoffs met with representatives of FAC, Industry
Canada, International Trade, Health Canada (HC), the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), the Patent Medicine Prices
Review Board (PMPRB), and the Canadian Border Services
Agency (CBSA) to get their perspective on public submissions
under Special 301 and the state of Canadian IPR law in
general. Under the caveat that GOC finds the Special 301
process "deeply flawed", GOC officials responded to the
points in the public submissions and gave an update on the
status of intellectual property protection in Canada.
-----------------------------------------
PhRMA Comments on Patents: GOC Response
-----------------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) Data exclusivity: In December, Industry Canada
published its proposed regulation to allow for longer data
protection for patented medicines. At the same time, Health
Canada has published complementary regulations that would
circumscribe industry's ability to patent incremental
innovations in existing drugs in a practice commonly known
as "evergreening". Public comments on these regulations are
due February 24th. Under the proposed rules, any Health
Canada reliance on proprietary data in judging a generic
application engages the protection period. HC is also
proposing eight years of data exclusivity (three more years
than the current five) and an extra six years for pediatric
information. (Comment: Canadian patent-based industry
reps have told us that in general their industry is happy
with the extended data exclusivity and resigned to tighter
controls on 'incremental innovation.' End Comment).
¶4. (SBU) International Trade Canada (ITCan) and Health
Canada representatives disputed PhRMA's argument that brand-
name manufacturers are legally vulnerable even when they
comply with Canadian Notice of Compliance rules, saying
that, while lawsuits are underway, no decisions have been
reached and therefore it is too early to claim injury to the
industry. They also commented that the pharmaceutical
industry's claims of damages do not take into account the
public costs of using NOC to delay legitimate generic drugs.
¶5. (SBU) Approval times: Health Canada officials
described their efforts to streamline the approval process,
noting their appreciation for FDA's advice and assistance.
In the past year, Health Canada has hired new staff and
adopted some of FDA's practices, such as assignment of a
'point person' to guide each submission through the process,
and a move toward team reviews of submissions. Over 70%
of the existing backlog has been eliminated, and Health
Canada is aiming for on-time review in the near future.
¶6. (SBU) Price controls: Industry Canada reiterated that
Canadian drug prices are in line with OECD prices and that
price differentials also reflect the U.S. and Canadian GDP
per capita differential of roughly 40 percent. (Comment: the
first point is true by definition, since PMPRB generally
sets prices at about the OECD median. The second point,
which we have heard before, is dubious. Canada's per capita
GDP is only about 20% below the U.S. figure; moreover, as
drug costs are assumed by provincial health plans, it is
hard to see why consumer disposable income is a factor. End
comment.)
¶7. (SBU) Patent term restoration: Industry Canada and
Health Canada officials acknowledged that this is a long-
term concern for PhRMA, and noted that PhRMA has had the ear
of several senior government officials on the issue. Canada
is not obligated under WIPO to offer patent term restoration
and has no current plans to do so. Nevertheless, Industry
and Health Canada officials understand that the lack of
patent term restoration affects the investment climate for
pharmaceutical companies. They are optimistic that the
issue will become less pressing as the drug approval process
in Canada becomes faster.
¶8. (SBU) Patent protection for higher lifeforms: Canadian
courts have prohibited the patenting of higher lifeforms.
The GOC has no plans to amend the Patent Act to overrule
that decision. However, Industry Canada experts argue that,
as several Supreme Court Justices pointed out, patenting of
genes offers adequate if indirect protection to
bioengineered life forms. Industry Canada experts noted
that the biotech industry did not mention this issue in a
recent meeting with Industry Minister Emerson.
¶9. (SBU) Access to medicines: GOC officials were puzzled by
the PhRMA comments that "implementation must be in line with
both parts of the WTO decision", as they believe this point
is explicitly covered in both Canadian legislation and draft
regulations.
-------------
Enforcement
-------------
¶10. (SBU) IT Canada and other GOC officials argue that the
enforcement picture in Canada has measurably improved
because of more effective coordination within the existing
legal structure. The GOC has formed an interdepartmental
working group consisting of ITCan, Industry Canada, Canadian
Heritage, the RCMP, CBSA, Justice, and Public Safety and
Emergency Preparedness Canada to coordinate enforcement of
IPR laws. This working group has also met with industry
associations, and GOC representatives are looking forward to
meeting with U.S. officials on STOP.
¶11. (SBU) Since December of 2003, RCMP and CBSA are under
the same minister, a development which has led to greater
cooperation between the agencies. Both CBSA and RCMP
representatives listed increased training and cooperation as
major improvements in IPR enforcement in Canada. A recent 5-
day workshop in Ontario drew over 100 participants, the
largest workshop of its kind in North America. Upcoming
training includes five two-day workshops in 2005 in other
Canadian provinces. The RCMP officials also cited two
continuing joint force operations, Castille in Montreal and
Ocat in Toronto, which have already resulted in the seizure
of large shipments of counterfeit goods. CBSA
representatives highlighted their organization's efforts to
streamline the procedure when they encounter counterfeit
goods, including a standard process for contacting
appropriate officials and determining whether it is GOC's
priority to intercept a particular shipment.
¶12. (SBU) The CBSA representative explained that CBSA
operates on a "risk management" basis using a list of
government priorities, including IPR. Standard procedure
now requires CBSA to detain suspect counterfeit goods until
RCMP or other enforcement agencies are notified and can act.
The CBSA representative also clarified that they can now
look for shipments based on information received from other
law enforcement agencies. Although there is no customs
infraction as such if counterfeit goods are properly
declared, the RCMP representative noted that they almost
always break other laws. He cited as evidence of an
improved enforcement climate the fact that goods no longer
arrive at the Canadian border with declarations that
explicitly identify them as counterfeit.
¶13. (SBU) Justice has also increased IPR training and has
created a network for prosecutors to share case law and
training information. In a positive development, 2004 saw
higher criminal penalties in IPR cases. Two examples were a
C$150,000 fine for a company guilty of selling electrical
goods with fake UL labels and a case where two men were each
fined C$25,000 and sentenced to 60 days in jail for selling
illegal satellite equipment.
------------------
Copyright Reform
------------------
¶14. (SBU) There are no solid developments in Canadian
copyright reform since the US-Canada experts' meeting in
December 2004. Legislation covering WIPO ratification,
access for higher education, ISP liability, and protection
of photos among other issues is currently in the drafting
process. Canadian Heritage expects a bill to be introduced
in Parliament "in the first half of this year", but most
likely not before May, and that the law will probably not
pass this year. In the meantime, the government's reply to
the 2004 Heritage Committee report on copyright reform is
due in April. This report will most likely reflect the
substance of what the government plans to table.
¶15. (SBU) On the controversial 2004 filesharing decision,
ITCan said that many observers considered that section 80
sub 2 of existing law seems to address the situation, and
the Finckenstein decision came as a surprise to many
officials. The December private copying tariff decision
(which excluded embedded memory and harddrive copying from
the private copying levy) is expected to be appealed to the
supreme court. If upheld, GOC experts believe it would
eliminate the legal basis for the filesharing decision, in
which Judge Finckenstein relied upon the existence of the
private copy levy as evidence that such copying was not an
infringement. Econ officers reiterated that the best and
simplest solution to the problem remains rapid ratification
of the WIPO treaties.
------------
Conclusion
------------
¶16. (SBU) At this point, the regulatory picture on IPR has
not changed much from recent years. However, Canada is
moving to address many of the issues raised in the Special
301 submissions, even though results are unlikely to be
visible before the end of April. While WIPO ratification
remains a good way off, Canadian IPR officials are no longer
claiming to us that existing Canadian law offers adequate
protection; pressure from the Heritage Committee and the
consternation generated by the filesharing decision make it
likely that legislation will at last come before Parliament
this spring as promised. While its fate under a minority
government is hard to predict, there is strong support among
both Liberals and Conservatives for WIPO ratification; other
issues contained in the bill are likely to prove more
controversial. On enforcement, it is hard to tell yet
whether better enforcement training and coordination will
lead to more seizures at the border; Post would like to hear
from US firms about their experiences so that we can
continue to engage the interdepartmental committee on the
issue. Action request: GOC has requested advance notice of
USTR's decision if possible; post would appreciate a heads
up.
CELLUCCI