

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE256, EU/CENTAM FTA MARKETED AS A "COOPERATION" ACCORD, BUT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE256.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE256 | 2009-03-31 13:00 | 2011-03-14 19:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
Appears in these articles: http://www.nacion.com/CustomerFiles/nacioncom/Generales/Subsitios/Investigacion/2011/WikiLeaks/bin-debug/ZoomWiki.html http://www.nacion.com/2011-03-13/Investigacion/NotasDestacadas/Investigacion2709043.aspx |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0256/01 0901300
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 311300Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0696
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000256
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA/CEN; WHA/PPC; WHA/EPSC; EEB/TPP; EUR and H
PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR DOLIVER AND AMALITO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON PGOV PREL CS EUN
SUBJECT: EU/CENTAM FTA MARKETED AS A "COOPERATION" ACCORD, BUT
DOUBTS PERSIST IN COSTA RICA
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY. On March 2, the Costa Rican Ministries of Foreign
Affairs (MFA) and Foreign Commerce (COMEX) hosted a seminar on the
Agreement of Association between Central America and the European
Union (Spanish acronym, AACUE). Cabinet ministers and other
speakers touted the AACUE as a welcome departure from "other trade
agreements" negotiated in the region (read: CAFTA-DR). Speakers
emphasized the AACUE's focus on "cooperation" and "political
dialogue" and lauded EU aid commitments embedded in the agreement.
Privately, however, some GOCR contacts seem less impressed. The
Costa Rican Ambassador to the EU opined that the AACUE's focus on
"dialogue" and "feedback" is just "marketing." Other contacts
question whether the EU will come through on the 34 million Euros in
aid earmarked for Costa Rica, and worry about strings that may be
attached. END SUMMARY.
--------------------------------
GOOD VIBRATIONS AND HIGH PRAISES
--------------------------------
¶2. (U) COMEX Minister Marco Vinicio Ruiz opened the conference with
a theme that would be repeated by each speaker: The AACUE is more
than a trade agreement; its goal is the overall well-being of the
Central American region. He noted that the AACUE's three pillars -
commerce, cooperation, and political dialogue - set it apart from
other trade agreements to which Costa Rica has recently been a party
(a clear, if unstated, reference to CAFTA-DR).
¶3. (U) Minister of Planning Roberto Gallardo went further in
contrasting the AACUE and CAFTA. Unlike "other trade agreements,"
Gallardo noted, "the AACUE expressly focuses on cooperation and
dialogue." Gallardo stated that this approach makes sense given
Costa Rica's and Europe's social and political affinities. He
reminded the audience that, while the "superpowers were using the
nations of Central America as pawns," the EU supported the Central
American peace plan proposed by Costa Rican President Oscar Arias.
Because of this, Gallardo said, "no one is protesting in the
streets" over the AACUE. Gallardo welcomed the AACUE as a chance
for "the EU to return to political influence in the region."
¶4. (U) In a similar vein, Roberto Echandi, Costa Rican Ambassador to
the EU and lead AACUE negotiator, emphasized that the AACUE will
allow broader sections of society to have a voice. In addition to
traditional administration-level trade talks, the AACUE contemplates
an "inter-parliamentary commission," formed under the auspices of
PARLACEN, and a "civil society commission," drawn from the labor,
business, and NGO sectors. These commissions will give feedback on
the implementation process and conduct dialogue with counterpart
groups on the EU side. Echandi also unveiled a website through
which private citizens can comment on or suggest development
projects. (http://www.aacue.go.cr/).
---------------------
PROCESS VS. MARKETING
---------------------
¶5. (SBU) On the margins of the conference, Ambassador Echandi said
these dialogue groups will have no real role in negotiating or
implementing the AACUE. Rather, they are an opportunity for
interested parties to gather, comment, and feel like they are "part
of the process." Echandi candidly described these mechanisms as
"marketing."
---------------------------------------------
THE MUCH ANTICIPATED EU COOPERATIVE BANDWAGON
---------------------------------------------
¶6. (U) Ambassador Echandi also focused on the "cooperation" prong of
the AACUE. He announced that the EU is pledging 34 million Euros to
Costa Rica for development projects through 2013. Part of this
money, Echandi said, will be provided "on demand," meaning Costa
Rica will be able to use it "without regard to the priorities of the
donor." Echandi listed several projects already in the pipeline,
including programs to assist Costa Rican producers to reach EU
quality control and sanitation standards; education projects;
programs to encourage women-owned businesses; and community policing
and other "bottom up" security plans.
--------------------------------------------- ------
BUT THE COOPERATIVE BANDWAGON MAY HAVE AN EU DRIVER
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶7. (U) Speakers from the EU brought a measure of realism to the
seminar. Estefano Sannino, Director for Central American Relations
at the EU, emphasized the complexity of the AACUE negotiations. He
said "the last issues will be the most difficult" but hoped to
complete the next round of negotiations by the end of March.
Christina Martins, lead negotiator for the EU, reminded the audience
that the EU considers Costa Rica a "middle income" country which
will not receive the same level of aid as others in the region. She
also cast doubt on Ambassador Echandi's statement regarding "on
demand" funding. Martin mentioned that, while recipient countries
will propose development projects, such projects will be reviewed by
the EU and "jointly planned" by the EU and the recipient country.
--------------------------------------------- -
SKEPTICISM REGARDING THE COOPERATIVE BANDWAGON
--------------------------------------------- -
¶8. (SBU) Several days after the conference, we asked a key
senior-level contact at COMEX about the prospective cooperative
assistance under the AACUE, specifically the 34 million Euro
commitment. The contact doubted whether the EU would actually make
that amount available and believed that, at a minimum, it would be
tied to various controls, benchmarks, and reporting requirements.
Our source went further, questioning the EU's motives for promising
the assistance. In an interesting contrast to the "anti-CAFTA" tone
of the seminar, the contact recognized that CAFTA-DR actually
cleared the way for the AACUE to proceed.
¶9. (SBU) We heard similar comments from a contact at Chemonics, a
USAID contractor working on trade capacity building (TCB) issues in
Costa Rica. This contact also questioned the EU's promised level of
assistance and the EU's motives. The contact maintained that EU
assistance is more appropriate for less developed countries. The
contact also reported an exchange with a Costa Rican colleague who
asked, "Does the EU think that we are in diapers?"
------------------------------------------
ONTO THE 7TH ROUND. . .WITH LITTLE DETAILS
------------------------------------------
¶10. (U) The seminar provided few details about the progress of
substantive negotiations. Costa Rican Foreign Minister Bruno Stagno
stated that Costa Rica hopes to complete negotiations by May 2009,
to allow six months for legal review, and to present the texts for
ratification at the beginning of the Spanish presidency of the EU in
¶2010. (This timing would also nicely cap President Oscar Arias'
term in office, which ends May 1, 2010.) Minister Ruiz stated that
the sixth round of negotiations has now been completed, and that a
seventh round will soon begin in Tegucigalpa.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶11. (SBU) The notably high-powered seminar appears to be part of a
strategy to portray the AACUE as a "kinder, gentler" trade
agreement, as distinguished from CAFTA. The seminar focused almost
entirely on the "cooperation" and "dialogue" aspects of the deal and
ignored the status of substantive trade issues. The GOCR no doubt
wants to avoid a repeat of the protracted and contentious domestic
political debate provoked by CAFTA (and to clear the way for the
next potentially controversial FTA, with China). The risk will be
if the ministers (and the public) believe the "marketing campaign"
promoting the AACUE.
¶12. (SBU) The private, more candid comments by the GOCR and
Chemonics interlocutors remind us that all is not rosy between Costa
Rica and Europe. Tough trade issues remain, as would be expected in
a comprehensive agreement like this, and a notable level of distrust
exists on the Costa Rican side, specifically within the GOCR
negotiation team. Despite these behind-the-scenes realities, the
seminar successfully conveyed to the public and the media the
perception of the AACUE as inclusive and collaborative. A lesson
learned for the USG (which we are applying here) is to "market"
CAFTA-DR in a more comprehensive manner, emphasizing the
collaborative nature of the Agreement, its shared benefits to all
member countries, and the "inclusive" aspects of our CAFTA trade
capacity building assistance for Costa Rica and the region.
CIANCHETTE