

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09QUITO70, QUITO'S NEW AIRPORT MAKES PROGRESS BUT FACES BIG
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09QUITO70.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09QUITO70 | 2009-01-29 19:28 | 2011-05-02 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Quito |
VZCZCXYZ0032
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHQT #0070/01 0291928
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 291928Z JAN 09
FM AMEMBASSY QUITO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9971
INFO RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA 7942
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 3365
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ JAN LIMA 3008
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL 4065
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC 0622
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
UNCLAS QUITO 000070
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EAIR EAID EINV ECIN EC MARR MCAP
SUBJECT: QUITO'S NEW AIRPORT MAKES PROGRESS BUT FACES BIG
CHALLENGES
REFTEL A: 07 Quito 2571
B: 07 Quito 181725Z
C: 08 Quito 986
D: 09 Quito 59
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The construction of Quito's new airport has made
significant progress. The project is large and complex, however,
dealing with an unpredictable political environment, sensitive
community relations, and environmental challenges. The builders
have made several recent missteps that attracted negative press
coverage and scrutiny from GOE officials. In addition, outstanding
elements like a municipal access road and a new public security
facility threaten to delay or otherwise disrupt the new airport's
opening in October 2010. End summary.
Construction Status
-------------------
¶2. (U) Quito's new airport is a massive project that covers 351
hectares and has a projected cost of roughly $600 million. The GOE
has been holding the land for this project since the 1980s but only
began construction in 2006. Since that date significant progress
has been made, and the project is now 42% complete. The builders
say that over 90% of the required materials have been purchased and
the initial earth works, which consisted of leveling the site
plateau for runways and buildings, are 91% complete. In addition,
the builders say that they have nearly finished pouring concrete for
the 38,000 square meter passenger terminals and the control tower.
They expect to complete the structured steel frames for the
terminals in February 2009. They point to progress installing
necessary infrastructure for telecommunications, electricity, water,
sewage, and rainwater drainage. The consortium has also nearly
completed the access road into the site. The builders say the
project is now mostly on schedule, with only slight delays in the
infrastructure elements, which they expect to correct in the next
few months.
¶3. (U) The Quito airport project has been controlled since 1999 by
the Quito municipality-controlled entity Corpaq, which signed a
concession with the Canadian Government entity Canadian Commercial
Corporation (CCC) to develop the airport. CCC in turn hired the
Quiport consortium to manage the current airport and build the new
one. Quiport is made up of Aecon (a Canadian company), Andrade
Gutierrez (Brazilian) and Houston Airport Systems (U.S.). The
project has financial backing from the U.S., Canadian, and
multilateral lenders OPIC, ExIm Bank, Inter-American Development
Bank, and Export Development Canada (Reftel A). The builders stress
that the project is following U.S. and Canadian labor and
environmental specifications, which has proved challenging in
Ecuador. Quiport acknowledges that there has been some friction
over meeting the lenders' expectations, but company representatives
say that they are committed to satisfying these requirements and say
that they have so far been able to sort out any disagreements.
Construction Progress and Dust Problems
-----------------------------------
¶4. (U) The project's most visible problem has been controlling the
large amounts of dust that the construction creates. On most days
the site throws up large clouds of brown dust that can be seen for
miles. This has sparked complaints from local farming communities
and has led to negative press coverage and criticism from
politicians as well as environmental and health experts. Quiport
says that much of the dust stems from the necessary earthworks. It
notes as well that the site's sandy, volcanic soil is difficult to
work with, and that construction delays have dragged out the
problem. Quiport initially budgeted $400,000 for dust control
measures, but the company has already spent over $2 million.
Quiport says that when asphalt is laid for the runways, grass is
planted, and water systems are installed, it should significantly
reduce the dust levels. Quiport is currently taking construction
bids and expects to begin laying down asphalt in June 2009. Company
officials say that most construction will be completed around the
end of 2009, and they plan to spend the first half of 2010 on
testing and certification of the new airport.
Public Stumbles
---------------
¶5. (SBU) Along with its handling of the dust clouds, Quiport has
been criticized by politicians and airlines for significantly
raising airport fees at the existing Mariscal Sucre airport to pay
for the new airport. Since 2006, airport departure fees have risen
from $25 to $40.80 on international flights, an increase of 63%. In
addition, it has raised the landing, parking and other fees that it
charges the airlines. Quiport recently attempted to improve its
public image with a series of glossy newspaper inserts touting the
benefits of the new airport. This effort was derailed, however, by
an announcement in November that Quiport planned once again to raise
departure fees to $44.30. The decision was announced without
consulting Quito Mayor Paco Moncayo, a prominent supporter of the
project. Moncayo sharply criticized the fee hike, and Ecuador's
Prosecutor General opened an investigation, leading Quiport to delay
indefinitely the increase.
¶6. (U) On January 6th, 2009, the Contraloria of Ecuador (similar to
the U.S. GAO) issued a report criticizing the project for cost
overruns. According to the Contraloria, the contracted cost for
constructing the terminals is $100 million more than appropriate,
and called for contracts to be renegotiated. It also criticized the
use of $15.7 million of GOE funds for an airport access road,
consulting, and reforestation, which it said should have been paid
by Quiport. Quiport declined to comment on the report, saying it
was directed at the government airport authority Corpaq.
Politicians seized on the report, however, saying that the cost
overruns were actually much higher and arguing that it justified
renegotiating the construction contract (Reftel D).
Access Road Could Hinder Airport Opening
----------------------------------------
¶7. (U) The new municipal road to the airport has the greatest
potential to cause major delays in the project. This road will be a
direct route from downtown Quito and should result in a travel time
of only 15 minutes. The road is the responsibility of the
municipality, however, and as of yet, no significant progress has
been made. Quiport officials say there is still sufficient time for
the road to be completed by October 2010, but this appears unlikely.
The land for the road is still not secured, and the city is still
reviewing construction bids for what most people expect to be a
complicated project involving the construction of three bridges
(Reftel B). There are also doubts about the municipality's ability
to pay for the project, although it does have support from the
Andean Development Fund (CAF). The existing route to the new
airport is a narrow and winding road that takes at least 45 minutes,
and much more during rush hour. Quiport officials say they would
consider delaying the airport's opening if the road is not completed
on time, since using the existing road would create significant
traffic and image problems.
Public Security Facility Could Also Cause Complications
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶8. (SBU) The public security facility (Armed Forces and Police) at
the new airport could also cause complications. The Ecuadorian
military needs to build the new facility. No work has been
completed so far, and additional delays will increase costs, since
it will require working around completed civilian structures. We
believe that the Ecuadorian military does not currently have the
funds to complete this project. Some have speculated that the
military could remain at the current airport, but for technical
flight reasons this is impossible (Reftel B). The military might be
able to relocate some of its assets to the airport in Latacunga,
which is roughly 90 minutes south of Quito. It is unclear if the
GOE, or international regulators would certify the airport if the
public security facility is not built, however, since it will house
the airport police.
U.S. Airlines Critical of the Project
-------------------------------------
¶9. (SBU) U.S. airlines complain that Quiport and the GOE have not
provided them with sufficient information about navigation aids and
flight patterns for operations at the new airport. Quiport and GOE
officials stress the benefits of the project, saying that it will be
a modern facility and will eliminate the hazards of landing planes
in a crowded urban center (Reftel A). Airline officials dispute
these claims, however, saying that the new airport's location is the
equivalent of taking of and landing "in a hole." They argue that
the new location will be far more challenging for their pilots and
will require expensive use of additional fuel. In addition, some
U.S. and international airlines have resisted paying the increased
airport fees, but lost their legal challenge to the fee increase
(Reftel C). American and Continental had been making their payments
to an escrow fund, but now are obliged to pay directly to Quiport,
although they characterize their payments as made "under protest."
Comment
-------
¶10. (SBU) The new Quito airport is one of the largest ongoing
foreign investments in Ecuador at this time. Under the best of
circumstances, large foreign investments face a number of
challenges, particularly in the regulated sectors. The Quito
airport project is an exception only in that it seems to face
criticisms and challenges from more quarters than most other
investments. That said, the project continues to move forward and
is less than two years from its scheduled opening.
Hodges