

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08HALIFAX36, URANIUM MINING IN ATLANTIC CANADA: PROTESTS VERSUS PROFIT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08HALIFAX36.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08HALIFAX36 | 2008-05-28 11:59 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Consulate Halifax |
VZCZCXRO4856
RR RUEHGA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHHA #0036/01 1491159
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 281159Z MAY 08
FM AMCONSUL HALIFAX
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1283
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0529
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUEHHA/AMCONSUL HALIFAX 1371
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HALIFAX 000036
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA/CAN AND EB/ESC/IEC
USDOE FOR IA (DEUTSCH)
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EMIN ENRG ETRD PGOV PHUM CA
SUBJECT: URANIUM MINING IN ATLANTIC CANADA: PROTESTS VERSUS PROFIT
REF: A. 07 OTTAWA 001201; B. HALIFAX 0013
HALIFAX 00000036 001.2 OF 003
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. Considering there is a vociferous and devoted anti-uranium
lobby in Canada's Atlantic Provinces, it appears unlikely that
the region will be joining the world uranium club any time soon.
There are identified commercial quantities of uranium in three
of the four provinces that could be developed to meet growing
global demand for fuel for nuclear power plants. However,
mining companies have run up against government bans and hostile
citizen groups which could keep the uranium in the ground.
Although this is not the stated policy of any of the governments
involved, politicians are faced with weighing the cost of either
saying no to the anti-uranium forces or to the companies that
want to invest millions in their jurisdictions. END SUMMARY
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
OVERVIEW: URANIUM MINING (OR THE LACK OF) IN ATLANTIC CANADA
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
¶2. Skyrocketing prices and increasing global demand for clean
energy sources have sparked much interest in Atlantic Canada's
uranium deposits. Except for Prince Edward Island which has
only trace amounts of uranium, there are known commercial
quantities in the other Atlantic Provinces:
Newfoundland-Labrador, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. The full
size of these deposits is still being determined, but several
companies are keen to start planning for development. At
present there is no mining underway in the region. If the
anti-uranium forces get their way, there never will be.
¶3. Environmentalists, conservationists and a slew of community
and farming groups in each of the provinces have mounted vocal
protest campaigns against mining companies and business leaders
who want to realize the economic potential from the resource.
Coming down in the middle in the debate are the respective
provincial governments and one newly-established aboriginal
government. So far the politicians have walked a fine line
between the two sides: acknowledging the concerns of the
anti-mining forces, while at the same time endorsing the
industry's assertions that modern technology has lessened the
potential environmental and health impacts of uranium mining.
While the debate shares these commonalities across the region,
the situation in each province is unique and has forced each
government to come up with its own strategy for dealing with the
issues.
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
NEWFOUNDLAND-LABRADOR - STYMIED BY A NEW REGIONAL GOVERNMENT
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
¶4. The Labrador region of the province holds the most promise
of any potential uranium development in Atlantic Canada. Since
2005 Aurora, a private company owned by Vancouver and St. John's
interests, has been exploring in what is known as the Central
Mineral Belt of Labrador, part of the newly designated Inuit
territory of Nunatsiavut. (Detailed information about the
location and Aurora's activities is available on the company's
web site www.aurora-energy.ca). In 2006 the company identified
a substantial amount of uranium at two locations on the Belt,
Michelin and Jacques Lake. The company followed up those
discoveries with another drilling program in 2007 which saw four
additional satellite deposits identified. Aurora estimates that
the combined deposits contain 133 million pounds of uranium,
making the area one of the largest deposits outside
Saskatchewan, the province where all of Canada's active uranium
mines are currently located (Ref A).
¶5. Aurora's original development plan called for the company to
begin the regulatory process by the end of 2007 with an expected
start-up date in 2014. However, after a spirited backlash from
the Inuit community, the company postponed filing its plan in
order to provide residents more information on how it would deal
with the problem of drilling waste. But before they could
provide the information, the issue ended up with the Members of
the Territorial Assembly, who were forced to act to stop a
growing rift between those wanting a ban on uranium activities
and those wanting to see the multi-million dollar economic
benefits accrue to the region from mining the ore. The Assembly
failed to resolve the issue. On April 8 the members voted eight
to seven in favor of implementing a three-year moratorium on
uranium mining in the territory, but in consideration of the
exploration activities already underway, the moratorium only
targets development, not exploration.
¶6. The Nunatsiavut government officials plan to use the
HALIFAX 00000036 002.2 OF 003
moratorium to develop expertise on how to evaluate the impact of
such a large scale project. According to our local contacts,
however, the Assembly could revisit the issue before the end of
the moratorium, especially given the narrow margin of the vote.
Aurora is pledging to work collaboratively with government and
community leaders on assessing the impact of a development
program, which could go a long way in addressing the concerns of
the anti-mining side. For its part, the Newfoundland-Labrador
provincial government is not getting involved in the issue other
than to endorse the Nunatsiavut assembly's right to enact the
ban under the terms of its establishment in 2005. They also
stress that the current federal and provincial regulatory
regimes (which would still apply to any development plan) are
stringent enough to ensure that any drilling project will get a
full environmental assessment.
--------------------------------------------- ------
NOVA SCOTIA - UNDER PRESSURE TO SCRAP A 25-YEAR BAN
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶7. The province of Nova Scotia has had a moratorium on uranium
exploration and mining since 1982, when a small but influential
protest group convinced the government of the day to stop a
company from mining in a location in central Nova Scotia.
Subsequently, world uranium prices slumped and the issue
remained dormant until 2005 when a new local company called
Tripple Uranium Resources (www.capellaresources.com) started
prospecting on acreage near the abandoned site. Despite having
the word "Uranium" in its name, the company (a subsidiary of
Vancouver-based Capella Resources) asserts that it is not
looking for uranium at all, but iron ore, copper and gold. In
fact, the company readily acknowledges that under the terms of
the 1982 ban, it will have to stop its exploration work if it
encounters any mineral deposits exceeding 100 parts per million
of uranium.
¶8. Coincident with the resurrected interest in uranium was the
revival of the anti-uranium protestors who are now asking the
question of what will happen to the ban if Tripple hits a large
amount of uranium. The protestors allege that Tripple is
already pressuring the provincial government to lift the ban in
anticipation of finding commercial quantities of uranium. The
government has made no secret that senior officials have met
with Tripple representatives, but as one of our senior
government contacts told us officials are always willing to meet
with any company interested in developing the province's mineral
resources. For now the government's policy is an expressed
desire that both sides engage in an informed debate on the
issue; however, an all-party committee of the provincial
legislature recommended that the government maintain the ban.
The committee recommendation reinforces the lobbyists' position
that the government should enshrine the ban in legislation.
Currently it is contained in a cabinet decision which mining
opponents assert could be easily be rescinded.
--------------------------------------------- ----------------
New Brunswick - Demands for a Ban in a Nuke-Friendly Province
--------------------------------------------- ----------------
¶9. Tripple Uranium is also one of the companies involved in
uranium exploration in New Brunswick, along with CVRD-Inco. The
two companies are in competing prospecting activities in
southern New Brunswick. Both are keeping the results of their
respective exploration programs secret for proprietary reasons,
but the anti-uranium forces in that province have already
started pushing the provincial government for a ban on further
exploration and future development. That appears unlikely given
the province already has signed exploration agreements with the
companies involved. Furthermore, New Brunswick has the region's
only nuclear power station and is actively considering building
another one (Ref B). Nonetheless, the government is attempting
to respond to the opposition forces by holding public
information sessions beginning in June. That announcement on May
8 did little to placate the lobbyists who have already condemned
the province for deciding to hold the sessions after various
exploration programs are already underway.
-----------------------------------
COMMENT - OH THE POLITICS OF IT ALL
-----------------------------------
¶10. In the end it will no doubt be politics, not exploration
results, which will determine the speed of development of the
region's uranium resources. As our senior Nova Scotia
government contact commented, there is a certain political
timidness in governments even talking about these issues, and
for good reason. Any government leader who comes down on the
wrong side of the issue could expect to pay a heavy political
HALIFAX 00000036 003.2 OF 003
price at the ballot box. On the other side, companies have
already invested millions of dollars in exploration work so far
and will want to do more than just look at prospecting results.
Also, the governments are cognizant of how barriers to uranium
development might be perceived in the mining industry as a
whole, given that there is growing demand for the region's other
minerals.
¶11. For the immediate future, areas to watch will be: how
Aurora fares in its consultative work with the Nunatsiavut
Assembly in Newfoundland-Labrador and if that will result in
another vote on a ban; whether there are any moves to make Nova
Scotia's ban permanent; and in New Brunswick, how the government
fares in its upcoming information sessions. As these events
unfold, they should shed some light on when Atlantic Canada
might be joining the world uranium club, if at all. END COMMENT
FOSTER