

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON92, NZ EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME UNDER REVIEW
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON92.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON92 | 2009-04-09 02:11 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO3135
RR RUEHAST RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHLN RUEHMA RUEHPB RUEHPOD RUEHTM RUEHTRO
DE RUEHWL #0092/01 0990211
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 090211Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5825
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1948
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5488
RUEHAP/AMEMBASSY APIA 0555
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0827
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
RUEHZN/ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000092
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV PGOV KGHG NZ
SUBJECT: NZ EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME UNDER REVIEW
WELLINGTON 00000092 001.2 OF 003
Reftel: 08 Wellington 695
¶1. (SBU) Summary. On December 9, 2008, the newly elected
National-led Government announced its review of the country's
Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). Established by the previous Labour
government, the ETS attracted criticism from many quarters,
including the National Party, for its lack of political consensus
and its potentially adverse impact on economic growth. Insiders
predict that any new legislation will not repeal the existing ETS
but rather amend it to give greater weight to its economic impact.
A harmonized approach to emissions trading with Australia is seen as
desirable by National and both governments have begun to jointly
study this option. End Summary.
PM Key Favors Fiscally Prudent ETS
----------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) Prime Minister John Key believes that humans have
contributed to global warming and that New Zealand should have an
effective system to reduce the country's greenhouse gas emissions
and enable the trading of emission reduction credits. However, PM
Key has stated that he will only support such a system if it does
not punitively impact the New Zealand economy. Before the 2008
election, Key's opposition National Party was critical of the
previous Labour Government's Climate Change Response Amendment Act
2008, which established New Zealand's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)
(reftel). Key argued that Labour's ETS was established without the
due diligence and political debate required to form the political
consensus essential to address a significantly long-term issue, such
as climate change. Additionally, Key asserted that any ETS should
have as a fundamental consideration its impact on domestic economic
growth.
ETS Still in Place, but Under Comprehensive Review
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶3. (SBU) Following the November 2008 election, the newly formed
National-led government chose not to repeal ETS, but rather to
initiate a parliamentary study of the program. On December 9, 2008,
Key announced the creation of a Select Committee of Inquiry (Review
Committee) to review the ETS and consider alternative mechanisms for
addressing climate change. This announcement honored a commitment
made to the hard-right ACT Party to secure its support in forming a
government after the election. While the Review Committee conducts
its examination, the ETS program will remain in force despite
pressure from ACT to suspend its operation. However, the first
stage of the ETS emissions reduction timetable does not commence
until 2010, which leaves some time to review and amend the program.
Scope of ETS Review Committee Inquiry
-------------------------------------
¶4. (U) The Review Committee has announced that, during the course
of its inquiry, it will:
- Hear views from trade and diplomatic experts on the international
relations aspects of this issue;
- Consider the prospects for an international agreement on climate
change post-Kyoto 1, and the form such an agreement might take;
- Require a high-quality, quantified regulatory impact analysis to
identify the net benefits or costs to New Zealand of any policy
action, including international relations and commercial benefits
and costs;
- To identify the central/benchmark projections which are being
used as the motivation for international agreements to combat
climate change; and consider the uncertainties and risks surrounding
these projections;
- Consider the impact on the New Zealand economy and New Zealand
households of any climate change policies, having regard to the weak
state of the economy, the need to safeguard New Zealand's
international competitiveness, the position of trade-exposed
industries, and the actions of competing countries;
- Examine the relative merits of a mitigation or adaptation
approach to climate change for New Zealand;
- Consider the case for increasing resources devoted to New
Zealand-specific climate change research;
WELLINGTON 00000092 002.2 OF 003
- Examine the relative merits of an emissions trading scheme versus
a tax on carbon or energy as a New Zealand response to climate
change;
- Consider the need for any additional regulatory interventions to
combat climate change, whether through an ETS or a new form of
taxation, such as a carbon tax; and
- Consider the timing of the introduction of any New Zealand
measures, with particular reference to the outcome of the December
2009 Copenhagen meeting, the position of the United States, and
actions by the Australian government.
Committee Composition and Timeline
----------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) The Review Committee is comprised of members from many of
the political parties sitting in Parliament with a view to obtaining
a balanced consideration of and consensus on other alternatives.
National, as Parliament's biggest party, has four seats; Labour
three seats; the Green Party, Maori Party, ACT and United Future all
have one seat.
¶6. (SBU) In an unusual move, Key appointed a minister outside of
Cabinet, United Future leader Peter Dunne, to chair Review
Committee. Dunne is Revenue Minister and Associate Health Minister.
It is an unusual appointment because ministers do not usually sit
on committees involving legislation. Key justified the appointment
on the grounds that Dunne is an experienced member of Parliament and
generally considered neutral on this issue. Although the Green
Party questioned how neutral a government minister could be in the
position of chair, Dunne's appointment was generally well-received
inside and outside of parliament. Dunne is pro-ETS and soon after
his appointment stated that "New Zealand needs a robust emissions
trading scheme in place as quickly as possible to reassure
businesses and shore-up our international credibility".
¶7. (U) The Committee held its first meeting on December 18, 2008
and has met several times since. It plans to report back to
Parliament in April/May 2009. The Government intends to pass any
proposed legislation by September 30, 2009, before the scheduled
implementation of the existing ETS program that begins in 2010.
Three Possible Outcomes of the ETS Review
-----------------------------------------
¶8. (SBU) Rob Eaddy, Chief of Staff to Committee Chair Dunne,
offered post three possible scenarios at the conclusion of the
Review Committee process. The most likely outcome, according to
Eaddy, is a proposal to revise the existing ETS in a manner that
earns broad political support and which gives more consideration to
the impact on the domestic economy. Another scenario posited by
Eaddy involves the Committee recommending the imposition of a carbon
tax in lieu of the carbon market feature within an ETS. However,
Eaddy believed this to be the least likely scenario.
¶9. (SBU) Eaddy's third scenario is one in which Australia and New
Zealand create a tandem scheme that recognizes the strengths and
weaknesses of their respective economies. Eaddy added that this
outcome has long been Key's most favored solution and revealed that
Key canvassed this concept with Australian PM Kevin Rudd when they
met on March 2 in Sydney.
GNZ and GOA Announce Talks to Harmonize Plans
---------------------------------------------
¶10. (SBU) Meanwhile, as the Review Committee works toward a
proposed solution, the GNZ and GOA are looking seriously at the
harmonization option. On March 20, NZ Climate Change Minister Nick
Smith and Australia Minister for Climate Change and Water Penny Wong
announced the establishment of a trans-Tasman working group to
explore harmonization of their countries' respective emissions
reduction and carbon trading regimes. According to Smith and Wong,
options include everything from common adoption of key design
elements to a full harmonization. No timelines were set by Smith
and Wong.
¶11. (SBU) Leading NZ business journalist Brian Fallow has, however,
expressed doubt that NZ and Australia can easily reconcile
differences in their respective approaches towards emissions
trading. Fallow asserted that beyond the political rhetoric lays
the reality of various stumbling blocks that may make harmonization
WELLINGTON 00000092 003.2 OF 003
very difficult or perhaps unfeasible under policies. Fallow cited
differences between the two countries in how they each plan to meet
Kyoto targets and how emission units would be traded.
Political Parties on ETS Review
-------------------------------
¶12. (SBU) National's support partner, the ACT Party, opposes any
form of an ETS. ACT believes carbon trading is prone to fraud and
that no case has yet been made to prove that the benefits of an ETS
would exceed the costs. The Labour Party and the Green Party have
both offered to work with the Government on an amended ETS.
Labour's Climate Change spokesman Charles Chauvel acknowledges that
the governing National Party is firmly in the driver's seat on the
ETS review. [Note. Even Labour and the Greens, who have
historically advanced strong pro-environment policies, now realize
that their positions must take into account the realities of the
present global economic situation and its impact on achievable
environmental goals. End Note]. Minister Smith welcomed the Labour
and the Greens respective offers and reaffirmed the Government's
desire to build political consensus on how best to tackle climate
change. Jim Anderton, the solitary Progressive Party MP, supports
an ETS, as does the Review Committee Chair Peter Dunne, United
Future's only MP. The Maori Party has yet to articulate a position
on the ETS.
Insights on NZ's Post-Kyoto Negotiations
----------------------------------------
¶13. (SBU) Tim Groser, New Zealand's Minister for International
Climate Change Negotiations, expressed his disappointment in a March
23 media interview that the December 2008 Posnan talks yielded
little progress toward negotiation of a post-Kyoto agreement.
According to Groser, the best that can be achieved in the Copenhagen
talks planned for December 2009 will be some kind of framework
agreement.
¶14. (SBU) Groser also discussed New Zealand's perspective as it
enters into post-Kyoto negotiations. NZ's greenhouse gas emissions
are "massively in excess of our Kyoto obligations", according to
Groser, "and taking on even more ambitious targets is a tough ask."
In addition, he commented that NZ is uniquely and badly placed among
Kyoto signatories because "there is no technical fix for methane
emitted from livestock." NZ must, stated Groser, take into account
the large percentage of NZ greenhouse gas emissions that are
generated by agriculture (49 percent), and the unavailability of
technology that would allow NZ to reduce those emissions.
¶15. (SBU) Another issue for New Zealand in future negotiations is
forestry, said Groser. He explained that the Kyoto rules assume
that all carbon from trees is released as soon as the trees are cut
down, but that is not true. Consequently, Kyoto imposes a penalty
when trees are cut down, even though they are replanted in another
place. That result penalizes New Zealand, which wants to transfer
more of its forests to marginal hill country.
Comment
-------
¶16. (SBU) Given the current economic situation and the GNZ's desire
to avoid any measures that could negatively affect NZ's export
earnings (which are predominately agriculturally based), we
anticipate the GNZ will study this issue carefully and delay as long
as politically possible the implementation of ETS measures for the
ag sector. The public and much of the political clamor for New
Zealand to meet its Kyoto obligations have quieted since the global
financial crisis. New Zealand environmentalists and the small band
of dogmatic pro-environment politicians are likely to press the
Government towards committing to firm targets in the lead up to
Copenhagen, while NZ and Australia officials examine what is
realistic for both their economies. End Comment.
Keegan