

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06HELSINKI696, EU-US INFORMAL SENIOR-LEVEL MEETING ON JUSTICE AND HOME
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06HELSINKI696.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06HELSINKI696 | 2006-07-21 12:28 | 2011-04-24 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Helsinki |
VZCZCXRO7598
RR RUEHAST
DE RUEHHE #0696/01 2021228
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 211228Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY HELSINKI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2195
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
RHEFHLC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HELSINKI 000696
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SNAR PREL PGOV CVIS CPAS KCRM KFRD SMIG EUN FI
SUBJECT: EU-US INFORMAL SENIOR-LEVEL MEETING ON JUSTICE AND HOME
AFFAIRS COOPERATION
HELSINKI 00000696 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY. The U.S. and EU, under the chair of the Finnish
Presidency, met in Helsinki on July 18 for the Informal Senior Level
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) Meeting. Led by Acting INL DAS
Elizabeth Verville, DOJ liaison to USEU Mark Richard, and DHS Acting
A/S for Policy Development Paul Rosenzweig, USDEL continued its
ongoing dialogue on issues related to counterterrorism, law
enforcement, border security and migration. USDEL emphasized the
importance of building upon existing cooperation and improving
coordination, most notably to ensure a continuous flow of
information between respective law enforcement agencies. In this
regard, both sides welcomed the progress in negotiations for an
agreement between the U.S. and Eurojust, as well as the final
signature on the bilateral protocols that once ratified will enable
the implementation of the U.S.-EU Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) and
Extradition Treaties. In addition, EU representatives confirmed that
the passarelle option would be pursued under the Finnish Presidency
and expressed hope that a final decision could be taken by December,
which would thereby change decision making on justice related
issues. USDEL thanked the EU for receipt of its proposal for a
revised Passenger Name Record (PNR) agreement and welcomed future
discussions. EU participants stressed the urgency to come to an
agreement to cover the interim period, September 30, 2006 - November
2007, before a new agreement could be concluded. Lastly, EU reps
requested the U.S. confirm a date for the U.S.-EU JHA
Ministerial-Troika, proposed for November 6 in Washington. It was
also suggested to hold the JHA High Level Policy Dialogue on Border
and Transport Security (PDBTS) on the margins of the Ministerial
meeting. END SUMMARY.
Counterterrorism and Security
------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) EU reps provided a status report on the implementation of
the EU Counterterrorism (CT) Strategy. While the EU is making
progress on biometric requirements for passports, development of the
Schengen Information System (SIS) II is facing technical
difficulties and will likely not be ready by the April 2007
deadline. In response to a U.S. request for direct access for third
countries to SIS II data, the EU stated it would be difficult to
allow such access for political reasons, although there would be no
technical impediments to sharing. However, the EU is currently
exploring whether the Interpol database system could serve as an
alternative with respect to sharing of specific categories of data.
The European Commission (Commission) also reported it has been
consulting with private sector stakeholders on critical
infrastructure protection and on the development of detection
technologies in the field of CT. On the latter initiative, the
Commission will publish a green paper this summer and welcomes U.S.
input. In regards to the misuse of charities, the EU has held
discussions with the nonprofit sector, but indicated that it does
not intend to pursue a legislative approach at this stage as a way
to prevent terrorist support being accomplished via such charities.
¶3. (SBU) U.S. and EU participants agreed on the importance of
coordinating with G8 CT initiatives and of promoting further
research on terrorist's misuse of the Internet in order to tackle
radicalization and recruitment. Richard stressed the importance of
also focusing on operational issues in addition to concentrating on
public diplomacy initiatives. The Commission noted that an EU
delegation visited Washington on July 17 for consultations on the
EU's project to develop a non-emotive lexicon. The EU is also
establishing an expert advisory group that will issue two reports,
one on the state of current research on radicalization due in
November, and a second report on the phenomenon as such, which is
due to be released in January 2007. A/S Rosenzweig briefly
described DHS efforts in this area, including DHS Science and
Technology's research programs and civil integration initiatives in
Citizen and Immigrant Services and suggested that both sides
coordinate efforts to avoid unnecessary duplication.
¶4. (SBU) EU representatives stressed the importance of recent
dialogue with regard to human rights and terrorism, emphasizing the
importance of POTUS statements at the June Summit on the intention
to close the Guantanamo detention facility and the recent Supreme
Court ruling on military tribunals to try enemy combatants. USDEL
clarified that the Supreme Court ruling established Article III of
the Geneva Convention as being applicable to enemy combatants and
ruled that the system of military tribunals is inconsistent with
U.S. law, which is being addressed by Congress.
¶5. (U) Under this item, USDEL also introduced Jane Horvath, DOJ's
recently appointed Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer. She
provided EU delegates with an overview of the data protection model
in the U.S. government. In particular, she highlighted the focus on
the protection of privacy in the Administration's information
sharing efforts. [NOTE: On the margins, EU participants seemed very
eager to learn more about Horvath's function within the U.S. system,
HELSINKI 00000696 002.2 OF 003
particularly as it related to data protection and oversight. For
example, Eurojust extended an invitation for Horvath to brief the
organization on the Administration's data protection efforts.
Europol requested a copy of her office's upcoming, statutorily
mandated report. The EU Council Secretariat representative made
comparisons with Horvath regarding U.S. data protection and EU data
protection. He indicated a desire to learn more. END NOTE]
Justice and Law Enforcement Issues
----------------------------------
¶6. (SBU) Both sides praised the recent breakthrough in negotiations
for a U.S.-Eurojust agreement, and highlighted the possibility of a
signing ceremony at the U.S.-EU Ministerial in Washington this
November. Eurojust also indicated its intention to circulate a
questionnaire that once completed would assist in further
discussions on the use of intelligence in criminal proceedings. In
addition, with the final signature on the bilateral protocols of the
U.S.-EU Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) and Extradition Treaties, the
EU and U.S. agreed that training would be critical to ensure proper
and timely implementation, especially of the banking provision, and
should not wait until ratifications are complete.
¶7. (SBU) Europol also noted that three countries had yet to ratify
the third protocol to the Europol Convention, which would allow U.S.
access to Europol's analytical case files thereby increasing the
depth of operational cooperation. Europol indicated that it would
reach out to these remaining countries and USDEL indicated its
intention to do so as well. USDEL also highlighted the need to work
out processes for receiving requests from Europol as U.S. officials
based in Europol had yet to develop a solid relationship with their
Europol counterparts.
¶8. (SBU) In regard to the UN Convention against Corruption,
Verville highlighted ongoing discussions in advance of the
Conference of the States Parties (COSP) scheduled for December 2006
and stressed the importance of examining the core provisions,
including criminalization, international cooperation and asset
recovery. While monitoring would need to be looked at, Verville
noted that a solid base for implementation must first be
established. The Finnish rep expressed a preference to focus first
on a monitoring mechanism.
¶9. (SBU) In relation to the Balkans, USDEL noted that the draft
charter for SECI contained stringent data protection provisions that
would prevent cooperation with the U.S. EU reps indicated that a
second version is still in the drafting stages and offered no
further information. On counter-narcotics issues in Afghanistan, EU
reps reacted cautiously to a U.S. proposal for Member States to use
the 1988 UN Drug Convention as the basis for extradition of drug
traffickers as they foresaw problems related to jurisdiction in such
cases. Eurojust agreed to take the issue back to The Hague and
report the proposal to its members, getting back to the U.S. as soon
as possible.
¶10. (SBU) The EU reported that progress had been slow on the EU
draft Data Protection Framework Decision, but hoped to complete it
by end of this year. EU reps refused to comment on how this
Framework Decision could affect information sharing with third
country law enforcement, or how or whether existing agreements would
be preserved. Rosenzweig also highlighted for the EU that a vast
majority of current law enforcement cooperation is conducted
informally and outside the framework of formal agreements. The
Finns also indicated that they will be moving forward on the
passarelle option as a way to improve decision-making on justice and
police matters and hoped for a decision by December. Under this
option, unspecified justice issues would be moved from consensus
decision making by Member States (Third Pillar) to qualified
majority voting (First Pillar). Significantly, they would
thereafter fall within the ambit of the current Pillar One Data
Protection Directives, as well as Parliament involvement in any
proposed legislation.
¶11. (SBU) Finally, USDEL informed EU reps that the U.S. would soon
be placing an intellectual property (IP) enforcement coordinator in
Eastern Europe, in addition to placing permanent IP attaches in
select Embassies and Consulates. USDEL also provided an overview of
a meeting between FBI and the European Police College (CEPOL) to
discuss potential avenues of cooperation. The Commission emphasized
that cooperation with the U.S. would have to be approved by the
Council.
Migration, Borders and Visa Issues
----------------------------------
¶12. (SBU) USDEL thanked the EU for receipt of the EU's proposal for
a revised PNR agreement and welcomed future discussions. EU
participants stressed the urgency to come to an agreement to cover
the interim period, September 30, 2006 - November 2007. In addition,
HELSINKI 00000696 003.2 OF 003
EU reps noted that some Member States will need to invoke
Constitutional procedures to ratify a new agreement, which might not
happen until 2007. The EU hoped, but could not guarantee, that all
Member States could put an agreement into immediate effect on a
provisional basis, pending ultimate parliamentary endorsement.
¶13. (SBU) The Commission delegation noted that the release of their
latest report on visa reciprocity would likely be delayed until
September.
¶14. (SBU) Rosenzweig urged EU Member States to share lost and
stolen passport (LASP) data with Interpol and suggested that they
confiscate LASPs when found at borders - as the US is doing.
Frelick (State/CA) provided a progress report on administering U.S.
e-passports. In addition, the EU provided a brief overview of
FRONTEX, which was established to facilitate operational cooperation
at EU external borders. EU reps noted that FRONTEX was seeking to
establish working relationships with third countries and had thus
far reached out to Russian Border Guards. Rosenzweig indicated DHS
interest in working cooperatively, particularly on best practices,
and invited further discussion. Rosenzweig also discussed
developing aviation entry/exit screening in light of a possible
pandemic to avoid stopping all international travel, and asked the
EU to consider working with us to develop a common set of protocols
or standards. The EU reps cautioned that data protection would need
to be addressed before such cooperation could ensue which might
include any effort to identify individual travelers.
Other Issues
------------
¶15. (SBU) At the end of the meeting, German Director General Gunter
Krause questioned when the Finnish Presidency would conduct the
expert group meeting, as indicated in the May 4, Vienna communiqu,
to discuss the future EU-U.S.-Russian tripartite cooperation and
make recommendations for the German Presidency. Verville inquired
as to what topics the EU/Presidencies had in mind, as well as the
advantages and recommendations of such a dialogue. Verville
suggested that the U.S. and EU discuss respective bilateral
cooperation with Russia in advance of conducting a meeting that
included other countries. She also added that while the U.S.
remained open to the concept, she was not in a position to put forth
any suggestions as the U.S. had not yet identified discussion topics
that would achieve concrete benefits. The EU Presidency agreed with
Verville's summation and suggestion. [NOTE: On the margins of the
dinner, Krause, sensing a lack of enthusiasm from Finland or in
Germany raised with Verville and Rosenzweig an uncleared proposal to
continue the four Presidency-U.S.-Russian dialogue by, in essence,
expanding the tripartite meeting with Russia to include Azerbaijan,
Armenia, Moldova and Georgia. In response to Verville's question as
to what they would expect to raise/achieve in such an expanded
meeting, Krause said he was looking for answers, but did not have
one himself. Krause said they would await an answer/reaction from
the U.S., and Verville replied that such an answer would be
facilitated by knowing what they had in mind by way of an agenda and
outcomes. END NOTE]
¶16. (U) The U.S. delegation included: Elizabeth Verville, State
Acting INL DAS; Paul Rosenzweig, DHS Acting A/S for Policy
Development; Mark Richard, DOJ Liaison to USEU; Kathleen Conway, CBP
Liaison to USEU; Christine Cline, State/INL; Timothy Eydelnant, Emb
Helsinki; Alcy Frelick, State/CA; Jane Horvath, DOJ; Kenneth Kolb,
Emb Helsinki; Alessandro Nardi, State/EUR; Kenneth Prop, State/L;
Michael Scardaville, DHS; and Jessica Steffens, State/INL.
¶17. (U) EU participants included: Antti Pelttari, Director General
for the International Security Affairs Unit in the Finnish Ministry
of Interior; Matti Jousten, EU-Coordinator in the Finnish Ministry
of Justice; Giles de Kerchove, Director in the EU Council
Secretariat; Paul Hickey, Director in the EU Council Secretariat;
SIPDIS
Marque Tung-Lai, Director of JLS General Affairs in the European
Commission; Jan De Ceuster, Head of the Unit on Borders and Visas in
the European Commission; Roelof-Jan Manshot, Vice-President of
Eurojust; Maz-Peter Ratzel, Director of Europol; Michael Grotz,
Deputy Director General of German Federal Ministry of Justice;
Gunter Krause, German Federal Ministry of the Interior; as well as
Vivian Loonela, Administrator in the European Commission; Christiane
Hohmann, Administrator in the European Commission; Kari Rantama,
Finnish Deputy National Police Commissioner; Pentti Visanen, Finnish
Immigration Department; Kalle Kekomaki, Finnish Ministry of
Interior; Elina Isoksela, Finnish Ministry of Justice; Sakari
Vourensola, Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA); Leena
Kiukkonen, Finnish MFA; Juha Rainne, Finnish MFA; Hikka Nenonen,
Finnish MFA; and, Veli-Pekka Rautava, Finnish MFA.
¶18. (U) This cable has been cleared by the U.S. Delegation.
WARE