

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE168, COSTA RICA: STRATEGY FOR ADVANCING IPR
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE168.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE168 | 2009-03-12 18:58 | 2011-03-21 16:30 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0168/01 0711858
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 121858Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0578
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 5054
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000168
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
EEB/TPP/IPE FOR JURBAN AND SKEAT
PLEASE PASS TO DOJ FOR BLIPMAN
PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR DOLIVER, AMALITO AND GVETERE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON KIPR PGOV PREL CS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA: STRATEGY FOR ADVANCING IPR
REF: A) 07 SAN JOSE 0335
B) 08 SAN JOSE 0155
C) 09 SAN JOSE 0138
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Post leveraged the February 10-14 visit by
Department of Justice OPDAT Program Director Robert Lipman and U.S.
Judge Virginia Hernandez Covington to advance our three-point
strategy on intellectual property rights (IPR) enforcement. Our
strategy seeks to (1) facilitate USPTO, DOJ, and other sources of
training for the Costa Rican judiciary, (2) encourage greater IPR
cooperation between other Latin American countries and Costa Rica,
and (3) collaborate on private sector IPR lobbying/pursuit of IPR
case resolution. Our aim is to slowly move the cause of IPR ahead
in Costa Rica, despite the minimal engagement of the Attorney
General (AG) on these issues. Lipman and Covington met with a broad
sampling of stakeholders (including the AG, and Mexican prosecutors,
via a DVC) in order to present a thorough overview of IPR issues.
Specific next steps include: pursuing DOJ-offered training for
judges at Costa Rica's Judicial School, supporting a private sector
alliance for prosecuting IPR crimes, engaging the AG's office on
training opportunities for prosecutors, and encouraging further
collaboration with the GOM and other regional countries on IPR
training and DVC exchanges. END SUMMARY.
------------------------------
SESSIONS WITH THE STAKEHOLDERS
------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) The Lipman/ Covington February 10-14 visit provided us the
opportunity to engage with a variety of stakeholders on IPR issues.
We arranged for meetings with the following institutions/ groups:
-- Judicial Investigative Agency (OIJ, FBI-equivalent);
-- University of Costa Rica;
-- National Registry (similar to USPTO in function);
-- Ministry of Public Security;
-- Judicial School;
-- Judicial branch IP attorneys;
-- Costa Rican Attorney General;
-- a forum of private sector executives;
-- a forum of judicial and legal officials; and
-- a DVC collaboration with Mexican IPR prosecutors (courtesy of
Embassy Mexico City).
¶3. (SBU) Typically, DOJ conducts a training module when it arrives
in country. However, due to the unique IPR circumstances in Costa
Rica -- recently passed legislation as part of CAFTA-DR entry into
force (EIF), an AG independent of the executive branch, and a lax
legal environment (Refs A, B, and C) -- Post and DOJ decided a
series of meetings with stakeholders would generate the best
information and guide overall engagement on IPR and tactics for IPR
training in Costa Rica.
-----------------------
PROFILE OF AN OBSTACLE
----------------------
¶4. (U) As reported in previous Special 301 Reports (Refs A, B, and
C), the office of the Costa Rican AG sits in the judicial branch,
(fiercely) independent of the executive branch. Within the judicial
branch, the President of the Judiciary (the President of the Supreme
Court) has only nominal authority over the office of Attorney
General. Thus, the AG office holder, in this case, Francisco
Dall'Anese, exercises broad powers and exerts independence from the
other branches of government including the judiciary.
¶5. (SBU) Currently, our relations with the AG are cordial and
formal. The formal aspect results from the AG's requirement that
all contact with the office of the AG on any issue, consular,
judicial, anti-drugs, trafficking in persons, IPR, etc., be
channeled through the Director, Office of Technical Assistance and
International Relations, Andrea Murillo. This "gatekeeper" approach
tends to constrain the pace and efficiency of communication.
Dall'Anese was re-elected to a second four-year term in late 2007,
but our contacts speculate that he is unlikely to run for a third
term in 2011.
¶6. (U) Regarding IPR, the AG repeatedly states two issues:
-- the AG's office does not have the resources to pursue IPR crimes
given other priorities, i.e. prosecuting two former Presidents and
organized crime; and
-- the private sector has the resources so it should prosecute IPR
crimes through civil and/or criminal action.
This publicly stated position posed a difficult issue for the GOCR
during CAFTA-DR implementation. The Ministry of Foreign Trade
(COMEX) agreed to USTR's request to establish a special IPR
prosecutor's office, which required then Vice President Laura
Chinchilla (now a presidential candidate) to request the AG to
establish the office. The AG committed to assigning responsibility
for IPR issues to an individual within the Miscellaneous Crimes
unit, but not to setting up a dedicated unit/office per se. Thanks
to USPTO and DOJ training opportunities in late 2008, we were able
to establish relations with the Miscellaneous Crimes issues (through
Director Murillo).
------------------------------------
ALTERNATIVE PATHS AROUND AN OBSTACLE
------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) Considering the AG's IPR views and tactics, we designed a
three-point strategy for achieving IPR progress in the short and
long run, which, we hope, will chip away at resistance in the
judiciary.
-- First, invite all relevant components of the judiciary to as many
IPR-related training sessions (USPTO, DOJ, etc.) as possible. In a
conversation with the Ambassador in August 2008, Supreme Court
President Luis Paulino Mora indicated his interest in DOJ training
while affirming that there is a "cultural or reluctance" in Latin
America against IPR prosecution. We will use his interest to help
support our efforts (even if the AG's office is less cooperative at
times);
-- Second, in the interest of broadening the horizons of Costa Rican
prosecutors and attorneys, we contacted other U.S. Embassies in the
region to identify IPR prosecutors/ supporters working on the
frontline of enforcement. During the Lipman/ Covington visit, a DVC
linked Mexican IPR prosecutors (broadcasting from Embassy Mexico)
with Costa Rican prosecutors (broadcasting from Costa Rican
prosecutor's office). The exchange produced an informative
dialogue. In terms of pursuing cases and the formal organization of
IPR within the respective judiciaries, Mexico is certainly ahead of
Costa Rica. As a result of the DVC, Mexico offered to help Costa
Rica with IPR training. (COMMENT: Embassy San Jose thanks Econoff
Joseph Salazar of Embassy Mexico for making the arrangements with
Mexican IPR prosecutors and facilitating the DVC in Embassy Mexico
City. END COMMENT); and
-- Third, the Costa Rican private sector maintains a very different
view of IPR than the AG and believes that innovation must be
protected. During the Lipman/ Covington visit, key officials from
AmCham, the chamber of exporters, the chamber of information and
communications technology, and private law practices met with
Lipman, Covington and Emboffs to advance the idea of the private
sector aggressively pursuing IPR cases through a cooperative
alliance. Cases could be civil or criminal, since Costa Rican law
allows for private parties to pursue criminal cases in loose
cooperation with the AG's office. Such legal actions would
(hopefully) force the judiciary to recognize the importance of IPR
protection to Costa Rican commerce and highlight the issue in the
local media.
¶8. (U) Separate but related to our efforts, COMEX is strongly
supporting the IPR Council, a multi-agency body that meets weekly to
discuss IPR issues. Headed by the Ministry of Justice, the
Council's members include representatives from the Ministries of
Public Security, Science and Technology, and Trade (COMEX); Customs;
the National Registry; the Judicial School; the Judicial
Investigative Agency; and the Fiscal General. Adriana Chaves, a
prosecutor and a recipient of DOJ IPR training in late 2008,
represented the Fiscal General at the most recent meeting.
----------------------------------
GOALS FOR THE SHORT- AND LONG-TERM
----------------------------------
¶9. (SBU) The goals of our three-point IPR strategy (training,
international collaboration, and private sector support) are A) to
better collaborate with the Costa Rican judiciary in a variety of
ways and B) to produce cases for prosecution by way of private
sector pressure and involvement. Since Supreme Court President Mora
in essence requested training assistance, we will provide it, using
USPTO, DOJ, and even other countries in order to keep IPR issues on
the judiciary's radar screen. Meanwhile, the private sector will
mount a "flanking attack" by introducing cases into the court system
which will be heard by some judges with USPTO and/or DOJ training.
In the long run, i.e. post-2011, when Dall'Anese will likely have
left office, we hope that the USG-provided training and the cases
pushed by the private sector will have changed the "culture of
reluctance" sufficiently so that prosecutors and judges will
understand the importance of IPR enforcement and be more willing to
prosecute cases.
---------------
ONE OTHER LEVER
---------------
¶10. (SBU) The USG retains one other lever, of course, in the form
of the Special 301 Report. With the necessary legislation in place,
2009 will be an interesting trial for Costa Rica's IPR resolve. We
hope that the GOCR will make good use of training and collaboration
opportunities this year.
---------
NOW WHAT?
---------
¶11. (U) In the wake of the Lipman/ Covington visit and the Mexican
DVC, Post has several immediate initiatives to pursue:
-- a DOJ training session for judges at the Judicial School (in
June);
-- a meeting of the private sector alliance to outline a plan for
lobbying and for prosecuting IPR crimes. The lobbying campaign
would press the judiciary to prosecute IPR crimes, and the
legislature to approve the yet-to-be passed, IPR-related 14th
CAFTA-DR bill);
-- continued dialogue with the AG's office to determine what type of
training is appropriate for IPR staff prosecutors;
-- provision of DOJ software -- the Real-Time Analytic Intelligence
Database (RAID) application in Spanish -- to the Judicial
Investigative Agency (OIJ) at no cost (COMMENT: Investigative
analysts and document examiners in law enforcement use RAID to
provide document and evidence intelligence in a distributive
computer network environment. END COMMENT); and
-- Mexican training of IPR staff in the office of the AG.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶12. (SBU) Ultimately, we cannot predict how successful our
three-point strategy may be, but it underscores our commitment to
focus Costa Rican attention on the IPR issue. We position our
argument not only as a CAFTA-DR obligation but also as a fundamental
building block to Costa Rican commerce and the arts since innovation
and creativity are the basic ingredients of a flourishing business
and cultural environment. We welcome any change, no matter how
incremental, on the part of the AG regarding IPR enforcement.
However, we also believe that the most progress can be gained by
working around the AG, marking progress with cooperative partners in
the quest of small victories now, while preparing for what we hope
will be a more dramatic, positive shift in the attitude of the
office of the AG in the future.
CIANCHETTE