

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05HELSINKI353, POSSIBLE GEORGIAN TRAFFICKING CONNECTION WORRIES
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05HELSINKI353.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05HELSINKI353 | 2005-03-24 08:11 | 2011-04-24 00:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Helsinki |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 HELSINKI 000353
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EUR/NB AND G/TIP
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/22/2015
TAGS: PHUM KCRM KWMN SMIG SOCI FI
SUBJECT: POSSIBLE GEORGIAN TRAFFICKING CONNECTION WORRIES
FINNS
Classified By: POLOFF DAVID ALLEN SCHLAEFER FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) and (D)
¶1. Summary:
--------
(U) Finland's National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) and
Frontier Guards announced on March 7 that they believed as
many as 1,500 Georgian women may have been trafficked through
Finland to destinations scattered throughout western Europe
from 2002-2004. According to the NBI, the operation was run
by a Russian organized crime syndicate that arranged for
busloads of women to enter Finland under the guise of tour
groups. The women had previously obtained Swedish and
Italian tourist visas in Moscow, and had told Finnish
Frontier Guards that they were transiting Finland on their
way to their vacation destinations. Several days after this
announcement, Finnish Frontier Guards intercepted a busload
of 48 Georgian women attempting to enter Finland at the
Valimaa checkpoint along the Russian-Finnish border. The
women were taken to a refugee reception center; four men that
were with the group were detained on suspicion of
trafficking-in-persons. Finnish authorities attempted to
handle the case in a manner consistent with Finland's
soon-to-be-published new anti-TIP National Action Plan
(emphasizing victim's rights). However, the subsequent
investigation indicates that the women were not involved in
sex trafficking, but in labor trafficking or labor smuggling.
As the women refused to cooperate with Finnish authorities
and asked to return to Georgia, Finnish authorities arranged
a chartered flight to Tbilisi (the Russian Government
reportedly denied them transit en route home). This case has
served to heighten Finnish public awareness of trafficking,
and has caused both officials and editorial writers to
comment that perhaps the GoF has erred in past statements
that trafficking is not an issue in Finland. End Summary.
A Rude Awakening
----------------
¶2. (U) The GoF in the past has often maintained that
trafficking-in-persons is not a significant problem in
Finland. This attitude has slowly changed over the past two
years, as evidenced by the Finns enthusiastically hosting
with Embassy Helsinki a major conference on child-trafficking
in 2003, an OSCE conference on victim assistance in 2004, and
a NATO conference on combating TIP just two weeks ago.
Finland has also passed legislation making TIP a criminal
offense (Fall 2004) and is on the verge of publishing a new
National Action Plan aimed at creation of a victim-centered
approach to trafficking-in-persons. Concurrent with these
initiatives has been a growing recognition that there are
women trafficked to and especially through Finland, and that
trafficking may exist where before Finnish authorities saw
only organized prostitution or smuggling. Nonetheless,
revelations over the past two weeks of large-scale
trafficking of Georgian women has caught Finnish authorities
off guard and served as a rude awakening to many in the
Finnish public.
¶3. (U) Finland's FBI-equivalent, the National Bureau of
Investigation (NBI), announced on March 7 that as many as
1,500 young Georgian women may have been trafficked through
Finland to destinations in Western Europe. It is thought
that many of these women were destined to work as prostitutes
in the red light districts of cities such as Brussels,
Amsterdam and Berlin, although some have been part of labor
trafficking or smuggling operations. In each case, the women
entered Finland at the Valimaa checkpoint along the
Finnish-Russian border on the road from St. Petersburg. They
had Georgian passports with visas from either the Italian or
Swedish Embassies in Moscow, and had represented themselves
as tour groups to the Frontier Guards at the border
checkpoint. The Guards let the buses pass since the women
possessed valid travel visas for EU countries in the Schengen
area. However, the Frontier Guards recorded the bus's
registration and license plates. Subsequently, Greece
reported to the EU that tour buses were leaving Greece for
"return trips" to Georgia with only a handful of passengers
on them. Finnish authorities, taking note of the Greek
report, confirmed that these were indeed the same buses that
had earlier entered Finland from Russia full of female
passengers.
¶4. (U) The announcement garnered considerable media attention
in Finland. The Helsingin Sanomat, Finland's major daily
newspaper, ran an editorial acknowledging that the State
Department's TIP report had been correct in pointing out that
trafficking was a problem in Finland. The paper wryly
commented that the U.S. appeared to know more about what was
happening at Finland's border than Finns did. Major Ilkka
Herranen, a regional Commander in Finland's Frontier Guard,
told the press that the Georgia revelations gave reason to
reconsider Finland's official position on trafficking.
According to Herranen, "In the past, (Finnish) authorities
have generally refused to see Finland as a country of transit
or destination of trafficking human beings. Now we have to
admit that Finland is at least a transit country and possibly
a country of destination to some extent."
Another Busload
---------------
¶5. (U) Only a few days after the initial announcement about
the possible Georgian trafficking connection, a busload of 48
women and 4 men was intercepted at the Valimaa checkpoint by
the Frontier Guard. The bus was registered to a Swedish tour
agency, and the passengers fit the profile of the previous
incidents. The women all had valid visas issued by the
Swedish Embassy in Moscow. A man claiming to be a tour guide
told Finnish authorities that the women were on a chartered
tour with a destination of an inexpensive "Italian market"
for shopping. When asked why they were entering Finland, the
man said their itinerary was Tbilisi, Moscow, Helsinki,
Stockholm, Copenhagen, Germany, Austria, Italy, Greece,
Turkey, to Georgia, but was unable to provide any explanation
for the roundabout trip. The women had little money, and
many seemed to have no idea what their itinerary was,
although they all appeared to have been coached to state that
an "Italian market" was their final destination. The
Frontier Guards detained the four men on suspicion of
trafficking-in-persons, and took the women into protective
custody.
¶6. (U) In the past, the Frontier Guard would normally have
denied entry to the women and turned the bus back around
toward Russia. However, in anticipation of a new GoF
National Action Plan on trafficking aimed at creating a
victim-centered approach to TIP in Finland, the Guards took
the women to a refugee-asylum center run by the Ministry for
Labor in Joutseno, also along the border but some 150
kilometers north of the Valimaa checkpoint. Consultations
among the MFA, Labor, Interior, and Social Affairs ministries
led to an early decision to treat the women as trafficking
victims and open an investigation into the case. The Finnish
press widely reported that the women were presumably being
trafficked to work as prostitutes elsewhere in Western
Europe. However, the subsequent police investigation
determined that it was more likely the women were being
trafficked or smuggled for labor; most of the women were in
their 30's, 40's and 50's, and none of them were younger than
26 (the oldest being over 60).
¶7. (U) The women declined to provide details of their
situation to investigators and repeatedly asked to return to
Russia, despite assurances that they would not be deported if
they wished to cooperate with investigators and remain in
Finland. After one week in the reception center, the
Interior Ministry determined that there were no grounds to,
in effect, keep the women detained against their will in
Finland. Since Russian authorities refused to grant transit
rights for the bus to drive to Georgia, a chartered flight
was arranged to return the group to Tbilisi. According to
Finnish authorities, Georgian media was reporting that the
women were prostitutes bound for Western Europe. A Finnish
official accompanied the group on the return flight to
discuss the investigation with Georgian authorities and to
dispel the Georgian media's notion that the women were sex
workers so that they would not be stigmatized upon their
return (a fear that some of the women had expressed). The
detained men were released for lack of evidence.
Learning Curve
--------------
¶8. (C) The exact nature of the current case remains unclear;
Finnish police report that since they could not ascertain the
conditions in which the women would have been working had
they not been intercepted, they are unsure if the case
involves trafficking or smuggling of illegal immigrants. The
case did afford the Finns an opportunity to test new
procedures for investigating trafficking, however.
Coordination among the various Finnish agencies involved was
not always smooth. In particular, senior officials at both
the Labor and Foreign Affairs Ministries told Poloff that
they were disappointed with the reaction of the Ministry for
Social Affairs and Health (MSAH). Finland's new National
Action Plan calls for the MSAH to play a key role in victim
assistance. According to the MoL and MFA, the MSAH "hid
behind a lack of resources" and refused to take
responsibility for the Georgian women; this refusal led to
the Labor Ministry's offer to shelter the women at the asylum
reception center as long as necessary. The head of Finland's
inter-agency TIP working group still believed that such
difficulties were to be expected, and that the GoF had
learned valuable lessons from the case about the need for
better communication and coordination among the affected
agencies as well as about interview techniques with the women
and their handlers. Interior Minister Rajamaki also used the
opportunity to publicly speculate on the need for new law
offering residency to those who cooperate as witnesses in
trafficking investigations.
WEISBERG