

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05CALGARY723, IMPERIAL MOVES TO REGULATORY HEARINGS, BUT COMMITMENT TO
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05CALGARY723.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05CALGARY723 | 2005-12-08 19:35 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Consulate Calgary |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
081935Z Dec 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 CALGARY 000723
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA/CAN, EB/ESC/ISC, EB/PPD
USDOE FOR IA (DEVITO, PUMPHREY, DEUTSCH)
MOSCOW FOR TOM HUFFAKER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG EPET ETRD PGOV CA
SUBJECT: IMPERIAL MOVES TO REGULATORY HEARINGS, BUT COMMITMENT TO
BUILD MACKENZIE PIPELINE WILL HAVE TO WAIT
REF: OTTAWA 3505
¶1. (SBU) Summary: After months of delay and uncertainty,
Imperial Oil and its partners in the proposed Mackenzie Valley
natural gas pipeline announced in November that they are ready
to move to public hearings. While Imperial claims the
announcement is "not a decision to build a pipeline", the move
represents the first real step forward since Imperial cancelled
preparatory work last spring, and opens the door for the
National Energy Board (NEB) to begin its series of public
hearings with stakeholders in the north. The NEB, in the
meantime, has begun a two week pre-hearing conference in the
Northwest Territories (NWT) that will provide information on the
hearing process as well as information on the NEB's role
throughout the lifecycle of the pipeline. Emphasizing
sensitivities surrounding the project, NEB Chairman Ken Vollman
recently told CG that the board was unable to discuss the
specific "merits" of the project, but offered a general outline
of the process and a timeline for conclusion of the hearings.
In a separate meeting with CG, Imperial Oil's Senior VP
expressed guarded optimism that the Mackenzie project will move
forward. End summary.
--------------------------------------------- --------------
------------------
Imperial Notes Mackenzie's Outstanding "Killer" Concerns
--------------------------------------------- --------------
------------------
¶2. (SBU) CG and Econ Assistant met with Imperial Oil Senior Vice
President Randy Broiles on December 6 to discuss the November 23
announcement that Imperial and its partners in the proposed C$7
billion Mackenzie Valley natural gas pipeline - ConocoPhillips,
ExxonMobil, Shell Canada, and the Aboriginal Pipeline Group
(APG) - are ready to proceed to public hearings and seek
regulatory approval from the Calgary-based National Energy Board
(NEB). Broiles said the announcement is a positive move forward
after partners halted work in April, but noted two "killer"
concerns that remain. Broiles, a native Texan who came on board
with Imperial in July 2005, said he has studied the project for
the last five months describing it as "weak" economically. He
noted that "forward" gas prices are the same today as two to
three years ago, but investment in the project has jumped some
20%-30% during that same time. Costs from contracts, to
equipment, to steel prices have risen, so all cost estimates for
the project have risen accordingly. Broiles also expressed some
concern with respect to the amount of gas reserves from the
three anchor fields (Taglu, Parsons Lake, and Niglintgak) on
which the project is based, suggesting that the reserves may not
be enough to support the 30-inch diameter pipeline, designed to
deliver 1.2 to 1.9 billion cubic feet of gas per day.
¶3. (SBU) Broiles said the second "killer" concern is the
outstanding access and benefits agreements with First Nations
located along the proposed 1220-kilometer route. Broiles said
agreements have been reached with the Inuvialuit (led by former
NWT Premier Nellie Cournoyer and which he describes as the most
business savvy group), the Gwich'In, the Sahtu, the K'ahsho
Got'ine and Tulita/Deline. The holdout in the equation is the
Deh Cho, the only group along the route to not have a potential
ownership stake and which, according to Broiles, is using the
fact that it has no land claim agreement with the federal
government as leverage through which to gain more benefits from
project partners. Broiles pointed out that Ottawa and Imperial
will negotiate simultaneously with the Deh Cho to reach land
claims and benefits agreements, but the land claims agreement
has clearly complicated and delayed dealings with Imperial. Deh
Cho lands cover some 40% of the pipeline's route.
--------------------------------------------- --------------
------
Imperial Welcomes Ottawa's "Fiscal" Assurances
--------------------------------------------- --------------
------
¶4. (SBU) But Broiles noted the developments that helped partners
reach their decision to move forward to the hearing process,
notably the welcome "assurances" partners received from the
federal government. Broiles, who stated that Ottawa has less of
an appetite for taxation and more for royalty changes, described
Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan's recent proposal one of
"preferred profit sharing". Broiles was referring to the
Minister's letter of November 18, which outlined a fiscal and
royalty structure proposal that would, firstly, see Ottawa
accept royalties in kind with a commitment to ship on the
pipeline; in other words, Ottawa would take its cut in gas
rather than cash. Secondly, Ottawa would step in to guarantee
shipping above the current 830 million cubic feet per day that
shippers are comfortable backing. Thirdly, Ottawa would review
a royalty regime where industry pays higher royalties when
volumes of gas and prices are high, and lower royalties if
volumes and prices dip. Lastly, Ottawa would offer to back the
line with federal cash. Broiles had considerable praise for
Minister McLellan stating that, were she to lose her seat in the
upcoming federal election, "she would be missed". Broiles
opined that, should that happen, support for the project would
not change under a Conservative Party government.
¶5. (SBU) Broiles said an "optimistic" timeline for having the
pipeline on-stream would be the end of 2011. Following some 18
months of hearings, construction would commence winter 2007
followed by two more years of winter construction. (As an
aside, Broiles estimates public hearing expenses at some $15-$20
million per month beginning in 2006, given the company's "teams"
(whether environmental and regulatory, etc.) that will be
required to attend each of the NEB and Joint Review Panel (JRP)
hearings throughout the NWT.) Broiles added that, should any
unforeseen information be required by either the NEB or JRP, it
could be enough to delay the project to perhaps give the
proposed Alaska Pipeline project an advantage. While Broiles
thinks that is essentially unlikely, he added it is not
impossible.
¶6. (SBU) On that note, Broiles spoke of the controversy
surrounding the proposed Alaska Pipeline project, including the
federal government's impending decision on whether the Canadian
portion of the line will fall under the jurisdiction of the NEB,
favored by the pipeline's backers: ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil
and BP, or the Northern Pipeline Act (NPA), favored by
Calgary-based TransCanada, which claims route exclusivity under
a 1977 Canada-U.S. treaty. Broiles agreed with CG that the GOC
is waiting for Alaskan officials to resolve fiscal negotiations
with producers before making a decision. That decision will
inevitably be further delayed by the upcoming Canadian federal
election and a possible change in government. Broiles added
that, should the Alaska pipeline proceed before Mackenzie,
"costs will go sky high".
--------------------------------------------- --------------
-------------------
NEB Protects Sensitivity of Mackenzie Valley Public Hearings
--------------------------------------------- --------------
-------------------
¶7. (SBU) CG and Econ Assistant also met with Ken Vollman,
Chairman and Gaetan Caron, Vice Chairman of the NEB on December
2 for a general discussion on the Mackenzie Valley public
hearings. When post first contacted the NEB for an update on
the project, we were told that the NEB could not specifically
discuss its merits, given that the board was about to begin
formal hearings. Vollman explained that two sets of hearings
would be held in "a parallel fashion" beginning January 23,
2006: 1) regulatory hearings by the NEB, and 2) environmental
hearings by the JRP. Vollman noted that regulatory hearings
will address all issues other than environmental, including
questions regarding "adequate gas supply" for the pipeline;
whether contracts are in place; the design of the pipeline and
its size, ie., the current proposal is some 30%-40% larger than
what the natural gas fields can immediately supply; and
permafrost, which Vollman claims is perhaps one of the most
important issues to be addressed given that there is not much
good information currently available on constructing pipelines
that will be laid in a permafrost region. Vollman said he
expects the JRP hearings to be completed and a report sent to
the GOC by the end of 2006. NEB hearings would continue, and
their report would be presented to the GOC by mid-2007.
Following approval and, should the Producers' Group wish to
proceed with the project, construction would commence for the
2007-2008 winter season, as noted above by Imperial.
¶8. (SBU) With respect to the Alaska pipeline and an NPA versus
NEB jurisdiction, Vollman said that is strictly a policy
decision, and the GOC appears prepared to let Alaska "sort their
stuff out" first. Even after a Canadian federal election and a
possible new government, a decision is not likely to be
announced too quickly. That said, Vollman concedes that the
GOC, nevertheless, has been "positioning itself" with respect to
permitting and other administrative issues regarding the
proposal. Both Vollman and Caron agreed that the actual NEB
process would not be affected by movement, one way or the other,
by the Alaska pipeline.
---------------
Comment
---------------
¶9. (SBU) Imperial's recent announcement may not mean a
commitment to build, but all of our interlocutors and industry
observers concede that it is, indeed, positive movement
following last spring's setback. As Randy Broiles noted to us,
a final decision to proceed will not be made by Imperial until
it has had a chance to review the NEB's decision in 2007, the
cost implications of any conditions/requirements implicit in the
report. Tough challenges remain and they are formidable, most
notably the obstacles presented by the lone holdout - the Deh
Cho. While Imperial would have preferred to have all benefits
and access agreements in place before the end of the year, the
company acknowledges that it will likely take the "better part
of a year" to reach a final agreement.
AHMED