

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON102, NEW ZEALAND'S $1.5NZ BILLION BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON102.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON102 | 2009-04-22 03:03 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO5667
RR RUEHAG RUEHCHI RUEHDF RUEHFK RUEHHM RUEHIK RUEHKSO RUEHLZ RUEHNAG
RUEHPB RUEHRN RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHWL #0102/01 1120303
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 220303Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5840
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1953
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5497
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0832
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 0297
RUEAFCC/FCC WASHINGTON DC
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
RUEHZU/ASIAN PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION
RUEHSS/OECD POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000102
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/ANP, EEB/CIP/BA FOR TIM FINTON, AND DOC/ITA/OTEC FOR
ANDREW BENNETT
STATE PASS TO FCC ROBERT TANNER
STATE PASS TO NTIA
STATE PASS TO PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECPS ECON NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND'S $1.5NZ BILLION BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT
INITIATIVE
Ref: State 27310
WELLINGTON 00000102 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) Summary. In March, Communications and Information
Technology Minister Steven Joyce unveiled plans for GNZ to offer up
to NZ$1.5 billion for building high-speed broadband infrastructure
to cover seventy-five percent of New Zealand. A Crown-owned
investment company is expected, along with private sector partners,
to invest a total of NZ$3 billion into "regional fiber companies"
which will install fiber-optic networks throughout New Zealand's top
25 most densely populated cities and towns. The effort is part of
the government's attempt to marry an overall fiscal stimulus package
with investment in new technology to produce long-range economic and
commercial benefits. The GNZ admits that there are challenges for
the success of the initiative and the Labour opposition has already
slammed the plan as a waste of tax payer money. End Summary.
GNZ to Invest NZ$1.5 Billion in Broadband
-----------------------------------------
¶2. (U) At the end of March, Communications and Information
Technology Minister Steven Joyce unveiled plans to create a
Crown-owned investment company known as the "Crown Fibre Investment
Co" (CFIC) with a mandate to invest up to NZ$1.5 billion of
government funds for building high-speed broadband infrastructure
throughout New Zealand. CFIC will, alongside private sector
investors, put money into "regional fiber companies" that will
install fiber-optic networks in 25 New Zealand towns and cities.
¶3. (U) The effort comes as part of the government's attempt to
marry an overall fiscal stimulus package with investment in new
technology which it hopes will generate long-range economic and
commercial benefits. The new company's goal is to boost broadband
speeds to 100 megabits per second - more than 50 times faster than
speeds currently available - by connecting fiber-optic cables to
homes and businesses. The money will be dispersed via private
companies on a regional basis in a series of "Public-Private
Partnerships." A feasibility study commissioned by the NZ Treasury
and conducted by Milner Consulting Ltd. projects that total fixed
investment (infrastructure costs) required to connect seventy-five
percent of urban New Zealand is expected to range between NZ$2.6 and
NZ$3.3 billion.
Seventy-five Percent of New Zealand to be Connected
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶4. (U) The 25 (initial) centers identified are based on population
and range from Auckland, with 1.2 million people, to Oamaru, with
population of 12,681. Once finished, the GNZ hopes this investment
model "will deliver on the government's commitment of ultra fast
broadband to 75 percent of New Zealanders where they live, work and
study over the next ten years," said Joyce. Those towns or rural
areas outside this initial group would eventually get "improved"
internet services but that would occur in the second phase of the
initiative. The more remote regions could expect eventual upgrades
to broadband but they would not have the fiber enabling the
ultra-fast broadband, said Joyce.
Commerce Commission Report on Current NZ Broadband
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶5. (U) Apart from the CFIC initiative, the New Zealand Commerce
Commission's latest report claims that the quality of current
broadband services improved greatly by end of 2008. The Commerce
Commission released its report just days after the government
announced the CFIC initiative. The report, drafted by IDC
Consultants and Epitiro (consulting firms contracted by Commerce
Commission), claims that Telecom, TelstraClear DSL, Vodafone, Orcon
and Slingshot (firms with the largest share of the current NZ
internet market) have boosted their broadband scores by between 99
percent and 166 percent over the course of 2008. Most of this was
due to investment in their current networks and additional
improvements stemmed from the inclusion of ADSL2+ technology
(Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line - a data communications
technology that enables faster data transmission over copper
telephone lines).
WELLINGTON 00000102 002.2 OF 003
¶6. (U) As of June 2008, New Zealand ranked 19 out of 30 OECD
countries in terms of numbers of broadband connections, with about
20 broadband subscribers per 100 of population. Total broadband
connections, including fixed and wireless connections, had reached
915,000 by December 31, 2008. The overall quality of broadband
services has also improved, with major internet service providers
investing in extra network capacity. Nearly 60 per cent of digital
subscriber line (DSL) connections had now been upgraded to the newer
and faster ADSL2+.
Likely Investors Reviewing GNZ Proposal
---------------------------------------
¶7. (U) An internal report (Castalia consultants) commissioned by
the three largest telecommunications firms in NZ - Telecom, Vodafone
and TelstraClear - said their own investment plans would deliver
broadband speeds adequate for the needs of everyday internet users
without the need for a boost from the Government. Castalia
challenged the belief that high broadband speeds for households - up
to 50 times faster than what is presently available - would deliver
significant economic benefits.
¶8. (U) Telecom (largest NZ telecommunication firm) has set up an
internal "think tank" to formulate its response to the Government's
NZ$1.5 billion plan. Sources suggest there is still internal debate
within Telecom about the implications of the government plan.
"Telecom will be reviewing the opportunities the initiative presents
to work with the proposed CFIC to extend the reach of Telecom's own
ultra-fast broadband network, and to utilize the fiber networks
others may build," said chief executive Paul Reynolds. Reynolds
further opined that Telecom "looked forward to working with
government funding to complement the government's plans to take fast
broadband even further, including to those areas that currently are
not commercially viable." Telecom's current share of the retail
broadband market has slipped to 57 percent, down from 61 per cent in
¶2007.
¶9. (U) In addition to the traditional telecommunication firms
considering the CFIC's offer, Auckland-based Vector Energy is also
likely to be a prime candidate to join up with the new investment
company CFIC in rolling out fiber optic cables to homes and
businesses. Vector currently has 500km of fiber optic network laid
in Auckland's business districts and is expanding that network by an
extra 300km as part of an agreement with Vodafone.
Endorsements
------------
¶10. (U) Much of the GNZ's current CFIC plan was based on a March
2008 study by the Auckland-based New Zealand Institute entitled,
"Assessing New Zealand's Current Broadband Path: The Need for
Change." The NZ Institute concluded that the current state of NZ
broadband was insufficient. The NZ Institute maintained that the
announced investment by the major telecoms would not take NZ far
enough fast enough. Despite the dominant investor (Telecom) making
significant investments in fiber-optic, it had insufficient
commercial incentive to roll it out rapidly. Finally, the longer NZ
took to roll out its fiber-optic upgrade, the more costly it would
become thus shutting out all but the major urban centers.
¶11. (U) CFIC's plans have been favorably welcomed by the
Telecommunications Users Association, TUANZ. "The Minister's paper
is at the top end of our expectations," said TUANZ's chief executive
Ernie Newman. "It sets out a clear structure for the proposed
partnerships, and will give potential partners in the private sector
all the information they need to come up with regionally-based
proposals." Newman said the plan appeared to be "sector-neutral" -
meaning it opened the way for a wide range of potential co-investors
including telecommunications companies, power line companies, or
regional groupings. This was important, said Newman, as a greater
diversity of investors were "showing their hands and broadening the
range of innovative, cost-effective solutions."
Criticism of the Plan
---------------------
WELLINGTON 00000102 003.2 OF 003
¶12. (U) Labour Party's Finance spokesman David Cunliffe accused the
Government of "performing a NZ$1.5 billion back flip." He said the
scheme largely mirrored the approach of Labour's NZ$325 million
Broadband Investment Fund (BIF), which the Government scrapped, but
was more wasteful of taxpayers' dollars. Minister Joyce responded,
saying the Government's plan differed from Labour's in three key
respects: its sheer size, the Government's investment in fiber
providers instead of handing out subsidies, and its focus on fiber
to the home, rather than a mix of other technologies such as
wireless and/or satellite broadband.
¶13. (U) The Government conceded that there was a risk that private
investors might not come forward with their share of the NZ$3
billion, that this might not be enough to provide the desired
network coverage, and that local fiber companies might fail. Laws
might be changed to make it easier for contractors to string cables
on power and telephone poles, and to lay fiber in "micro-trenches"
cut in roads. Tim Davin, policy manager at the Institute for
Professional Engineers, said 25,000 kilometers of cabling would be
needed. New Zealand did not have enough trained engineers to build
the network, but some could be brought in from overseas, he said.
Comment
-------
¶14. (SBU) Despite the contested nature of the high-speed broadband
debate, most seem to agree that the best way forward for NZ is
through the Government's proposed collaborative approach. There are
a number of technical issues yet to be worked through and engaging
with the country's major telecoms will help the GNZ to form a
clearer roadmap towards developing an effective plan for the
proposed NZ$1.5 billion in spending. The GNZ's commitment to invest
in New Zealand's broadband infrastructure clearly demonstrates the
importance the National-led government attaches to state-of-the art
information and communication technologies (ICT) as an enabler of
business and a driver of international competitiveness. To date,
too much of the broadband debate in NZ has focused on the "last
mile" of infrastructure and centered on broadband access alone.
Faster broadband will eventually encourage developments in areas
such as eHealth (real time remote healthcare monitoring and
diagnosis) and education through improved research and
communications technologies and enhanced distance learning - all of
which were National Party campaign promises. End Comment.
KEEGAN