

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09STATE97946, DEPLOYMENTS OF U.S. SPECIAL FORCES IN PARAGUAY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09STATE97946.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09STATE97946 | 2009-09-21 20:51 | 2011-04-06 00:00 | SECRET//NOFORN | Secretary of State |
VZCZCXYZ0002
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHC #7946 2642111
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
P 212051Z SEP 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION PRIORITY 0000
INFO RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/JOINT STAFF WASHINTON DC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/USSOCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
S E C R E T STATE 097946
NOFORN, SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/13/2029
TAGS: MASS PA PGOV PM PREL
SUBJECT: DEPLOYMENTS OF U.S. SPECIAL FORCES IN PARAGUAY
REFS: A) ASUNCION 426 B)ASUNCION 418
Classified By: Assistant Secretary, Thomas A. Shannon;
Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
¶1. (U) This is an action message. See paragraph
eight.
¶2. (S/NF) SUMMARY: Since 2006, U.S. Special Forces
Operational Detachment Alpha (ODA) has been engaged in
equipping and training Paraguay's Joint Special Forces
Unit (BCFE) with the implicit support of the government
of Paraguay (including pursuant to Section 1208 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for FY05, as
amended). Although the Lugo administration in Paraguay
has expressed interest in strengthening our mil/mil
relationship in the long term, the GOP wants to put
further assistance from the Special Forces ODA on hold
at the conclusion of the training in September.
According to Special Operations Component, U.S. Southern
Command (SOCSOUTH), key mission objectives have been
accomplished to the extent possible, and USSOUTHCOM
plans to terminate this phase of the effort at the end
of the fiscal year. By mutual agreement between the USG
and the GOP, the members of the U.S. Special Forces ODA
unit engaged in training and equipping the BCFE will
depart Paraguay at the end of September, when the
training of the BCFE ends. Two Special Operations
Command, Forward (SOCFWD) personnel will remain in
Paraguay to monitor the transition of Section 1208-
funded equipment to the GOP. SOCSOUTH plans to deploy a
short-term TDY 12-person ODA team in the third quarter
of FY2010 to evaluate the consolidation of the BCFE and
reinforce its capabilities. The Department recognizes
the need to move forward to plan this deployment, but
requests post consult with the Department closer to the
actual deployment date before granting final country
clearance. DoD is aware of the Department's concerns
and will consult with us as we get closer to the event
regarding the feasibility of a deployment in the third
quarter of FY10. Upon receipt of additional, detailed
guidance, Post should be prepared to initiate
discussions with the GOP to obtain written legal
protection from the GOP for U.S. forces for any future
activity. End Summary.
---------------------------------
STATUS OF U.S. FORCES IN PARAGUAY
---------------------------------
¶3. (S/NF) Since 2006, the U.S. government has invested
significant resources to help establish, train, and
equip
Paraguay's new rapid reaction force (BCFE); has
supported the creation of a Paraguayan-flagged
peacekeeping unit under the Global Peace Operations
Initiative; and has implemented well-received
humanitarian assistance projects. We understand from
post that there are currently 21 long-term TDY DOD staff
positions in Paraguay that are not covered under
diplomatic or administrative and technical staff status,
including the six-member Special Forces ODA working with
the BCFE, a four-person MIST team, a six-person civil-
military support element (CMSE) for humanitarian
projects, and five Special Operations Command Forward
Headquarters (SOCFWD-HQ) staff. Six members of the ODA
team and three members of the SOCFWD-HQ are scheduled to
depart Paraguay by the end of September. SOCSOUTH plans
to deploy a 12-person ODA team in the third quarter of
FY2010 for a short-term TDY to provide follow-up
training and evaluation of the BCFE.
---------------------------------------
GOP POSITION ON US MILITARY COOPERATION
---------------------------------------
¶4. (S/NF) Ambassador Ayalde has repeatedly sought
clarification from the new GOP administration regarding
its position on U.S. military cooperation in Paraguay.
President Lugo has expressed support for
strengthening the relationship and values the
operational capacity of the newly trained BCFE.
Nonetheless, the GOP has been reluctant to provide a
written request for assistance or to provide in writing
status protections for U.S. military personnel not
accredited to the Embassy. In a June 30 meeting between
the Ambassador and Lugo, President Lugo noted that the
Minister of Defense had objections to U.S. military
cooperation. Lugo said he would meet with the MOD and
others and promised to provide greater clarity on the
GOP's intentions (REF B: ASUNCION 418).
¶5. (S/NF) On July 7, 2009, the Foreign Minister
requested a meeting with the Charge to inform him of the
GOP's decision to suspend any subsequent USG assistance
to the BCFE at the end of the current training in
September (REF A: ASUNCION 426). The Foreign Minister
said the GOP is interested in deepening our mil-mil
relationship, but that it needed a break ("un pequeno
descanso") to mark a shift from the past administration.
In the meeting, the Foreign Minister said the continued
presence of significant numbers of U.S. security forces
in Paraguay without the explicit and public agreement of
the GOP is a potential political liability for both the
United States and the GOP. Nevertheless, he stated that
other Special Operations units currently in Paraguay - a
civil-military support element, a MIST team, and the
SOCFWD-PY headquarters team working out of the Embassy -
are welcome to stay. By mutual agreement between the
USG and the GOP, the members of the U.S. Special Forces
ODA unit engaged in training and equipping the BCFE will
depart Paraguay in September at the conclusion of the
training. The Foreign Minister also said that President
Lugo intends to conclude a "security cooperation
agreement" with the USG before the end of the year.
Such an agreement, he said, would cover the entire range
of engagements and cooperation between the two
militaries. We note, however, this is not the first
such commitment the GOP has made, and the GOP, to date,
has not provided any details on what it proposes. Also,
there has been no authority granted pursuant to Circular
175 procedures to negotiate such an agreement on behalf
of the United States.
-----------------
POLITICAL CONTEXT
-----------------
¶6. (S/NF) One year into office, President Lugo is
confronted by the reality of governing with a fractured
ruling coalition, an antagonistic Congress, and
entrenched systemic corruption. Lugo has proven
resilient, and thus far has weathered deliberate
destabilization efforts that included a wave of small
explosive devices and bomb threats in Asuncion.
Nevertheless, rumors of coup-plotting persist along with
a continual erosion of Lugo's political capital. Given
the current environment and the absence of written
status protections for all DoD personnel in Paraguay,
their presence poses a potential political risk. At any
point, those who oppose Lugo or merely wish to weaken
his ties to the United States may publicly raise the
issue of U.S. forces in Paraguay and speculate about
their role in a way that undercuts U.S. interests. In
addition, there is a potential personal risk to U.S.
forces on training missions in Paraguay without the
benefit of status protections or equivalent.
-----------------
REGIONAL CONCERNS
-----------------
¶7. (S/NF) Recent reaction to the proposed U.S.
military presence in Colombia, as well as previous
concerns about the U.S. Fourth Fleet and false rumors
about U.S. military bases in Paraguay, underscore the
need to evaluate not only the bilateral implications of
our military relationship with Paraguay, but the
regional context as well. The SOCSOUTH engagement in
Paraguay over the past few years has successfully
increased the GOP capacity to respond to threats,
particularly those related to the Tri-Border area.
Although it is important to continue to work with
Paraguay and maintain the successful relationships that
have been built, regional political sensibilities must
be considered as we look to the future of our military
engagement with Paraguay. The long-term presence of
significant numbers of U.S. Special Forces in Paraguay
could engender negative regional reactions that would
undermine regional policy objectives. Continued
dialogue between the Department of State and Department
of Defense on how we engage the Lugo administration on
military cooperation is critical to striking the right
balance.
--------------
ACTION REQUEST
--------------
¶8. (S/NF) The Department of State understands the
remaining members of the SOCFWD-PY ODA training team
will depart post by September 30, 2009. In addition,
the Department of State is aware SOCSOUTH tentatively
plans to deploy a 12-person ODA team in the third
quarter of FY2010 for a short-term TDY to provide
follow-up training and evaluation of the BCFE. The
Department of State recognizes the need for SOCSOUTH to
plan for this deployment in advance.
¶9. (S/NF) There are clear advantages for moving
forward with the deployment if the risks are not too
great. But there is some risk that in the current
political environment in which the presence of U.S.
forces in Colombia is being publicly criticized by some
governments, disclosure by a third country government of
the presence of U.S. forces along with misinformation or
mischaracterization could damage our future ability to
engage in mil-mil cooperation with Paraguay or with
others in the region. Due to the aforementioned USG and
GOP concerns and the importance of evaluating the
regional political situation closer to the time of
actual deployment, the Department of State requests post
consult with the Department prior to granting country
clearance to this and future ODA deployments. Country
clearance should be considered as close to the actual
deployment date as possible, but no less than two months
prior to the deployment. The Department of State also
strongly encourages post to make the GOP aware of the
need for written status-of-forces protections for future
deployments of DoD personnel and to begin preparing the
GOP for eventual discussions regarding a status-of-
forces agreement, once the regional situation lends
itself to such an agreement, and once authority to
negotiate such an agreement on behalf of the United
States is granted pursuant to Circular 175 procedures.
Post should note that such status protection agreements
may involve several months of work both within the
interagency and with the host nation, and should begin
working with USSOUTHCOM approximately six months in
advance of the proposed deployment to ensure necessary
protections can be obtained.
CLINTON