

Currently released so far... 12553 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
APECO
ASEC
AMGT
AFIN
APER
ACABQ
AORC
AEMR
AF
AE
AR
AGMT
AU
AY
ABLD
AS
AG
AJ
APCS
AX
AM
AMEX
ATRN
ADM
AMED
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AL
ASUP
AND
ARM
ASEAN
AFFAIRS
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AODE
APEC
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AO
ABUD
AC
ADPM
ADCO
ASIG
ARF
AUC
ASEX
AGAO
AA
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
AIT
AADP
ASCH
AORL
AROC
ACOA
ANET
AID
AMCHAMS
AINF
AMG
AFU
AN
ALOW
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ACS
ADANA
AECL
ACAO
AORG
AGR
BEXP
BR
BM
BG
BL
BA
BTIO
BO
BP
BC
BILAT
BK
BU
BD
BRUSSELS
BB
BF
BBSR
BIDEN
BX
BE
BH
BT
BY
BMGT
BWC
BTIU
BN
CA
CASC
CFED
CO
CH
CS
CU
CE
CI
CM
CMGT
CJAN
COM
CG
CIS
CVIS
CR
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTER
CIA
CLINTON
CY
CPAS
CD
CBW
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CDG
CW
CODEL
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
COE
CN
CARICOM
CB
CONDOLEEZZA
CWC
CACS
CSW
CIDA
CIC
CITT
CONS
CL
CACM
CDB
CDC
CAN
CF
CJUS
CTM
CBSA
CARSON
CT
CLMT
CBC
CEUDA
CV
COPUOS
CTR
CROS
CAPC
CAC
CNARC
CICTE
CBE
ECON
ETRD
EIND
ENRG
EC
ELAB
EAGR
EAID
EFIS
EFIN
EINV
EUN
EG
EPET
EAIR
EU
ELTN
EWWT
ECIN
ERD
EI
ETTC
EUR
EN
EZ
ETC
ENVI
EMIN
ET
ENVR
ER
ECPS
EINT
EAP
ES
ENIV
ECONOMY
EXTERNAL
EINN
EFTA
ECONOMIC
EPA
EXBS
ECA
ELN
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENGR
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
EIAR
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
ENERG
EFIM
EAIDS
EK
ETRDECONWTOCS
EINVETC
ECONCS
EUNCH
ESA
ECINECONCS
EUREM
ESENV
EFINECONCS
ETRC
ENNP
EAIG
EXIM
EEPET
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
ERNG
ETRO
ETRN
EINVEFIN
ICTY
IN
IS
IR
IC
IZ
IA
INTERPOL
IAEA
IT
IMO
IO
IV
ID
IRAQI
IEA
INRB
IL
IWC
ITU
ICAO
ISRAELI
ICRC
IIP
IMF
IBRD
ISLAMISTS
ITALY
ITALIAN
ILO
IPR
IQ
IRS
IAHRC
IZPREL
IRAJ
IDP
ILC
ITF
ICJ
IF
ITPHUM
INMARSAT
ISRAEL
IACI
IBET
ITRA
INR
IRC
IDA
ICTR
IGAD
INRA
INRO
IEFIN
INTELSAT
INTERNAL
INDO
ITPGOV
KWMN
KSCA
KDEM
KTFN
KIPR
KCRM
KPAL
KE
KPAO
KPKO
KS
KN
KISL
KFRD
KJUS
KIRF
KFLO
KG
KTIP
KTER
KRCM
KTIA
KGHG
KIRC
KU
KPRP
KMCA
KMPI
KSEO
KNNP
KZ
KNEI
KCOR
KOMC
KCFC
KSTC
KMDR
KFLU
KSAF
KSEP
KSAC
KR
KGIC
KSUM
KWBG
KCIP
KDRG
KOLY
KAWC
KCHG
KHDP
KRVC
KBIO
KAWK
KGCC
KHLS
KBCT
KPLS
KREL
KCFE
KMFO
KV
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KVPR
KTDB
KSPR
KIDE
KVRP
KTEX
KBTR
KTRD
KICC
KCOM
KO
KLIG
KDEMAF
KMRS
KRAD
KOCI
KSTH
KUNR
KNSD
KGIT
KFSC
KHIV
KPAI
KICA
KACT
KHUM
KREC
KSEC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCMR
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KNAR
KNUC
KPWR
KENV
KWWMN
KWMNCS
KPRV
KOM
KBTS
KCRS
KNPP
KWNM
KRFD
KVIR
KTBT
KAID
KRIM
KDDG
KRGY
KHSA
KWMM
KMOC
KSCI
KPAK
KX
KPAONZ
KCGC
KID
KPOA
KIFR
KFIN
KWAC
KOMS
KCRCM
KNUP
KMIG
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KTLA
KCSY
KJUST
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MNUC
MX
MCAP
MO
MR
MI
MD
MK
MA
MP
MY
MTCRE
MOPPS
MASC
MIL
MTS
MLS
MILI
MAR
MU
MEPN
MAPP
MTCR
MEPI
MZ
MEETINGS
MG
MW
MAS
MT
MCC
MIK
ML
MARAD
MV
MERCOSUR
MTRE
MPOS
MEPP
MILITARY
MDC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MRCRE
MAPS
MEDIA
MASSMNUC
MC
NZ
NZUS
NL
NU
NATO
NP
NO
NIPP
NE
NH
NR
NA
NPT
NI
NSF
NG
NSG
NAFTA
NC
NDP
NEW
NRR
NATIONAL
NT
NS
NASA
NAR
NV
NORAD
NSSP
NK
NPA
NGO
NSC
NATOPREL
NW
NPG
NSFO
OPDC
OTRA
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OSCE
OEXC
OIE
OPRC
OAS
OPIC
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OFFICIALS
OECD
OSCI
OBSP
OFDA
OPCW
ODIP
OFDP
OES
OPAD
OCII
OHUM
OVP
ON
OIC
OCS
PHUM
PREL
PGOV
PINR
PTER
PARM
PREF
PM
PE
PINS
PK
PHSA
PBTS
PRGOV
PA
PORG
PP
PS
PGOF
PL
PO
PARMS
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PAK
POL
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PREFA
PALESTINIAN
PBIO
PINF
PNG
PMIL
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PAO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PTBS
PCUL
PROP
PNAT
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PROG
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
PGOC
PY
PCI
PLN
PDOV
PREO
PGIV
PHUH
PAS
PU
POGOV
PF
PINL
POV
PAHO
PRL
PG
PRAM
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POLICY
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGGV
PHUS
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PEL
PSI
PAIGH
POSTS
PBT
PTERE
RS
RU
RW
RM
RO
RP
REGION
RSP
RF
RICE
RCMP
RFE
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
RUPREL
RELATIONS
ROOD
REACTION
RSO
REPORT
SENV
SNAR
SCUL
SR
SC
SOCI
SMIG
SI
SP
SU
SO
SW
SY
SA
SZ
SAN
SF
SN
STEINBERG
SG
ST
SIPDIS
SNARIZ
SNARN
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SAARC
SL
SEVN
SARS
SIPRS
SHUM
SANC
SWE
SHI
SYR
SNARCS
SPCE
SYRIA
SEN
SH
SCRS
SENVKGHG
TRGY
TSPL
TPHY
TSPA
TBIO
TI
TW
THPY
TX
TU
TS
TZ
TC
TH
TT
TIP
TO
TERRORISM
TRSY
TINT
TN
TURKEY
TBID
TL
TV
TNGD
TD
TF
TP
TFIN
TAGS
TK
TR
UNSC
UK
UNGA
UN
US
UNHRC
UG
UP
UNMIK
UNHCR
UE
USTR
UNVIE
UAE
UZ
UY
UNO
UNESCO
USEU
USOAS
UV
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNEP
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNDP
UNPUOS
UNC
UNAUS
USUN
UNCHC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNICEF
UNCSD
UNDC
USNC
USPS
USAID
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06HELSINKI1248, FINLAND: NATO DEBATE HEATS UP
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06HELSINKI1248.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06HELSINKI1248 | 2006-12-19 13:12 | 2011-04-24 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Helsinki |
VZCZCXRO8856
RR RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ RUEHROV
DE RUEHHE #1248/01 3531312
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 191312Z DEC 06
FM AMEMBASSY HELSINKI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2840
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO 4661
RUEHRK/AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK 0268
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 0929
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HELSINKI 001248
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PGOV MOPS MARR EUN RU FI
SUBJECT: FINLAND: NATO DEBATE HEATS UP
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The March 2007 parliamentary election
campaign is about to kick off and NATO is emerging as a key
theme, just as it did in the January 2006 presidential
elections -- and despite the efforts of several prominent
politicians to muzzle public debate on this sensitive topic.
This cable offers a snapshot of the current NATO debate in
Finland, and subsequent reporting will examine the impact of
NATO and security issues on both the elections and the new
government that emerges. End Summary
Background: Is NATO Still the Political Kiss of Death?
--------------------------------------------- ---------
¶2. (SBU) Finland's general Parliamentary elections are four
months away (March 2007). As the election looms closer, the
question of whether Finland should accede to NATO is
generating renewed public interest and debate. President
Tarja Halonen was re-elected in January by a surprisingly
thin
margin over her Conservative Party challenger, Sauli Niinsto.
Security policy -- and especially the NATO issue -- played a
significant role in the presidential campaign. Halonen, a
Social Democrat (SDP), had long opposed joining NATO and had
expressed similar reservations about European Security and
Defense Policy (ESDP) planning. (At one point, she suggested
that no EU military operations could be legitimate or
justified in the absence of UN authorization, but
subsequently
moderated that stance.) Niinsto stopped short of advocating
outright NATO accession, but his positive comments about
possible future membership and his support for greater
regional and international engagement by Finland were widely
interpreted as de facto support for accession sooner rather
than later.
¶3. (SBU) Pundits in Finland have long predicted that public
support for NATO membership would be the kiss of death for
any
Finnish politician, and that debate rages on as the
Parliamentary contests approach. With Niinisto almost having
pulled off an upset, many now argue that his outspoken stance
on security policy may have been the issue that separated him
from Halonen and others and captured the imagination of
voters. Those same voices hold that although Halonen won,
her
poorer than expected showing resulted in part from a
perception that her idealism was coloring her foreign policy
judgment too much and leading to unrealistic "ivory tower"
policies that risked isolating Finland from the European
mainstream. However, others -- including leading
Conservative
Party strategists -- tell us that NATO and security policies
actually were the kiss of death for Niinisto. In their
version, had he not been so forward leaning in these areas,
he
would have picked up the additional 2.5 percentage points he
needed and toppled Halonen. In particular, Conservatives now
say, Finnish Center Party voters, who favored many of
Niinisto's other arguments, remained staunchly opposed to
NATO
membership and reacted to Niinisto's NATO arguments either by
voting for Halonen or by staying home. Opinion polls still
show a large majority of Finns opposed to NATO membership,
but
opposition remains especially high among the largely rural
voters who make up the vast majority of the Center Party's
base. One final factor, according to both our Center and
Conservative Party contacts, was the overwhelming and still
passionate opposition to the US invasion of Iraq. Although
polls indicated that most Finns believed NATO membership
should remain a viable option, and that Finland would
inevitably accede at some point, they still link NATO to the
US, and the war remains a factor in voters' calculations.
The Press Kicks Off This Season's Debate
----------------------------------------
¶4. (SBU) Campaign season for the March 2007 contests does not
even begin until January 1, but Finland's press corps kicked
things off in October when Finland's two largest newspapers
--
the Helsingin Sanomat (Helsinki) and Aamulehti (Tampere) --
ran their first-ever editorials officially advocating NATO
accession for Finland. The two big dailies were followed
quickly by several smaller publications. The newspapers'
argument for accession was based on the fact that Finland is
an active participant in NATO operations in Afghanistan, the
Balkans, and elsewhere but that regardless of what shape or
form an enhanced NATO partnership might take after the Riga
Summit, lack of full membership would relegate Finland to
continued second-class citizen status -- without the role in
HELSINKI 00001248 002 OF 003
decision-making, operational planning, and intelligence-
sharing that the country desires. A secondary theme that was
addressed obliquely was renewed concern over Russia. Finnish
politicians and journalists alike are cautious when alluding
to any possible threat from the Russian bear, and concerns
about Russian backsliding on human rights and democracy are
not the driving force behind the current debate; however, a
level of concern about recent trends in Moscow is always a
hidden subtext in any Finnish debate on security policy.
Lipponen and Kaariainen Square Off
----------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) Hard on the heels of the editorial staffs, two of
Finland's most prominent politicians -- one historically pro-
NATO, the other a staunch opponent -- weighed in publicly.
Social Democratic (SDP) Speaker of Parliament Paavo Lipponen,
the longtime advocate, said that Finland would be hard
pressed
to defend itself in the future without help from NATO.
However, Lipponen also knows that NATO is not a winning issue
for his Social Democratic party, largely because its other
heavy hitters -- namely President Halonen and Foreign
Minister
Erkki Tuomioja -- strongly oppose Finland's joining NATO.
For
that reason, while holding true to his convictions, Lipponen
also tried to pre-empt a discussion of NATO during this
campaign, suggesting that the real debate should wait until
after the 2007 elections. Then, possibly, a more NATO-
friendly Parliament might be seated, and leading NATO
detractors like Foreign Minister Erkki Tuomioja (SDP) and
Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen (who is constrained by his
Center Party constituency) might be removed to less powerful
roles.
¶6. (SBU) Lipponen's remarks were followed by those of Defense
Minister Seppo Kaariainen (Center Party), who told
journalists
that by 2020, Finland would be unable to maintain its current
system of territorial defense without large increases in
shrinking defense budgets or NATO membership. Kaariainen's
comments were initially noteworthy, because he has never
favored NATO accession and generally shied away from entering
the public fray. They also prompted immediate attacks. FM
Tuomioja blasted the DefMin for "threatening" the GoF with
the
inevitability of NATO membership. Although Tuomioja didn't
use the word "blackmail," the gist of his remarks was that
Kaariainen was indeed blackmailing the government for greater
defense expenditures by presenting NATO as the only option in
the absence of bigger budgets for the military. The FM said
that joining NATO was a political issue, not an economic one;
and could not be made on the basis of budgetary
considerations
alone. President Halonen predictably seconded Tuomioja's
position saying there was no need for Finland to join NATO,
no
need for further debate at the present time, and no plans for
the GoF to revisit the issue in the near future. PM Matti
Vanhanen (who is a committed trans-Atlanticist but knows he
stands to gain nothing from his own base by favoring NATO
membership) initially stayed clear of the public sparring,
but
later showed solidarity with the FM and President, declaring
that NATO issues should not be discussed during the campaign.
Lesser political luminaries such as former communist Jaako
Lakso, an outspoken member of Parliament from the Left
Alliance, also added their voices to those decrying
Kaariainen's assessment.
¶7. (SBU) Kaariainen and Lipponen did not respond publicly to
any of the commotion; but sources from across the political
spectrum now tell us that Kaariainen's gambit, in particular,
was never intended as a show of support for Finland's NATO
accession. Instead, they said, it was a clever means of
allowing others such as Halonen and Tuomioja to publicly shut
down the NATO debate. Liisa Jaakonsaari, the SDP chair of
Parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee (and, like Lipponen, a
strong supporter of NATO membership, was unusually harsh in
her public criticism of the GoF's position -- especially that
of Halonen -- and she was furious with Kaariainen.
Jaakonsaari lamented in particularly the fact that
Kaariainen's response seemed designed to allow Halonen and
others to cut off all debate on the subject. As another MP
put it, Kaariainen "certainly hasn't changed his tune on
NATO,
he just wants a bigger defense budget." Max Jakobson,
Finland's most respected ex-diplomat and foreign policy "grey
eminence," also spoke out against the government's negative
HELSINKI 00001248 003 OF 003
assessment and attempt to close down the dialogue. The
career
minister said that it was unfortunate the GoF was trying to
"close the door" on NATO membership for the foreseeable
future
and implied that some NATO membership opponents were afraid
of
an open debate about accession.
Even the Bear Growls
--------------------
¶8. (SBU) Not to be left out, Russian officials took advantage
of the opportunity to register their interest. Russia's
ambassador to Finland said that Moscow was "satisfied" with
what he described as "Finland's clearly stated policy" to not
apply for membership in the near future. The visiting Chief
of the Russian General Staff went somewhat further; speaking
at a Helsinki press conference alongside his Finnish
counterpart, the general opined that Finland should consider
"the consequences of joining the alliance" on the Finnish-
Russian bilateral relationship. He referred to the Baltic
states as having been turned into "worrying gray areas" by
their decision to join NATO.
Comment
-------
¶9. (SBU) If nothing else, the NATO and security policy debate
promises to be a major theme in the upcoming parliamentary
campaign, despite the efforts of several senior politicians
to
muzzle it. We will follow it closely and, on the public
diplomacy side, continue to do our part to dispel rumors,
correct misimpressions and simply offer the facts regarding
the US position. Subsequent reporting will examine how the
campaign and the election results will impact the Finnish
NATO
debate going forward.
WARE