

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA822, AUTO AND AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING INVESTMENT:
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA822.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA822 | 2005-03-18 18:38 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000822
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA/CAN - BREESE
AND HOLST STATE PASS USTR FOR CHANDLER
USDOC FOR 4320/OFFICE OF NAFTA/GWORD/TFOX; 3134/OIO/WESTERN
HEMISPHERE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD EIND EINV CA
SUBJECT: AUTO AND AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING INVESTMENT:
CANADIAN GOVERNMENTS REJOIN THE SUBSIDY GAME
REF: (A) TORONTO 0430 (C) 04 TORONTO 0786
(B) TORONTO 0264 (D) CALGARY 068
SUMMARY/INTRODUCTION
--------------------
¶1. The GOC and the provincial government of Ontario will
contribute hundreds of millions of dollars toward
investments announced recently in central Canada's auto
plants. The federal, Quebec and Ontario governments
are also offering large new incentives to the aerospace
industry. This marks a significant return to the
industrial subsidies game by Canadian governments,
after a bipartisan trend toward more market-based
policies since 1984 (and a tough bout of deficit- fighting
since 1995).
¶2. In large part, these subsidy decisions reflect continued
competition among North American and European jurisdictions
for major auto and aerospace investments. (It bears noting
that U.S.- based firms, such as GM, Ford, and Pratt & Whitney,
are top beneficiaries of Canada's industrial incentives).
However, governments are also responding to anxiety
about Canada's manufacturing competitiveness, which is
fostered by several trends:
-- Canada's recently declining share of North American auto
manufacturing, as new plants locate increasingly southward;
-- Post- 2001 slumps in aerospace and information technology
exports;
-- Concerns about backsliding toward being an exporter of
energy, forest products and minerals, after decades of
struggle to increase the proportion of higher-value-added
exports;
-- The uncertainties faced by intensive users of the
U.S.-Canada border (a problem codified by Industry
Minister David Emerson as "border risk"), which are
thought to be deterring some foreign direct investment;
and
-- The appreciation in the value of the Canadian dollar
since early 2003.
END SUMMARY/INTRODUCTION
THE ANNOUNCEMENTS
-----------------
¶3. Ontario provincial funds are provided through the
"Ontario Automotive Investment Strategy" which was
unveiled in April 2004 with funding of C$500 million
(US$400 million) (ref A). GOC funds are provided
mainly through Industry Canada (notably a program
called Technology Partnerships Canada - TPC) and also
through Human Resources and Skills Development Canada.
The TPC fund provides funding for corporate research
and development which is nominally repayable if
products succeed commercially. In practice, TPC mainly
funds the aerospace industry and little is repaid. The
WTO-consistency of TPC's precursor was successfully
challenged in the mid-1990's by Brazil's Embraer, which
competes directly in the jet aircraft market with
Canada's Bombardier, and that dispute prompted the
program's reinvention as TPC.
¶4. AUTOS: On March 2, flanked by representatives of the
federal and Ontario governments, General Motors of Canada
Limited announced the "Beacon Project" -- C$2.5 billion
(about US$2 billion) in investments in its Canadian
facilities. Beacon will draw C$235 million in funds from
Ontario and C$200 million from the GOC. In November 2004,
Ford Motor Co. of Canada announced that it would receive
C$100 million from Ontario and a similar amount from the GOC
to redevelop its operations. DaimlerChrysler is reportedly
planning an auto plant investment which would also draw
government support. The key target for governments is a
possible investment by Toyota in a new assembly plant in
Ontario, which has not attracted a new auto plant in more
than a decade (ref C).
¶5. AIRCRAFT: TPC's single largest beneficiary is Pratt
& Whitney Canada Inc., which has received some C$500
million (US$400 million) from TPC. On January 13,
2005, the GOC announced a further C$207 million in TPC
funding for Pratt & Whitney to support various
aerospace research and development programs. On
February 22 the GOC announced C$115 million in TPC
funding for Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited.
Meanwhile, Bombardier, the world's third largest
aircraft maker after Boeing and Airbus, is playing
Canadian and British jurisdictions against each other
to manufacture its new C Series jet. The GOC, Quebec
and Ontario have all pledged hundreds of millions in
support. Bombardier is based in the Montreal area,
like Pratt & Whitney and Bell Helicopter, but it has
some facilities in Ontario which stand to win C Series
contracts.
EXPORT TRENDS: BACK TO LOGS AND ROCKS?
---------------------------------------
¶6. Canada's development was driven by successive waves of
natural resource extraction (fish, fur, timber, grain,
minerals, energy). A core mandate of Canada's trade and
industrial policies has always been to reduce this reliance
on natural resource-based exports. From the 1890's onward
this was approached through high tariffs on imported
manufactures, but Canada shifted to a trade-liberalizing
policy for autos in the 1960's and for most other goods in
the 1980's. By the late 1990's the "value added" goal
seemed to have been reached. Canadians built more than
twice as many cars as they purchased, and they were
successfully exporting not only vehicles but jet aircraft
(by Bombardier), telecommunications systems (by Nortel) and
nuclear reactors (by AECL).
¶7. Since 2000, a number of factors combined to deflate
this success. Simultaneous worldwide slumps in both
telecoms and aviation hit Nortel and Bombardier hard (along
with many related firms), with sharp and sustained drops in
their exports.
¶8. With a lack of major new investments in the auto
sector, combined with the closing of some older facilities,
Canada's ratio of "vehicle production to sales" - a simple
indicator of export success - was slipping (it had peaked in
1995 at more than 2, but by 2003 it had fallen to 1.6).
Flattening investment in the auto sector, which could be
overlooked while Nortel and Bombardier were setting export
records, became a concern when they lost their sparkle.
¶9. Meanwhile, the Canadian dollar appreciated strongly
in 2003-04, from under 65 cents to over 80 cents U.S.,
sharply trimming the competitiveness of Canadian
exports in the U.S. market. Ontario policymakers view
this as a key cause of recent downgrades in the
province's growth outlook (ref A).
¶10. In this context, the impressive run-up in demand and
prices for energy, building materials and other commodities
over the past few years is a mixed blessing in Canada: good
for the resource hinterland, but bad for the manufacturing
heartland. Strong commodity demand has resource exports
booming in both value and volume. In just three years from
2001-2004, exports of oil and gas grew 49 percent; refined
petroleum products, 49 percent; iron and steel, 68 percent;
and wood panel products, 99 percent. But for manufacturers,
the resource boom has not only driven input costs upward,
but can also be seen as a major cause of the currency
appreciation that hurts them in both foreign and domestic
markets.
¶11. In the past two years, oil, gas and refined petroleum
products overtook finished motor vehicles as Canada's main
export category. While this is an amazing upset in terms of
Canada's development since World War II, it is partly
explained (at least for now) by price and currency
movements. But with foreign investment (including Asian
investor interest) in Canada's oilpatch on a strong upward
track (ref B), the reversal could threaten to last unless
investment in autos and aerospace makes a comeback.
COULD "BORDER RISK" KILL INVESTMENT?
------------------------------------
¶12. Canadian Industry Minister David Emerson, an economist
and former industry CEO, has fretted publicly about Canada's
trade-dependence and competitiveness since he joined the GOC
at the end of 2003. Emerson was quick to acknowledge that
the world had shifted since the heyday of the rules-based
trading system in the 1990's. "We were in Nirvana because
we were trade-dependent, more so than anybody else in the
world. All of these institutional arrangements that were
being set up were really quite nice for us. . . . The
balance is starting to shift - and it's shifting in
worrisome ways."
¶13. Referring to "creeping protectionism" in the United
States, Emerson says it has gradually defeated the dispute
resolution model. "We can be five, six, seven years out and
we're still paying the duties. We're still paying the
lumber duties today, and we're getting hit on beef, and
we're getting hit on pork . . . And then along comes 9/11. .
. You realize that today the border is back. The border is
back with a vengeance. It's not fading anymore. It's
become a fundamental source of risk. . . Think about global
supply chains. . . . You're going to make an investment that
is designed to serve the North American if not the world
market . . . If those investments are systematically and
continuously biased toward the United States because of
border risk, we've got some big, big problems in Canada."
¶14. Canadian media have been quick to apply Emerson's
analysis to Toyota's impending decision about where to
locate a new assembly plant - suggesting that Canada could
be knocked out of contention for this and other plum foreign
direct investments because of "border risk. Meanwhile,
while he stresses that assembly plants are the industry's
"anchors," Emerson recently expressed a willingness to
assist parts manufacturers as well.
POLICY RESPONSE: DIRECT SUBSIDIES
----------------------------------
¶15. Liberal Parties currently hold power in the GOC as well
as in Ontario and Quebec. According to observers who are
close to the auto sector, the willingness of these
governments to put large subsidies into the auto industry
reflects three factors:
-- An appreciation that Canada has done
disproportionately well in attracting auto industry
investment in the past, and in leveraging this
investment into broader economic strength, and that
this success is worth holding onto;
-- The numbers and concentration of votes represented
by auto and aerospace workers in politically critical
areas; and
-- A view that there is no alternative but to "play the
game" and compete with other jurisdictions (primarily
U.S. States but also overseas locations) for auto and
aerospace plants.
COMMENT
-------
¶16. Comment: In retrospect, Canadian federal and
provincial governments' retreat from "industrial policies"
during the 1990's appears to have been driven more by
deficit problems than by a permanent change in philosophy.
Certain industries - such as autos, aerospace, and the
"cultural" sectors - will continue to have a political claim
on public resources. If nothing else, the across-the-board
retreat provided an opportunity to push a few industries -
such as shipbuilding, textiles, footwear, and some
agriculture - out of the tent.
DICKSON