

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08BRUSSELS447, DHS ASSISTANT SECRETARY MEETS WITH EU COMMISSION
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08BRUSSELS447.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08BRUSSELS447 | 2008-03-26 10:47 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | USEU Brussels |
VZCZCXRO4863
RR RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ RUEHROV
DE RUEHBS #0447/01 0861047
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 261047Z MAR 08
FM USEU BRUSSELS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC
RHMFIUU/FBI WASHINGTON DC
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 BRUSSELS 000447
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
STATE FOR CA AND EUR
DHS FOR OIA
JUSTICE FOR OIA
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL CA CMGT CVIS EUN
SUBJECT: DHS ASSISTANT SECRETARY MEETS WITH EU COMMISSION
MARCH 14 ON U.S. VISA WAIVER PROGRAM
REF: A. BRUSSELS 00338
¶B. STATE 21769
¶C. BRUSSELS 00319
¶D. BRUSSELS 00309
¶E. BRUSSELS 00287
¶F. BRUSSELS 00268
¶G. STATE 11657
¶H. BRUSSELS 00172
¶1. (SBU) Summary. On March 14, 2008, Department of Homeland
Security Assistant Secretary for Policy Stewart Baker met in
Brussels with European Union Director General for Justice,
Freedom and Security (JLS) Jonathan Faull for a detailed
discussion of the implementation along twin tracks of the
U.S. Visa Waiver Program (VWP) modernization measures enacted
in August 2007 that form the basis of Memoranda of
Understanding (MOU) and related implementation arrangements
that DHS is pursuing with the member states. This discussion
came on the heels of the March 13 U.S.-EU JLS Troika
ministerial meeting in Slovenia where the VWP was also much
discussed and concluded in political level agreement to
pursue twin tracks whereby the U.S. will negotiate with
individual member states on matters of national authority
while consulting with EU institutions on matters of community
competence. The Brussels meeting was positive and
constructive and addressed all aspects of the VWP
Modernization Act. End Summary.
¶2. (SBU) Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary
for Policy Stewart Baker met in Brussels March 14 with
European Union Director General for Justice, Liberty and
Security (JLS) Jonathan Faull for a full discussion of the
current issues surrounding the MOUs to be agreed between DHS
and member states for participation in the VWP. A/S Baker
was accompanied to the meeting, which immediately followed a
private Baker-Faull lunch, by USEU representatives from
Department of Homeland Security, Department of State's Bureau
of Consular Affairs, and the Department of Justice, plus
visiting DOJ Privacy Officer Ken Mortensen. DG Faull was
joined by three JLS staff members (Telmo Baltazar, Luigi
Soreca and Jan de Cuester) plus current Slovene EU presidency
representative Andrej Grosjean. The almost two-hour meeting
was positive and constructive, and any areas of disagreement
were openly discussed.
¶3. (SBU) DG Faull opened with an explanation of his view that
the VWP issues need to proceed on both a short and long term
track. In the short term, the U.S. and EU must focus on what
needs to be done to get member states into the VWP, while in
the mid-to-long term, the U.S. and EU will need to tackle
issues such as interoperability between EU and US Passenger
Name Recognition (PNR) systems; how data can be exchanged
while observing privacy constraints and sorting out the EU
versus member state competencies. DG Faull emphasized the
need to implement the twin track approach agreed upon at the
Troika in Slovenia - e.g., the U.S. will proceed with member
states on issues within national authority while talking with
appropriate EU institutions on matters that are community
competency.
¶4. (SBU) A/S Baker expressed confidence both sides could
quickly move forward on the short term issues. He agreed to
the two track policy, noting DHS will let member states raise
gray areas resulting from our bilateral talks on VWP
implementing arrangements and allow member states and
Brussels to work out these issues before moving forward. A/S
Baker also clearly expressed interest in medium to long term
discussions on information sharing that might involve the
Schengen Information System II (SIS), the planned EU Visa
Information System (VIS), and the EU Eurodac, which logs
asylum seekers, recognizing that all of these would require
talks at the EU level. DG Faull agreed that it is "their
problem" to work out gray areas of competency within the "EU
family" while noting that access to EU systems is clearly a
community-level competency.
¶5. (SBU) On information sharing, DG Faull put down a marker
that member states do not "own" data in EU systems while
noting that neither VIS nor SIS II are implemented. He
further asserted that there may be far less national data in
the EU systems than DHS thinks. SIS II includes most but not
all member states (not Romania, Bulgaria, or Cyprus) plus
non-EU Schengen members (Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and
soon Liechtenstein). In addition, the UK and Ireland have
access to SIS/police and judicial information but not to the
BRUSSELS 00000447 002 OF 003
migration/border crossing information because they are not in
Schengen. Each Schengen member has its own NSIS (national
SIS). This is not evidence that a country owns the data - it
is merely a technological device that allows each member
state to interface with the overall system. Data collected
by member states enters the central SIS almost immediately
and, similarly, individual member states' alerts also enter
the NSIS database thereby creating a mix of data. DG Faull
said that it would be "illegal" for the U.S. to gather border
information from all Schengen members in an attempted end-run
of the EU competency. Comment: While it is clear that
SIS/Migration data is an EU competency, there are questions
as to whether SIS/criminal data is at the national or EU
level. Under the upcoming Lisbon Treaty it will clearly be
an EU competency but there may be currently a window of
opportunity to negotiate at the bilateral level. DG Faull
did note that intelligence sharing is clearly a member state
authority and that reciprocity will be an important issue on
all issues. End Comment.
¶6. (SBU) A/S Baker pledged to take DG Faull,s view into
account but stated that DHS will do its own research and
discuss with member states before conceding or agreeing
whether member states "own" data that they collect and
contribute to SIS. He further explained DHS interest in
getting access to visa, asylum, and border crossing
information and in particular referred to a pilot project
with the UK on asylum seekers. He asked for definition of
intelligence in EU context to which there is no transparent
answer; DG Faull responded that it is a question they do not
ask. A/S Baker stressed that reciprocity should be looked at
in its broadest sense - e.g., if DHS and member state "x"
agree to exchange data element "y," then DHS will make it
available to be put it in the equivalent of SIS. If membr
state "x" puts the data "y" into SIS then i is available to
all SIS users. We will needto discuss this. DG Faull agreed
this is an important point.
¶7. (SBU) In reference to the important U.S. - EU Passenger
Name Record (PNR) Agreement of 2007, governing flights
between the United States and the EU, A/S Baker confirmed
that DHS seeks no change to the PNR agreement, no additional
data, no change in retention periods, or any reopening at
all. He did clearly state a U.S. interest in passenger
information on flights between Europe to third countries,
noting the security vulnerability of having individuals who
travel on different passports to conceal their travel routes.
These questions will be raised in the bilateral VWP
implementing arrangements that DHS will seek with VWP
candidate countries. In some instances it will make sense to
ask for such information depending on the data available to
individual member states. A/S Baker confirmed that this
effort contemplates government-to-government sharing of data
and not working through private entities, such as airlines.
A/S Baker and DG Faull discussed dual nationals and whether
we should work together to get changes in passport standards
(ICAO or other means) to indicate whether a passport bearer
also has another country's passport.
¶8. (SBU) On the repatriation requirement under U.S. VWP law
and in the new VWP arrangements, A/S Baker acknowledged the
constructive explanation from the EU concerning its member
states' obligations under international law to accept
returned nationals; the EU has also developed a definition of
"former nationals" that may assist DHS and will be shared.
He allowed that DHS can probably make such references in any
implementing arrangements. A/S Baker further suggested there
is scope for the U.S. and EU to work together on the issue of
repatriation of nationals from difficult countries. DG Faull
noted the EU has similar problems. They agreed it is not a
good use of time to negotiate a U.S.- EU
repatriation/re-admission agreement because there is no need.
¶9. (SBU) Regarding the lost and stolen passport (LASP)
reporting requirement of the new VWP arrangements, A/S Baker
stated that Interpol is the preferred mechanism for
exchanging this information but it is not working fully and
he has some concerns about the reliability of the
information. First, not all countries have a 24/7 capacity
to respond with timely "hit" resolution information, and,
second, not all countries are reporting immediately to
Interpol. DG Faull commented that if the U.S. seeks
additional data elements, such as resolutions of losses, or
biometrics, be reported to Interpol, the Commission would
need to agree and undertake relevant changes to EU law. DG
BRUSSELS 00000447 003 OF 003
Faull explained that member states are responsible for
reporting lost/stolen passports and providing hit resolution,
this is not an EU responsibility. DG Faull noted some of the
current LASP problems are from the decentralized issuance of
passports in certain member states. A/S Baker asked if the
EU could validate which member states are efficient in
reporting and which are not. DG Faull responded that he
believed we will be able to work together on such areas of
concern. The U.S. side then proposed scheduling an
opportunity for USG experts to meet with the EU's lost/stolen
passport working group for an exchange of views and an update
since the last successful meeting in 2007.
¶10. (SBU) The two sides also discussed the new U.S.
Electronic Travel Authorization (ETA). A/S Baker
acknowledged the political sensitivity associated with the
term ETA for certain EU member states but reported the
preliminary DHS legal view is that the United States cannot
simply switch the program name to form alternative acronyms
like ESTA or ETAS. On substantive points, DG Faull expressed
two major concerns; first, if the ETA is a visa under another
name and, second, what data will be collected? In response,
A/S Baker went through the U.S. ETA talking points related to
fee, validity, and data elements. On data elements and the
limits of the information collected, the DHS team produced a
copy of the current I-94W and pointed to that as the near
entirety of the information that will be sought in an on-line
registration, although subsequent updates on specific travel
plans will be necessary. DG Faull acknowledged that if the
U.S. is already collecting this information, it would be
difficult for EU to mount objections. DG Faull also
expressed concern over questions regarding HIV and Nazi
membership. A/S Baker explained these derive from U.S.
immigration law (grounds of inadmissibility) and cannot be
removed, but he committed to having DHS attorneys take
another look.
¶11. (SBU) There was considerable discussion given to the
narrow window of opportunity in which to make progress on EU
member states qualifying for and implementing entry into the
VWP. A/S Baker explained front end triggers (ETA and 97%
biographic data air exit validation) and the June 30, 2009
back end trigger of DHS's deadline of a U.S. biometric exit
program. On air exit validation and the ETA, certification
must be made to Congress before the first new member country
is admitted to VWP. A/S Baker also acknowledged the
importance of terminology when referring to full
implementation of ETA - this is a term with special legal
meaning and consequences under the U.S. legislation. A/S
Baker also explained that DHS, with the help of the State
Department, will do outreach to both existing and new member
countries to explain what will be needed for entry to the
U.S. using an ETA.
12, (SBU) Discussing next steps, DG Faull explained that he
believed the Commission will present to the Council of
Permanent Representatives March 18 a request for a
negotiation mandate which would help clarify EU versus member
state competencies. He stated that this mandate may be
nothing more than an insurance policy. A/S Baker pushed back
hard, urging careful consideration and warning that acting
too swiftly would just require amendments down the road. DG
Faull said they needed to proceed because the agreement is to
work on twin tracks and thus the EU needs to be ready to move
as the need arises. The Council Presidency noted the keen
importance Slovenia attaches to follow-up from the Troika and
asked whether ministers could meet (by DVC if necessary) as
early as April 9. DHS will provide a letter from Secretary
Chertoff to the Slovenian Minister memorializing the progress
made at and since the Troika. DG Faull noted the
Commission's public line will be twin track and common U.S.-
EU overriding goal to get more member states in a modernized,
secure Visa Waiver Program.
MURRAY
.