

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08SANJOSE859, COSTA RICA: PLENTIFUL WATER, POOR MANAGEMENT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08SANJOSE859.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08SANJOSE859 | 2008-10-31 12:50 | 2011-03-21 16:30 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0859/01 3051250
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 311250Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0228
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RHMFIUU/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000859
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA, WHA/CEN, WHA/EPSC, EEB AND OES
PLEASE PASS TO EPA
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR ECON ETRD OVIP PGOV PINR PREL CS SENV
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA: PLENTIFUL WATER, POOR MANAGEMENT
¶1. (U) SUMMARY: A rain-rich climatic regime supplies Costa Rica
with more than enough water. However, the growing threat of
contamination and chronic underinvestment in infrastructure
threatens potable water resources, and undermines Costa Rica's
"clean and green" international image. Urban expansion in the San
Jose area and the rapid expansion of private real estate
developments along the Pacific Coast (in many cases associated with
AmCit investors) test the capacity of the overlapping government
agencies responsible for protecting, regulating, developing,
maintaining, and delivering water resources. The public sector
recognizes the need for legislative reform and public investment
while also engaging with the private sector to tap capital in order
to develop new water projects. Nonetheless, given other GOCR
priorities (such as domestic security) competing for legislative
attention, and the diminished political capital of the Arias
administration, systemic reform is unlikely before the next
elections in 2010. END SUMMARY.
-------------------------------
98 PERCENT RUNNING WATER . . .
-------------------------------
¶2. (U) According to the latest "State of the Nation" (SotN#13)
report, nearly all of Costa Rica's population -- 98 percent --
receives water from pipes and almost all Costa Rican households --
94 percent - have access to running water. The Costa Rican Water
and Sewage Institute (AyA), a national but autonomous public
utility, states that 82 percent of the population receives potable
water and that 16 percent receives untreated water classified by AyA
as unpotable.
------------------------------
BUT GROWING WATER DEMAND . . .
------------------------------
¶3. (U) Costa Rica's rapid urban development has overtaken
institutional capacity to develop and maintain the potable water
resource. Resort development along much of the Pacific Coast has
largely exhausted nearby existing fresh-water sources during the
December-May dry season, prompting calls for major investment in new
projects. The San Jose Greater Metropolitan Area obtains about 80
percent of its potable water from aquifers that are reported to have
reached their extraction capacity, likewise prompting calls for
major investment.
¶4. (U) Yet, Costa Rica's geography is such that even those areas of
Costa Rica with potable water deficits during a portion of the year
have clear potential to tap one of many sources: areas inland of
the Pacific coastal boom towns have underexploited aquifers; tourist
boom towns have obvious access to sea water; numerous rivers drain
into the Pacific and the Caribbean; and the mountains north and
south of the capital city of San Jose are laced with many streams.
Costa Rica's looming water shortage is thus not due to major
physical limitations.
------------------------------
. . . NO ONE CLEARLY IN CHARGE
------------------------------
¶5. (U) The water sector in Costa Rica suffers from a crisis in
governance. Several governmental entities share overlapping (and
sometimes conflicting) responsibility for water management. The
Water Department of the Ministry of Environment, Energy and
Telecommunications (MINAET) is arguably the logical custodian of
water resources, but it is currently an underfunded bureaucracy with
a confused mandate. The GOCR assigns responsibility for reviewing
water quality to the Ministry of Health. The National Irrigation
and Surface Water Service (SENARA) has responsibility for the
evaluation of groundwater resources and for the country's largest
agricultural water project. The National Forest Finance Fund
(FONAFIFO), a department within MINAE, manages the payment of
environmental services to preserve aquifer recharge areas. The
Public Services Regulation Authority (ARESEP) approves water usage
rates charged to individual users by the various system operators.
¶6. (U) Other institutions that regulate land use, and therefore
impact water management, include the National Parks service, the
Forestry Department of MINAE, the Ministry of Agriculture (MAG), the
Institute of Housing and Urban Development (INVU), and local
municipalities. Though these agencies have responsibility for
various aspects of water management, none/none of these agencies
actually deliver water to the user.
¶7. (U) On the operational side, AyA manages water systems serving 46
percent of the Costa Rican population and has nominal legal control
over the systems operated by 1,800+ independent community water
associations ("ASADAS") that serve another 25 percent of the
population. Municipalities manage another 18 percent, the regional
Heredia Public Utility Company (ESPH) has close to 5 percent, and
the remaining roughly 6 percent receive water on their own or are
not in the survey. (Data from SOTN#12, pg 233).
---------------------------------
. . . REVENUE COLLECTION PROBLEMS
---------------------------------
¶8. (U) The Arias Administration adopted water usage and discharge
fees by decree in 2006, yet, to date, only private holders of water
concessions have been paying the fee. Public institutions avoid
payment of the water usage fee, while the discharge fee was
re-defined and is slated to go into effect late this year. Jose
Miguel Zeledon, current director of the MINAET Water Department,
continues to be optimistic that the water usage fee will yield a
total of $10 million per year by 2013 when it is fully in effect,
with 43 percent generated by SENARA, 29 percent from hydroelectric
projects (mostly from the Costa Rican Electrical Institute (ICE)),
13 percent from water systems (AyA, ASADAS, and municipalities) and
the remainder from individual wells and agricultural use. The Water
Department will spend half those funds on the department itself, and
dedicate the other half to reforestation and conservation projects.
-----------------------
. . . AND CONTAMINATION
-----------------------
¶9. (U) Contamination of the water resource has become increasingly
evident in recent years, contradicting Costa Rica's international
reputation as a "clean and green" country. Fecal contamination is
universal in urban waterways; the Tarcoles River leading from the
Central Valley to the Central Pacific coast has been categorized as
"San Jose's Open Sewer." AyA's own statistics for 2007 show that
only 3.5 percent of Costa Rica's sewage is treated under operator
control, underscoring the extent of the problems:
Sewage Lines & Treatment Plant with Operator 3.5%
Latrines 3.5%
Sewage Lines & Treatment Plant w/o Operator 4.9%
Sewage Lines w/o Treatment Plant 20.1%
Septic Tanks 67.3%
AyA estimates that 50 percent of the septic tanks don't work. Thus,
AyA claims that 37 percent of the waste water in Costa Rica -- 3.5
percent plus 33.5 percent -- is treated.
¶10. (U) Aquifer contamination also threatens water quality. Not
only may river water and badly functioning septic tanks eventually
introduce fecal contaminants into the aquifers, but gasoline storage
tanks have already shown the potential for pollution. Agriculture
pollution is a recurrent danger given that Costa Rica's relatively
wealthy agricultural sector, geared for export production, makes
heavy use of agricultural chemicals. In the coastal zones, salt
water intrusion into the aquifers is an imminent threat as lax
management of the aquifers leads to excessive drawdown and exposure
to sea water contamination.
¶11. (U) Although the problem has been building for years, fecal
contamination of coastal waters has become a front-page issue. A
series of tests off of the Pacific coast tourist mecca of Tamarindo
Beach revealed high levels of contamination along the beachfront and
in the ocean. There is no public sewer system in Tamarindo and many
hotels ignore the requirement to treat their own water. Recently,
water tests at the Central Pacific resort town of Jaco revealed
fecal contamination exceeding 1100 parts per 100 milliliters of
water. (COMMENT: the recommended EPA threshold for swimming is 200
parts per 100 milliliters of water. END COMMENT.)
¶12. (U) Health officials finally responded by closing and citing
establishments in the Tamarindo area, while AyA officials continue
to test for pollutants along the coast. The five-star Hotel Resort
Allegro Papagayo was partially closed from February to mid-September
2008 after repeated water pollution violations. The port city of
Puntarenas, further to the south, dumps most of its sewage in the
estuary adjacent to the city, prompting AyA to include a sewage
system for that city among its future projects.
--------------------------------
FINANCING AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR
--------------------------------
¶13. (U) Private water suppliers in Costa Rica are severely limited.
All fresh water in Costa Rica is legal property of the state.
Landowners do not own the water that originates on/under their land
or flows over it, and groups of private landowners who provide
potable water or sewage services to themselves are on shaky legal
ground. Recent legal opinion has tended to confirm AyA's long
insistence that it, the municipalities, and regional authorities are
the sole legal providers of these services and everyone else (ASADAS
and landowner groups) must operate at the pleasure of AyA.
¶14. (U) Although AyA insists upon legal dominance in the water
sector, its true power is reflected by its ability to harness
private capital to develop public water infrastructure. According
to AyA Legal Director Rodolfo Lizano, AyA's current public-private
efforts are based on a 1968 law that stipulates when urban
infrastructure is not already built, a developer may build that
infrastructure and deliver it to AyA. In exchange, for a period of
5 years, subsequent land developers must first pay the developer who
built the infrastructure.
¶15. (U) One project, near the Manuel Antonio National Park on the
Pacific coast, has been successfully built and delivered to AyA.
Further north in the Coco/Sardinal area on the Gulf of Papagayo,
another project stalled because the inland community (Sardinal)
which is to supply water to a beach resort (Coco), protested.
Nevertheless, AyA and the Arias Administration acted decisively to
persuade community leaders that the project benefits the community.
It is likely to be finished. Two other projects in the Tamarindo
area will likewise be financed in the same manner, comments Lizano,
and are ready to move ahead once the controversy in Sardinal passes.
¶16. (U) The Executive President of AyA, Ricardo Sancho, has been a
strong proponent of public/private financing schemes and has also
commented that Costa Rica needs to be more willing than it has been
in the past to go into debt to build water and sewage projects. An
example is the $230 million sewer system project designed to serve a
portion of the San Jose Metropolitan Area. The Japan Development
Bank agreed to a $130 million loan (AyA pays $30 million; the GOCR
pays $100 million). AyA will finance the remaining $100 million
through rates levied on users of the system. This project is also
an illustration of the dangers inherent in the requirement that the
national legislature approve all sovereign debt. Despite the
manifest need for modern sewage treatment, this legislative project
languished for years and was finally approved in October of 2006
when Costa Rica was about to lose the Japanese loan.
-------------------------
ANY PROPOSALS FOR REFORM?
-------------------------
¶17. (U) Costa Rica's existing water law is over 60 years old, yet
concerted attempts to draft a new water law have stalled. Dr. Pedro
Leon, a top environmental advisor to President Arias, told Emboffs
on October 14 that the GOCR hopes to push a new "Water Resources
Law" through for approval in 2009 in concert with President Arias'
"Peace With Nature" initiative. The debate over water resources has
generated heated turf battles between AyA, ASADAs, ESPH, MINAET, the
Health Ministry, SENARA, and ARESEP.
¶18. (U) In addition, more philosophical objections are enunciated by
Carlos Manuel Rodriguez, ex-Minister of MINAET during ex-President
Pacheco's administration, who states that the current water bill is
more "commercial" (and therefore less acceptable) than the law
drafted during Rodriguez's tenure at MINAET. Rodriguez believes that
the legislature will not approve the water bill as currently
proposed. Nevertheless, both he and the Arias administration agree
on two types of water use payments (see para 8 above): a water use
fee ("canon de aprovechamiento de agua") and a pollution or
discharge fee ("canon de vertimiento al agua").
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶19. (SBU) Costa Rica's water sector presents great potential that is
stymied by ineffective law, interagency bickering, and AyA's
struggles to exert operational control while ceding a portion of its
expansion to private/public agreements. As with other public
infrastructure problems here (i.e., regarding highways, ports, and
electrical production), the continued public demand for potable
water will force actors in the sector to do something. The need for
large water and sewer projects in the booming Guanacaste tourist
areas and the rapidly growing San Jose Central Valley is generally
accepted, as is AyA's role as the lead institution in managing those
projects.
¶20. (SBU) However, we believe that any reform to existing water laws
is unlikely to advance during the remaining 18 months of the Arias
administration. There are simply too many more pressing legislative
and political challenges to address, such as the growing domestic
security problem and the impact of the world financial crisis. The
conflicting challenges of delivering improved water and wastewater
services in Costa Rica will likely wait until the next
administration takes office in 2010.
CIANCHETTE