

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON102, NEW ZEALAND'S $1.5NZ BILLION BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON102.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON102 | 2009-04-22 03:03 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO5667
RR RUEHAG RUEHCHI RUEHDF RUEHFK RUEHHM RUEHIK RUEHKSO RUEHLZ RUEHNAG
RUEHPB RUEHRN RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHWL #0102/01 1120303
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 220303Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5840
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1953
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5497
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0832
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 0297
RUEAFCC/FCC WASHINGTON DC
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
RUEHZU/ASIAN PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION
RUEHSS/OECD POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000102
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/ANP, EEB/CIP/BA FOR TIM FINTON, AND DOC/ITA/OTEC FOR
ANDREW BENNETT
STATE PASS TO FCC ROBERT TANNER
STATE PASS TO NTIA
STATE PASS TO PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECPS ECON NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND'S $1.5NZ BILLION BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT
INITIATIVE
Ref: State 27310
WELLINGTON 00000102 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) Summary. In March, Communications and Information
Technology Minister Steven Joyce unveiled plans for GNZ to offer up
to NZ$1.5 billion for building high-speed broadband infrastructure
to cover seventy-five percent of New Zealand. A Crown-owned
investment company is expected, along with private sector partners,
to invest a total of NZ$3 billion into "regional fiber companies"
which will install fiber-optic networks throughout New Zealand's top
25 most densely populated cities and towns. The effort is part of
the government's attempt to marry an overall fiscal stimulus package
with investment in new technology to produce long-range economic and
commercial benefits. The GNZ admits that there are challenges for
the success of the initiative and the Labour opposition has already
slammed the plan as a waste of tax payer money. End Summary.
GNZ to Invest NZ$1.5 Billion in Broadband
-----------------------------------------
¶2. (U) At the end of March, Communications and Information
Technology Minister Steven Joyce unveiled plans to create a
Crown-owned investment company known as the "Crown Fibre Investment
Co" (CFIC) with a mandate to invest up to NZ$1.5 billion of
government funds for building high-speed broadband infrastructure
throughout New Zealand. CFIC will, alongside private sector
investors, put money into "regional fiber companies" that will
install fiber-optic networks in 25 New Zealand towns and cities.
¶3. (U) The effort comes as part of the government's attempt to
marry an overall fiscal stimulus package with investment in new
technology which it hopes will generate long-range economic and
commercial benefits. The new company's goal is to boost broadband
speeds to 100 megabits per second - more than 50 times faster than
speeds currently available - by connecting fiber-optic cables to
homes and businesses. The money will be dispersed via private
companies on a regional basis in a series of "Public-Private
Partnerships." A feasibility study commissioned by the NZ Treasury
and conducted by Milner Consulting Ltd. projects that total fixed
investment (infrastructure costs) required to connect seventy-five
percent of urban New Zealand is expected to range between NZ$2.6 and
NZ$3.3 billion.
Seventy-five Percent of New Zealand to be Connected
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶4. (U) The 25 (initial) centers identified are based on population
and range from Auckland, with 1.2 million people, to Oamaru, with
population of 12,681. Once finished, the GNZ hopes this investment
model "will deliver on the government's commitment of ultra fast
broadband to 75 percent of New Zealanders where they live, work and
study over the next ten years," said Joyce. Those towns or rural
areas outside this initial group would eventually get "improved"
internet services but that would occur in the second phase of the
initiative. The more remote regions could expect eventual upgrades
to broadband but they would not have the fiber enabling the
ultra-fast broadband, said Joyce.
Commerce Commission Report on Current NZ Broadband
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶5. (U) Apart from the CFIC initiative, the New Zealand Commerce
Commission's latest report claims that the quality of current
broadband services improved greatly by end of 2008. The Commerce
Commission released its report just days after the government
announced the CFIC initiative. The report, drafted by IDC
Consultants and Epitiro (consulting firms contracted by Commerce
Commission), claims that Telecom, TelstraClear DSL, Vodafone, Orcon
and Slingshot (firms with the largest share of the current NZ
internet market) have boosted their broadband scores by between 99
percent and 166 percent over the course of 2008. Most of this was
due to investment in their current networks and additional
improvements stemmed from the inclusion of ADSL2+ technology
(Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line - a data communications
technology that enables faster data transmission over copper
telephone lines).
WELLINGTON 00000102 002.2 OF 003
¶6. (U) As of June 2008, New Zealand ranked 19 out of 30 OECD
countries in terms of numbers of broadband connections, with about
20 broadband subscribers per 100 of population. Total broadband
connections, including fixed and wireless connections, had reached
915,000 by December 31, 2008. The overall quality of broadband
services has also improved, with major internet service providers
investing in extra network capacity. Nearly 60 per cent of digital
subscriber line (DSL) connections had now been upgraded to the newer
and faster ADSL2+.
Likely Investors Reviewing GNZ Proposal
---------------------------------------
¶7. (U) An internal report (Castalia consultants) commissioned by
the three largest telecommunications firms in NZ - Telecom, Vodafone
and TelstraClear - said their own investment plans would deliver
broadband speeds adequate for the needs of everyday internet users
without the need for a boost from the Government. Castalia
challenged the belief that high broadband speeds for households - up
to 50 times faster than what is presently available - would deliver
significant economic benefits.
¶8. (U) Telecom (largest NZ telecommunication firm) has set up an
internal "think tank" to formulate its response to the Government's
NZ$1.5 billion plan. Sources suggest there is still internal debate
within Telecom about the implications of the government plan.
"Telecom will be reviewing the opportunities the initiative presents
to work with the proposed CFIC to extend the reach of Telecom's own
ultra-fast broadband network, and to utilize the fiber networks
others may build," said chief executive Paul Reynolds. Reynolds
further opined that Telecom "looked forward to working with
government funding to complement the government's plans to take fast
broadband even further, including to those areas that currently are
not commercially viable." Telecom's current share of the retail
broadband market has slipped to 57 percent, down from 61 per cent in
¶2007.
¶9. (U) In addition to the traditional telecommunication firms
considering the CFIC's offer, Auckland-based Vector Energy is also
likely to be a prime candidate to join up with the new investment
company CFIC in rolling out fiber optic cables to homes and
businesses. Vector currently has 500km of fiber optic network laid
in Auckland's business districts and is expanding that network by an
extra 300km as part of an agreement with Vodafone.
Endorsements
------------
¶10. (U) Much of the GNZ's current CFIC plan was based on a March
2008 study by the Auckland-based New Zealand Institute entitled,
"Assessing New Zealand's Current Broadband Path: The Need for
Change." The NZ Institute concluded that the current state of NZ
broadband was insufficient. The NZ Institute maintained that the
announced investment by the major telecoms would not take NZ far
enough fast enough. Despite the dominant investor (Telecom) making
significant investments in fiber-optic, it had insufficient
commercial incentive to roll it out rapidly. Finally, the longer NZ
took to roll out its fiber-optic upgrade, the more costly it would
become thus shutting out all but the major urban centers.
¶11. (U) CFIC's plans have been favorably welcomed by the
Telecommunications Users Association, TUANZ. "The Minister's paper
is at the top end of our expectations," said TUANZ's chief executive
Ernie Newman. "It sets out a clear structure for the proposed
partnerships, and will give potential partners in the private sector
all the information they need to come up with regionally-based
proposals." Newman said the plan appeared to be "sector-neutral" -
meaning it opened the way for a wide range of potential co-investors
including telecommunications companies, power line companies, or
regional groupings. This was important, said Newman, as a greater
diversity of investors were "showing their hands and broadening the
range of innovative, cost-effective solutions."
Criticism of the Plan
---------------------
WELLINGTON 00000102 003.2 OF 003
¶12. (U) Labour Party's Finance spokesman David Cunliffe accused the
Government of "performing a NZ$1.5 billion back flip." He said the
scheme largely mirrored the approach of Labour's NZ$325 million
Broadband Investment Fund (BIF), which the Government scrapped, but
was more wasteful of taxpayers' dollars. Minister Joyce responded,
saying the Government's plan differed from Labour's in three key
respects: its sheer size, the Government's investment in fiber
providers instead of handing out subsidies, and its focus on fiber
to the home, rather than a mix of other technologies such as
wireless and/or satellite broadband.
¶13. (U) The Government conceded that there was a risk that private
investors might not come forward with their share of the NZ$3
billion, that this might not be enough to provide the desired
network coverage, and that local fiber companies might fail. Laws
might be changed to make it easier for contractors to string cables
on power and telephone poles, and to lay fiber in "micro-trenches"
cut in roads. Tim Davin, policy manager at the Institute for
Professional Engineers, said 25,000 kilometers of cabling would be
needed. New Zealand did not have enough trained engineers to build
the network, but some could be brought in from overseas, he said.
Comment
-------
¶14. (SBU) Despite the contested nature of the high-speed broadband
debate, most seem to agree that the best way forward for NZ is
through the Government's proposed collaborative approach. There are
a number of technical issues yet to be worked through and engaging
with the country's major telecoms will help the GNZ to form a
clearer roadmap towards developing an effective plan for the
proposed NZ$1.5 billion in spending. The GNZ's commitment to invest
in New Zealand's broadband infrastructure clearly demonstrates the
importance the National-led government attaches to state-of-the art
information and communication technologies (ICT) as an enabler of
business and a driver of international competitiveness. To date,
too much of the broadband debate in NZ has focused on the "last
mile" of infrastructure and centered on broadband access alone.
Faster broadband will eventually encourage developments in areas
such as eHealth (real time remote healthcare monitoring and
diagnosis) and education through improved research and
communications technologies and enhanced distance learning - all of
which were National Party campaign promises. End Comment.
KEEGAN