

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07MEXICO4334, MEXICAN TELECOMMUNICATION POLICY TARGETS TELMEX
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07MEXICO4334.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07MEXICO4334 | 2007-08-14 15:31 | 2011-03-17 12:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Mexico |
Appears in these articles: http://wikileaks.jornada.com.mx/notas/hay-preocupacion-de-que-el-duopolio-televisivo-sigue-ejerciendo-influencia-sobre-poderes-judicial-y-legislativo |
VZCZCXRO9872
PP RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #4334/01 2261531
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 141531Z AUG 07
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAFCC/FCC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8425
INFO RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
118838
2007-08-14 15:31:00
07MEXICO4334
Embassy Mexico
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
07STATE45618
VZCZCXRO9872
PP RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #4334/01 2261531
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 141531Z AUG 07
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAFCC/FCC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8425
INFO RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 MEXICO 004334
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA/MEX AND EB/CIP
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR JONATHAN MCHALE AND CATHERINE
HINCKLEY
FCC FOR HELEN DOMENICI, KATHRYN O'BRIEN, AND DAVID FURTH,
FCC FOR LARRY OLSON, BRIAN MARENCO AND EMILY TALAGA
NTIA FOR KARL NEBBIA AND JANE COFFIN
USDOC FOR 4320/ITA/MAC/WH/ONAFTA/GWORD
ITA FOR MICHELLE O'NEILL AND DAMON GREER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ECPS ENIV PGOV MX
SUBJECT: MEXICAN TELECOMMUNICATION POLICY TARGETS TELMEX
REF: STATE 45618
Summary
-------
¶1. (SBU) On August 3, as part of the Ninth Meeting of the
High Level Consultative Commission (HLCC) on
Telecommunications, Rafael del Villar, Under Secretary for
Communications at the Secretariat of Communications and
Transportation (SCT), briefed a small group of Department of
State (DOS), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and
Department of Commerce (DOC) officials on Mexican President
Felipe Calderon's telecommunications policy. SCT Secretary
Luis Tellez Kuenzler joined the meeting and supported del
Villar's assertions. Del Villar emphasized that SCT's
primary concern is the lack of penetration of landline
telephone and broadband services. Among other proposals, del
Villar suggested that while participating in the upcoming
Security and Prosperity Partnership in Canada, the three
Leaders propose to dramatically lower long distance
interconnection rates to make calling within North America
within reach for even the poorest citizens. With the "social
good" argument as a backbone, it appears that the SCT and
possibly the Calderon Government may try to tackle the
Mexican telecom monopoly, Telmex's dominance in the sector.
End Summary.
Clarifying Roles in the Sector
------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) Summarizing the current state of Mexico's telecom
sector, del Villar said the Calderon administration will seek
to clarify the roles SCT, the Federal Telecommunications
Commission (Cofetel), and the Federal Competition Commission
(Cofeco) play in the sector. He highlighted the political
role of the SCT as a planning and policy body with the power
to decide which radio frequency bands will be auctioned and
when. He stated that, for the first time since 1990 (when
Telmex was privatized), the SCT is more willing to support
competition and openness than the regulator (Cofetel), a
situation he termed a "political anomaly." Also, for the
first time in Mexican history, the President is keenly aware
of the important issues facing the telecom sector and is
creating a political climate that is conducive to moving
forward with telecom policy. He pointed out that Cofetel is
a part of the SCT (and hence Executive Branch) and not an
independent regulator like the FCC in the U.S. He also
stressed that the SCT currently enjoys an excellent working
relationship with Cofeco.
Social Good Argument
--------------------
3.(SBU) Del Villar observed that the rural areas of Mexico
have been devastated by migration. He cited "heroic
families" in which the husband travels to the U.S. to work to
send money home, yet his wife is left in Mexico, unable to
call her husband in the U.S. because of prohibitively high
telecommunication rates. High fixed and mobile
interconnection rates; the lack of unlimited calling plans;
and the need for technology to decrease overall telecom costs
drive SCT telecom policy. He reiterated Mexico's commitment
to "Calling Party Pays," but also his concern with the level
of tariffs. He might seek to implement a "Bill and Keep"
regime in mobile telephony in Mexico in which each network
agrees to terminate calls from the other network at no
charge. Cofetel is in the process of developing its
Fundamental Technical Plan for Interconnection and is holding
a second period for public comment that ends August 10.
Broadband Penetration Lacking
-----------------------------
¶4. (SBU) Del Villar suggested possible policy changes to
promote broadband penetration in Mexico. Broadband network
"unbundling" would foster increased network investment by
outside players. Del Villar added that Mexico would label
this proposal "leasing of the last mile" to avoid any
MEXICO 00004334 002 OF 003
negative stigma. He noted that while this policy would be
tough to implement, it was nonetheless being considered
because SCT has not seen sufficient investment by Telmex in
its network. Second, he suggested that Mexico allow the
resale of broadband in the marketplace. Third, because
approximately twenty-six percent of Mexican mobile users do
not have access to a fixed line, he would like broadband to
be offered on a stand-alone basis instead of solely with a
package. Last, he suggested one option for Mexico might be
public-private partnerships in which the government might be
the owner of spectrum that is operated by a local government
or community mechanism. Mexico, he continued, has the
spectrum available to do this with the ultimate goal being
increased rural access to the Internet.
Broadcasting Sector in the Hands of the President
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶5. (SBU) Throughout the conversation, del Villar was
careful to reiterate that he was referring only to Mexican
telecommunications policy, not broadcasting. Because of the
political fallout that licensing a third broadcasting network
would cause, the decision on whether to move forward rests
with President Calderon. Del Villar did mention that through
changes in the existing licenses of current broadcasters, the
Government may impose a "must carry / must offer" policy. He
noted SCT fears Telmex collusion with Televisa in the video
services market to secure cheap content, while squeezing out
other smaller potential competitors.
Spectrum Negotiations
---------------------
¶6. (SBU) The U.S. and Mexican delegations also held spectrum
negotiations during a three-day HLCC working level meeting
(July 31-August 2) immediately prior to the Ninth HLCC on
August 3. As a result, at the Ninth HLCC the principals
signed three documents:(A)A Permanent Protocol concerning the
allotment and use of the 138-144 MHz band for terrestrial
non-broadcasting radio communication services along the
U.S.-Mexican border; (B) A Joint Statement of the principals
at the Ninth HLCC; and (C) A Directory of Bilateral Issues
for 2007-2009 (DBI). In terms of ongoing negotiations to
reconfigure the allotment plan of the 800 MHz band, del
Villar noted that the SCT is actively engaged in negotiations
with Nextel Mexico and Intercomunicacion del Pacifico, a
subsidiary of Telmex, the two most affected Mexican carriers.
The SCT also requested assistance from the FCC in determining
a realistic cost for network carrier actions to relocate the
affected Mexican carriers within the 800 MHz band as well as
to move them to an alternate band.
¶7. (SBU) On the topic of increasing broadband penetration by
means of near-term spectrum auctions, (para.4 above), in the
three-day working level meeting, SCT and Cofetel officials
pressed U.S. representatives to identify additional radio
bands suitable for broadband applications and place them in
the DBI so that new cross-border sharing agreements could be
reached. These bands included: 420-450 MHz, 698-806 MHz
("700 MHz"), 2300-2400 MHz and 3300-3700 MHz bands. All of
these bands were included in the DBI except the 2300-2400 MHz
which will be discussed informally in upcoming HLCC working
level teleconferences. (The U.S. and Mexico currently have
an agreement in place for the 2310-2360 MHz band for the
Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service used extensively by
U.S. providers XM Satellite Radio and Sirius Satellite
Radio). SCT and Cofetel also mentioned their interest in
amending the existing Protocol for Personal Communications
Services in the 1850-1990 MHz band to also support wireless
broadband.
The three HLCC documents that were signed will be posted
shortly on the Department's public website at :
http://www.state.gov/e/eeb/cip/c622.htm.
Improvements for Cross Border Security Communications
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶8. (SBU) Representatives of Mexico's Secretariat of Public
MEXICO 00004334 003 OF 003
Safety (SSP) and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
reported in the working level meeting that the HLCC Security
Communications Task Group plans to complete its Plan for the
Long Term Solution for Cross Border Security Communications
shortly and submit the Plan to the HLCC for adoption. The
Plan reportedly includes establishment of six cross border
microwave links in the 7-8.5 GHz band that will allow voice,
data and video intercommunications between communications
centers of law enforcement agencies on both sides. In the
principals meeting, DOS also mentioned the need for a second
phase of the "Long Term Solution" that would address
reciprocal licensing for mobile and portable equipment of
public safety agencies on both sides as well as improving
mutual-aid communications for specific individual public
safety agencies on each side. These are the continuing
actions described in reftel, and the Plan will be distributed
to border consulates when completed.
Del Villar Proposes a North America-wide Calling Area
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶9. (SBU) Lowering interconnection rates is high on SCT's
agenda, justified to the public and the industry by the
"social good" argument. At the meeting, del Villar and
Tellez said that if the U.S., Canada and Mexico could come to
an agreement to trilaterally lower interconnection rates for
telephony across the region, this would help the GOM to
convince Telmex to relinquish some hold on the sector.
Comment
-------
¶10. (SBU) Telmex seems to be feeling the pressure as there is
already speculation in the industry that the monopoly will
file an injunction against Cofetel's proposed interconnection
plan. The SCT appears to have firmly taken control of
telecommunications policy in Mexico and has an arsenal of
ideas for progress in the sector. In telecommunication
negotiations, we are seeing unprecedented levels of positive
engagement from our Mexican counterparts. SCT Under
Secretary del Villar has a lot of energy and progressive
SIPDIS
ideas, now it's a matter of how much momentum he can gather
to push for change in the industry. End comment.
¶11. (U) This cable was prepared jointly with collaboration
of members of the U.S. delegation from EEB/CIP.
Visit Mexico City's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/mexicocity and the North American
Partnership Blog at http://www.intelink.gov/communities/state/nap /
BASSETT