

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05QUITO710, ECUADOR'S WHITE GOODS POLICIES
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05QUITO710.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05QUITO710 | 2005-03-31 20:08 | 2011-05-02 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Quito |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 QUITO 000710
SIPDIS
DEPT PASS TO USTR BENNETT HARMAN
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD EINV ECON EC
SUBJECT: ECUADOR'S WHITE GOODS POLICIES
REF: STATE 30500
¶1. Summary. In response to reftel, Emboffs met with newly
appointed Vice Minister of Industries in the Ministry of
Trade (MICIP) Jorge Illingworth and Ecuadorian Standards
Institute (INEN) Director General Felipe Urresta to discuss
white goods. Urresta had not, as he had offered to USTR,
presented his proposal to the Special Committee to suspend
the current practice that had prevented entry of certain
US-produced white goods into Ecuador. Though he had on two
occasions received copies of the US white paper on Ecuador
standards and our request to provide a written response, he
has not provided us with one. He did provide an oral
response and requested a meeting with USTR and Embassy
officials prior to the April 18-22 Lima round of FTA
negotiations. Though the GOE claims it complies with its WTO
commitments regarding technical trade barriers, its
interpretation of compliance leaves plenty of room for doubt.
End Summary.
White Paper Comments
--------------------
¶2. Commercial and Econ officers recently met with newly
appointed Vice Minister of Industries in the Ministry of
Foreign Trade (MICIP) Jorge Illingworth and President of the
Ecuadorian Standards Institute (INEN) Felipe Urresta to
discuss the USG white paper provided in reftel. Urresta
confirmed that he had received copies of the white paper from
USTR and the Embassy on two separate occasions. He had not
provided a copy of the white paper to the &Special
Committee8 referred to by Urresta and the white paper, which
is the Comite Interinstitucional de Normalizacion, or
Inter-institutional Standards Committee (CIN by its Spanish
initials), but said he had discussed the salient points of
the white paper with CIN.
¶3. Illingworth and Urresta said that the trade statistics
they reviewed (from manifestos.com) do not indicate a
significant drop in US white goods entering Ecuador. They
said instead that the statistics indicated imports of white
goods from other countries (especially Brazil, Italy and
Colombia) were growing more rapidly than imports from the
USA. Urresta also asserted that there is nothing new in
Ecuador,s procedures regarding white goods, claiming that
the GOE is simply implementing its 1998 standards law.
¶4. According to Urresta, neither the INEN nor MICIP have ever
rejected Underwriter Laboratories (UL) certifications.
Urresta also claims that the GOE need not, under the WTO
Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, notify the WTO if the
GOE is applying internationally recognized standards and
processes, as is the case with white goods. He denied that
the GOE was requiring new INEN-1 compliance certificates for
superficial changes to white goods (e.g., new colors).
Urresta Takes No Action on His Offer to USTR
--------------------------------------------
¶5. Urresta had also not discussed with CIN the offer that he
had made to USTR,s Suzanne Troje last October. We again
reviewed the content of that offer for Illingworth,s
benefit. First, INEN would repeal the regulations and
instructivos (described by Urresta as mandatory instructions
designed to eliminate discretion when implementing
regulations) that have prevented some US white goods from
entering Ecuador. Second, the GOE would issue a formal
notification of new regulations with a 90-day period to
receive comments on the proposed regulations. Third, the GOE
would arrange a transparent review of the comments received
in response to the notice. Finally, the GOE would publish
the new regulation, allowing six months for implementation
before it took full effect. Urresta said he was willing to
bring the proposal to CIN, but later offered an alternative
to unblock the entry of US-made refrigerator freezers. He
said the CIN could approve a modification to the regulations
that would allow US origin refrigerators and freezers to
enter Ecuador upon presentation of a UL 250 compliance
certificate, a certificate of &tropicalization8, and a
certification that the equipment does not use CFCs. Urresta
suggested that USTR and Embassy officials meet in Quito prior
to the April 14-18 Lima FTA negotiations round.
Organizational Structure
------------------------
¶6. The CIN and various technical committees are the principal
bodies involved in standards and compliance policy.
Established in 1998 by Executive Decree 1536, the CIN is
responsible for publishing the list of goods that must comply
with Ecuadorian norms and technical registrations. The
CIN,s duties include adding or removing products from the
list of those that must comply with Ecuadorian regulations,
recommending guidelines for the correct application of this
law, recommending processes to harmonize national standards
with international ones, and any other activity related to
the contents of this decree.
¶7. The CIN published the first list of products subject to
norms and technical regulations in 1999, with subsequent
modifications in 2000, 2002 and 2003. In January 2003, by
Executive Decree 3497, the GOE introduced the INEN-1
certificate, which certifies that a product complies with
Ecuadorian technical regulations. The INEN-1 is valid for
one year. The list of products was last modified in August
2003 by Acuerdo Interministerial 03420 (Registro Oficial 158)
to include new types of gas ranges and refrigerators.
¶8. Executive Decree 3497 also defined who would serve on the
CIN: the vice ministers of Industry and Foreign Trade of
MICIP, one representative each from the chambers of commerce,
industries and small industries and the Director General of
INEN (currently Urresta). The latter is not a voting member
of CIN, but in effect runs CIN agendas and meetings. INEN
provides technical assistance to the CIN and the technical
committees. Embassy sources indicate that INEN (through
Urresta) manages and leads much of the standards work,
leaving the CIN to rely upon INEN,s technical expertise.
¶9. The technical committees are responsible for formulating
new regulations, revising old ones and drafting instructivos.
The instructivos, described above, also include information
essential to a company wishing to import regulated products.
However, Urresta asserts that the TBT agreement does not
require publication of instructivos or public notices of
changes in the instructivos. Nor are the instructivos
published on the INEN website. They are also not published
in the official register but take effect immediately upon
adoption. Urresta claims that there is no need to notify the
public of instructivos because they do not change laws or
regulations, but merely implement them.
Current Process
---------------
¶10. MICIP (at the behest of INEN) initiates a new regulation
or regulatory change when the INEN sends emails to specific
stakeholders, reportedly by sending them to various chambers
of industry, informing them of a proposed regulatory change.
INEN does send out an electronic bulletin every three
months, but it covers activities that occurred in the prior
quarter. October 2004 was the last electronic bulletin
posted on the INEN website. Though the website has links for
additional information on numerous standards issues, there is
no link for technical regulation notifications.
¶11. MICIP (again through INEN) convenes technical committees
on specific topics. According to Urresta, one must be
&technically qualified8 to participate in these meetings.
For example, in one case, invitations were sent to 27
individuals from local industry, chambers of commerce and
industry, universities and other government officials. A
technical committee was formed with 11 voting members, 1
representing a foreign manufacturer, 7 representing local
manufacturers and their suppliers, and 1 each from a
technical university, the college of mechanical engineers and
MICIP. Interested parties may send comments to the technical
committee, but the committee itself decides which comments
are worthy of consideration. INEN representatives serve as
the secretariat for the technical committees, producing draft
language for review and discussion by the committees.
Urresta resisted our suggestion to open the technical
committee meetings to the public.
¶12. After six-eight months, the technical committee submits
the to INEN,s Board of Directors (the Consejo Directivo, or
CD). The CD reviews the draft and generally forwards it to
the CIN, who in turn passes it to the Minister of MICIP for
approval. On those occasions when the CD suggests changes to
the draft, it is returned to the technical committee to be
modified and is then re-submitted to the CD. The CD sends
the vetted draft through the CIN to the Minister, who signs
the new regulation.
¶13. The GOE modified its notifications procedures in 2004.
Once a regulation is adopted, the regulation is published in
the official register and reported to the WTO by the MICIP
&inquiry point of contact.8 The WTO notification includes
the address, phone number, fax and e-mail of the inquiry
point of contact, but not the incumbent,s name (currently
Arturo Barbosa of MICIP). The WTO notice does not provide
direct access to new regulations or other related documents.
¶14. Urresta said that under the WTO TBT Agreement Ecuador was
not required to state in its WTO notices where a new
regulation could be obtained. Providing a point of contact
for further inquiries was sufficient, he asserted. He also
said that only comments from other governments (not private
companies or individuals) would be accepted by the GOE during
the 60-day WTO comment period. (Note: Andean Community
countries (CAN) ) Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and
Venezuela ) by agreement have 90 days under a CAN
agreement.) Also, Urresta claims that Ecuador is not
required under the WTO TBT Agreement to notify or publish
regulations that are applying internationally recognized
standards or procedures, which he cites is the case with
white goods.
Proposed Quality Law
--------------------
¶15. Illingworth told us that Ecuador does have a proposal for
a new quality law that he helped to draft when he was Vice
President of the Guayaquil Chamber of Industries. However,
given the turmoil in the Ecuadorian Congress (a near
permanent condition, made worse over the last several
months), the new law will not be proposed to Congress in the
immediate future. (Comment: We believe it unlikely that any
serious structural reforms can be passed during the remainder
of President Gutierrez,s term in office, which expires in
January 2007. End comment.) Urresta touts a 1999 World Bank
project designed in part to restructure Ecuador,s standards,
testing and compliance agencies. However, the World Bank,
for lack of GOE progress, withdrew the funding.
Comment
-------
¶16. What is clear from our review of the Ecuadorian standards
policy and compliance mechanisms is that INEN controls most
of the process. The lack of notification to and
participation by the public means that INEN can operate as
the &technical expert8 with little to no checks and
balances, leaving considerable room for special interest
interference. Even the technical committees are stacked in
favor of local producers, thereby suggesting legitimacy to
protectionist policies. INEN has said that the WTO requires
all previous obligatory Ecuadorian technical standards to
become voluntary within three years. Therefore, Ecuador will
likely move to rewrite its technical standards as technical
regulations. In February, for the first time, Ecuador
notified two new technical regulations.
KENNEY