

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06HELSINKI1248, FINLAND: NATO DEBATE HEATS UP
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06HELSINKI1248.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06HELSINKI1248 | 2006-12-19 13:12 | 2011-04-24 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Helsinki |
VZCZCXRO8856
RR RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ RUEHROV
DE RUEHHE #1248/01 3531312
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 191312Z DEC 06
FM AMEMBASSY HELSINKI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2840
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO 4661
RUEHRK/AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK 0268
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 0929
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HELSINKI 001248
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PGOV MOPS MARR EUN RU FI
SUBJECT: FINLAND: NATO DEBATE HEATS UP
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The March 2007 parliamentary election
campaign is about to kick off and NATO is emerging as a key
theme, just as it did in the January 2006 presidential
elections -- and despite the efforts of several prominent
politicians to muzzle public debate on this sensitive topic.
This cable offers a snapshot of the current NATO debate in
Finland, and subsequent reporting will examine the impact of
NATO and security issues on both the elections and the new
government that emerges. End Summary
Background: Is NATO Still the Political Kiss of Death?
--------------------------------------------- ---------
¶2. (SBU) Finland's general Parliamentary elections are four
months away (March 2007). As the election looms closer, the
question of whether Finland should accede to NATO is
generating renewed public interest and debate. President
Tarja Halonen was re-elected in January by a surprisingly
thin
margin over her Conservative Party challenger, Sauli Niinsto.
Security policy -- and especially the NATO issue -- played a
significant role in the presidential campaign. Halonen, a
Social Democrat (SDP), had long opposed joining NATO and had
expressed similar reservations about European Security and
Defense Policy (ESDP) planning. (At one point, she suggested
that no EU military operations could be legitimate or
justified in the absence of UN authorization, but
subsequently
moderated that stance.) Niinsto stopped short of advocating
outright NATO accession, but his positive comments about
possible future membership and his support for greater
regional and international engagement by Finland were widely
interpreted as de facto support for accession sooner rather
than later.
¶3. (SBU) Pundits in Finland have long predicted that public
support for NATO membership would be the kiss of death for
any
Finnish politician, and that debate rages on as the
Parliamentary contests approach. With Niinisto almost having
pulled off an upset, many now argue that his outspoken stance
on security policy may have been the issue that separated him
from Halonen and others and captured the imagination of
voters. Those same voices hold that although Halonen won,
her
poorer than expected showing resulted in part from a
perception that her idealism was coloring her foreign policy
judgment too much and leading to unrealistic "ivory tower"
policies that risked isolating Finland from the European
mainstream. However, others -- including leading
Conservative
Party strategists -- tell us that NATO and security policies
actually were the kiss of death for Niinisto. In their
version, had he not been so forward leaning in these areas,
he
would have picked up the additional 2.5 percentage points he
needed and toppled Halonen. In particular, Conservatives now
say, Finnish Center Party voters, who favored many of
Niinisto's other arguments, remained staunchly opposed to
NATO
membership and reacted to Niinisto's NATO arguments either by
voting for Halonen or by staying home. Opinion polls still
show a large majority of Finns opposed to NATO membership,
but
opposition remains especially high among the largely rural
voters who make up the vast majority of the Center Party's
base. One final factor, according to both our Center and
Conservative Party contacts, was the overwhelming and still
passionate opposition to the US invasion of Iraq. Although
polls indicated that most Finns believed NATO membership
should remain a viable option, and that Finland would
inevitably accede at some point, they still link NATO to the
US, and the war remains a factor in voters' calculations.
The Press Kicks Off This Season's Debate
----------------------------------------
¶4. (SBU) Campaign season for the March 2007 contests does not
even begin until January 1, but Finland's press corps kicked
things off in October when Finland's two largest newspapers
--
the Helsingin Sanomat (Helsinki) and Aamulehti (Tampere) --
ran their first-ever editorials officially advocating NATO
accession for Finland. The two big dailies were followed
quickly by several smaller publications. The newspapers'
argument for accession was based on the fact that Finland is
an active participant in NATO operations in Afghanistan, the
Balkans, and elsewhere but that regardless of what shape or
form an enhanced NATO partnership might take after the Riga
Summit, lack of full membership would relegate Finland to
continued second-class citizen status -- without the role in
HELSINKI 00001248 002 OF 003
decision-making, operational planning, and intelligence-
sharing that the country desires. A secondary theme that was
addressed obliquely was renewed concern over Russia. Finnish
politicians and journalists alike are cautious when alluding
to any possible threat from the Russian bear, and concerns
about Russian backsliding on human rights and democracy are
not the driving force behind the current debate; however, a
level of concern about recent trends in Moscow is always a
hidden subtext in any Finnish debate on security policy.
Lipponen and Kaariainen Square Off
----------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) Hard on the heels of the editorial staffs, two of
Finland's most prominent politicians -- one historically pro-
NATO, the other a staunch opponent -- weighed in publicly.
Social Democratic (SDP) Speaker of Parliament Paavo Lipponen,
the longtime advocate, said that Finland would be hard
pressed
to defend itself in the future without help from NATO.
However, Lipponen also knows that NATO is not a winning issue
for his Social Democratic party, largely because its other
heavy hitters -- namely President Halonen and Foreign
Minister
Erkki Tuomioja -- strongly oppose Finland's joining NATO.
For
that reason, while holding true to his convictions, Lipponen
also tried to pre-empt a discussion of NATO during this
campaign, suggesting that the real debate should wait until
after the 2007 elections. Then, possibly, a more NATO-
friendly Parliament might be seated, and leading NATO
detractors like Foreign Minister Erkki Tuomioja (SDP) and
Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen (who is constrained by his
Center Party constituency) might be removed to less powerful
roles.
¶6. (SBU) Lipponen's remarks were followed by those of Defense
Minister Seppo Kaariainen (Center Party), who told
journalists
that by 2020, Finland would be unable to maintain its current
system of territorial defense without large increases in
shrinking defense budgets or NATO membership. Kaariainen's
comments were initially noteworthy, because he has never
favored NATO accession and generally shied away from entering
the public fray. They also prompted immediate attacks. FM
Tuomioja blasted the DefMin for "threatening" the GoF with
the
inevitability of NATO membership. Although Tuomioja didn't
use the word "blackmail," the gist of his remarks was that
Kaariainen was indeed blackmailing the government for greater
defense expenditures by presenting NATO as the only option in
the absence of bigger budgets for the military. The FM said
that joining NATO was a political issue, not an economic one;
and could not be made on the basis of budgetary
considerations
alone. President Halonen predictably seconded Tuomioja's
position saying there was no need for Finland to join NATO,
no
need for further debate at the present time, and no plans for
the GoF to revisit the issue in the near future. PM Matti
Vanhanen (who is a committed trans-Atlanticist but knows he
stands to gain nothing from his own base by favoring NATO
membership) initially stayed clear of the public sparring,
but
later showed solidarity with the FM and President, declaring
that NATO issues should not be discussed during the campaign.
Lesser political luminaries such as former communist Jaako
Lakso, an outspoken member of Parliament from the Left
Alliance, also added their voices to those decrying
Kaariainen's assessment.
¶7. (SBU) Kaariainen and Lipponen did not respond publicly to
any of the commotion; but sources from across the political
spectrum now tell us that Kaariainen's gambit, in particular,
was never intended as a show of support for Finland's NATO
accession. Instead, they said, it was a clever means of
allowing others such as Halonen and Tuomioja to publicly shut
down the NATO debate. Liisa Jaakonsaari, the SDP chair of
Parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee (and, like Lipponen, a
strong supporter of NATO membership, was unusually harsh in
her public criticism of the GoF's position -- especially that
of Halonen -- and she was furious with Kaariainen.
Jaakonsaari lamented in particularly the fact that
Kaariainen's response seemed designed to allow Halonen and
others to cut off all debate on the subject. As another MP
put it, Kaariainen "certainly hasn't changed his tune on
NATO,
he just wants a bigger defense budget." Max Jakobson,
Finland's most respected ex-diplomat and foreign policy "grey
eminence," also spoke out against the government's negative
HELSINKI 00001248 003 OF 003
assessment and attempt to close down the dialogue. The
career
minister said that it was unfortunate the GoF was trying to
"close the door" on NATO membership for the foreseeable
future
and implied that some NATO membership opponents were afraid
of
an open debate about accession.
Even the Bear Growls
--------------------
¶8. (SBU) Not to be left out, Russian officials took advantage
of the opportunity to register their interest. Russia's
ambassador to Finland said that Moscow was "satisfied" with
what he described as "Finland's clearly stated policy" to not
apply for membership in the near future. The visiting Chief
of the Russian General Staff went somewhat further; speaking
at a Helsinki press conference alongside his Finnish
counterpart, the general opined that Finland should consider
"the consequences of joining the alliance" on the Finnish-
Russian bilateral relationship. He referred to the Baltic
states as having been turned into "worrying gray areas" by
their decision to join NATO.
Comment
-------
¶9. (SBU) If nothing else, the NATO and security policy debate
promises to be a major theme in the upcoming parliamentary
campaign, despite the efforts of several senior politicians
to
muzzle it. We will follow it closely and, on the public
diplomacy side, continue to do our part to dispel rumors,
correct misimpressions and simply offer the facts regarding
the US position. Subsequent reporting will examine how the
campaign and the election results will impact the Finnish
NATO
debate going forward.
WARE