

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON88, NEW ZEALAND TO REDRAFT SECTION 92A OF NEW
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON88.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON88 | 2009-04-03 03:31 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO8351
PP RUEHNZ
DE RUEHWL #0088/01 0930331
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 030331Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5818
INFO RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 5483
RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND PRIORITY 1943
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY PRIORITY 0822
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY 0294
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000088
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE PASS TO USPTO, U.S COPYRIGHT OFFICE, USTR JARED
RAGLAND, COMMERCE FOR ITA/MAC/OIPR, STATE FOR EAP/ANP,
EEB/TPP/IPE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD KIPR NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND TO REDRAFT SECTION 92A OF NEW
COPYRIGHT LAW
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: On March 23, New Zealand's Minister of
Commerce Simon Power announced that the GNZ would suspend
section 92A of the new copyright law, which would have
created new regulations for terminating internet accounts of
repeat copyright infringers. Negotiators for both the
intellectual property rights (IPR) industry and the
Telecommunications Carrier Forum (TCF - the association of
internet service providers (ISPs)) were surprised; they had
felt they were close to finalizing a voluntary code of
practice which would have served as the regulatory foundation
for enforcing this section of the law. Minister Power
decided that the proposed code might not be workable on a
voluntary basis, and therefore reasserted the government's
authority to redraft section 92A. In doing so he reaffirmed
the GNZ's commitment to the importance of IPR protection to
NZ's creative industries. It now will be crucial to monitor
the progress of GNZ redrafting to ensure it succeeds in a
timely manner. End Summary.
Background
----------
¶2. (SBU) The Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act 2008
was originally scheduled to go into full force on February
28, 2009 but in the weeks leading up to the deadline, public
interest groups raised a chorus of concerns claiming that the
law's requirement to terminate internet subscribers who
allegedly "pirated" digital copyrighted materials over the
internet would infringe on due process, freedom of speech and
the public's right to access information. The negative
publicity led to demonstrations staged in front of
Parliament, organized by a group called the Creative Freedom
Foundation.
¶3. (SBU) The publicity drew the attention of some minority
party politicians who hoped to ride a new populist wave. The
United Future Party's leader Peter Dunne wanted Parliament to
strike section 92A entirely from the new copyright bill
through an arcane legal maneuver which would have required
the Governor General to quash the provision. ACT Party
leader Rodney Hyde also joined in the chorus calling for
repeal of the section while he castigated the previous Labour
government for its "poor" drafting of the Bill. Both United
and ACT are current members of the National led coalition
government.
¶4. (SBU) In reaction, a core panel was formed within the
Cabinet consisting of the Commerce Minister Simon Power,
Communications/IT Minister Steven Joyce, Broadcasting
Minister Jonathan Coleman and Attorney General Chris
Finlayson to develop a game plan and dampen the negative
publicity. Meanwhile, Dunne had been asked by Simon Power to
consider reformulating the provision in language more
acceptable to the ISPs instead of stripping the law entirely
of its content.
¶5. (SBU) The response developed by the four ministers and
announced by Simon Power as lead was to suspend section 92A
for 30 days during which time the IP rights holders would
hammer out a code of practice with the Telecommunication
Carriers Forum (TCF - industry association representing NZ's
major ISPs - Telecom, Telstra, Vodafone, Kordia and Callplus)
which would serve as the regulatory foundation for section
92A. The law would then go into force at the end of March
and after 90 days it would be reviewed as to its appropriate
application.
Original Text of Section 92A
----------------------------
¶6. (U) Section 92A reads as follows:
Internet service providers (ISP) must have policy for
terminating accounts of repeat infringers
1) An ISP must adopt and reasonably implement a policy that
provides for termination, in appropriate circumstances, of
the account with that ISP of a repeat infringer.
2) In subsection (1), repeat infringer means a person who
repeatedly infringes the copyright in a work by using one (1)
or more of the Internet services of the ISP to do a
restricted act without the consent of the copyright owner.
WELLINGTON 00000088 002 OF 003
Telstra Pulls Out of Negotiations
---------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) Telstra, one of the major New Zealand ISPs,
signaled during the week of March 9 that it was no longer
willing to participate in the negotiations between the
copyright industry and the TCF on development of the code of
practice that would have served as the regulatory foundation
for enforcing section 92A. Press reported rumors that
Telstra's decision to cease cooperation may have originated
from the company's CEO Sol Trujillo who has been reported as
an opponent of similar legislation in Australia. The TCF
tried to continue working on the draft code with the
remaining NZ ISPs (Telecom, Vodafone, Kordia and Callplus).
However, in accordance with the TCF's by laws, unless there
is unanimous agreement among all members of the
telecommunications forum then the code of practice would not
be binding but merely voluntary. After Telstra's opting-out,
the remaining stakeholders were unable to come to full
agreement on a useable code of practice. They remained
deadlocked on two "minor" items: how to deal with fees (costs
imposed on rights holder for submitting termination requests)
and the length of time before termination (time between
notice of infraction and cancellation of internet service -
one versus two month lead-time).
GNZ Decides to Rewrite Section 92A
----------------------------------
¶8. (SBU) Minister Power, realizing that the proposed code of
practice could only be voluntary and not applicable to the
second largest ISP in NZ (Telstra) along with the end of
March deadline rapidly approaching, suspended the
negotiations and reasserted the government's authority to
redraft section 92A. In his announcement, Power stressed
that section 92A traverses an important issue in copyright
law reform and reaffirmed the GNZ's stance that internet
piracy is very costly to NZ's creative industries and needs
to be addressed.
¶9. (SBU) On March 23, Minister Power, issued a press release
after the weekly Cabinet meeting announcing that the GNZ
would suspend section 92A as of March 31. (Note: all other
provisions of the new copyright law are in force as of March
31 except but for section 92A. End note). The Government's
action came as a surprise because up to the time of the
Minister's announcement negotiators for both the IPR industry
and the Telecommunications Carrier Forum had said they were
close to finalizing a "voluntary" code of practice.
IPR Industry Expresses Disappointment
-------------------------------------
¶10. (SBU) On March 26, Charge' met with Frank Rittman, Vice
President and General Counsel for Asia Pacific Division of
the Motion Picture Association (MPA) and Tony Eaton, Director
of New Zealand Federation Against Copyright Theft (NZFACT) to
ascertain the IPR industry's reaction to suspension of
section 92A of the NZ Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment
Act 2008 and possible next steps by government, copyright
holders and internet service
providers.
¶11. (SBU) Rittman and Eaton had met earlier with the IP
division of Ministry of Economic Development (MED) charged
with the redraft of Section 92A. MED officials' chief
concern was that MED did not yet have clear instructions from
its political leadership, primarily from the Minister of
Commerce, as to timeline and process. Rittman felt that the
sense of urgency among the IP lawyers in MED was relatively
low and believed that a redraft was unlikely any time sooner
than late December 2009. As to the redrafting process, he
felt that the public's input would be sought - most likely to
diffuse the earlier criticism of lack of transparency in the
original formulation of 92A. Rittman said that the drafters
would need to satisfactorily address four main points:
- Resolve satisfactorily the question of indemnification
(i.e., who bears costs of improper termination).
- Agree to definition of what constitutes an ISP.
WELLINGTON 00000088 003 OF 003
- Ensure that process for notification and termination be
"timely" (IP industry asking for one month between final
warning and termination of internet service while ISPs
seeking two month lead-time).
- Determine who bears processing costs (there is the cost of
processing the notifications to customers for alleged misuse
estimated at approx NZ$100 per notification - will it be
shared or carried by ISPs).
Next Steps
----------
¶12. (SBU) Throughout the final stages of the law's (near)
implementation, the Embassy continued to met with IPR
stakeholders and GNZ officials to ascertain progress and
encourage resolution. To determine how a "workable" section
92A provision can be secured, Econoff met with Rory McLeod,
Director at Ministry of Economic Development (MED) with
responsibility for IPR within GNZ along with Paula Wilson,
Deputy Director for Trade Negotiations at MFAT, and was given
assurance that the government remains committed to redrafting
Section 92A.
¶13. (SBU) Embassy will continue to stress with GNZ officials
the need for a shorter rather than protracted timeline for
the redraft and will ascertain the details of a notice and
comment period for public submissions once released by GNZ.
During this hiatus we've proposed holding DVC(s) between NZ
and U.S. interlocutors to possibly help with drafting and as
a public diplomacy tool to dispel public misperceptions about
proper role of IPR protection. U.S. agencies have the
benefit of 10 years worth of experience in enforcing the U.S.
Digital Millennium Copyright Act that may serve useful to New
Zealand officials in their effort to implement section 92A.
KEEGAN