

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09PANAMA156, PANAMA: MARTINELLI MAINTAINS LEAD BUT LOSES GROUND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PANAMA156.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09PANAMA156 | 2009-02-23 20:19 | 2011-04-11 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Panama |
VZCZCXYZ0021
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHZP #0156/01 0542019
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 232019Z FEB 09
FM AMEMBASSY PANAMA
TO RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RHMFISS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3029
UNCLAS PANAMA 000156
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PM
SUBJECT: PANAMA: MARTINELLI MAINTAINS LEAD BUT LOSES GROUND
TO HERRERA
-------
Summary
-------
¶1. Democratic Change (CD) opposition presidential candidate
Ricardo Martinelli lost six points in the polls, shortly
after naming former Panamenista Party presidential candidate
Juan Carlos Varela as his vice presidential running mate and
thereby cementing a grand opposition "Alliance For Change"
movement, according to Dichter and Neira's presidential poll
for the week of February 15. Martinelli still maintained a
12 point lead over Revolutionary Democratic Party (PRD)
candidate Balbina Herrera, whose stalled campaign appeared to
have been kick started, rallying for a five point gain since
February 1. Martinelli probably also took a hit for not
participating in a debate hosted by a television broadcaster
on February 10; Herrera "debated" solo responding to
questions from journalists. Former President Guillermo
Endara, heading his Moral Vanguard for the Nation (MVN)
party's ticket, stubbornly remains in the race but is trapped
in no man's land at five percent and received fewer votes
than the number of mock ballots left blank in Dichter and
Neira's poll. For all intents and purposes, Panama now has a
head-to-head race for its presidency.
------------------------------------------
Momentum Shifts As Martinelli Loses Ground
------------------------------------------
¶2. When asked who they would vote for if the 2009 elections
were held today, 49 percent of respondents to Dichter and
Neira's latest presidential poll said they supported
opposition candidate Martinelli and 37 percent said they
supported ruling party candidate Herrera. Herrera has gained
five points since February 1, climbing slowly from 32 percent
of voter preference the first week to 33 percent the next,
then gaining steam to finish with 37 percent last week, her
highest numbers since January. Opposition golden boy
Martinelli lost six points, falling from 55 percent in the
first week of February to 53 percent the next, and dropping
still further to 49 percent in the week of February 15, as
some voters clearly migrated to the Herrera camp. It remains
to be seen whether the latest numbers reflected a momentary
dip in the polls for Martinelli or signalled the beginning of
a downward trend. Martinelli's dip in the polls as well as
Herrera's gradual ascent came in the wake of Martinelli's
formation of a grand opposition "Alliance for Change" and his
refusal to debate Herrera on February 10; Herrera "debated"
solo responding to journalists' questions.
¶3. Contrary to Dichter and Neira's more recent data, the
three other monthly polls indicated that Martinelli pulled
further ahead of Herrera in February, but only by three to
five points. The three other polls also showed that Herrera
gained from three to five percent of voter preference in the
last month: According to IPSOS, Martinelli now leads by 17
points, up from a 12 point lead in January. Martinelli
gained ten points to win 51 percent of voter preference and
Herrera gained five points to capture 34 percent of voter
preference. (Polling took place February 6 to 8 and included
1,040 people. The margin of error was three percent.)
According to SigmaDos, Martinelli led by a more modest eight
points in February, up from a five point lead in January.
SigmaDos gave Martinelli 48 percent of voter preference,
representing a six point gain from January, while Herrera
garnered 40 percent, a three point gain for her from the
previous month. (The poll included 1,428 people and had a
margin of error of 2.6 percent.) According to Unimer,
Martinelli led by 22 points in February, up from 18 points in
January. Unimer gave Martinelli 50 percent of voter
preference, up seven points from January, and Herrera held
28.5 percent of voter preference, up three points from
January. (Polling took place February 4 to 6 and included
2,500 people. The margin of error was 2.8 percent.)
---------------------------
Herrera Base Remains Strong
---------------------------
¶4. Herrera has maintained the strongest base of committed
voters since Dichter and Neira's polling began in January.
In the latest poll for the week of February 15, when asked
who they would vote for if elections were held today, 31
percent of PRD party members said they would vote for
Herrera, while 25 percent of CD party members would vote for
Martinelli. Herrera also rallied the highest number of
committed voters according to the SigmaDos monthly poll,
where of those who support Herrera, 91 percent said they
would definitely vote for her. Of those who support
Martinelli, 86 percent said they would definitely vote for
him. When asked in the second week of February if they
believed that the National Assembly would be dominated by the
parties that supported Herrera or the parties that supported
Martinelli, 40.3 percent stated that the parties that
supported Herrera would dominate, while only 33.8 percent
stated it would be parties who supported Martinelli.
---------------------------
Effect of Varela as VP Pick
---------------------------
¶5. Martinelli's selection of former presidential candidate
Juan Carlos Varela of the Panamenista Party (PP) as his
vice-presidential running mate appeared to give him an
initial boost in the Dichter and Neira poll, taking him from
46 percent of voter preference in the last week of January to
55 percent in the first week of February, representing a nine
point gain. However, Martinelli's numbers have steadily
declined since then, indicating that voters may not view the
alliance favorably on further reflection. In the first week
of February, when asked if an alliance between CD and
Panamenista Party was intended to benefit the country or was
an electoral strategy to win votes, 50.8 percent of
respondents felt that it was a strategy to win votes. In the
most recent Dichter and Neira poll for the week of February
15, the same period corresponding to a four point drop in
voter preference for Martinelli, when asked whether they
believed that political alliances were principally for the
benefit of the country or the politicians, 61.4 percent said
that they were for the benefit of the politicians. There was
no significant boost in numbers as a result of the
Panamenista Party joining the CD, the Patriotic Union (UP),
and Movement of Liberal Republican Nationals (MOLIRENA) in
the Martinelli-led "Alliance for Change." Dichter and Neira
showed a six point loss and, according to the monthly polls,
Martinelli made a modest three to five point gain over
Herrera from January to February.
--------------------------------
Importance of Candidate Platform
--------------------------------
¶6. When asked in the second week of February whether the
candidates' platforms were important or irrelevant when
voting, a whopping 85.7 percent of those polled responded
that they were indeed important. This sentiment on the part
of voters may have played into Martinelli's recent six point
slide. Martinelli's refusal to participate in the February
10 presidential debate gave Balbina Herrera an hour of prime
time media coverage to sell her platform, and was viewed by
320,000 Panamanians. Just after the debate, according to the
Dichter and Neira poll for the week of February 15, when
asked whether they approved or disapproved of Martinelli's
failure to participate in the debate, 66.3 percent of voters
indicated their disapproval; voter preference for Martinelli
dropped another four points during this time.
------------------
The Navarro Effect
------------------
¶7. When asked in the second week of February whether they
believed that criticism of incumbent President Martin
Torrijos by Herrera's VP running mate and PRD National
Executive Committee (CEN) member Juan Carlos Navarro helped
or hurt Herrera's presidential ambitions, 70 percent of
respondents stated that the criticism had a negative effect.
Interestingly, when asked the following week who in the PRD
party would be in the best position to unify the PRD after
the elections, 31.6 percent of respondents felt it would be
Herrera, while a virtually equal number felt that Juan Carlos
Navarro would be a better unifier, at 31.2 percent.
------------------
Voters Pessimistic
------------------
¶8. When asked in the second week of February whether the
country was or was not on a good path, 64.4 percent of
respondents felt that Panama was not on a good path, while
only 29.8 percent felt that the country was headed in the
right direction.
--------------
Technical Data
--------------
¶9. Third Dichter and Neira February poll: Dichter and Neira
conducted 1,226 interviews of men and women over the age of
18 who are residents of Panama. The poll was conducted
nationally, except in the remote and difficult to reach
Darien Province and indigenous people's autonomous regions
(comarcas). Interviews were conducted face-to-face in
individuals' homes from Friday, February 13 to Sunday,
February 15. Sampling was multi-staged. The first stage
distributed the total sample according to population by
province as well as rural and urban precincts, and in the
second stage blocks were randomly selected and homes were
first randomly and then systematically selected. The margin
of error for the poll was assessed at /- 2.9 percent with a
confidence level of
95 percent.
¶10. Second Dichter and Neira February poll: Dichter and
Neira conducted 1,229 interviews of men and women over the
age of 18 who are residents of Panama. The poll was
conducted nationally, except in the remote and difficult to
reach Darien Province and indigenous people's autonomous
regions (comarcas). Interviews were conducted face-to-face
in individuals' homes from Friday, February 6 to Sunday,
February 8. Sampling was multi-staged. The first stage
distributed the total sample according to population by
province as well as rural and urban precincts, and in the
second stage blocks were randomly selected and homes were
first randomly and then systematically selected. The margin
of error for the poll was assessed at /- 2.9 percent with a
confidence level of 95 percent.
STEPHENSON