

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06PARIS2242, VISIT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL GONZALES FROM MARCH 1 TO
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06PARIS2242.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06PARIS2242 | 2006-04-05 15:17 | 2010-11-30 21:30 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Paris |
VZCZCXRO3289
RR RUEHAG RUEHDA RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLN RUEHLZ
RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHFR #2242/01 0951517
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 051517Z APR 06
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6002
RUEAWJA/DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WASHDC
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 PARIS 002242
SIPDIS
DOJ PLEASE PASS TO OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, CRIMINAL
DIVISION (FRONT OFFICE, COUNTER-TERRORISM SECTION, OFFICE OF INTERNAT
AFFAIRS)
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KJUS FR KJUS PREL PGOV KCRM PTER
SUBJECT: VISIT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL GONZALES FROM MARCH 1 TO
4, 2006.
REF: NONE
¶1. (U) SUMMARY: Attorney General Alberto Gonzales traveled to
France from March 1 to 4, 2006. He met with Pierre de
Bousquet de Florian, Director of the DST; Nicolas Sarkozy,
Minister of the Interior; French Counter-terrorism
Officials; Ron Noble, Secretary General of Interpol; Pascal
Clement, Minister of Justice and a number of media and
opinion maker representatives. The meetings were cordial
and constructive and focused on counter-terrorism
cooperation; with the Attorney General expressing
appreciation to his counterparts for the excellent working
relationship between France and the United States in this
area; and his making a number of appearances with the media
and opinion makers to explain to the French public the
United States approach to combating terrorism. END SUMMARY.
¶2. (SBU) After a March 1 evening arrival, on March 2, the
Attorney General met with Pierre de Bousquet de Florian,
director of the DST, France's internal security service.
Both the Attorney General and de Bousquet complimented US-
French C/T cooperation, calling it "exceptional," and
recognizing that both countries were fighting a common
enemy, and both had experienced losses. France's C/T fight
was led by intelligence agencies working in concert with
the judiciary, said Bousquet. Although France did not
pretend that its model could be applied elsewhere, it
strongly believed that judiciary and police/intelligence
services needed to cooperate closely in order to attack
terrorist networks before they struck.
¶3. (SBU) In response to questions from the Attorney
General concerning the DST's view of the evolving nature of
the terrorist threat, de Bousquet expressed a concern that
democracies not compromise their essential values in
combating terrorism as this could weaken the foundation of
their societies. Most important, said Bousquet, was to win
the battle of communication. Videos of USG actions were a
continuing source of motivation and repulsion for
extremists. Although USG communication regarding terrorism
was focused on convincing its citizens, images of abuses in
Iraq and the messages of the USG as received overseas both
rebounded negatively overseas and encouraged Muslim youth
to join extremist movements, said Bousquet.
¶4. (SBU) Bousquet said France was most concerned about
the worldwide upsurge of radical Islam. For this reason,
the GOF was building a "French Islam" a moderate Islam
that worked within the French culture. All those who
refuse to participate in this system would have no place in
French society, said Bousquet. He believed that the next
generation of terrorists would be born and well-integrated
into French society, since well-educated and integrated
French Muslims were already beginning to be seen in
jihadist circles. He called for continued close
coordination between intelligence and police agencies, and
asked that the Attorney General look into streamlining
current procedure for passing telephone and Internet
communication details based in the United States and needed
for investigations in France.
¶5. (SBU) The Attorney General also met Minister of the
Interior Sarkozy. Also present for the Ministry of the
Interior were Diplomatic Advisor David Martinon, Legal
Advisor Sylvie Smanniotto, and DST Director de Bousquet de
Florian. Sarkozy complained that the Ministry of the
Interior felt cooperation in terrorism matters with the
United States were one sided. He declined to give further
specifics Attorney General Gonzales stated that if Sarkozy
had a specific complaint, he should feel free to call him
directly. [Note: Subsequent discussion with de Bousquet
and Sarkozy's staff yielded apologies and assurances that
GOF-USG CT cooperation is, and is seen as, good.]
¶6. (SBU) Sarkozy also signaled that he was under pressure
to remedy the current inability of France to produce
biometric visas in conformity with recent U.S. legislation,
so as to participate in the visa waiver program. [Note:
Septel on recent biometric passport developments.]
¶7. (SBU) Sarkozy also discussed general geopolitical
issues concerning France and the United States. He
believed France should not be in an adversarial posture
with the U.S. and should change its approach. The U.S. is
an important friend and ally of France, the level of
PARIS 00002242 002 OF 004
convergence of interest is much greater than with major
non-democratic powers like Russia or China. While he was
constrained by the current government's policies, he
believed the situation would change after the election. He
indicated he would travel to the U.S. to be able to tell
the French public what his impressions were of the U.S. and
that he would provide more detail on his positions as his
run for the French presidency advanced. Sarkozy stated
that France and the international community would have to
help the United States resolve the situation in Iraq, as
the U.S. could not do so alone; perhaps with international
forces eventually replacing the U.S.
¶8. (SBU) On the morning of March 3, Ambassador Stapleton
hosted a breakfast for the Attorney General and four key
French counter-terrorism officials, counter-terrorism
investigative judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere, Prosecutor
General of Paris Yves Bot, Prosecutor of Paris Jean-Claude
Marin, and Director of the Criminal Division of the Justice
Ministry Jean-Marie Huet. The Attorney General started the
discussion by thanking the officials for their assistance
and asked them for their assessment of the current counter-
terrorism situation. Led by the commentaries of Judge
Bruguiere, the officials noted the advantages they operated
under, including their ability to protect the sources of
intelligence information that they use in their
investigations, the fact that they do not need to detail
facts to the same extent as in the U.S. to arrest persons,
or undertake searches and seizures or wiretaps, and the
fact that there was no jury system, no formal rules on
admissibility of evidence and no hearsay rule. There
followed a general legal discussion on these aspects of the
French system.
¶9. (SBU) Judge Bruguiere also outlined the two general
threat trends France was experiencing: First, that French
youth were being drawn into terrorist activities to a
greater extent, reflecting that the threat was moving from
East to West. Second, that the new terrorists were on an
increasing level of sophistication and education. Recent
arrests had demonstrated that highly educated electronics
experts had been recruited by jihadist networks for
purposes of executing attacks in Europe, and that they had
developed highly sophisticated methods for detonating
explosive charges at long distance.
¶10. (SBU) The Attorney General next met with Ron Noble,
Secretary General of Interpol, on March 3. The discussion
SIPDIS
commenced with the Attorney General inquiring about the
recent request for Interpol red notices made by Italy
concerning the alleged abduction of an individual from
Italy by USG officials. Noble advised that the procedure
at this stage is for Interpol to review the requests to
determine whether issuance of the red notices would be
consistent with the Interpol Constitution, which prohibits
Interpol from participating in political matters, or
pursuing politically motivated requests.
¶11. (SBU) Noble also briefed the AG on a number of current
issues, including a push to list with Interpol those al-
Qaida and Taliban members on the UN sanctions list so that
Interpol could generate a new kind of notice providing
details on these persons to police in member states, and to
facilitate wider contribution to and use of the Interpol
database on lost or stolen passports. Regarding
lost/stolen passports, a pilot project conducted between
Interpol and the Swiss government demonstrated that the
Interpol database could be used in real-time, leading to a
marked increase in the seizures and prosecutions for those
using false travel documents. He cited the example of one
seized passport that had been in use since April 2003, had
passed through 19 countries and had successfully gone
through border controls 46 times without being caught.
¶12. (SBU) Noble requested that the Attorney General
consider detailing a legal attach/prosecutor to Interpol
headquarters, given the rise in legal issues in recent
years. The Attorney General expressed concern that a DOJ
prosecutor might have to address cases that would
conceivably work against USG interests. Noble replied that
the DOJ prosecutor would always have the option of recusing
him/herself.
¶13. (U) Embassy Paris also organized three press events
for Attorney General Gonzales on March 3: a print press
PARIS 00002242 003 OF 004
roundtable, an interview with Radio France Internationale,
and an interview with French all-news channel LCI-TV.
Major French newspapers as well as wire services Agence
France Presse, Reuters, and Associated Press, attended his
print press roundtable. The AG took numerous questions on
Guantanamo and detainee treatment. He explained the
differences between treatment of detainees on a battlefield
and prisoners in the criminal justice system and
underscored that the U.S. treats detainees humanely and in
accord with Geneva even if they do not come under the
Geneva Convention since they are unlawful combatants. Wire
reports quoted AG Gonzales as saying: "The relationship
between French and U.S. law enforcement is outstanding,"
and, "Both countries share the common objective of
preventing terrorist attacks." The press roundtable also
triggered articles in center-left daily Libration
(circulation: 158,086) and Catholic daily La Croix
(circulation: 102,022). La Croix highlighted that, "Four
years after 9/11, the determination of the U.S. government
has not faltered when it comes to fighting against terror."
¶14. (U) Excerpts of his interview with the French
worldwide broadcasting radio network Radio France
Internationale (RFI-- similar to Voice of America) aired on
March 3, and the interview was aired in full in RFI's
weekly Wednesday, RFI English service program "Voices." In
the radio interview, AG Gonzales was asked about the CIA
flights controversy, and he emphasized that the U.S. is a
nation of laws that respects its legal commitments.
¶15. (U) The all-news television network LCI featured the
full interview in its "News of the World" program, which
was re-broadcast three times the same evening. The
Attorney General was asked about his visit to Paris, the
use of death penalty in Texas when President Bush was
governor -- AG referred to the due process of law accorded
the prisoners, and the possible death penalty for Zacharias
Moussaoui who, the AG said, has pleaded guilty and his
sentence will be decided by the Court.
¶16. (SBU) The Attorney General met with French Justice
Minister Pascal Clement on March 3. The two complimented
U.S.-French cooperation as "very good" on terrorism and
other legal matters. The Attorney General said Interior
Minister Sarkozy had complained that counter-terrorism
information sharing was not as robust as it could be, to
which Clement responded that in his opinion, information
sharing between U.S. and France was good. They compared
notes on the different French and U.S. legal systems. The
Attorney General reassured Clement that any information
provided by France for the Moussaoui trial would not be
used to support a death penalty conviction. He also
invited Clement to the United States. Clement thanked the
Attorney General and said he would be pleased to do so when
their schedules permitted.
¶17. (SBU) Clement hailed the U.S. and France's mutual
exchange of magistrates as a way to ward off any budding
legal problems between the two countries. He said the lack
of major problems to discuss was a fruit of this type of
exchange. Clement asked the AG when the U.S. would ratify
the Council of Europe Cybercrime Convention, noting that
France had recently done so. The AG stated that he hoped
we would be able to overcome final Senate objections soon
and get the treaty ratified. They also discussed a number
of other issues, including the sex offenses, and
psychiatric testimony, child abduction cases, and growing
illegal drug use. At the conclusion of the meeting, the
ministers had a walk-out for the press, in which they
delivered statements regarding the issues discussed. The
Clement statement included mention of the assurance
provided by the U.S. that the evidence provided by France
in the Moussaoui case would not be used to obtain the death
penalty.
¶18. (U) This visit provided a good opportunity for Attorney
General Gonzales to both meet in depth key French law
enforcement officials, express U.S. appreciation for the
strong cooperative law enforcement relationship between the
two countries, as well as to explain the French public
through his interviews the United States approach to
combating terrorism. Ambassador Stapleton accompanied the
Attorney General to all of his meetings. The Attorney
General departed on March 4, 2006, for other meetings in
the United Kingdom.
PARIS 00002242 004 OF 004
¶19. (U) This message was approved by the Office of the Attorney
General.
STAPLETON