

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA1522, NEW FOCUS FOR CANADA'S DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA1522.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA1522 | 2005-05-20 15:35 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 OTTAWA 001522
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA/CAN
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAID ECON PGOV SENV CA
SUBJECT: NEW FOCUS FOR CANADA'S DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
REF: A. OTTAWA 1282 NOTAL (ISP ON TRADE)
¶B. OTTAWA 1190 NOTAL (ISP ON NORTH AMERICA)
¶C. OTTAWA 654 NOTAL (DEBT RELIEF)
¶D. OTTAWA 324 NOTAL (DEBT RELIEF
¶E. COMMISSION FOR AFRICA)
¶1. Summary: Canada is focusing its official development
assistance (ODA) dollara and will be weaning 130 countries
from its bilateral aid programs. The April 19 International
Policy Statement (IPS) confirms that Canada, will concentrate
its development assistance dollars on countries that can use
it most effectively. Aid will focus on five sectors the GOC
considers essential to meeting the Millennium Development
Goals (MDG) and that it believes Canada can support most
effectively, and all programs will be designed with an eye to
promoting gender equality. Within five years, CIDA would
like 67% of bilateral aid to go to 25 "development partners"
as programs in other countries are phased out.
¶2. Although the Prime Minister reiterated the GOC's
decades-old goal of reaching an official development
assistance (ODA) level of 0.7% of GNI, from about 0.26% now,
the GOC has not set a target date. The new policy statement
should make it easier to identify areas of bilateral
cooperation with Canada's International Development Agency
(CIDA). End Summary.
More aid money
--------------
¶3. The Development section of Canada's April 19
International Policy Statement (IPS) contained few surprises
but attracted a surprising amount of (mainly) positive
publicity. Minister Aileen Carroll described the IPS to a
Senate committee on May 11 as an "exciting process" and an
"excellent piece of work," that identifies a niche that
allows CIDA to truly make a difference in the world. The
IPS, initiated by Paul Martin on taking office in November,
2003, confirmed that Canada will continue to increase aid
levels by 8% a year and still plans to double aid to Africa
by 2008-09 (from 2003-04 levels).
¶4. Speaking before the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee,
Minister Carroll explained that the IPS, in addition to
continuing the commitment to increase aid levels by 8% a
year, will accelerate that growth as the fiscal situation
permits. Note: Refs A & B described other elements of the
four-pronged IPS. The text of the policy statement is
available on CIDA's website (among other locations) at
www.acdi-cida.gc.ca . End note.
Focus on five sectors and a theme
---------------------------------
¶5. The IPS introduces a "development partner" paradigm and
specifies five sectors on which Canada's ODA will be
concentrated. All ODA will have the cross-cutting theme of
promoting gender equality.
The sectors of focus are:
-- good governance,
-- health (with a focus on HIV/AIDS),
-- basic education,
-- private sector development and
-- environmental sustainability.
The sectors were selected because they:
-- advance the Millennium Development Goals;
-- support developing countries' expressed needs and
priorities; and
-- are areas in which Canada and Canadians can "add value."
¶6. To support good governance, CIDA will draw on the new
Canada Corps, created to "involve Canadians of all ages and
backgrounds," in partnership with NGOs and the private
sector, to increase engagement in "governance interventions
abroad." The private sector development effort, which is
relatively new to CIDA, will follow up on the March 2004
Martin-Zedillo report (the Commission on the Private Sector
and Development). Environmental sustainability was
considered as a crosscutting theme, but was found to be a
better fit as a separate sector.
More money to fewer countries
-----------------------------
¶7. CIDA plans to focus its efforts and resources on fewer
countries -- 25 "development partners," down from 155 current
bilateral aid recipients. (Note: The target countries are
listed at the end of this message. End note.) The IPS
expands a policy initiated in 2002 of increasing support for
countries with the ability to use aid effectively. The 25
"development partners" were selected on the basis of poverty
(generally meaning per capita income of less than US$1,000 a
year), ability to use aid effectively, and a legacy of
Canadian involvement. The number of target countries was not
pre-set and CIDA managers expected between 20-30 countries to
qualify. Of the 25 countries, most are in Africa and 18 have
per capita income under $500 per year. Programs in current
aid recipient countries that are not target countries will be
gradually phased out over time, but may continue to receive
Canadian assistance through multilateral funding.
What if you don't make the cut as a development partner?
--------------------------------------------- ----------
¶8. The 25 "development partner" countries are expected to
receive two-thirds of bilateral development assistance funds
by 2010 (up from 42% now), but the other 130 current aid
recipients won't be abandoned. The remaining third of
bilateral aid funds will cover assistance to failed and
fragile states (Afghanistan, Iraq, Haiti, Sudan) and ongoing
bilateral relationships with countries that don't qualify as
development partners, but in which Canada has a strategic
interest. Some current aid recipient countries (such as
Thailand) are expected to graduate to middle-income status
and the relationship will evolve from one of assistance to
cooperation on mutual interests. Other countries will
continue to receive Canadian aid that is funneled through the
multilateral organizations as bilateral relationships end.
Multilateralism is a theme throughout the IPS, and
multilateral organizations currently distribute about 40% of
GOC aid.
The 0.7% Solution: Someday?
---------------------------
¶9. Most press attention focused on the target of 0.7% of
gross national product (GNI) for ODA, and the fact that the
GOC did not commit to a date for reaching that target. The
issue has particular resonance in Canada because former Prime
Minister Lester Pearson introduced the 0.7% target. The IPS
restates the GOC's long-term commitment to reaching the 0.7%
of GNI goal, but acknowledges that Canada is not at that
level. Martin, in his pre-release statement on April 18,
reiterated support for the 0.7% of GNI goal, but stressed
that Canada is not "in a position to make an unalterable
guarantee as to that it will hit that target by 2015."
¶10. International Cooperation Minister Aileen Carroll (the
head of CIDA) made similar statements to parliamentarians and
in news interviews. In response to a senator's query about
whether Canada wouldn't set a better example by identifying a
date to meet the 0.7% target, Carroll agreed that quantity is
important, but stressed that how Canada gives is, too.
According to the OECD, Canada's ODA increased 12.2% in real
terms from 2003-2004, reaching about 0.26% of GNI.
¶11. Media reports juxtapose the GOC's position with Canada's
solid GDP growth, large annual fiscal surpluses, and the fact
that 11 other countries, many of them less prosperous, have
made a commitment to the 0.7% target. When economist
Jeffrey Sachs visited Canada last year, the media focused on
his bemused response to the GOC's explanation that Canada
could not boost its GDP percentage of foreign aid because the
economy is growing too fast.
¶12. Canada takes a leading role on development assistance
and is active in calling for debt relief for poor countries
(refs C & D), but officials have trouble breaking through the
press, public and politicians' attachment to the 0.7% target.
CIDA officials reiterated that Canada has gone beyond its
Monterrey promise, and they are confident they can do what
they have announced.
Bad timing, but robust policy
-----------------------------
¶13. CIDA distributes about 70% of Canada's ODA, with the
rest funneled through programs managed by the departments of
Finance (to IFIs), Foreign Affairs and other agencies. With
155 recipients, Canada had the most dispersed aid program of
all donors. Over time, an increasing share of funding to
development partners will be direct budget support (although
CIDA would not be comfortable providing budget support in all
cases).
¶14. Canada's 2005 budget, tabled in March, called for an
increase in development assistance of C$3.4 billion (about
US$2.7 billion) over five years with the goal of doubling
assistance from 2001-02 levels. That continues the past
years' commitment to increasing aid by 8% a year, with half
of that increase going to Africa, and includes C$172 million
(about US$138 million) for an initiative (announced in
February) to provide 100% debt relief over the next five
years for poor countries (Refs C & D). The opposition
parties to the right and left of the government have both
called for increases in Canada's ODA and endorsed the 0.7%
target. The IPS commits 5% of Canada's R&D spending to
research into development challenges.
¶15. Unfortunately, release of the IPS coincided with an
outburst of political gamesmanship as the ruling Liberal
Party and the Opposition parties tussled over the future of
the Liberal minority government. The government's successful
maneuvering to avoid a no-confidence vote over the budget
included a deal with the much smaller NDP to increase
spending on social issues, including an additional C$500
million over two years for foreign aid. Yesterday's
successful passage of the budget will both avert immediate
elections and provide a welcome increase of an additional 8%
a year for CIDA.
¶16. When asked about the prospects for the policy statement
should an election be called (which is still possible in the
fall), CIDA officials said that they consider this document
to be robust. The IPS reflects international (and Canadian)
consensus on the key development problems, and it supports
the MDG and the Paris Declaration on aid effectiveness, which
have widespread political support.
All publicity is good publicity?
-------------------------------
¶17. CIDA officials were pleasantly surprised by how positive
the reception of the development section of the IPS has been.
The outline of the development policies has been known since
January, but the list of target countries was new. On the
IPS's release, a high percentage of media coverage touched on
the development segment, with the list of partner countries
and the debate over 0.7% gaining the most attention. Private
sector partners have been positive, with very little
pushback.
¶18. CIDA cited the effective "interdepartmental effort on
electronics" (use of the Internet) as an asset in spreading
the word on the IPS. Traffic on CIDA's website was up by 50%
when the IPS was released, but there were very few phone
calls or e-mails to Public Affairs, indicating that people
were finding the information they needed on line.
Inter-agency coordination
------------------------
¶19. When asked about the IPS's interagency process in
coordinating international policy, CIDA officials point out
that the links between the "3 Ds" (Diplomacy, Development,
and Defense) are most clear in the crisis countries such as
Afghanistan and Haiti, and emphasized that such coordination
will continue. The IPS calls for a "whole-of-government"
approach to development that will coordinate policy on issues
such as debt relief, trade, and environmental problems with
other agencies. START, the newly-created Stabilization and
Reconstruction Taskforce led by Foreign Affairs Canada, will
supplement the current coordination among ministries with a
physical office at FAC, staffed by representatives from each
agency. It will be backed up by CIDA's new "Canada Corps" of
private sector experts.
¶20. The formal policy coordination process is through the
Global Affairs cabinet committee, backed up by committees at
the Deputy Minister and the Assistant Deputy Minister level.
The IPS also commits the GOC to provide an annual
international policy update to parliament, in which CIDA will
participate.
Overlap with MCC
----------------
¶21. Like the Millennium Challenge Account, the IPS sets the
goal of channeling development dollars where they will do the
most good and involving recipient countries in designing
programs. Nine Millennium Challenge Account countries are
also target development partners for Canada. Seven current
MCA countries (Armenia, Georgia, Lesotho, Madagascar, Morocco
and Vanuatu) are not on Canada's list. However, recipients
of GOC aid play a less active role than in the MCC and there
is no separate funding for development partners.
Comment
-------
¶22. Preparing the IPS was a grueling process for the GOC,
but perhaps less so for CIDA than for the other international
affairs agencies. It has a clear mandate with strong
domestic consensus on its role and continued in a direction
it chose three years ago. Morale is good, despite pressures.
However, all is not necessarily rosy.
¶23. When asked by Senators on May 11 about complaints that
CIDA officials are risk averse, Carroll confirmed in strong
terms that they are "pathologically risk averse," and
"terrified of the Auditor General." She pointed out that
continued criticism, such as CIDA receives from the Auditor
General, leads to increased levels of auditing and
accountability at the expense of flexibility. She wants to
"deprocess a marvelous agency," and referred to a
conversation she had just had with former U.S. Senator George
Mitchell, who was in Canada pursuing UN reform, about the
need to get more decision making authority to CIDA reps on
the ground and to get more CIDA personnel out in the field.
Our CIDA contacts are tremendously impressed with Minister
Carroll, citing her energy, concern for staff, and efforts to
create an open and collaborative work environment. There is
strong support at all levels within CIDA for the IPS's goals.
¶24. List of 25 Canadian Development Partners
---------------------------------------------
Africa: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana,
Kenya, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Rwanda, Senegal,
Tanzania, Zambia
Americas: Bolivia, Guyana, Honduras, Nicaragua
Asia: Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka,
Vietnam
Europe: Ukraine
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa
DICKSON