

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON69, TAXES, LAW AND ORDER TOP KEY'S LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON69.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON69 | 2009-03-10 02:26 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO4651
RR RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0069/01 0690226
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 100226Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5790
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1931
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5470
RUEHAP/AMEMBASSY APIA 0547
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0810
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000069
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV KCRM KDEM NZ
SUBJECT: TAXES, LAW AND ORDER TOP KEY'S LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
WELLINGTON 00000069 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) Summary. Prime Minister John Key was quick to enact his
initial legislative agenda after coming to power following the 2008
election. As Key had promised prior to the election, his Government
swiftly passed a tax cut package and a series of stronger law and
order measures. The National-led Government also moved rapidly to
unwind aspects of the previous Labour administration's more
unpopular legislative legacy. Key has been bound by agreements with
minor support parties to introduce or address some contentious
legislation, such as the proposed "three strikes" bill and review of
the Foreshore and Seabed Act. With its clear parliamentary
majority, the Government's legislative program in its first 100 days
progressed comfortably through Parliament. His legislative program
over the medium term is unlikely to yield any surprises. End
Summary.
First Up: Tax Relief
--------------------
¶2. (SBU) Prime Minister John Key's top legislative objective was to
quickly pass into law a tax relief package before the Christmas
recess, in keeping with a promise made during the election
campaign. The tax cut legislation, which also included changes to
the KiwiSaver pension scheme, was comfortably passed on December 11.
The legislation stipulates that the first round of cuts will come
into effect on April 1 2009, with subsequent rounds in 2010 and
¶2011. Despite calls from the opposition Labour Party to suspend the
2009 round on the grounds that the country cannot afford tax cuts in
the current economic climate, Key remains committed to his promise.
Key, however, is unwilling to give a categorical assurance that tax
cuts promised for 2010 and 2011 will go ahead. (Note: If the
Government wishes to defer or abolish future tax cuts it will have
to change its own legislation. End Note).
Early Focus on Law and Order Legislation
----------------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) Strengthened law and order measures have featured
prominently in the Government's first 100 days legislative program.
Key's pre-election position on introducing tougher law and order
measures proved extremely popular with voters anxious about the
rising crime rate under Labour. The Government quickly introduced
legislation to remove the right of the worst repeat violent
offenders to be released on parole. It toughened the bail laws to
make it harder for criminals awaiting trial to get bail. The
Government also moved quickly to bring in legislation to require DNA
testing for every person arrested for an imprisonable offence.
Current Draft of Three Strikes Bill Faces Hurdles
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶4. (SBU) Under its obligation in the supply and confidence
agreement with the hard-right ACT Party, the Government introduced
the controversial Sentencing and Parole Reform Bill. The proposed
legislation, a key ACT Party policy, is a "three strikes and you're
out" measure. It would see those convicted of a third serious
offence sentenced to life imprisonment with a 25-year non-parole
period. National has reserved judgment on whether it will support
the legislation further. Evidence is mounting that the Bill may not
proceed as drafted. Chris Finlayson, in his capacity as
Attorney-General, has found the three-strikes bill has an "apparent
inconsistency" with the section of New Zealand's Bill of Rights
protecting New Zealanders against cruel, degrading or
"disproportionately severe" punishment. Additionally, the Maori
Party, another Government support partner, has come out against the
bill in the belief that the legislation would lead to
disproportionate sentencing. The Maori Party also believes that the
Bill may have a particularly destructive effect on Maori families,
many of whom face a greater chance of having a family member
imprisoned because of the higher rate of Maori criminal recidivism.
¶5. (SBU) In its March 6 editorial, The New Zealand Herald called
the three-strikes policy flawed as a means of lowering the crime
rate and called for the legislation's rejection by a parliamentary
select committee. The newspaper urged the Government to fine-tune
its law and order policy to find "the right balance between
punishing criminals, safeguarding society from those who present too
great a risk and providing rehabilitation carrots."
Three Strikes Bill Generates Prison Funding Debate
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶6. (SBU) The cost of implementing the three strikes legislation has
also become a source of debate. Although the Government has not
released any figures surrounding the cost of implementing the
WELLINGTON 00000069 002.2 OF 003
legislation, the advocacy group Rethinking Crime and Punishment Now
estimated the cost of implementation (based on its the prediction
that new prisons will have to be subsequently constructed to house
greater inmate numbers) at around NZD 7.5 billion over 25 years, and
an ongoing extra operational cost at NZD 1 billion a year. Key,
however, disputed these figures. He argued that the Bill will not
necessarily effect a increase in near term prison numbers, as the
law change would not be retrospective and by the time an offender
was going to jail for a serious offence for a third time they would
already be getting a long sentence. Said Key, "(offenders) can't
just get put away for stealing chewing gum, they have to have a
conviction for a serious offence." The Government is, however,
presently considering allowing private-sector operational management
of some New Zealand prisons.
GNZ to Review Controversial Foreshore Law
----------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) As part of National's confidence and supply agreement with
the Maori Party, Key will establish a three-person panel to complete
a ministerial review of the controversial Foreshore and Seabed Act
by July 2009. For the Maori Party, the Foreshore and Seabed Act is
critical. The Act was passed by the Labour Government in 2004 and
confirmed Crown ownership of New Zealand's foreshore and seabed in
perpetuity. As a result, tens of thousands of Maori marched on
parliament in protest against the law which was viewed by many as a
"land grab," taking away private land and customary rights from
Maori. Then-Labour MP Tariana Turia left the party in protest at
the legislation and formed the Maori Party. The Maori Party will
not be satisfied unless the Foreshore and Seabed Act is repealed.
Even before coming power, Key recognized the Maori Party's concerns
over the Act and had promised to undertake a review of law. The
National Party, however, remains committed to its position that it
would only agree to the Act's repeal if there were appropriate
protection in place to ensure all New Zealanders enjoy access to the
foreshore and seabed, either through existing and potentially new
legislation.
Unwinding Controversial Labour Legislation
------------------------------------------
¶8. (SBU) The Key administration has moved quickly to address some
controversial laws enacted or strengthened under the previous Labour
government. National swiftly repealed the highly controversial
Electoral Finance Act (EFA) passed in 2007 to establish strict laws
governing financial contributions to politics. The EFA prompted the
most acrimonious debate in modern New Zealand politics with
then-Labour Prime Minister Helen Clark accused of advancing the
legislation for her party's own narrow political purposes.
Paradoxically, Clark's successor as Labour Party leader and early
backer of the EFA, Phil Goff, expressed regret for the law's
enactment and ordered his MPs to vote for its repeal. Out of the
122 MPs, only the nine Green Party members voted against the repeal.
¶9. (SBU) National also moved promptly to address an existing law
which was controversially strengthened under the Clark
administration, the Resource Management Act (RMA). The RMA was
introduced in 1991 to oversee building and development projects from
those of national significance down to local council plans and small
scale building on individual properties. Under Clark, the law was
extended to increase regulation which, inadvertently, invited a rash
of frivolous objections to developments. Prior to the election, Key
had called the RMA a "handbrake on growth." He quickly introduced
legislation to reform the RMA to create greater certainty around
developments and stalled projects, and to "unlock that lost growth
potential and untangle the red tape suffocating everyone from
homeowners to business." Part of the newly proposed legislation to
reform the RMA involves the establishment of a new Environmental
Protection Authority to expedite consents for major building and
infrastructure projects.
Comment
-------
¶10. (SBU) The Key administration's legislative agenda in its first
100 days progressed through parliament with little disruption. This
was largely due to its clear voting majority provided by National's
support parties and popular public support for the proposed
legislation, all of which was well-telegraphed in advance. However,
having exhausted his campaign legislative promises Key has not
clearly stated what his legislative program will look like in the
near term. Differences over the three-strikes legislation will test
the National's relationship with ACT and the Maori Party, but it
will not derail the Government's hard-hitting law and order program.
WELLINGTON 00000069 003.2 OF 003
Additionally, the Foreshore and Seabed Act review may further test
the National-Maori Party relationship, but not likely to the extent
of causing it significant harm. Key has proved to be a pragmatic
consensus-builder and looks fully capable of weathering encroaching
legislative storms. End Comment.
Keegan