

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07STATE157671, U.S. RESPONSE TO EU DRAFT CODE OF CONDUCT FOR
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07STATE157671.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07STATE157671 | 2007-11-17 01:26 | 2011-05-02 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Secretary of State |
VZCZCXRO8957
OO RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHC #7671/01 3210137
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O R 170126Z NOV 07
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON IMMEDIATE 4876
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON IMMEDIATE 3344
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS IMMEDIATE 5748
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA IMMEDIATE 9234
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS IMMEDIATE
INFO DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE COLLECTIVE
EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 2177
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 9606
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 STATE 157671
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CDG EC ESA EUN FR KACT KTIA MCAP PARM PO PREL TSPA
UK
SUBJECT: U.S. RESPONSE TO EU DRAFT CODE OF CONDUCT FOR
SPACE OBJECTS
REF: LISBON 002604
¶1. (U) This is an action message. See paragraphs 3 - 6.
¶2. (SBU) BACKGROUND: On October 9, the Portuguese MFA's
Security and Disarmament Division, in its role as chair of
the EU Working Group on Global Arms Control, provided Embassy
Lisbon with a non-paper on a proposed EU "Code of Conduct for
Space Objects" (REFTEL). Portugal requested a U.S. response
in support of an EU-only experts meeting, scheduled for
December 7. Portuguese officials indicated that they also
are soliciting comments from Russia and China.
¶3. (SBU) FOR LISBON: Embassy Lisbon is requested to hand
over the U.S. non-paper (contained in paragraph 5 below) to
the Portuguese Presidency of the EU. Embassy Lisbon is also
authorized to provide a line-in/line-out mark-up version of
original EU non-paper (to be transmitted via e-mail). Embassy
Lisbon should the request that the Portuguese Presidency of
the EU treat both the non-paper and line-in/line-out mark-up
as "Restreint UE." Embassy Lisbon also should indicate that
the U.S. welcomes further exchanges on this topic with
Portugal and future EU Presidencies.
¶4. (SBU) FOR LONDON AND PARIS: Embassies London and Paris are
requested to hand over the U.S. non-paper contained in
paragraph 7 to the UK FCO and the French MFA. Embassies
London and Paris are also authorized to provide HMG and GoF
with the line-in/line-out mark-up version of the original EU
non-paper (to be transmitted via e-mail). Embassies should
indicate that this is the U.S. response to the Portuguese
Presidency's request, and that the U.S. welcomes
opportunities for discussions on specific points at future
bilateral space security dialogue discussions.
¶5. (SBU) FOR USEU: Following handover to Portugal, USEU is
authorized to provide a courtesy copy of the non-paper and
line-in/line-out mark-up to the European Commission.
¶6. (SBU) FOR GENEVA: Following handover to Portugal, USDEL to
the Conference on Disarmament is authorized to provide
courtesy copies of the non-paper and line-in/line-out mark-up
to CD Delegations of EU Member States. Ambassador Rocca is
also authorized to share copies of the non-paper and mark-up
with non-EU members of the CD Western Group (WEOG).
¶7. (SBU) BEGIN TEXT OF U.S. NON-PAPER
United States Non-Paper
November 16, 2007
The United States is pleased to respond to the Portuguese
Presidency,s request of October 9, 2007, for comments on the
European Union's draft Code of Conduct for Space Objects.
The United States welcomes opportunities for substantive
discussions on outer space Transparency and Confidence
Building Measures (TCBMs) with all established and emerging
spacefaring nations.
Such discussions can build upon the shared values expressed
in both the U.S. National Space Policy of August 31, 2006,
and the European Space Policy of May 22, 2007. These values
include our shared and long-standing support for the
principle of free access to, and the use of, space by all
nations for peaceful purposes. They also include our common
interest in using outer space both to maintain international
peace and security and to promote international cooperation
and understanding.
The United States opposes efforts which would link
discussions on pragmatic TCBMs with efforts to negotiate
agreements for preventing the so-called "weaponization of
outer space" or efforts to establish new legal regimes or
other restrictions that seek to prohibit or limit access to,
or use of, outer space for peaceful purposes.
STATE 00157671 002 OF 003
The United States strongly supports efforts to preserve the
space environment and to ensure safe and responsible space
operations. In this regard, we believe that international
cooperation should focus upon voluntary guidelines for safe
space operations. Such guidelines can be applicable to all
peaceful uses of space. The United States believes these
"Best Practice Guidelines" should be developed first in
expert-level discussions involving relevant government and
private sector satellite operators. Where appropriate,
specific guidelines developed in these expert-level
discussions can be the subject of discussions with allies and
like-minded states, and may be submitted to the United
Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space
(COPUOS) for consideration by the broader community of
established and emerging spacefaring nations. Such efforts
can build upon this Committee,s recent successful work on
debris mitigation guidelines, an effort that was greatly
facilitated by the close collaboration between the United
States and European members of COPUOS.
Where appropriate, the United States also is willing to
engage in substantive discussions on proposals for new TCBMs.
The United States welcomes opportunities for expanded
trans-Atlantic dialogue with European experts on possible new
TCBMs. The U.S. also will continue to engage in discussions
with Russia and other spacefaring nations on complementary
bilateral TCBMs that can promote cooperation and reduce
uncertainty in the conduct of safe space operations.
In this regard, the United States views many of the ideas
contained in the European Union draft as constructive
contributions to international discussions on measures that
protect the space environment and protect free access to, and
use of, space for the benefit of all nations. We believe the
EU draft could form the basis for an international consensus
that reflects the shared views of the Euro-Atlantic community.
With an eye toward building such a consensus, the United
States offers the attached comments, which propose the
following changes:
- Throughout the draft, replace references to "Code of
Conduct" with the term "Best Practice Guidelines" to
emphasize the voluntary nature of the proposed measures.
- In the first ("Framework") section, modify wording to:
--Drop linkages between consideration of TCBMs and efforts to
prevent a so-called "weaponization" of outer space;
-- Focus on relevant areas of shared EU-U.S. agreement,
including the 1963 Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the
Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water, instruments of
the International Telecommunication Union, and public release
of comprehensive space policies; and
-- Drop references to measures which suggest that TCBMs must
be connected to space arms control agreements, including UN
General Assembly resolution 61/58.
- In the second section, adapt wording to reflect shared EU
and U.S. support for the "Basic Objectives" of:
-- Ensuring free access to, and use of, outer space by all
nations for peaceful purposes;
-- Preserving freedom of action in space while protecting
critical space capabilities;
-- Recognizing that space capabilities support vital security
and foreign policy interests; and
-- Conducting space activities in accordance with
international law, including the UN Charter.
- In the third section, create an "Operational" subsection
that would:
-- Propose measures for the sharing of space environment data
and for developing standardized data formats for information
exchange;
-- Propose measures that recognize existing and emerging best
practices for human spaceflight safety and collision
avoidance;
-- Replace the measure restricting "any manoeuvre or action"
with a proposed measure to provide notification of other
concerned satellite operators in the event of a spacecraft
malfunction;
-- Clarify language in proposed measures relating to the
intentional creation of debris and mitigation of possibility
STATE 00157671 003 OF 003
SUBJECT: U.S. RESPONSE TO EU DRAFT CODE OF CONDUCT FOR
SPACE OBJEC
of accidents, collision or other forms of harmful
interference;
-- Clarify language in the proposed measure for minimizing
the risk of harmful interference to other nations, space
activities;
-- Clarify language in measures for responding to, and
resolving, harmful interference incidents; and
-- Delete a proposed measure on "special caution areas," a
technically vague concept that could unduly restrict
fundamental rights of passage through, and operations in,
space without interference.
- Also in the third section, create a "Transparency"
subsection that:
-- Proposes a measure encouraging disclosure of basic details
on high-level space policies;
-- Clarifies language in proposed measures relating to space
activity notification and Registration Convention compliance;
-- Removes proposed measures on prior notification of
satellite approaches, which could unduly restrict
fundamental rights of passage through, and operations in,
space without interference;
-- Removes a proposed measure regarding "space weapons,"
which is a term that remains indefinable; and
-- Removes a proposed measure regarding "dual-use character,"
which is also an indefinable concept.
END TEXT OF U.S. NON-PAPER
¶8. (U) Any reporting on this subject should be flagged for
the Department (ISN/MDSP:Richard H. Buenneke) and Geneva (CD).
RICE