

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08WELLINGTON105, POLITICAL OBJECTIVITY OF NZ MEDIA QUESTIONED
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08WELLINGTON105.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08WELLINGTON105 | 2008-03-19 23:29 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO9779
RR RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0105/01 0792329
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 192329Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5153
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1640
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5146
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0654
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000105
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KDEM NZ
SUBJECT: POLITICAL OBJECTIVITY OF NZ MEDIA QUESTIONED
WELLINGTON 00000105 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) Summary. The Labour Government's relationship with the
New Zealand media has become increasingly tense and prompted Prime
Minister Clark to call into question its behaviour and political
objectivity. At the same time, opposition National Party leader
John Key has received lighter press criticism, with Labour's dive in
the February polls given front-page headlines and endless op-ed
commentary suggesting the 2008 election is already over and Key has
won. Political analysts (and some media) admit that Labour simply
produces more grist for media comment than the opposition or minor
parties. Once National begins to unveil more policy and a sense of
how it will govern if elected, the media will provide greater
scrutiny and any perceived notion of uneven media attention will
dissipate. End Summary.
NZ Media Objectivity Called into Question
-----------------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) Since the start of 2008 election year, the Labour
Government and Prime Minister Clark have been regularly subjected to
intense analysis and criticism by New Zealand's media. Conversely,
the opposition National Party and its leader John Key have had far
less scrutiny during this period. In response, the Government has
lashed out repeatedly at the press, characterising the media as less
than well-informed and calling into question journalists'
objectivity. One of the country's most seasoned and well-respected
journalists, Richard Harman, dismissed suggestions of media bias and
offered that this was "par for the course." He noted that in the
run-up to every election since the early 1970s he has been accused
of bias by both major parties.
Fissure in the Labour-Press Relationship
----------------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) Since coming to power in 1999, Labour's relationship with
the press has been reasonably good. However, in 2007 two pivotal
events signalled that the character of this relationship was headed
for a downturn. The first was the introduction of the highly
contentious Electoral Finance Bill legislation, which sought to cap
political campaign spending by an individual or organisation. The
Bill sparked uniform, and often acerbic, press criticism of Clark
and her Government; the media argued it was an abuse of power which
unfairly restricted free speech. Leading the charge was The New
Zealand Herald, the country's most widely read newspaper, which
launched a visceral front-page campaign against Labour for
introducing the Bill. Even though the Bill became law on December
19, 2007, the Herald's campaign continues unabated. The Herald
publishes a monthly 'name and shame' graphic of the Labour MPs who
voted for the Bill.
¶4. (SBU) The second event was a speech Clark gave shortly before
the Electoral Finance legislation became law. Embattled by the
steady diet of press condemnation about the Bill, Clark questioned
the quality and judgment of New Zealand journalism. She asserted
that Kiwi journalists lack general knowledge and are too young to
remember seminal events in New Zealand's history. Citing the
Herald's anti-Electoral Finance bill campaign as an example, Clark
questioned whether journalists are upholding their professional
duties to be truthful, fair and balanced. The Herald was not alone
at the receiving end of Clark's wrath. She also singled out New
Zealand's second largest newspaper, The Dominion Post and the
Political Editor for TV3 News for criticism.
Clark Detects Right-Wing Bias in Some Publications
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶5. (SBU) In addition to questioning the professionalism of some
journalists, Clark also suggested that Labour's difficulty in
attracting positive press reviews in recent times was the result of
an ideological bias against Labour. She believes that The New
Zealand Herald, in particular, lacks objectivity and has a long-held
political prejudice against Labour. On February 27, Clark accused
The Herald of running "a silly campaign" against the Electoral
Finance legislation and added that "it was a Tory paper which has
shown no charity to Labour in the party's 91 years of existence."
The paper rejected claims that its campaign is ideologically driven
and maintained that it is simply fulfilling its role in questioning
authority and meeting its obligation to guard against the outright
abuse of power and constrictions against the freedom of speak.
¶6. (SBU) Clark's assertion of right-wing bias was not limited to
the mainstream publications. In the March edition of the New
Zealand Law Journal, its editor questioned whether free and fair
elections could be held under new election funding rules. The
editor also characterized present conditions in New Zealand under
the new funding rules as "Putinesque." Clark responded by saying
WELLINGTON 00000105 002.2 OF 003
that such comments came as no surprise, given the editor was "at the
opposite end of the political spectrum" from her. (Comment: Clark's
remark is accurate regarding Law Journal editor Bernard Robertson.
End Comment)
Liberal Media Also Critical of Clark
------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) Clark's assessment that competing ideology is behind some
of the media's lack of enthusiasm towards her and Labour can,
however, be challenged by the recent writings of Chris Trotter, New
Zealand's most identifiable left-wing political commentator. Over
the past month, Trotter has been sharply critical of Clark's ability
to lead her party to victory in this year's election. In light of
successive polls showing Labour well behind National in the party
vote and Clark consistently coming in second to Key in preferred PM
polling, Trotter has argued that Labour's only hope of winning the
election is for Defence Minister Phil Goff to replace Clark as party
leader. Another openly left-friendly writer, Matt MacCarten, has
also been as critical of Labour and Clark in recent columns.
Journalist: Boredom Causing Uneven Media interest
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶8. (SBU) An Australian journalist who once reported on NZ politics
for a major Australian newspaper and who also worked for The New
Zealand Herald does believe that there exists an uneven balance of
critical attention towards Clark and her Government at the expense
of Key and his National Party. But according to Australian
journalist Claire Harvey, this bias is not based on ideology. In a
radio interview on March 9, Harvey opined that any bias against
Clark and Labour is largely based on the NZ media's fondness for
political novelty, with John Key representing a fresh face.
Additionally, Harvey posits that NZ reporters implicitly yearn for a
change in political management because they do not want to spend the
next three years continuing to report of yet another Labour
government consisting of many of the some personalities from
previous years. She believes that the NZ press are simply bored
with Clark and Labour and claimed that "everything that needs to be
written about this Labour Government has already been written."
Clark Finds Disfavor, Key Gets a Waiver
---------------------------------------
¶9. (SBU) Whereas the media appear to be relishing the problems
facing Clark and Labour, with front-page banner headlines trumpeting
its recent poor poll results, they seem to be savoring Key and his
party's ascendancy in the polls. Notably, two of New Zealand most
distinguished political commentators have all but anointed Key as
the election victor. In his recent columns, The Herald's John
Armstrong has referenced Key as the "Prime Minister-in-waiting."
His Herald stable mate Colin James, normally seen to be relatively
Labour-friendly, has been found to using "when" when talking about
Key as Prime Minister, not "if." Moreover, in an address to the New
Zealand Institute of International Affairs on March 11, James
forecast that "Clark will likely give way to Key" at this year's
general election. When asked by post to comment on perceived
notions of media bias, James rejected the suggestion that he writes
from one particular ideological perspective.
¶10. (SBU) Key has not been completely free from critical media
scrutiny in recent times. In the week of March 3, Key received
media criticism for a succession of gaffes he made relating to his
misinterpretations of his party's policy and a lack of clarity on
the issue of state asset sales. Some of this criticism from
columnists, however, resembled advice rather than censure. Tracey
Watkins of The Dominion Post, for example, appeared to warn Key that
if he does not lift his game he would wear Labour's "slippery John"
label. Journalists have told Post's Media Specialist that they are
becoming very frustrated with National's lack of stated policy and
its unwillingness to take positions on issues of public interest.
They have noted that Key sometimes has reacted angrily to their
desire to pin down his position on issues and they have wondered
aloud how he will stand up to the rigour of an election campaign.
The NZ Media's Political Influence
----------------------------------
¶11. (SBU) The degree to which mainstream media in New Zealand
influence voting patterns is not fully defined. There is little
capacity for editors and publishers to become political kingmakers
nor is there great receptivity among the New Zealand public. Unlike
in the United States, it is not customary for the mainstream media
to explicitly endorse a candidate for political office. Moreover,
the tighter controls on publishing political opinion, as a result of
WELLINGTON 00000105 003.2 OF 003
the new campaign funding rules, give the press little leeway to take
a biased position. There does exist in New Zealand authentic
political bias in the country's blogosphere, where some of New
Zealand's main political pundits have their own blogs where they
voice a more jaundiced perspective in contrast to their mainstream
media reporting. However, the ability of the Internet to influence
the political landscape is limited because in New Zealand its viral
reach falls far behind that of the mainstream media.
Comment
-------
¶12. (SBU) Clark is no different from most politicians who are
predisposed to blame their political woes on the press.
Nonetheless, her criticism that the media are pacing public opinion
rather that simply reporting it has some validity and has raised
questions from more neutral observers. However, Clark's hypothesis
that the lack of positive stories on Labour and herself is
ideologically motivated is excessive. The media's true bias is
often conflict and political drama, which is most compelling to the
general public - and Labour has provided a series of bad news
stories since late last year that make for good copy and sell
papers. One of Key's advisors also discounts that National is
getting a free ride and has told us that the media can be just as
vicious with National; he anticipates the press will be just as
tough on a National Government, should it win, as they are with
Labour. End Comment.
McCormick