

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE365, AMCHAM'S DISCONTENT: OECD BLACKLISTS COSTA RICA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE365.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE365 | 2009-04-30 22:10 | 2011-03-21 16:30 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0002
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0365/01 1202210
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 302210Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0804
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RAYWEED/AUSTOECD PARIS OECD
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000365
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EEB/IFD/OIA:GHICKS
DEPT FOR WHA/CEN AND WHA/EPSC:AWONG
TREASURY FOR SSENICH
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN ECON PGOV PREL CS
SUBJECT: AMCHAM'S DISCONTENT: OECD BLACKLISTS COSTA RICA
¶1. (U) SUMMARY: Representatives of the American Chamber of Commerce
(AmCham) met with DCM and Emboffs on April 17 to make a strong case
against the recent OECD listing of Costa Rica on the tax haven
"blacklist". They argued that the OECD's decision, which seemed to
ignore the transparency of the 1991 Costa Rican-U.S. Tax Exchange
Information Agreement (TEIA), was totally inappropriate:
substantively incorrect, procedurally mishandled, and politically
motivated. In addition, AmCham expressed dismay at how quickly
Finance Minister Guillermo Zuniga acceded to the OECD listing by
submitting a letter pledging that the GOCR would consider new
legislation eliminating the need for a court order in order to open
bank account records (a prominent OECD complaint). Ostensibly,
Zuniga's action changed Costa Rica's OECD classification from the
"black list" to the "grey list." AmCham -- deeply concerned about
Costa Rica's reputation after the initial OECD announcement --
requested that the USG make a statement on Costa Rica's behalf.
Post countered that Zuniga could raise the issue (at his discretion)
in his meeting with Treasury officials on April 27 (on the margins
of the World Bank meeting in Washington). Of note, the GOCR has not
approached us about the "black list." See Action Request, para 11.
END SUMMARY.
-------------------------
AN EXPERIENCED DELEGATION
-------------------------
¶2. (U) Executive Director Lynda Solar, President Luis Gamboa, and
ex-presidents Humberto Pacheco and Hernan Pacheco represented
AmCham. Given that Humberto Pacheco negotiated the GOCR's TIEA in
the 80's, he led AmCham's presentation. Pacheco seemed personally
offended by the OECD's failure to acknowledge the effectiveness of
the existing TIEA with the US (in effect since 1991) and emphasized
the difficult five-year process of gaining legislative approval for
the TIEA.
¶3. (U) The AmCham representatives' believed the OECD decision was
based on the following factors (which also figured prominently in
local media reporting about the black listing):
-- Costa Rica does not tax overseas income; and
-- Costa Rica requires a court order to be obtained in order to open
any bank account records.
---------------------------
A DELEGATION WITH A MISSION
---------------------------
¶4. (U) AmCham adamantly disagreed with Costa Rica's classification
as a tax haven by the OECD and pressed that there are "no
technically valid reasons" to place Costa Rica on any tax haven
black list for three reasons:
-- Humberto Pacheco noted that a characteristic of a tax haven is
low taxes. Quite the contrary, Costa Rica has a high tax regime;
-- Typical tax havens do not disclose tax information to the proper
foreign counterparts. Pacheco claimed that Costa Rica consistently
cooperated with U.S. counterparts, abided by the TIEA with the US,
and exercised considerable control over its banking system through a
regulator. (NOTE: Pacheco was unaware of any European disclosure
requests. END NOTE.) He stated that, to his knowledge, never in
the history of the TIEA with the United States had a request for
information been denied. That is, judicial permission to access
account information requested by the IRS has always been
forthcoming; and
-- Costa Rica purposely designed its foreign tax regime to eliminate
any appearance of "ring fencing," the issue of treating foreign
source income differently, based on the residency of the taxpayer.
The GOCR made a conscious decision to exempt taxation of all foreign
source income for all taxpayers; thus, the law treats all taxpayers
the same on this issue, which, in Pacheco's words, "is a choice that
the government made. . . very wisely."
¶5. (SBU) In addition to the specific arguments on tax havens,
AmCham cited Costa Rica's role as a good neighbor in the war against
drugs and its fight against money laundering (it passed an
anti-money laundering law earlier this year). AmCham further argued
on the issue of the OECD's "Eurocentric" outlook. AmCham contended
that the four countries on the OECD's black list -- Costa Rica,
Uruguay, Malaysia, and Philippines -- had no ties to Europe. Thus,
the OCED selected easy targets -- countries without direct European
ties -- while overlooking European counties with questionable
practices on bank secrecy, i.e. Belgium, Switzerland, and/or
Luxembourg.
¶6. (SBU) AmCham disapproved of the "easy way out of this," as
proposed by Finance Minister Zuniga, of simply proposing changes in
the law regulating bank secrecy. Hernan Pacheco stated that AmCham
strongly opposed eliminating the requirement that a judge review any
request to open bank account records. Real or perceived abuses of
the power to open bank records, Pacheco added, could do enormous
harm to Costa Rica's democracy by altering Costa Ricans' perceptions
of (and confidence in) government. Furthermore, it isn't clear how
the government would truly guarantee the protection of privacy
rights (without the requirement for a judicial order).
---------------
SAY IT ISN'T SO
---------------
¶7. (SBU) Humberto Pacheco argued that "the US should not have
allowed [Angel] Guria [OECD Secretary General] to denigrate Costa
Rica's reputation, since there is not a technical reason [for Costa
Rica's presence on a black list]". Pacheco noted that the term "tax
haven black list" still lingers in the air, in spite of the OECD
elevating Costa Rica to the "grey list" five days after the "black
list" announcement. Pacheco, the ex-TIEA negotiator, continued,
"We're looking for a face-saving comment from the USG that helps
clear Costa Rica's reputation." "Whatever the inner workings of
this situation," Pacheco continued, "it was made to look like the
G20 originated this." He suggested the following points: "Costa
Rica has a TIEA with the US, has cooperated with the United States,
and has never denied access to requested bank information."
¶8. (SBU) We listened to the presentation and noted that GOCR's
delinquency on many issues, such as passing the anti-money
laundering law, could have played a part in the OECD decision.
Also, the DCM shared some of the findings provided informally to us
by Treasury (TREAS) prior to the AmCham meeting: (1) TREAS is not
comfortable with the OECD list-making, (2) nonetheless, TREAS
generally agreed with OECD's underlying goals, and (3) the US
Internal Revenue Service is reasonably comfortable with Costa Rica's
cooperation through the framework of the TIEA. However, we were
noncommittal about any USG statement in defense of Costa Rica, urged
AmCham to voice their concerns directly to the GOCR, and suggested
that Zuniga raise the issue at his meeting with Treasury on the
margins of the IMF/World Bank meeting April 27. We also said we
would report AmCham's concerns to Washington.
¶9. (SBU) In one notable follow-up, Finance Vice Minister Jenny
Phillips has invited Jeffrey Owens of the OECD's Center for Tax
Policy and Administration to Costa Rica for a review session of the
proposed legislation. The Ministry is girding itself for the
session by publicly noting that several other Latin American
countries also have bank secrecy laws, while stressing the GOCR's
cooperation on information requests.
--------------------------
COMMENT AND ACTION REQUEST
--------------------------
¶10. (SBU) The GOCR evidently does not share AmCham's concerns and
has not approached us. (In fact, we understand that Zuniga did not
discuss the issue during his meetings in Washington). We respect
AmCham's enthusiasm for (and expertise on) this issue, but believe
that the GOCR decided to quickly dispense with the issue by
promising to introduce legislation that would eliminate the need for
a court order to open bank account records. We doubt such
legislation could be passed quickly or easily (if at all) in Costa
Rica, but the pledge alone seemed to have satisfied the OECD.
Though an OECD designation can sully the reputation of a designee,
we understand that a designation carries no penalties or sanctions.
¶11. (SBU) ACTION REQUEST: In the aftermath of the controversy (which
we expect may re-surface here given the pending OECD review session,
we remain interested in others' views of the transparency and
fairness of the OECD ranking process. We would appreciate insight
from the Department, USEU, and/or Treasury. We cannot judge from
here, but AmCham makes a persuasive case against OECD's objectivity.
Why, for example, did the OECD rating seem to discount the
importance of a functioning TIEA between the GOCR and the USG?
CIANCHETTE