

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05SANJOSE2601, MEETING WITH COSTA RICAN MINISTER OF ECONOMY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05SANJOSE2601.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 SAN JOSE 002601
SIPDIS
WHA/CEN
EB FOR WCRAFT, BLAMPRON
EB/CIP FOR WAYALA
WHA FOR WMIELE
WHA/EPSC FOR KURS, LGUMBINER
H FOR JHAGAN
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR RVARGO, NMOORJANI, AMALITO
E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/04/2015
TAGS: ETRD ECPS ECON PREL PGOV SOCI CS
SUBJECT: MEETING WITH COSTA RICAN MINISTER OF ECONOMY
REF: SAN JOSE 02460
Classified By: Charge Russell Frisbie for Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
¶1. (C) Summary. On October 26, 2005, Charge met with
Minister of Economy, Industry, and Commerce Gilberto
Barrantes. Minister Barrantes commented on the status of the
United States-Central American-Dominican Republic Free Trade
Agreement (CAFTA-DR) and related legislation including the
proposed law to strengthen the Costa Rican Institute of
Electricity (ICE). Barrantes stated that the bills that will
implement the changes needed to comply with CAFTA-DR
requirements in the areas of telecommunications, insurance,
and protection of intellectual property rights would be sent
to the Legislative Assembly sometime between now and January
¶2006. The conversation with Barrantes supports post,s view
that it is unlikely the Legislative Assembly will be able to
complete the first of two votes on CAFTA-DR prior to the
upcoming Presidential and Assembly elections on February 5,
2006, and perhaps not even by May 8, 2006 when the new
President and entire Legislative Assembly members (deputies)
will take office. Full approval and implementation of
CAFTA-DR including all necessary changes needed to comply
with the agreement will likely be left to the next
Administration. End Summary.
----------------------------
STATUS OF REVIEW OF CAFTA-DR
----------------------------
¶2. (U) During the October 26, 2005 meeting with the Charge,
Barrantes who also heads President Pacheco's Economic Council
said that Costa Rica is moving forward on CAFTA-DR and the
proof was President Pacheco's sending the trade agreement to
the Assembly on October, 21, 2005 to start the relatively
long ratification process. Barrantes stated that Rolando
Lacle, a deputy from the ruling Social Christian Unity Party
(PUSC) and chair of the Assembly's International Relations
Committee that has the responsibility for reviewing the
agreement said that he will hold committee sessions four or
five times a week to discuss CAFTA-DR. (Note: As required
by law, the legislative project requesting approval of
CAFTA-DR was formally introduced into the Assembly. The
Assembly in principle had five days from October 21 to
discuss and refer the agreement to the International
Relations Committee. However, formal hearings cannot begin
until the entire agreement is published in the Costa Rican
Official Gazette, which could be several more weeks. Further
restricting the window of opportunity, the Assembly likely
will not be in session from approximately December 15 through
the week after the elections, approximately February 13,
¶2006. End Note.)
¶3. (U) Many Costa Rican political experts believe the
International Relations Committee will require at least three
months to (1) review the legislation including the agreement
and associated reports which total more than 3000 pages, (2)
hold discussions with various groups in favor of and against
CAFTA-DR, and (3) send it to the Assembly floor with
recommendations and for a first vote. If passed in the first
vote, the constitutional court will review the agreement and
the legislative procedure used to approve it and offer its
findings. This will take at least one month. (Note: One of
the issues the Constitutional Court will review is the number
of votes required to pass CAFTA-DR. Although most experts
believe only a simple majority is required, some experts
believe that a two-thirds majority is necessary to pass
CAFTA-DR. End Note.) CAFTA-DR will then be sent back to the
Assembly where, if there were no significant findings by the
Constitutional Court, there would be a second vote. In the
case that the Constitutional Court were to have significant
findings, the Assembly would then have to address the Court's
comments accordingly. Even after a successful second vote,
there may still be up to a month for (1) the President to
sign the approving legislation and (2) to publish the
approval in the Official Gazette before the agreement is
considered ratified in Costa Rica. At best, the process will
probably take at least six months.
----------------------------
CAFTA-DR-RELATED LEGISLATION
----------------------------
¶4. (C) Barrantes also said that in November, he, Vice
President Lineth Saborio, Gerardo Gonzalez a PUSC deputy and
President of the Legislative Assembly, and Liliana Salas,
chief of the PUSC party faction in the Assembly, will meet to
discuss the legislative priorities for the Assembly's
extraordinary session that lasts from December 1 through
April 30. They will then send the priority list to President
Pacheco for his review. (Note: During the extraordinary
session, President Pacheco sets the legislative priorities,
as opposed to the ordinary session in which the President of
the Assembly does so. End Note.) Barrantes said that he
believes the list will include the following legislative
initiatives (although he failed to give them any specific
relative priority): (1) CAFTA-DR, (2) a law to implement the
CAFTA-DR requirements regarding the telecommunications
market, (3) a law to implement the CAFTA-DR requirements
regarding the insurance market, (4) legislation approving
loans that would fund CAFTA-DR's corollary complementary
agenda, (5) legislation forming a Costa Rican development
bank to assist development of businesses under CAFTA-DR, and
(6) legislation that would ensure compliance with the
intellectual property rights provisions of CAFTA-DR. (Note:
The only legislation that has been submitted to date are
CAFTA-DR and the complementary agenda funding. End Note.)
¶5. (C) One notable absence on Barrante,s list was that of
the government,s fiscal reform bill. When asked about the
status of this tax bill, Barrantes said that he was not sure
what would happen - that a lot depended on the strategy to be
adopted by Gerardo Gonzalez, the President of the Assembly.
¶6. (C) Barrantes also talked about the proposed law to
strengthen ICE that was sent to the Legislative Assembly on
October 18, 2005, three days prior to sending CAFTA-DR. He
stated that the President chose to proceed this way and to
insist on the Assembly passing the law to strengthen ICE
prior to passing CAFTA-DR to win good will from members of
some of the many labor unions that have voiced opposition to
CAFTA-DR. The bill is supposed to give ICE the financial and
administrative autonomy necessary to compete in a gradually
opened telecommunication industry as required by CAFTA-DR.
Barrantes acknowledged that from a CAFTA-DR compliance point
of view, this proposed law was problematic since it exempts
ICE from having to pay any taxes and gives concessions for
use of most of the telecommunications spectrum. (Note: Annex
13 to Chapter 13 of CAFTA-DR basically requires a strong
regulator of the telecommunications market that ensures equal
treatment and access for all competitors be they publicly- or
privately-owned. End Note.)
¶7. (C) Barrantes said that the issues noted above would be
fixed in the Telecommunications Act that is currently under
review by the Administration and ICE, and that may be
submitted to the Assembly in as early as a few weeks or as
late as January 2006. Barrantes said that perhaps the GOCR
would wait until December or January to lessen the likelihood
that anti-CAFTA forces could marshal university and high
school student support for protests.
¶8. (C) Barrantes said that a significant issue under
discussion regarding the Telecommunications Act was how to
regulate the telecommunications spectrum. He referred to a
World Bank study that is not publicly available that, he
stated, confirms there is enough available telecommunications
spectrum to allow sufficient competition, i.e., it would not
be necessary to take any spectrum away that ICE currently has
the rights to use. At the same time, he also said that the
Telecommunications Act would "clean up" the spectrum.
Barrantes said that President Pacheco personally intervened
over the objections of some ministers and to make the
decision not to address spectrum issues in the proposed law
to strengthen ICE. Barrantes said Pacheco wants to avoid
confrontation with the labor unions at this time by not
appearing to take anything away from ICE in that bill.
¶9. (C) Barrantes stated that the proposed bill to
strengthen ICE would be sent for review by a special
deputies-only committee which would consist of three PUSC
deputies, three deputies from the opposition National
Liberation Party (PLN) and probably one to three deputies
from other parties. He said most of the deputies that will
be on this committee will have served on the now-defunct
special mixed committee to review ICE that reviewed the
previously proposed law to strengthen ICE.
¶10. (C) Barrantes also said that a new and independent
regulatory body would be formed and would be named the
Superintendent of Telecommunications. He admitted that the
Regulatory Authority of Public Services (ARASEP), which had
been rumored to be the responsible regulatory agency, is not
qualified to do the job. Barrantes recognized the difficult
task of building such an organization from the ground up
including finding properly trained and experienced personnel
and generating regulations and defining procedures for an
open telecommunications market. He did say that the
Administration was working with several international
consultants on these issues.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶11. (C) Barrantes,s comments served to underline the
significant barriers to rapid movement toward CAFTA-DR
ratification that remain, and which complicate passage in
¶2006. President Pacheco's insistence that the Assembly pass
the newly introduced law to strengthen ICE which contains
articles, which go against CAFTA-DR commitments, further
muddies the waters. Moreover, Barrantes,s comments about
the possibility of not "freeing up" telecommunications
frequencies highlights a key potential CAFTA-DR compliance
issue. In short, for the GOCR negotiating the agreement may
well have been the easy part, ratifying CAFTA-DR more
difficult, and passing the necessary legislation to comply
with its commitments could well constitute the biggest
challenge.
LANGDALE