

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09QUITO973, GOE "EXPLAINS" TERMINATION OF INVESTMENT TREATIES...
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09QUITO973.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09QUITO973 | 2009-11-17 22:43 | 2011-04-29 17:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Quito |
Appears in these articles: http://www.eluniverso.com/2011/04/26/1/1355/cable-235229.html |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHQT #0973/01 3212243
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 172243Z NOV 09
FM AMEMBASSY QUITO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0347
INFO RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA
RUEHC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON DC
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA
RUEHQT/AMEMBASSY QUITO
C O N F I D E N T I A L QUITO 000973
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA/AND, WHA/EPSC AND EEB/IFD/OIA
DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR BENNETT HARMAN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 2019/11/17
TAGS: EINV ECON EC
SUBJECT: GOE "EXPLAINS" TERMINATION OF INVESTMENT TREATIES...
id: 235229
date: 11/17/2009 22:43
refid: 09QUITO973
origin: Embassy Quito
classification: CONFIDENTIAL
destination: 09QUITO905|09QUITO938|09QUITO949
header:
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHQT #0973/01 3212243
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 172243Z NOV 09
FM AMEMBASSY QUITO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0347
INFO RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA
RUEHC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON DC
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA
RUEHQT/AMEMBASSY QUITO
----------------- header ends ----------------
C O N F I D E N T I A L QUITO 000973
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA/AND, WHA/EPSC AND EEB/IFD/OIA
DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR BENNETT HARMAN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 2019/11/17
TAGS: EINV ECON EC
SUBJECT: GOE "EXPLAINS" TERMINATION OF INVESTMENT TREATIES
REF: 09 QUITO 905; 09 QUITO 949; 09 QUITO 938
CLASSIFIED BY: Andrew Chritton, Charge, State, Exec; REASON: 1.4(B),
(D)
Summary
¶1. (SBU) Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Falconi explained the
reasoning behind the GoE's decision to terminate 13 bilateral
investment treaties (BITs) during a November 12 meeting with
Embassy representatives of the affected countries. Falconi
reiterated the GoE's claim that Ecuador's 2008 Constitution was
forcing the government's hand, but said the GoE was preparing a
model to use for negotiation of new investment agreements, which it
expected to commence in January. The GoE's new model would limit
settlement of State-Investor disputes to regional, rather than
international, arbitration, and eliminate provisions providing
"national treatment" for foreign investors. Although the National
Assembly has not yet responded to the GoE's request to approve
termination of the BITs, we expect the GoE will eventually receive
this approval and submit formal notification to terminate the
U.S.-Ecuador BIT. End Summary.
Background
¶2. (SBU) On September 29, 2009, President Correa sent a letter to
the National Assembly requesting approval to terminate thirteen of
the country's bilateral investment treaties (BITs). The affected
treaties were with: Argentina, Canada, Chile, China, Finland,
France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, the United
Kingdom (includes Ireland), the United States, and Venezuela. The
GoE did not request approval to terminate BITS with Spain, Italy,
Peru and Bolivia. The National Assembly has not yet responded to
the President's request. (See Ref A for Post's initial reporting
on this decision and Ref B for National Assembly President
Cordero's comments on this process.)
MFA Scrambling to Minimize Diplomatic Fallout
¶3. (SBU) On November 12, Minister of Foreign Affairs Falconi
convened a meeting of ambassadors and representatives from those
Missions with BITs that the GoE plans to terminate. Falconi opened
the meeting by apologizing to those Ambassadors whom the MFA had
been unable to meet with individually, but said the public
attention the issue was receiving had prompted the MFA instead to
call quickly a joint meeting. He said he wanted to explain in
person the legal and policy reasons for the government's action,
the transition process, and to assure the affected Missions that
foreign investment is not unprotected in Ecuador.
¶4. (SBU) Reinforcing what had been conveyed to the Ambassador on
October 26 by then Acting Foreign Minister Pozo (refA), Falconi
reiterated that the GoE was obligated under Ecuador's 2008
Constitution to terminate any treaty that would submit the
Ecuadorian state to international arbitration in a dispute with a
private investor. He asserted that there was no other option.
Falconi also noted that constitutional provisions, and GoE policy,
require that foreign direct investment be in alignment with
Ecuador's National Development Plan.
¶5. (SBU) Falconi took pains to emphasize that foreign investment
was protected in Ecuador, not only through bilateral investment
treaties, but by Ecuador's Constitution and legal framework. Under
the Constitution, legal security -- even for investment -- was
considered a human right and arbitration was recognized as a valid
mechanism for dispute resolution, as long as it was conducted in a
national or regional forum. He asserted that Ecuador was
supportive of foreign investment, but that the country was now
applying an alternative model in which it was seeking social
justice. Falconi claimed that under the new model, Ecuador had
already received important foreign investments from China
(hydro-electrical project financed by China, ref C) and Venezuela.
Assembly Approval Expected
¶6. (C) On the process and timing of BIT termination, Falconi said
the National Assembly would make a pronouncement within 15 days on
President Correa's request for approval to terminate the BITs. He
appeared confident that the Assembly's approval would be
forthcoming. (Note: National Assembly President Cordero expressed
some misgivings about terminating the BITs in a November 6 meeting
with the Ambassador (ref B). End note.) An inter-ministerial
group is developing a new model investment agreement which they
hope to complete soon. Through its new investment model, Falconi
said the GoE seeks to balance the interests of the investor and the
regulatory role of the State. He emphasized that the GoE wants to
promote investment, but that private foreign investment was viewed
as "complementary" to State investment (Constitution Art. 339).
Decision - Part of Longtime Policy Review
¶7. (SBU) In order to provide context for the GoE's actions,
Falconi outlined events leading up to Correa's letter to the
Assembly. Falconi said review of the country's investment policies
began before the Correa Administration, noting the work of a COMEXI
advisory council in 2004 to analyze the commercial and policy
impacts of the country's existing BITs. In 2007, a report found
little correlation between the existence of a BIT and decisions
made by investors. Accordng to Falconi, the report concluded that
issues such as taxation, market size, labor laws, political
stability and legal security were instead the major determinants of
investment decisions.
¶8. (SBU) Falconi noted that in 2008 the GoE terminated without
fanfare nine BITs, which they had determined had not produced
significant investment flows. Later that year, the GoE decided to
suspend negotiation of new BITs until a policy was better defined.
In October 2008, Ecuador's new Constitution was approved. In
February 2009, Ecuador's Foreign Trade Council (COMEXI) issued
Resolution 474 which directed the MFA to renegotiate the country's
BITs, prompting President Correa's letter to the Assembly in
September. In July 2009, Ecuador withdrew from the World Bank
International Center for Settlement of Disputes (ICSID) with the
aim of maintaining Ecuador's sovereignty and achieving impartiality
in the settlement of disputes, according to Minister Falconi.
Falconi explained that BITs with Spain, Italy, Peru and Bolivia
were not being terminated because the terms of those treaties do
not allow termination at this time.
More Details from MFA Advisor
¶9. (SBU) Minister Falconi then turned the meeting over to MFA
legal advisor, Marco Abuja, and departed. Abuja claimed the
administration was working with urgency on its plan to renegotiate
all the investment treaties out of concern that the existing
treaties are vulnerable to a constitutional challenge that could
render them null and void. On this point, the EU representative
expressed concern that the Constitution, a document limited to
internal affairs, could be used to void an international treaty.
While noting respect for Ecuador's sovereignty, he opined that
provisions of the Constitution represent internal issues and should
not affect bilateral treaties.
¶10. (SBU) With regard to international arbitration, Abuja stated
that Article 422 of Ecuador's Constitution does not permit Ecuador
to enter into international agreements in which the State would be
subject to rulings by international dispute settlement bodies in
State-investor disputes. According to Abuja, the Constitution
requires that State-investor disputes only be heard before national
or regional dispute settlement bodies. Ecuador aims to develop a
new arbitration mechanism that guarantees equity and equal
conditions for all parties within UNASUR or ALBA. Abuja also
mentioned that the Organization of American States (OAS) is
considering the establishment of a dispute settlement body in
Central America or the Caribbean. Abuja noted that the
restriction regarding international arbitration did not apply in
cases of State-State disputes. After Abuja's presentation, the
Canadian ambassador commented that Canadian investors were very
concerned with the GoE's decision and pointed out that it would be
impossible to negotiate a new investment agreement calling for
regional arbitration when these regional dispute settlement bodies
do not yet even exist. The German ambassador challenged Abuja's
interpretation of Article 422 claiming that even regional
arbitration did not appear to extend to nationals that were not
citizens within Latin American. Abuja claimed that the GoE
interpretation of the article was that it applied to investors of
any nationality. (Note, the EU representative affirmed during the
meeting that any new investment agreement would be negotiated
between Ecuador and the EU, rather than with individual EU member
states.)
Timing
¶11. (SBU) Abuja said the MFA plans to terminate (provide written
notification of intent to terminate) the BITs in January 2010 and
then immediately start negotiations on the new investment
agreements. He also described the GoE's view of the relationship
between the new investment agreements it hopes to negotiate and the
existing BITs, which all have provisions that extend protection for
existing investments for a number of years beyond termination. He
described as a "transition period" the time from the GoE's
notification of termination of an existing BIT until a new
investment agreement was negotiated and in force. From the GoE's
perspective, the new investment agreement would replace the BIT,
rendering it and its international arbitration provisions void. In
other words, under the MFA's scenario, the existing BITs would not
be applied for the 10-15 years after termination stipulated in the
treaties, but only until a new agreement is concluded. The MFA
encouraged countries to quickly negotiate new investment agreements
in order to avoid a lapse in coverage for new investments.
Arbitration and National Treatment
¶12. (SBU) Abuja detailed the GoE's concerns with, and the
perceived weaknesses of, current international dispute resolution
mechanisms. From the GoE's perspective, international arbitration
permits legal challenges to Ecuador's public policies in fora
outside Ecuador's national jurisdiction, contrary to what is
permitted under Ecuador's 2008 Constitution. International
arbitration processes are not transparent and do not provide public
access to documents in the cases. Furthermore, ICSID rulings are
in violation of Ecuador's Constitution in the sense that they are
final, without any possibility of annulment by another authority.
Finally, ICSID does not consider Ecuador's Constitution as a
fundamental norm for its rulings. Abuja noted that most of
Ecuador's current BITs specifically identify ICSID as the relevant
dispute settlement body.
¶13. (SBU) Abuja said "national treatment" provisions would also
be eliminated in the new investment agreements envisioned by the
GoE. As justification, Abuja argued that the principle of
"national treatment" actually places local investors at a
disadvantage. He explained that international dispute resolution
bodies allow foreign investors to take their cases directly to
ICSID, while local investors must follow the administrative
procedures in local courts. Abuja also stated that the
administration wants to be able to give preference to local
investors in certain sectors.
New Arbitration Mechanisms
¶14. (SBU) Abuja outlined aspects of the new regional
arbitration bodies being considered by UNASUR, ALBA and the OAS,
such as: application of arbitration procedures only after all
administrative instances have been exhausted; minimal costs;
resolution period of 12 months maximum; public list of arbitrators;
and annulment possible by a superior authority. From the GoE's
perspective, in evaluating investment dispute claims, new concepts
should be considered, such as: standards related to the
pre-establishment of investment, environmental impact,
post-establishment of investment, and the defense of human rights;
the fulfillment of National Development Plan objectives; corporate
social responsibility; and anticorruption norms.
Comment
¶15. (C) Although the GoE may find it convenient to claim that
prior administrations were responsible for initiating the review
process that has led the government to seek termination of its
bilateral investment treaties, the Constitution, the primary
justification for termination of the BITs, is the undisputed child
of the Correa administration. The determinant provisions of the
Constitution reflect the ideology and priorities of this
government. Therefore, there is little internal impetus for the
GoE to seek alternative ways of dealing with the implications of
the new Constitution regarding foreign investment. There may be a
window of opportunity in which the USG and like-minded countries
can reason with the GoE regarding the negative repercussions that
are likely should they follow through with their plan. While
termination of the BITs is not yet a done deal, we suspect that in
the end the GoE will get approval from the National Assembly and
move forward with termination of the BITs, and its efforts to
negotiate new investment agreements. At that point, the USG will
have to decide whether it is preferable to maintain the existing
BIT through its termination phase plus ten years protection for
existing investment, or consider the GoE's offer to negotiate a new
agreement on their terms.
CHRITTON
=======================CABLE ENDS============================