

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08BRASILIA1590, THE BRAZIL-RUSSIA PARTNERSHIP: COFFEE AND SYMPATHY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08BRASILIA1590.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08BRASILIA1590 | 2008-12-12 15:52 | 2011-02-13 00:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Brasilia |
VZCZCXYZ0026
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHBR #1590/01 3471552
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 121552Z DEC 08
FM AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3083
INFO RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 4305
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 0384
RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO 6982
RUEHSO/AMCONSUL SAO PAULO 3197
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0285
C O N F I D E N T I A L BRASILIA 001590
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR WHA/BSC
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/10/2018
TAGS: PREL MASS ETRD EAGR ENGR BR RS
SUBJECT: THE BRAZIL-RUSSIA PARTNERSHIP: COFFEE AND SYMPATHY
REF: MOSCOW 3526
Classified By: DCM Lisa Kubiske. Reason 1.5(D)
¶1. (C) SUMMARY. The late November visit to Brazil by Russian President Medvedev provided an opportunity for both countries to express their interest in enhanced economic ties, science and defense cooperation, energy and development of the BRIC grouping as a more regular international forum. Brazil and Russia used Medvedev,s visit and the meeting of the Intergovernmental Commission on Economic Cooperation that preceded it as a means of evaluating their current relationship and exploring areas of potential for increased partnership. Working with Russia, another large country with an expanding economy, is politically attractive to Brazil, which aspires to the sort of regional leadership (and permanent UNSC seat) that Russia has. Russia also provides a growing market for Brazilian exports, including meat and coffee, as well as a source of technology for Brazilian industry. Although Medvedev,s visit highlighted these areas of potential, Russian-Brazil cooperation remains more theoretical than actual. Brazilians cite the difficulty of doing business with Russia, diverging interests in such areas as alternative fuels and Russia,s backing of Hugo Chavez as obstacles to progress. The Medvedev visit was widely seen by Brazilians as successful in terms of the number of declarations in principle that cooperation would be pursued, rather than because of any concrete results. While Brazil,s decision to purchase twelve Russian helicopters was heralded as indicative of a new strategic partnership, Brazilian officials have privately referred to the purchase as a &token.8 Although the declaration of the Presidents made much of areas for future collaboration, it was notably silent on the current financial crisis, a key omission in light of the importance of oil prices to Russia,s economy, the effects already being experienced by Brazil's export sector, and the role both aspire to play in resolving the crisis. The relationship with Russia will continue to be politically important to Brazil, but partnership will continue to feature more joint declarations than concrete projects. END SUMMARY.
¶2. (C) During a recent discussion at the Ministry for External Relations (MRE), the Director for Europe, Elizabeth Mazzella, described Brazilian feelings toward Russia as &sympathy.8 Brazilians believe that they and Russia have much in common. Both are large, multi-ethnic states with growing economies. In 2002, the two governments launched a &strategic partnership8 that was reaffirmed during President Medvedev,s November 2008 visit to Brazil. While the visit yielded some substantive results, notably Brazil,s decision to purchase combat helicopters, most of what emerged was in the nature of resolutions to explore future cooperation in such diverse areas as energy, the environment, coffee exports and UN reform. Much like the coffee to be exported, such broad declarations, though lacking substance, are much to the Brazilian taste and illustrate Brazil,s political interest in enhancing its sympathetic relationship.
POTENTIAL FOR TRADE ---------------------------------
¶3. (C) When asked about results from the Lula-Medvedev Summit, Brazilian officials cite commercial cooperation as of greatest importance, however, the actual outcomes of the meeting indicate that at present the potential for cooperation greatly exceeds the reality. In 2007, bilateral trade was worth approximately $5 billion, and the Presidents called for its expansion and diversification. For Brazil, the priority will be on exports from its agricultural sector, especially meat products. Russia has restricted Brazil exports, particularly of pork and chicken, based on supposed concerns about food safety but has shown signs of relaxing its restrictions. A Russian food inspection team recently visited Sao Paulo and Brazilian meat packagers have signed agreements to operate two plants in Kaliningrad. The MRE also reports new agreements for the sale of Brazilian trucks and coffee (&In Moscow, they drink too much tea.8) to Russia. The Presidents also agreed to work on an agreement to avoid &double taxation8 to promote business cooperation.
¶4. (SBU) Lula and Medvedev emphasized the energy sector as having "significant potential for cooperation." Gazprom and Lukoil have sent teams to Brazil to try to get a piece of Brazil,s offshore oil action by offering alleged Russian expertise from joint projects with the U.S. to help surmount technical obstacles to exploitation of Brazil,s pre-salt oil reserves. Rosatom has approach the Brazilian Ministry of Energy about Brazil,s plan to build up to eight new nuclear power plants, but the MRE believes Russia to be an unlikely partner because of its unwillingness to transfer technology and its insistence on providing the fuel for Russian built plants. Brazil would prefer to make use of its own uranium reserves and enrichment capabilities. MRE special advisor Marcos Pinta Gama told poloff that Russia had offered assistance with Brazil,s plans to build a nuclear powered submarine, but Defense Minister Jobim considered France a better partner. Brazil was unable to interest the Russians in biofuels and believes Russia,s energy sector will remain centered on oil.
¶5. (C) Russia agreed in principle to assist Brazil,s development of its Satellite Launch Vehicle as a &partner8 for next generation space launch development. In return, the Brazilians expressed interest in partnership in Russia,s satellite navigations system. MRE sources told us that the Intergovernmental Commission had discussed possible Russian use of Brazil,s future satellite launch facility, but that the Russian side had little understanding of the difficulties Brazil faced in building on the proposed site. When told that the land belonged to a group of quilombos (descendents of escaped slaves), the Russian rep had said, &What is the problem? Just pack them up and move them somewhere else.8
DEFENSE COOPERATION -----------------------------------
¶6. (C) Brazil regards Russia as an important potential collaborator in the areas of defense and security, but, as in other areas, &potential8 remains the key concept. Brazil and Russia were able to sign a defense cooperation agreement similar to the one with the U.S. that the MRE has refused to clear on for almost a year. The two governments have also agreed in principle on an information sharing agreement whose negotiation was in the words of a MRE source &surprisingly easy.8
¶7. (C) In Brazilian reporting on the Summit, the headline result was Brazil,s agreement to purchase twelve Mi-35 attack helicopters for &defense of the Amazon.8 While the efficacy of a dozen relatively short range aircraft for such a job is open to debate, the purchase appears to be no more than a political sop to the Russians. Officially, the decision to buy from Russia is portrayed as bringing the benefit of &diversified8 sources of military equipment, but MRE Europe Director Mazzella referred to it as a &token.8 Brazilian military sources have told the Defense Attache Office that the only reason for buying some Russian equipment would be to demonstrate its poor quality in order to have a strong case for not buying more.
THE FELLOW &BRIC8 ROAD --------------------------------------
¶8. (C) One other major result of the Medvedev-Lula meeting from Brazil,s point of view was Russia,s agreement to host a major Summit of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) countries in Yekaterinburg in May or June of next year. At this time, the MRE has no specifics regarding the agenda but regards the meeting as an important step in the development of the BRIC group as a regular international grouping. According to Mazzella, the Russians share Brazil,s interest in enhancing the BRIC group and have been most active in promoting greater group unity. This was reflected in the statement released by the BRIC Ministerial in May 2008 which largely reflected Russian international priorities. Mazzella admitted that the statement was a Russian draft but noted that Brazil contributed the language calling for reform of the UN Security Council. India and China, although they attend the meetings, have not taken as great a role and have shown less interest in going down the road of expanding joint BRIC activity.
UN REFORM -----------------
¶9. (SBU) The Brazilian press showed some disappointment with what was seen as a lack of agreement with Russia on the importance of UN reform -- a term in Brazil understood to mean only inclusion of Brazil as a permanent member of the Security Council. The MRE takes a &glass half full8 view of the Summit, noting that Russia did agree that the UNSC should be enlarged and progress should be rapid. This language is viewed by the GOB as a step forward from the Russians, who have been seen as among the least sympathetic toward Brazil,s aspirations. As one Brazilian diplomat who has served in Moscow put it: &Russia has lots of land and a falling population. Their Security Council seat is what keeps them important.8
STRATEGIC PARTNERS -- OR NOT --------------------------------------------- --
¶10. (C) For many Brazilian leaders, a strategic partnership with Russia makes sense. As are many Russians, Brazilians are fond of rhetoric espousing &multipolarity,8 UN primacy and territorial integrity. Minister for Strategic Planning Roberto Mangabeira Unger has stated repeatedly that Russia is a natural partner and has championed enhancing defense cooperation as a means of lessening presumed dependence on the U.S. Despite the political attraction, the strategic partnership has, much like initiatives to enhance trade, been more in terms of potential than concrete projects.
¶11. (C) From the Brazilian point of view, there are several reasons for caution in the partnership with Russia. The Brazilian military has told Defense Attaches that they believe Russian equipment to be inferior and prone to maintenance problems. The Sukhoi 35 was dropped from the FX2 fighter competition in October because Russia was unwilling to transfer technology. Furthermore, Brazilian Air Force members who participated in discussions with Russia considered their counterparts to be &uninterested in reaching a mutually advantageous deal8 but focused on &winning8 the negotiations. There is also little common ground with Russia on such key issues for Brazil as biofuels and environmental initiatives. Also, Brazilians are wary about what they view as excessive Russian arms sales to Venezuela. With the Chavez government known to be supplying weapons to the FARC, Pinta Gama expressed concern that Chavez is buying more rifles than there are members of the Venezuelan military. Concerned about the lack of control over their extensive borders, many Brazilians regard Russia,s pretext of protecting citizens with recently issued passports as justification for invading Georgia as an unwelcome precedent.
¶12. (C) Comment: Despite the difficulties, the Brazil-Russia relationship offers attractions for both sides. In some ways, Russia is much of what Brazil aspires to be: a major power with a UNSC seat that is the heavyweight among its region,s economies. In Brazil, Russia has a sympathetic government with strong democratic credentials in Latin America that tends to avoid criticism of Russia,s human rights record and heavy handed policies toward its neighbors. The Medvedev visit afforded an opportunity to reaffirm the partnership and announce intentions to pursue cooperation in commerce, defense, energy and science. These announcements serve their political purpose of signaling the importance each country attaches to the relationship but do not necessarily carry much promise of follow through. Lost in the impressive rhetoric on increasing trade and scientific cooperation is the reality of the global financial crisis and its likely affects on both countries and their ability to undertake major new cooperative projects. Brazil and Russia will continue to have sympathy for each other in areas where it is politically advantageous, but substantial cooperation will probably remain on a slower track.
SOBEL