

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08WELLINGTON310, NZ DEFENSE REPORT REVEALS SHORTCOMINGS, CREATES DEBATE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08WELLINGTON310.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08WELLINGTON310 | 2008-09-19 07:22 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO6501
RR RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0310/01 2630722
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 190722Z SEP 08
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5439
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1744
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5264
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0722
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
RUEHPB/AMEMBASSY PORT MORESBY 0758
RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL 0064
RUEHDT/AMEMBASSY DILI 0034
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000310
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV MARR EFIN NZ
SUBJECT: NZ DEFENSE REPORT REVEALS SHORTCOMINGS, CREATES DEBATE
WELLINGTON 00000310 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) Summary. The publication of the 2008 New Zealand Defense
Force (NZDF) Annual Report created recent media controversy as it
revealed shortfalls in the country's military preparedness. The NZ
Defense Chief and Defense Minister defended the status of the NZ
military. A subsequent report reinforced concerns that the NZDF faced
serious manpower, procurement and capacity challenges. The opposition
National Party tried (without success) to gain political advantage out
of the reports but defense issues do not factor into the November 8
election for the majority of the general public. End Summary.
New Zealand Defense Force Release Status Report
--------------------------------------------- --
¶2. (SBU) The GNZ released the 2008 New Zealand Defense Force (NZDF)
Annual Report on September 3, which quickly prompted questions about
the state of the country's military preparedness. The New Zealand
Ministry of Defense-generated report revealed that the NZDF is
currently ill-prepared to perform any mission beyond a low-level
confrontation and faces numerous personnel, equipment and capacity
challenges across the services. One major newspaper used broadsheet
style banner headlines to sum up the NZDF's state of readiness: "Can't
Sail, Can't Fly, Can't Fight."
Problems Facing All Services
----------------------------
¶3. (U) According to the report, all three services of the NZDF - Army,
Navy and Air Force - are facing challenges. For the Army, the report
stated that land forces were only "partially" prepared for low-level
conflicts, and it was not equipped to meet higher threats. The report
further stated that "deficiencies in command and control, firepower,
and compatible protection and mobility for combat service support
elements would impair effectiveness in conventional military
operations, and the more challenging peace support operations."
¶4. (U) The Air Force was reported as having "insufficient personnel" to
meet air and ground crew levels and being only "partially prepared" for
complex maritime air operations. It was also revealed that essential
air transport and helicopter assets were restricted by technical
problems or crew shortages. The report stated that few of the Navy's
ships managed to get to sea as much as planned due to both a lack of
personnel and "equipment and capability issues." The Navy also did not
receive two offshore patrol vessels and four inshore patrol vessels
during the year in question, when these had been expected.
¶5. (U) The report stated that NZ's Special Operations Forces are
"maintained at a high state of readiness in order to meet short notice
special operations in support of land combat operations,
counter-terrorist operations, and the disposal of improvised explosive
devices." However, it conceded that their ability to contribute beyond
current operations is "very limited."
Another Negative Report follows Annual Report
---------------------------------------------
¶6. (SBU) A subsequent report only served to buttress the perception
that the NZDF has considerable equipment and staffing issues. The
Ministry of Defense and the NZDF commissioned John Coles, formally
Chief Executive of the UK Ministry of Defense's Warship Support Agency,
to independently review the acquisition and introduction into service
of the HMNZS Canterbury, the New Zealand Navy's recently acquired yet
troubled multi-role ship. The subsequent Coles Report revealed that an
extra NZD 20 million funding is needed to address vessel safety issues
and make it seaworthy. The report found no fault with Ministry of
Defense procurement officials for purchasing a NZD 177 million ship
vessel. Nonetheless, the Ministry's former Acquisition Chief Bruce
Green, who was involved in the original procurement of the vessel,
criticized the Canterbury's crew whose inexperience with multi-role
ship, he argued, directly led to the subsequent damage to the ship in
heavy seas. The report identified a number of material and training
shortcomings, but judged that there is no correlation between the death
of a crew member on October 5 2007 - during a maneuver at sea to deploy
a rigid hull inflatable boat - and the intrinsic safety of vessel.
Defense Chief says Standards not Compromised
--------------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) In the 2008 Annual Report, Defense Force Chief Lieutenant
General Jerry Mataparae acknowledged the high staff attrition rate -
more than 15 per cent - and the loss of trained staff to the civilian
sector. However, he noted that the New Zealand Military maintains high
WELLINGTON 00000310 002.2 OF 003
standards at home and abroad despite the struggle to retain staff.
Mataparae said in the report that new equipment and new employment
strategies would help with the problems.
Defense Minister Endorse State of NZ Military
---------------------------------------------
¶8. (SBU) Defense Minister Phil Goff defended the state of the NZDF and
expressed confidence in its ability to carry out its mission. Goff
noted that armed forces worldwide face a challenge to attract and
retain staff and yet New Zealand's total number of defense force
personnel was at its highest level in seven years. He said that
despite the challenges currently facing the armed forces the reputation
of the NZDF remains high and noted that the company operating in Bamian
province is regarded as the "the best PRT in Afghanistan." Goff
asserted that any claim that the NZDF is not fit for combat on the
basis on the 2008 Annual report is without foundation.
Labour-led Government Committed to Building up NZDF
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶9. (SBU) When Helen Clark's Labour Party defeated the then National
Government in 1999, the NZDF was largely under-funded and beset by
chronic staff loss and obsolete equipment. The incoming Labour-led
government committed itself to build and maintain a modern, well
trained, well equipped defense force. Goff argued that 2008 Annual
Report was a progress report on rebuilding and modernising the NZDF
from a similar 1999 status report which underscored the sorry state of
the defense force at the time. Goff stressed that since 1999,
successive Labour-led governments have sought to redress the funding -
NZD 8 billion to date - and staffing shortfall in a ten-year plan that
has not yet run its course. Since 2002, Goff asserted, the Government
has injected NZD 4 billion to replace outdated equipment in all three
arms of the NZDF, making it "the best equipped it had ever been."
¶10. (SBU) In the 2008 Budget of May 23, the Government allocated NZD
276.4 million over the next four years to grow and retain existing
defense service personnel in a tight New Zealand labor market. This
funding is out of the NZD 4.6 billion Defense Sustainability initiative
started by the government in 2005. This represents approximately 1.4%
of GDP, which is not dissimilar to the 1999 level of 1.3% (Note:
Defense spending in NZ peaked at about 3% of GDP in the 1950s, and
declined to an average of around 1.7% over the next three decades
before falling sharply to around 1% of GDP during the 1990s. End
Note). Goff has stated that the current levels of defense spending
reflect the reality that "no-one is remotely interested in invading New
Zealand".
Opposition Criticizes Government over Findings
--------------------------------------------- -
¶11. (U) The findings of the 2008 report were immediately pounced upon
by the opposition National Party. Led by its defense spokesman, Dr.
Wayne Mapp, National highlighted the NZDF's "appalling state of
affairs" under Labour and condemned Goff's assertion the NZDF is "the
best-equipped it's ever been." Mapp stated that a National-led
government would immediately commission a Defense White Paper to
address the problems facing the NZDF. The National Party's attempt to
garner media attention over this issue largely failed, as defense
issues do not factor into the list of voter concerns for the November
elections.
Experts say Funding and Career Development Main Problems
--------------------------------------------- -----------
¶12. (SBU) Two of New Zealand's leading defense experts believe that
until the NZDF receive adequate funding and address career development,
problems will remain for the country's defense force. Air Vice
Marshall Robin Klitscher (ret.) welcomed the Government's plan to
re-equip the defense force, but questioned whether it would be enough
to restore troops' combat readiness to a reasonable level. Klitscher
also said New Zealand's defense policies leaned too heavily on its
allies to protect NZ troops when deployed. Former NZ Secretary of
Defense, and former NZ Ambassador to the US, Denis McLean said the
retention problem stemmed from New Zealand's defense strategy. McLean
argued that many NZ servicemen and women do not see a career in the
armed forces to be as attractive as in other countries because the NZ
military is under-resourced and operationally limited.
Comment
-------
WELLINGTON 00000310 003.2 OF 003
¶13. (SBU) The problems outlined in both the NZDF and Cole reports
mirror what many MOD officials have pointed out over the past several
years. New Zealand's military is funded and organized to be a largely
peace time military with limited capability geared towards the
occasional security problem in the Pacific. It is inadequate for
multiple, multi-year deployments such as those New Zealand is committed
to in Timor-Leste, the Solomon Islands and Afghanistan -- where some
troops have undergone multiple deployments to the same location. This
has led to the retention problem at the mid-ranks, which is most
worrisome to MOD leadership, primarily because security issues in the
Pacific and New Zealand's commitments to the UN are unlikely to
diminish. Until the NZ political leadership is willing to pay for a
NZDF that can handle multiple deployments over the medium to long term,
the NZDF will continue to work under stress.