

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08SANJOSE827, SECRETARY GUTIERREZ'S MEETINGS WITH PRESIDENT ARIAS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08SANJOSE827.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08SANJOSE827 | 2008-10-17 20:33 | 2011-03-02 16:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
Appears in these articles: http://www.nacion.com/2011-03-02/Investigacion.aspx |
VZCZCXYZ0013
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0827/01 2912033
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 172033Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0194
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHDG/AMEMBASSY SANTO DOMINGO PRIORITY 1606
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000827
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
COMMERCE FOR ITA, TDA AND SECRETARY'S OFFICE
DEPT FOR WHA, WHA/CEN, WHA/EPSC AND EEB
PLEASE PASS TP USTR AMALITO AND DOLIVER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD OVIP PGOV PINR PREL CS
SUBJECT: SECRETARY GUTIERREZ'S MEETINGS WITH PRESIDENT ARIAS
REFS: A) San Jose 745 (NOTAL), B) San Jose 774, C) San Jose 823
(NOTAL)
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: In two meetings held in the presidential office
complex on September 30, President Oscar Arias and Commerce
Secretary Carlos Gutierrez, joined by senior staff, discussed a wide
range of political and trade issues centered on Costa Rican entry
into CAFTA. Arias emphasized the political cost he had paid to move
Costa Rica almost to CAFTA implementation and asked for USG
understanding and flexibility as the GOCR neared entry-into-force.
Arias and his ministers asked that USTR accept a proposal permitting
them to enter CAFTA as soon as the 13th bill (on IPR catch-all
issues) was modified and approved, with a pledge to complete all
other issues, including a 14th technical corrections bill, if
needed, after entry-into-force (EIF). Secretary Gutierrez made
clear that any decision on a CAFTA proposal was USTR's, not his, but
he said he would make it a priority to discuss the proposal with
USTR when he returned to Washington. The Secretary also briefed
Arias on Bolivian and Cuban developments, while members of the
Secretary's party briefed on new and continuing OPIC, Ex-Im and U.S.
Trade and Development Agency initiatives. Minister of Foreign Trade
Ruiz suggested a CAFTA-related meeting on the margins of the next
Americas Competitiveness Forum, to presage the much-delayed CAFTA
Ministerial and to highlight the benefits of CAFTA and free trade in
contrast to the populist alternatives being offered around Latin
America. President Arias also reiterated his well-known pitch for
merit-based foreign assistance. Secretary Gutierrez's staff cleared
this report. Other visit events will be reported septel. END
SUMMARY.
-------------------------------
SMALLER MEETING: CAFTA SIDE LETTER, CUBA AND BOLIVIA
-------------------------------
¶2. (U) The events opened with a small meeting in the President's
office involving President Arias, Secretary Gutierrez, and senior
GOCR officials. With Arias were FM Bruno Stagno, Minister of
Foreign Trade Marco Vinicio Ruiz, National Legislature President
Francisco Pacheco and Ambassador Tomas Duenas from Washington. With
the Secretary were Ambassador Cianchette and DCM Brennan.
¶3. (SBU) THE CAFTA SAGA: Arias was more animated than Post had
observed for some time, as he explained the long CAFTA saga in Costa
Rica, stressing the importance of the 2007 national referendum which
narrowly ratified the treaty, and the significance of CAFTA changing
Costa Rica's 60 year-old traditional, statist model. Recalling the
long, tough political battle over the referendum, and noting that
the anti-CAFTA forces had many factors in their favor, including the
unions, the universities, the church, "and very probably Venezuelan
money," Arias emphasized, "I exposed myself politically, and there
has been a political cost." If CAFTA doesn't go through, he warned,
it will be a victory for Venezuela's Chavez, (the leading opposition
party) PAC, and the extreme leftist forces that have been resurgent
throughout the region.
¶4. (SBU) PITCH FOR FLEXIBILITY: The President admitted that he and
"everyone else" had fully expected the last (13th) CAFTA
implementation bill (the "catch all" on IPR issues) to get through
the Constitutional Court easily; they were all surprised by the
Court's September 11 ruling (which rejected a portion of the bill as
unconstitutional, Refs A-B). Under the circumstances, Arias
therefore asked for understanding and flexibility on our part. "I
would like to ask that as soon as this law is corrected, we be
allowed to enter into CAFTA - sin condicionamientos (without
conditions)."
¶5. (SBU) LEGISLATION VS THE GOCR PROPOSAL: When Secretary
Gutierrez asked about USTR's expectations, Ruiz responded that USTR
wanted some "small word changes" in IPR language that would require
new legislation. The GOCR had originally thought that these could
be fixed through regulations, but now realized that they could not.
Pacheco then chimed in, confirming that some of the changes (not
specified) "demanded" by USTR would require legislative approval,
and complaining that these seemed to be relatively minor and
inconsequential given all that had been accomplished to this point.
It would be a shame, he added, to have all of CAFTA bogged down and
perhaps jeopardized over such seemingly small matters.
¶6. (SBU) Minister Ruiz then asserted that the GOCR did not want the
tariff holdbacks that USTR seemed to be contemplating as a condition
if Costa Rica could not complete its CAFTA EIF requirements on time.
He and Arias said this would look very bad for everyone and would
be touted as a victory by the PAC-led opposition. Ruiz said they
preferred a side letter - which Arias said he would be willing to
sign - committing them to get the remaining items done, including
new legislation as needed, in the next legislative session (which
begins December 1). Ruiz re-emphasized that the GOCR did not want
any holdbacks. Returning to the historical context, Arias
reiterated that for Costa Rica, CAFTA was the culmination of a
"process of state reform that has taken more than 20 years - we
don't want to lose it now."
¶7. (SBU) Secretary Gutierrez made clear that any decision on a
CAFTA side letter was USTR's, not his, but he offered to take the
proposal back to Ambassador Schwab and see what could be done. He
said he could not provide any guarantees or promises on the
decision, but he would make it a priority to discuss with Schwab.
He said he would be back in his office on October 3, and planned to
discuss CAFTA then with Schwab, after which he would get in touch
with Ambassador Duenas at the Costa Rican Embassy.
¶8. (SBU) BOLIVIA AND CUBA: Secretary Gutierrez used the meeting to
raise two additional issues with President Arias: the non-renewal of
ATPDEA for Bolivia, and Cuba's refusal of humanitarian assistance
from the U.S. in the wake of Hurricanes Ike and Gustav. The
Secretary told Arias that he wanted the GOCR to understand the
background and context on both issues. On ATPDEA, the Secretary
described how the U.S. had been trying very hard to work with
President Morales and the GOB, but when they began shutting down USG
cooperation programs and then threw out our Ambassador, there was no
option.
¶9. (SBU) Regarding aid to Cuba, Secretary Gutierrez pointed out that
the U.S. had been doing everything it could as a humanitarian
gesture to help the Cuban people, but the GOC had repeatedly (four
times at that point) refused our assistance. Gutierrez added that
he simply wanted President Arias to know and understand the USG
position. He pointed out that while there's a great hue and cry
over the embargo, most countries don't know that the U.S. is the top
food and humanitarian assistance provider to Cuba, and the 2nd top
provider of medicines. Arias and FM Stagno acknowledged these
points, and thanked Gutierrez for the insights.
------------------------------
LARGER MEETING: HISTORY OF, NEED FOR, BENEFITS FROM CAFTA
------------------------------
¶10. (U) Moving to the Cabinet Room, Arias, the Secretary and the
participants in the first meeting were joined by a larger group
including, on the GOCR side, Minister of the Presidency Rodrigo
Arias (briefly) and Gabriela Llobet, Director of CINDE, the GOCR's
private, non-profit foreign direct investment development agency.
On the USG side, OPIC President and CEO Robert Mosbacher, Ex-Im Bank
1st VP and Vice-Chair Linda Conlin, Trade and Development Agency
Director Larry Walther, Commerce DAS Walter Bastian and Senior
Advisor Ambassador (ret.) Lino Gutierrez, and Embassy Pol-Econ
Counselor (notetaker) joined the session.
¶11. (U) MORE CAFTA CONTEXT: President Arias opened by elaborating
on the CAFTA and Costa Rican history he had described in the first
meeting. He stressed that Costa Rican and U.S. values were similar,
and that his country was "the most democratic" in Latin America,
according to a recent study by the Adenauer Foundation. Abolishing
the military in 1948 had allowed the GOCR to invest in education and
health care, fueling a higher level of social development than
elsewhere in the region. In addition, Costa Rica had opened trade,
the "motor" of economic development. Arias said he made the
"unilateral decision" during his first term as president (1986-1990)
to lower tariffs by 40%, open the Costa Rican economy, and begin to
better integrate with the world and the region, including by using
free trade agreements.
¶12. (SBU) None of the other Costa Rican FTAs had been as polemical
as CAFTA, however. Lacking the votes to ratify it in the
legislature, Arias said he took CAFTA to a referendum, winning by a
very close margin (less than 50,000 votes). Because CAFTA would
break up the long-popular state monopolies on telecommunications and
insurance, it took a long time for public support to build, and
Arias had to "gradually educate" the populace. Now, the GOCR was
"correcting the errors" found by the Constitutional Court in the
final CAFTA law, the 13th to be passed by the legislature in about a
year. Managing the five-party pro-CAFTA coalition to get this far
had been difficult, he stressed. The entire process had been an
"ordeal," and he and Secretary Gutierrez had been discussing how
best to bring the process to a close. The President concluded that
foreign investment remained important to Costa Rica, which was now
attracting more FDI per capita than Brazil or Mexico. Costa Rica's
tranquility, rule of law, democracy, and "absolutely independent"
judiciary made this possible.
¶13. (U) LONGSTANDING US-COSTA RICAN PARTNERSHIP: In response,
Secretary Gutierrez thanked President Arias for his and Costa Rica's
friendship to the United States, and offered greetings from POTUS.
He also commended Arias for his leadership on CAFTA. Despite the
remaining problems reaching implementation, Costa Rica would not
have been this far along without Arias's firm direction. The
Secretary noted the business delegation traveling with him to take
advantage of the opportunities to invest in Costa Rica, even as
CAFTA was being completed. "CAFTA without Costa Rica would not be
CAFTA," he stressed, and CAFTA membership had obvious benefits for
Costa Rica. The Secretary then opened the floor to other USDEL
members as follows:
-- OPIC's Mosbacher noted that his agency was not waiting for CAFTA
completion, but was announcing USD 105 million in new lending for
small- and medium-sized businesses and low- to moderate-income
homeowners in Costa Rica, partnering with Banco Lafise and BAC. He
added that OPIC had provided over USD 200 million in projects in
Costa Rica over the last two years, and over USD 370 million over
OPIC's history;
-- Ex-Im's Conlin noted that her organization "was no stranger" to
Costa Rica, having provided USD 46 million in a "broad spectrum" of
projects over the last six years. Ex-Im wants that positive
relationship to continue, she said, and agreed that finance could be
the catalyst for the "trade and commercial engine" of the Costa
Rican economy;
-- TDA's Walther described his agency's long-time partnership with
Costa Rica, in particular on infrastructure projects such as
electrical production and the early stages of expansion for San
Jose's Juan Santamaria International Airport; and
-- Lino Gutierrez thanked Arias and the GOCR for their constant
support for human rights issues around the globe, and especially on
Cuba, which was important to both Secretaries Gutierrez and Rice.
¶14. (SBU) Returning to the infrastructure theme, President Arias
noted that nearly two million tourists visited Costa Rica each year,
equivalent to half the nation's population, but the county's
airports, roads and ports were not able to handle the flow. The
GOCR hoped to concession the major Caribbean port of Limon, he said,
but it might take four more years to convince the powerful
dockworkers' union there. Arias expressed thanks for all the USG
and international support to projects and financing which aided
small and medium companies in Costa Rica. Many of these had the
"export mentality" that was essential to keep the economy growing.
----------------------------
A MEETING BEFORE THE FIRST CAFTA MINISTERIAL?
----------------------------
¶15. (SBU) Minister Ruiz used the session to suggest a bi-national
US-Costa Rica CAFTA commission meeting in the next few months,
including "observers" from the private sector and academia. "The
world is watching Central America and CAFTA," he asserted, and if
CAFTA should be "closed" to Costa Rica (by not entering into force),
he feared a significant loss in investment and trade. An
international vehicle was needed to highlight the benefits from
CAFTA and trade agreements. A bi-national entity would not have to
wait for the long-delayed first CAFTA Ministerial, he added, and
could underscore the "strategic partnership" between Costa Rica and
the United States while also countering the "alternative" political
and development model being offered by Venezuela, Nicaragua and
Bolivia. DAS Bastian noted that the Secretary and his delegation
had also been asked about the CAFTA Ministerial during their visit
to the Dominican Republic prior to visiting Costa Rica. A meeting
along the lines described by Ruiz, but expanded to include other
CAFTA partners, might be worth considering.
¶16. (SBU) PITCH FOR MERIT-BASED ASSISTANCE: President Arias
closed the session by returning to familiar arguments about Costa
Rica "deserving" additional international assistance. As a "middle
income" country, Costa Rica did not receive much USG assistance, he
asserted, although "70% of the world's poverty" was concentrated in
middle income nations. Although Arias had no objection to wealthier
nations helping the poorest countries, he was concerned by the aid
recipient nations who purchased weapons instead of focusing on
development needs such as education. "Never has Latin America seen
such a time of (inter-state) peace," he said, and yet nations like
Venezuela and Chile are buying arms. It is "schools and clinics"
that the developing world really needs, he said, and not arms. Thus
Arias underscored his continued campaign for merit-based as well as
needs-based foreign assistance.
CIANCHETTE