

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06WELLINGTON260, THE NUCLEAR BAN AND NEW ZEALAND'S IDENTITY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06WELLINGTON260.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06WELLINGTON260 | 2006-04-05 03:55 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXYZ0003
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHWL #0260/01 0950355
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 050355Z APR 06
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2611
INFO RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 4358
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHDC
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHJJAA/JICPAC HONOLULU HI
C O N F I D E N T I A L WELLINGTON 000260
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
NOFORN
STATE FOR D (FRITZ), EAP/FO, AND EAP/ANP
NSC FOR VICTOR CHA
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISA LIZ PHU
PACOM FOR JO1E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/29/2016
TAGS: PREL PGOV NZ
SUBJECT: THE NUCLEAR BAN AND NEW ZEALAND'S IDENTITY
Classified By: Political-Economic Counselor
Katherine Hadda, for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
¶1. (C) Summary: For reasons of history and politics, New
Zealand's anti-nuclear legislation has become a core part of
the nation's psyche. The ban arose just as the country was
forging its post-colonial identity, and has become as
integral to many Kiwis as the Constitution is to us.
Although we may never be able to convince New Zealanders to
lift the legislation, we can and should continue to address
the anti-Americanism that has become linked with the policy.
This includes encouraging new areas of bilateral cooperation
that will enable Kiwis to see the positive benefits of our
relationship. We should also not let the anti-nuclear issue
be used as an argument against a closer relationship with the
United States. End Summary.
¶2. (C) U.S. officials are often struck by the strong
attachment many New Zealanders hold for their country's
anti-nuclear legislation. Whenever we try to discuss the
issue's relevance to our current operations in the Pacific,
or question the logic of the policy in a post-Cold War world,
the response of most Kiwis is that we are bullying New
Zealand. What we see as a policy discussion appears to these
New Zealanders an attack on their core identity. But how
could legislation passed just 20 years ago be so intrinsic to
a nation's sense of self? There are four main reasons:
history, geography, the search for identity, and politics.
--------------------------------------------- ---------
A Brief History Lesson: The Search for a Post-Colonial
Identity
--------------------------------------------- ---------
¶3. (C) During the second world war, the United States
protected New Zealand, then a British dominion, from Japanese
invasion. By 1947, Britain had given New Zealand's
Parliament sole power to make laws for the country. With the
creation of the ANZUS defense alliance in 1951, both New
Zealand and Australia formally recognized for the first time
that their Cold War security depended primarily on the United
States, not Great Britain. Although even at that time an
anti-nuclear movement had begun here in response to U.S. and
others' nuclear testing in the Pacific, New Zealand remained
a strong ally of the United States and allowed U.S. naval
ship visits, including in later years those that were nuclear
armed or powered.
¶4. (C) Beginning in the late 1960s, many Kiwis became
uncomfortable with being U.S. allies. According to NZ
Historian Jock Phillips, while Americans took away
military/political lessons from the Vietnam War, New Zealand
came away with a new sense of national identity. Opposition
to the war was couched in nationalistic terms, because like
many Commonwealth countries at that time, New Zealanders were
carving out a post-colonial role. Because of the Vietnam war
and Britain's declining influence here, what arguably should
have been a rebellion against the UK was instead directed
against the United States.
¶5. (C) This desire to distance New Zealand from the United
States, and a growing hunger for a uniquely Kiwi identity,
were the backdrop against which the anti-nuclear movement
took center stage during the 1980s. By that time, American
testing in the Pacific had all but stopped, but French
testing in the region had created something akin to a mass
hysteria about all things nuclear in New Zealand. These and
other factors, including rising U.S.-Soviet tensions in the
early '80s, revived once more the anti-nuclear movement in
Australia and New Zealand. The demonstrators who opposed
U.S. warship visits to New Zealand at this time actually had
the environment on their mind more than the military.
National Party Prime Minister Robert Muldoon helped fan the
resentment by encouraging American ship visits, so that he
could point to the irresponsible nature of the demonstrators
and divert attention from the flailing post-oil shock
economy. The Labour Government that took power in 1984 and
initiated the anti-nuclea
r policy the following year also introduced radical economic
liberalization that induced real hardship for many Kiwis,
including core Labour supporters. Prime Minister Lange, too,
welcomed the diversion of anti-U.S. and anti-nuclear
sentiment from the problems of the day. Because of his own
political ideology he also had the secret agenda of wanting
to break New Zealand away from ANZUS, but was afraid the
average Kiwi voter would not accept this. Adopting the
pro-environment, moralistic stance of the anti-nuclear
movement gave him perfect cover to force a break in the
alliance.
¶6. (C) Many New Zealanders consider Lange's performance at a
1985 Oxford Union debate to be a defining moment in their
modern history. Lange, who argued the position "Nuclear
Weapons are Morally Indefensible," for the first time gave
New Zealanders a confident and witty Prime Minister lecturing
the world on a position unique to their country. Kiwis most
applaud Lange's remark that he could smell the uranium on the
breath of the opposing young American debater. The line was
devoid of substance but to Kiwis that's beside the point: the
debate's significance was not intellectual but emotional.
New Zealanders were taking a moral stand worthy of the
country's Scottish missionary forefathers. Kiwis told
themselves they were a force in the world. For many Kiwis,
the Chernobyl disaster the following year vindicated the
anti-nuclear policy and it became law in 1987.
---------------------------------------
Where I Stand Depends on Where I Sit...
---------------------------------------
¶7. (C) The second factor behind the nuclear ban's continued
draw is size and geography. New Zealand is as large as
California, but it's population is just four million. It's a
standing joke among Kiwis that everyone knows everyone else.
The country's newspapers resemble those in small town
America. Every major car accident is reported.
Everyone who has ever passed through New Zealand is a New
Zealander. (The press consider recently released Iraq
hostage Harmeet Sooden a New Zealander, even though his
passport -- and the rest of the world -- identify the
Auckland University student as Canadian.)
¶8. (C) New Zealand's small, geographically isolated
population also prides itself on its self-sufficiency and
ingenuity. They have an apocryphal ability to fix anything
with some number 8 wire, and visitors are often struck by how
much of the country's food is locally produced. Kiwis'
no-nonsense pioneer spirit -- possibly aided by indigenous
Maori and Pacific island culture -- has also led to an
admirable insistence on egalitarianism. But this has the
downside of at times encouraging the impractical and
discouraging innovation. The Prime Minister flies on
commercial or charter flights, even within the country. The
media waxes indignant over the parliamentary pension that New
Zealand's High Commissioner in London draws on top of his
"high" NZD 125,000 (USD 75,000) salary. The country's "tall
poppy syndrome" -- an overwhelming desire to cut high fliers
down to size -- is legendary.
¶9. (C) As with many small towners, New Zealanders long to be
noticed. They often have to clarify for themselves and
outsiders how they differ from their larger and more
ebullient neighbor Australia (think Canada and the United
States). They are also painfully aware that as many as 20
percent of their fellow countrymen (25 percent of those with
advanced degrees) have chosen to live abroad, often
permanently. There's a nagging insecurity among many Kiwis
that their country is inferior. As a result they vigorously
point to its uniqueness. Many things, from Busy Bee toys to
Holden cars, are classified as "iconic" Kiwiana. The
anti-nuclear legislation, seen as both unique and a way to
cut the mighty United States down to size, is the most iconic
of all. (Many of us suspect that if we were to openly
applaud the ban -- or at least say it no longer mattered to
U.S. policy -- the legislation would lose some of its appeal.)
¶10. (C) Despite their country's small size, geographic
isolation makes New Zealanders feel invulnerable. The
military regards itself as an expeditionary force, and the
official charged with international policy at the Ministry of
Defense almost laughed out loud when Polcouns once suggested
New Zealand might one day appreciate the option of U.S.
military assistance. The lack of a geographic threat also
enables Kiwis to view the world with a sense of detachment
and a bit of moral superiority. Many feel their small
country's interests are best served by multilateral rather
than bilateral arrangements. New Zealand's UN Perm Rep
Rosemary Banks has told us that because former PM Frazier
helped create the UN, many Kiwis have an unrealistic view of
the country's influence in that body. They also have a poor
understanding of how much the multilateral system depends on
the United States. It fits New Zealanders' sense of moral,
multilateral destiny to try to set an example for the rest of
the world through the ant
i-nuclear legislation.
------------------------------------------
The Continued Search for a Common Identity
------------------------------------------
¶11. (C) In the twenty years since the anti-nuclear
legislation was implemented, New Zealand has become a much
more heterogeneous society. In 1975 and again in 1987, the
country changed its race-based immigration policies. As of
the 2001 census some 30 percent of New Zealanders were Maori,
Pacific Islanders, Asian, African, or Middle Eastern. In
recent years, Maori have become more vocal about their
historic grievances and continued lag in key social
indicators such as income and health. The increased ethnic
mix and debate over the proper compensation for Maori have
raised a lot of questions here about what it means to be a
New Zealander.
¶12. (C) Recently, a guide showing EAP A/S Hill around the
national museum was asked whether the country sees Maori
culture as a common bond. He immediately answered that it
was the country's nuclear ban that made it unique. The
probable reason for that non sequitor is that in today's New
Zealand, people see both Maori culture and the anti-nuclear
policy as means of uniting Kiwis and differentiating the
country from others. The Labour government in particular has
used the search for a uniquely Kiwi identity -- including
being Maori, clean, green, and anti-nuclear -- to its
advantage. A junior Labour MP tells us Prime Minister Clark
sees this as part of her legacy.
--------
Politics
--------
¶13. (C) Some of the anti-nuclear legislation's creators,
including Prime Minister Clark and Defense Minister Goff, are
in Government today and remain personally attached to the
policy. Their sentimental attachment aside, the ban has also
proved useful for them politically. The Labour government
continues to cast itself as the guardian of the policy, and
the opposition National Party as closet U.S. poodles who
would immediately scrap the legislation if elected. There is
some evidence that such claims won Labour votes during the
last election campaign. But as we have previously reported,
National was never likely to be able to overturn the
legislation anyway because it is such a lightning rod issue.
Further, National is now close to declaring that it supports
maintaining the ban. In this way, the Nats hope to eliminate
it as a source of strength for Labour.
¶14. (C) The truth is that since 1994 no NZ Government of
either party has ever really had to pay a high price for
maintaining the anti-nuclear policy, whereas scrapping it
would cost a government dearly at the polls. There were no
U.S. bases in New Zealand at the time the anti-nuclear
legislation was passed, and so unlike Australia no potential
economic loss from a military split. Unlike France, which
successfully gained the release of the agents behind the
"Rainbow Warrior" bombing by threatening economic sanctions,
the United States has not been able to change New Zealand
policy through bans on high level political and military
contacts. In future reporting, we will explore further the
impact of these U.S. policies in New Zealand.
-------------------------
Where Do We Go From Here?
-------------------------
¶15. (C) The anti-nuclear legislation is not going anywhere
soon, as most New Zealanders have a strong identification
with the policy and there is no political leadership calling
for a change. New Zealand's future energy shortages may force
an eventual rethink on the nuclear ban, but for now most
analysts see this as unlikely given the options of solar,
wind, and other technologies that are more in keeping with
New Zealanders' "clean and green" self image.
¶16. (C) Nor would a decision to explore the use of nuclear
energy necessarily mean New Zealand would allow U.S. naval
ship visits, even on paper. The ban -- and U.S. reaction to
it -- has been used by its masters to become a surrogate for
New Zealand nationalism (and, by extension, anti-American
sentiment). Even if Kiwi officials were to decide it would
be in their interest to change the policy, they'd have a hard
time doing so.
¶17. (C) But although the ban is tough to address directly,
the underlying anti-Americanism does not have to be. We have
found that by shifting the conversation from the ban to New
Zealand's overall security interests, we have encouraged New
Zealanders to take a broader look at US-New Zealand
cooperation in the region and around the globe. Media
coverage of New Zealand's participation in the Proliferation
Security Initiative has been quite breathless, for example.
While previously this was due to misreporting that the U.S.
had changed its policy limiting joint exercises, there now
seems to be genuine interest in New Zealand's contribution to
this US-led multilateral effort. We can and should continue
to look for more such ways to encourage our Kiwi counterparts
to cooperate with us on issues of bilateral and regional
interest. We should also act -- within our broader interests
-- to keep the anti-nuclear issue from being used against
those of all political stripes who want a closer relationship
with the Un
ited States.
McCormick