

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07WELLINGTON653, ASIA DEMOCRACY PARTNERSHIP PITCHED TO NEW ZEALAND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07WELLINGTON653.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07WELLINGTON653 | 2007-08-30 19:47 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO4857
PP RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0653/01 2421947
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 301947Z AUG 07
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4657
INFO RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 4944
RUEHJA/AMEMBASSY JAKARTA 0070
RUEHML/AMEMBASSY MANILA 0546
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 0139
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0295
RUEHPB/AMEMBASSY PORT MORESBY 0677
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 0263
RUEHSV/AMEMBASSY SUVA 0627
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 0648
RUEHBN/AMCONSUL MELBOURNE 0114
RUEHBAD/AMCONSUL PERTH 0027
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0573
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000653
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
NSC FOR WILL INBODEN; G FOR PAUL LETTOW; EAP FOR RSP
E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/30/2017
TAGS: PGOV PHUM NZ KDEM
SUBJECT: ASIA DEMOCRACY PARTNERSHIP PITCHED TO NEW ZEALAND
REF: STATE 56424
Classified By: Poloff Gary Rex, for reasons 1.4(b) and (d)
¶1. (C) SUMMARY: On July 23 and 24, National Security Council
Senior Director William Inboden and Senior Advisor Paul
Lettow from the State Department's Global Affairs Bureau
briefed the U.S. proposal for an "Asia Democracy Partnership"
(ADP) (reftel) to the Ministry of Justice (MOJ), the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT), and with John Hayes, an
opposition party spokesman for foreign affairs. MFAT and MOJ
officials posed questions about how the initiative could be
most practically structured and implemented. MFAT officials
stated that New Zealand was in complete agreement with the
goal of ADP and is likely to participate from the beginning,
though the GNZ has not yet made a decision. At the same
time, MFAT desires to continue discussions with the USG to
address "modalities" and questions relating to the South
Pacific. END SUMMARY.
-----------------
ADP PRESENTATIONS
-----------------
¶2. (SBU) Inboden and Lettow provided three separate
briefings on the concept of ADP: to a roundtable organized by
MOJ; to a roundtable organized by MFAT; and to MP John Hayes.
Imboden and Lettow first explained the genesis and purpose
of ADP, which emerged from the lack of a central resource to
coordinate and promote democracy programs in the Pacific
region. They explained that ADP would provide a forum and a
structure for prioritizing and coordinating such programs
among donor nations and for receiving requests for assistance
from nascent and struggling democracies in the area.
Membership in ADP would be by invitation only.
Inboden/Lettow described ADP as being demand driven and
modular, similar to the Tsunami core group, and explained
that it would not function to raise funds, establish a
secretariat or implement military or other sanctions. The
SIPDIS
next step would be to establish an ADP "core group" at the
upcoming Community of Democracies meeting in Bamako in
November 2007. That group would invite potential members to
an organizational and planning meeting in January/February
2008 at a location to be determined. Inboden and Lettow
reported that India was supportive of the ADP concept, that
Indonesian parliamentarians embraced the idea, and that the
Japanese and Canadian governments also favored the plan. The
Australian government, they added, is currently studying the
proposal but is positive about it.
----------------------------
MINISTRY OF JUSTICE BRIEFING
----------------------------
¶3. (C) Officials representing MOJ consisted of Gregor Allan
(Manager, International Law), Boris van Beusekom (Senior
Advisor, International Law), Stuart Beresford (Manager,
Public Law), Malcolm Luey (Manager, Criminal Law), Kelvin
Ratnam (Senior Advisor, Criminal Law), Chelly Walton
(Criminal Law Team), and Professor Jim Veitch (Victoria
University and MOJ Consultant). The MOJ interlocutors
commented that many small Pacific countries are already
overburdened with reporting and fora responsibilities, some
of them duplicative, and it is important to not add to that
burden. They also stated that ASEAN currently has hundreds
of committees with plenty of talk and no action. It would be
counterproductive to undercut existing processes, though the
proposal should move forward if the new process has a
positive effect, perhaps using the Pacific Island Forum as a
good model. They also pointed out that some coordination in
this subject is already occurring within the Asia Development
Bank, and similar organizations. Adding the word "Pacific" to
the title of ADP was recommended as well, if the organization
is serious about including the entire region.
--------------------------------------------- -
WELLINGTON 00000653 002 OF 003
MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE BRIEFING
--------------------------------------------- -
¶4. (C) Officials representing MFAT included Carl Worker
(Director, Americas Division), Elizabeth Halliday
(Co-director, Americas Division), David Taylor (Director
North Asia Division) and Rupert Holborow (APEC Directors),
Tim McIvor (Asia Division), and Rich Woodham (NZAID). They
raised several issues relating to ADP membership, and asked
how membership would be determined? Would only states be
invited? For example, what about Taiwan and Hong Kong? They
commented that use of the term "Asia" in the organization's
title would not seem to cover Australia, New Zealand, the
Pacific Islands or, for that matter, the U.S. and Canada, and
suggested the term "Asia-Pacific" in the organization title.
They also commented that a narrow invitation-only membership
could create problems. For example, Indonesia would
naturally want to become a member, Malaysia would expect to
be invited, and China might expect to be involved as well.
They stated that China's response to ADP would be critical,
and even the use of the term "democracy" within the ADP title
could be problematic for China. Furthermore, they asked how
ADP would involve the large number of civil society
organizations which play a significant role in supporting
good governance within the region?
¶5. (C) MFAT representatives also expressed concern about
duplication of effort, noting that ASEAN already works to
address good governance issues among its members. They
suggested that ADP's integration within the ASEAN framework
would be crucial. Woodham of NZAID stressed the already
ongoing efforts of the Pacific Island Forum's Secretariat
(PIF) and its initiatives in building democratic institutions
in Pacific Island countries as possibly being duplicative.
MFAT officials emphasized that they supported the goals of
ADP, but that the structure and process raised some
questions. In the words of one MFAT interlocutor, "This is a
mine field. The goal is fine, but the process and details
will be difficult to work out. The challenge is how to do it
without creating more problems."
¶6. (C) Carl Worker, Americas Division Director, stated
that the GNZ desires to be closely abreast of USG efforts in
this area, and that MFAT will consult internally on the
proposal. He said he has every expectation that New Zealand
will join on. He asked that the U.S. keep New Zealand
informed as planning for the initial stages of the ADP goes
forward.
--------------------------------------------- -----
INBODEN AND LETTOW REPLY TO MOJ AND MFAT QUESTIONS
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶7. (SBU) Inboden and Lettow responded to comments by MOJ and
MFAT by emphasizing that the ADP would merely help to
prioritize and coordinate programs promoting democracy in the
region, and would operate without a secretariat or formal
structure that might overlap or encumber the activities of
other multilateral frameworks. The ADP structure would be
flexible and action-oriented, with the intent of
supplementing the efforts of existing organizations, and not
duplicating them. Participation would also be "modular"
(meaning that participants could opt-in or opt-out of
particular programs as they desire) and demand driven
(meaning that ADP activities would be determined largely by
the expressed needs of nations requesting assistance). NGOs
and other civil society partners that support democracy
programs would, of course, be invited to participate in ADP
efforts. Inboden and Lettow also recommended that the
initial efforts of ADP should modestly target "low-hanging
fruit" -- that is, easy to accomplish projects such as
facilitating parliamentary exchanges, or helping to establish
effective civil/military relations.
¶8. (SBU) Regarding the name of the organization and whether
''Pacific'' should be included in the title, Inboden and
WELLINGTON 00000653 003 OF 003
Lettow expressed openness to other monikers. In any event,
they emphasized that the name should not stand in the way of
going forward and that the USG is willing to consider other
titles.
-----------------------
MP JOHN HAYES' BRIEFING
-----------------------
¶9. (C) John Hayes commented that the concept and goal of ADP
would obviously receive widespread endorsement. However,
according to Hayes, the Pacific is already crowded with
similar regional architectures promoting democracy and good
governance. Small Pacific nations have limited ability to
participate in yet another regional forum. He cautioned that
any such initiative must demonstrate political accountability
and the capacity to make a significant difference. In order
to produce gains, Hayes suggested that ADP must have direct
ministerial-level participation and backing. Inboden and
Lettow both assured Hayes that the ADP would have full senior
level support within the NSC and State Department.
-----------------------
LATER COMMENT FROM MFAT
-----------------------
¶10. (C) on August 17, in a subsequent private conversation
between Carl Worker and DCM Dave Keegan, Worker stated that
while the GNZ has not yet made a decision on ADP, he could
not imagine that NZ would not participate. Although,
according to Worker, without Indonesia's participation it
will be difficult for other nations to join. He commented
that the GNZ shares the same objectives with respect to ADP
and is supportive, but the GNZ still has questions relating
to "modalities" and to the South Pacific, and wants to have
more constructive discussions on the subject when the USG is
ready. "We're in much the same space on this as Australia,"
he added.
¶11. (U) Senior Advisor Paul Lettow has cleared on this
message.
KEEGAN