

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09OTTAWA452, CANADA SEEKS MORE ANTI-TERRORIST TOOLS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09OTTAWA452.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09OTTAWA452 | 2009-06-10 20:59 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO5720
OO RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHMT RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0452/01 1612059
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 102059Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9539
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000452
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PTER PGOV PREL CA
SUBJECT: CANADA SEEKS MORE ANTI-TERRORIST TOOLS
REF: A. OTTAWA 338
- B. OTTAWA 198
- C. OTTAWA 079
- D. 08 OTTAWA 1578
- E. 08 TORONTO 286
- F. 08 TORONTO 114
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The federal government has begun a new
legislative push to restore two anti-terrorism tools --
investigative hearings and preventive arrest -- that lapsed in 2007.
Separately, the government has introduced a bill to allow victims
of state-sponsored terrorism to sue the perpetrators in Canadian
courts. The bill also mandates that the government create a list of
foreign states that sponsor or support terrorism. End summary.
LIBERALS ON SIDE, SECOND TIME AROUND
------------------------------------
¶2. (U) The federal government is again moving to restore two
anti-terrorism tools -- investigative hearings and recognizance with
conditions (preventive arrest) -- that lapsed in February 2007 under
sunset provisions in the 2001 Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA). The House
of Commons began debate on the bill (C-19) to amend the ATA on June
¶8. The bill is the government's third attempt to reinstate the
provisions, which security officials could use to disrupt imminent
terrorist attacks or gather information about an attack that had or
would have been committed. In debate on June 9, Liberal Public
Safety critic Mark Holland confirmed that Liberal MPs support the
government's bid to refer the bill to a lower house committee before
a late June recess, although they will work to amend it in committee
better to balance civil rights. Overall, however, Liberal MP Larry
Bagnell agreed his caucus is "very supportive of the concepts of the
bill."
A BITTER HISTORY
-----------------
¶3. (U) The ATA, which the then-Liberal government brought into law
in December 2001 in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, included
investigative hearings and recognizance with conditions. At the
time, human rights groups and some politicians claimed that the
legislation went too far in restraining civil liberties. As a
result, the government agreed to a five-year sunset clause on the
new powers. In a bitter debate in the House of Commons in February
2007, Liberal MPs combined with the other opposition parties to
defeat the minority Conservative government's motion to extend the
powers. Then-Liberal Party leader Stephane Dion argued that the
powers were no longer necessary and posed too great a risk to civil
liberties.
¶4. (U) The Conservatives pledged to restore the powers, calling them
"important tools" to enable law enforcement agencies to anticipate
and respond effectively to terrorist threats. In October 2007, the
government, unusually, introduced the bill in the Senate rather than
the lower house. The government said the tactic reflected its
desire to de-politicize the issue as well as to draw on the Senate's
expertise in conducting a mandatory review of the ATA. The bill
reinstated the two expired powers in a substantially similar form as
they had existed in the 2001 ATA, but added new safeguards for civil
rights. The Senate passed the legislation on March 6, 2008 and it
moved to the House of Commons, which was not able to act upon it
before the dissolution of Parliament for the October 2008 federal
election.
¶5. (U) The re-elected Conservative minority government reintroduced
the current bill in March 2009, this time in the House of Commons.
It is almost identical to the previous version, but with the extra
provision that Commons and Senate committees could conduct a
comprehensive review of the use or continuing need for the clauses
(although their recommendations would not be binding on the
government).
Qgovernment).
BALANCING SECURITY WITH CIVIL RIGHTS
------------------------------------
¶6. (U) Investigative hearings compel a person with information or
materials about a past or future terrorist offense to appear before
a judge and answer questions or provide material. The purpose is to
gather information, not to prosecute. The hearings are limited to
cases where reasonable grounds exist to believe that a terrorism
offense had been or would be committed. A police officer must
obtain the consent of the Attorney General to invoke the tool and
apply to a provincial court or higher court judge of a superior
court for an order for the hearing. The person compelled to appear
has the right to counsel at any stage of the proceedings. A witness
who evades the order, or is deemed by authorities about to abscond,
can be arrested without warrant and detained for up to thirty days
for the purpose of giving evidence at the hearing. The information
gained from the person cannot be used against him or her in any
criminal proceeding, except for perjury. An additional safeguard in
OTTAWA 00000452 002 OF 003
the bill requires police to satisfy the judge that "reasonable"
attempts have been made to obtain the information by other means.
¶7. (U) Recognizance with conditions (preventive arrest) gives the
police the authority to arrest a person without a warrant to disrupt
nascent terrorist activity and prevent aQ,%>|Qfer. A detained person must be
brought before a judge within 24 hours of his/her arrest or "as soon
as possible" up to a maximum of 72 hours of detention before a
hearing. If the judge is satisfied that reasonable grounds for
suspicion exist, the person could be required to enter into a
recognizance of conditions or conditional commitment (such as having
no contact with specified persons). The person could be imprisoned
for up to 12 months if he/she refuses to enter into the
recognizance.
¶8. (U) The bill includes another five-year sunset clause for both
provisions, as well as new annual reporting rules for the Attorney
General and the Minister of Public Safety to report to Parliament on
use of the powers, as well as their justification for extending the
provision.
¶9. (U) The two powers were never used when in force between 2001 and
¶2007. In 2004, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled investigative
hearings constitutional when it upheld an order for a hearing
arising from the Air India terrorist trial. However, the hearing
never took place, as the trial ended before the Court delivered its
ruling.
SECURING CONVICTIONS
--------------------
¶10. (U) The government has secured two convictions and one guilty
plea under the ATA (reftels):
-- an Ontario court convicted Momin Khawaja in October 2008 of
participating in terrorist training, financing, and facilitating
terrorism for his role in a conspiracy to bomb sites in London, U.K.
In March, the judge sentenced him to ten-and-a-half years
imprisonment, with no chance of parole for five years. Khawaja was
the first Canadian to be charged under the ATA;
-- a Toronto court convicted one youth (whose identify was publicly
protected under Canadian laws due to his age) in September 2008 of
participating in a terrorist activity and sentenced him in May 2009
to two-and-a-half years imprisonment. With credit for time served
since his arrest in June 2006, he was freed immediately, but on
probation. Another youth pled guilty in May 2009 to the same charge
and is awaiting sentencing. Both were members of the "Toronto 18,"
whom police arrested in June 2006 for allegedly conspiring to attack
Parliament and politicians as well as to bomb the Toronto offices of
CSIS, the RCMP, and CBC. Police have stayed charges against three
youths and four adults in the case, but nine other adults are
awaiting trial; and,
-- Moroccan-born Said Namouh came to Canada in 2003 and was arrested
in September 2007. He is currently in custody pending trial on
charges of creating and distributing jihad propaganda, and four
charges related to plotting terror attacks in Canada and Austria.
His bid to have the propaganda charges against him dropped on the
grounds that they infringed on his constitutional right to freedom
of speech failed on June 10, when a Montreal judge upheld the
constitutionality of the ATA.
LIFTING STATE IMMUNITY FOR SUPPORTERS OF TERRORISM
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶11. (U) In June, the government introduced a "Justice for Victims of
Terrorism" bill (C-35) to complement existing counter-terrorism
QTerrorism" bill (C-35) to complement existing counter-terrorism
measures and to allow victims of terrorism to sue perpetrators and
supporters of terrorism. The proposed bill would lift the immunity
of foreign states that the government designates as terrorism
supporters. The bill also establishes a listing mechanism for state
sponsors of terror. If the bill becomes law, the Minister of
Foreign Affairs, in consultation with the Minister of Public Safety,
would advise the government on the establishment of the list.
¶12. (U) The legislation would allow victims of terrorism who can
demonstrate a "real and substantial" connection between their case
and Canada to sue in a Canadian court those foreign states included
on the government's list. Plaintiffs would be able to seek redress
for terrorist acts committed anywhere in the world on, or after, 1
January 1985. Successful convictions could result in seizure of
assets and property. For claims related to terrorist acts committed
outside Canada, plaintiffs would have to give the foreign state in
which the incident occurred "reasonable opportunity" to submit the
OTTAWA 00000452 003 OF 003
dispute to arbitration in accordance with accepted international
rules of arbitration before applying to a Canadian court. In
tabling the legislation, Minister of Public Safety Peter Van Loan
insisted that Canada is sending a "clear message" that perpetrators
of terrorism and their supporters will be held accountable.
COMMENT
¶13. (SBU) Thus far, the debate on the ATA amendments has been
uncontroversial and, crucially, the Liberals appear supportive.
Debate on C-35 has not yet begun. Under new leader Michael
Ignatieff, the Liberals have been careful quietly to support the
robust Conservative anti-crime agenda in order to deprive the
Conservatives of a wedge issue in the next election. Similarly,
they are unlikely in principle to oppose, or substantially modify,
the anti-terrorism bills. The biggest worry now is whether the
bills -- notably the ATA amendments -- can make it through both
houses of Parliament before Canada faces another election, in which
case the draft legislation would again die and the next government
would face the choice of yet another re-introduction.
BREESE