

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08HALIFAX36, URANIUM MINING IN ATLANTIC CANADA: PROTESTS VERSUS PROFIT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08HALIFAX36.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08HALIFAX36 | 2008-05-28 11:59 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Consulate Halifax |
VZCZCXRO4856
RR RUEHGA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHHA #0036/01 1491159
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 281159Z MAY 08
FM AMCONSUL HALIFAX
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1283
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0529
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUEHHA/AMCONSUL HALIFAX 1371
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HALIFAX 000036
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA/CAN AND EB/ESC/IEC
USDOE FOR IA (DEUTSCH)
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EMIN ENRG ETRD PGOV PHUM CA
SUBJECT: URANIUM MINING IN ATLANTIC CANADA: PROTESTS VERSUS PROFIT
REF: A. 07 OTTAWA 001201; B. HALIFAX 0013
HALIFAX 00000036 001.2 OF 003
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. Considering there is a vociferous and devoted anti-uranium
lobby in Canada's Atlantic Provinces, it appears unlikely that
the region will be joining the world uranium club any time soon.
There are identified commercial quantities of uranium in three
of the four provinces that could be developed to meet growing
global demand for fuel for nuclear power plants. However,
mining companies have run up against government bans and hostile
citizen groups which could keep the uranium in the ground.
Although this is not the stated policy of any of the governments
involved, politicians are faced with weighing the cost of either
saying no to the anti-uranium forces or to the companies that
want to invest millions in their jurisdictions. END SUMMARY
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
OVERVIEW: URANIUM MINING (OR THE LACK OF) IN ATLANTIC CANADA
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
¶2. Skyrocketing prices and increasing global demand for clean
energy sources have sparked much interest in Atlantic Canada's
uranium deposits. Except for Prince Edward Island which has
only trace amounts of uranium, there are known commercial
quantities in the other Atlantic Provinces:
Newfoundland-Labrador, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. The full
size of these deposits is still being determined, but several
companies are keen to start planning for development. At
present there is no mining underway in the region. If the
anti-uranium forces get their way, there never will be.
¶3. Environmentalists, conservationists and a slew of community
and farming groups in each of the provinces have mounted vocal
protest campaigns against mining companies and business leaders
who want to realize the economic potential from the resource.
Coming down in the middle in the debate are the respective
provincial governments and one newly-established aboriginal
government. So far the politicians have walked a fine line
between the two sides: acknowledging the concerns of the
anti-mining forces, while at the same time endorsing the
industry's assertions that modern technology has lessened the
potential environmental and health impacts of uranium mining.
While the debate shares these commonalities across the region,
the situation in each province is unique and has forced each
government to come up with its own strategy for dealing with the
issues.
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
NEWFOUNDLAND-LABRADOR - STYMIED BY A NEW REGIONAL GOVERNMENT
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
¶4. The Labrador region of the province holds the most promise
of any potential uranium development in Atlantic Canada. Since
2005 Aurora, a private company owned by Vancouver and St. John's
interests, has been exploring in what is known as the Central
Mineral Belt of Labrador, part of the newly designated Inuit
territory of Nunatsiavut. (Detailed information about the
location and Aurora's activities is available on the company's
web site www.aurora-energy.ca). In 2006 the company identified
a substantial amount of uranium at two locations on the Belt,
Michelin and Jacques Lake. The company followed up those
discoveries with another drilling program in 2007 which saw four
additional satellite deposits identified. Aurora estimates that
the combined deposits contain 133 million pounds of uranium,
making the area one of the largest deposits outside
Saskatchewan, the province where all of Canada's active uranium
mines are currently located (Ref A).
¶5. Aurora's original development plan called for the company to
begin the regulatory process by the end of 2007 with an expected
start-up date in 2014. However, after a spirited backlash from
the Inuit community, the company postponed filing its plan in
order to provide residents more information on how it would deal
with the problem of drilling waste. But before they could
provide the information, the issue ended up with the Members of
the Territorial Assembly, who were forced to act to stop a
growing rift between those wanting a ban on uranium activities
and those wanting to see the multi-million dollar economic
benefits accrue to the region from mining the ore. The Assembly
failed to resolve the issue. On April 8 the members voted eight
to seven in favor of implementing a three-year moratorium on
uranium mining in the territory, but in consideration of the
exploration activities already underway, the moratorium only
targets development, not exploration.
¶6. The Nunatsiavut government officials plan to use the
HALIFAX 00000036 002.2 OF 003
moratorium to develop expertise on how to evaluate the impact of
such a large scale project. According to our local contacts,
however, the Assembly could revisit the issue before the end of
the moratorium, especially given the narrow margin of the vote.
Aurora is pledging to work collaboratively with government and
community leaders on assessing the impact of a development
program, which could go a long way in addressing the concerns of
the anti-mining side. For its part, the Newfoundland-Labrador
provincial government is not getting involved in the issue other
than to endorse the Nunatsiavut assembly's right to enact the
ban under the terms of its establishment in 2005. They also
stress that the current federal and provincial regulatory
regimes (which would still apply to any development plan) are
stringent enough to ensure that any drilling project will get a
full environmental assessment.
--------------------------------------------- ------
NOVA SCOTIA - UNDER PRESSURE TO SCRAP A 25-YEAR BAN
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶7. The province of Nova Scotia has had a moratorium on uranium
exploration and mining since 1982, when a small but influential
protest group convinced the government of the day to stop a
company from mining in a location in central Nova Scotia.
Subsequently, world uranium prices slumped and the issue
remained dormant until 2005 when a new local company called
Tripple Uranium Resources (www.capellaresources.com) started
prospecting on acreage near the abandoned site. Despite having
the word "Uranium" in its name, the company (a subsidiary of
Vancouver-based Capella Resources) asserts that it is not
looking for uranium at all, but iron ore, copper and gold. In
fact, the company readily acknowledges that under the terms of
the 1982 ban, it will have to stop its exploration work if it
encounters any mineral deposits exceeding 100 parts per million
of uranium.
¶8. Coincident with the resurrected interest in uranium was the
revival of the anti-uranium protestors who are now asking the
question of what will happen to the ban if Tripple hits a large
amount of uranium. The protestors allege that Tripple is
already pressuring the provincial government to lift the ban in
anticipation of finding commercial quantities of uranium. The
government has made no secret that senior officials have met
with Tripple representatives, but as one of our senior
government contacts told us officials are always willing to meet
with any company interested in developing the province's mineral
resources. For now the government's policy is an expressed
desire that both sides engage in an informed debate on the
issue; however, an all-party committee of the provincial
legislature recommended that the government maintain the ban.
The committee recommendation reinforces the lobbyists' position
that the government should enshrine the ban in legislation.
Currently it is contained in a cabinet decision which mining
opponents assert could be easily be rescinded.
--------------------------------------------- ----------------
New Brunswick - Demands for a Ban in a Nuke-Friendly Province
--------------------------------------------- ----------------
¶9. Tripple Uranium is also one of the companies involved in
uranium exploration in New Brunswick, along with CVRD-Inco. The
two companies are in competing prospecting activities in
southern New Brunswick. Both are keeping the results of their
respective exploration programs secret for proprietary reasons,
but the anti-uranium forces in that province have already
started pushing the provincial government for a ban on further
exploration and future development. That appears unlikely given
the province already has signed exploration agreements with the
companies involved. Furthermore, New Brunswick has the region's
only nuclear power station and is actively considering building
another one (Ref B). Nonetheless, the government is attempting
to respond to the opposition forces by holding public
information sessions beginning in June. That announcement on May
8 did little to placate the lobbyists who have already condemned
the province for deciding to hold the sessions after various
exploration programs are already underway.
-----------------------------------
COMMENT - OH THE POLITICS OF IT ALL
-----------------------------------
¶10. In the end it will no doubt be politics, not exploration
results, which will determine the speed of development of the
region's uranium resources. As our senior Nova Scotia
government contact commented, there is a certain political
timidness in governments even talking about these issues, and
for good reason. Any government leader who comes down on the
wrong side of the issue could expect to pay a heavy political
HALIFAX 00000036 003.2 OF 003
price at the ballot box. On the other side, companies have
already invested millions of dollars in exploration work so far
and will want to do more than just look at prospecting results.
Also, the governments are cognizant of how barriers to uranium
development might be perceived in the mining industry as a
whole, given that there is growing demand for the region's other
minerals.
¶11. For the immediate future, areas to watch will be: how
Aurora fares in its consultative work with the Nunatsiavut
Assembly in Newfoundland-Labrador and if that will result in
another vote on a ban; whether there are any moves to make Nova
Scotia's ban permanent; and in New Brunswick, how the government
fares in its upcoming information sessions. As these events
unfold, they should shed some light on when Atlantic Canada
might be joining the world uranium club, if at all. END COMMENT
FOSTER