

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06MADRID1914, COURT FREES "SPANISH TALIBAN"
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06MADRID1914.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06MADRID1914 | 2006-07-28 11:05 | 2010-11-30 12:00 | SECRET | Embassy Madrid |
VZCZCXRO3816
PP RUEHAG
DE RUEHMD #1914/01 2091105
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
P 281105Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY MADRID
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0384
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHLA/AMCONSUL BARCELONA PRIORITY 1994
RUCNFB/FBI WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 MADRID 001914
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/25/2016
TAGS: PTER PGOV PREL SP
SUBJECT: COURT FREES "SPANISH TALIBAN"
REF: A. 2005 MADRID 3528
¶B. TD-314/09169-05
MADRID 00001914 001.2 OF 003
Classified By: A/DCM Kathleen Fitzpatrick; reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)
¶1. (C) Summary. The Spanish Supreme Court announced July 24
that it had annulled the six-year prison sentence handed down
in September by Spain's National Court against accused
terrorist Hamed Abderrahaman Ahmed, known in the media as the
"Spanish Taliban." Abderrahaman, a Spanish national captured
in Afghanistan by U.S. forces and held at Guantanamo until
being turned over to Spanish authorities in February 2004,
was immediately released from prison. The Supreme Court
found that Spanish prosecutors could not use any evidence
collected during their interview with Abderrahaman while he
was being held at Guantanamo under conditions the Court
termed "impossible to explain, much less justify." The Court
threw out other evidence collected against Abderrahaman prior
to his capture in Afghanistan and determined that prosecutors
had skewed Abderrahaman's testimony to incriminate him. This
finding had an immediate effect on the case of Lahcen
Ikassrien, a Moroccan national and former Guantanamo detainee
tranferred to Spanish custody in July 2005. Prosecutors
announced their recommendation to release Ikassrien on bail
while awaiting trial on terrorism charges, while
Abderrahaman's attorney said he would sue the U.S. Government
for suffering allegedly suffered by Abderrahaman during his
incarceration in Guantanamo. Spanish officials involved in
the Abderrahaman case expressed disappointment in his
release, but also said that he was not particularly dangerous
and dismissed him as a threat. This ruling does not indicate
a reduction in counter-terrorism cooperation by Spanish law
enforcement officials, but the Supreme Court's decisions will
clearly have to be taken into account as we pursue improved
judicial cooperation with Spain. The Spanish judicial branch
carefully guards its hard-won indepence, meaning it will not
shy away from rulings that cut across Spanish Government (or
USG) objectives. End Summary.
//BACKGROUND//
¶2. (S) According to sentencing documents, Abderrahaman
established contacts with al-Qa'ida elements in the Spanish
enclave of Ceuta and, in August 2001, traveled to Afghanistan
for religious and military training in Kandahar. When the
U.S. invaded Afghanistan in the wake of the September 11
attacks, Abderrahaman fled to Pakistan, where he was
reportedly captured by the Pakistani military, who turned him
over to U.S. forces. Abderrahaman was transferred to
Guantanamo, where he was held until he was turned over to
Spanish authorities in February 2004 in response to a request
by magistrate Baltasar Garzon, who wanted to investigate
Abderrahaman in connection with the trial of al-Qa'ida cell
leader Imad Eddin Barakat Yarkas. Under the terms of that
transfer, Spanish authorities agreed to:
-- Be prepared to detain, investigate, and prosecute
Abderrahaman, while treating him humanely;
-- Share with USG authorities any information developed
during the investigation;
-- Provide reasonable notice of any decision to release or
transfer Abderrahaman;
-- Conduct surveillance of Abderrahaman following his
release, and share any relevant information with the U.S.;
and,
-- Provide U.S. officials access to Abderrahaman if necessary.
¶3. (S) Garzon released Abderrahaman on bail in July 2004,
finding that Spanish National Police interrogations of
Abderrahaman while he was being held in Guantanamo could not
be used as evidence. However, the National Police had
previous wiretap evidence linking Abderrahaman to Barakat
Yarkas as well as what they viewed as incriminating
statements by Abderrahaman to police investigators following
his release from Guantanamo. In early 2005, a confidential
police assessment shared with USG officials concluded that
Abderrahaman had the "mental maturity of a 12-year-old," was
"naive and foolish," and did not seem to comprehend the
gravity of his detention in Guantanamo. But the report also
noted Abderrahaman's consistent statements to Spanish police
that he wanted to "go fight with the Chechens and kill
Russians." (REF B). Police provided this information to
prosecutors and to the National Court, which found
MADRID 00001914 002.2 OF 003
Abderrahaman guilty in September 2005 of "membership in a
terrorist organization." The case was then automatically
transferred to the Supreme Court to either overturn or
confirm the sentence.
//SUPREME COURT THROWS OUT CONVICTION//
¶4. (U) The Supreme Court overturned Abderrahaman's conviction
on the basis that the National Court had allowed prosecutors
to use inadmissible evidence to establish Abderrahaman's
guilt and that prosecutors had improperly translated
Abderrahaman's incriminating testimony. Specifically, the
Supreme Court found that testimony obtained by Spanish police
investigators during the course of interviews of Abderrahaman
in Guantanamo could not be used in court because the
"interrogations, euphemistically called "interviews," took
place under unequal circumstances because (the defendant) was
in detention" at the time of the interrogations. Further,
the Supreme Court finding stated that "although it is not for
(this Court) to issue a pronouncement regarding the situation
of those held in indefinite detention, we must state that, as
Ahmed was held in detention under the authority of the U.S.
military since he was turned over (to the U.S.) on an
undetermined date, all information obtained under such
conditions must be declared totally null and nonexistent."
The Court did go on to pronounce its position on Guantanamo,
criticizing the detention of "hundreds of people, among them
Ahmed, without charges, without rights, without controls, and
without limits," a situation the Court termed "impossible to
explain, much less justify."
¶5. (U) Just as damaging to the prosecution's case was the
Court's decision to throw out telephone intercepts
incriminating Abderrahaman obtained during the course of the
Barakat Yarkas investigation and long before Abderrahaman's
detention in Afghanistan. The judges found that the
intercepts had been obtained improperly (NOTE: the Supreme
Court had already ruled against allowing the intercepts
during its review of the convictions of Barakat Yarkas cell
members). The Supreme Court also determined that prosecutors
had improperly translated Abderrahaman's statements and had
omitted exculpatory evidence, such as Abderrahaman's
declaration that he did not belong to al-Qa'ida and had not
received military training. The Court criticized prosecutors
for omitting a document "signed in Guantanamo by Abderrahaman
before being turned over to Spanish authorities," a document
in which U.S. authorities allegedly acknowledged that
Abderrahaman was not a member of al-Qa'ida. On this basis,
the Supreme Court found that the case against Abderrahaman
failed to meet the minimum standards established by the
European Court of Human Rights for a finding of "guilty
beyond a reasonable doubt."
¶6. (C) Legat contacted Eduardo Fungairino, currently the head
of an anti-terrorism office assigned to the Supreme Court and
formerly the chief of the National Prosecutor's office, on
July 25 for his insights into the Abderrahaman decision.
Fungairino (strictly protect) dismissed the Supreme Court
decision as "facile and populist." He said that while he
acknowledged errors on the part of National Court prosecutors
in the case (and the legal problems generated by the
circumstances at Guantanamo), in his view the Supreme Court
ignored evidence of Abderrahaman's terrorist training in
Pakistan and Afghanistan, activities that are clearly
criminal under Spanish law. Fungairino indicated that one
consolation, in his view, was that Abderrahaman did not
represent a serious threat, echoing police assessments that
Abderrahaman was a pawn in events beyond his understanding
(see para 3).
//ABDERRAHAMAN PLANS TO SUE USG//
¶7. (U) In a July 25 press conference organized by
Abderrahaman attorney Marcos Garcia Montes, Abderrahaman told
reporters that he hoped to gain employment as a truck driver
and claimed that his vision had degraded so much during his
detention in Guantanamo that he was unfit for other
employment. Garcia Montes said that he planned to file a
"multimillion dollar suit" against the U.S. Government for
damages, including post-traumatic stress and vision loss on
the part of his client. The attorney told reporters that
Abderrahaman's suffering had been such that he could no
longer recall specific elements of his detention in
Guantanamo, nor of his time in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Abderrahaman roundly denied ever having been a terrorist and
insisted that his prior references to himself as a "martyr"
referred to his treatment in detention. Prompted by his
MADRID 00001914 003.2 OF 003
attorney, Abderrahaman related his alleged mistreatment in
U.S. detention, including the presence of a powerful
lightbulb in his cell that impeded sleep and threats that he
would never see his family again. Abderrahaman said he
planned to write a book about his experiences.
//IKASSRIEN ALSO TO BE RELEASED//
¶8. (U) Following the Supreme Court decision in the
Abderrahaman case, National Court prosecutors announced that
they would support the release on bail of Moroccan national
Lahcen Ikassrien, who was transferred to Spain from
Guantanamo in July 2005 and held in preventive detention
since his arrival. This comes less than a month after
prosecutors filed formal charges against Ikassrien, seeking
an eight-year prison term on charges of membership in a
terrorist organization. The case against Ikassrien is based
on three police interviews with him when he was being held at
Guantanamo (by the same investigators who interviewed
Abderrahaman) and on telephone intercepts developed in the
course of the Barakat Yarkas investigation, the same evidence
thrown out in the Abderrahaman case. (NOTE: According to
press reports, the Spanish police intercepts place Ikassrien
in Istanbul, Turkey in November 2000 along with suspected
terrorists Amer Azizi and Said Berraj. In a separate
intercept, Ikassrien requested assistance with documentation
from al-Qa'ida cell leader Barakat Yarkas). Prosecutors have
maintained that Ikassrien's own testimony since his transfer
from Guantanamo incriminates him since he has acknowledged
traveling to Afghanistan to "collaborate with the Islamist
regime." That is disputed by court observers who say that
Ikassrien's statements to the National Court have been
substantially less incriminating than those of Abderrahaman
¶9. (U) Ikassrien's attorney has already homed in on
Guantanamo as key to his client's defense, focusing on
Ikassrien's alleged mistreatment while in US custody. The
attorney's request claims that "while Ikassrien was in
Guantanamo, he was gassed, beaten, mistreated, and insulted,
and subject to repeated inspections, during which the
military officials undertaking the inspections would damage
or destroy (Ikassrien's) books, especially the Koran."
Ikassrien's attorney also alleges that his client was
forcibly injected with a substance that led to severe itching
that continues to affect him.
//COMMENT//
¶10. (C) Spanish counter-terrorism legislation was designed
over three decades to combat ETA, a group with a defined
structure, doctrine, and modus operandi. Police,
prosecutors, and magistrates working on investigations of the
far more amorphous cells of Islamist extremist have struggled
to develop evidence sufficient to meet the high threshhold
set by the Spanish Supreme Court. This was reflected in an
earlier decision by the Supreme Court to reverse the
convictions of several Barakat Yarkas cell members and to
reduce Barakat Yarkas' sentence on the basis that prosecutors
had not proved his connection to the September 11 attacks in
the U.S. (USG observers of the trial noted that the evidence
on the September 11 connection was indeed weak). Clearly, in
the Abderrahaman case the Supreme Court was also eager to use
this case as a platform to criticize U.S. detainee policies
in Guantanamo. While this sentiment has not influenced
Spanish police to reduce their close collaboration with the
U.S. in fighting terrorism, we must take it into account as
we pursue increased judicial cooperation with Spain in
terrorism cases. The Spanish judiciary carefully guards its
independence (a major achievement of the post-Franco era) and
has not shied from taking decisions that cut across the
obectives of the Spanish Government.
AGUIRRE