

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09PARIS264, S/WCI AMBASSADOR WILLIAMSON DISCUSSES GUANTANAMO
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PARIS264.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09PARIS264 | 2009-02-20 16:53 | 2010-11-30 16:30 | SECRET//NOFORN | Embassy Paris |
VZCZCXYZ0009
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHFR #0264/01 0511653
ZNY SSSSS ZZH (CCY AD3230EB MSI1033-695)
O 201653Z FEB 09
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5580
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
S E C R E T PARIS 000264
NOFORN
SIPDIS
C O R R E C T E D COPY CAPTION
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/19/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL MOPS PTER PHUM KAWK KISL KPAO FR
SUBJECT: S/WCI AMBASSADOR WILLIAMSON DISCUSSES GUANTANAMO
BAY DETAINEES WITH FRENCH OFFICIALS
REF: A. SECSTATE 6516
¶B. PARIS 00119
¶C. PARIS 02016
¶D. VILNIUS 88
Classified By: POL MC Kathleen H. Allegrone for reasons 1.4 (B & D).
¶1. (S/NF) SUMMARY: S/WCI Ambassador Williamson met with
French MFA officials on February 16 to discuss detainee
issues, France's role in the EU process and possible
resettlement of Guantanamo Bay detainees in France.
Williamson noted that France has a unique role to play in
formulating a process within the European Union (EU) to
accept detainees and helping assuage the concerns of member
states that might stymie EU consensus on the issue. Foreign
Ministry Director of Communications and spokesman Eric
Chevallier reiterated France's willingness to assist the U.S.
on this issue (ref b and c), but noted that the GOF position
was "very clear": detainees would be reviewed on a
case-by-case basis; the detainee had to specifically request
resettlement in France; and France would need full
information on interested detainees to review any security
and judicial implications. Chevallier said the GOF supports
an open EU process that would allow decisions to be made on a
national basis, similar to what current EU president the
Czech Republic has proposed. The most important issue, he
said, would be addressing concerns among Schengen countries.
Williamson said the U.S. is aware of the complexities of the
Schengen issue and pledges to work with EU partners as they
address these concerns. Chevallier said the GOF was also
concerned about recent USG talks with Lithuania on detainees
(ref d). France, he cautioned, was standing firm on the
necessity of an EU process before implementation of bilateral
agreements between the USG and EU member states on the
matter. Williamson noted that recent public pledges by
Lithuania to accept Guantanamo detainees were the result of
almost two years of talks, and that Lithuania has been firm
that implementation of an agreement to accept detainees would
occur only after agreement of a common EU position.
¶2. (S/NF) SUMMARY CONTINUED: Chevallier noted French concern
that former detainees, after being released from Guantanamo,
could return to or become involved in terrorist activities.
Williamson noted that of the approximately 60 detainees for
whom the U.S. was seeking resettlement all had been
previously approved for transfer. Chevallier asked if there
were any USG plans to transfer detainees to other parts of
the U.S. without the promise of a swift trial and if the U.S.
was going to accept some of these low-risk detainees.
Chevallier claimed that the more information France had
regarding these issues the better able it would be to
persuade the French public and other EU member states by
highlighting U.S. efforts to resettle the detainees.
Williamson replied that the interagency review process headed
by the Attorney General would try to answer these and other
questions regarding the detainees. Chevallier gave his
support to help with future meetings on this issue with the
French ministries of justice and the interior. END SUMMARY.
¶3. (SBU) S/WCI Ambassador Clint Williamson met on February 16
with French MFA advisors to the foreign minister Eric
Chevallier and Sylvie Pantz, as well as with MFA Desk Officer
for Strategic Affairs Camille Petit. Charg Mark Pekala,
Embassy poloff and Shaun Coughlin (S/WCI) also participated.
Detainees: French Open to Helping U.S.
--------------------------------------
¶4. (S/NF) In response to President Obama's January 22
Executive Order to close detention facilities at Guantanamo
Bay Naval Base (ref a), French FM Kouchner publicly gave his
support to review the idea of accepting detainees deemed not
to be a security risk (ref b). S/WCI Ambassador Williamson
followed up with advisors to the French foreign minister on
February 16 to seek GOF cooperation on the resettlement of
Guantanamo detainees. Williamson noted that President Obama
and Secretary Clinton strongly believe closing the detention
center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba is a critical foreign policy
issue facing the USG. Secretary Clinton asked Williamson to
meet with European partners to explain the USG position on
this matter since the change of administration. Williamson
thanked France for its help on this issue, noting that France
has a unique role to play in formulating a process within the
European Union (EU) to accept detainees and helping assuage
the concerns of member states that might stymie EU consensus
on the issue.
¶5. (S/NF) Foreign Ministry spokesman Eric Chevallier
reiterated France's willingness to assist the U.S. on this
issue (ref b and c), but clarified the GOF position:
detainees would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis; the
detainee had to specifically request resettlement in France;
and France would need full information on interested
detainees in order to review any security and judicial
implications. Chevallier said the GOF was "happy, in
principal" that the prison would be closed, but noted that
any agreement by France to accept detainees could not be
centered on discussions of "numbers" (i.e., France, and other
EU members, cannot be told they have to accept a specific
number of detainees).
French Stress Importance of Common EU Position
--------------------------------------------- -
¶6. (S/NF) Chevallier said the GOF supports an open EU process
that would allow decisions to be made on a national basis,
similar to what the Czech Republic has been proposing. The
most important issue, he said, would be addressing concerns
among Schengen countries. Williamson said the U.S. was aware
of the complexities of the Schengen issue and pledged to work
with EU partners as they address these concerns. Williamson
said the USG was concerned about the potential for any EU
process to drag out, especially by EU member states that did
not want to accept detainees. The USG hopes that France
could play an important role to assuage these concerns.
Chevallier noted that while there would not be complete
consensus within the EU on whether to accept detainees the
GOF would push other EU member states to be more open. There
was room for EU evolution in a common position, he said.
Williamson also noted that EU members Ireland and Portugal
were wary of an EU process that did not allow for
flexibility, as what happened when both of these countries
were directed by the EU to take Palestinian militants
involved in the 2002 siege of the Church of the Nativity in
Bethlehem. Chevallier said that Church of the Nativity
scenario was unlikely to happen again. Rather, a solution
such as what the Czechs were now proposing seemed more likely
as it hinged on flexibility.
¶7. (S/NF) Chevallier said the GOF was also concerned about
recent USG talks with Lithuania on the matter (ref d); he
hoped Williamson could provide him with more details on those
discussions. Regarding Lithuania, Williamson noted that
recent public statements by that government to accept
Guantanamo detainees were the result of almost two years of
talks. He said that Lithuania was interested in accepting
some of the Uzbek detainees because these detainees -- as was
deemed by the GOL -- could best fit into Lithuanian society
due to a common language and the presence of a large Uzbek
population in the country. Williamson clarified that the GOL
intended to implement a decision to accept these detainees
only once an EU framework had been agreed on. Williamson
also explained that the U.S. would continue to pursue
bilateral discussions with interested states as the EU
process progressed. He said that it would create inordinate
delays if bilateral discussions had to be put on hold until
the EU process was completed, and stressed that this was
entirely consistent with the preferred Czech approach of
creating a "permissive EU environment in which member states
could decide to accept detainees." Chevallier agreed that
this was a logical way forward.
Detainees: French Concerns about Security
-----------------------------------------
¶8. (S/NF) Sylvie Pantz said the GOF was concerned about the
reliability of information now available on detainees. She
said that the GOF would need as much case information as
possible in order to make a proper assessment. Pantz noted
that recent requests by the NGO community -- Reprieve and
Human Rights Watch -- to the GOF to accept detainees lacked
details, which made it difficult to verify claims of abuse
and assess security concerns. She was hoping the U.S. could
help fill these gaps. Williamson noted that a major change
within the Obama administration's approach was moving lead
responsibility for detainee status reviews from the
Department of Defense to the Department of Justice. The
Attorney General would now lead the interagency process.
Williamson said the process would ensure that all information
pertaining to a detainee was compiled in one place, that
fresh reviews of the material would take place in order to
determine prosecutability and that renewed threat assessments
would be undertaken. He said the USG was happy to facilitate
visits to Guantanamo to interview detainees who might be
resettled, as well as share medical and case records. So
far, he noted, there were 60 low-risk detainees who had been
previously approved for transfer and it was unlikely the
security assessment for these individuals would be raised,
although it was possible.
¶9. (S/NF) Pantz and Chevallier asked about recent reports of
detainees who, after being released, return to or become
involved in terrorist activities. Chevallier said there were
concerns in France that detainees determined to be low-risk
before entering Guantanamo could, depending on their
experiences in the detention center, pose serious risks to
security once released. Williamson said that out of the 525
detainees already released, over 500 returned to their home
countries. Forty to 60 of these individuals were thought to
have engaged in some sort of terrorist actions, ranging from
minor to larger acts, such as reports of detainees returning
to the battlefield in Iraq or Afghanistan. However, he
noted, all of these cases had been previously assessed as
higher risk, which was very different from the detainees for
whom the U.S. was now seeking to resettle. Williamson said
threat level assessments were based on the present state of
the detainee, taking into account interviews, psychiatric
evaluations and other reviews. He indicated that the one
other case of low-threat detainee resettlements, to Albania,
had gone well and that the eight former detainees had
assimilated to varying degrees into life there. Further,
France could be assured that the U.S. would share any
security concerns regarding the detainees with its friends
and allies.
French Questions about U.S. Plans to Resettle Detainees
--------------------------------------------- ----------
¶10. (S/NF) Chevallier asked if there were any USG plans to
transfer high-risk detainees to the U.S. without the promise
of a swift trial. He also asked if the U.S. was going to
accept some of the low-risk detainees. Chevallier noted that
more information France had regarding these issues the better
able it would be to persuade the French public and other EU
member states by highlighting U.S. efforts to find a solution
to the detainee issue. Williamson replied that the
interagency review process would try to answer these and
other questions regarding the detainees. That aside, he said
the Obama administration realizes it would be a bad idea to
simply move detainees from one place to another as it would
not adequately address the problem. Pantz asked whether
detainees who could not return home but were seeking to be
resettled would simply receive a wish list of potential
accepting countries. Williamson said the U.S. was looking
into options to establish links with potential accepting
nations and the detainee, such as what was recently done with
the Uzbeks and Lithuania, but clarified that the USG was
reluctant to simply ask detainees where they would like to go
as it could complicate the resettlement process.
Future Talks: Offer to Help
---------------------------
¶11. (S/NF) Chevallier suggested that for future visits
Williamson should also speak to representatives from the
French ministries of justice and the interior. He said the
MFA would take the lead on setting up these meetings for
Williamson,s next visit to France.
¶12. (U) SWCI Williamson has cleared this message.
PEKALA