

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA3317, CANADA: LAYTON PULLS THE PLUG -- THE GOMERY EFFECT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA3317.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA3317 | 2005-11-07 21:35 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
072135Z Nov 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 003317
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CA PGOV PREL
SUBJECT: CANADA: LAYTON PULLS THE PLUG -- THE GOMERY EFFECT
ON THE PARTIES, ELECTION TIMING, KEY LEADERS, AND BILATERAL
RELATIONS
¶1. (SBU) Summary: NDP Leader Jack Layton announced today that
the NDP cannot express confidence in the Martin government,
and "the life of this Parliament is limited," after receiving
what he considered an inadequate Liberal response to NDP
concerns over creeping privatization in health care. Layton
did not go so far as to say when he would try to bring the
government down and the other opposition leaders were just as
cautious, but there is now a greater possibility of a
snap-election. This possibility is increased by the recent
sharp (albeit probably temporary) rise in Conservative
fortunes in the polls. For the U.S. this means further
distraction for a weak minority government in Canada, which
will remain in campaign mode for the foreseeable future. End
Summary
GOMERY REPORT PART I EXONERATES MARTIN
--------------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) Part I of the Gomery Inquiry was released November
¶1. The report, subtitled "Who Is Responsible?" attempts to
assign blame for the scandal while the second report, due out
February 1, will make recommendations on avoiding a similar
mishap in the future. The report essentially exonerates the
current government and, significantly, PM Martin, whom the
report stated was responsible as Finance Minister for setting
department budgets but not managing them. Former Prime
Minister Jean Chrtien and persons close to him took the bulk
of the blame for creating and operating the program in a way
that left it open to abuse. High-ranking members of the
Quebec Liberal Party and several Quebec advertising agencies
were also pegged with abusing the program for personal gain,
and in some cases to funnel money to the Quebec Wing of the
Liberal Party.
BUT SO WHAT
-----------
¶3. (SBU) The upcoming "recommendations" section of the report
was supposed to draw the greatest attention, but it appears
most observers, especially the opposition parties, are more
than satisfied to attack the Liberal Government now. It also
appears that the Canadian people are not letting the PM off
the hook, at least not in the short term. A poll released
over the weekend conducted by the Strategic Counsel for the
Globe and Mail and CTV news showed the Conservatives ahead at
31 percent and the Liberals at 28 percent, with the NDP also
up to 20 percent and the Bloc steady at 12. (Polling data
from three weeks ago had the Liberals at 38, Conservatives at
25, and NDP at 17). Results in Ontario put the Conservatives
at 35, Liberals at 37, and NDP at 20, also a significant
slippage for the Liberals.
¶4. (SBU) Significantly, 60 percent of respondents do not
accept the findings that PM Martin was not involved, and 71
percent believe that Martin should be held accountable. Also
of interest, both parties are given equally low marks for
their ability to clean up the mess (20 percent each). But
regardless of how they feel about Liberal culpability for the
affair, 60 percent of respondents support the idea of waiting
until the 2d report is issued before going to the polls. It
would take a lot of scandal to get people here to support a
deep winter election.
DOES IT GET ANY BETTER THAN THIS?
---------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) What the opposition parties will do with this
scandal-driven traction is still an open question. According
to Strategic Counsel Chairman Allan Gregg, "the temptation to
defeat the government will be overwhelming, since the
opposition parties know that when the issue fades, their
fortunes will fade with it." Indeed there seems to be new
enthusiasm and some buzz coming from the Conservatives about
defeating the government, although just when and how to do so
is still under review.
¶6. (SBU) Stephen Harper has stated that he will not bring the
government down without the NDP on board, presumably because
he doesn't want to be painted as being in narrow coalition
with the separatist Bloc. He was in Montreal November 7
trying to convince Quebec federalists that the Conservatives
are a viable option for those who cannot stomach the Bloc.
This comes on the heels of a proposal November 4 for
improving government ethics -- a Federal Accountability Act
that would implement a series of measures to clean up the
ties between private money and lobbyists and politics. The
Bloc has said it does not want to see a winter election but
was otherwise quiet about its intentions until today.
NDP ASSUMES THE OPPOSITION HELM
-------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) The decision then rested with Jack Layton and the
NDP. In a speech November 7 Layton answered a letter from
Health Minister Dossanjh outlining the government's offer to
support the NDP health care position by saying that "what the
government is proposing is unacceptable." While stopping
short of stating how and when he would seek to bring the
government down, Layton said that he "does not believe there
are grounds to go forward" with the Liberals and "the life of
this Parliament is limited." He suggested that the Canadian
people should not have to wait for months to bring the
government to account for sponsorship. After the speech
Layton clarified that the NDP could not support the Liberals
in a confidence motion. Political Analyst Keith Boag said he
didn't see much room for future Liberal negotiations with
Layton over the issue, although some have suggested that it
may be a ploy to gain more leverage. This will be clear
within the next day or two.
¶8. (SBU) The Conservatives reacted cautiously to the
announcement (in part because Harper spoke without having
seen it), while the Bloc confirmed that if the other two
opposition parties got their act together to defeat the
Liberal government, his party would definitely not support
the Liberals. The issue now is when a confidence motion
could actually come to the floor. The Conservatives have an
Opposition Day on November 15 which has a no-confidence
motion waiting on the order paper. Harper had said he would
only go through with this if supported by the NDP. The Bloc
has its Opposition Day on the 17th and the NDP on the 24th.
But the Liberals have been conducting a filibuster of the
Commons process over a Bloc Quebecois mailing on the
Sponsorship program that could push back some or all of these
Opposition Days. The next key date will be December 8 when
there is vote on the spending supplemental which will be a
firm confidence vote.
TIMING IS EVERYTHING
--------------------
¶9. (SBU) All of the parties are trying in all of this to
avoid being responsible for bringing on an election in "deep
winter." The worst case would be responsibility for bringing
the election on during the Christmas season, but anything in
January would be only slightly less unpopular. It is,
however, quickly getting to the point where it will be
difficult for the opposition parties to maneuver to avoid a
crash by supporting the government as they did for a time in
the spring to avoid a summer election. If the NDP does not
walk back from today's gauntlet quickly, all three parties
will be on record as not supporting the government, and there
are no numbers games that could avert a fall in that case.
¶10. And even if the NDP were brought back in the fold, the
numbers are currently not in the government's favor. If
everyone votes (i.e. no illnesses), and the Independents
split 2-2, the Conservatives and Bloc have the votes to bring
down the government) The breakdown is:
Liberals 133 (minus the Speaker who only votes in a tie)
NDP 18
151
Conservatives 98 (three members are ill enough to
possibly miss a vote)
Bloc 54
152
Independents 4 (former Liberals Carloyn Parrish, David
Kilgour, and Pat O'Brien, and former NDP member Desjarlais;
in the last confidence vote Parrish and Desjarlais, the
latter still in the NDP, voted with the government, Kilgour
and O'Brien voted against)
Vacancy 1
CANADA'S NEW REALITY SHOW -- LIBERAL SURVIVOR
---------------------------------------------
¶11. (SBU) The Liberals will be scrambling over the coming
days to devise a survival strategy. Speaker Milliken
indicated to Ambassador that it would be possible using the
filibuster to avert the demise of the government; we
certainly saw in the last term that the Liberals have an
excellent capacity to manipulate the calendar. Finance
Minister Goodale is scheduled to give an annual economic
update on November 14 in which he is expected to highlight PM
Martin's current and future good stewardship of the economy
in what he calls a prosperity plan -- showing that the
Liberals have a viable strategy for the future by promoting
education and skills training, infrastructure, and research
and development. He could still include tax cuts and
spending as well. PM Martin has suggested, in what sounds a
bit desperate, that the country would not be well-served by a
government crash in the midst of its hosting of the climate
change conference. But it is difficult to see how they can
avoid the moment of truth over the
budget vote in early December, and if the NDP doesn't back
down fairly quickly and come back to the table, it is equally
difficult to see how it would endure.
U.S. INTERESTS
--------------
¶12. (SBU) For the U.S. this means simply that the Martin
government is far less stable and able to focus at the end of
the day November 7 than it was when at the start of the day.
It will for the near future be consumed with its own survival
and virtually incapable of pursuing ambitious or far-reaching
policies. Every initiative or change of policy course will
be vetted through the lens of political calculation. If
there is a campaign, all sides will need to keep a healthy
distance from the United States, and the Liberals and
Conservatives will also need to show the ability to work with
the U.S. on shared issues while standing up to the Yankees
during disputes. It is not clear whether issues like
softwood will be a direct campaign prop, but it has of late
faded into the background. Who could gain points from it
during a campaign is also not clear -- the Conservatives
could presumably beat up the Liberals for not having the kind
of relationship with the U.S. that would allow them to solve
such disputes, while the Liberals could try to show strength
by ratcheting up the rhetoric. But the campaign will be
fought over the single issue of simple government
accountability, and both sides will probably have their hands
full managing that one topic.
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa
WILKINS