

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE168, COSTA RICA: STRATEGY FOR ADVANCING IPR
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE168.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE168 | 2009-03-12 18:58 | 2011-03-21 16:30 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0168/01 0711858
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 121858Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0578
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 5054
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000168
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
EEB/TPP/IPE FOR JURBAN AND SKEAT
PLEASE PASS TO DOJ FOR BLIPMAN
PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR DOLIVER, AMALITO AND GVETERE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON KIPR PGOV PREL CS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA: STRATEGY FOR ADVANCING IPR
REF: A) 07 SAN JOSE 0335
B) 08 SAN JOSE 0155
C) 09 SAN JOSE 0138
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Post leveraged the February 10-14 visit by
Department of Justice OPDAT Program Director Robert Lipman and U.S.
Judge Virginia Hernandez Covington to advance our three-point
strategy on intellectual property rights (IPR) enforcement. Our
strategy seeks to (1) facilitate USPTO, DOJ, and other sources of
training for the Costa Rican judiciary, (2) encourage greater IPR
cooperation between other Latin American countries and Costa Rica,
and (3) collaborate on private sector IPR lobbying/pursuit of IPR
case resolution. Our aim is to slowly move the cause of IPR ahead
in Costa Rica, despite the minimal engagement of the Attorney
General (AG) on these issues. Lipman and Covington met with a broad
sampling of stakeholders (including the AG, and Mexican prosecutors,
via a DVC) in order to present a thorough overview of IPR issues.
Specific next steps include: pursuing DOJ-offered training for
judges at Costa Rica's Judicial School, supporting a private sector
alliance for prosecuting IPR crimes, engaging the AG's office on
training opportunities for prosecutors, and encouraging further
collaboration with the GOM and other regional countries on IPR
training and DVC exchanges. END SUMMARY.
------------------------------
SESSIONS WITH THE STAKEHOLDERS
------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) The Lipman/ Covington February 10-14 visit provided us the
opportunity to engage with a variety of stakeholders on IPR issues.
We arranged for meetings with the following institutions/ groups:
-- Judicial Investigative Agency (OIJ, FBI-equivalent);
-- University of Costa Rica;
-- National Registry (similar to USPTO in function);
-- Ministry of Public Security;
-- Judicial School;
-- Judicial branch IP attorneys;
-- Costa Rican Attorney General;
-- a forum of private sector executives;
-- a forum of judicial and legal officials; and
-- a DVC collaboration with Mexican IPR prosecutors (courtesy of
Embassy Mexico City).
¶3. (SBU) Typically, DOJ conducts a training module when it arrives
in country. However, due to the unique IPR circumstances in Costa
Rica -- recently passed legislation as part of CAFTA-DR entry into
force (EIF), an AG independent of the executive branch, and a lax
legal environment (Refs A, B, and C) -- Post and DOJ decided a
series of meetings with stakeholders would generate the best
information and guide overall engagement on IPR and tactics for IPR
training in Costa Rica.
-----------------------
PROFILE OF AN OBSTACLE
----------------------
¶4. (U) As reported in previous Special 301 Reports (Refs A, B, and
C), the office of the Costa Rican AG sits in the judicial branch,
(fiercely) independent of the executive branch. Within the judicial
branch, the President of the Judiciary (the President of the Supreme
Court) has only nominal authority over the office of Attorney
General. Thus, the AG office holder, in this case, Francisco
Dall'Anese, exercises broad powers and exerts independence from the
other branches of government including the judiciary.
¶5. (SBU) Currently, our relations with the AG are cordial and
formal. The formal aspect results from the AG's requirement that
all contact with the office of the AG on any issue, consular,
judicial, anti-drugs, trafficking in persons, IPR, etc., be
channeled through the Director, Office of Technical Assistance and
International Relations, Andrea Murillo. This "gatekeeper" approach
tends to constrain the pace and efficiency of communication.
Dall'Anese was re-elected to a second four-year term in late 2007,
but our contacts speculate that he is unlikely to run for a third
term in 2011.
¶6. (U) Regarding IPR, the AG repeatedly states two issues:
-- the AG's office does not have the resources to pursue IPR crimes
given other priorities, i.e. prosecuting two former Presidents and
organized crime; and
-- the private sector has the resources so it should prosecute IPR
crimes through civil and/or criminal action.
This publicly stated position posed a difficult issue for the GOCR
during CAFTA-DR implementation. The Ministry of Foreign Trade
(COMEX) agreed to USTR's request to establish a special IPR
prosecutor's office, which required then Vice President Laura
Chinchilla (now a presidential candidate) to request the AG to
establish the office. The AG committed to assigning responsibility
for IPR issues to an individual within the Miscellaneous Crimes
unit, but not to setting up a dedicated unit/office per se. Thanks
to USPTO and DOJ training opportunities in late 2008, we were able
to establish relations with the Miscellaneous Crimes issues (through
Director Murillo).
------------------------------------
ALTERNATIVE PATHS AROUND AN OBSTACLE
------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) Considering the AG's IPR views and tactics, we designed a
three-point strategy for achieving IPR progress in the short and
long run, which, we hope, will chip away at resistance in the
judiciary.
-- First, invite all relevant components of the judiciary to as many
IPR-related training sessions (USPTO, DOJ, etc.) as possible. In a
conversation with the Ambassador in August 2008, Supreme Court
President Luis Paulino Mora indicated his interest in DOJ training
while affirming that there is a "cultural or reluctance" in Latin
America against IPR prosecution. We will use his interest to help
support our efforts (even if the AG's office is less cooperative at
times);
-- Second, in the interest of broadening the horizons of Costa Rican
prosecutors and attorneys, we contacted other U.S. Embassies in the
region to identify IPR prosecutors/ supporters working on the
frontline of enforcement. During the Lipman/ Covington visit, a DVC
linked Mexican IPR prosecutors (broadcasting from Embassy Mexico)
with Costa Rican prosecutors (broadcasting from Costa Rican
prosecutor's office). The exchange produced an informative
dialogue. In terms of pursuing cases and the formal organization of
IPR within the respective judiciaries, Mexico is certainly ahead of
Costa Rica. As a result of the DVC, Mexico offered to help Costa
Rica with IPR training. (COMMENT: Embassy San Jose thanks Econoff
Joseph Salazar of Embassy Mexico for making the arrangements with
Mexican IPR prosecutors and facilitating the DVC in Embassy Mexico
City. END COMMENT); and
-- Third, the Costa Rican private sector maintains a very different
view of IPR than the AG and believes that innovation must be
protected. During the Lipman/ Covington visit, key officials from
AmCham, the chamber of exporters, the chamber of information and
communications technology, and private law practices met with
Lipman, Covington and Emboffs to advance the idea of the private
sector aggressively pursuing IPR cases through a cooperative
alliance. Cases could be civil or criminal, since Costa Rican law
allows for private parties to pursue criminal cases in loose
cooperation with the AG's office. Such legal actions would
(hopefully) force the judiciary to recognize the importance of IPR
protection to Costa Rican commerce and highlight the issue in the
local media.
¶8. (U) Separate but related to our efforts, COMEX is strongly
supporting the IPR Council, a multi-agency body that meets weekly to
discuss IPR issues. Headed by the Ministry of Justice, the
Council's members include representatives from the Ministries of
Public Security, Science and Technology, and Trade (COMEX); Customs;
the National Registry; the Judicial School; the Judicial
Investigative Agency; and the Fiscal General. Adriana Chaves, a
prosecutor and a recipient of DOJ IPR training in late 2008,
represented the Fiscal General at the most recent meeting.
----------------------------------
GOALS FOR THE SHORT- AND LONG-TERM
----------------------------------
¶9. (SBU) The goals of our three-point IPR strategy (training,
international collaboration, and private sector support) are A) to
better collaborate with the Costa Rican judiciary in a variety of
ways and B) to produce cases for prosecution by way of private
sector pressure and involvement. Since Supreme Court President Mora
in essence requested training assistance, we will provide it, using
USPTO, DOJ, and even other countries in order to keep IPR issues on
the judiciary's radar screen. Meanwhile, the private sector will
mount a "flanking attack" by introducing cases into the court system
which will be heard by some judges with USPTO and/or DOJ training.
In the long run, i.e. post-2011, when Dall'Anese will likely have
left office, we hope that the USG-provided training and the cases
pushed by the private sector will have changed the "culture of
reluctance" sufficiently so that prosecutors and judges will
understand the importance of IPR enforcement and be more willing to
prosecute cases.
---------------
ONE OTHER LEVER
---------------
¶10. (SBU) The USG retains one other lever, of course, in the form
of the Special 301 Report. With the necessary legislation in place,
2009 will be an interesting trial for Costa Rica's IPR resolve. We
hope that the GOCR will make good use of training and collaboration
opportunities this year.
---------
NOW WHAT?
---------
¶11. (U) In the wake of the Lipman/ Covington visit and the Mexican
DVC, Post has several immediate initiatives to pursue:
-- a DOJ training session for judges at the Judicial School (in
June);
-- a meeting of the private sector alliance to outline a plan for
lobbying and for prosecuting IPR crimes. The lobbying campaign
would press the judiciary to prosecute IPR crimes, and the
legislature to approve the yet-to-be passed, IPR-related 14th
CAFTA-DR bill);
-- continued dialogue with the AG's office to determine what type of
training is appropriate for IPR staff prosecutors;
-- provision of DOJ software -- the Real-Time Analytic Intelligence
Database (RAID) application in Spanish -- to the Judicial
Investigative Agency (OIJ) at no cost (COMMENT: Investigative
analysts and document examiners in law enforcement use RAID to
provide document and evidence intelligence in a distributive
computer network environment. END COMMENT); and
-- Mexican training of IPR staff in the office of the AG.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶12. (SBU) Ultimately, we cannot predict how successful our
three-point strategy may be, but it underscores our commitment to
focus Costa Rican attention on the IPR issue. We position our
argument not only as a CAFTA-DR obligation but also as a fundamental
building block to Costa Rican commerce and the arts since innovation
and creativity are the basic ingredients of a flourishing business
and cultural environment. We welcome any change, no matter how
incremental, on the part of the AG regarding IPR enforcement.
However, we also believe that the most progress can be gained by
working around the AG, marking progress with cooperative partners in
the quest of small victories now, while preparing for what we hope
will be a more dramatic, positive shift in the attitude of the
office of the AG in the future.
CIANCHETTE