

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05TORONTO2638, The Canadian Financial Services Sector:
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05TORONTO2638.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05TORONTO2638 | 2005-10-12 15:52 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Consulate Toronto |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
121552Z Oct 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 TORONTO 002638
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EB A/S TONY WAYNE
STATE FOR WHA/CAN, EB/IFD, INR
STATE FOR WHA DAS WHITAKER
USDOC FOR 3000/ITA U/S RHONDA KEENUM
USDOC FOR 432/ITA/IAA/BASTIAN/RUDMAN/FOX
TREASURY FOR U/S (INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS) TIMOTHY ADAMS
TREASURY FOR U/S (DOMESTIC FINANCE) RANDY QUARLES
DEPT ALSO PASS USTR FOR J. MELLE AND S. CHANDLER
DEPT PASS SEC - (INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS) MARISA LAGO
DEPT PASS FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
DEPT PASS TO IRS COMMISSIONER MARK EVERSON
WHITE HOUSE/NSC - KIM BRIER AND SUE CRONIN
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EINV EFIN PREL CA US
SUBJECT: The Canadian Financial Services Sector:
Playing Catch-Up on the Venture Capital Front
Ref: (A) Toronto 1633 (B) Toronto 1728
Sensitive But Unclassified - Protect accordingly.
¶1. (U) This message is one in a series reviewing the
Canadian financial services sector from a cross-border,
North American integration perspective. In September
2005 the Toronto Financial Services Alliance sponsored
roundtables for ConGen Toronto with industry sector
experts in venture capital, banking (septel),
securities (septel), and insurance (septel).
¶2. (SBU) SUMMARY AND COMMENT: Canada's venture capital
and private equity public policy association, the
Canadian Venture Capital Association (CVCA), advised
ConGen Toronto during a September 13 roundtable that it
has mounted a campaign to increase the supply of risk
capital available to Canadian entrepreneurs. One goal
is to ensure that funds are properly channeled to
support new enterprises that are commercializing
technology coming from Canada's leading university and
research institutions. CVCA is concerned that Canada's
undersized venture capital industry and current
regulatory framework stifle growth opportunities for
Canada (and North America) and fail to take advantage
of Canada's positive economic performance. CVCA cites,
among other things, eight structural impediments to
investment in Canadian venture capital that the federal
government imposes on the industry via the Canada
Income Tax Act. The CVCA expressed frustration that
Canada's strength in publicly-funded university
research is often commercialized in the U.S. due to a
dearth of venture capital in Canada. To address these
issues, the industry hopes to raise its profile in
Canada and the U.S. to attract large institutional and
pension fund investors to Canadian private equity funds
and interest in several emerging homeland security-type
technologies. The Security and Prosperity Partnership
(SPP) Financial Services Sector Working Group may wish
to factor these concerns into its work plan review.
END SUMMARY AND COMMENT.
Boom and Bust - Context of Venture Capital in Canada
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶3. (U) At a September 13 Canadian Venture Capital
Association (CVCA) roundtable for ConGen Toronto,
representatives of the private equity industry
explained that the Canadian venture capital industry
was a late starter compared with the U.S. Tracing its
origins to the mid-1970s when the fledgling industry
established the CVCA, the market only attained "take
off" velocity during the 1990s with the technology
bubble. Over 50 percent of Canada's venture capital
industry is concentrated in Ontario. Major components
of the industry focus on software and the life sciences
in Toronto, telecom and Internet technology in Ottawa,
and biotech and information technology in the "Golden
Horseshoe technology triangle" around Kitchener,
Waterloo, and Guelph. Quebec is the second largest
market due in part to the province's dirigiste
policies, which mandate that venture capital generated
in Quebec must be invested locally. Western Canada's
focus on resources, oil, and gas had not been conducive
to the development of a venture capital industry,
according to the CVCA; however, a small venture capital
industry is developing in Vancouver, closely connected
to the venture capital industry in Seattle.
¶4. (U) In the 1990's, growth was rapid, the CVCA told
us, but when the high-tech bubble burst in late 2000
and early 2001 the descent was equally rapid. Capital
was drained from the industry as venture capitalists
fled the overwhelmingly tech-based venture industry.
Currently, the 1,000 members of the CVCA manage some
C$50 billion in assets. This is about 1/20 of the size
of the U.S. industry and, in relation to population and
GDP, half the size of the U.S. venture capital market.
Cross-Border Integration
------------------------
¶5. (SBU) The CVCA has in recent years observed a trend
towards cross-border integration of the venture capital
industries in the U.S. and Canada. U.S. companies find
certain aspects of the Canadian market attractive -
competition is not as fierce, making returns
significantly higher, and Canada's publicly funded
universities are good incubators of intriguing
technologies. U.S. companies that have recently come
to Canada include KKR, the Carlisle Group, several
Boston-based groups, and some funds from Washington and
New York. Also, Canadian-based venture capitalists
have recently succeeded in raising funds from U.S.
firms. Most prominently, Celtic House, an Ottawa based
group, sourced 50 percent of its funding from the U.S.,
which the industry here saw as a real breakthrough.
Ventures West, a Vancouver-based group, and Jefferson
Capital, based in Toronto, have in recent months
recorded similar successes. The CVCA believes that the
venture capital industry is in the process of becoming
truly continental, with several smaller regional
centers of gravity outside the main Toronto hub.
Digging out from the Tech Collapse
----------------------------------
¶6. (SBU) CVCA described the big picture challenge as
digging out from the tech collapse. This has been a
slow and arduous task, according to the CVCA. In the
best of times, Canadian venture capitalists have
suffered in comparison to their U.S. counterparts from
the relatively small pool of venture capital and the
fact that Canadians tend to be more risk averse than
Americans. The CVCA pointed to the following factors
as slowing the recovery:
--Increased regulatory burden: according to the CVCA,
the ultimate goal of any venture capitalist is to take
fledgling private companies public and to cash in at
the initial public offering (IPO). Following enactment
in the U.S. of the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation and
Canada's coordination with U.S. law (ref (A)), the
costs to companies of complying with beefed-up
disclosure provisions are dissuading small and micro
cap companies from going public (i.e. issuing an IPO).
The CVCA said the industry has, ironically, benefited
to some degree in recent years from taking public
companies private again;
--Loss of Canadian subsidies: The CVCA deplored the
decision of the Ontario government to phase out a 30
percent tax credit previously given to Ontario
residents who invest up to C$5,000 in designated pools
of venture capital;
--Proximity and relative strength of the U.S. market:
the CVCA confirmed that of Canada's best ideas migrate
to the U.S. where venture funding is more readily
available. As a result, Canada faces the "perverse"
situation that its publicly funded university system
acts as a great incubator for innovative ideas that are
then developed commercially south of the border (ref
(B)). A good example is the University of Waterloo, a
leading Canadian math and high-tech engineering
university, which supplies over 50 percent of its
graduating classes to Microsoft Corp. (NOTE: Bill
Gates has taken a personal interest in this university,
often slipping in quietly to meet with Waterloo
students, as he did on October 7. END NOTE)
Canadian Tax Act Impedes Venture Capital Industry
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶7. (SBU) The CVCA reserved its harshest criticism for
the federal government and has identified in a paper
submitted to the federal Department of Finance eight
structural barriers to investment in Canadian venture
capital and private equity funds under the Canadian
Income Tax Act. These problem areas include:
--Impediments to the use of Qualified Limited
Partnerships (QLP), especially with regard to Canadian
content restrictions, as a vehicle for venture capital
and private funds.
--Passive investment as a limited foreign partner in a
Canadian fund being subject to Canadian tax.
Department of Finance letters of exclusion are not, the
CVCA says, a reliable instrument to the general venture
capital investor;
--Lack of tax treaty relief for U.S. LLC ("Limited
Liability Company") partners under the Canada-U.S.
Income Tax Convention, which often prevents a U.S. fund
from investing in Canada. (NOTE: an LLC is a type of
legal entity that combines the benefits of liability
protection for the owners of the business with the
potentially favorable tax benefits of flow through
taxation. END NOTE);
--Cumbersome use of "parallel funds" to protect
Canadian investors from Canadian withholding tax rather
than a look-through mechanism that would require
withholding of taxes only to the proportionate extent
of the non-Canadian interest in the partnership;
--Delay in the issuance of Section 116 certificates
following the completion of a corporate sale
transaction, which has forced U.S. investors to delay
the sale of their resulting shares in public markets.
This has led to a growing perception that Canadian
regulatory requirements do not accommodate market
realities;
--The Non-resident tax return requirement even when no
tax is payable and the transaction has been reported to
the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA);
--Limits posed on "Associated Companies" eligibility
for Scientific Research and Experimental Development
(SR&ED) tax credits under current definitions that do
not recognize genuinely independent associated
companies; and
--Cross border merger provisions that deny a roll-over
for shareholders of Canadian companies that receive
shares of U.S. companies as a result of a merger
transaction (NOTE: This single issue CVCA claims leads
many experienced Canadian entrepreneurs to establish
their new businesses as U.S. incorporated companies,
even though the business is initially being formed in
Canada. END NOTE).
¶8. (SBU) The CVCA emphasized that resolution of all
eight impediments would not/not have any material
fiscal impact on the Government of Canada. In each
case, the identified structural barriers do not
represent requests for lower tax rates or increases in
other tax benefits. The CVCA argued that many of these
impediments take the form of misguided nationalistic
rules, such as "Canadian content" provisions, which
scare away foreign investors. The CVCA also claimed
that many of these eight structural impediments have
been previously discussed with the federal Finance
Ministry but, so far, have at best been only partially
addressed in legislative amendments. The CVCA hoped the
federal government would eventually remove these eight
impediments to investment in Canadian venture capital
(NOTE: The CVCA Paper "Summary of Tax Issues for
Discussion with the Department of Finance" has been
sent to WHA/CAN and Embassy Ottawa. END NOTE).
Planned Remedies
----------------
¶9. (SBU) The CVCA believes that its overarching goal
must be to grow the pool of venture capital in Canada.
To do so, the CVCA plans several measures, including:
--Campaigns to market itself better in Canada. Many
small investors, the CVCA believes, are not aware or
have a poor understanding of private equity funds.
Roynat Capital, a venture company that hosted this
roundtable discussion, is currently running full-page
ads in the "Financial Post" (the business section of
the National Post), featuring several venture capital
success stories.
--The CVCA hopes to prod large pension funds of large
institutional investors in the NAFTA area to take a new
look at venture capital and invest more money in the
industry. Among the targets is the Ontario Teacher's
Pension Fund, Canada's largest pension fund. The CVCA
mentioned the federal elimination of the 30% foreign
property ceiling on Canadian pension funds in February
2005, as a recent positive development for the
increasingly continental venture capital industry. In
particular, pension funds have found it difficult to
invest in venture capital pools, in which the domestic-
to-foreign content ratio can fluctuate significantly.
--The CVCA believes that Canada is currently incubating
several technologies with homeland security
applications that would be of interest to both the
Canadian and U.S. governments. They noted that U.S.
Department of Defense contract awards to Canadian
companies are almost twice as large as the defense
contracts going to U.K. companies.
--The CVCA points to two favorable market trends that
could lift the Canadian venture capital market. First,
recent quarterly data - which are notoriously volatile
- show a 50% jump in investment in Canadian venture
capital pools, with 35% coming from outside of Canada
(mostly from the U.S.). This investment from foreign
sources was at its highest level in two years. Second,
the federal government's September decision to all but
freeze "income trust conversion" (a highly popular
investment vehicle) is already increasing the flow of
capital to the traditional IPO market.
Positive Government Initiatives
-------------------------------
¶10. (SBU) In addition to these CVCA efforts, the
industry hopes provincial and federal government
initiatives will help the industry recover. For
example, Ontario is supporting Centers of Excellence,
which provide seed money to encourage commercialization
of home-grown technologies in the areas of Energy,
Communications & Information Technology, Public
Infrastructure, Materials and Manufacturing, and
Photonics Research. Also, the federal and provincial
governments have partnered in establishing a Medical
And Related Sciences (MARs) hub in Toronto, an attempt
to turn medical research into commercially viable
hospital applications. And on October 7 the Toronto
Region Research Alliance (TRRA) was launched to
implement a focused strategy to commercialize R&D in
the Greater Toronto Area. Using San Diego as one model
that has attracted a large number of venture capital
firms, this new alliance has brought together the
formidable talents of its founders Dr John Evans,
president of MARs, former president of the University
of Toronto and now Chair of the Board of Directors of
the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI); Gordon
Nixon President and CEO of RBC Financial Group,
Canada's largest bank; David Pecaut, Managing Director
of the Boston Consulting Group of Canada; and Ross
McGregor, Chairman Emeritus of Ketchum Canada, Canada's
leading fund development consultancy. This group hopes
to bring the U.S.-based Battelle Institute to partner
with the University of Toronto to create a world-class
bio-tech commercialization facility and to establish a
National Research Council presence in southern Ontario.
List of Attendees
-----------------
¶11. (U) The venture capital industry was represented
Dr. Robin Louis, President of CVCA and President of
Ventures West Management; Richard Remillard, the CVCA's
Executive Director; Bob Roy, Managing Director, Roynat
Capital; Rick Nathan, Managing Director, Goodmans
Venture Capital; Mark MacDonald, Buyout Specialist,
OTPP Private Equity; and Arlene O'Neil, M&A Lawyer,
Gardiner Roberts LLP. The Toronto Financial Services
Alliance was represented by its President, Janet Ecker
(former Ontario Minister Finance); and Susan Viegas,
Economic Development, City of Toronto. The U.S. was
represented by CG Jessica LeCroy; Consul for
Economic/Political Affair Sherri Holliday; and Economic
Specialist Colin White.
Background: the CVCA and the TFSA
---------------------------------
¶12. (U) The CVCA - Canada's Venture Capital & Private
Equity Association - was founded in 1974 to represent
Canada's venture capital and private equity industry.
Its over 1,000 members are firms and organizations that
manage the majority of Canada's pools of capital
designated to be committed to venture capital and
private equity investments. The CVCA fosters
professional development, networking, communication,
research and education within the venture capital and
private equity sector and represents the industry in
tax and regulatory matters.
¶13. (U) The Toronto Financial Services Alliance (TFSA)
is a joint public-private partnership created in 2002
by the City of Toronto's Economic Development Bureau
and the Toronto-based financial services industry. The
TFSA works closely with industry, affiliate services,
and government to enhance and promote the
competitiveness of Toronto as a premier North American
financial center.
LECROY