

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 03OTTAWA1924, SCENE-SETTER FOR TRI- AND BILATERAL ENERGY MEETINGS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03OTTAWA1924.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
03OTTAWA1924 | 2003-07-09 13:53 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 OTTAWA 001924
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EB/ESC/ISC (MCMANUS AND DUDLEY), WHA/CAN
(RUNNING), OES/EGC (REIFSNYDER AND DEROSA)
USDOC FOR ITA/MAC -- OFFICE OF NAFTA
DOE FOR IA (A/S BAILEY, DAS DOBRIANSKY, PUMPHREY AND
DEUTSCH)
DEPT PASS USTR FOR MELLE AND CHANDLER
DEPT PASS INTERIOR FOR INT'L AFFAIRS
DEPT PASS FERC FOR KEVIN KELLY AND DONALD LEKANG
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG ETRD CA
SUBJECT: SCENE-SETTER FOR TRI- AND BILATERAL ENERGY MEETINGS
REF: (A) Ottawa 1812 (Uranium)
(B) Ottawa 1721 (Hydrogen Economy Partnership)
(C) Ottawa 1578 (NOAA Administrator's visit)
(D) Ottawa 687 (GOC climate change measures)
(E) Ottawa 566 (2002 energy trade data)
(F) Ottawa 503 (Natural gas in North America)
(G) Ottawa 334 (Protecting oil/gas pipelines)
(H) Halifax 52 (Atlantic offshore outlook)
(J) Calgary 44 (Alberta electric restructuring)
(K) 02 Vancouver 1153 (BC energy policy)
(L) 02 Calgary 473 (Alberta and Kyoto)
(M) 02 Ottawa 3205 (Atlantic offshore overview)
(N) 02 Ottawa 2474 (Power transmission barriers)
SUBJECT PARAS
CANADA ENERGY OVERVIEW 3 - 9
PARTNERSHIP FOR THE HYDROGEN ECONOMY 10
SHIFTING TO OILSANDS AND FRONTIERS 11 - 15
OILSANDS: CONTINUING EXPANSION 16 - 19
ARCTIC PIPELINES: APPROACHING REALITY 20 - 21
ELECTRICITY: ONTARIO RESTRUCTURING SKIDS 22 - 25
NUCLEAR: MOVING TOWARD LONG-TERM DISPOSAL 26
CLIMATE CHANGE 27 - 28
¶1. THIS MESSAGE IS SENSITIVE, BUT UNCLASSIFIED. NOT
FOR DISTRIBUTION OUTSIDE USG CHANNELS.
¶2. In preparation for the forthcoming meetings of the
North American Energy Working Group (NAEWG) and U.S.-
Canada Energy Consultative Mechanism (ECM) in Ottawa
July 15-17, post provides the following updated
overview of the very dynamic Canadian energy scene.
CANADIAN ENERGY OVERVIEW
------------------------
¶3. Since the early 1980's, Canada has been the single
largest foreign supplier of energy to the United
States; measured in total energy, it is our number one
energy supplier by a wide margin. Canada is the
world's fifth largest energy producer and a net
exporter of all major energy products including oil and
petroleum products, natural gas, electric power,
uranium, and energy technology and services. The
United States is virtually Canada's sole customer for
crude oil and natural gas exports, which grew steeply
over the past decade and a half, as well as its sole
customer for exports of electric power.
¶4. Canadian and U.S. government efforts are coordinated
across the full range of energy-related technologies
including climate monitoring, carbon sequestration,
clean coal, hydrogen and nuclear. Canada has been
invited to participate in the Carbon Sequestration
Leadership Forum (CSLF) and the International
Partnership for the Hydrogen Economy (IPHE).
¶5. OIL: Canada supplies more oil and oil products to
Americans than any other country, including Saudi
Arabia. In 2002 Canada exported approximately 1.4
million barrels per day of crude oil, plus the
equivalent of about 500,000 barrels per day in
petroleum products and partially processed oil. In
2002, imports of Canadian oil and petroleum products
accounted for about about 17 percent of U.S. oil
imports and nearly 10 percent of total U.S. oil demand.
¶6. GAS: Natural gas makes up the largest part - more
than one-third - of Canada's primary energy production.
In 2002 Canada exported 3.74 trillion cubic feet of
natural gas, making up 93 percent of U.S. gas imports
and 18 percent of total U.S. gas demand. (See ref F
for a Canadian perspective on North American gas supply
issues).
¶7. ELECTRIC POWER: Canada exported about 35 terawatt-
hours of electric power to the United States in 2002.
Canada's total electricity exports peaked in 2000 and
are now on a declining trend, due to changes in demand
patterns, a lack of capital investment in both the U.S.
and Canadian electric power industries and the
difficulty of building new transmission capacity (see
ref N for analysis).
¶8. NUCLEAR: Canada is the world's largest uranium
producer (ref A), supplying about one-third of world
production and 20 to 30 percent of U.S. demand. A
Canadian Government-owned firm, AECL, is one of the
world's most active vendors of nuclear reactors, having
supplied units to China and South Korea in the past
decade.
¶9. For further data on Canadian energy production and
trade, refer to the EIA's Country Analysis Brief on
Canada (www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/canada.html), or the
GOC's National Energy Board website (www.neb.gc.ca).
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR THE HYDROGEN ECONOMY
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶10. Canada has been invited to participate in the IPHE.
Working-level GOC officials appear to be cautiously
interested, but have significant concerns about how IPHE
will relate to the IEA's Hydrogen Coordination Group (ref
B). They also have numerous questions about IPHE's possible
structure and process.
SHIFTING TO OILSANDS AND FRONTIERS
----------------------------------
¶11. Canada's conventional oil and gas fields are mainly
located in or adjacent to the western province of
Alberta, which is north of Montana. While the cost of
finding new reserves in this region has risen
significantly in recent years, the industry continues
to thrive, notably in the less-exploited northwestern
portion of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin which
extends into the neighboring province of British
Columbia. A relatively new energy/mining technology,
the extraction of oil from oilsands (vast deposits of
oily dirt) in northern Alberta, became profitable
during the 1990's. Multi-billion-dollar investments
are ongoing in that industry. See paragraphs 16-19
below for details.
¶12. The ability of supplies to keep up with North
America's natural gas demand has been the subject of
recent controversy in Canada, as it has in the United
States. There is now broad, well-developed support
among stakeholders to construct a pipeline down the
Mackenzie River Valley, which would allow development
of natural gas fields in the Mackenzie River Delta and
Beaufort Sea areas (east of Alaska's North Slope). The
first formal steps toward applying for regulatory
approval for such a pipeline are expected to be taken
in the second half of 2003. While the amount of gas
which will be accessed by this pipeline is a fraction
as large as that in Prudhoe Bay, the barriers to
pipeline development are lower, and the gas could begin
to reach southern markets around 2010.
¶13. Substantial oil and gas deposits under the
continental shelf off Canada's Atlantic coast entered
commercial production in the past decade, highlighted
by the placement of a large fixed platform on the
"Hibernia" oilfield (east of Newfoundland) in 1997, and
the inauguration of natural gas exports from Nova
Scotia to New England through the Maritimes and
Northeast Pipeline early in 2000.
¶14. The Hibernia oilfield, which is being exploited by
a consortium of private oil firms (Exxon/Mobil is the
operator), is estimated to contain more than 600
million barrels of oil. Major oil firms are now
beginning production from the nearby "Terra Nova"
oilfield, which has reserves of about 300-400 million
barrels. Conservative estimates put East Coast
discovered reserves of oil in the two billion barrels
range, with possible eventual production rates of up to
one million barrels per day.
¶15. Offshore natural gas production from the Sable
Island area, east of Nova Scotia, began early in 2000.
Most of this gas is exported to New England - bringing
large-scale natural gas service to these states for the
first time, and helping to stabilize their winter
heating costs. Gas reserves around Sable Island have
been estimated at 3.5 trillion cubic feet, but more
drilling is needed to complete this picture (ref H).
There are much larger gas resources in Newfoundland and
Labrador, but environmental and distance problems will
slow these developments.
OILSANDS: CONTINUING EXPANSION
-------------------------------
¶16. The economically recoverable oil resources in
Alberta's oilsands are many times larger than the sum
of Canada's other oil reserves. Oilsands (aka
"tarsands" or "heavy oil") are vast deposits of oily
dirt which can be processed (economically at current
oil prices) into "synthetic crude" which can then be
refined in conventional oil refineries. Canadian
authorities estimate reserves in the oilsands to be the
equivalent of 175 billion barrels assuming current
technology and economic conditions, and up to 315
billion barrels with technological advances and some
price increases. Oilsands already account for more
than half of Canada's crude oil output, and for most of
the recent increases in Canada's production.
¶17. Crude bitumen production from oilsands increased by
about 25 percent in 2002, due to large ongoing capital
investments. The Canadian government has predicted
that if currently planned projects are realized, by
2010 Canada will provide approximately 20.5 percent of
U.S. oil imports and 14.1 percent of total U.S. oil
supply. The Alberta Energy and Utilities Board
projects that synthetic crude oil production from
Alberta's oilsands will expand by 237 percent from 2002
to 2012.
¶18. During the past year, first Oil and Gas Journal and
subsequently the U.S. Energy Information Administration
began to recognize Canada's oil sands as "proven
reserves" -- a decision which dramatically increases
Canada's petroleum reserves on paper, to about 180
billion barrels, making Canada the world's second-
largest reserve holder after Saudi Arabia. While the
validity of counting the oilsands as "proven reserves"
has been subject to some ongoing controversy (notably
following a critical item by Jeff Gerth in the New York
Times on June 18), their economic reality is affirmed
by the many billions in actual capital investment which
they are attracting and the resulting current increases
in oil output.
¶19. COMMENT: There is growing confidence among
Canadian stakeholders and analysts that this resource
imposes an effective limit on the price which North
America must pay for overseas oil in the long run,
absent severe foreign supply disruptions. Embassy
shares this view. END COMMENT.
ARCTIC PIPELINES: MACKENZIE LINE CLOSER TO REALITY
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶20. IN RECENT MONTHS, STAKEHOLDERS IN AN ANTICIPATED NATURAL
GAS PIPELINE DOWN THE MACKENZIE RIVER VALLEY IN NORTHWESTERN
CANADA HAVE TAKEN FURTHER STEPS TO PAVE THE ROAD FOR A
FORMAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. TRANSCANADA PIPELINES (TCPL),
ONE OF THE WORLD'S LARGEST PIPELINE OPERATORS, SIGNED A DEAL
IN JUNE TO PROVIDE FINANCING TO ABORIGINAL PIPELINE GROUP
(APG), ENABLING APG TO TAKE A ONE-THIRD OWNERSHIP SHARE IN
THE PIPELINE. THE MAIN PRODUCING PARTNER IS IMPERIAL OIL,
THE CANADIAN SUBSIDIARY OF EXXON. AN INITIAL APPLICATION TO
REGULATORS IS EXPECTED IN THE FALL OF 2003.
¶21. STAKEHOLDERS LESS AND LESS VIEW THE MACKENZIE LINE AND
ANOTHER, LARGER PIPELINE TO ALASKA'S PRUDHOE BAY AS BEING
INCOMPATIBLE. THIS IS BECAUSE IT APPEARS INCREASINGLY
LIKELY THAT THE SMALLER AND SHORTER MACKENZIE LINE WILL BE
CONSTRUCTED FIRST, AND BECAUSE THERE IS INCREASING CONCERN
THAT NORTH AMERICA'S DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS MAY OUTSTRIP
SUPPLIES OVER THE COMING DECADE (REF F). CANADIAN
OBJECTIONS TO POSSIBLE FISCAL INCENTIVES TO SUPPORT THE
ALASKA PIPELINE FOCUS ON THE POSSIBLE MARKET-DISTORTING
EFFECTS OF SUCH SUBSIDIES - PARTICULARLY IF THEY GO BEYOND
THE SCOPE OF MEASURES TAKEN TO ENCOURAGE INVESTMENT IN OTHER
GAS PRODUCING REGIONS.
ELECTRICITY: RESTRUCTURING SKIDS IN ONTARIO
--------------------------------------------
¶22. Electric power is primarily under provincial
jurisdiction in Canada, and is traditionally dominated by
provincial government-owned firms. Several provinces have
taken steps to restructure their electricity sectors on
competitive principles. Alberta has achieved a degree of
competition at both wholesale and retail levels which has
been characterized as a "messy success" (ref J).
¶23. In Ontario in recent years, the provincial monopoly
utility was split up into generation, transmission and
distribution components, and some competition was introduced
at the retail level. However, in April 2002 a planned
initial public offering of the provincial government-owned
transmission grid operator, Hydro One, was blocked by a
court ruling. Transmission grid issues quickly became
politicized, particularly when power prices rose during the
peak summer period. In November 2002, the Ontario
government froze retail power rates at 4.3 cents/KWH for
most customers until 2006. Since then, the government has
struggled to increase generating capacity with little help
from private investment. Re-starting mothballed nuclear
plants is crucial to its survival strategy, but the first re-
starts - expected this summer and fall - have been delayed.
¶24. Canada's National Energy Board (NEB) predicts that
domestic electricity demand will grow slightly faster than
supply through 2025, causing electricity exports to the
United States to decline significantly from current levels
in the long run. This is driven by the trend for generating
facilities to be located closer to end users. One major
reason for this is the difficulty of constructing new
transmission capacity due to a range of concerns including
environmental/agricultural opposition, regulatory hurdles,
and uncertainty associated with the evolving market
environment for electric power. Another is the growing
availability of natural gas and the efficiency of gas-driven
generating technology.
¶25. Canada still has abundant undeveloped hydroelectric
potential, but these resources tend to be located far from
densely populated markets. Provinces with large undeveloped
sites include Newfoundland and Labrador (Churchill Falls
II), Quebec (Great Whale) and Manitoba (Nelson River).
There is significant potential for cogeneration of electric
power in oilsands operations, but here as well, it will be
difficult for the resulting power to reach major markets
unless construction of long-distance power lines becomes
easier.
NUCLEAR: MOVING FORWARD ON LONG-TERM DISPOSAL
--------------------------------------------- -
¶26. Like the United States, Canada has no permanent disposal
facility for its nuclear waste, which is currently stored at
reactor sites. As in the U.S., proposals to move this waste
to any other site(s) provoke strong local resistance.
During 2002, Canada passed legislation which creates a Waste
Management Organization, funded by nuclear energy firms, to
develop a long-term approach to storing radioactive waste.
The GOC plans to make a decision by 2006 in favor of one of
the three major options (deep geological storage,
centralized surface/subsurface, or continued storage at
reactor sites).
CLIMATE CHANGE
--------------
¶27. In the spring of 2002 the USG and GOC announced a more
concerted effort to coordinate our climate change programs,
with a particular focus on energy, especially energy
efficiency, clean energy, clean coal, renewable and
alternative energy and carbon sequestration. At Prime
Minister Chretien's initiative, Canada formally ratified the
Kyoto Accord at the end of 2002, despite vocal criticism
from provincial governments and industries (with Alberta and
the oil and gas sector leading the way - ref L). Critics
were concerned that the burden of compliance would fall
disproportionately on certain regions/industries and also
that compliance would place Canada's economy at a lasting
competitive disadvantage vis--vis the United States.
¶28. In its spring 2003 budget, the GOC committed C$1.5
billion (about US$1 billion) over five years directly to
achieving greenhouse gas emission reductions, plus modest
additional funds for research and long-term technology
development. GOC officials are now engaged in determining
what process will be used to allocate this spending.
CELLUCCI