

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 04QUITO3289, ECUADOR 2005 NATIONAL TRADE ESTIMATE REPORT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04QUITO3289.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
04QUITO3289 | 2004-12-23 19:53 | 2011-05-02 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Quito |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 QUITO 003289
SIPDIS
FOR USTR G. BLUE AND BENNETT HARMAN AND FOR STATE EB/MTA/MST
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON EFIN EC
SUBJECT: ECUADOR 2005 NATIONAL TRADE ESTIMATE REPORT
SUBMISSION
REF: STATE 240980
¶1. Below is Embassy Quito's submission for the 2005 National
Trade Estimate Report. A copy of the report has been
provided to USTR Bennett Harman via email. The report was a
collaborative effort between State, the Commercial Service
and the Foreign Agricultural Service.
TRADE SUMMARY
-------------
According to US Bureau of Census statistics, the United
States, trade deficit with Ecuador was $1.3 billion in 2003
(agricultural trade accounted for $850 million of the
deficit). That was an increase of $762 million from the $538
million deficit in 2002. U.S. goods exports in 2003 were
$1.4 billion, down 9.9 percent from the previous year ($1.6
billion). Corresponding U.S. imports from Ecuador in 2003
were $2.7 billion, up 27 percent. U.S. agricultural imports
from Ecuador in 2003 were $1.09 billion, a 4% increase from
2002 ($970 million). Ecuador is currently the 51st largest
export market for U.S. goods.
Ecuadorian Central Bank statistics estimate the stock of
foreign direct investment (FDI) in Ecuador in 2003 was $1.5
billion. U.S. FDI in Ecuador in 2003 is estimated at $204
million, primarily in the oil sector.
Free Trade Area Negotiations
----------------------------
In November 2003, the United States announced its intention
to begin free trade negotiations with Colombia, Peru, Ecuador
and Bolivia, the four Andean Trade Preference Act beneficiary
countries. The negotiations began on May 18, 2004 with
Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. The Andeans collectively
represent a market of about $7.1 billion for U.S. exports in
2003, and are home to about $4.2 billion in U.S. FDI. The
negotiation will complement the goal of completing a Free
Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA).
IMPORT POLICIES
---------------
¶A. Tariffs
When Ecuador joined the WTO in January 1996, it bound most of
its tariff rates at 30 percent or less. Ecuador's average
applied tariff rate is 13 percent. Ecuador applies a
four-tiered structure with levels of five percent for most
raw materials and capital goods, 10 percent or 15 percent for
intermediate goods, and 20 percent for most consumer goods.
A small number of products, including planting seeds, are
subject to a tariff rate of zero. Some agricultural products
(193), most of which are chemicals and veterinary products,
are imported duty free.
As a member of the Andean Community of Nations (CAN), Ecuador
grants and receives exemptions on tariffs (e.g., reduced ad
valorem tariffs and no application of the Andean Price Band
System) for products from the CAN countries (Bolivia,
Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela). Currently, these
countries have an Andean Free Trade Zone and apply Common
External Tariffs (CET), as stated in CAN Decision 370. There
is a proposal for a new CET, with a three-tiered structure,
with levels of 5, 10 and 20 percent tariffs for agricultural
products. The proposed structure has not been approved by
the CAN.
Ecuador maintains the Andean Price Band System (APBS) on 153
agricultural products (13 &marker8 and 140 &linked8
products) imported from outside the CAN. The 13 &marker8
products are wheat, rice, sugar, barley, white and yellow
corn, soybean, soybean meal, African palm oil, soy oil,
chicken meat, pork meat and powder milk. Under this system,
the ad valorem CET are adjusted (increased or reduced)
according to the relationship between international reference
prices, established floor and ceiling prices and the
importation price of the commodity. Upon accession to the
WTO, Ecuador bound its ad valorem tariffs (including the
additional levy from the APBS) for these commodities between
31.5 and 85.5%.
As part of its WTO accession, Ecuador committed to phase out
its WTO-authorized price band system, starting in January
1996 with a total phase out by December 2001. No steps have
been taken to comply with this commitment. Instead, Ecuador
adopted the APBS, which applies the reduced CET to the CAN
and increased tariffs to other WTO members. This decision
did not comply with Ecuador,s commitments to the WTO.
However, Ecuador maintains that, as the highest rate under
the APBS us beneath the bound tariff rate, Ecuador,s
participation in the APBS is WTO-consistent.
¶B. Non-Tariff Measures
Ecuador has failed to eliminate several non-tariff barriers
since its WTO accession. Importers must register with the
Central Bank, through approved banking institutions to obtain
an import license. In order to get this license, an importer
must first obtain, inter alia, a tax registration number from
Ecuador,s Internal Revenue Service (SRI). Ecuador requires
prior authorization from various government agencies, e.g.,
the Ministry of Agriculture (MAG) for importation of most
commodities, seeds, animals, and plants. Also, the Ministry
of Health must give its prior authorization (i.e., sanitary
registration) before the importation of processed, canned,
and packed foods as well as food ingredients and beverages,
cosmetics and pharmaceutical products. Another
administrative hurdle agricultural importers must overcome is
the MAG,s use of &Consultative Committees8 (Committees).
The Committees, mainly composed of local producers, often
advise the MAG against granting import permits to foreign
suppliers. The MAG often requires that all local production
be purchased at high prices before authorizing imports.
Ecuador also continues to maintain a preshipment inspection
(PSI) regime. Preshipment inspection by an authorized
inspection company (both before shipment and after specific
export documentation has been completed at the intended
destination) results in delays far exceeding the time saved
in customs clearance. Customs authorities sometimes perform
spot-checks, causing further delays. These practices
generally add six to eight weeks to shipping times. The
following imports are exempt from verification: imports below
FOB $4000, arms and defense materials, newspapers and printed
material, traveler,s personal effects, donation to the
public sector, imports by diplomatic missions, imports by the
public sector that are financed by international loans,
imports of gas, fuel, equipment made by the state oil
company, imports destined for temporary entry, coffins and
samples with no commercial value.
Ecuador maintains bans on the import of used motor vehicles,
tires, and clothing. Ecuador applies a 27 percent markup on
imported distilled spirits for excise tax purposes. As
excise taxes on imports are calculated on CIF value plus
import duties, the effective rate is higher for imports than
domestic products. Ecuador has not equalized the application
of excise taxes between imported and domestic products.
In December 1999, the MAG, through the Ecuadorian Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (SESA), issued a requirement
that all importers must present a certificate stating that
imported agricultural products (plants, animals, their
products or byproducts) have not been produced using modern
biotechnology. In November 2002, the President issued
Executive Decree 3399 creating the National Commission for
Biosafety as an office of the Ministry of Environment. It
will be responsible for biotechnology-related products and
regulations issues. However, no rules have yet been enacted.
STANDARDS, TESTING, LABELING AND CERTIFICATION
--------------------------------------------- -
National standards are set by the Ecuadorian Norms Institute
(INEN) of the Ministry of Commerce and generally follow
international standards. SESA (an agency of the Ministry of
Agriculture) is responsible for administering Ecuador's
sanitary and phytosanitary controls. According to Ecuadorian
importers, bureaucratic procedures required to obtain
clearance still appear to discriminate against foreign
products. Ecuador must comply with the WTO Agreement on the
Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures, yet
denials of SPS certification often appear to lack a
scientific basis and to have been used in a discriminatory
fashion to block the import of U.S. products that compete
with Ecuadorian production. This occurs most often with
poultry, turkey and pork meats, beef, dairy products and
fresh fruit. The ability to import some products, such as
rice, corn, soybeans, and soybean meal depends entirely on
the discretion of the MAG, which will often look to the
Consultative Committees for direction.
SESA follows the &Andean Sanitary Standards8 established
under the Andean Community of Nations (CAN). Some standards
applicable for third countries are different from those
applied to CAN members. For example, there can be
differences in the requirements for CAN and third countries
for the importation of live animals, animal products, and
plants and plant by-products. SESA also requires
certifications for each product stating that the product
complies with risk analysis and that the country of origin or
the area of production is free from certain exotic plant or
animal diseases.
Sanitary registrations are required for imported as well as
domestic processed food, cosmetics, pesticides,
pharmaceuticals, and syringes, as well as some other consumer
goods. However, in a side agreement to its WTO Accession
Agreement, Ecuador committed to accept the U.S. Certificate
of Free Sale authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration, instead of the Government of Ecuador,s
Sanitary Registration. In August 2000, the Government of
Ecuador passed a law (Ley de Promocion Social y Participacion
Ciudadana, Segunda Parte ) also known as Troley II) followed
by application rules issued in June 2001 to reform the
issuance of sanitary permits for food products. This is a
step towards modernizing the issuance of sanitary
registrations with new regulations that allow the acceptance
of free sale certificates, require that the government issue
sanitary permits within 30 days of the receipt of the
request, and reduce the number of documents required to
obtain a permit. However, these regulations are not being
applied consistently. U.S. firms report that the Izquieta
Perez National Hygiene Institute (INHIP - the agency
responsible for registering imported processed food products)
office in Guayaquil has refused to accept U.S. Certificates
of Free Sale and continues to apply the old regime for
sanitary permits. In addition, non-transparent bureaucratic
procedures and inefficiency have delayed issuance beyond 30
days and in some cases blocked the entry of some imported
products from the United States.
U.S. companies have expressed concerns regarding regulations
issued by Ecuador,s public health ministry requiring foreign
food manufacturers to disclose confidential information such
as formulas of imported food and pharmaceutical products.
This requirement appears to go beyond the requirements of the
Codex Alimentarius Commission on Internationals Standards and
Labeling.
GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT
----------------------
Government procurement is regulated by the 1990 public
contracting law. Foreign bidders must be legally represented
in Ecuador. There is no legal requirement to discriminate
against U.S. or other foreign suppliers. Bidding for
government contracts can be cumbersome and insufficiently
transparent. Ecuador is not a signatory to the WTO Agreement
on Government Procurement.
EXPORT SUBSIDIES
----------------
Ecuador has created a semi-independent agency, the
Corporation for the Promotion of Exports and Investments
(Corpei), to promote Ecuadorian exports. Using a European
Union loan, Corpei offers matching grants to exporters to
help fund certain expenses, including international
promotional events and export certifications. The individual
grant amount varies according to the project.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) PROTECTION
---------------------------------------------
In 1998, Ecuador enacted a comprehensive law that
significantly improved the legal basis for protecting
intellectual property, including patents, trademarks, and
copyrights. The intellectual property law provides greater
protection for intellectual property; however, it is
deficient in a number of areas and the law is not being
adequately enforced. Enforcement of copyrights remains a
significant problem, especially concerning sound recordings,
computer software, and motion pictures.
Ecuador's current intellectual property regime is provided
for under its intellectual property rights (IPR) law and
Andean Pact Decisions 486, 345, and 351. Ecuador is a member
of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and is
a member of the WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO
Performances and Phonograms Treaty. Furthermore, Ecuador has
ratified the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary
and Artistic Works, the Geneva Phonograms Convention, the
Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property,
and the WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty.
¶A. Copyrights
The Government of Ecuador, through the National Copyright
Office,s Strategic Plan against Piracy, has committed to
take action to reduce the levels of copyright piracy,
including implementation and enforcement of its 1998
Copyright Law. Article 78 of the 1999 Law on Higher
Education appears to permit software copyright violations by
educational institutions.
¶B. Patents and Trademarks
Ecuador's 1998 IPR law provided an improved legal basis for
protecting patents, trademarks, and trade secrets. However,
concerns remain regarding several provisions, including a
working requirement for patents, compulsory licensing, and
the lack of enforcement in the protection of test data.
Government of Ecuador health authorities continued to approve
the commercialization of new drugs which were the
bioequivalents of already approved drugs, thereby denying the
originator companies the exclusive use of their data. In
effect, the Government of Ecuador is allowing the test data
of registered drugs from originator companies to be used by
others seeking approval for their own pirate version of the
same product. Also, U.S. companies are concerned that the
Government of Ecuador is implementing a policy that a company
that had patented a compound for one use cannot subsequently
patent a second use of that compound. This puts Ecuador at
odds with international norms.
¶C. Enforcement
There continues to be an active local trade in pirated audio
and video recordings, computer software, and counterfeit
brand name apparel. The International Intellectual Property
Alliance estimates that piracy levels in Ecuador for both
motion pictures and recorded music has reached 95 percent,
with estimated damage due to music piracy of $50-60 million.
At times, judges in IPR cases, before issuing a preliminary
injunction, demand a guaranty and evidentiary requirements
that exceed legal requirements and in effect limit the
ability of rights holders to enforce their rights. The
national police and the customs service are responsible for
carrying out IPR enforcement but do not always enforce court
orders. Some local pharmaceutical companies produce or
import pirated drugs and have sought to block improvements in
patent protection. U.S. industry estimates damage due to the
failure to provide data exclusivity is at least $5 million.
SERVICES BARRIERS
-----------------
Ecuador has ratified the WTO Agreement on Financial Services.
The 1993 Equity Markets Law and the 1994 General Financial
Institutions Law significantly opened markets in financial
services and provided for national treatment. Foreign
professionals are subject to national licensing legislation,
and the Superintendent of Banks must certify accountants.
In the area of basic telecommunications, Ecuador only
subscribed to WTO commitments for domestic cellular services.
It did not make market access or national treatment
commitments for a range of other domestic and international
telecommunications services, such as voice telephony and
data. In addition, Ecuador did not adhere to the
pro-competitive regulatory commitments of the WTO Reference
Paper. Several U.S. telecommunications companies have had
their international circuits disconnected without proper
notice of alleged infractions. The Government has also used
Ecuadorian courts to delay implementation of an arbitral
award in favor of a U.S. company.
INVESTMENT BARRIERS
-------------------
Ecuador's foreign investment policy is governed largely by
the national implementing legislation for Andean Pact
Decisions 291 of 1991 and 292 of 1993. Foreign investors are
accorded the same rights of establishment as Ecuadorian
private investors, may own up to 100 percent of enterprises
in most sectors without prior government approval, and face
the same tax regime. There are no controls or limits on
transfers of profits or capital. The U.S.-Ecuador Bilateral
Investment Treaty (BIT) entered into force in May 1997 and
includes guarantees regarding national and
most-favored-nation treatment, prompt, adequate and effective
compensation for expropriation, freedom to make financial
transfers, and access to international arbitration. U.S.
companies are sometimes reluctant to resolve commercial
disputes through the Ecuadorian legal system, fearing a
prolonged process and a lack of impartiality.
Certain sectors of Ecuador's economy are reserved to the
state. All foreign investment in petroleum exploration and
development in Ecuador must be carried out under contract
with the state oil company. U.S. and other foreign oil
companies produce oil in Ecuador under such contracts.
Several of these companies are involved in a dispute with the
government of Ecuador regarding the refund of value-added tax
rebates. In 2004, one U.S. company won a $75 million
international arbitration award against the government of
Ecuador regarding this dispute. The Government has requested
a judicial review of the arbitration award. After notice of
the award, Ecuador,s Solicitor General (Procurador General)
initiated an investigation of the company and has since
advocated the nullification of the company,s contract and
seizure of the company,s considerable assets in Ecuador.
Foreign investment in domestic fishing operations, with
exceptions, is limited to 49 percent of equity. Foreign
companies cannot own more than 25 percent equity in broadcast
stations. Foreigners are prohibited from owning land on the
frontier or coast.
Appropriate compensation for expropriation is provided for in
Ecuadorian law but is often difficult to obtain. The extent
to which foreign and domestic investors receive prompt,
adequate, and effective compensation varies widely. It can
be difficult to enforce property and concession rights,
particularly in the agriculture, oil and mining sectors.
Foreign oil, energy, and telecommunications companies, among
others, have often had difficulties resolving contract issues
with state or local partners. Several U.S. companies have
also raised concerns about the lack of transparency,
predictability, and stability in Ecuador,s legal and
regulatory regime, which increases the risks and adds to the
cost of doing business in Ecuador.
ELECTRONIC COMMERCE
-------------------
Ecuador passed an electronic commerce law in April 2002 that
makes the use of electronic signatures in business
transactions on the Internet legally binding and makes
digital theft a crime. Ecuador has initiated a program for
e-government services and universal access to information
technology through funding from international financial
institutions.
KENNEY