

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08BUENOSAIRES1580, ARGENTINA: SUPREME COURT RULING OPENS THE DOOR FOR TRADE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08BUENOSAIRES1580.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08BUENOSAIRES1580 | 2008-11-19 19:39 | 2011-03-15 07:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Buenos Aires |
Appears in these articles: http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1357489-elogios-por-un-fallo-de-la-corte |
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHBU #1580/01 3241939
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 191939Z NOV 08
FM AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2500
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHINGTON DC
RUCNMER/MERCOSUR COLLECTIVE
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0737
UNCLAS BUENOS AIRES 001580
USDOL FOR TMCCARTER
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ELAB PGOV AR
SUBJECT: ARGENTINA: SUPREME COURT RULING OPENS THE DOOR FOR TRADE
UNION COMPETITION
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: The Argentine Supreme Court declared Article 41 of
the Trade Unions Law unconstitutional and upheld the right of a
workers' union that lacks official legal recognition to elect its
own delegates. The ruling, if widely applied to organized labor,
would expand representation rights to any labor delegate affiliated
with unions simply registered with the Labor Ministry (MOL). This
could potentially increase competition among labor unions and
threaten the monopolistic model of union representation in Argentina
that has prevailed for more than 60 years. General Labor
Confederation (CGT) representatives immediately rejected the ruling,
calling it ""a provocation that would cloud the social climate.""
¶2. (SBU) GOA officials swiftly sought to minimize the ruling's
impact. Labor Minister Carlos Tomada stated that the ruling would
only apply to the specific case decided by the Supreme Court.
Interior Minister Florencio Randazzo indicated that the ruling's
applicability would be limited to the public sector. Meanwhile,
opposition parties are working on different initiatives either to
reform the Trade Unions Law or to bring Article 41 in line with the
Supreme Court's ruling. However, the bills will most likely not
pass in the Kirchner-controlled Congress. END SUMMARY.
-------------------------------------------
""SIMPLE"" REGISTRATION VS. LEGAL RECOGNITION
-------------------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) For over 60 years, Peronists have controlled the General
Confederation of Labor (CGT), which has had a virtual monopoly over
worker representation since state-structured unionization was first
introduced by Labor Minister and then-President Juan Domingo Peron
in the mid-1940s. The CGT has approximately 3 million members, and
represents over two-thirds of the unionized workforce.
Approximately 40 percent of Argentina's workforce is unionized.
¶4. (SBU) Under Argentine law, the GOA recognizes two types of
unions, each with a different set of rights: 1) unions that are
simply registered with the MOL and have a limited scope of rights;
and 2) unions that are not only registered with the MOL, but have
also been officially recognized as the most representative union in
a given sector. Legally recognized unions can exercise a wider
range of privileges, such as calling for elections to appoint
delegates, exercising the right to strike, negotiating bargaining
agreements, appointing delegates to international organizations, and
compelling employers to directly deduct union dues from unionized
workers' salaries. For years, the government has only granted legal
recognition to the CGT and its affiliates, although former President
Nestor Kirchner and his wife, current President Cristina Fernandez
de Kirchner, have flirted with the idea of granting legal
recognition to a rival confederation known as the Argentine Workers
Confederation (CTA) since 2003.
-------------------
A LANDMARK DECISION
-------------------
¶5. (SBU) In 2003, the Public Employees' Association (ATE), a
CTA-affiliated union, was prevented from holding elections by the
CGT-affiliated Civil Servants of the Armed Forces Union (PECIFA).
PECIFA cited Article 41 of the Trade Unions law which stipulates
that only state-recognized unions are entitled to call elections to
vote for delegates, and that these delegates must be members of that
union. ATE filed a petition in protest that same year, and its
petition was subsequently dismissed by both the Ministry of Labor
and the Labor Court of Appeals.
¶6. (SBU) On November 11, the Argentine Supreme Court deemed Article
41 to be in breach of the constitution, which guarantees freedom of
association and union democracy, as well as of several international
conventions adopted by Argentina, including the International Labor
Organization (ILO) Convention 87 on Freedom of Association and
Protection of the Right to Organize. (Note: Since 1989, the ILO has
called on Argentina to reform its labor laws to bring it into
compliance with Convention 87.) In their ruling, the judges said
""by favoring or not favoring a given trade union with respect to
others, governments can influence workers' decisions when they
select a union to join."" In addition, the ruling asserted that the
MOL's ""discretion"" in awarding official union recognition ""violates
international treaties."" The ruling, if broadly applied, would
expand representation rights to labor delegates affiliated with
unions that are simply registered with, but not legally recognized
by, the Labor Ministry (MOL).
---------------------
CTA HAILS DECISION...
---------------------
¶7. (SBU) The Supreme Court's decision surprised government
officials and CGT and CTA representatives alike. The CTA, which has
been unsuccessfully demanding legal recognition by the MOL for 16
years, celebrated the decision. (Note: The CTA is an autonomous,
politically non-partisan organization, with an estimated 1.5 million
members, including public and private employees, as well as
unemployed and retired people.) The CTA and other labor groups not
affiliated with the CGT had long contended that the Trade Unions Law
guaranteed the CGT and its affiliated unions a virtual monopoly over
unionized labor. They argued that this contravened ILO Convention
87 and prevented the CTA and CTA-affiliates from obtaining full
legal standing. Although the Supreme Court's decision refers
specifically to Article 41 of the Trade Unions Law, several labor
experts consider this a landmark decision as it upholds the
supremacy of international treaties over domestic labor law. CTA
legal representative Horacio Meguira asserted that the decision will
compel the Congress to amend the current Trade Unions Law in order
to honor Argentina's international obligation to guarantee the right
to freely organize.
¶8. (SBU) The GOA has considered the possibility of granting legal
recognition to the CTA since Nestor Kirchner took office in 2003,
and had relaxed some labor regulations to allow the CTA to gain
extra rights in recent years, such as a seat on the Wage Council and
on the Board of the National Institute of Social Services for
Retirees and Pensioners (PAMI). CTA lawyers say they believe the
verdict not only cracks open the CGT's monopoly on worker
representation, but also sets a precedent for legal rulings in favor
of union freedom and democracy in future cases.
----------------------------------------
...WHILE GOA SEEKS TO MINIMIZE IMPACT...
----------------------------------------
¶9. (SBU) GOA officials swiftly sought to minimize the ruling's
impact. Labor Minister Carlos Tomada stated that the ruling would
only apply to ATE, and indicated that unions that wanted similar
treatment would have to go through the courts. He dismissed
outright the possibility of amending the Trade Unions Law. Justice
Minister Anibal Fernandez opined that the Supreme Court had resolved
an abstract case between two unions in the public sector, and
Interior Minister Florencio Randazzo stated that the decision was
limited to civil servants in the public sector.
-----------------------------------
...AND THE CGT CALLS IT ""A MISTAKE""
-----------------------------------
¶10. (SBU) CGT representatives strongly criticized the decision.
Hugo Moyano, CGT Secretary General and Vice President of the
Peronist Party (PJ), called the ruling ""a mistake."" CGT spokesman
Hector Daer said the confederation would accept the decision, but
would urge the government to make a ""political decision regarding
the issue."" CGT Human Rights Secretary and leader of the Judicial
Workers' Union Julio Piumato called it ""a provocation that would
cloud the social climate."" CGT Assistant Secretary Juan Belen
characterized the decision as ""crazy"" and said it ""lacks common
sense."" Others stated the judicial decision seeks to divide the
labor movement. CGT legal representative and National Deputy of the
Kirchners' ruling Victory Front coalition Hector Recalde blamed
journalists for having ""distorted the Supreme Court's decision"" and
defended current domestic regulations. He warned that allowing
several trade unions the power to represent workers in the same
company or line of work could ""dilute the strength of unions, at a
time when the economy is becoming increasingly concentrated.""
¶11. (SBU) Moyano and other CGT leaders have been supportive of both
Kirchner administrations and have even delayed or minimized labor
demands to accommodate the government. Energized by the Supreme
Court decision as well as the prospect of imminent layoffs due to
the expected economic downturn, CGT leaders have suddenly turned
belligerent and are publicly calling for a 500 peso (US$155)
year-end bonus for all workers plus restrictions on layoffs,
including the imposition of double or triple severance pay on
employers, in addition to calling on the GOA to circumscribe the
impact of the Supreme Court decision.
-------------------------------------------
CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE BELIEVES DECISION WILL COMPLICATE LABOR
RELATIONS
-------------------------------------------
¶12. (SBU) Representatives of commercial and industrial chambers
also expressed concern over the ruling, but for diametrically
opposed reasons. They predicted that competition among labor unions
would result in tougher labor demands. The President of the
Argentine Industrial Chamber (UIA) Juan Carlos Lascurain said the
chamber's legal team was analyzing the ruling, but opined that
freedom of association is always a ""complicated"" issue. The
President of the General Economic Confederation (CGE) Guillermo
Gonzalez Galicia said the decision would mean that industry would
have to negotiate with more than one representative, each with
different labor demands, making it even more difficult for industry
to reach agreements with labor. The President of the Argentine
Confederation of Medium-Sized Companies (CAME), Mr. Osvaldo Cornide,
echoed the sentiment, saying that small- and medium- size companies
always benefited from negotiating with one union per sector, and
that the ruling would imply labor relations chaos. CTA lawyer
Meguira downplayed these concerns saying that there are many
examples where different unions have negotiated jointly with
employers. He cited seven unions in commercial air transport and
12 in the maritime and ports sector as examples.
---------------------------
Experts Praise the Decision
---------------------------
¶13. (SBU) Labor and constitutional experts alike praised the Supreme
Court's Decision. Enrique Rodriguez, former Labor Minister under
ex-President Carlos Menem, opined that the ruling would allow more
than one union per sector to obtain legal recognition.
Constitutional scholar Daniel Sabsay said it would eliminate
monopoly control over labor relations and encourage greater
democracy in trade union activity. Both Sabsay and Rodriguez agreed
that the CTA should now receive legal recognition.
-----------
NEXT STEPS
-----------
¶14. (SBU) While Labor Minister Tomada denied any plans to amend the
current Trade Unions Law, Senator Gerardo Morales, the Chairman of
the Labor and Social Security Committee in the Senate and Head of
the opposition Radical Party (UCR), announced his intention to amend
current regulations to establish freedom of association and
affiliation, ensure internal democracy in trade unions, allow
minority representation in unions, prohibit reelection of labor
leaders, and demand greater transparency in the management of union
funds and union-managed healthcare organizations. Radical Deputy
Miguel Giubergia introduced a bill on November 14 to bring Article
41 of the current Trade Union Law in line with the Supreme Court's
ruling. Other opposition blocs like the Civic Coalition, dissident
Socialists, and leftist groups are drafting their own bills to
establish a more democratic labor union system. Meanwhile, FPV
Deputy and CGT lawyer Recalde said he is working on a bill to limit
the ruling's impact, although the CFK administration and FPV
Congressional leaders have not yet backed this initiative publicly.
Although opposition blocs are enthusiastic about reforming the Trade
Unions Law, their initiatives will most likely not pass in the
Kirchner-controlled Congress.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶15. (SBU) The Supreme Court's ruling demonstrates that judicial
independence still has a pulse in Argentina. The ruling attacks
the core of this country's Peronist-corporatist Model, seeking to
check the previously unchallenged power of the CGT. If applied
broadly, the ruling not only threatens CGT hegemony over labor
relations, but also the very foundation upon which Peronism is
based. Argentina's trade union system has long been the central
pillar of the corporatist model put in place by Peron 60 years ago,
and it has successfully resisted reform efforts by military and
democratic governments seeking a more pluralistic system for over
half a century. It is not surprising that the CGT and, the current
neo-Peronist government will seek to limit the ruling's
applicability, but the Court's decision could be a positive step if
it helps introduce greater competition, democracy, and transparency
into Argentina's labor movement. END COMMENT.
WAYNE