

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06OTTAWA3561, NEW LIBERAL LEADER DION LIKELY TO PUSH
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06OTTAWA3561.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06OTTAWA3561 | 2006-12-08 12:18 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO0159
RR RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #3561/01 3421218
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 081218Z DEC 06
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4585
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
RUEAEPA/EPA WASHDC
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHDC
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 OTTAWA 003561
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR WHA, OES AND EB
EPA FOR OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR AND INTERNATIONAL
AFFAIRS
DOE FOR POLICY AND INTERNATIONAL
WHITE HOUSE FOR CEQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV ENRG PINR CA
SUBJECT: NEW LIBERAL LEADER DION LIKELY TO PUSH
ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
REF: A. MONTREAL 1205
¶B. OTTAWA 3423 AND PREVIOUS
¶C. MONTREAL 826
Sensitive but unclassified. Please protect accordingly.
¶1. (SBU) Summary. The victory of former Environment Minister
Stephane Dion in the federal Liberal leadership battle seems
certain to keep the environment and especially the Kyoto
Protocol squarely in the center of domestic political
discourse. As Environment Minister, Dion was closely
identified with the Kyoto Protocol. He has consistently
criticized the Conservative government's decision to abandon
Canada's Kyoto commitments as unachievable and just as
regularly insisted that his own climate change and energy
program, outlined at length but missing many specifics, would
allow Canada to meet those commitments if implemented by
"early 2007." Even though Dion received generally good
reviews as Environment Minister, his record is not without
blemish, particularly since the Martin Liberal government
made little progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. A
Dion-led government seems certain to focus greater attention
on the environment and to pursue its environmental objectives
aggressively. End Summary.
¶2. (U) Stephane Dion's victory in the December 2 federal
Liberal Party leadership race (ref a) heightened focus on
Canada's already vocal environmental debate, specifically on
whether a Liberal victory in the next federal election
(expected in 2007) would see a re-commitment to the Kyoto
Protocol commitments Canada assumed in 1997. In any event,
Dion's rise seems certain to maintain the rhetoric on the
environment at a high level, perhaps highlighting the
Conservatives' relative lack of success in selling the
Canadian public on their own environmental and climate change
program.
¶3. (U) The environment was not Dion's sole focus during the
leadership campaign ) he says economic prosperity and social
justice shared equal billing ) but his tenure as federal
Minister of the Environment from July 2004 to January 2006,
and his regular campaign criticism of the Conservative's
Clean Air Act, seem to link him more closely to the
environment than these other elements of his platform. He is
strongly identified with Canada's commitment to the Kyoto
Protocol, and his campaign rhetoric on the environment was
notable for its focus on the Harper government's admission in
May that the Kyoto target was not achievable. He
consistently charged the Harper government with betraying its
"responsibility to live up to its international treaty
obligations" (i.e., the Protocol), and the first paragraph of
his Liberal leadership campaign's energy and climate change
plan, for example, accuses the Conservatives of having "cut,
postponed or simply abandoned every meaningful federal
initiative to combat climate change and increase energy
efficiency."
The Environment ) Important in Domestic Politics,
but not all Good News for the Liberals
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶4. (U) Polling data consistently provide evidence of the
importance Canadians attach to the environment, and one poll
taken early last month found that Canadians, for the first
time since 1990, claimed to be more concerned about the state
of the environment than (perennial front runner) their own
health. That data also point out regional differences, with
respondents in Alberta and Quebec, which has its own climate
Qrespondents in Alberta and Quebec, which has its own climate
change strategy (ref c), the most likely to cite the
environment as their greatest concern; and some aspects of
the environment, for instance climate change and energy
conservation, regularly claim greater attention from the
public. A mid-November survey of British Columbians, for
example, found that 72 percent agreed they were "desperately
concerned" that climate change required "dramatic action."
Analysis noted this figure was substantially higher than the
63 percent of respondents across Canada polled two months
earlier, probably due to "increased media coverage of this
issue in the last few weeks." (Note: That increased media
coverage was almost certainly the spate of publicity, much of
it negative (ref b), surrounding the tabling of the Clean Air
Act by the Conservatives in late October.)
OTTAWA 00003561 002 OF 004
¶5. (U) While most observers give Dion good marks on the
environment and expect this issue may benefit from greater
focus in the government agenda if the Liberals win the next
election, Dion's credentials as Minister of the Environment
and the most visible face of the Liberal's past environmental
stewardship, are not entirely positive, and he has come in
for some criticism for being too focused on the Kyoto
protocol. The apolitical Commissioner for the Environment
and Sustainable Development (the CESD is part of the office
of the Auditor General of Canada) in a report released in
September 2006 noted a stark contrast between Dion's vision
of a green Canada and what the Liberals actually implemented
during their reign in power. That report noted at the
"government-wide level, our audits revealed inadequate
leadership, planning, and performance," and "(t)he federal
government has done too little and acted too slowly on
Canada's commitments to address the challenge of climate
change". In a line sure to be used by Dion's adversaries in
the next election, CESD stated "(e)ven if the measures
contained in the previous government's 2005 plan had been
fully implemented, it is difficult to say whether the
projected emission reductions would have been enough to meet
our Kyoto obligations." (Note. More tellingly, Canada's
greenhouse gas emissions in 2004 stood at 27 percent above
their 1990 Kyoto base year level (and 35 percent above
Canada's Kyoto target). Emissions increased at a fairly
constant rate from the early 1990s through 2004, the last
year for which official figures are available and years when
the Liberal Party was in power (1993-2006). Dion certainly
does not bear individual responsibility for the whole of the
Liberal Party's record on emissions, but that record ) if
examined critically ) seems unlikely to provide his next
campaign with much comfort.)
¶6. (SBU) The CESD report on Climate Change also remarked on
the federal government's inability to act on its own in this
sphere and suggested that achieving success on a complex and
pervasive problem such as climate change requires "bringing
various players onside and in mobilizing concerted action."
While CESD was referring also to private sector stakeholders,
this concern is especially evident in provincial-federal
relations; the two levels of government in Canada share
responsibility for the environment and constantly wrangle
over who has jurisdiction (and who will pay the bills). Thus
there is no guarantee a Prime Minister could implement
effectively a vigorous and robust green agenda in the face of
provincial opposition. (Note. Typically national
environmental standards would be set by consensus among the
14 federal, provincial and territorial environment ministers
sitting as the Canadian Council of Ministers of the
Environment (CCME). The CCME cannot impose its conclusions
on provinces since it does not have the authority to
implement or enforce legislation, and each jurisdiction
decides whether or not to adopt CCME proposals.) The
Conservative government was reminded of this in October when
Ontario's Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty, in response to the
Clean Air Act's push for tougher standards for vehicles by
2010, angrily exclaimed, "(t)he one thing we will not abide
is any effort on the part of the national government to
Qis any effort on the part of the national government to
unduly impose greenhouse-gas-emissions reductions on the
province of Ontario at the expense of our auto sector." (The
Clean Air Act proposes to require tougher fuel efficiency
standards, not tougher emissions standards. Perhaps McGuinty
misunderstood. In any event, the Conservatives seem to have
learned their lesson on this score from their relative lack
of success in rolling out the Clean Air Act, and are devoting
considerable attention to consulting with provinces and
industry stakeholders on the overall concepts of the Act.)
So what might a Dion Environment Plan Look Like?
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶7. (U) Dion called his campaign platform on the environment
(but covering energy and climate change more specifically)
"Building a Sustainable Future for Canada." The plan,
largely a repeat of the Project Green he pushed in 2005 while
Environment Minister, lays out aggressive targets for
emissions reductions throughout the Canadian economy, but
provides little detail on proposed programs and no estimates
of the costs needed to implement them. (His overall plan for
environmental sustainability also includes shorter elements
addressing health, clean air, and clean water.)
OTTAWA 00003561 003 OF 004
¶8. (U) Dion's energy and climate change plan promises
programs to provide individuals with tax credits for home
energy efficiency improvements and purchases of fuel
efficient vehicles, as well as committing Canada to matching
the most stringent vehicle emissions standards in the U.S.
(specifically California). On the energy side, Dion would
support research, development and deployment of green
technologies (by Canadian companies), make more stringent
efficiency standards for appliances, and mandate 10 percent
ethanol content for gasoline and biodiesel by 2010. Dion
would also adjust preferential cost recovery rules for oil
sands to promote "zero net impact development." Industry
would immediately face caps on emissions and trading, but the
price for verified reductions would be capped initially at
C$15 to ensure manageable compliance costs during the first
Kyoto commitment period (to 2012).
¶9. (U) To promote renewable energy, the plan would provide
incentives for wind and other renewable power production and
establish, in consultation with the provinces, renewable
portfolio standards. Owners of commercial buildings would
receive accelerated depreciation allowances for energy
efficiency investments, and communities would be eligible for
a variety of funds to support mass transit, weatherization,
and urban renewal. The government would not escape: Dion
would set targets for the federal government and crown
corporations to use at least 20 percent renewable energy
immediately, moving to 30 percent by 2010 and 80 percent by
¶2020. (Note. This ambitious target only makes sense if the
plan includes large scale hydro and nuclear in the renewables
category, which often is not the case. In 2002 hydro and
nuclear supplied 70 percent of Canada's electricity. Other
renewables, including biomass, solar, and wind, accounted for
a very small share of Canada's electricity that year.
Generation from these sources is expanding rapidly, but from
a very low base.)
¶10. (U) And certainly, Kyoto played prominently in Dion's
plan, which claims that enactment of all of its measures by
early 2007 would still put Canada on track to meet its Kyoto
Protocol commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 6
percent from their 1990 level by 2012. Dion estimates his
plan would cut greenhouse gas emissions by between 238 and
308 million tons by 2012, enough to meet those targets. In
Dion's words, "the Kyoto Protocol is the only credible
international tool to fight the coming climate crisis, and
Canada must honor its commitments under the agreement, while
leading the negotiations to extend it past 2012."
¶11. (SBU) Dion's ambitious plans (including the 2005 Green
Plan) have taken their share of criticism. On one hand, Dion
is criticized by some environmentalists for borrowing heavily
(and in many instances word for word) from the work of David
Suzuki, one of Canada's leading and most vocal environmental
personalities. On the other, Dion has never made a secret of
his plan's reliance, at least in the initial stages, on the
purchase of credits internationally (either from transition
economy "hot air" or from actual reductions from Joint
Implementation or Clean Development Mechanism projects),
prompting charges that Canada could spend as much as C$5
billion yet see no benefit domestically. Then too, Dion's
Qbillion yet see no benefit domestically. Then too, Dion's
plans have provided little detail on project specifics or
costs to implement or sources of funds.
Does it Differ from the Conservative's Clean Air Act?
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶12. (U) Certainly the Conservative Clean Air act also lacks
detail on program specifics, at least partly because the
government is still in the process of consulting with
provinces and industry. (This extensive round of
negotiations, in fact, draws criticism from both the
political opposition and some environmentalists who claim it
only delays effective action, since the Liberals had already
done "enough" consulting.) And, the Clean Air Act does have
longer time frames than Dion's plans. It envisions absolute
reductions in greenhouse gas emissions of 45-65 percent (from
2003 levels), but not until 2050. On the other hand, the
Tory legislation does contain specifics on a number of
programs to regulate pollutants, to gain provincial support
through enhanced use of "equivalency agreements" that focus
on outcomes rather than specify technology, and to set
mandatory fuel economy standards and efficiency standards for
OTTAWA 00003561 004 OF 004
appliances.
¶13. (SBU) However, the Harper government's ability to
implement its own clean air and climate change plans is
complicated by the Clean Air Act's status in Parliament (ref
b). Not only are there two other competing climate change
bills before the House, but the Clean Air Act has been
assigned to an ad hoc drafting committee for revision before
it comes back to the House for a second reading. GOC
contacts will not (and really cannot) speculate on the form
of the bill that will be reported out by the drafting
committee, but they do expect required short-term targets for
emissions reductions will feature prominently.
Interestingly, they believe the re-worked bill may not call
for meeting Kyoto commitments. What sets the Tory plan apart
though, is the degree to which it relies not on the passage
of new legislation, but on the existing Canadian
Environmental Protection Act of 1999. With respect to air
pollutants ) but not greenhouse gases ) the Clean Air Act
would enhance the GOC's ability to regulate, but the legal
authority to do so derives from CEPA and thus does not depend
on the new legislation.
What if?
--------
¶14. (SBU) There seems to be little doubt that a Dion-led
government would focus greater attention on the environment,
and likely on climate change specifically. Certainly this is
what the public expects (another poll in taken in early
November found that 70 percent of Canadians think the Clean
Air Act is not tough enough), and Dion himself in his first
press conference as Liberal leader, stressed the
environment's importance to him on a personal level. He
announced that he would pull together the best environmental
plans from the party to develop "the best for energy and
climate change that you can have in Canada."
¶15. (SBU) And how would he approach pursuing his
environmental goals as prime minister? Dion himself
acknowledges a "rather willful temperament" and was regarded
as very aggressive when he was Environment Minister, both on
issues and in promoting Environment Canada's bureaucratic
interests. He had the reputation among some of pursuing his
objectives without too much regard for balance and for
discrediting the arguments of those who disagreed, and
sources report that he was surprisingly not always well
briefed on environmental issues and ignored facts that did
not support his position. And, he was known to display
remarkable insensitivity to U.S. views on most environmental
issues. While it is far from certain that Dion will be
Canada's next prime minister, the odds of him gaining the
office at some point are in his favor, since every Liberal
Party leader since 1896 has served as Canada's prime
minister. The exact environmental and climate change
programs a Dion-led government would pursue are also
uncertain, of course, but expect their pursuit to be
energetic and assertive.
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa
WILKINS