

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06REYKJAVIK107, ICELAND: SCENESETTER FOR MARCH 31 DEFENSE TALKS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06REYKJAVIK107.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06REYKJAVIK107 | 2006-03-29 11:16 | 2011-01-13 05:37 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Reykjavik |
VZCZCXYZ0001
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHRK #0107/01 0881116
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 291116Z MAR 06
FM AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2657
INFO RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO IMMEDIATE 0223
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO IMMEDIATE 0195
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L REYKJAVIK 000107
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
OSLO FOR DATT AND ODC
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/28/2016
TAGS: NATO MARR PREL PGOV KPAO IC
SUBJECT: ICELAND: SCENESETTER FOR MARCH 31 DEFENSE TALKS
REF: A. REYKJAVIK 85
¶B. REYKJAVIK 90
¶C. REYKJAVIK 91
¶D. REYKJAVIK 92
¶E. REYKJAVIK 93
¶F. REYKJAVIK 97
¶G. REYKJAVIK 98
¶H. REYKJAVIK 106
Classified By: Ambassador Carol van Voorst Reason: 1.5 (a) and (d)
¶1. (C) Summary: Since 3/15, when the U.S. announced the
realignment of its force presence at Naval Air Station
Keflavik (NASKEF), the Icelandic government has made its
unhappiness with the decision plain. FM Haarde ) the
government,s key decision maker ) is looking to the 3/31
talks to offer the sort of specificity that will enable him
to tell his party and his public that the Americans are
serious about their commitment to the 1951 Defense Agreement.
Our readiness to offer concrete and credible proposals in
the series of defense talks with Iceland will strengthen
Haarde,s preference (and that of pragmatic bureaucrats and
rising young politicians and other opinion leaders) to seek
continued close security ties with the U.S. Eed summary.
----------------------
UNANTICIPATED DECISION
----------------------
¶2. (C) The Government of Iceland is just now coming to terms
with the news delivered March 15 that the U.S. would be
removing its four F-15 fighter jets as well as combat search
and rescue (CSAR) assets from NASKEF. Governing Independence
(IP) and Progressive (PP) Party luminaries seemed genuinely
shocked that the U.S. would take this step without further
negotiations or a long drawdown calendar. There have been a
flurry of party meetings and town hall, meetings with
residents of the Sudurnes region (where the base is located),
and the subject has been discussed in ministerial calls on
Allied foreign ministers (Norway, Denmark, France and
Germany) and Russia,s foreign minister. The Prime Minister
has appealed to the NATO Secretary General. Although there
has been plenty of criticism from the opposition that the
government should have seen this decision coming, the
governing coalition,s complete lack of contingency planning
indicates its leaders assumed they would have much more time
to prepare the country.
----------------------
REACHING OUT TO EUROPE
----------------------
¶3. (C) In response to what many interpret as U.S. rejection,
Reykjavik is showing new interest in cooperation with the
Europeans. &I think it is clear that in the future, Iceland
will move closer to Europe and farther away from the United
States on foreign-policy issues,8 PM Asgrimsson told
Morgunbladid in late March. Influential Social Democratic
Alliance Chairman Ingibjorg Solrun Gisladottir said it would
be natural for Iceland to rely for defense cooperation on
countries bordering on the North Atlantic: the UK, Denmark,
and Norway. Haarde himself is building bridges to Europe but
not burning any with the U.S.: he is enough of a realist to
know that European governments are unlikely to offer more
than sympathetic noises, and that any European offers of
defense equipment are likely to be on a purely commercial
basis.
¶4. (C) At the same time, a current of resentment against the
U.S. has also been flowing (reftels). The sudden
&unilateral8(to repeat a word embraced these past two weeks
by politicians, pundits, and citizens alike) decision, coming
in the course of what ministers had presented to the public
as ongoing negotiations, is being painted as evidence of U.S.
egotism and arrogance ) even by opposition politicians happy
to see the base close, and ordinary citizens with no
particular interest in the base or even the broader concept
of national defense.
----------------
PLAYING CATCH-UP
----------------
¶5. (C) Only fully independent since 1944, Iceland has little
experience looking out for itself ) or, set in a more
negative light, little sense of answerability for its own
well-being.
¶6. (C) Some in the Icelandic Government (e.g. FM Haarde and
chief defense negotiator Albert Jonsson) are nervous that the
U.S., with limited strategic interest in maintaining any sort
of presence here, will quietly bow out of the 1951 Agreement
(refs A and D). Others (e.g. PM Asgrimsson and Justice
Minister Bjarnason), feeling betrayed by the style and
substance of decisions already announced, no longer trust us
to meet our responsibilities under the treaty (refs G and H).
A third faction (which we believe includes former PM/FM
David Oddsson as well as other Independence Party stalwarts
of his generation) believes Iceland should react to the U.S.
decision by abrogating the treaty themselves and seeking
security elsewhere in the Alliance (ref D). And then there
is the pacifist left (personified by Left Green Party
Chairman Steingrimur Sigfusson), which never believed the
U.S. was a good mate for Iceland and has been only too happy
to crow, &We told you so8 (ref B).
¶7. (C). Asgrimsson and Haarde have reacted quite differently
to the U.S. decision, both in public and private. The PM has
strongly criticized the pace and unilateral character of the
U.S. action, expressing skepticism that the U.S. will offer
serious alternatives to a full-time U.S. presence. In
contrast, Haarde (in the job for only a few months, and with
his ego tied less tightly to past government defense policy)
has taken a more measured tone, expressing regret while
focusing on the need to listen with an open mind to U.S.
proposals and seek to maintain the security relationship.
Haarde has been out of the country much of the time since the
announcement, which has resulted in Icelandic media giving
more play to Asgrimsson,s tough talk than to Haarde,s
forward-looking focus.
---------------
GETTING SERIOUS
---------------
¶8. (C) Within this cacophony is a core of career diplomats
and bureaucrats sincerely interested in a practical
U.S.-Icelandic partnership to confront the challenge of
providing national security in the 21st century. MFA
Political Director Bergdis Ellertsdottir and Defense Director
Jon Egill Egilsson, as well as Justice Ministry Legal
Director Ragna Arnadottir and Coast Guard Director Georg
Larusson, are all serious professionals who know that banging
their fists on tables will not prevent a terrorist attack or
save a drowning sailor.
¶9. (C) Though the working levels of the ministries have been
kept out of the information loop of late (ref D), they will
be present at the March 31 talks. Some among them have even
told us that they are excited to be present at the
creation,, to have their ideas on defense actually influence
their nation,s program choices as Iceland inevitably
develops a more independent security policy. We anticipate
that their relatively pragmatic and worldly approach will
ultimately prevail, in part because a rising generation of
MPs, local mayors, and other decision makers share their
pragmatic approach to security cooperation.
¶10. (C) Icelanders, who lived on a subsistence economy until
the last half century but now enjoy one of the world,s
highest standards of living, are above all practical people.
When they face the fact, as they must do soon, that other
Allies are not going to leap in to replace the defense goods
and services thus far supplied by the U.S., they will sign on
for a new, more evenly balanced course of cooperation. We
can make this evolution easier if we:
-- Offer concrete proposals for follow-on security programs,
of the sort now being worked by OSD, Joint Staff, and EUCOM,
that provide a &visible defense presence.8 Exercises,
rotational deployments, and enhanced information/intel
sharing will also make a strong impression.
-- Follow up the March 31 meetings with a series of detailed
proposals responsive to Icelanders, concerns as expressed in
our face-to-face meetings.
-- Remain attentive to domestic political imperatives. The
U.S. decision to keep some CSAR helicopters here until the
middle of September came as an enormous relief to Icelanders
scrambling to arrange for interim and long-term SAR
capability. Justice Minister Bjarnason said March 24 that he
aimed to propose an interim Icelandic SAR plan within three
weeks and a long-term plan within two months. The Icelanders
will be very interested in the information we supply at the
talks on FMS options. Whether or not Iceland decides to buy
American (and it might make sense for them to simplify
maintenance by buying more of the Eurocopter Puma or Dauphins
they already fly), we must be prepared to put forward some
serious options. Continuing our efforts to be helpful to
local base employees who are losing their jobs will also pay
dividends in public goodwill.
-- Initiate public and private links such as the proposed
Burns op-ed and periodic telephone calls. These public
manifestations of sustained USG interest in Iceland,s fate
would smooth the way for a mutually-beneficial follow-on deal.
-- Encourage them to get educated ) and to accept that they
too have responsibilities for security. Even with the U.S.
remaining its defense guarantor, as a wealthy country and
member of NATO, Iceland will have to pay towards its defense,
and its officials will finally need to do their homework on
security affairs so as to be educated consumers. This means
reiterating longstanding offers to welcome Icelanders to U.S.
service academies, war colleges, and the Marshall Center )
but also making clear that other forms of cooperation will be
contingent upon their developing their own security
expertise.
-- Finally, we should remain unruffled by calls for closer
European security ties, making it clear that the U.S. does
not feel threatened by Icelandic calls for closer security
ties with Europe, either in a NATO or EU context. Indeed, we
welcome burden sharing.
VAN VOORST
van Voorst