

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06WELLINGTON483, SOME QUESTION NZ'S DEFENSE STRATEGIES IN LIGHT OF RECENT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06WELLINGTON483.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06WELLINGTON483 | 2006-06-26 00:36 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO9887
RR RUEHNZ
DE RUEHWL #0483/01 1770036
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 260036Z JUN 06
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2942
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 0809
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHJJAA/JICPAC HONOLULU HI
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000483
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR D (FRITZ), EAP/FO, AND EAP/ANP
NSC FOR VICTOR CHA
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISD LIZ PHU
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV NZ
SUBJECT: SOME QUESTION NZ'S DEFENSE STRATEGIES IN LIGHT OF RECENT
SPENDING INCREASES
REF: WELLINGTON 449
Summary
-------
¶1. (SBU) Embassy contacts have generally welcomed the defense
spending increases in this year's budget. Some question, however,
the general direction of New Zealand defense policy, and others
remain concerned about what they say are continued problems with NZ
Defense Force (NZDF) recruitment and retention. Although increased
defense spending does not feature high on the political concerns of
voters in New Zealand, this could change were social spending
reduced as a consequence. End summary.
Details of the increased funding
--------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) As noted reftel, the NZDF received an extra capital
injection of - NZD 72 million (approximately USD 4.5 million) on top
off baseline finding in the 2006/7 budget, as part of the Defense
Sustainability Initiative (DSI). (FYI: DSI is a 10-year initiative
announced last year designed to enhance recruitment and retention,
including by increasing salaries and upgrading facilities. At the
time the budget was announced, Defense Minister Phil Goff declared
that this new expenditure ensured that the Government will achieve
its goal of contributing in a meaningful way to international
affairs and rebuilding a "modern, professional, and well-equipped
Defence Force." The budget also includes an NZD 305 million
(approximately US 188 million) allocation to various capital
projects for the 2006/07 financial year, under the Long Term
Development Plan the Government launched in 2002.
News of capital injection of spending is well received
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶3. (SBU) The injection of capital from this year's Budget and the
financial certainty that the DSI guarantees is widely welcomed by
some analysts of New Zealand defense matters. Peter Cozens of the
Centre of Strategic Studies at Victoria University in Wellington
believes that with DSI, funding, plans and political commitments are
now in place to allow the NZDF to meet its future policy objectives.
Dr. Lance Beath, a former New Zealand defense official and diplomat
now at Victoria University's School of Government, agrees.
¶4. (SBU) The Director of the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre at
the Australian National University, Dr. Robert Ayson, a New
Zealander who was formerly an advisor on New Zealand's Parliamentary
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Select Committee, believes that
the capital injection will enable the defense establishment to meet
the expectations of the current Labour Government.
The political argument is less about spending, more about general
direction
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶5. (SBU) The National, NZ First and ACT Parties have complained
about what they say is a lack of coherence in the Government's
strategic decision-making. In particular, they have questioned
NZDF's asset acquisition in past years (such as Light Armored
Vehicles instead of tanks) and the dearth of Government White Papers
published since Labour took office in 1999.
¶6. (SBU) Paul Buchanan, an Auckland University security analyst who
often provides New Zealand media with blunt assessments of security
policy, believes that increasing expenditure is too simplistic a
cure for perceived defense ills in New Zealand. He believes that
New Zealand needs to align its strategic outlook with its resource
base, taking into account the country's location, and relevant
security threats. He argues that so long as the political argument
is about money alone and comparisons are made to larger states, New
Zealand will continue to drift with regards to its strategic
position.
No, it's about spending
-----------------------
¶7. (SBU) It is true that some analysts say New Zealand's per capita
military spending is insufficient compared to that in Australia.
Most compare the United States, United Kingdom, France or Germany.
The inference is that New Zealand is not pulling its weight on
matters of international security and instead is freeloading off the
WELLINGTON 00000483 002 OF 003
Australians and others. Beath notes that New Zealand is
historically parsimonious when it comes to defense spending,
especially when compared to Australia.
¶8. (SBU) However, Dr. Jim Rolfe, a former policy advisor in the
department of Prime Minister and Cabinet and now an Associate
Professor at the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies based in
Hawaii, believes that comparing New Zealand and Australian defense
budgets is not valid because of differing strategic perceptions and
needs. Buchanan agrees, saying it is "absurd to compare a small
country like New Zealand with the behemoths like the US and the UK,
or even Australia." Instead, he contends it's more logical to
compare New Zealand with other small democracies, such as Portugal,
Uruguay, Norway and Costa Rica who "each share a similar strategic
problem if not situation with New Zealand." Buchanan claims that
because these small democracies and New Zealand spend similar
amounts on defense, New Zealand is in the mainstream of defense
spending and foreign military commitment by small democracies.
Defense spending typically loses out to social spending
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶9. (SBU) New Zealand is also no different from other small
democracies when it comes to other spending priorities.
Historically, New Zealand budgets have allocated the majority of
funds to domestic social programs, particularly health, education
and welfare. Moreover, since the Vietnam War New Zealand
governments have -- in the absence of imminent threat -- been
reluctant to engage in sustained external military operations
without majority support. The Government's unwillingness to commit
combat troops to Iraq is testimony to this.
Defense spending not an issue that resonates with voters
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶10. (SBU) According to Beath "the average New Zealander is not
sophisticated enough to grasp the nuances of defense spending."
However, many more New Zealanders are critically aware of the new
post 9/11 security environment and the need to secure New Zealand's
immediate region and border from threats and to protect the region
from instability. Therefore, the recent increases in defense and
related regional and border security spending do not seem to have
resulted in any noticeable public outcry. But it is also unlikely
that renewed calls from National for greater military spending will
echo with New Zealand voters. Most New Zealanders still accept that
the physical defense of New Zealand's borders is dependant on the
country's larger military friends. Nor would they want to see
military spending eat into social welfare spending, a deeply-rooted
and widely accepted tradition in New Zealand.
Human capital most critical issue
---------------------------------
¶11. (SBU) Government and critics alike acknowledge that the most
critical issues facing New Zealand defense establishment is low
personnel retention and recruitment rates. In a buoyant labor
market, many highly skilled defense staff - civilian and military -
are being lured to other organizations by more attractive salary
packages. Cozens believes the loss of human capital is the greatest
challenge facing NZDF and greatly limits the country's operational
military capacity. Although he applauds the focus on building up
human capital in the DSI, Cozens notes that at present there is
barely a sufficient number of personnel to attend to the operational
obligations of the New Zealand Defence Force, a view endorsed by
Beath.
¶12. (SBU) The issue of personnel retention and recruitment is part
of the political debate. Ron Mark, defence spokesman for NZ First,
has campaigned on the need to apportion funding to increase defense
salaries across the board. This, he argues, is the key to
strengthening personnel retention and recruitment rates in the armed
services.
¶13. (SBU) In a recent appearance in front of Parliament's foreign
affairs, defence and trade committee, Goff announced that the shroud
of secrecy that has traditionally cloaked the SAS will be lifted,
albeit slightly, to offer more transparency. This pleased Mark,
himself a former member of the SAS, who though acknowledging the
need for secrecy on operational matters stated that the "the high
and sometimes unnecessary level of secrecy was hindering public
scrutiny of the [SAS] force." This, he argued, hindered the ability
to recruit and retain SAS troops given the competitive market for
their skills. Mark said that at present the members of Police
WELLINGTON 00000483 003 OF 003
Special Tactics Group are paid more than the SAS but are doing less
operationally.
¶14. (SBU) During the Committee hearing Goff also acknowledged NZDF
recruitment is difficult but has said that a "not ungenerous" pay
package introduced in 2005 went some way to address this issue. He
stated that the current defense salary range is from NZD 80,000 to
140,000 (USD49,000 to 86,000) including benefits. Yet despite this,
Goff concluded, the armed services would continue to struggle to
compete with lucrative private security contracts in Iraq, for
example, which can pay up to NZD 300,000 tax-free.
McCormick