

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07STATE152799, STEERING GROUP NON-PAPER FOR THE PARTNERSHIP FOR
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07STATE152799.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07STATE152799 | 2007-11-05 22:30 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Secretary of State |
Tim W Hayes 11/06/2007 02:13:27 PM From DB/Inbox: Tim W Hayes
Cable
Text:
UNCLAS SENSITIVE SECSTATE 152799
SIPDIS
CX:
ACTION: ECON
INFO: FCS POL DCM AMB CONS PA RAO FAS MGT PMA
DISSEMINATION: ECON /1
CHARGE: PROG
VZCZCAYO181
OO RUEHAK
DE RUEHC #2799/01 3092247
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O P 052230Z NOV 07
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA IMMEDIATE 1916
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA IMMEDIATE 6157
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA IMMEDIATE 9448
RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN IMMEDIATE 7544
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO IMMEDIATE 8653
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA IMMEDIATE 8399
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO IMMEDIATE 7482
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL IMMEDIATE 5298
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO IMMEDIATE 1376
RUEHWR/AMEMBASSY WARSAW IMMEDIATE 9260
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON IMMEDIATE 4525
INFO RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN PRIORITY 0481
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 3056
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 5529
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 STATE 152799
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
USOECD - CHARLES RANDOLPH
PAUL REID
CURTIS STONE
USOAS FOR BOB MANZANARES
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AU BR CA CI EAID ET JA KDEM KS MX NL NZ PL PO
PREL, TU, UK, OAS, DA, OECD
SUBJECT: STEERING GROUP NON-PAPER FOR THE PARTNERSHIP FOR
DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE (PDG)
REF: A. STATE 106990
¶B. STATE 108794
¶C. STATE 115400
¶1. (SBU) This is an action request; please see para 5.
¶2. (SBU) Background: The Partnership for Democratic
Governance was successfully rolled out at a well-attended
high level event co-hosted by OECD and UNDP in New York on
October 1, 2007. The Department appreciates Posts' support
and efforts which made the launch of the PDG a great success.
The current founding members of the PDG are: Australia,
Brazil, Canada, Chile, Denmark, Japan, Korea, Mexico, New
Zealand, Poland, Turkey, the U.S., OECD, UNDP, OAS and the
Inter-American Development Bank. The U.S. and other founding
members must now turn our attention to effectively
implementing this new multilateral initiative at OECD.
Founding members will meet in Paris on November 12 to have an
informal discussion on PDG implementation and to prepare for
the first meeting of the PDG,s Steering Group tentatively
scheduled for January 28-29, 2008. The UK and possibly
France will participate in these discussions as observers but
have not yet joined the PDG. Paris, London and Berlin are
slugged for information only.
¶3. (SBU) Action Request: Drawing on REFTELs and key PDG
material at www.oecd.org/pdg, Department requests action
posts to convey points contained in paras 4 and 5 and deliver
the non-paper in para 6 on outstanding governance issues of
the PDG to host governments. Embassy should ask for initial
comments on the draft non-paper by COB November 15 and inform
host government that the U.S. hopes to discuss issues in the
non-paper with delegations at the November 12 meeting in
Paris. We view this as a working document and welcome
comments and input from other partners as we move forward.
¶4. (SBU) Pilot Assessments: Department requests that Posts
inform other partners that the U.S. has begun to seek input
and assessments from our own embassies and USAID missions on
potential PDG pilot programs in Africa, Asia and Latin
America. Given the relatively short initial period for the
PDG Advisory Unit of three years, we think it is important to
feed as much information to the new unit as possible and
inform its decisions about dialogue and exploration with
target countries. We expect UNDP to begin similar
assessments and welcome their participation in the
development of templates and procedures for selection of
target countries; however, posts should encourage other
partner countries to join us in gathering and feeding
information to the new unit as soon as they are able to in
parallel with UNDP,s development of its own assessment
framework.
¶5. (SBU) Country Co-Chair: OECD Secretary General Gurria will
chair the first Steering Group meeting of the PDG but the PDG
terms of reference require that a co-chair be selected at the
first Steering Group meeting. The U.S. feels strongly that
the other co-chair of the Steering Group should be a partner
government serving perhaps on an annual rotating basis. We
believe that Chile would make an ideal first country co-chair
for the Steering Group and posts should communicate this view
to host governments and seek their opinions on this issue.
¶6. (SBU) Begin non-paper:
Non-Paper: PDG Governance Issues
This non-paper addresses two important issues that members of
the PDG will need to decide in the coming months:
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AU BR CA CI EAID ET JA KDEM KS MX NL NZ PL PO
PREL, TU, UK, OAS, DA, OECD
SUBJECT: STEERING GROUP NON-PAPER FOR THE PARTNERSHIP FOR
DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE (PD
(1) Standards for admitting new members into the Partnership,
as outlined in the attached OECD note; and
(2) Principles that should guide the process for selecting
countries for PDG-sponsored assistance.
Membership Standards: In accordance with the attached OECD
note, all countries wishing to join the Partnership must
subscribe to the PDG's Declaration of Principles and
Objectives. The issue is whether this is both a necessary
and sufficient condition for membership, or whether
additional standards should be applied in considering the
accession of new members prior to and after the January
Steering Group members.
From the outset, the U.S. has understood the PDG to be a
group of like-minded democracies. The U.S. therefore
believes that the democratic character of countries applying
for membership should be an important factor in admissions
policy. At the same time, we recognize the inherent and
practical difficulties of reaching agreement among all
partners on an objective and credible set of democracy
indicators and applying them consistently -- and in a
compulsory manner -- to specific cases.
In consequence, it is the U.S. view that each member of the
PDG should formulate some set of standards for evaluating
applications for membership and, at its discretion, exercise
its right to veto countries that do not meet these standards.
The U.S. believes the following democracy guidelines would
be useful in evaluating membership requests to protect the
'like-minded' nature of the Partnership. The U.S. also
believes that a coordinated set of guidelines among partners
would minimize disagreements and the necessity of any
partners to break consensus. We believe that all PDG members
should base their membership decisions on similar standards.
-- A "free ranking" from Freedom House
-- A score of 50 percent or higher in the World Bank's Voice
and Accountability Index
-- Practical experience in establishing legitimate,
effective, and accountable democratic institutions that would
help the PDG to achieve its objectives.
Eligibility Standards for Assistance: The United States has
also conceived the principal, if not exclusive, aim of the
PDG to be helping emerging democracies to improve their
governance capacity and service delivery to their citizens.
We recognize, of course, that the definition of emerging
democracies should be sufficiently flexible to reflect the
reality that democratic transitions are often protracted and
incomplete, and that some fragile and post-conflict states
need assistance in strengthening governing institutions, even
if they are not yet exemplars of democratic practices, to
successfully get on a democratic path.
Although there is agreement that governments of any country
on the OECD DAC list of Official Development Assistance
recipients can contact the PDG for advice or assistance,
whether to approve such requests will require a
recommendation from the Advisory Unit and a separate decision
by the Steering Group under the rules of consensus. As with
the case of membership, the United States does not seek
formal agreement among PDG members on democratic guidelines
for the assistance selection process. However, the U.S.
will observe the following guidelines in making these
decisions within the Steering Group and again believes that
close coordination in partners' decision-making will be
important for the success of the PDG. We, therefore,
encourage other PDG Partners to adopt similar guidelines.
-- Countries seeking assistance from the PDG must be willing
to accept stringent provisions for assuring accountability,
auditing, monitoring, transparency and open citizen feedback
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AU BR CA CI EAID ET JA KDEM KS MX NL NZ PL PO
PREL, TU, UK, OAS, DA, OECD
SUBJECT: STEERING GROUP NON-PAPER FOR THE PARTNERSHIP FOR
DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE (PD
in the implementation of the PDG-sponsored projects, based on
best practices developed by the Advisory Unit.
-- Applications for assistance should take into account a
candidate's performance on Freedom House scores based on
civil and political liberties and the World Bank's indicators
of voice and accountability, government effectiveness, rule
of law, and control of corruption.
-- There should be a strong presumption of denial, with
exceptions made on a case-by-case basis, for requests for PDG
services from any country that received a Freedom House
ranking of "not free" and a score of under 50 percent in the
World Bank's Voice and Accountability Index.
Conclusion: The United States believes that the approaches
laid out above strike the right balance between two competing
desiderata: preserving the flexibility of the Partnership to
make politically sensitive decisions taking into account the
special circumstances of individual cases, and maintaining
the democratic character and purposes of the Partnership's
membership and operations. In the spirit of partnership, the
United States would welcome the views of our PDG partners on
the guidelines set out above -- or others that might be
usefully applied to our decision-making process in the PDG --
and hope we will be able to achieve consensus on a way
forward.
¶6. (SBU) Points of Contact: Comments on the non-paper should
be provided directly via e-mail to EEB/EPPD Nancy
Smith-Nissley (Smith-NissleyN(at)state.gov) and EEB/ODF
Christine Harbaugh (HarbaughCM(at)state.gov) copying S/P
members Dick Sokolsky (SokolskyRD@state.gov) and Jean Geran
(GeranJM(at)state.gov).
RICE