

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 04OTTAWA3431, SUMMIT AGENDA ON COMMON PROSPERITY: THOUGHTS ON
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04OTTAWA3431.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
04OTTAWA3431 | 2004-12-21 21:35 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 003431
SIPDIS
STATE FOR WHA/CAN:TBREESE, AHOLST; EB/TPP/BTA/EWH:AARON
WHITE HOUSE/NSC FOR FARYAR SHIRZAD
STATE PASS USTR FOR SAGE CHANDLER
USDOC FOR 4320/OFFICE OF NAFTA/GWORD/TFOX; 3134/OIO/WESTERN
HEMISPHERE
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD CA
SUBJECT: SUMMIT AGENDA ON COMMON PROSPERITY: THOUGHTS ON
NEXT STEPS ON THE REGULATORY FRONT
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: AT THE BILATERAL SUMMIT ON NOVEMBER 30,
2004, THE PRESIDENT AND CANADIAN PM PAUL MARTIN AGREED TO AN
AGENDA FOR "COMMON SECURITY, COMMON PROSPERITY" THAT
COMMITTED THE TWO SIDES TO "PURSUE JOINT APPROACHES TO
PARTNERSHIPS, CONSENSUS STANDARDS, AND SMARTER REGULATIONS
THAT RESULT IN GREATER EFFICIENCY AND COMPETITIVENESS, WHILE
ENHANCING THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF OUR CITIZENS". WE
UNDERSTAND THAT DISCUSSIONS ARE ALREADY UNDERWAY AMONG
CAPITALS ABOUT HOW TO MOVE FORWARD ON THIS COMMITMENT.
¶2. (SBU) CANADIAN INTEREST IN THIS AGENDA PROBABLY STEMS
FROM THE RELEASE OF THE "SMART REGULATION" REPORT, WHICH
MADE IT CLEAR THAT NORTH AMERICAN STANDARDS AND REGULATORY
REGIMES SHOULD BE A PRIORITY FOR CANADIAN REGULATORS. WE
BELIEVE THAT THE COMBINATION OF A BILATERAL COMMITMENT TO
JOINT APPROACHES AND GOC CONSIDERATION OF THE SMART
REGULATION AGENDA PRESENTS AN OPPORTUNITY TO DEVELOP A
PROCESS THAT CAN EVENTUALLY REDUCE REGULATORY DIVERGENCE -
THE "TYRANNY OF SMALL DIFFERENCES" THAT INHIBITS TRADE AND
REDUCES CONSUMER CHOICE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER. THIS
CABLE DESCRIBES THE "SMART REGULATION" INITIATIVE AND
OUTLINES OUR IDEAS FOR MOVING TOWARD MORE LONG-TERM, BROAD-
BASED REGULATORY COOPERATION. END SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION: THE SMART REGULATION INITIATIVE
---------------------------------------------
¶2. (U) FOR CANADA, THE BENEFITS OF NAFTA HAVE BEEN CLEAR,
INCLUDING THE DOUBLING OF TRADE THAT IS NOW STRAINING BORDER
INFRASTRUCTURE. FURTHER GROWTH, HOWEVER, WHILE LIKELY, WILL
BE CONSTRAINED BOTH BY BORDER INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITATIONS,
WHICH ARE BEING ADDRESSED IN THE SMART BORDER PROCESS, AND
BY REGULATORY DIFFERENCES WHICH CONTINUE TO IMPEDE ENTRY OF
NEW PRODUCTS INTO THE MARKET AND LIMIT CONSUMER CHOICE.
3.(U) CANADA HAS JUST COMPLETED A THOROUGH STAKEHOLDER
REVIEW OF ITS REGULATORY PROCESSES AND STRUCTURE. THE
CANADIAN "EXTERNAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SMART REGULATION",
CONVENED IN 2003, RELEASED ITS FINAL REPORT IN SEPTEMBER
¶2004. THE COMMITTEE OBSERVED THAT ".CANADA AND THE UNITED
STATES MAINTAIN PARALLEL PROCESSES AND STRUCTURES ACROSS
ALMOST ALL AREAS OF REGULATORY ACTIVITY. THEIR TWO SETS OF
PROCESSES REFLECT A CONVERGENCE IN POLICY OBJECTIVES AND
REGULATORY PROCEDURES. HOWEVER, MUCH OF THIS WORK IS
DUPLICATIVE, PARTICULARLY GIVEN THE INTEGRATED NORTH
AMERICAN MARKET. THE OUTCOME CAN BE POOR REGULATORY AND
ECONOMIC RESULTS AND HIGHER COSTS FOR GOVERNMENTS, CONSUMERS
AND BUSINESSES."
4.(U) THE COMMITTEE MADE THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS,
AMONG OTHERS:
--THE GOC SHOULD INCLUDE INTERNATIONAL REGULATORY
COOPERATION AS A DISTINCT OBJECTIVE OF CANADIAN FOREIGN
POLICY, WITH A PRIMARY AND IMMEDIATE FOCUS ON NORTH AMERICA,
AND DEVELOP AN AGENDA FOR NORTH AMERICAN REGULATORY
COOPERATION.
--CANADA-SPECIFIC REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SHOULD DIFFER FROM
INTERNATIONAL OR NORTH AMERICAN MODELS ONLY WHERE THERE ARE
IMPORTANT NATIONAL PRIORITIES, UNIQUE CANADIAN CONDITIONS OR
CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, OR EXISTING MODELS ARE INADEQUATE TO
CANADIAN POLICY OBJECTIVES;
--CANADA SHOULD PROMOTE JOINT PRODUCT REVIEWS AND MOVE
TOWARD ACCEPTING U.S. AND EU PRODUCT APPROVALS IN SECTORS
WITH WELL-ESTABLISHED CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES;
--CANADA SHOULD STRENGTHEN INTERAGENCY REGULATORY
COORDINATION AND DEVELOP OVERARCHING REGULATORY POLICY
FRAMEWORKS FOR KEY SECTORS.
IN ORDER TO PUT THESE RECOMMENDATIONS INTO OPERATION, THE
COMMITTEE PROPOSED THAT THE GOC FORM MULTISTAKEHOLDER "SWAT
TEAMS" TO IDENTIFY TROUBLESOME REGULATORY DIFFERENCES AND
PROPOSE SOLUTIONS. THE COMMITTEE IDENTIFIED AS PRIORITY
AREAS:
--MANUFACTURING/PRODUCT APPROVAL;
--BIOTECHNOLOGY/LIFE SCIENCES;
--ENABLING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR FIRST NATIONS;
--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESSES; AND
--OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT.
(THE FULL REPORT IS AVAILABLE AT
HTTP://WWW.SMARTREGULATION.GC.CA)
A "SMART" NORTH AMERICAN PROCESS?
---------------------------------
5.(SBU) We suggest that, in the context of our commitments
in the November 30 statement, Washington agencies think
about developing a broad-based bilateral or trilateral
review of regulations that draws on these recommendations.
While such a process could yield short-term deliverables,
more importantly, it would set the stage for real progress
in finding and eliminating a broader list of longstanding
regulatory barriers than the NAI process has addressed so
far.
BRINGING REGULATORY EXPERTS TOGETHER
------------------------------------
6.(SBU) In our view, the logical first step would be to
develop channels of communication between the regulatory
oversight bodies, OMB and the GoC Privy Council Office (PCO)
to exchange information on regulatory initiatives underway,
set compatible timetables where possible and review existing
regulations to identify areas for revision, or areas where
we could negotiate mutual recognition agreements. U.S.
officials could also share experience on strengthening
regulatory oversight and interagency coordination, a key
recommendation of the Smart Regulation report.
7.(SBU) The agenda for these exchanges could include review
of existing promising models, such as the joint PMRA and EPA
pesticide review process, and a look at sectors identified
in the Smart Regulation report and previous NAI discussions.
These could include some aspects of drug approvals,
processed food containers, and federal/state/provincial
regulatory requirements for construction products.
INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS
----------------------
8.(SBU) Second, Washington agencies may also want to
explore how to involve business and other stakeholders.
Options include expanding the Canadian approach to convene
North American "SWAT teams" of government, industry and
consumer representatives that review regulatory issues by
sector and report back to governments. Another model might
be a North American equivalent of the "Transatlantic
Business Dialogue (TABD)" which effectively articulated
business priorities for US-EU regulatory cooperation in the
1990s.
9.(SBU) Alternatively, or in parallel, both (or all three)
governments could encourage maximum participation by
stakeholders in the "smart regulation" process within
Canada. The Committee urged the GoC to designate a Minister
to invite interested stakeholders to identify those
regulatory differences for which elimination would not
impede Canadian social (including health and safety) and
environmental objectives. In any case, we should ensure that
the USG and the U.S. private sector participate in this
process as stakeholders and make recommendations by June
¶2005.
TIMETABLE AND DELIVERABLES
--------------------------
10.(SBU) Under this framework we could call on regulatory
officials to reach certain objectives within twelve months,
to serve as deliverables at a future NAFTA Summit or meeting
of the New Partnership in North America. Examples of twelve-
month deliverables include:
--Swat Team Reports: Stakeholder groups or "Swat Teams"
issue reports on priority list of regulatory differences to
address via harmonization or mutual recognition. Such a
list could include both bilateral and trilateral priorities,
depending on feasibility.
--Regulatory oversight bodies: OMB and PCO develop mechanism
for consulting on new regulatory projects, decision
mechanism for selecting regulations for parallel
consideration or MRAs. (e.g. applying EPA/PMRA pesticide
model to other agencies)
--Joint approvals: Independent agencies develop consultation
process for joint approvals. Example: CFIA and USDA could
look into simultaneous approval processes for new seed
varieties.
--Initiation of joint reviews: An 18-month deliverable could
be announcement/Federal Register/Gazette notices of first
joint reviews of regulations in priority sectors.
11.(SBU) Such a framework would be a long-term investment
in addition to an effort to identify "low-hanging fruit" in
the regulatory sphere, although such a broad-based process
might bring to light additional areas where early results
are possible beyond those already identified in NAI
discussions. Post (Econ and FCS) would be prepared to
support the process by working intensively with local U.S.
and Canadian business contacts and regulators, DOC, and USTR
to identify possible items for short, medium and long-term
work programs across a number of sectors.