

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA800, TAKING STOCK OF U.S.-CANADIAN RELATIONS -- AN END
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA800.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA800 | 2005-03-17 15:17 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
171517Z Mar 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000800
SIPDIS
E.O.12958: N/A
TAGS: ASEC ECON OPRC PREL CA
SUBJECT: TAKING STOCK OF U.S.-CANADIAN RELATIONS -- AN END
OF TOUR ASSESSMENT
U.S.-Canadian Relations
-----------------------
¶1. My core message as I depart Ottawa is that our
relationship with Canada has changed fundamentally in the
last four years, and we as a government need to catch up
with this new reality. Canada is the front line of our
efforts to protect the U.S. homeland. There is no priority
in the hemisphere, in the world greater than that, and we
will have to make sure that we are properly set up in Canada
to address this priority.
¶2. The complexity of U.S.-Canadian ties, and of Canada's
internal political and social reality, has played out
visibly during my four-year tenure here. When I arrived,
Jean Chretien was in his third term as Prime Minister and
Canada was in the process of disengaging from its former
middle power status and withdrawing from the global stage.
The bruising debate over Quebec separatism was largely over
but the fissures it left in the country had not healed, and
there was extreme caution in political decision-making.
More recently, Chretien's replacement by Paul Martin,
followed by elections which yielded a minority government,
further restricted bold initiatives. U.S. Canadian
relations during this period were complicated, with
increasing economic integration and strong support in the
immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, but also growing
negative reactions to festering trade disputes such as BSE
and softwood lumber, and strong popular disagreement over
the U.S. operation in Iraq.
¶3. Mission Canada has made broad strides over the past four
years to strengthen all areas of the bilateral relationship,
but most significantly in the realm of security, as
manifested specifically by the Smart Border Action Plan and
our daily support to implementing the programs and providing
support to those in Washington pushing our policy agenda
related to the plan. We have also helped prod Canada to
increase defense spending and have improved our cooperation
on multilateral issues such as human rights, trafficking in
persons, and curtailing the spread of weapons of mass
destruction. We did come up short on missile defense and
military support for Iraq, but Canada has compensated in
part by managing the international observer mission for
Iraqi elections, contributing 300 million dollars to Iraqi
reconstruction and supporting first Iraqi police training
and now NATO's Iraqi army training. On the economic side of
the relationship Mission Canada has supported the policy and
structural framework of deepening our economic ties. In
many ways we have reached the natural limits of the current
NAFTA-led construct, as "border risk" has become a major
theme of senior Canadian officials -- for instance, Toyota
decided to locate a new plant in the U.S. because of concern
with border crossings. There are two sets of issues --
those related to border processing and delays, and the
deeper issues related to failure to resolve trade disputes
such as softwood lumber and BSE.
The Ambassador's Role
---------------------
¶4. Overwhelmingly, the bilateral relationship occurs across
the U.S.-Canadian border between individuals, businesses and
communities who do not check in with Ottawa and Washington.
Even at the government-to-government level, a great deal of
interaction takes place directly between government
agencies. In this unique environment, I have found it
effective to assume a high profile in Canadian public
discourse for three key reasons.
¶5. First, we enjoy excellent working relations with the
Government of Canada, and Canadian government officials,
especially in law enforcement and the Canadian Forces, fully
understand our current concerns and issues. The same,
however, cannot be said of the Canadian public, especially
the media. Moreover, Canadian political leaders are often
reluctant to make the public case for close U.S.-Canada
cooperation on controversial issues -- missile defense being
the most recent case in point.
¶6. Secondly, while Canadians understand us better than
perhaps any other country, they don't understand us as well
as they think. Canadians have long described their public
discourse as a "dialogue of solitudes," in which they
largely listen to each other. Canada needs to hear from
Americans directly on our views, impending decisions, and
courses of action taken. There is no American in Canada in
a more authoritative position to communicate our views than
the Ambassador of the United States.
¶7. Finally, it has been necessary to interpret Canada and
to serve as a first alert for those in Washington who are
immersed on issues of interest in all other parts of the
world. Canada believes it has a hard time getting
Washington's attention. This sometimes occurs through our
own indecision but more often it is the result of our
inability to bring to closure issues that are relatively
small for us but that loom large for Canadians.
¶8. My public role has meant traveling widely throughout
this vast and diverse country. The fundamental message to
all audiences has been highlighting the scope, depth and
strength of the bilateral relationship; and emphasizing the
need for Canada and the U.S. to continue to work together to
ensure our mutual security and prosperity, across the globe
as well as on the North American continent we share. I have
been able to explain our views directly, at a retail level,
to a broad group of opinion leaders, including in civic and
business organizations, think tanks and universities. The
importance of our bilateral relationship has also ensured
that my remarks have received wide dissemination in the
Canadian media.
The Centrality of Public Diplomacy
----------------------------------
¶9. Obviously, our public diplomacy efforts here and
elsewhere need to include more than the Ambassador. We were
fortunate to have a steady stream of visitors from the
Executive Branch, including the President, who each time
helped advance our agenda and put forward the face of the
U.S. as partner and friend. Our few public diplomacy
program dollars consistently prove their worth as Canadians
who ought to know us better are predictable in their
surprise at our dynamism, our diversity, and our friendship.
Yes, even in Canada, exchanges, speaker and visitor programs
are invaluable, especially with the uniformly positive
reception for our outreach efforts in diaspora communities
of Haitians, Middle Easterners, and South Asians.
¶10. Through all of this, I do not accept the notion that
America and Canada are growing apart. But I do believe that
our economic ties and mutual prosperity could be greater,
our security enhanced, and Canada could take a more active
part in solving global problems, if we focused more
consistently on tending this relationship. Following are my
thoughts on where we need to engage Canada in the coming
years, and what I have learned about how best to do so.
A Checklist of Opportunities for Enhanced Bilateral
Engagement
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
--
¶11. There are a number of excellent opportunities to better
engage the Canadian government on global issues, economics,
and security in the coming years:
-- First, Canada is searching for a greater role to play in
the world and might be willing to commit more resources and
possibly even troops to the right missions, or might be
willing to lead certain international processes. There is
general embarrassment here over the slippage in Canada's
international position, and many Canadians would accept a
more assertive. We should quietly urge, and openly support
Canada to fully take stewardship of a hemispheric or
international problem such as Haiti.
-- Second, in the short-term we should continue to increase
our law enforcement and border engagement. We have achieved
substantial coordination with Canada in information sharing
and law enforcement liaison but need to continue to develop
our programs and increase personnel to ensure a seamless
flow of information and close operational coordination. We
also need to continue to develop the physical infrastructure
on the border to allow for faster and more secure movement
of goods and people. Specifically, we want to support the
new DHS staffing for the Container Security Initiative, but
find ourselves looking at reducing support staff at the same
time.
-- Third, over the long-term we should continue to pursue a
new framework for economic and security integration with
Canada and where possible with Mexico which will help solve
the two largest problems of border delays and business
costs. A package of policies that includes enhanced border
infrastructure (physical and technical), improved economic
productivity, and shared security measures would strengthen
security while expanding trade. If such a partnership is to
succeed, we need to see it as a source of real change in a
long-term, strategic framework, and not shy away from
addressing issues that may require legislative changes.
-- Fourth, we need more visitors. I have been surprised by
how little interest there is in Canada by the U.S. Congress.
This is unfortunate. We have excellent Executive Branch
Agency-to-Agency ties and strong State-Provincial contacts,
but the crucial middle link between the Congress and
Parliament is largely missing. It would help us on a number
of levels if we could increase the volume of U.S. Senators
and Representatives who are knowledgeable about Canada based
on their travel here. It would also help us immensely to
have more visits and exchanges on the crucial issue of
energy, which has similarly been shortchanged.
-- Fifth, we need to guard against the narrow protectionist
tendencies that are clouding this very beneficial trade
relationship. Allowing narrow interests in the U.S. to
dominate certain markets and issues, e.g. softwood lumber,
increases the cost of products to American consumers and
harms the larger economic relationship while also making it
more difficult for Canadian leaders to deliver on political
issues of concern to us. Canada wants to work with us to
solve trade disputes, but the legalistic path we have
pursued over the past several years has eroded Canadian
faith in NAFTA, and that erosion may have long-term costs
for us. We should explore ways to focus trade remedy
actions in a manner which yields resolution, whether we like
it or not.
The Fight for Resources
-----------------------
¶12. Protecting the 5,000 miles of American borders that we
share with Canada is Mission Canada's highest priority.
About 70 percent of our personnel resources are focused on
law enforcement and border security. Yet the financial
resources provided to us are clearly not commensurate with
the importance and needs of the goals we have outlined in
our Mission Performance Plan. As I depart Canada I leave
behind a major funding problem that threatens to unravel
much of the fine work we have accomplished since 9/11. Our
State Program funding target is equal to the target we had
two years ago even though the US dollar has depreciated
almost 30 percent. We have enacted extreme travel
restrictions, a hiring freeze and have squeezed savings out
of every aspect of our operations. Yet we are faced with
the strong likelihood of layoffs unless our funding level is
significantly increased.
To Watch For
------------
¶13. I have found that one other role of an Ambassador is to
sound an early warning to Washington on problems ahead. In
a relationship so large and integrated, there is a certain
sense of permanence to irritants. I remember when I first
did my briefings for Congressional testimony, these items
included Pacific salmon, PEI potatoes and acid rain. Now,
although the specific issues have changed, there is also a
new feature: time. The time it has been taking to attend
to these irritants seems to have been increasing. Neither
side has total wisdom in these disputes, but our broader
national interests have fallen victim to the concerns of an
isolated, small group seeking specific protection.
¶14. No better example of this exists than softwood lumber,
but there are also a couple of others on the horizon: BSE,
Devil's Lake. Their cost to our overall bilateral
relationship outweighs their potential and often narrow
benefit. Over time, these relatively minor irritants
fester, undercutting public support and undermining the
ability of political leadership to support our policies. We
need to recommit to solve disputes and not allow them to
drag on with no hope of resolution.
Closing
-------
¶15. It has been an honor and privilege to serve my country
these past four years. I have had but one consistent
message for people all over Canada which is that the United
States is a force for good around the world. I leave with
this unshakable belief.