

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09STATE120099, BLUE LANTERN OUTREACH TO CANADA: DISCUSSIONS WITH
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09STATE120099.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09STATE120099 | 2009-11-20 18:55 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Secretary of State |
VZCZCXRO5397
RR RUEHMT
DE RUEHC #0099/01 3270604
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 201855Z NOV 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0426-0429
RUEHMT/AMCONSUL MONTREAL 0043-0046
RUEHON/AMCONSUL TORONTO 0020-0023
INFO RHMCSUU/FBI WASHINGTON DC 7001-7004
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHINGTON DC 6078-6081
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUEPINS/HQ BICE INTEL WASHINGTON DC 0767-0770
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 STATE 120099
SENSITIVE
C O R R E C T E D C O P Y (SENSITIVE CAPTION ADDED)
SIPDIS
STATE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETTC KOMC CA
SUBJECT: BLUE LANTERN OUTREACH TO CANADA: DISCUSSIONS WITH
EMBASSY AND CONSULATES, GOC OFFICIALS, AND INDUSTRY
REF: 2006 BLUE LANTERN GUIDEBOOK
STATE 00120099 001.2 OF 004
¶1. (SBU) Summary: Representatives from the Bureau
of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Defense
Trade Controls Compliance (PM/DTCC) met October 13-16 with
Mission Canada staff in Montreal, Ottawa, and Toronto, GOC
officials, and local defense industry to discuss
the Blue Lantern end-use monitoring program and
related defense trade compliance issues. PM/DTCC reps
briefed
embassy and consular staff on implementing the
Blue Lantern program at post and shared results of
a research project involving U.S. companies'
use of the Canadian exemption to export defense articles
to Canada. Preliminaryresults of the research indicate as
many as 154 third party transfer violations involving U.S.
defense articles exported under the Canadian exemption; DTCC
team agreed to further consultations with ICE
attach office as additional results are obtained.
Team also conducted a Blue Lantern site visit
in Montreal to Unisource Technology, Inc., a private
company which provides ITAR-controlled defense articles
to National Defense Canada. Washington believes the
outreach visit achieved goals of improving GOC and industry
understanding of U.S. export control laws and regulations,
strengthening country team's knowledge of Blue Lantern
program, and enhancing DTCC's understanding of Canadian
defense industry and GOC export/import and technology
security procedures.
--------------------------------------------- ---
PURPOSE OF TRIP AND MEMBERS OF BLUE LANTERN TEAM
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶2. (U) Administered by the Office of Defense
Trade Controls Compliance (PM/DTCC) and pursuant
to the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), Blue
Lantern is a global program designed to verify
the end-use, end-users, and final disposition
of U.S. defense articles,
technology and services subject to the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).
This visit was part of ongoing PM/DTCC's efforts
to improve the effectiveness of Blue Lantern
through outreach visits with embassies, foreign
industry, and host governments. The DTCC Blue
Lantern team consisted of Research and Analysis
Division (RAD) Chief Ed Peartree and PM/DTCC/RAD
Compliance Specialists Kyle Ballard and Tim Mazzarelli.
--------------------------------------------- --------
MONTREAL CONSULATE TEAM BRIEF AND INDUSTRY SITE VISIT
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶3. (U) The Blue Lantern team briefed Political
Officer Peter Martin, Assistant ICE attach David Denton,
and Foreign Commercial Specialist Gina Bento on the
Department's program for end-use monitoring of defense
articles and services, guidelines for implementing the
program at post, and the importance of preventing the
unauthorized re-export and retransfer of U.S. defense
articles. Team also briefed participants on its research
project involving U.S. companies' use of the
Canadian exemption and Department's concern that the
exemption may be abused by certain parties to facilitate
illegal exports.
¶4. (U) Embassy Ottawa Economic Officer Lori
Balbi and Peter Martin accompanied Blue Lantern
team on a site visit to Unisource Technology, Inc.
(Unisource). Team met with Unisource President
& CEO Rudy Rutenberg, Executive Director Bruce
Rutenberg, and Contracts Administration Director
Cathy Jones. Unisource staff provided background
information on export requests and business operations,
as well as Unisource's physical security measures
STATE 00120099 002.2 OF 004
for handling sensitive U.S. defense articles.
Based on verification of order and documentation
establishing Canadian Armed Forces as final end user
and evidence of a long standing business relationship
with National Defense Canada, team was confident that
Unisource is a reliable recipient of USML items.
--------------------------------------------- --------------
OTTAWA CONSULATE TEAM AND GOC OFFICIALS BRIEF
--------------------------------------------- --------------
¶5. (U) Blue Lantern team PM/DTCC reps briefed Senior Case
Officer,
Controlled Goods Directorate (CGD), Public Works and
Government Services Canada, Serge Poirier and colleague
Mary Hyde on the Blue Lantern end-use monitoring
program. Team emphasized that Blue Lantern is not an
investigation
or law enforcement activity but rather a cooperative
program designed to improve security and integrity of
defense trade relationship between U.S. and international
partners.
6 (U) Poirier in turn provided a detailed
accounting of the CGD's compliance program including
Canada's SOP for registration of companies dealing in
strategic goods. According to Poirier, companies go
through a general vetting process which assesses a
firm's history and ownership. Registration lapses
after a five year period at which time the company
must re-justify/re-apply. During the five year
registration period companies must maintain all business
records and visitation logs, must internally vet all
employees, and are subject to inspection by the CGD.
Poirier noted that all registered companies will be
inspected at least once during the five year
registration period. Should inspections reveal
noncompliance, company registration can be suspended
or revoked. Problems that reveal possible criminal
violations are referred to the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police (RCMP).
¶7. (SBU) Blue Lantern team met with ICE attach
Craig Healy, Deputy ICE attach Bobby Fuentes, Assistant
ICE attach Spencer Schneider, ATF attach Bob Thomas,
and FBI Legal Attach Bob Doherty to discuss Blue Lantern
end-use monitoring and related defense trade issues.
ICE attach office was
familiar with the Blue Lantern program and is highly
focused on export-related cases. Healey noted that there
is strong cooperation at the working level with Canadian
Border Security Agency (CBSA) and the RCMP; less so at senior
levels where legal complications and obstacles to joint
cooperation arise.
¶8. (SBU) Canadian export controls enforcement
has traditionally been viewed mainly as a regulatory issue,
rather than as a criminal enforcement matter; this
according to Healy, is gradually changing. CBSA is Canada's
Customs
agency but has limited enforcement capability; RCMP is
the body that investigates potential criminal cases.
During the meeting it was noted that an obstacle in
the U.S.-CA law enforcement relationship is that
RCMP has a tendency to over-classify information, creating
barriers to information exchange. Furthermore, Canadian
laws on privacy inhibit the free exchange of information
regarding Canadian citizens, even among GOC agencies.
Healy noted, however, that with regard to Blue Lantern
requests information seems to flow more freely. ICE
will approach CBSA or RCMP to find out what they might
know about a Canadian company (subject of a Blue Lantern
check) and/or to share Department's concerns.
¶9. (SBU) PM/DTCC team met with CBSA Counterproliferation
Section Manager George Webb, RCMP Staff Sergeant,
Tim Ranger, and ICE attachs. Webb and Ranger described
their
respective agencies' missions and discussed shared agency
goals. Webb indicated that destination of an export is the
primary factor scrutinized by CBSA, and that they also
consider
the track record and reputation of exporters. The agency
does not have discretionary authority to ban a problematic
exporter (Comment: DTCC can place a company/entity under
STATE 00120099 003.2 OF 004
a "policy of denial" based on documented concerns, without
criminal indictment or conviction) without a
criminal conviction but can detain goods as long as the
agency deems
appropriate. The GOC is currently reviewing
counterproliferation
legislation that would further criminalize proliferation
activity,
and presumably expand their powers with regard to export
investigations. Webb also noted that CBSA has an "alert"
system similar to DTCC's Watch List that flags potentially
problematic entities.
¶10. (SBU) DTCC discussed its research findings
from export filings citing the Canadian exemption
and noted that there were 154 instances of possible
exports (or re-exports) to third countries (Comment:
exports under the Canadian exemption are for end-use
in Canada only). Webb indicated that CBSA could
put an alert on the companies involved into their system.
Webb and Ranger noted that traditionally, both CBSA
and RCMP have been focused on in-bound shipments and
are only now becoming more focused on exports.
ICE attach Craig Healy suggested that a further avenue of
U.S.-Canada cooperation might include the creation of
an international task force that would bring
Canadian-U.S. DOJ prosecutors together to create pressure
at higher levels in support of export enforcement.
DTCC indicated that it would pass this information to
the U.S. DOJ, National Coordinator for Export Enforcement
Cases, Steve Pelak.
¶11. (U) Blue Lantern team also met with Canadian
Department of Foreign Affairs and International
Trade (DFAIT) Senior Export Control Officer
Lynne Sabatino to discuss the respective
features of Canadian and U.S. export controls.
Sabatino exhibited extensive knowledge of ITAR
regulations and provided a detailed
description of the Canadian export control review process.
Sabatino explained that DFAIT export controls cover
both munitions and dual-use commodities, and consider
Canadian foreign policy in addition to national security
and international regimes
when making export decisions. Sabatino noted
that all license permit applications are reviewed
by technical experts who pre-screen authorization
requests for licensing permit officers. She
also explained procedural features that are
incorporated into the permit process which act to
safeguard transactions involving USML items. For
example, applications for permits have fields
for "country of manufacture" and "U.S. content".
If the end-items for export are listed as including
any U.S. content, the system will automatically prompt
the license permit officer to demonstrate compliance
with U.S. law. In items that include USML, the
applicant is required to obtain U.S. re-export
authorization. The system, however, relies on the
applicant for full disclosure. The improper re-export
of USML (by either failing to note content or false
declaration) thus is not only a violation of U.S.
law but of Canadian law as well.
¶12. (U) Canada conducts "post audit"
checks via their overseas Embassies. Pre-
permit checks are conducted from Ottawa and
consist mostly of background research and analysis.
Audits are initiated based on a variety of factors
including commodity sensitivity and destination
and are conducted at the discretion of the
permit officer. Sabatino stressed that DFAIT is
committed to maintaining the Canadian exemption
and that Canada applies appropriate security
and control measures to ensure the safe handling of USML.
--------------------------------------------- ----
TORONTO CONSULATE TEAM BRIEF
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶13. (SBU) In Toronto, Blue Lantern team met with Economic
and Political Section Chief, Lee MacTaggart and ICE
attach John Ward. MacTaggart and Ward emphasized
that Toronto - given its status as a business center
and ethnically diverse community - is where the
majority of export enforcement cases arise within the
STATE 00120099 004.2 OF 004
province.
They indicated that, due to equal opportunity laws
in Canada, dual citizens are often not required
to present themselves as such, making it difficult
to monitor possible ITAR violations involving
foreign nationals. MacTaggart also noted that
Canadian companies commonly establish post office
boxes in the United States through which they could receive
shipments, further complicating ITAR enforcement.
¶14. (SBU) Ward echoed many of the sentiments expressed
by ICE Ottawa indicating that at the working level,
the relationship between U.S. law enforcement and
the CBSA/RCMP is good but becomes less cooperative
at higher levels. MacTaggart indicated that a
possible avenue for better U.S.-CA enforcement
cooperation is through DFAIT, as the agency's
international trade component is the
"center of gravity" given its strong interest
in preserving positive U.S.-CA trade relations
and maintaining special status as it relates to the
Canadian exemption. DTCC team
briefed the preliminary results of
Canadian exemption research project, which had been
the basis for several recent Blue Lantern checks,
including an unfavorable check in Toronto. MacTaggart
requested information updates from Washington on
final disposition of Blue Lantern cases so that
Consulate team members can increase their own understanding of
local exporters and possible companies of concern
in the Toronto area.
¶15. (SBU) Comment: PM/DTCC Blue Lantern outreach
team found high interest and strong cooperation
from GOC officials and a motivated and well-informed
Mission Canada team with respect to the conduct
of Blue Lantern end-use monitoring.
The visit also appears to have met the
objectives of improving understanding of the
Blue Lantern end-use monitoring program and
USG munitions export laws and regulations. DTCC
team agreed to further consultations with ICE
attach office as additional results
are obtained regarding the use of the Canadian
exemption for license-free exports to Canada.
Outreach visit achieved goals of improving
industry's understanding of U.S. export control
laws and regulations, strengthening country
team's knowledge of Blue Lantern
program, and enhancing DTCC's understanding
of Canadian defense industry and GOC export/import
and technology security procedures.
¶16. (U) DTCC would like to express its gratitude
to Embassy Ottawa and Missions Montreal and Toronto,
and especially control officer Lori Balbi for
her assistance in arranging and executing this visit.
CLINTON