

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08SANJOSE71, RE-BUILDING BRIDGES IN COSTA RICA: A THREE-WAY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08SANJOSE71.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08SANJOSE71 | 2008-01-30 15:10 | 2011-03-21 16:30 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy San Jose |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0071/01 0301510
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 301510Z JAN 08
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHSJ/AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9392
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUMIAGH/COMJTF-B SIMS SOTO CANO HO
RHMFIUU/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000071
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR WHA/CEN, WHA/PPC, WHA/EPSC, PM AND EEB,
SOUTHCOM ALSO FOR FPA
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CS EAID MASS PGOV PREL
SUBJECT: RE-BUILDING BRIDGES IN COSTA RICA: A THREE-WAY
PARTNERSHIP
REF: A. SAN JOSE 003
¶B. SAN JOSE 1891 (NOTAL)
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: In an unusual three-way partnership, the
GOCR, the Costa Rican private sector and the U.S. military
have embarked on a campaign to replace key bridges damaged or
washed out by flooding in the heavy 2007 rainy season. Most
of the work will be undertaken by the National Emergency
Commission (CNE) and a new business group called "Businessmen
for Solidarity" (Empresarios Solidarios), which will combine
forces to replace as many as 30 short-span and culvert
bridges. The U.S. role, begun by a SOUTHCOM technical survey
in December, will be to help the GOCR erect as many as six
Bailey-type bridges. President Arias requested USG assistance
for the initiative. Following the successful medical
exercise last month (Ref A), this is another example of a new
Costa Rican willingness to welcome U.S. military humanitarian
assistance. END SUMMARY.
==================
A BAD RAINY SEASON
==================
¶2. (U) The 2007 rainy season (May-December) was particularly
heavy in Costa Rica, prompting the GOCR to declare a national
disaster in October. Communities in all seven provinces were
affected by flooding, which isolated communities, damaged
homes and infrastructure, and displaced thousands (Ref B). In
light of the disaster, the Embassy made available $50,000 in
OFDA disaster assistance for emergency supplies and fuel. In
mid-November, the CNE reported that some 18,000 people had
been affected overall, with 18 killed and nearly 2,900 left
homeless. The CNE initially estimated that 124 major
stretches of road and 29 bridges had been washed away or
severely damaged. Total damages at that time were estimated
at 35 billion colones ($70 million). As revised information
became available, the CNE later raised the tally to 135-160
bridges and culverts washed out or damaged nationwide.
Infrastructure damage was so extensive, in fact, that one of
the first tangible results of Costa Rica,s newly-established
diplomatic relations with China was $20 million in disaster
relief funding from Beijing, delivered in mid-December, which
will go towards housing reconstruction (septel).
==============================
THE PRIVATE SECTOR MOVES FIRST
==============================
¶3. (SBU) To address the infrastructure reconstruction needs
and to highlight the Costa Rican private sector,s sense of
corporate responsibility, a group of firms joined forces to
help with the post-flooding reconstruction. Calling
themselves Empresarios Solidarios (Businessmen for
Solidarity), the loose consortium was drawn from financial,
engineering, construction, and media firms under the informal
leadership of Grupo Nacion, which owns the nation,s leading
newspaper. The group,s ambitious initial plan, as briefed
to the Ambassador and Emboffs on October 29, was to raise USD
1 million to rebuild eight bridges leading to isolated
communities around the nation. The group deliberately
targeted not only areas in need, but also zones which had
voted against CAFTA during the October 2007 national
referendum. The group also sought to distance itself from
the GOCR, partially because the businessmen believed they
could work faster than the government, and partly because
they wanted to ensure the private sector received due credit.
The preliminary USG role, according to the Empresarios,
would be to help locate, deliver or supply Bailey or ACROW
bridging material.
======================
THE GOCR ASKS FOR HELP
======================
¶4. (SBU) Through November and December, Emboffs were invited
to join the weekly planning meetings of the Empresarios
group. The ODR Chief and his staff, as well as Pol/C and
Poloffs, participated. Our first objective was GOCR support
for the bridges plan, which would help facilitate any formal
request for assistance. In a letter from President Arias to
the Ambassador on November 5 (copy sent to WHA/CEN and
SOUTHCOM), we received both. Arias,s letter expressed
satisfaction with and gratitude for the Empresarios,
initiative, and asked for any assistance the USG could
provide. Following a late-November call from the Ambassador
to SOUTHCOM (Adm. Stavrides), SOUTHCOM and Post ODR staff
began considering specific ways the USG could help.
=================
REFINING THE PLAN
=================
¶5. (SBU) Our second objective was to persuade the Empresarios
to coordinate with the CNE to ensure that any private sector
bridge reconstruction meshed with national needs. Despite
the group,s initial reluctance to work with the GOCR, they
quickly realized that CNE expertise and cooperation would be
essential. As the weekly meetings continued (with CNE
involvement), the Empresarios, plan was refined. The group
would target communities in need, financing and building
bridges which had been washed out by the rain (and not
structures the Ministry of Transport planned to improve or
replace at some point.) The group hoped the bridges would be
just the first step in a long-term private sector commitment
to infrastructure improvement.
¶6. (U) By the end of November, the CNE and the Empresarios
had agreed to work first on a list of 15 priority short-span
(less than 15 meters in length) bridges. All would be
constructed using local materials (concrete) and local labor.
The total cost was projected to be over USD 1 million,
exhausting what the business group had collected to that
point. The group planned to approach additional companies
(including some U.S. multinationals) for additional
contributions. The Empresarios (wisely) postponed their
original plans to spend money on a few, more impressive (but
far more costly) longer-span structures.
=================
SOUTHCOM RESPONDS
=================
¶7. (SBU) Our third objective was to focus and refine the USG
role. Initially, the Empresarios group had inflated
expectations about what the U.S. could provide, and how
quickly. By early December, we had re-shaped the potential
USG role to a realistic four components: a) survey the
longer-span bridge sites the CNE had already identified, b)
provide technical assistance to the CNE to erect replacement
Bailey- or ACROW-type bridges, c) actually erect a Bailey- or
ACROW-type bridge, using a deployed U.S. military unit, and
d) if necessary in the future, help locate, find the best
price and help arrange transportation for additional Bailey
or ACROW bridging materials, to be funded by the Empresarios
group. At an Embassy-hosted meeting on December 10, the CNE
and Empresarios agreed to this approach.
¶8. (U) December 17-21, a two-member engineering team from
SOUTHCOM (an Army engineer and a Navy Seabee) joined CNE
engineers and PolOff on a survey of six longer-span bridging
sites which may be candidates for USG technical assistance.
The six sites spanned the length and breadth of Costa Rica,
from the central Pacific to the central Caribbean, and from
the central south to near the Nicaraguan border, covering
parts of Puntarenas, Heredia and Guanacaste provinces and the
canton of Perez Zeledon. The engineers also inspected stored
bridging materials, to ensure that what was assigned to each
site would indeed function there.
¶9. (U) As a result of the team,s four-day, 800-mile
circuit, the U.S. engineers were able to identify and
recommend alternative sites for two of the
six bridges, as well as additional engineering work to be
performed at all sites, such as new abutments, box culverts
and improved access. The U.S. team also recommended raising
some bridges to
above flood level, to avoid future problems. Finally, one
bridge
was identified as being in need of maintenance and
improvements, but not of complete replacement. The CNE
director and his engineering staff agreed with and welcomed
the recommendations.
==========
NEXT STEPS
==========
¶10. (U) The Empresarios Group is to resume regular meetings
this month, with an eye to launching its initiative (and the
first one or two short-bridge construction projects) at the
end of January. For the longer-span bridges, the SOUTHCOM
survey team will identify U.S. units (e.g., from Ft. Leonard
Woord, the Army Corps of Engineers, the 416th Engineering
Company or a USN SeaBee unit) that could deploy a small team
to provide subject matter expertise to help the CNE erect new
ACROW- or Bailey-type bridges, using materials the CNE
already has on hand. The CNE must first complete its
planning, which includes preparing the bridging site(s). The
first U.S.-assisted bridge site could be the 32 meter gap
across the Pacuar River, in Perez Zeledon canton (N 09 22,
29.7" x W 084 01, 21.9"), at the end of March, if the GOCR
completes the site preparations in time.
=======
COMMENT
=======
¶11. (SBU) What began as an effort to highlight corporate
responsibility following the hard-fought CAFTA referendum has
become another opportunity to display USG "soft power" on
Costa Rica. The businessmen deserve credit for launching
this unusual initiative and for obtaining the letter from
President Arias. The CNE deserves kudos for being receptive
to the private sector assistance. Our goal is
capacity-building, not doing everything for the Ticos, and
the GOCR (and the Empresarios) seem to agree. Even if the
ambitious private sector plan slows, the U.S. military has an
important, high-impact (and low-cost) role to play in
providing technical assistance. Our thanks to SOUTHCOM and
the units involved for responding so quickly to this
opportunity.
BRENNAN