

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06MEXICO3907, LOOKING FOR FRAUD IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES?
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06MEXICO3907.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06MEXICO3907 | 2006-07-14 18:01 | 2011-04-06 19:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Mexico |
Appears in these articles: http://wikileaks.jornada.com.mx/notas/fe-ciega-de-washington-en-el-ife |
VZCZCXRO9440
RR RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #3907/01 1951801
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 141801Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2159
INFO RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO COLLECTIVE
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 1207
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RHMFISS/CDR USNORTHCOM
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
71437
2006-07-14 18:01:00
06MEXICO3907
Embassy Mexico
CONFIDENTIAL
06MEXICO3834
VZCZCXRO9440
RR RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #3907/01 1951801
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 141801Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2159
INFO RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO COLLECTIVE
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 1207
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RHMFISS/CDR USNORTHCOM
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
TAGS: PGOV PINR PREL MX
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 MEXICO 003907
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/13/2016
TAGS: PGOV PINR PREL MX
SUBJECT: LOOKING FOR FRAUD IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES?
REF: A. A) MEXICO 3834
¶B. B) MEXICO 3422
Classified By: ACTING POLITICAL CHIEF ALAN MELTZER, REASONS: 1.4(B/D).
¶1. (C) Summary: In a July 12 meeting with poloffs,
officials of the Federal Electoral Institute (IFE) offered an
impassioned defense of their work in conducting the July 2
presidential elections. Although they had not yet seen the
specific complaints submitted by the PRD (or, for that
matter, those of the PAN), they described in great detail the
safeguards incorporated into IFE's election process, many of
which were previously described at an SRE briefing for the
diplomatic corps (ref A). They refuted in detail several of
the specific allegations of fraud or irregularities singled
out by Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO) in recent news
conferences. On July 13 we met with former IFE head Jose
Woldenberg, who opined that the election appeared to have
been conducted with complete transparency. He doubted AMLO's
allegations of widespread fraud, insisting that the dispute
simply reflected the understandable frustration felt by the
second place candidate in a very narrow race. He predicted
that the likeliest resolution would be that the electoral
tribunal (TEPJF) would order a partial recount of ballots,
and that he expected such a recount to confirm Calderon's
victory. Both contacts deeply lamented the damage that the
allegations of fraud were doing to IFE's hard-won
credibility. End summary.
¶2. (SBU) On July 12, poloffs met with IFE Counselor
Alejandra Latapi and IFE Director for International Affairs
Manuel Carrillo to discuss the most recent developments in
the dispute over the results of the Mexican presidential
election. From the outset of our meeting, Latapi asserted
that the election had been exemplary and that in several
important respects, the electoral system functioned even more
effectively this year than in previous years. She noted, for
example, that out of the over 130,000 precincts planned
nationwide, all but 11 actually operated on Election Day,
including every precinct planned for the conflictive state of
Chiapas; in 2000, IFE was unable to set up 104 of the
precincts planned nationwide.
Seeking to Set the Record Straight
----------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) In addition to detailing the considerable
safeguards protecting virtually every step of the election
process, she sought to refute several of the specific
allegations raised by AMLO in recent press conferences. She
first sought to rebut AMLO's allegation, based upon a video
he showed at a recent press conference, that ballot box
stuffing had occurred in the state of Guanajuato. She
explained that the person seen in the video depositing
multiple ballots in a ballot box -- who in fact was the
precinct president -- was simply relocating to the correct
box Chamber of Deputies ballots that inadvertently had been
deposited in the presidential ballot box. She noted that
such an action was legal and that all of the party
representatives -- including that of the PRD -- were aware of
the action at the time and did not object. (Note: AMLO
subsequently asserted that the PRD precinct representative
may have been bought off by the PAN, a charge strenuously
denied by the 19 year old woman who volunteered as his
representative in that precinct. End note.)
¶4. (SBU) As for AMLO's allegation that a discrepancy in the
tally sheet of a ballot box in Queretaro cost him votes,
Latapi said this discrepancy had been raised during the
district retabulation, the ballot box had been opened, the
votes recounted, and the discrepancy corrected. She noted
this was precisely the reason why the electoral law provided
for a district retabulation, and was an example of the system
working properly. She also sought to refute an allegation of
fraud in Coahuila, where the PRD identified a temporary IFE
employee claiming to have been pressured to change vote
tallies to Calderon's advantage, and to have seen Calderon's
vote totals grow immediately after an alleged power outage.
Latapi said that upon investigation, IFE found numerous
contradictions in his story. Rather than being hired as a
"capturista" to enter vote totals in the IFE data base, as he
had claimed, he had been hired for manual labor; in the early
morning hours on election night, he was asked to briefly
assist the district council by recording results being
dictated for a second, unofficial vote tally. Members of the
MEXICO 00003907 002 OF 003
district council, as well as representatives of four
political parties, certified that he never had access to the
official tally sheets and that there had been no power outage
during the evening.
¶5. (SBU) Finally, Latapi addressed the PRD's charge that IFE
had improperly opened ballot boxes being stored under
military guard in Tabasco, Puebla and Sonora. She asserted
that the electoral law did not preclude its reopening of
these ballot boxes, that they were reopened (and later
resealed) in the presence of the IFE district council and
party representatives, and that IFE had ordered them to be
opened because the PRD (and in some cases, the PAN) had
requested copies of tally sheets and incident reports therein
so as to be able to prepare its electoral challenge. She
emphasized that in no case did the district councils open the
sealed envelopes containing the executed ballots. (Note:
Former IFE President Jose Woldenberg told poloff that
although he believed IFE acted in good faith in opening the
ballot boxes, IFE would have been well-advised not to do so
without a court order, given the toxic, post-election
climate. In fact, late on July 12, IFE announced it would
not open additional further ballot boxes pending a TEPJF
order. End note.)
Allegations of Fraud May Undermine Electoral System
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶6. (C) Lapati told poloffs that her greatest concern was
that the recent allegations of electoral fraud risked
undermining citizen management of elections, which is the
very foundation of the Mexican electoral system. She
reminded us that each voting precinct is staffed by four
randomly selected and trained citizens, who were responsible
not only for checking voters' credentials and administering
the voting process but also for counting the votes. Because
the electoral framework was based on the principle that the
votes should be counted by citizens, rather than by civil
servants, the law authorized recounts only in the case of an
inconsistency or apparent error. She feared that the recent
allegations of electoral fraud would undermine public trust
in this citizen-based system, and was also concerned that
electoral workers could be harassed in their communities,
making it difficult to recruit volunteers in the future. She
also noted that PRD demands that IFE district councils
recount the votes in every ballot box were inconsistent with
TEPJF jurisprudence. The TEPJF has previously annulled lower
level elections where numerous ballot boxes had been
recounted without the legal criteria being met; in order to
avoid risking the annulment of this election, IFE had issued
strict instructions to recount votes only where the statutory
criteria were met.
Woldenberg Sees No Evidence of Widespread Fraud
--------------------------------------------- --
¶7. (C) Former IFE head and well-respected commentator Jose
Woldenberg told us that while errors undoubtedly had been
made in the vote count, he is aware of no evidence of an
organized plan to commit election fraud. Indeed, he believes
a widespread conspiracy to commit fraud would be impossible
given IFE's numerous safeguards. He characterized as
"fantasy" the PRD's allegation that the IFE's preliminary
count (PREP) software contained an algorithm that deducted
votes from AMLO, noting that every element of data entered
into the PREP could be corroborated against vote totals on
the tally sheets. He thought that overall, IFE had conducted
the elections very well and that in fact, there were few
differences between the way it conducted this year's election
and the way it conducted the 2000 election. The only
significant differences were that this year, the IFE adopted
stricter standards for incorporating vote totals into the
PREP, meaning that more precincts were excluded from the PREP
for closer examination by the district councils, and that in
2000 IFE had decided it would release the results of its
quick count on election night no matter how narrow the margin
between the candidates.
¶8. (C) Woldenberg's biggest concern over the present
situation is the damage unnecessarily being done to IFE's
reputation by what he considers unfounded allegations of
fraud. He noted that it had taken years for Mexico to
establish a credible electoral system and that no matter how
the TEPJF resolves the present dispute, a core of AMLO true
believers -- he called them a "community of faith" -- will
MEXICO 00003907 003 OF 003
always be convinced that IFE orchestrated or abetted fraud.
What's Next???
--------------
¶9. (C) Woldenberg sees the present situation playing out in
one of three possible scenarios. The most likely is that the
TEPJF -- perhaps after ordering a partial recount -- will
confirm Calderon as the winner; he doubts the TEPJF would
order a complete, nationwide recount. The second scenario,
which he considers highly improbable, is that a partial or
total recount would reverse the election results, resulting
in AMLO's election. The third scenario, which he also
considers highly improbable, is that the TEPJF would annul
the entire election. (Note: As we have previously reported
(ref B), TEPJF magistrates told poloffs several weeks before
the election that they would be very reluctant to annul the
entire election. End note.)
¶10. (C) Woldenberg believes that however the TEPJF rules,
its decision would soon end the stand-off. Assuming the
TEPJF confirms Calderon as President, AMLO's base of support
would quickly dwindle, although he might manage to convoke
one or two post-TEPJF demonstrations. He argued that the PRD
was essentially a party of "institutionality" with a great
deal invested in the system, particularly now that it has
emerged as the second force in Congress. He concluded that
it had a great deal to lose if it continued to press its case
extra-institutionally, and that much of the support AMLO
retains in the party hierarchy would melt away as senior PRD
office holders sought to protect their own interests.
Comment: AMLO Playing the Wrong Card?
--------------------------------------
¶11. (C) Frankly, in focusing on fraud where little or none
likely exists, AMLO not only is damaging one of Mexico's most
credible political institutions, but he may be undermining
the small chance he has of reversing the electoral results.
While we have seen no credible evidence of fraud, there is
some evidence that the incidence of human error was greater
in his strongholds, presumably because the level of education
in those regions tends to be lower: among the more than 2.5
million votes excluded from the PREP but included in the
final results (ref A), AMLO appears to have out-polled
Calderon by some 150,000 votes. Although we highly doubt a
recount would find enough errors to overcome Calderon's
current 243,000 lead, we suspect he is more likely to find
significant errors than significant fraud. For over 10
years, AMLO has advanced his political career in part by
knowing how to take political advantage of situations in
which he has been wronged. In the present case, however, his
tendency to consider himself the victim of a conspiracy may
turn out to be his Achilles heel.
Visit Mexico City's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/mexicocity
GARZA