

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 03OTTAWA2436, CANADA'S VISA ISSUING PROCESS
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03OTTAWA2436.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
03OTTAWA2436 | 2003-08-26 17:44 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 002436
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CA CVIS PGOV PREL PTER SMIG
SUBJECT: CANADA'S VISA ISSUING PROCESS
¶1. (U) (Summary) Canada,s visa issuing process closely
resembles that of the United States. There exist, however, a
number of structural and procedural differences between the
two countries. In general, the United States tends to have
stronger security measures in place and rejects a higher
percentage of its applicants than does Canada. In the last
few years, Canada has taken a few steps to improve its visa
issuing process, but a number of additional actions are
needed to bring its practices in line with U.S. standards.
(End summary)
---------------------------------
The Structure and Staffing of CIC
---------------------------------
¶2. (U) Poloff met recently with Keith Carter, Director of
Citizenship and Immigration Canada's (CIC) Western
Hemispheres Bureau, and received a broad overview of the
Canadian visa issuing process. Poloff also met separately
with H.G. Pardy, Director General of the Department of
Foreign Affairs and Trade's (DFAIT) Consular Affairs Bureau
and received additional information pertaining to Canadian
visa issues.
¶3. (U) According to Carter, Citizenship and Immigration
Canada (CIC) is the agency responsible for issuing both
immigrant and non-immigrant Canadian visas to citizens of
other countries. It was once a part of Canada,s Department
of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT), but broke
off to form its own agency in 1994 and currently employs
4,700 employees worldwide. DFAIT continues to maintain a
Bureau of Consular Affairs, but officers in this bureau do
not issue visas; rather they have the responsibility of
aiding Canadians abroad. They perform duties roughly
analogous to the American Citizen Services duties performed
by U.S. consular officers.
¶4. (U) There are relatively few Canadian posts that are
actually staffed and equipped to issue visas. There are, for
example, only 18 such posts in the Western Hemisphere and six
of these are located within the United States. CIC uses
these posts as hub-centers and applicants often have to
travel outside of their home countries to one of these
hub-centers to apply for visas. Carter explained that CIC
is experimenting with a drop-box system in which smaller
regional centers collect applications and forward them on,
without interviewing, to a hub-center for adjudication. To
illustrate, someone in El Salvador (a regional center) can
currently drop off his/her application in El Salvador and it
will be sent via the Computer Assisted Immigration Processing
System (CAIPS) to Guatemala (a hub center) where an officer
can decide to either accept, reject, or call the applicant to
Guatemala for a personal interview.
¶5. (U) Carter explained that CIC staffs its posts with both
Canadian Foreign Service Officers and Locally Engaged Staff
(LES). The local hires are given a great deal of
responsibility. Most significantly, CIC allows them to
adjudicate both immigrant and non-immigrant visas. Because
they are given such a high degree of responsibility, these
local hires are usually either Canadian expatriates or
trusted Embassy employees who have served in the Embassy for
several years. While the Canadian Foreign Service Officers
are technically the supervisors of the locally hired staff,
the two groups, in fact, work side-by-side and perform many
of the same duties. This sharing of duties occurs even
though the local hires receive both less training and a
significantly less comprehensive security check than their
commissioned colleagues. It should be noted, however, that
only Canadian Foreign Service Officers have access to the
actual visa foils, which are kept locked away, and the
locally hired staff is also denied access to all classified
information.
¶6. (U) Carter could not remember any recent occasions when
locally hired staff abused their right to adjudicate visas.
He said that when scandals occur, they usually arise as money
is moved back-and-forth during the accounting part of the
process, not from malfeasance in the visa issuing process.
Carter did admit, however, that there are some regions where
CIC feels that local staff could be easily compromised.
Therefore, in these areas, CIC does not allow local staff to
adjudicate visas. There are, for example, no local staff
adjudicating visas in Moscow or the Middle East, and in
Beijing only Canadian expatriates are used. The place where
local staff adjudicators are most greatly utilized is in the
United States. (Note: Despite Carter,s claims, there have
been several incidents recently in which Canadian local hires
have been found guilty of malfeasance. Two weeks ago, a
Syrian Embassy worker (part of the PA office and not
affiliated with CIC) was fired after allegedly taking a bribe
to help someone illegally obtain a visa. In 2002, two
locally hired CIC employees were fired in New Delhi after
recommending favorable decisions for their relatives. End
note).
-----------------------------
Canada,s Visa Issuing Process
-----------------------------
¶7. (U) Canadian non-immigrant visas come in only three
types: tourist, student, or worker visas. Canadian officers,
however, have a wide variety of choices for rejecting these
non-immigrant visa applicants. The most often cited reasons,
according to Carter, for rejection are "insufficient funds"
or "lack of bona fides;" however, there is no overarching
reason for rejection equivalent to the United States, 214
(b). A Canadian officer writes notes on all of his/her
refusals and these notes are stored in the CAIPS computer
system for two years. During this time, all other
adjudicating officers can view these notes. There is no time
restraint on reapplying and an applicant has the right to
reapply for a visa immediately if he/she desires.
¶8. (U) Canada,s process for immigrant visas differs from
the non-immigrant visa process. The immigrant visa process
involves a point system in which candidates receive points
for meeting certain criteria (5 points for a high school
diploma, 24 points for speaking both French and English, 10
points at the discretion of the interviewer, etc.). Once an
applicant reaches the 75-point threshold, he/she qualifies
for the immigrant visa. The rejection notes for immigrant
visas are kept for five years, three years longer than
non-immigrant visas.
¶9. (U) It is not unusual to have a high discrepancy between
the visa rejection rate of an American mission and a Canadian
mission located in the same country. In Albania, for
example, the U.S. rejection rate is close to 70% while the
Canadians reject only about 40%. This is most often the
case, although not the rule: American visa rejection rates
are usually higher than their Canadian counterparts. Carter
theorized that this discrepancy might occur because, at many
Canadian consulates, a secretary acts as an initial vetter
for applications and tells those with no chance not to waste
their money. This eliminates many potential rejections and
deflates the Canadian rejection average as compared to the
U.S. average. It should also be noted that Canada,s refusal
rate has been consistently climbing over the last few years.
Statistics furnished by CIC show that the refusal rate for
visitor visas to Canada this year are 3.5% higher than last
year and student visa rejection rates are up 4.2 % over 2002
numbers.
-----------------
Security Measures
-----------------
¶10. (U) According to Carter, the Computer Assisted
Immigration Processing System (CAIPS) is not directly
connected to any type of security lookout list. There is,
however, a domestic lookout system called the Field Operation
System (FOS) that is maintained by CIC. Adjudicating
officers can perform security name checks using this FOS
system. Carter said that there are plans to integrate FOS
into CAIPS by 2005 so that the two will no longer be separate
systems. Since FOS is not integrated with the databases of
either the Canadian Security and Intelligence Services (CSIS)
or the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), its usefulness
as a security mechanism is not fully developed. Carter was
not aware of any plans to consolidate these agencies,
databases in the way that databases were combined in the U.S.
after September 11th.
¶11. (SBU) One of the larger security changes that CIC
adopted following September 11th was reducing the number of
countries that qualify for the Canadian visa waiver program.
A few years ago, Canada allowed a great many more countries
to travel visa free than did the United States. The
differences between the two countries have narrowed over the
past few years; however, many of the countries that Canada
has removed are considered by the U.S. to be relatively
insignificant security threats. After significant U.S.
pressure, Canada did recently remove Saudi Arabia and
Malaysia from its visa waiver program; however, there still
remain some significant differences between the U.S. and
Canadian visa waiver programs. Most significantly, citizens
of Greece, Mexico, and Korea are allowed to travel to Canada
without a visa. Carter said that Canada realizes how
concerned the U.S. is about these three countries being on
the visa waiver program. He said that there have been some
discussions about removing these three from the program, but
he did not have any information regarding their imminent
removal. Carter was able to report that Costa Rica, the last
country in Latin America able to travel visa free, would be
removed from the visa waiver program shortly.
¶12. (U) Comment: Communication and cooperation between the
United States and Canada on visa procedures have improved
over the last few years. The Canadians appear to be
sensitive to U.S. concerns and are beginning to take steps to
alleviate them. The increase in Canada,s visa rejection
rate and the decrease in the number of countries on the visa
waiver list are steps in the right direction. Canada,
however, still has much left to do to reassure U.S.
authorities that the country is not being used as a Trojan
horse by aliens whose ultimate goal is to bypass U.S. visa
requirements on their way into the United States. Three
significant actions that Canada should undertake are: 1) to
reduce the level of responsibility currently enjoyed by its
locally hired staff; 2) to create a consolidated database
system that allows its Foreign Service Officers to do
thorough security name check searches on applicants; and, 3)
to remove Greece, Korea, and Mexico from its visa waiver
program.
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa
KELLY