

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06HELSINKI696, EU-US INFORMAL SENIOR-LEVEL MEETING ON JUSTICE AND HOME
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06HELSINKI696.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06HELSINKI696 | 2006-07-21 12:28 | 2011-04-24 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Helsinki |
VZCZCXRO7598
RR RUEHAST
DE RUEHHE #0696/01 2021228
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 211228Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY HELSINKI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2195
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
RHEFHLC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HELSINKI 000696
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SNAR PREL PGOV CVIS CPAS KCRM KFRD SMIG EUN FI
SUBJECT: EU-US INFORMAL SENIOR-LEVEL MEETING ON JUSTICE AND HOME
AFFAIRS COOPERATION
HELSINKI 00000696 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY. The U.S. and EU, under the chair of the Finnish
Presidency, met in Helsinki on July 18 for the Informal Senior Level
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) Meeting. Led by Acting INL DAS
Elizabeth Verville, DOJ liaison to USEU Mark Richard, and DHS Acting
A/S for Policy Development Paul Rosenzweig, USDEL continued its
ongoing dialogue on issues related to counterterrorism, law
enforcement, border security and migration. USDEL emphasized the
importance of building upon existing cooperation and improving
coordination, most notably to ensure a continuous flow of
information between respective law enforcement agencies. In this
regard, both sides welcomed the progress in negotiations for an
agreement between the U.S. and Eurojust, as well as the final
signature on the bilateral protocols that once ratified will enable
the implementation of the U.S.-EU Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) and
Extradition Treaties. In addition, EU representatives confirmed that
the passarelle option would be pursued under the Finnish Presidency
and expressed hope that a final decision could be taken by December,
which would thereby change decision making on justice related
issues. USDEL thanked the EU for receipt of its proposal for a
revised Passenger Name Record (PNR) agreement and welcomed future
discussions. EU participants stressed the urgency to come to an
agreement to cover the interim period, September 30, 2006 - November
2007, before a new agreement could be concluded. Lastly, EU reps
requested the U.S. confirm a date for the U.S.-EU JHA
Ministerial-Troika, proposed for November 6 in Washington. It was
also suggested to hold the JHA High Level Policy Dialogue on Border
and Transport Security (PDBTS) on the margins of the Ministerial
meeting. END SUMMARY.
Counterterrorism and Security
------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) EU reps provided a status report on the implementation of
the EU Counterterrorism (CT) Strategy. While the EU is making
progress on biometric requirements for passports, development of the
Schengen Information System (SIS) II is facing technical
difficulties and will likely not be ready by the April 2007
deadline. In response to a U.S. request for direct access for third
countries to SIS II data, the EU stated it would be difficult to
allow such access for political reasons, although there would be no
technical impediments to sharing. However, the EU is currently
exploring whether the Interpol database system could serve as an
alternative with respect to sharing of specific categories of data.
The European Commission (Commission) also reported it has been
consulting with private sector stakeholders on critical
infrastructure protection and on the development of detection
technologies in the field of CT. On the latter initiative, the
Commission will publish a green paper this summer and welcomes U.S.
input. In regards to the misuse of charities, the EU has held
discussions with the nonprofit sector, but indicated that it does
not intend to pursue a legislative approach at this stage as a way
to prevent terrorist support being accomplished via such charities.
¶3. (SBU) U.S. and EU participants agreed on the importance of
coordinating with G8 CT initiatives and of promoting further
research on terrorist's misuse of the Internet in order to tackle
radicalization and recruitment. Richard stressed the importance of
also focusing on operational issues in addition to concentrating on
public diplomacy initiatives. The Commission noted that an EU
delegation visited Washington on July 17 for consultations on the
EU's project to develop a non-emotive lexicon. The EU is also
establishing an expert advisory group that will issue two reports,
one on the state of current research on radicalization due in
November, and a second report on the phenomenon as such, which is
due to be released in January 2007. A/S Rosenzweig briefly
described DHS efforts in this area, including DHS Science and
Technology's research programs and civil integration initiatives in
Citizen and Immigrant Services and suggested that both sides
coordinate efforts to avoid unnecessary duplication.
¶4. (SBU) EU representatives stressed the importance of recent
dialogue with regard to human rights and terrorism, emphasizing the
importance of POTUS statements at the June Summit on the intention
to close the Guantanamo detention facility and the recent Supreme
Court ruling on military tribunals to try enemy combatants. USDEL
clarified that the Supreme Court ruling established Article III of
the Geneva Convention as being applicable to enemy combatants and
ruled that the system of military tribunals is inconsistent with
U.S. law, which is being addressed by Congress.
¶5. (U) Under this item, USDEL also introduced Jane Horvath, DOJ's
recently appointed Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer. She
provided EU delegates with an overview of the data protection model
in the U.S. government. In particular, she highlighted the focus on
the protection of privacy in the Administration's information
sharing efforts. [NOTE: On the margins, EU participants seemed very
eager to learn more about Horvath's function within the U.S. system,
HELSINKI 00000696 002.2 OF 003
particularly as it related to data protection and oversight. For
example, Eurojust extended an invitation for Horvath to brief the
organization on the Administration's data protection efforts.
Europol requested a copy of her office's upcoming, statutorily
mandated report. The EU Council Secretariat representative made
comparisons with Horvath regarding U.S. data protection and EU data
protection. He indicated a desire to learn more. END NOTE]
Justice and Law Enforcement Issues
----------------------------------
¶6. (SBU) Both sides praised the recent breakthrough in negotiations
for a U.S.-Eurojust agreement, and highlighted the possibility of a
signing ceremony at the U.S.-EU Ministerial in Washington this
November. Eurojust also indicated its intention to circulate a
questionnaire that once completed would assist in further
discussions on the use of intelligence in criminal proceedings. In
addition, with the final signature on the bilateral protocols of the
U.S.-EU Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) and Extradition Treaties, the
EU and U.S. agreed that training would be critical to ensure proper
and timely implementation, especially of the banking provision, and
should not wait until ratifications are complete.
¶7. (SBU) Europol also noted that three countries had yet to ratify
the third protocol to the Europol Convention, which would allow U.S.
access to Europol's analytical case files thereby increasing the
depth of operational cooperation. Europol indicated that it would
reach out to these remaining countries and USDEL indicated its
intention to do so as well. USDEL also highlighted the need to work
out processes for receiving requests from Europol as U.S. officials
based in Europol had yet to develop a solid relationship with their
Europol counterparts.
¶8. (SBU) In regard to the UN Convention against Corruption,
Verville highlighted ongoing discussions in advance of the
Conference of the States Parties (COSP) scheduled for December 2006
and stressed the importance of examining the core provisions,
including criminalization, international cooperation and asset
recovery. While monitoring would need to be looked at, Verville
noted that a solid base for implementation must first be
established. The Finnish rep expressed a preference to focus first
on a monitoring mechanism.
¶9. (SBU) In relation to the Balkans, USDEL noted that the draft
charter for SECI contained stringent data protection provisions that
would prevent cooperation with the U.S. EU reps indicated that a
second version is still in the drafting stages and offered no
further information. On counter-narcotics issues in Afghanistan, EU
reps reacted cautiously to a U.S. proposal for Member States to use
the 1988 UN Drug Convention as the basis for extradition of drug
traffickers as they foresaw problems related to jurisdiction in such
cases. Eurojust agreed to take the issue back to The Hague and
report the proposal to its members, getting back to the U.S. as soon
as possible.
¶10. (SBU) The EU reported that progress had been slow on the EU
draft Data Protection Framework Decision, but hoped to complete it
by end of this year. EU reps refused to comment on how this
Framework Decision could affect information sharing with third
country law enforcement, or how or whether existing agreements would
be preserved. Rosenzweig also highlighted for the EU that a vast
majority of current law enforcement cooperation is conducted
informally and outside the framework of formal agreements. The
Finns also indicated that they will be moving forward on the
passarelle option as a way to improve decision-making on justice and
police matters and hoped for a decision by December. Under this
option, unspecified justice issues would be moved from consensus
decision making by Member States (Third Pillar) to qualified
majority voting (First Pillar). Significantly, they would
thereafter fall within the ambit of the current Pillar One Data
Protection Directives, as well as Parliament involvement in any
proposed legislation.
¶11. (SBU) Finally, USDEL informed EU reps that the U.S. would soon
be placing an intellectual property (IP) enforcement coordinator in
Eastern Europe, in addition to placing permanent IP attaches in
select Embassies and Consulates. USDEL also provided an overview of
a meeting between FBI and the European Police College (CEPOL) to
discuss potential avenues of cooperation. The Commission emphasized
that cooperation with the U.S. would have to be approved by the
Council.
Migration, Borders and Visa Issues
----------------------------------
¶12. (SBU) USDEL thanked the EU for receipt of the EU's proposal for
a revised PNR agreement and welcomed future discussions. EU
participants stressed the urgency to come to an agreement to cover
the interim period, September 30, 2006 - November 2007. In addition,
HELSINKI 00000696 003.2 OF 003
EU reps noted that some Member States will need to invoke
Constitutional procedures to ratify a new agreement, which might not
happen until 2007. The EU hoped, but could not guarantee, that all
Member States could put an agreement into immediate effect on a
provisional basis, pending ultimate parliamentary endorsement.
¶13. (SBU) The Commission delegation noted that the release of their
latest report on visa reciprocity would likely be delayed until
September.
¶14. (SBU) Rosenzweig urged EU Member States to share lost and
stolen passport (LASP) data with Interpol and suggested that they
confiscate LASPs when found at borders - as the US is doing.
Frelick (State/CA) provided a progress report on administering U.S.
e-passports. In addition, the EU provided a brief overview of
FRONTEX, which was established to facilitate operational cooperation
at EU external borders. EU reps noted that FRONTEX was seeking to
establish working relationships with third countries and had thus
far reached out to Russian Border Guards. Rosenzweig indicated DHS
interest in working cooperatively, particularly on best practices,
and invited further discussion. Rosenzweig also discussed
developing aviation entry/exit screening in light of a possible
pandemic to avoid stopping all international travel, and asked the
EU to consider working with us to develop a common set of protocols
or standards. The EU reps cautioned that data protection would need
to be addressed before such cooperation could ensue which might
include any effort to identify individual travelers.
Other Issues
------------
¶15. (SBU) At the end of the meeting, German Director General Gunter
Krause questioned when the Finnish Presidency would conduct the
expert group meeting, as indicated in the May 4, Vienna communiqu,
to discuss the future EU-U.S.-Russian tripartite cooperation and
make recommendations for the German Presidency. Verville inquired
as to what topics the EU/Presidencies had in mind, as well as the
advantages and recommendations of such a dialogue. Verville
suggested that the U.S. and EU discuss respective bilateral
cooperation with Russia in advance of conducting a meeting that
included other countries. She also added that while the U.S.
remained open to the concept, she was not in a position to put forth
any suggestions as the U.S. had not yet identified discussion topics
that would achieve concrete benefits. The EU Presidency agreed with
Verville's summation and suggestion. [NOTE: On the margins of the
dinner, Krause, sensing a lack of enthusiasm from Finland or in
Germany raised with Verville and Rosenzweig an uncleared proposal to
continue the four Presidency-U.S.-Russian dialogue by, in essence,
expanding the tripartite meeting with Russia to include Azerbaijan,
Armenia, Moldova and Georgia. In response to Verville's question as
to what they would expect to raise/achieve in such an expanded
meeting, Krause said he was looking for answers, but did not have
one himself. Krause said they would await an answer/reaction from
the U.S., and Verville replied that such an answer would be
facilitated by knowing what they had in mind by way of an agenda and
outcomes. END NOTE]
¶16. (U) The U.S. delegation included: Elizabeth Verville, State
Acting INL DAS; Paul Rosenzweig, DHS Acting A/S for Policy
Development; Mark Richard, DOJ Liaison to USEU; Kathleen Conway, CBP
Liaison to USEU; Christine Cline, State/INL; Timothy Eydelnant, Emb
Helsinki; Alcy Frelick, State/CA; Jane Horvath, DOJ; Kenneth Kolb,
Emb Helsinki; Alessandro Nardi, State/EUR; Kenneth Prop, State/L;
Michael Scardaville, DHS; and Jessica Steffens, State/INL.
¶17. (U) EU participants included: Antti Pelttari, Director General
for the International Security Affairs Unit in the Finnish Ministry
of Interior; Matti Jousten, EU-Coordinator in the Finnish Ministry
of Justice; Giles de Kerchove, Director in the EU Council
Secretariat; Paul Hickey, Director in the EU Council Secretariat;
SIPDIS
Marque Tung-Lai, Director of JLS General Affairs in the European
Commission; Jan De Ceuster, Head of the Unit on Borders and Visas in
the European Commission; Roelof-Jan Manshot, Vice-President of
Eurojust; Maz-Peter Ratzel, Director of Europol; Michael Grotz,
Deputy Director General of German Federal Ministry of Justice;
Gunter Krause, German Federal Ministry of the Interior; as well as
Vivian Loonela, Administrator in the European Commission; Christiane
Hohmann, Administrator in the European Commission; Kari Rantama,
Finnish Deputy National Police Commissioner; Pentti Visanen, Finnish
Immigration Department; Kalle Kekomaki, Finnish Ministry of
Interior; Elina Isoksela, Finnish Ministry of Justice; Sakari
Vourensola, Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA); Leena
Kiukkonen, Finnish MFA; Juha Rainne, Finnish MFA; Hikka Nenonen,
Finnish MFA; and, Veli-Pekka Rautava, Finnish MFA.
¶18. (U) This cable has been cleared by the U.S. Delegation.
WARE