

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09QUITO70, QUITO'S NEW AIRPORT MAKES PROGRESS BUT FACES BIG
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09QUITO70.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09QUITO70 | 2009-01-29 19:28 | 2011-05-02 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Quito |
VZCZCXYZ0032
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHQT #0070/01 0291928
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 291928Z JAN 09
FM AMEMBASSY QUITO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9971
INFO RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA 7942
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 3365
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ JAN LIMA 3008
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL 4065
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC 0622
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
UNCLAS QUITO 000070
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EAIR EAID EINV ECIN EC MARR MCAP
SUBJECT: QUITO'S NEW AIRPORT MAKES PROGRESS BUT FACES BIG
CHALLENGES
REFTEL A: 07 Quito 2571
B: 07 Quito 181725Z
C: 08 Quito 986
D: 09 Quito 59
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The construction of Quito's new airport has made
significant progress. The project is large and complex, however,
dealing with an unpredictable political environment, sensitive
community relations, and environmental challenges. The builders
have made several recent missteps that attracted negative press
coverage and scrutiny from GOE officials. In addition, outstanding
elements like a municipal access road and a new public security
facility threaten to delay or otherwise disrupt the new airport's
opening in October 2010. End summary.
Construction Status
-------------------
¶2. (U) Quito's new airport is a massive project that covers 351
hectares and has a projected cost of roughly $600 million. The GOE
has been holding the land for this project since the 1980s but only
began construction in 2006. Since that date significant progress
has been made, and the project is now 42% complete. The builders
say that over 90% of the required materials have been purchased and
the initial earth works, which consisted of leveling the site
plateau for runways and buildings, are 91% complete. In addition,
the builders say that they have nearly finished pouring concrete for
the 38,000 square meter passenger terminals and the control tower.
They expect to complete the structured steel frames for the
terminals in February 2009. They point to progress installing
necessary infrastructure for telecommunications, electricity, water,
sewage, and rainwater drainage. The consortium has also nearly
completed the access road into the site. The builders say the
project is now mostly on schedule, with only slight delays in the
infrastructure elements, which they expect to correct in the next
few months.
¶3. (U) The Quito airport project has been controlled since 1999 by
the Quito municipality-controlled entity Corpaq, which signed a
concession with the Canadian Government entity Canadian Commercial
Corporation (CCC) to develop the airport. CCC in turn hired the
Quiport consortium to manage the current airport and build the new
one. Quiport is made up of Aecon (a Canadian company), Andrade
Gutierrez (Brazilian) and Houston Airport Systems (U.S.). The
project has financial backing from the U.S., Canadian, and
multilateral lenders OPIC, ExIm Bank, Inter-American Development
Bank, and Export Development Canada (Reftel A). The builders stress
that the project is following U.S. and Canadian labor and
environmental specifications, which has proved challenging in
Ecuador. Quiport acknowledges that there has been some friction
over meeting the lenders' expectations, but company representatives
say that they are committed to satisfying these requirements and say
that they have so far been able to sort out any disagreements.
Construction Progress and Dust Problems
-----------------------------------
¶4. (U) The project's most visible problem has been controlling the
large amounts of dust that the construction creates. On most days
the site throws up large clouds of brown dust that can be seen for
miles. This has sparked complaints from local farming communities
and has led to negative press coverage and criticism from
politicians as well as environmental and health experts. Quiport
says that much of the dust stems from the necessary earthworks. It
notes as well that the site's sandy, volcanic soil is difficult to
work with, and that construction delays have dragged out the
problem. Quiport initially budgeted $400,000 for dust control
measures, but the company has already spent over $2 million.
Quiport says that when asphalt is laid for the runways, grass is
planted, and water systems are installed, it should significantly
reduce the dust levels. Quiport is currently taking construction
bids and expects to begin laying down asphalt in June 2009. Company
officials say that most construction will be completed around the
end of 2009, and they plan to spend the first half of 2010 on
testing and certification of the new airport.
Public Stumbles
---------------
¶5. (SBU) Along with its handling of the dust clouds, Quiport has
been criticized by politicians and airlines for significantly
raising airport fees at the existing Mariscal Sucre airport to pay
for the new airport. Since 2006, airport departure fees have risen
from $25 to $40.80 on international flights, an increase of 63%. In
addition, it has raised the landing, parking and other fees that it
charges the airlines. Quiport recently attempted to improve its
public image with a series of glossy newspaper inserts touting the
benefits of the new airport. This effort was derailed, however, by
an announcement in November that Quiport planned once again to raise
departure fees to $44.30. The decision was announced without
consulting Quito Mayor Paco Moncayo, a prominent supporter of the
project. Moncayo sharply criticized the fee hike, and Ecuador's
Prosecutor General opened an investigation, leading Quiport to delay
indefinitely the increase.
¶6. (U) On January 6th, 2009, the Contraloria of Ecuador (similar to
the U.S. GAO) issued a report criticizing the project for cost
overruns. According to the Contraloria, the contracted cost for
constructing the terminals is $100 million more than appropriate,
and called for contracts to be renegotiated. It also criticized the
use of $15.7 million of GOE funds for an airport access road,
consulting, and reforestation, which it said should have been paid
by Quiport. Quiport declined to comment on the report, saying it
was directed at the government airport authority Corpaq.
Politicians seized on the report, however, saying that the cost
overruns were actually much higher and arguing that it justified
renegotiating the construction contract (Reftel D).
Access Road Could Hinder Airport Opening
----------------------------------------
¶7. (U) The new municipal road to the airport has the greatest
potential to cause major delays in the project. This road will be a
direct route from downtown Quito and should result in a travel time
of only 15 minutes. The road is the responsibility of the
municipality, however, and as of yet, no significant progress has
been made. Quiport officials say there is still sufficient time for
the road to be completed by October 2010, but this appears unlikely.
The land for the road is still not secured, and the city is still
reviewing construction bids for what most people expect to be a
complicated project involving the construction of three bridges
(Reftel B). There are also doubts about the municipality's ability
to pay for the project, although it does have support from the
Andean Development Fund (CAF). The existing route to the new
airport is a narrow and winding road that takes at least 45 minutes,
and much more during rush hour. Quiport officials say they would
consider delaying the airport's opening if the road is not completed
on time, since using the existing road would create significant
traffic and image problems.
Public Security Facility Could Also Cause Complications
--------------------------------------------- ---
¶8. (SBU) The public security facility (Armed Forces and Police) at
the new airport could also cause complications. The Ecuadorian
military needs to build the new facility. No work has been
completed so far, and additional delays will increase costs, since
it will require working around completed civilian structures. We
believe that the Ecuadorian military does not currently have the
funds to complete this project. Some have speculated that the
military could remain at the current airport, but for technical
flight reasons this is impossible (Reftel B). The military might be
able to relocate some of its assets to the airport in Latacunga,
which is roughly 90 minutes south of Quito. It is unclear if the
GOE, or international regulators would certify the airport if the
public security facility is not built, however, since it will house
the airport police.
U.S. Airlines Critical of the Project
-------------------------------------
¶9. (SBU) U.S. airlines complain that Quiport and the GOE have not
provided them with sufficient information about navigation aids and
flight patterns for operations at the new airport. Quiport and GOE
officials stress the benefits of the project, saying that it will be
a modern facility and will eliminate the hazards of landing planes
in a crowded urban center (Reftel A). Airline officials dispute
these claims, however, saying that the new airport's location is the
equivalent of taking of and landing "in a hole." They argue that
the new location will be far more challenging for their pilots and
will require expensive use of additional fuel. In addition, some
U.S. and international airlines have resisted paying the increased
airport fees, but lost their legal challenge to the fee increase
(Reftel C). American and Continental had been making their payments
to an escrow fund, but now are obliged to pay directly to Quiport,
although they characterize their payments as made "under protest."
Comment
-------
¶10. (SBU) The new Quito airport is one of the largest ongoing
foreign investments in Ecuador at this time. Under the best of
circumstances, large foreign investments face a number of
challenges, particularly in the regulated sectors. The Quito
airport project is an exception only in that it seems to face
criticisms and challenges from more quarters than most other
investments. That said, the project continues to move forward and
is less than two years from its scheduled opening.
Hodges