

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08WELLINGTON64, 2008 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - NEW ZEALAND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08WELLINGTON64.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08WELLINGTON64 | 2008-02-22 03:16 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO4335
RR RUEHNZ
DE RUEHWL #0064/01 0530316
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 220316Z FEB 08
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5089
INFO RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5113
RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1630
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0647
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 0213
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000064
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR EAP/ANP, EEB/TPP/IPE JBOGER, STATE PASS TO USTR JENNIFER
GROVES AND COMMERCE FOR CASSIE PETERS ITA/MAC/OIPR
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD KIPR NZ
SUBJECT: 2008 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - NEW ZEALAND
REF: STATE 9475
¶1. (SBU) Summary: Post recommends that New Zealand (GNZ) not/not be
placed on the Special 301 List in 2008. The country's overall
commitment to the protection of intellectual property (IPR) is
relatively high as compared to most countries cited in the Special
301 review. Despite the slower than anticipated pace of legislative
progress, the government remains committed to updating its
intellectual property laws to ensure compliance with international
standards, with planned revisions of the Patents Bill and the
Copyright Amendments Bill ("New Technologies and Performers' Rights
Bill") progressing through the legislative queue. Some momentum has
been lost over the past year due to slowdown in the legislative
agenda as the Government shifts its attention to upcoming elections
in 2008. Though New Zealand generally provides adequate and
effective protection of intellectual property rights (IP) under
current law, Post will continue to engage Members of Parliament, the
Ministry of Economic Development and local IP industry in order to
press our concerns that pending legislation reflects international
IP standards and passage occurs in a timely fashion. To date issues
raised about the draft Copyright Bill by IP industry are being
considered by the government and will be monitored by Post. It's
reasonable to anticipate a renewed commitment to the passage of IP
legislation by the GNZ post election cycle. Placing New Zealand on
the Special 301 list at this stage may prove to be
counter-productive as it likely will result in a defensive rather
than consultative exchange. End summary.
International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA)'s Special
Mention of New Zealand's IP Regime
--------------------------------------------- -------
¶2. (U) As IIPA noted in its Special 301 submission, that the
Commerce Committee of the New Zealand Parliament issued its
long-awaited report on the Copyright (New Technologies and
Performer's Rights) Amendment Bill in July 2007. This extensive
proposed amendment to New Zealand's copyright law contains many
valuable improvements but some provisions remain problematic for
industry. Post agrees with IIPA's recommendation that an effective
course of action would be to continue to engage the government in
order to ensure that the draft legislation provides more useful
tools for dealing with piracy. Post has presented the list of noted
shortfalls in the draft legislation to Minister Tizard (Consumer
Affairs), Minister Goff (Trade) and to officials within the Ministry
of Economic Development, the agency primarily responsible for
drafting legislation and monitoring IP enforcement. Post remains
engaged with Bronwyn Turley, Senior MED Policy Advisor for IP issues
to maintain a dialogue to address the needed technical corrections.
GNZ Response to IIPA Submission
-------------------------------
¶3. (U) The Copyright Bill is currently part way through its second
reading in the New Zealand Parliament. The concerns raised by IIPA
regarding the Bill's shortcomings are currently being considered by
the government. Paragraphs 4 to 15 below summarize legislation
intent and language in highlighted provisions of the draft Copyright
Bill that have been brought to GNZ's attention by the IIPA.
Detailed drafts of legal texts and proposed revisions to the
Copyright Bill can be forwarded separately from MED if required.
Anticipated Treatment of TPMs under Proposed Bill
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶4. (U) Per MED, development and employment of TPMs have raised
issues beyond the realm of copyright law for GNZ. They often relate
to disclosure issues, such as insufficient or incorrect information
to consumers concerning technological protected materials and their
usability restrictions, and could often be addressed by contract
law, privacy laws or consumer protection laws. The issuer of a TPM
would still need to comply with those other existing laws as the TPM
provisions do not 'trump' any other laws. Copyright owners can
continue using TPMs that control access, however, without assistance
from the Act. Owners could, for example, continue to rely on other
legal measures, such as the law of contract, where an access
protection measure is circumvented.
¶5. (U) GNZ notes that the WIPO Copyright Treaty 1994, to which New
Zealand is not a party yet, not only calls for nations to "provide
adequate legal protection and effective legal remedies against the
circumvention of effective technological measures" but also
recognizes "the need to maintain a balance between the rights of
authors and the large public interest, particularly education,
research and access to information" in updating international
WELLINGTON 00000064 002 OF 003
copyright norms to respond to challenges arising new technologies.
GNZ feels that the translation of this balance into domestic laws is
a matter of national circumstances and domestic policies, and
parties to this treaty have implemented the TPM provision in
different ways.
ISP liability limitation
------------------------
¶6. (U) Per MED, the Bill contains provisions which limit ISP
liability for copyright infringement by third parties. Copying is a
central function of the internet and the services provided by ISPs.
Material may be reproduced at many stages during the course of a
transmission and it can be virtually impossible to identify when and
where many of these copies are made. When the material being copied
is subject to copyright protection, an ISP could face liability for
both primary and secondary infringement of copyright. There is a
public interest in ensuring cost-effective access to the internet,
which may be affected by uncertain or increased liability for ISPs.
¶7. (U) The Select Committee made some changes to the ISP provisions.
It removed the provision that limits ISP liability only when the
ISP had adopted and reasonably implemented a policy relating to
termination of the accounts of repeat infringers. A number of
submitters raised concerns about this provision, including that it
was unnecessary (because standard ISP terms and conditions generally
already allow for this) and that its scope and application were
quite unclear.
¶8. (U) Drafting changes were made to the provisions in new sections
92B and 92C which preserve the ability for a copyright owner to seek
injunctive relief. These changes were suggested by the specialist
advisers to the Committee and arose out of concern that the
provisions were not drafted in a way that would effectively preserve
the ability for a copyright holder to seek an injunction against an
ISP.
¶9. (U) Changes were made to section 92C (2) at Select Committee and
new sections 92CA and 92CB were added. These changes arose out of
recommendations by the specialist advisers to the Committee.
Section 92C previously specified that an ISP is not infringing
unless they know or have reason to believe that the material is
infringing, and do not delete or prevent access to the material as
soon as possible after they become aware. Concern was raised by the
advisers that this test did not provide sufficient certainty for
ISPs about when they would be required to take material down, and
that it diverged from the tests used in other jurisdictions. In
response to these concerns, the following changes were made:
-- The test was altered to clarify that the ISP must either know or
have received a notice that the material was infringing;
-- There is a new requirement that notices must be properly
completed, signed and in the prescribed form;
-- There is a new offence for knowingly or recklessly providing a
notice that is materially false or misleading.
Access to Pharmaceuticals and Patent Protection
--------------------------------------------- --
¶10. (SBU) While the U.S. pharmaceutical industry (PhRMA) urges that
New Zealand be placed on the priority watch list (PWL) in 2008, post
continues to believe that the industry's restricted access to New
Zealand's market stems primarily from the cost containment
strategies for subsidized drugs that are a part of the National
Medicines Strategy (NMS). The government affiliated Pharmaceutical
Management Agency (PHARMAC) is mandated to spend less than its
budget allows, and the pharmaceutical industry has a number of
legitimate complaints about its treatment in the purchasing process.
However, these industry concerns are not IP problems per se. While
Post will continue to work to improve access for U.S.
pharmaceuticals in the New Zealand market, we believe this should be
dealt with as a market-access barrier and not as a failure to
protect intellectual property. Even the pharmaceutical industry
trade association here, Researched Medicines Industry Association of
New Zealand (RMI - affiliated with PhRMA), assesses that the
government's practices do not violate its TRIPS commitments. Post
will continue to engage appropriate Ministers and MED to find ways
to improve market access.
¶11. (SBU) While the new draft Patent Bill unfortunately has remained
on the parliamentary docket for some time now, sources at the
Ministry of Economic Development claim the Bill will meet
WELLINGTON 00000064 003 OF 003
international IP legislative standards. Modeled largely after
current British patent law, the GNZ drafters had hoped to capture
the UK's experience in structuring its revised patent regime to EU
standards. An unofficial preliminary draft version of the bill,
called an "exposure draft," was initially released in 2005 and
received only technical comments as to the form of the bill. These
have been reviewed and applied as appropriate. Despite the bill's
long gestation period, MED attorneys responsible for drafting feel
that the bill is likely to pass with little additional modification.
Under current law, the level of IP protection for pharmaceuticals
remains adequate. Post does agree that it is in New Zealand's and
our best interests to complete work on the draft Patents Bill
promptly in order to ensure that New Zealand's patent regime
reflects international standards. Post believes the better course
of action is to continue to work/consult with the GNZ to ensure
industry's concerns are reflected in pending legislation.
Enforcement
-----------
¶12. (U) GNZ remains committed to enforcing its IP laws adequately
and effectively. In most instances, the government responds to
complaints raised by rights holders against IP infringers. The
government set up a new office within New Zealand Customs in 2007
that is exclusively dedicated to IP enforcement issues. Currently,
New Zealand Customs can confiscate and destroy pirated products if
the holder of the trademark or copyright has requested that Customs
detain the goods. That request is valid for five years and can be
renewed. Almost all the infringing goods imported into New Zealand
originated in Asia, particularly China, and most of the intercepted
and investigated goods were clothing, footwear and headwear. The
number of pirated CDs and DVDs intercepted by Customs has declined
sharply, after peaking in 2006. While it appears that CDs and DVDs
are increasingly being copied to order within New Zealand, making
detection of local production increasingly difficult, industry as an
ongoing cooperative dialogue with local authorities to better police
IPR as new forms of piracy are detected.
¶13. (U) Conclusion: Post maintains that, despite certain technical
deficiencies and delays in the pending intellectual property laws,
there remains a strong commitment on the part of the GNZ to continue
to improve its IP regime and bring it into conformance with
international standards. GNZ's enforcement of current IP laws also
reflects the government's proactive stance as they learn and adapt
to help stem new forms of piracy. While there is additional work to
be done to strengthen the law and enhance enforcement, Post
recommends the better course of action is to continue engagement
with the GNZ and monitor the progress of IP legislation rather than
place New Zealand on this year's watch list. End conclusion.
MCCORMICK