

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07SANJOSE335, 2007 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - COSTA RICA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07SANJOSE335.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07SANJOSE335 | 2007-02-20 19:17 | 2011-03-18 21:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
Appears in these articles: http://www.nacion.com/2011-03-18/Investigacion/NotasSecundarias/Investigacion2716690.aspx http://www.nacion.com/2011-03-18/Investigacion/NotasSecundarias/Investigacion2716698.aspx |
VZCZCXYZ0006
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0335/01 0511917
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 201917Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7289
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000335
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
WHA/CEN
EEB FOR JBOGER
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR JENNIFER CHOE GROVES
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON KIPR CS
SUBJECT: 2007 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - COSTA RICA
REF: A. 05 SAN JOSE 0508
¶B. 06 SAN JOSE 0464
1.(U) SUMMARY. Costa Rica is making progress in passing laws to
protect intellectual property rights (IPR), but still falls short in
the area of enforcement due to lack of resources and weak political
will. Chapter 15 of the U.S.-Central America-Dominican Republic
Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) contains important provisions to
strengthen the legal and enforcement framework, but the treaty is
not yet in force. The agreement was signed on August 5, 2004 (i.e.,
some two and a half years ago) and we expect ratification during the
first half of 2007 and implementation before the February 29, 2008
deadline. Opposition by roughly one third of Costa Ricans including
very strong opposition by a small but vocal minority has so far
succeeded in delaying the treaty's ratification and implementation.
However, significant progress has been made in the past eight
months. President Oscar Arias is pursuing a dual track approach in
the national assembly to simultaneously consider both ratification
and passage of the necessary implementing legislation, including
several new laws related to IPR. Meanwhile, post continues to
successfully recruit candidates for IPR training from various
sectors of the government including Costa Rica's Supreme Court, and
local businesses are pursuing IPR educational initiatives. 2006 saw
the first IPR enforcement case that resulted in a conviction in many
years. Taking all of these factors into consideration, Post
recommends that Costa Rica remain on the Watch List (WL). End
Summary
---------------------------------------
TRIPS COMPLIANCE AND LEGISLATIVE ISSUES
---------------------------------------
¶2. (U) Since inclusion on the Priority Watch List (PWL) in 2001, the
GOCR has sought to improve its legal framework for protection of IPR
and most importantly has significant new legislation necessary to
implement CAFTA under active consideration. Costa Rica brought into
force the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the WIPO Performance and
Phonograms Treaty (WPPT) on March 6, 2002 and May 20, 2002,
respectively. Costa Rica has also ratified the Patent Cooperation
Treaty (PCT). Despite these ratifications, Costa Rica's IPR legal
regime is noncompliant on certain TRIPS provisions. Areas of
concern are Costa Rica's lack of strongly defined time periods of
protection and insufficient criminal sentences. However, these
issues are addressed in several pending bills required to bring
CAFTA-DR into force, bills that have been the subject of many weeks
of legislative hearings in late 2006. The IPR bills are included on
a priority agenda for legislation action, and post expects the IPR
legislative package to be enacted before the end of 2007. It is
likely that these bills will take effect even before CAFTA-DR
actually comes into force.
-----------
ENFORCEMENT
-----------
¶3. (U) Despite significant progress being made in the legislature in
recent months, industry sources remain very concerned with the small
degree of enforcement of existing laws. Costa Rican laws provide
for both criminal and civil enforcement of IPR. The Attorney
General is widely quoted as saying that given the workload his
office faces with limited resources, IPR prosecutions are a low
priority. Industry sources say the Attorney General has recommended
that private civil actions be pursued. However, the civil system is
viewed as inadequate due primarily to the difficulties in
establishing damages. Further, the amount of statutory damages is
too small to serve as an incentive to pursue civil actions.
Accordingly, the vast majority of matters are brought through the
criminal system. One case, involving a defendant accused of selling
t-shirts with a fake trademark, was successfully prosecuted in late
¶2006. However, because it was his first criminal conviction, the
defendant received a suspended sentence as required under Costa
Rican law. Moreover, the IPR community was disappointed that local
media failed to report the conviction, which might have served as a
disincentive to other IPR violators.
¶4. (U) The Ministry of Public Security has a special organized crime
division to combat organized and trans-national crimes occurring in
Costa Rica. The unit focuses on gangs, child sexual exploitation,
stolen car smuggling, and a wide range of other miscellaneous
crimes. Within that unit there are a handful of employees dedicated
to investigating IPR violations.
¶5. (U) The chief prosecutor's office (Fiscalia General) is divided into
several branches dedicated to particular crimes. Under the current
system, IPR crimes fall to a unit designated as "all other crimes."
Due to IP's inclusion in this unit that covers a wide variety of
unrelated criminal activity, the prosecution of IP-related crimes is
adversely affected. Their varied workload means individual
prosecutors have difficulty acquiring the specialized knowledge and
expertise necessary for successful IPR prosecutions.
¶6. (U) Post management has regularly stressed the importance of IPR
enforcement when meeting with Costa Rica's chief prosecutor,
Francisco Dall'Anese. While he says he recognizes the importance of
IPR enforcement, Dall'Anese additionally states that due to the
limited resources of his office, he could not make IPR enforcement a
priority. The prosecutor believes he faces strong public pressure
to focus attention on other "more important" areas (e.g. prosecution
of corruption scandals involving three former presidents, bribery
allegations involving the government's telecom monopoly, drug
trafficking and organized crime). Dall'Anese indicates that
attention to these other areas is necessitated by internal
realities, whereas IPR enforcement is generally viewed as stemming
solely from bilateral or multilateral obligations such as WIPO and
CAFTA-DR. Dall'Anese, whose term expires at the end of 2007, has
suggested that one remedy might be the creation of an effective
administrative process designed solely for the right holder to
procure a seizure of goods without further criminal prosecution.
¶7. (U) Another enforcement problem involves gathering and validating
evidence. Even when a search warrant is issued, upon entering a
manufacturer, vendor, or distributor of counterfeited goods,
investigators can only seize those goods that are counterfeits of
the company that presented the complaint. Thus, while counterfeit
goods of several brands may be present, only those of one brand may
be taken as evidence. Furthermore, a company that has submitted a
complaint must send an expert witness to Costa Rica to testify that
the pirated goods are indeed different than the original. Because
of the small size of the Costa Rican market, this often is not
worthwhile to the affected companies.
¶8. (U) Post believes that there are two specific areas of improvement
in enforcement that would greatly enhance IPR protection. First, a
dedicated and specialized prosecutor's IP unit should be established
separate from the various crimes unit. Although this might not be
feasible in all judicial districts of the country, the creation of a
unit serving the San Jose metropolitan area would greatly increase
the efficiency of enforcement. Second, increased resources should
be provided to the IP investigatory unit of the Ministry of Public
Security so that they can expand the efficiency and quality of their
services.
¶9. (U) The Arias administration has voiced a commitment to improved
enforcement of IPR laws, but so far this has not been accompanied by
additional appropriations. Budgetary constraints have forced the
GOCR to make difficult decisions regarding the allocation of
available funds. Currently, although parts of the GOCR recognize
the need for improvements in IPR enforcement, other areas of
enforcement are given a higher priority. One basis for this
prioritization is the widely held view that IPR enforcement mainly
serves the interests of foreign corporations. Some GOCR officials
hope that through greater local participation in IPR issues and
continued education and public outreach programs, adequate resources
might eventually be committed.
--------------------------------------------- -----
CREATING A POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT CONDUCIVE TO IPR ENFORCEMENT
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶10. (U) Building upon past training initiatives, post has actively
recruited numerous candidates for various IPR training programs
offered by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Costa Rica's
National Registry refers patent review work to the University of
Costa Rica's office known at PROINNOVA. This year for the first
time post sent two industrial design engineers and the general
counsel from PROINNOVA to USPTO courses on industrial design review
and advanced patent law, respectively. In addition post recruited
key personnel from the Ministry of Foreign Trade to attend a course
about copyright in the digital age. It was significant that for the
first time post recruited five members of the judiciary, including
members of the Supreme Court, to participate in IPR enforcement
conferences and training to better understand the country's
obligations under CAFTA-DR. One member of the Supreme Court has
become so interested in IPR issues that he is pursuing academic
training in the field and told Econoff he is working on a special
IPR project for the Supreme Court.
¶11. (U) Efforts to educate and create IPR interest groups are in the
gestation stage. Industry sources report development of an informal
network of professionals with IPR interests. The local American
Chamber of Commerce is working with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on
a pilot project to assess public attitudes towards IPR, with a
public education campaign to be based upon survey results, similar
to an IPR project the U.S. Chamber of Commerce funded in Brazil. As
public interest in IPR protections grows, the political will to take
enforcement seriously is more likely to take hold.
--------------------------------------
USE/PROCUREMENT OF GOVERNMENT SOFTWARE
--------------------------------------
¶12. (U) In 2002, Executive Decree #30, 151-J mandated that all
government ministries use only legally licensed computer software.
According to this decree, each ministry was to conduct an internal
audit and submit a statement of compliance no later than July 31,
¶2003. The government subsequently claimed full certification of all
ministries, although there has been no independent confirmation.
---------------------------
RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
---------------------------
¶13. (U) All public comments that post has seen to date, including those
from the IIPA, IACC and PhRMA recommend that Costa Rica be moved
from the Watch List to the Priority Watch List. These postures
reflect the high level of frustration over IP enforcement post
shares with many firms trying to do business in Costa Rica. While
readily acknowledging these difficulties, we nonetheless believe
that such a move now would be counter-productive to our long-term
goals by lessening the probability that Costa Rica will be able to
ratify and implement CAFTA-DR. Among the laws necessary to
implement the treaty, the IPR legislative package has not generated
public opposition like that which exists for opening the telecom and
insurance monopolies. IPR bills required by CAFTA-DR are moving
forward in the legislative process and have made significant
progress. It appears likely that these bills will be passed and may
even take effect regardless of whether CAFTA-DR is ultimately
brought into force.
--------------------------
COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION
--------------------------
¶14. (SBU) What has been most lacking in the past in Costa Rica is
political will. President Arias has made ratification and
implementation of CAFTA-DR his highest priority. He and his cabinet
are exercising strong leadership to confront obstructionists in the
legislature and the opposition of powerful unions. Post believes
that bringing CAFTA-DR into force is by far the most effective way
to obtain the IPR protections sought by industry. Costa Rica has to
implement significant IPR legislation to bring CAFTA into force by
the Feb. 29, 2008 deadline. That means that the USG will have a
very clear picture of what Costa Rica's IPR regime will look like
for many years before the next 301 report is due. Given the real
possibility for significant improvement during 2007 in legal
guarantees for intellectual property under Costa Rican law, post
favors maintenance of the status quo for one more year. In the
event that the GOCR is unable to implement the significant IPR
legislation required under CAFTA before the next 301 review, we
likely would strongly encourage moving Costa Rica to the Priority
Watch List at the next review. For the above reasons post
recommends Costa Rica remain on the Watch List in 2007.
FRISBIE