

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA875, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY CHERTOFF
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA875.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA875 | 2005-03-23 21:25 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000875
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR WHA/CAN, EB/TRA, AND CA/VO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECIN ASEC PREL CVIS CA PSEPC
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY CHERTOFF
MAINTAINS THE DIALOGUE WITH COUNTERPART DEPUTY PRIME
MINISTER MCLELLAN
REF: OTTAWA 774
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED--PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY.
¶1. (U) Summary: Handguns entering Canada illegally from the
United States and divergence between Canadian and U.S. visa
policies were two unscripted items discussed during
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Michael
Chertoff's and Canadian Deputy Prime Minister (DPM) Anne
McLellan's first meeting on March 17. In general the
meetings discussed progress on implementation of the Smart
Border Action Plan, including critical infrastructure
protection, which is a priority for the Canadians. The
Secretary and DPM looked at progress toward remedying the
SIPDIS
congestion at Windsor-Detroit, the busiest border crossing.
The two leaders also discussed the Buffalo pre-clearance
project, which has so far been stalled primarily over the
issue of legal authorities. Finally, Chertoff and McLellan
participated in a joint press conference on the Top Officials
Three Exercise (TOPOFF 3). End summary.
¶2. (U) The March 17 meeting was the first occasion for
Secretary Chertoff to meet DPM McLellan since the Secretary
SIPDIS
assumed his position. Their meeting continued the tradition
of close cooperation and frequent consultation established by
McLellan's predecessor John Manley and Chertoff's predecessor
Tom Ridge. In December of 2001 Manley and Ridge had signed
the Smart Border Declaration which laid out a 30-point Action
Plan to identify and address security risks while at the same
time facilitating the legitimate flow of people and goods
across the border. Joint working groups comprised of U.S.
DHS agencies and their Canadian counterparts have met
regularly over the past three years to task recommended
actions and track implementation of the Action Plan.
¶3. (SBU) The DPM and Senior Assistant Deputy Minister of the
Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada
(PSEPC) Paul Kennedy explained to Secretary Chertoff the
long-standing partnership between the U.S. and Canada in
policing our shared border, a relationship embodied in the
Cross Border Crime Forum. Since the 9/11 attacks in the
U.S., Canada has sought to strengthen its national and
international security posture, spending over CAN $9 billion
on this effort. Canadian National Security Advisor Rob
Wright spoke about the history of the 1995 Shared Border
Accord and how the GOC is trying to do its part to implement
Smart Border activities, some of which (NEXUS and the Safe
Third Country Agreement) had been identified pre-9/11.
Canadian law enforcement agencies have long participated with
their U.S. counterparts in targeting possible cross-border
criminal and terrorist activities; this relationship has been
formalized under the Integrated Border Enforcement Team
(IBET) program. In addition to physical and infrastructure
enhancements to bolster security, Canada also undertook major
legislative initiatives, such as the Security Act of 2002,
which increases the ability of law enforcement agencies to
combat terrorism specifically. Paul Kennedy observed that
the revised Anti-Terror Act presently before Parliament is in
some ways complementary to the U.S. Patriot Act.
¶4. (SBU) PSEPC has particular responsibility for critical
infrastructure protection. PSEPC officials noted that 60
percent of Canadian infrastructure (e.g., gas pipelines,
electric power lines, tunnels, bridges, and railroads) has
some level of connectivity to the U.S. PSEPC suggested that
there is a need for common risk assessment standards, greater
sharing of information regarding threat levels, and more
joint exercises. PSEPC sees as immediate challenges the
removal of high risk threats and security on the Great Lakes
and St. Lawrence Seaway.
¶5. (SBU) PSEPC also raised the problem of cross-border
firearms smuggling, with DPM McLellan referring specifically
to smuggled pistols coming into Canada from the U.S. and
being used in drug-based gang violence in Toronto. (Comment:
Indeed, Canadian media reported the previous day on the
conviction of two gun smugglers, including one who brought 23
handguns into the country through the Windsor tunnel. End
comment.) Secretary Chertoff asked if Canada experiences the
same problem with handguns as the U.S.; the DPM replied that
it does not, because Canadian law does not recognize a right
to bear arms.
¶6. (SBU) The U.S. raised the issue of visas. Visa policy
coordination is one of the items on the Smart Border Action
Plan. (Comment: It is also one of the most touchy due to
sovereignty and privacy considerations. End comment.)
Secretary Chertoff asked about Canadian visa issuance
SIPDIS
procedures and if his understanding is correct that a mail-in
program was part of the process. The DPM and Rob Wright said
that wasn't true, that interviews were done. They added that
due to more stringent and demanding procedures, especially
for some former visa waiver countries, there is a large
backlog of visa applications. Wright said that when security
is the issue, there should be harmonization between the U.S.
and Canada. The U.S. asked about the wisdom of Canada not
requiring visas for South Koreans, particularly given reports
that South Korean women are smuggled through Canada into the
U.S. to work in the sex trade. The DPM acknowledged that
Canada had recently reconfirmed its position of not requiring
visas of South Koreans, but she said she would consult with
the Minister of Immigration on this U.S. question and
concern.
¶7. (SBU) When discussion turned to the Windsor-Detroit
Gateway and what seems to be a rather long lead time (until
2013) to actually implement any of the long-term solutions
currently on the table, DPM McLellan warned that the USG and
GOC should remain objective and not prejudge the five options
currently being considered. She added that the process is
underway (beginning with the announcement of contracts for
environmental impact assessments) and should be allowed to
move forward. The DPM and her staff suggested that President
Bush and Prime Minister Martin should continue to underscore
the importance for both nations of finding a solution to
easing congestion at the Windsor-Detroit corridor. Agencies
of both governments are currently implementing short-term
solutions to meet the 25 Percent Challenge (to reduce transit
times by 25 percent over 12 months) announced during the
December 2004 Ridge-McLellan meetings.
¶8. (SBU) The U.S. and Canada have identified the
Buffalo-Fort Erie crossing as the potential site for a pilot
land pre-clearance project. This pilot presents a different
sort of challenge than that at Windsor-Detroit, however, in
that it envisions national enforcement officers operating on
foreign territory: Canadian CBSA on the U.S. side, and U.S.
CBP in Canada. There are many vexing questions concerning
this arrangement, including the extent of authorities
(search, detain, arrest), immunities, and foremost perhaps,
the carrying of firearms. Other problems include the
question of whether or not a person intending to cross the
border would be allowed to withdraw once an inspection has
started. Secretary Chertoff acknowledged the difficulty
posed by the asymmetrical authorities currently exercised by
CBP and CBSA. Rob Wright said that mechanisms could be
agreed upon, such as targeting, that would allow the project
to work. DHS staff explained that a study of the Buffalo
pre-clearance pilot is underway. Operational analysis must
be done, with a view to identifying the greatest facilitation
and maximization of resources. A progress report is
anticipated in May. All agreed that a way can be found to
allow the pilot project to go forward.
¶9. (SBU) Looking at opportunities for future collaboration,
Rob Wright said that Canada's National Security Policy will
continue to bind the U.S. and Canadian security strategies
ever closer together. The Bush-Martin and Ridge-McLellan
meetings in December 2004 were important steps in creating
the environment to build stronger security ties. The March
23 "Trio" meeting in Texas would provide another opportunity.
Wright commented that domain awareness, the broadening of
shared procedures at the borders, and economic imperatives
should tie the countries together. Secretary Chertoff and
DPM McLellan will be in Texas for the roll out of the
Security and Prosperity Partnership.
¶10. (U) Secretary Chertoff and DPM McLellan (and the British
Home Secretary via pre-recorded video) held a press
conference announcing the TOPOFF 3 exercise April 4 - 8 that
will simulate a terrorist attack to test emergency plans and
procedures. The U.S., Canada, and the United Kingdom are the
principal participants with 13 other countries, including
Mexico, as observers. In their press statements the
Secretary and DPM emphasized the U.S.-Canadian partnership to
SIPDIS
thwart terrorism while at the same time facilitating the free
flow of legitimate commerce and people.
¶11. (U) Comment: This was a successful first meeting
between Secretary Chertoff and DPM McLellan, which will help
them move through a full bilateral agenda. There remain,
however, many legal (enforcement authorities, privacy issues)
and political (sovereignty) hurdles to be overcome in
achieving optimal cooperation on border security.
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa
DICKSON