

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA590, 2005 SPECIAL 301 REPORT FROM OTTAWA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA590.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA590 | 2005-02-25 15:51 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
251551Z Feb 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000590
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DEPT FOR EB/TPP/IPE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD KIPR CA CBSA RCMP
SUBJECT: 2005 SPECIAL 301 REPORT FROM OTTAWA
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The regulatory picture on IPR has not
changed much from earlier years, however Canada is moving to
address many of the issues raised in the Special 301
submissions, even though results are unlikely to be visible
before the end of April. On the headline issues of
enforcement and WIPO ratification, there is incremental
progress. Canada continues to inch toward WIPO
ratification, with legislation due this spring. Departments
responsible for IPR issues are also working to develop more
effective cooperation on enforcement, but are not seeking
greater enforcement powers at the border at this point. End
Summary.
¶2. Econoffs met with representatives of FAC, Industry
Canada, International Trade, Health Canada (HC), the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), the Patent Medicine Prices
Review Board (PMPRB), and the Canadian Border Services
Agency (CBSA) to get their perspective on public submissions
under Special 301 and the state of Canadian IPR law in
general. Under the caveat that GOC finds the Special 301
process "deeply flawed", GOC officials responded to the
points in the public submissions and gave an update on the
status of intellectual property protection in Canada.
-----------------------------------------
PhRMA Comments on Patents: GOC Response
-----------------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) Data exclusivity: In December, Industry Canada
published its proposed regulation to allow for longer data
protection for patented medicines. At the same time, Health
Canada has published complementary regulations that would
circumscribe industry's ability to patent incremental
innovations in existing drugs in a practice commonly known
as "evergreening". Public comments on these regulations are
due February 24th. Under the proposed rules, any Health
Canada reliance on proprietary data in judging a generic
application engages the protection period. HC is also
proposing eight years of data exclusivity (three more years
than the current five) and an extra six years for pediatric
information. (Comment: Canadian patent-based industry
reps have told us that in general their industry is happy
with the extended data exclusivity and resigned to tighter
controls on 'incremental innovation.' End Comment).
¶4. (SBU) International Trade Canada (ITCan) and Health
Canada representatives disputed PhRMA's argument that brand-
name manufacturers are legally vulnerable even when they
comply with Canadian Notice of Compliance rules, saying
that, while lawsuits are underway, no decisions have been
reached and therefore it is too early to claim injury to the
industry. They also commented that the pharmaceutical
industry's claims of damages do not take into account the
public costs of using NOC to delay legitimate generic drugs.
¶5. (SBU) Approval times: Health Canada officials
described their efforts to streamline the approval process,
noting their appreciation for FDA's advice and assistance.
In the past year, Health Canada has hired new staff and
adopted some of FDA's practices, such as assignment of a
'point person' to guide each submission through the process,
and a move toward team reviews of submissions. Over 70%
of the existing backlog has been eliminated, and Health
Canada is aiming for on-time review in the near future.
¶6. (SBU) Price controls: Industry Canada reiterated that
Canadian drug prices are in line with OECD prices and that
price differentials also reflect the U.S. and Canadian GDP
per capita differential of roughly 40 percent. (Comment: the
first point is true by definition, since PMPRB generally
sets prices at about the OECD median. The second point,
which we have heard before, is dubious. Canada's per capita
GDP is only about 20% below the U.S. figure; moreover, as
drug costs are assumed by provincial health plans, it is
hard to see why consumer disposable income is a factor. End
comment.)
¶7. (SBU) Patent term restoration: Industry Canada and
Health Canada officials acknowledged that this is a long-
term concern for PhRMA, and noted that PhRMA has had the ear
of several senior government officials on the issue. Canada
is not obligated under WIPO to offer patent term restoration
and has no current plans to do so. Nevertheless, Industry
and Health Canada officials understand that the lack of
patent term restoration affects the investment climate for
pharmaceutical companies. They are optimistic that the
issue will become less pressing as the drug approval process
in Canada becomes faster.
¶8. (SBU) Patent protection for higher lifeforms: Canadian
courts have prohibited the patenting of higher lifeforms.
The GOC has no plans to amend the Patent Act to overrule
that decision. However, Industry Canada experts argue that,
as several Supreme Court Justices pointed out, patenting of
genes offers adequate if indirect protection to
bioengineered life forms. Industry Canada experts noted
that the biotech industry did not mention this issue in a
recent meeting with Industry Minister Emerson.
¶9. (SBU) Access to medicines: GOC officials were puzzled by
the PhRMA comments that "implementation must be in line with
both parts of the WTO decision", as they believe this point
is explicitly covered in both Canadian legislation and draft
regulations.
-------------
Enforcement
-------------
¶10. (SBU) IT Canada and other GOC officials argue that the
enforcement picture in Canada has measurably improved
because of more effective coordination within the existing
legal structure. The GOC has formed an interdepartmental
working group consisting of ITCan, Industry Canada, Canadian
Heritage, the RCMP, CBSA, Justice, and Public Safety and
Emergency Preparedness Canada to coordinate enforcement of
IPR laws. This working group has also met with industry
associations, and GOC representatives are looking forward to
meeting with U.S. officials on STOP.
¶11. (SBU) Since December of 2003, RCMP and CBSA are under
the same minister, a development which has led to greater
cooperation between the agencies. Both CBSA and RCMP
representatives listed increased training and cooperation as
major improvements in IPR enforcement in Canada. A recent 5-
day workshop in Ontario drew over 100 participants, the
largest workshop of its kind in North America. Upcoming
training includes five two-day workshops in 2005 in other
Canadian provinces. The RCMP officials also cited two
continuing joint force operations, Castille in Montreal and
Ocat in Toronto, which have already resulted in the seizure
of large shipments of counterfeit goods. CBSA
representatives highlighted their organization's efforts to
streamline the procedure when they encounter counterfeit
goods, including a standard process for contacting
appropriate officials and determining whether it is GOC's
priority to intercept a particular shipment.
¶12. (SBU) The CBSA representative explained that CBSA
operates on a "risk management" basis using a list of
government priorities, including IPR. Standard procedure
now requires CBSA to detain suspect counterfeit goods until
RCMP or other enforcement agencies are notified and can act.
The CBSA representative also clarified that they can now
look for shipments based on information received from other
law enforcement agencies. Although there is no customs
infraction as such if counterfeit goods are properly
declared, the RCMP representative noted that they almost
always break other laws. He cited as evidence of an
improved enforcement climate the fact that goods no longer
arrive at the Canadian border with declarations that
explicitly identify them as counterfeit.
¶13. (SBU) Justice has also increased IPR training and has
created a network for prosecutors to share case law and
training information. In a positive development, 2004 saw
higher criminal penalties in IPR cases. Two examples were a
C$150,000 fine for a company guilty of selling electrical
goods with fake UL labels and a case where two men were each
fined C$25,000 and sentenced to 60 days in jail for selling
illegal satellite equipment.
------------------
Copyright Reform
------------------
¶14. (SBU) There are no solid developments in Canadian
copyright reform since the US-Canada experts' meeting in
December 2004. Legislation covering WIPO ratification,
access for higher education, ISP liability, and protection
of photos among other issues is currently in the drafting
process. Canadian Heritage expects a bill to be introduced
in Parliament "in the first half of this year", but most
likely not before May, and that the law will probably not
pass this year. In the meantime, the government's reply to
the 2004 Heritage Committee report on copyright reform is
due in April. This report will most likely reflect the
substance of what the government plans to table.
¶15. (SBU) On the controversial 2004 filesharing decision,
ITCan said that many observers considered that section 80
sub 2 of existing law seems to address the situation, and
the Finckenstein decision came as a surprise to many
officials. The December private copying tariff decision
(which excluded embedded memory and harddrive copying from
the private copying levy) is expected to be appealed to the
supreme court. If upheld, GOC experts believe it would
eliminate the legal basis for the filesharing decision, in
which Judge Finckenstein relied upon the existence of the
private copy levy as evidence that such copying was not an
infringement. Econ officers reiterated that the best and
simplest solution to the problem remains rapid ratification
of the WIPO treaties.
------------
Conclusion
------------
¶16. (SBU) At this point, the regulatory picture on IPR has
not changed much from recent years. However, Canada is
moving to address many of the issues raised in the Special
301 submissions, even though results are unlikely to be
visible before the end of April. While WIPO ratification
remains a good way off, Canadian IPR officials are no longer
claiming to us that existing Canadian law offers adequate
protection; pressure from the Heritage Committee and the
consternation generated by the filesharing decision make it
likely that legislation will at last come before Parliament
this spring as promised. While its fate under a minority
government is hard to predict, there is strong support among
both Liberals and Conservatives for WIPO ratification; other
issues contained in the bill are likely to prove more
controversial. On enforcement, it is hard to tell yet
whether better enforcement training and coordination will
lead to more seizures at the border; Post would like to hear
from US firms about their experiences so that we can
continue to engage the interdepartmental committee on the
issue. Action request: GOC has requested advance notice of
USTR's decision if possible; post would appreciate a heads
up.
CELLUCCI