

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON92, NZ EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME UNDER REVIEW
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON92.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON92 | 2009-04-09 02:11 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO3135
RR RUEHAST RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHLN RUEHMA RUEHPB RUEHPOD RUEHTM RUEHTRO
DE RUEHWL #0092/01 0990211
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 090211Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5825
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1948
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5488
RUEHAP/AMEMBASSY APIA 0555
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0827
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
RUEHZN/ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000092
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV PGOV KGHG NZ
SUBJECT: NZ EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME UNDER REVIEW
WELLINGTON 00000092 001.2 OF 003
Reftel: 08 Wellington 695
¶1. (SBU) Summary. On December 9, 2008, the newly elected
National-led Government announced its review of the country's
Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). Established by the previous Labour
government, the ETS attracted criticism from many quarters,
including the National Party, for its lack of political consensus
and its potentially adverse impact on economic growth. Insiders
predict that any new legislation will not repeal the existing ETS
but rather amend it to give greater weight to its economic impact.
A harmonized approach to emissions trading with Australia is seen as
desirable by National and both governments have begun to jointly
study this option. End Summary.
PM Key Favors Fiscally Prudent ETS
----------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) Prime Minister John Key believes that humans have
contributed to global warming and that New Zealand should have an
effective system to reduce the country's greenhouse gas emissions
and enable the trading of emission reduction credits. However, PM
Key has stated that he will only support such a system if it does
not punitively impact the New Zealand economy. Before the 2008
election, Key's opposition National Party was critical of the
previous Labour Government's Climate Change Response Amendment Act
2008, which established New Zealand's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)
(reftel). Key argued that Labour's ETS was established without the
due diligence and political debate required to form the political
consensus essential to address a significantly long-term issue, such
as climate change. Additionally, Key asserted that any ETS should
have as a fundamental consideration its impact on domestic economic
growth.
ETS Still in Place, but Under Comprehensive Review
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶3. (SBU) Following the November 2008 election, the newly formed
National-led government chose not to repeal ETS, but rather to
initiate a parliamentary study of the program. On December 9, 2008,
Key announced the creation of a Select Committee of Inquiry (Review
Committee) to review the ETS and consider alternative mechanisms for
addressing climate change. This announcement honored a commitment
made to the hard-right ACT Party to secure its support in forming a
government after the election. While the Review Committee conducts
its examination, the ETS program will remain in force despite
pressure from ACT to suspend its operation. However, the first
stage of the ETS emissions reduction timetable does not commence
until 2010, which leaves some time to review and amend the program.
Scope of ETS Review Committee Inquiry
-------------------------------------
¶4. (U) The Review Committee has announced that, during the course
of its inquiry, it will:
- Hear views from trade and diplomatic experts on the international
relations aspects of this issue;
- Consider the prospects for an international agreement on climate
change post-Kyoto 1, and the form such an agreement might take;
- Require a high-quality, quantified regulatory impact analysis to
identify the net benefits or costs to New Zealand of any policy
action, including international relations and commercial benefits
and costs;
- To identify the central/benchmark projections which are being
used as the motivation for international agreements to combat
climate change; and consider the uncertainties and risks surrounding
these projections;
- Consider the impact on the New Zealand economy and New Zealand
households of any climate change policies, having regard to the weak
state of the economy, the need to safeguard New Zealand's
international competitiveness, the position of trade-exposed
industries, and the actions of competing countries;
- Examine the relative merits of a mitigation or adaptation
approach to climate change for New Zealand;
- Consider the case for increasing resources devoted to New
Zealand-specific climate change research;
WELLINGTON 00000092 002.2 OF 003
- Examine the relative merits of an emissions trading scheme versus
a tax on carbon or energy as a New Zealand response to climate
change;
- Consider the need for any additional regulatory interventions to
combat climate change, whether through an ETS or a new form of
taxation, such as a carbon tax; and
- Consider the timing of the introduction of any New Zealand
measures, with particular reference to the outcome of the December
2009 Copenhagen meeting, the position of the United States, and
actions by the Australian government.
Committee Composition and Timeline
----------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) The Review Committee is comprised of members from many of
the political parties sitting in Parliament with a view to obtaining
a balanced consideration of and consensus on other alternatives.
National, as Parliament's biggest party, has four seats; Labour
three seats; the Green Party, Maori Party, ACT and United Future all
have one seat.
¶6. (SBU) In an unusual move, Key appointed a minister outside of
Cabinet, United Future leader Peter Dunne, to chair Review
Committee. Dunne is Revenue Minister and Associate Health Minister.
It is an unusual appointment because ministers do not usually sit
on committees involving legislation. Key justified the appointment
on the grounds that Dunne is an experienced member of Parliament and
generally considered neutral on this issue. Although the Green
Party questioned how neutral a government minister could be in the
position of chair, Dunne's appointment was generally well-received
inside and outside of parliament. Dunne is pro-ETS and soon after
his appointment stated that "New Zealand needs a robust emissions
trading scheme in place as quickly as possible to reassure
businesses and shore-up our international credibility".
¶7. (U) The Committee held its first meeting on December 18, 2008
and has met several times since. It plans to report back to
Parliament in April/May 2009. The Government intends to pass any
proposed legislation by September 30, 2009, before the scheduled
implementation of the existing ETS program that begins in 2010.
Three Possible Outcomes of the ETS Review
-----------------------------------------
¶8. (SBU) Rob Eaddy, Chief of Staff to Committee Chair Dunne,
offered post three possible scenarios at the conclusion of the
Review Committee process. The most likely outcome, according to
Eaddy, is a proposal to revise the existing ETS in a manner that
earns broad political support and which gives more consideration to
the impact on the domestic economy. Another scenario posited by
Eaddy involves the Committee recommending the imposition of a carbon
tax in lieu of the carbon market feature within an ETS. However,
Eaddy believed this to be the least likely scenario.
¶9. (SBU) Eaddy's third scenario is one in which Australia and New
Zealand create a tandem scheme that recognizes the strengths and
weaknesses of their respective economies. Eaddy added that this
outcome has long been Key's most favored solution and revealed that
Key canvassed this concept with Australian PM Kevin Rudd when they
met on March 2 in Sydney.
GNZ and GOA Announce Talks to Harmonize Plans
---------------------------------------------
¶10. (SBU) Meanwhile, as the Review Committee works toward a
proposed solution, the GNZ and GOA are looking seriously at the
harmonization option. On March 20, NZ Climate Change Minister Nick
Smith and Australia Minister for Climate Change and Water Penny Wong
announced the establishment of a trans-Tasman working group to
explore harmonization of their countries' respective emissions
reduction and carbon trading regimes. According to Smith and Wong,
options include everything from common adoption of key design
elements to a full harmonization. No timelines were set by Smith
and Wong.
¶11. (SBU) Leading NZ business journalist Brian Fallow has, however,
expressed doubt that NZ and Australia can easily reconcile
differences in their respective approaches towards emissions
trading. Fallow asserted that beyond the political rhetoric lays
the reality of various stumbling blocks that may make harmonization
WELLINGTON 00000092 003.2 OF 003
very difficult or perhaps unfeasible under policies. Fallow cited
differences between the two countries in how they each plan to meet
Kyoto targets and how emission units would be traded.
Political Parties on ETS Review
-------------------------------
¶12. (SBU) National's support partner, the ACT Party, opposes any
form of an ETS. ACT believes carbon trading is prone to fraud and
that no case has yet been made to prove that the benefits of an ETS
would exceed the costs. The Labour Party and the Green Party have
both offered to work with the Government on an amended ETS.
Labour's Climate Change spokesman Charles Chauvel acknowledges that
the governing National Party is firmly in the driver's seat on the
ETS review. [Note. Even Labour and the Greens, who have
historically advanced strong pro-environment policies, now realize
that their positions must take into account the realities of the
present global economic situation and its impact on achievable
environmental goals. End Note]. Minister Smith welcomed the Labour
and the Greens respective offers and reaffirmed the Government's
desire to build political consensus on how best to tackle climate
change. Jim Anderton, the solitary Progressive Party MP, supports
an ETS, as does the Review Committee Chair Peter Dunne, United
Future's only MP. The Maori Party has yet to articulate a position
on the ETS.
Insights on NZ's Post-Kyoto Negotiations
----------------------------------------
¶13. (SBU) Tim Groser, New Zealand's Minister for International
Climate Change Negotiations, expressed his disappointment in a March
23 media interview that the December 2008 Posnan talks yielded
little progress toward negotiation of a post-Kyoto agreement.
According to Groser, the best that can be achieved in the Copenhagen
talks planned for December 2009 will be some kind of framework
agreement.
¶14. (SBU) Groser also discussed New Zealand's perspective as it
enters into post-Kyoto negotiations. NZ's greenhouse gas emissions
are "massively in excess of our Kyoto obligations", according to
Groser, "and taking on even more ambitious targets is a tough ask."
In addition, he commented that NZ is uniquely and badly placed among
Kyoto signatories because "there is no technical fix for methane
emitted from livestock." NZ must, stated Groser, take into account
the large percentage of NZ greenhouse gas emissions that are
generated by agriculture (49 percent), and the unavailability of
technology that would allow NZ to reduce those emissions.
¶15. (SBU) Another issue for New Zealand in future negotiations is
forestry, said Groser. He explained that the Kyoto rules assume
that all carbon from trees is released as soon as the trees are cut
down, but that is not true. Consequently, Kyoto imposes a penalty
when trees are cut down, even though they are replanted in another
place. That result penalizes New Zealand, which wants to transfer
more of its forests to marginal hill country.
Comment
-------
¶16. (SBU) Given the current economic situation and the GNZ's desire
to avoid any measures that could negatively affect NZ's export
earnings (which are predominately agriculturally based), we
anticipate the GNZ will study this issue carefully and delay as long
as politically possible the implementation of ETS measures for the
ag sector. The public and much of the political clamor for New
Zealand to meet its Kyoto obligations have quieted since the global
financial crisis. New Zealand environmentalists and the small band
of dogmatic pro-environment politicians are likely to press the
Government towards committing to firm targets in the lead up to
Copenhagen, while NZ and Australia officials examine what is
realistic for both their economies. End Comment.
Keegan