

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08SANJOSE695, COSTA RICA GRANTS REFUGEE STATUS TO CHERE LYN TOMAYKO; MAY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08SANJOSE695.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08SANJOSE695 | 2008-08-26 21:10 | 2011-03-18 21:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
Appears in these articles: http://www.nacion.com/2011-03-18/Investigacion/NotasSecundarias/Investigacion2716690.aspx http://www.nacion.com/2011-03-18/Investigacion/NotasSecundarias/Investigacion2716698.aspx |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0695/01 2392110
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 262110Z AUG 08
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0037
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000695
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DEPT FOR WHA/CEN PRM, DRL, CA and DS/CR/CIL; DOJ for OIA; Panama for
LEGAT
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CASC ASEC PREL PGOV PREF PHUM CS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA GRANTS REFUGEE STATUS TO CHERE LYN TOMAYKO; MAY
SET PRECEDENT FOR FUTURE CLAIMS
REF: A. San Jose 524
¶B. 07 San Jose 1746
¶C. 07 San Jose 1604
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: In an unprecedented move that may have long term
repercussions, Minister of Public Security Del Vecchio granted U.S.
fugitive, Chere Lyn Tomayko, refugee status on July 23, thereby
halting her extradition to the U.S. Tomayko, wanted in Texas to
answer to international child abduction charges, claimed (without
substantiation) that she was a victim of domestic violence and that
the U.S. legal system would be unable to protect her from future
violence if she were extradited. Manipulating the Costa Rican media
and playing to Costa Rica's self-image as a protector of human
rights, Tomayko and her team of supporters were able to persuade Del
Vecchio to confer refugee status even before the Supreme Court had
issued its ruling on Tomayko's extradition. In doing so, the
Minister unilaterally contradicted the long standing extradition
treaty between Costa Rica and the U.S., and opened the GOCR to a
possible avalanche of spurious refugee status requests. The
following is our wrap-up on this case, for the record. END
SUMMARY.
----------
THE ARREST
----------
¶2. (SBU) Tomayko has been wanted since 2000 under a federal
indictment for parental child abduction. She fled to Costa Rica in
1997 with her daughter Alexandria after a protracted custody battle
with the father of the child, Amcit Roger Cyprian. Of note, during
the battle, Tomayko did not allege any domestic violence; she first
raised the issue just before she received refugee status in July
2008, and there is no record of prior domestic violence complaints
against Cyprian. A provisional warrant was obtained when she was
located in the summer of 2007, and she was arrested by Costa Rican
authorities in September 2007 (Refs. A-C). Soon after her arrest
and the start of extradition proceedings, Tomayko and her team of
supporters went into high gear to block her return to the U.S.
----------------------------------------
THE MARRIAGE (TO A COSTA RICAN NATIONAL)
----------------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) Tomayko first attempted to avoid extradition by marrying
her live-in Costa Rican partner (and father of two of her children).
The Costa Rican constitution forbids the extradition of Costa Rican
citizens and an expedited naturalization process exists for the
spouses of Costa Ricans. Marriage is thus often used by individuals
in extremis wishing to avoid having to leave the country. Tomayko
and her partner, after a courtship of five plus years and the birth
of two children, were married inside her prison in April 2008.
However, as the extradition treaty between Costa Rica and the U.S.
stipulates that naturalization proceedings for fugitives must be
suspended while requests for extradition are pending, Tomayko's
position was still insecure.
---------------
THE ALLEGATIONS
---------------
¶4. (SBU) Then, Tomayko shared her story widely and publicly,
building a coalition to help her avoid extradition. With the help
of her legal team, she gained the ear of several sympathetic
governmental and non-governmental groups, including the Public
Defender's Office, the National Women's Institute (Spanish acronym
INAMU), and the Ombudsman's Office of the GOCR. Local media helped
by painting the extradition request as a callous move which would
"separate an abused mother from her children." To all the parties
involved, Tomayko repeated her unsubstantiated allegations of
domestic violence suffered at the hands of Cyprian and her fear that
she and her daughter would be in danger if they were returned to the
U.S.
¶5. (U) NOTE: Tomayko's case already had enjoyed some notoriety in
the local media. This was due to expatriate media outlets
(ironically) claiming that the U.S. Embassy had "protected" Tomayko
from Cyprian since 2002 by allegedly dragging its feet in passing
information to the FBI regarding Tomayko's whereabouts. These
allegations are untrue. END NOTE.
----------------------
THE REQUEST FOR REFUGE
----------------------
¶6. (SBU) Having put together her strategy and her team, Tomayko
formally requested refugee status from the Immigration Director.
However, the Director was unwilling to act on unsubstantiated
allegations of abuse or the idea that the U.S. legal system was
unable to protect her. Finding no legal basis under Costa Rican law
or international law for granting her request, the Director refused
her application and a subsequent appeal.
--------------
THE FINAL PUSH
--------------
¶7. (SBU) With her scheduled July 17, 2008, extradition date drawing
near, Tomayko and her team filed three habeas corpus petitions to
the Supreme Court, postponing her extradition until the Court could
rule. Regrettably, a carnival-like atmosphere prevailed as her
family, supporters, and the Costa Rican media set up shop outside
the prison where she was being held. Meanwhile, more and more
pressure was brought to bear on Minister Janina Del Vecchio to
overrule the Director of Immigration (who reports to her) and grant
refugee status.
¶8. (SBU) Tomayko and her supporters continued to use the domestic
violence issue to portray her and her daughter as victims being
punished unfairly by the U.S. judicial system. None of Tomayko's
supporters questioned the lack of evidence of domestic violence at
the hands of ex-partner Cyprian. Del Vecchio herself acknowledged
to reporters that no inquires were made to the federal judge in
Texas who originally handled the child custody case, to the FBI, or
to any other U.S. authority to verify the abuse allegations, and
offers of assistance from the U.S. Embassy to help establish the
facts were ignored.
¶9. (U) On July 21, the Embassy sent a Diplomatic Note (our third on
the Tomayko case since August 2007) reiterating that there were no
allegations of domestic abuse against Cyprian, and that he had no
police or criminal record. The Note also stressed that Tomayko
could present her arguments before the appropriate U.S. court, and
that there were many legal and social organizations in the U.S. that
could provide protection against domestic violence or abuse, if any
were proven. The Note expressed our concern about the implications
from the habeas corpus petitions which could (if accepted) make
Costa Rica a safehaven for law breakers from other countries.
Finally, the Note reminded the GOCR that per our bilateral
extradition treaty, naturalization proceedings should be suspended
until any related extradition request had been adjudicated. (Note
No. 123 emailed to WHA/CEN on August 18.)
-----------------------
THE UNILATERAL DECISION
-----------------------
¶10. (SBU) On July 23, with the expected Supreme Court ruling just
days away, Del Vecchio held a press conference to announce that she
was granting refugee status to Tomayko in order to protect her human
rights. Del Vecchio implied that Costa Rica "had" to take this
action because 1) it was their duty as a world leader in the
protection of human rights; and 2) the U.S. legal system would not,
or could not, protect Tomayko from her ex-partner. Little thought
was given to the rights of the left-behind parent, Roger Cyprian, or
the arguments presented in our Diplomatic Note. In fact, during a
phone conversation earlier that day on the Tomayko case, Del Vecchio
gave the DCM no hint of what she planned to do.
¶11. (SBU) Del Vecchio held firm when the Ambassador and DCM met with
her and Vice Minister Ana Duran on July 24. The Ambassador and DCM
expressed USG disappointment with her ruling, and concern about the
damaging precedent it could set for Costa Rica. Del Vecchio stood
by her decision (and her right as Minister, to act unilaterally,
without consulting more widely in the government). She maintained,
as she had said in her press conference, that the Tomayko ruling was
a "one-time decision".
¶12. (SBU) Late on July 24, the Embassy issued a strongly-worded
statement echoing what the Ambassador and DCM had told the Minister
in private, i.e., expressing disappointment in the Minister's
decision, defending U.S. commitment to human rights, and raising
concern about the implications of the legal precedent being set
(text forwarded to WHA that day). However, the die was cast. Given
the Minister's decision, the Supreme Court ruled on July 25 that
Tomayko could not be extradited as a refugee and she was freed. On
July 26, even President Arias was applauding the decision as a
"sovereign" act to "protect human rights," while supportive
commentators were noting the "historic" nature of the decision.
-------------------------------
COMMENT: A DANGEROUS PRECEDENT?
-------------------------------
¶13. (SBU) Despite the legal arguments, Del Vecchio made a clearly
political decision, which resonated with the Costa Rican body
politic, including the President. In a later conversation with the
Ambassador, Del Vecchio made it clear she had strong personal
reasons to be receptive to Tomayko's concerns. However, as some
Costa Rican legal commentators have already noted (and as MFA staff
have worried to us in private), her ruling may have set a dangerous
precedent, leading to spurious refugee claims in the future. (In
fact, in another child abduction case, Amcit Nicole Kater has filed
a refugee claim here on behalf of her daughter, Tierra Kater-Gehl,
to prevent Tierra's father from returning the girl to the United
States.) Having established that a petitioner can merely state that
they have been the victim of domestic violence without offering
proof could bring the GOCR more than it bargained for.
Additionally, we are concerned that this case represents a
disservice to those who have legitimate claims to protection from
domestic violence.
¶14. (SBU) We will continue to monitor this situation carefully, and
stronger follow-up action may be required if future extraditions are
placed in jeopardy by the "refugee gambit". Sadly, although Tomayko
has avoided returning to the U.S. to answer for her crime, she
remains a fugitive with outstanding international arrest warrants
against her. She has thus effectively made herself a "prisoner for
life" in Costa Rica.
CIANCHETTE