

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 10BELGRADE19, Serbia: Ambassador's First Meeting with President Tadic
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10BELGRADE19.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
10BELGRADE19 | 2010-01-29 17:50 | 2010-12-09 21:30 | SECRET | Embassy Belgrade |
VZCZCXRO1757
RR RUEHAG RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSL
DE RUEHBW #0019/01 0291750
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
R 291750Z JAN 10
FM AMEMBASSY BELGRADE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0678
INFO EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUZEJAA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 05 BELGRADE 000019
SIPDIS
AMEMBASSY ANKARA PASS TO AMCONSUL ADANA
AMEMBASSY ASTANA PASS TO AMCONSUL ALMATY
AMEMBASSY BERLIN PASS TO AMCONSUL DUSSELDORF
AMEMBASSY BERLIN PASS TO AMCONSUL LEIPZIG
AMEMBASSY BELGRADE PASS TO AMEMBASSY PODGORICA
AMEMBASSY HELSINKI PASS TO AMCONSUL ST PETERSBURG
AMEMBASSY ATHENS PASS TO AMCONSUL THESSALONIKI
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL VLADIVOSTOK
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL YEKATERINBURG
E.O. 12958: DECL: 2020/01/29
TAGS: PREL PGOV SR KV
SUBJECT: Serbia: Ambassador's First Meeting with President Tadic
CLASSIFIED BY: Mary Warlick, Ambassador, State, EXEC; REASON: 1.4(B),
(D)
Summary
-------
¶1. (C) In a January 28 meeting with Serbian President Tadic, the
Ambassador emphasized her desire to expand bilateral cooperation on
defense and economic issues, as well as to increase high-level
contacts between our governments. Tadic welcomed the intent but
expressed frustration that he had not been able to visit Washington
for over four years. Echoing comments made in his public remarks
during the Ambassador's credentialing ceremony (para. 12), Tadic
warned that U.S. policy toward Kosovo threatened democracy in
Serbia by strengthening the nationalist opposition. The Ambassador
reiterated U.S. support for Serbia's EU aspirations and urged
continued strong cooperation with the ICTY. Tadic expressed
appreciation for U.S. support on EU integration and explained that
Serbia was pursuing the remaining ICTY indictees because it was in
its own interest to do so. Similarly, as a Dayton guarantor Serbia
would continue to support the territorial integrity of
Bosnia-Herzegovina, Tadic said. He told the Ambassador that he
would work with Croatian President-elect Josipovic, an old
acquaintance, to address the many difficult issues dividing Serbia
and Croatia. On Kosovo, Tadic emphatically stated that Serbia
would not change its position on its own territorial integrity. He
expressed the desire to pursue a dialogue after the International
Court of Justice renders its advisory opinion, as the current
situation was untenable. The Ambassador responded that the
dialogue should begin now in order to find the best way to manage
reaction to the ICJ's opinion and move forward on the many pressing
issues related to Kosovo. End Summary.
¶2. (SBU) After presenting her credentials on January 28, the
Ambassador had a 45 minute working meeting with President Boris
Tadic. Tadic was accompanied by his foreign policy advisor Jovan
Ratkovic and MFA State Secretary Mirko Stefanovic.
Bilateral
---------
¶3. (C) The Ambassador told Tadic that she was eager to work with
him to build on the strong foundation created by her predecessors,
noting that Vice President Biden's May 2009 visit to Belgrade had
opened a new chapter in our bilateral relations. She said that the
military-to-military relationship was strong, but it was time to
take it to the next level through increased joint training and
exchanges, Serbian contributions to peacekeeping missions, and
participation in NATO Partnership for Peace (PfP) activities. The
Ambassador also told Tadic that she would focus on expanding
economic and business ties, including new investments, and
supporting the completion of Serbia's WTO accession. She also
emphasized her commitment to seek opportunities for additional
high-level contacts between our governments. She noted President
Tadic's visit to UNGA last fall, the recent visits of Defense
Minister Sutanovac and Foreign Minister Jeremic to Washington, and
Interior Minister Dacic's meetings this week. The Ambassador
pointed to two upcoming congressional delegations to Serbia and the
February 10 groundbreaking for the New Embassy Compound (NEC) in
Belgrade as early opportunities to continue our engagement and
further highlight the relationship publicly.
¶4. (C) Tadic said he was pleasantly surprised to hear about the
scheduled groundbreaking event, as he had worked with four
different U.S. ambassadors going back to his tenure as Minister of
Defense to identify a suitable location for the new U.S. Embassy
BELGRADE 00000019 002 OF 005
and facilitate the sale. He commented that he was encouraged to
see countries such as the U.S. and China investing in modern
diplomatic facilities in Belgrade. He also stated that it was time
for the Serbian government to reconstruct its own buildings damaged
during the 1999 NATO intervention.
¶5. (C) Shifting topics abruptly, Tadic voiced a complaint that
despite all the talk of expanding the bilateral relations and the
strong ties between Serbia and the U.S., he himself had not visited
Washington in over four years. (Note: To our knowledge this is
the first time that Tadic has expressed an interest in doing so in
several years.) He commented that concrete results of high-level
engagement were lacking, and cautioned that U.S. policy toward the
Balkans, in particular on Kosovo, had implications for democracy in
Serbia. Recalling his own early involvement in the democracy
movement and the month he had spent in jail for his activism, Tadic
said that his government was committed to continued democratic
reform; it had to contend with a significant nationalist
opposition, however. The Ambassador reiterated the USG's
commitment, following on the Vice President's May 2009 visit, to
sustained bilateral engagement with Serbia on all issues, including
those areas where we do not agree. She offered to continue to
explore possibilities for high-level visits on both sides to keep
our bilateral channels open.
European Integration and ICTY Cooperation
-----------------------------------------
¶6. (C) The Ambassador recalled Vice President Biden's expression
of support for Serbia's European aspirations and congratulated
Tadic on his government's recent achievements with the EU,
including visa liberalization, implementation of the Interim Trade
Agreement, and submission of its membership application. The U.S.
saw the integration of the Western Balkans into the European Union
as a key priority and remained prepared, working with the EU, to
support this process. She underscored the importance of continued
engagement with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former
Yugoslavia (ICTY) and U.S. readiness to support the hunt for Ratko
Mladic and Goran Hadzic.
¶7. (S) Tadic expressed appreciation for U.S. help with the EU
accession process. On ICTY cooperation, he explained that Serbia
was working intensively to capture Ratko Mladic "for our own
reasons," not due to pressure from the international community or
the ICTY, but to demonstrate its own resolve to capture war
criminals. He emphasized Serbia's commitment to reconciliation in
the region, pointing to its responsibilities as a guarantor of
Dayton. He also underscored Serbia's commitment to cooperation
with the U.S. on a range of threats, including organized crime,
corruption, terrorism, and narcotics, pointing to the success of
several recent joint counternarcotics operations. Tadic stated
that undertaking such sensitive operations was politically risky
and Serbia would continue to do the right thing; in return,
however, Serbia hoped for similarly strong bilateral engagement in
other areas and expected support from the U.S. on these efforts
with other countries in the region. The Ambassador expressed U.S.
appreciation for Serbia's strong cooperation in these important
areas and said she would be glad to discuss any areas of specific
concern.
Regional Cooperation
--------------------
BELGRADE 00000019 003 OF 005
¶8. (C) The Ambassador noted the important role that Serbia can and
needs to play on regional relations and stability, particularly
with regard to Bosnia-Herzegovina and Croatia. She conveyed
appreciation for the Serbian government's constructive support of
the Butmir process and urged Tadic to remain engaged with the
parties, including RS leader Milorad Dodik, in particular. She
expressed USG concern about the prospect of any referendum moving
forward in the Republika Srpska. Tadic said that Serbia believed
the preservation of BiH's territorial integrity was paramount; as a
guarantor of the Dayton Accords, Serbia sought a peaceful solution
on constitutional reform that would be consistent with Dayton
principles and preserve the model of two entities, three
constituent peoples. Tadic noted that he was seeking a
parliamentary resolution on Srebrenica to recognize the gravity of
the crimes committed there.
¶9. (C) With regard to Croatia, Tadic said that he had known
President-elect Ivo Josipovic for a long time and wanted to work
with him to address the many different open issues such as the
"huge problem" of refugees and property rights. He said he
expected the U.S. to support Serbian efforts to improve that
relationship and address the outstanding issues. Tadic told the
Ambassador that he would soon visit Albania and commented on the
enormous organized crime problem facing Montenegro, where he also
requested U.S. support. He emphasized that Serbia supported the
independence and territorial integrity of its neighbors in the
region, but many issues needed to be addressed.
¶10. (C) Turning to Kosovo, Tadic told the Ambassador "I must be as
clear as possible with you - Serbia will not change its views on
its territorial integrity. I want to be direct with you, as I have
with your other colleagues. After the International Court of
Justice (ICJ) issues its advisory opinion, we want to pursue
dialogue and find a way to address the issues related to Kosovo, as
the current situation is untenable." The Ambassador responded that
despite our clear differences, the U.S. and Serbia needed to keep
the channels of communication on Kosovo open. While the Vice
President had conveyed our agreement to disagree on Kosovo, it was
important for Serbia to focus on practical ways to improve the
lives of Serbs in Kosovo and on resolving outstanding issues. She
emphasized the need for Serbia to take a responsible and forward
looking approach after the ICJ opinion, consistent with President
Tadic's own forward looking approach toward European integration,
that would not do harm to stability in the region nor to the other
important work on our bilateral agenda. She recommended both sides
begin a dialogue now about how to manage the way forward and said
she hoped to continue discussions with Tadic's foreign policy
advisor, Jovan Ratkovic, on this subject as early as next week.
Comment
-------
¶11. (S) Comment: President Tadic made clear during the meeting
and in his public statement that he does not intend to back down on
Kosovo. At the same time, he demonstrated that he is open to
dialogue and told us what he wants: a warm reception in Washington
and continued high level engagement across the U.S. interagency,
cooperation on sensitive security issues, public support for
Serbia's efforts to improve regional relations, and sensitivity to
the domestic political constraints he faces on Kosovo policy. Now
is the opportune moment to lay out for Tadic and his key foreign
policy advisors what we expect of him, namely a constructive and
coordinated response to the ICJ's upcoming advisory opinion
accompanied by increased pragmatism in establishing a modus vivendi
BELGRADE 00000019 004 OF 005
with Kosovo, and continued forceful engagement with Milorad Dodik
to preserve stability in BiH. In the coming months, high-level
Washington engagement with Tadic will be essential to drive these
messages home. The other sine qua non is a strong, consistent
message from the European Union that continued antagonism and
inflexibility on Kosovo after the ICJ opinion will hamper Serbia's
progress toward membership. End Comment.
¶12. (U) Text of President Tadic's remarks (translation provided by
the Presidency):
ADDRESS BY
HIS EXCELLENCY MR. BORIS TADIC, PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF
SERBIA, ON THE
OCCASSION OF THE PRESENT A TION OF THE LETTERS OF CREDENCE BY HER
EXCELLENCY MRS. MARY WARLICK, AMBASSADOR EXTRAORDINARY AND
PLENIPOTENTIARY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO
THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Belgrade, 28 January 2010
Excellency,
It is my great pleasure to receive the Letters by which the
Honorable Barack Obama, President of the United States of America
is accrediting you as Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary
to the Republic of Serbia.
May I ask you, Excellency, to convey to President Obama my cordial
greetings and the assurances of my highest consideration.
The relationship with the United States of America is one of the
pillars of the foreign policy of the Republic of Serbia. Ever since
the times when the interests of our country in the United States of
America were represented by the diplomat and the well-known
scientist of Serbian origin Mihailo Pupin, the bilateral relations
between our two countries have been characterized by friendship and
alliance at all turning points in the world's history of the
twentieth century. Such relations and all-round cooperation were
damaged at the time of the regime of Slobodan Milosevic. Following
the democratic changed in Serbia, we have restored our close
cooperation which entered a new quality phase after the visit of
Vice-President Biden.
Today, Serbia is a truly democratic country. In the past ten years
of the democratic transition we have successfully implemented many
reforms guaranteeing the respect of human rights, minority rights,
media freedoms and free elections. We are very grateful for the
assistance by the United States of America in this democratization
process in Serbia.
We are particularly satisfied with the successful cooperation that
we established with the United States of America in combating
international terrorism and organized crime.
BELGRADE 00000019 005 OF 005
Excellency,
Large Serbian community in America has for centuries provided a
link between our two countries and contributed to the creation of
American society. Serbia is a sister state with the State of
Illinois and the main partner of the Army of Serbia is the National
Guard of Ohio.
We are particularly pleased with the fact that American companies
are among the biggest foreign investors in Serbia.
Madam Ambassador,
Becoming a full member of the European Union is the strategic goal
of the Republic of Serbia. We are convinced that the European Union
will not be complete until Serbia and other Western Balkan
countries are integrated into it. The support of the United States
of America in that regard is of exceptional importance.
Madam Ambassador,
Serbia will continue to defend its sovereignty and territorial
integrity in Kosovo by political and diplomatic means. We would
like 2010 to be the year of peaceful, compromise and realistic
solution of this issue, after the International Court of Justice
renders its advisory opinion. Despite different positions that we
have regarding the status of Kosovo, we hope that American policy
will respect legitimate Serbian interests and that it will not
jeopardize democracy in Serbia.
At the same time, Serbia is very much concerned about the plans of
Pristina to forcefully establish its rule over the majority-Serb
northern Kosovo. If this strategy were to be implemented it would
have unforeseen consequences for the stability of the region.
Excellency,
Serbia is strongly committed to strengthening the regional
cooperation and good-neighbourly relations. Without a stable,
democratic Serbia it is not possible to imagine the stable and
prosperous Western Balkans. Serbia respects the sovereignty and
territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina, its internal
arrangements defined by the Dayton Accords as well as the European
and Euro-Atlantic integration of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Excellency,
You begin your mission at the very important time for the Republic
of Serbia but also for the further development of the relations
between our two countries. I wish you every success in the
discharge of your responsible duties. l am convinced that with your
knowledge and experience you will make an important contribution to
the development of the overall cooperation between our two
countries.
WARLICK