

Currently released so far... 12478 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AU
ASEC
AE
AF
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ABUD
AFFAIRS
APER
AS
AMED
AY
AG
AR
AJ
AL
AID
AM
AODE
ABLD
AMG
AFIN
ATRN
AGAO
AFU
AN
AA
ALOW
APECO
ADM
ARF
ASEAN
APEC
AMBASSADOR
AO
ASUP
AZ
AADP
ACOA
ANET
AMCHAMS
ACABQ
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
APCS
AGMT
AINF
AIT
AORL
ACS
AFSI
AFSN
ACBAQ
AFGHANISTAN
ADANA
ADPM
AX
ADCO
AECL
AMEX
ACAO
ASCH
AORG
AGR
AROC
ASIG
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
BL
BR
BO
BA
BD
BM
BK
BG
BU
BB
BH
BTIO
BY
BEXP
BP
BE
BRUSSELS
BF
BIDEN
BT
BX
BC
BILAT
BN
BBSR
BTIU
BWC
BMGT
CA
CASC
CVIS
CM
CH
CO
CU
CD
CWC
CI
CS
CY
CMGT
CF
CG
CR
CB
CV
CW
CE
CBW
CT
CPAS
COUNTERTERRORISM
CJAN
CODEL
CIDA
CDG
CDC
CIA
CTR
CNARC
CSW
CN
CONS
CLINTON
COE
CROS
CARICOM
CONDOLEEZZA
COUNTER
CL
COM
CICTE
CIS
CFED
COUNTRY
CJUS
CBSA
CEUDA
CLMT
CAC
COPUOS
CIC
CBE
CHR
CTM
CVR
CITEL
CLEARANCE
CACS
CAN
CITT
CARSON
CACM
CDB
CAPC
CKGR
CBC
EC
EG
EPET
ECON
ETRD
EFIN
EIND
EMIN
ENRG
EAID
EAGR
EUN
ETTC
EAIR
ENIV
ES
EU
EINV
ELAB
ECIN
EFIS
ELTN
EWWT
ECPS
ECONOMIC
ENGR
EN
EINT
EPA
ELN
ESA
EZ
ER
ET
EFTA
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EUMEM
ETRA
EXTERNAL
EI
EUR
EK
ERNG
ENGY
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENERG
EINVEFIN
ENVR
ECA
ELECTIONS
ETC
EUREM
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EURN
ECINECONCS
EEPET
EXIM
ERD
ENVI
ETRC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ETRO
EDU
ETRN
EAIG
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
EIAR
EXBS
ECUN
EINDETRD
EREL
EUC
ESENV
ECONEFIN
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
ETRDECONWTOCS
EUNCH
EINVETC
IZ
IT
IR
IS
IN
IC
IAEA
IO
ICAO
IWC
ID
IV
ISRAEL
IAHRC
IQ
ICTR
IMF
IRS
IDP
IGAD
ICRC
ICTY
IMO
IL
INRA
INRO
ICJ
ITU
IBRD
INMARSAT
IIP
ITALY
IEFIN
IACI
ILO
INTELSAT
ILC
ITRA
IDA
INRB
IRC
INTERPOL
IA
IPR
IRAQI
ISRAELI
INTERNAL
ISLAMISTS
INDO
ITPHUM
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IBET
INR
IEA
IZPREL
IRAJ
ITF
IF
KDEM
KU
KPAL
KNNP
KCRM
KZ
KN
KS
KJUS
KTFN
KSCA
KV
KISL
KPAO
KPKO
KIRF
KTIA
KIPR
KFLO
KFRD
KTIP
KAWC
KSUM
KCOM
KAID
KE
KTDB
KMDR
KOMC
KWBG
KDRG
KVPR
KTEX
KGIC
KWMN
KSCI
KCOR
KACT
KDDG
KHLS
KSAF
KFLU
KSEO
KMRS
KSPR
KOLY
KSEP
KVIR
KGHG
KIRC
KUNR
KIFR
KCIP
KMCA
KMPI
KBCT
KHSA
KICC
KIDE
KCRS
KMFO
KRVC
KRGY
KR
KAWK
KG
KFIN
KHIV
KBIO
KOCI
KBTR
KNEI
KPOA
KCFE
KPLS
KSTC
KHDP
KPRP
KCRCM
KLIG
KCFC
KTER
KREC
KTBT
KPRV
KSTH
KRIM
KRAD
KWAC
KWMM
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMS
KX
KMIG
KRCM
KVRP
KBTS
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNAR
KPWR
KNPP
KDEMAF
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KGIT
KPAI
KTLA
KFSC
KCSY
KSAC
KTRD
KID
KOM
KMOC
KJUST
KGCC
KREL
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KFTFN
KO
KNSD
KHUM
KSEC
KCMR
KCHG
KICA
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KCGC
KWWMN
KPAK
KWNM
KWMNCS
KRFD
MOPS
MCAP
MPOS
MARR
MO
MNUC
MX
MASS
MG
MY
MU
ML
MR
MILITARY
MTCRE
MT
MEPP
MA
MDC
MP
MAR
MASSMNUC
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MD
MI
MEETINGS
MK
MCC
MEPN
MRCRE
MAS
MIL
MASC
MC
MV
MTCR
MIK
MUCN
MEDIA
MERCOSUR
MW
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MTRE
MEPI
MQADHAFI
MAPS
NO
NATO
NL
NP
NZ
NSF
NI
NH
NG
NAFTA
NU
NASA
NR
NATOPREL
NSSP
NSG
NA
NT
NW
NK
NPT
NPA
NATIONAL
NPG
NSFO
NS
NSC
NE
NGO
NDP
NIPP
NRR
NEW
NZUS
NC
NAR
NV
NORAD
OTRA
OPCW
OVIP
OAS
OREP
OPIC
OIIP
OPRC
ODIP
OEXC
OPDC
OSCE
OIC
OSCI
OECD
OFDP
OFDA
OMIG
OPAD
OFFICIALS
OVP
OIE
OHUM
OCS
OBSP
OTR
OSAC
ON
OCII
OES
PGOV
PREL
PHUM
PTER
PINS
PINR
PREF
PK
PROP
PA
PARM
PBTS
PMAR
PM
PGIV
PE
PRAM
PHUH
PHSA
PL
PNAT
PO
PLN
PAO
PSA
PHUMPGOV
PF
PEL
PBIO
POLITICS
PHUMBA
PAS
POL
PREO
PAHO
PMIL
POGOV
POV
PAK
PNR
PRL
PG
PREFA
PSI
PINL
PU
PARMS
PRGOV
PALESTINIAN
PAIGH
POLITICAL
PARTIES
POSTS
PROG
PORG
PTBS
PUNE
POLICY
PDOV
PCI
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PBT
PP
PS
PY
PTERE
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PRELP
PSEPC
PGOVE
PINF
PNG
PGOC
PFOR
PCUL
POLINT
PGGV
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PGOVLO
PHUS
PDEM
PECON
PROV
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RELATIONS
RW
RO
RM
RP
ROOD
RICE
RUPREL
RSO
RCMP
REACTION
REPORT
REGION
RIGHTS
RF
RFE
RSP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
ROBERT
SU
SCUL
SNAR
SOCI
SF
SA
SHUM
SENV
SP
SR
SY
SANC
SC
SMIG
SZ
SARS
SW
SEVN
SO
SEN
SL
SNARCS
SNARN
SI
SG
SN
SH
SYR
SAARC
SPCE
SHI
SCRS
SENVKGHG
SYRIA
SWE
STEINBERG
SIPRS
ST
SNARIZ
SSA
SK
SPCVIS
SOFA
SIPDIS
SAN
TC
TI
TBIO
TH
TSPL
TRGY
TSPA
TPHY
TU
TW
TS
TAGS
TK
TX
TNGD
TZ
TF
TL
TV
TN
TD
TIP
TR
TP
TO
TT
TFIN
THPY
TERRORISM
TINT
TRSY
TURKEY
TBID
US
UK
UNGA
UP
UZ
UNMIK
USTR
UNO
UNSC
UN
UNESCO
UNAUS
UNHRC
UY
UG
UNHCR
UNCND
USOAS
USEU
UNICEF
UNEP
UV
UNPUOS
UNCSD
USUN
UNCHR
UNDC
USNC
UE
UNDP
UNC
USPS
USAID
UNVIE
UAE
UNFICYP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNIDROIT
UNDESCO
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05SANJOSE1828, PRESIDENT'S PARTY PUBLICLY SUPPORTS CAFTA-DR, BUT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05SANJOSE1828.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 SAN JOSE 001828
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
WHA/CEN
EB FOR WCRAFT, BLAMPRON
E FOR DEDWARDS
WHA/EPSC FOR KURS, LGUMBINER
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR RVARGO, CPADILLA, AMALITO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECPS ECON PREL PGOV SOCI CS
SUBJECT: PRESIDENT'S PARTY PUBLICLY SUPPORTS CAFTA-DR, BUT
OUTLOOK FOR NECESSARY IMPLEMENTATION LEGISLATION UNCLEAR
REF: (A) SAN JOSE 01774
(B) SAN JOSE 01639
¶1. (U) Summary. Members of President Pacheco's Social
Christian Unity Party (PUSC) are publicly urging him to
send the United States-Central American-Dominican Republic
Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) to the Legislative Assembly
as soon as possible, despite the continued failure to pass
the Fiscal Reform bill (Note: President Pacheco has made
passage of fiscal reform a condition for his sending CAFTA-
DR to the Assembly for ratification [Ref A]). PUSC
representatives also requested that the Administration send
the necessary CAFTA-DR-related legislation; including bills
to allow competition in the telecommunications and
insurance markets. Currently, these industries are run by
the state-owned monopolies, the Costa Rican Institute of
Electricity (ICE) and the National Institute of Insurance
(INS), respectively. The gradual opening of these markets
to competition is required to implement the trade
agreement. Other legislation, although not required to
implement CAFTA-DR, is necessary to increase the global
competitiveness of Costa Rican companies. End Summary
¶2. (U) After meeting on August 8, 2005, the PUSC Assembly
members (deputies) officially gave a "public vote of
support" to CAFTA-DR. They also urged the President to
send the trade agreement and information about the
complementary agenda to the Assembly. "We have always been
respectful of the Administration and its decisions, but we
believe that it is necessary to be able to move forward on
this issue in Congress," said Lillian Salas, PUSC deputy
and party leader, after the meeting with her fellow
deputies. The PUSC deputies also want to discuss the
legislative projects related to implementation of CAFTA-DR,
such as those opening the telecommunications and insurance
markets to competition.
--------------------------------------------- -----------
Legislation Required to Implement CAFTA-DR in Costa Rica-
THE PARALLEL or IMPLEMENTATION AGENDA
--------------------------------------------- -----------
¶3. (U) The proposed legislation that will open the
telecommunications and insurance markets to competition as
required by CAFTA-DR has not yet been sent to the Assembly.
The Administration has referred to these projects as the
"parallel agenda" or the "implementation agenda" to CAFTA-
DR - that legislation that must be completed to comply with
the requirements of CAFTA-DR. Based on various sources,
including personnel within the GOCR, the telecommunications
legislation, known as the "Telecommunications Act," is
being managed by the Ministries of Foreign Trade (COMEX)
and Finance with input from the various interested parties
such as ICE. Reportedly, neither legislative project has
been finalized by the Administration. Gilberto Barrantes,
the Economy Minister and new Coordinator of the President's
Economic Council, stated that he expects a first draft of
the Telecommunications Act this week. However, he called
attention to the importance of moving forward on the
proposed Law to Strengthen and Modernize ICE (see paragraph
7).
¶4. (U) One month ago, Finance Vice Minister David Fuentes
told Econoff that the insurance and telecommunications
legislation would be sent to the Assembly by the end of
August 2005. However, lack of progress on the
Telecommunications Act has caused a delay. Finance
Minister Federico Carrillo stated that he expects the
telecommunications legislation to be presented in November
and maintains that the insurance legislation will be ready
in August. COMMENT: It is clear that the
telecommunications legislation is more complex and
politically sensitive than the insurance legislation.
However, the need to proceed in the telecommunications
arena is, arguably, more urgent because, under CAFTA-DR,
the opening of the telecommunications market starts on
January 1, 2006, while January 1, 2008 marks the opening of
the insurance market. END COMMENT.
--------------------------------------------- --
Legislation to Improve Global Competitiveness -
THE COMPLEMENTARY AGENDA
--------------------------------------------- --
¶5. (U) Other legislation that is not required to implement
CAFTA-DR, but is necessary to ensure Costa Rica can take
advantage of the opportunities created by the agreement, is
referred to as the "complementary agenda" (Ref B). To
date, we have been told by the GOCR that the complementary
agenda will focus on upgrading infrastructure (mostly rural
roads and highways) and increasing the competitiveness of
small- and medium-size enterprises. Costa Rica has
arranged for approximately USD 209 million of funding for
these initiatives with the majority of the resources being
provided by a USD 117 million loan from the Inter-American
Development Bank (IDB).
¶6. (U) Other smaller loans will be provided by the World
Bank and the Central American Bank of Economic Integration
(BCIE) to fund education projects and improve customs
systems, respectively (Ref B). COMMENT: Legislative
Assembly approval of these loans is necessary prior to
disbursal of funds. To date, no legislation has been
provided to the Assembly on any of these loans. However,
based on information provided to Econoff, the necessary
legislation should be sent to the Assembly within the next
two months. END COMMENT.
--------------------------------------------- --------
THE STATUS OF THE LAW TO STRENGTHEN AND MODERNIZE ICE
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶7. (U) At the time that Costa Rican negotiators signed
CAFTA-DR in May 2004, it was assumed and reflected in the
text of the agreement that Costa Rica would pass a Law to
Strengthen and Modernize ICE by December 31, 2004. The
Costa Rican negotiators inserted this requirement into the
agreement to enact a law to give ICE sufficient autonomy
and resources to be able to compete against potential
competitors in an open telecommunications market. The
proposed law was introduced in the Assembly prior to the
signing of CAFTA-DR and was referred for review to the
Assembly's Special Mixed Commission for ICE, consisting of
deputies from various parties as well as consultants from
inside and outside the GOCR. This Commission is currently
studying the bill and deciding whether it should be
referred to the Assembly floor for a vote.
¶8. (U) The bill has been stuck in the Commission because
of difficulties surrounding the issues of: (1) distribution
of spectrum frequencies; (2) the amount of taxes, if any,
that ICE will pay to the GOCR; and (3) how the rights to
concessions for use of natural resources will be handled.
There are some members of this commission, such as Gloria
Valerin, a PUSC deputy and President of the Special Mixed
Commission, who would like the bill passed in its current
form, which would give ICE unprecedented autonomy and
special treatment such as rights to most, if not all, of
the spectrum of mobile telecommunications frequencies and
exemption from paying taxes. There are other members of
the Commission, such as Libertarian Movement deputy
Federico Malavassi, who are reluctant to give ICE such
special treatment, which they believe would reduce the
likelihood of any real competition in telecommunications.
COMMENT: Eladio Gonzalez, Adviser to the Commission and a
legal expert who wrote the legislation, told Econoff that
if the Telecommunications Act is completed correctly, i.e.,
a clear regulatory framework is constructed and a strong
and unbiased regulator is established, the passage of the
ICE Modernization bill would not conflict with the
requirements of CAFTA-DR. END COMMENT.
¶9. (U) Valerin, stated, "We will not give an inch. If
they want the complementary agenda, they should approve the
strengthening (of ICE). We are not going to permit the
weakening of ICE in this project." COMMENT: Post believes
that the proposed law in its current form and depending on
the final Telecommunications Law that will be passed, may
result in the inability of Costa Rica to comply with the
equal treatment provisions required by CAFTA-DR. The parts
of the bill that may cause these problems coincide with
those issues already identified in the Mixed Commission's
review. END COMMENT
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶10. (SBU) One key aspect of the legislative projects
associated with the parallel or implementation agenda
should be the creation of a new entity or strengthening of
an existing organization that is independent and capable of
competently regulating the telecommunications and insurance
industries. This is important to ensure that all potential
competitors are treated equally and have the same
opportunities to access the markets, as required by the
spirit and letter of CAFTA-DR. This is no small task since
the GOCR has very little experience in regulating
competitive markets, and the most likely regulator, the
Regulatory Authority of Public Services (ARESEP), is not
considered effective in regulating much simpler sectors.
In addition, ARESEP has its hands full with regulating
everything from taxi fares to gasoline prices.
¶11. (SBU) The pressure to send CAFTA-DR and all related
legislation required for its implementation is mounting,
and it is now clear that if CAFTA-DR were sent to the
Assembly today, there would be enough votes to pass it.
However, many knowledgeable people doubt whether the
Assembly has the ability to create the necessary
legislation to fulfill commitments made in the agreement
(especially in the telecommunications sector) or the
commitment to try to do so in a timely manner.
KAPLAN