Back to
Hufschmid's main page

How do

we distinguish

Truth from
Lies?

"So then I said, 'Don't talk about the Apollo moon landing
hoax because the public is not ready for it' and the idiots fell for
it!"

And how do we determine who to trust?

updated 15 March 2007
by Eric
Hufschmid

After I wrote about the deception in the 9/11 movement,
some people have been ask me, "How can we figure out who to
trust?"

The truth can be placed in the open; exposed naked to the entire
world. The truth does not need any laws to protect it, and it does not
need secrecy to protect it. The truth does not need evidence destroyed,
nor does it need videotapes to be confiscated.

Only lies need secrecy; only lies need protection from laws. Only lies
benefit from fear, secrecy, blackmail, gossip, and confiscation of
evidence.

For example, to determine the truth about the 9/11 attack, we only have
to bring out all of the video recordings, the photographs, the rubble from
the World Trade Center, the seismic data, and the testimony of the
witnesses. By letting us see everything, we will eventually figure out
what happened and who is a liar.

However, the media and government are suppressing some video
recordings, witnesses, scientific analyses, and people (such as myself).
The government also destroyed most of the rubble from the towers, and
there are accusations that they destroyed other evidence also. This
destruction of evidence is proof that they are hiding something.

Nobody destroys evidence or suppresses people if they are trying to
spread the truth. The truth is supported with evidence. The more evidence
we have, the more we can be certain of what the truth is. Therefore, to
spread the truth, expose all evidence.

By comparison, if somebody is promoting a lie, he must suppress the
particular people and information that expose the lie.

The Incubator
Babies

Do you remember the stories circulating in America in 1990 about the
evil Iraqi soldiers who were throwing babies out of their incubators?

There were eyewitnesses to this atrocity, such as this
adorable girl who is holding back tears as she tells the world about those
horrible Iraqis.

Millions of Americans were enraged that the evil Iraqis would
behave in such a savage manner, and this anger helped to bring
support for the war in Iraq.

The glorious, righteous Americans charged off to battle and
slaughtered the evil Iraqis.

Am I allowed to ask, how many babies were thrown out of the
incubator? Am I an incubator baby
denier for asking such a question?

Some people claim that zero babies
were thrown out of incubators, and that the entire story is a hoax in
order to enrage the Americans. Here are two articles about it, in case you
never heard of this:

www.csmonitor.com/2002/0906/p25s02-cogn.html

and:
www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/3589/us-iraq-lie.html

Are the people who make these accusations Incubator Baby Deniers? Should they be arrested?
Should they be told to shut up?

The truth about the incubator baby story does not need laws to protect
it. There is no reason to tell anybody to be quiet about it. The truth
about the incubator babies will come out when we expose all
evidence, not when we tell people to shut up.

Ignore
the pressure to hide evidence

Lots of people and organizations claim to be "truth seekers" in regards
to 9-11. However, if they were truly honest, they would encourage people
to look at all of the evidence.

For example, the MoveOn organization
ignores some of the most important evidence of 9-11. The Air America radio network also ignores lots of
critical information and people.

It is the ordinary, unknown citizens who pass out videos, books, and
web sites. If this world improves, it will be because of those unknown
citizens who are ignoring the large organizations and passing out the
suppressed information to their friends and neighbors.

Should I keep quiet on some
issues?

Occasionally somebody will advise me to stop talking about one or both
of these issues:

The Apollo moon landing

The Holocaust

Why should I ignore those two subjects? How does the truth on those
subjects benefit by suppressing discussions of them?

I have been given two, completely different sets of reasons as to why I
should remain quiet, depending on whether the person telling me to keep my
mouth shut promotes the official story. The two groups of reasons are:

1) The people who tell me
that Apollo astronauts really did land on the moon, and the official
Holocaust story is 99% accurate, tell me to shut my mouth
because...

I will ruin my reputation.

I will hurt everybody else's reputation in the 9-11 movement.

2) The people who tell me that
Apollo and the Holocaust are indeed hoaxes tell me to shut my mouth
because...

Most people are too stupid to understand these issues, so I would
be wasting time that could be put to more productive uses.

The Zionists will attack me, maybe have me arrested, maybe kill
me.

Now let's consider whether I should follow their advice and keep
quiet about these issues.

Case 1: The Apollo astronauts really
did land on the moon, and the official Holocaust story is at least 99%
accurate.

Consider the issue of mercury dental fillings. The
official story is that these fillings are safe. Will I ruin my
reputation for asking questions about their safety?

Well... I will ask some questions, and then you can let me know if I
just ruined my reputation.

Questions about mercury dental filling:

• Do molecules from the
fillings tear off once in a while? If so, do any of those molecules
get into our blood, or do they merely pass through our digestive
system?

• If some mercury does get into our
blood, does it cause any harm to us?

• Have fillings been proven to be 100%
safe, or are they considered safe by corporate executives simply
because the amount of mercury that gets into us is so small that they
decided not to worry about it?

OK... I just asked some questions about mercury dental fillings.
Did I ruin my reputation?

Let me now ask some questions about the Vietnam War.

Questions about the Vietnam War:

I know a man who is a few years older than me. He was drafted and
sent to fight in the Vietnam war. However, he had no desire to kill
Vietnamese. He did not understand why he should consider the Vietnamese
to be his enemy.

He told me that in his small group of about six men, only their
leader was interested in the war.

He told me that when their leader took them out into the forest, they
had to pretend that they were interested in fighting the war, but often
their leader would send them out on their own. This group of about 6
young men would go out into the forest, find a nice tree to sit under,
relax, and often play cards.

When evening came, they would go home and tell their leader that they
had killed a few Vietnamese.

There are many significant lessons to learn from this man. Two of
them are:

1) Many of the deaths reported during the Vietnam War may have been
phony. Some news reports claim that the American military killed 3
million Vietnamese. For all we know, most of those dead Vietnamese were
"killed" by soldiers who were actually playing cards.

2) The American military believes that they were chased out of
Vietnam because there was not enough support for the war among the
American people, but they may have been chased out of Vietnam because
most American soldiers had no interest in the war.

Now I am ready to ask my questions about the Vietnam War:

Did Americans really kill 3 million Vietnamese?

How many Vietnamese were killed by Americans, and how many were
killed by other Vietnamese?

Am I anti-Vietnamese for asking those questions? Have I ruined my
reputation or the reputation of other 9/11 researchers for asking those
questions? Am I anti-American for asking those questions? Am I a
Vietnam War Denier for asking those questions?

If it is acceptable for me to ask questions about dental fillings and
the Vietnam War, why can't I ask questions about Apollo or World War II?

Case
2: Apollo and the Holocaust are indeed hoaxes.

It should be obvious that if these are hoaxes, then the
pressure on me to shut my mouth is to prevent me
from exposing the lies.

The truth does not need
suppression

The US military has no reason to hide information about the Vietnam
War... if they want the truth about the war to be known.

However, if they want to hide the truth, then they will need to
suppress people, questions, and evidence. The same applies to the North
Vietnamese and Chinese governments.

The only way we will really know what was going on with the Vietnam War
is if all of the governments stop their suppression of information.

Governments justify their suppression of information on the grounds
that they are protecting national security. In reality, every government
is protecting their incompetence, their criminal activity, and their
embarrassing mistakes.

It is OK to discuss the Vietnam
War

There is nothing wrong with asking questions about the Vietnam War, and
there is nothing wrong with asking how many people died.

There is nothing wrong with asking questions about the Civil War,
either, and there's nothing wrong with asking if George Washington really
did have his missing teeth replaced with pieces of wood, and whether he
really did chop down a cherry tree.

So why is it wrong to ask questions about what was going on inside
those Nazi prison camps? Why is it wrong to ask how many Jews died in
those prison camps? If Jews have nothing to hide, why are they trying to
stop people from discussing this issue? Why don't they proudly announce to
the world,

"Go ahead and look closely at the Nazi
prison camps. You will find that we Jews have been honest about them;
that we have been telling you the truth."

I don't see how we are helping the human
race by remaining silent on any issue.

How about if you look into Apollo and the Holocaust, and you
decide for yourself if they are hoaxes. I have some documents on my
Internet site to get you started, such as this page,
which is one in a series of articles here.

Laws
against Apollo Denial

What would you think if the United States government passed a law that
allowed it to arrest people who did not believe Apollo astronauts landed
on the moon? Would you approve of a government that put "Apollo
Deniers" in jail?

Would you approve of our government arresting people who do not believe
Oswald killed Kennedy? Would you support a law against "Lee Harvey
Oswald Denial"?

The people who are described as "Historians" often disagree with each
other on historical details. Since they can't agree on the official
version, why should we expect the common people to agree? To complicate
the issue, every nation has a slightly different version of history.

To add even more absurdity to this issue, history sometimes changes
when a nation gets new government officials. An example is the change in
Russian history when Stalin replaced Lenin.

We are not going to make our history books more accurate by arresting
people who disagree with some arbitrary, official version of history.

Does any government really believe
that we need laws against Holocaust Denial?

There is currently a man named Ernst Zundel who was taken from America,
sent to Canada, and then sent to Germany for a trial, supposedly because
he is a Holocaust denier. In February 2007, Zundel was sent to jail for 5
years:
www.cbc.ca/world/story/2007/02/15/zundel-germany.html

Could any government possibly be so stupid that they believe they are
helping the world by arresting "Holocaust Deniers"? I don't think
so.

The arrest of Holocaust Deniers seems to be an attempt to frighten people into remaining silent about the
Holocaust. And the only reason for this is because the Holocaust promoters
are trying to hide something; they are trying to protect a lie.

The truth about the Holocaust does not come out when people are
arrested. Rather, lies about the Holocaust are protected when people are
arrested.

The truth about the Holocaust will come out when all of the photos and
information is released, and when we are allowed to discuss the
information.

People who question the official story of the Holocaust are not
Holocaust Deniers. Rather, they are Holocaust Truth Seekers,
or HoloHoax Exposers.

Are Holocaust trials a
deception?

As I mentioned in my document "To get away
with crimes, pretend to be a crime fighter", the deception with 9-11
and other large crimes is much more complex than my simple example of a
car thief.

Let me give you a few possible examples of what is going on with the
arrest of Ernst Zundel.

• The Zionists are worried about
Ernst Zundel is exposing the HoloHoax, and so they are trying to use him
as an example to show us that they control the world, and we better keep
our mouths shut or we will go to jail, also.

• Zundel, Germar Rudolf, and most of the
other Holohoax exposers are actually Zionists, or working with the
Zionists, and they have agreed to be arrested in order to create the impression that the Zionists have
such incredible control over the world that they can drag HoloHoax
Exposers from one country to the next, and then put them in jail.

• They use the arrest of Zundel to attract
our attention while they quietly put a real HoloHoax Exposer in jail.

How do we determine if Zundel,
Rudolf, or others are real HoloHoax Exposers? How do we know who to trust?

To understand this, imagine what a trial for an "Apollo Denier" would
be like. For example, Richard Hoagland, who frequently appears on
coast-to-coast radio, believes that Apollo astronauts landed on the moon,
but that NASA faked many of the photographs in order to cover up the
ancient civilizations the Apollo astronauts discovered on the moon.

Hoagland could be classified as an Apollo Denier because he is
accusing NASA of faking photos, lying to the world, and covering up the
greatest discovery of the human race; namely, that there are alien
civilizations on both the moon and Mars.

If the government were to arrest Richard Hoagland for Denying Apollo,
the trial would have to be a sham
because both the government and Richard
Hoagland would have to lie in order to defend themselves.

The only reason the government would want to arrest Richard Hoagland is
if they wanted to frighten people into thinking that they better not
disagree with the official story of the Apollo moon landing or they may
end up in court.

The government would never arrest a real Apollo investigator because a real Apollo
investigator would have serious evidence that the moon landing was a hoax,
and the government would not want that brought out in the public.

Consider how this applies to the arrest of Holocaust Deniers.

The Jews would never want to arrest a real Holocaust investigator
because he would fight back with serious evidence.

The only people the Jews can safely arrest for Holocaust Denial are the
people who are working with the Jews to create the impression that the
Jews have so much power over the  world that they can arrest anybody
for questioning the Holocaust.

Are the Germans as stupid as they
appear?

In February 2007 a German court sentenced Zundel to jail for five years. How could the Germans be so stupid as
to put an old man in jail at taxpayers expense simply because he disagrees
with the official story of the Holocaust? Can't the German people think of
a better way to spend their tax money?

Here are some possibilities in regards to Zundel:

• Blackmail

Perhaps Zundel is an honest citizen who questioned the Holocaust. The
Zionists realized that he was a potential threat, so a few of them
pretended to be his friend in order to set him up for blackmail.

Ingrid Rimland, his third wife, may be a Zionist. Watch this short
video about her:
www.iamthewitness.com/video/FrenchConnection_3.wmv

Perhaps the Zionists lured Zundel into doing something that he could
be blackmailed over, such as pedophilia, and then they gave him an
offer: either go to jail for pedophilia, or go to jail as a Holocaust
denier.

Incidentally, Ingrid Rimland is good friends with Dr. Lorraine Day.
Therefore, if Rimland is a Zionist, we have to wonder if Dr. Day is also
a Zionist, or if Rimland is working on ruining Dr. Day.

Since it is almost impossible to lure women into having sex with
children, instead of setting Dr. Day up for pedophilia, Rimland and
others Zionists may be feeding her propaganda about religion, cancer, or
AIDS. If they can fool a person into promoting nonsense, that is almost
as good as setting them up to be blackmailed.

• Corruption in the courts

Perhaps Zundel is an honest citizen who questioned the Holocaust.
Perhaps the Jews are getting away with this absurd arrest because the
Zionists within the American, Canadian, and German courts system made
sure that the only people dealing with Zundel's deportation and trial
were Zionists.

This would allow the Zionists to get away with what would normally be
a very serious crime.

• A Crypto-Zionist

Perhaps Zundel is secretly working with the Zionists. Perhaps he
agreed to be put in jail in order to frighten the Gullible Goyim.

In this case the Zionists don't have to worry about Zundel fighting
the deportation or bringing up real evidence at his trial. Instead,
Zundel would put up a superficial fight. (Here is one
journalist who claims that Zundel is Jewish)

One Jewish newspaper, in this article,
says that Zundel is not really disagreeing with the official story of the
Holocaust. Rather, he simply "hates Jewish people".

Although we cannot believe the media on the Holocaust issue, especially
not the Jewish reporters, it appears as if Zundel does not truly want to
expose the Holocaust. Rather, he puts up only a superficial fight.

This implies that he is working with the Zionists, either because he is
a Crypto-Zionist, or they have blackmailed him.

The truth seekers are not
stupid

One of the peculiar aspects of most of the Holocaust investigators,
9/11 truth seekers, antiwar activists, etc., is that they talk a lot, but
they don't give good arguments, and they never advocate any action.

I used to assume they were stupid, but it makes more sense to accuse
them of being Crypto-Zionists or blackmail victims.

Germar Rudolf supposedly has a Ph.D. in chemistry, and he got it from a
German university, not an American university. He is certain to be above
average intelligence.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germar_Rudolf

In 2002, he published his analysis of the Apollo moon landing:

http://vho.org/tr/2003/1/Rudolf75-81.html

Almost all of us grew up believing that the Apollo moon landing was
real. Only a few people have bothered to analyze the Apollo moon landing
to determine if it was real, or if it was staged here on the earth.

Of all the people who analyzed the Apollo moon landing, most of them
come to the conclusion that it was indeed staged here on the earth.
Only a few people go so far as to
publish a paper to defend the official story. Germar Rudolf is one
of those very few.

I would guess that Rudolf was told to write that article, and he agreed
to do it either because he is a Crypto-Zionist, or because he is one of
their blackmail victims.

Incidentally, I have another Science Challenge about Apollo:
www.EricHufschmid.net/Science_Challenge_26.html

Stand up to the
HoloHoax

FredrickToben,
Ernst Zundel, Germar Rudolf, and almost everybody else who is arrested for
Holocaust denial seems to be either a Zionist, or one of their blackmail
victims

They allow themselves to be arrested in order to frighten the Gullible Goyim into remaining silent
about the HoloHoax.

A clever trick, isn't it?

More on the possibility that David
Irving is part of a Zionist trick to frighten us:
www.erichufschmid.net/HoloHoax/DavidIrvingHoax.html

More on the possibility that Zundel
is part of a Zionist trick to frighten us:
www.iamthewitness.com/Ernst-Zundel-5-years-in-jail.html

The real holocaust investigator seems to be Professor Robert Faurisson:
www.erichufschmid.net/MasqueradeParty/MasqueradeParty.html

Don't be frightened by the Holohoax arrests. What are you; a human or a
mouse?

And take this issue of blackmail seriously. The Zionists are not going
to sit by while people expose their crimes. When somebody tries to expose
the Holocaust, 9/11, or other crimes, they will be contacted by "helpful"
people and "concerned citizens". You should consider all of these people
to be possible Zionists.

Deceptive Romantic
Relationships

There are lots of ways to deceive people. One of the ultimate
sacrifices that a Zionist can make for Israel is to form a long-term
romantic relationship with a Goyim in order to manipulate him, spy on him,
or set him up to be arrested.

This may have been what happened to the former New Jersey governor
McGreevey. The story varies depending on the source, but everybody agrees
that he resigned
in Aug 2004 on the grounds that he is homosexual, and that he had an
affair with a man named Golan Cipel.

Golan
Cipel is an Israeli citizen (the original article has
been erased, so look at the archived copy before it is erased) and
a former lieutenant in the Israeli Navy. Governor McGreevey made Cipel the
head of New Jersey Homeland Security.

One interesting aspect of this case is that an Israeli citizen was
given an important position in America's government. How many nations
allow foreign citizens to get top positions in their government?

I also find it interesting to consider that Cipel is telling the truth
when he says he is heterosexual, and that Governor McGreevey is telling
the truth about his homosexual affair with Cipel.

In such a case, perhaps Cipel volunteered to pretend he is homosexual
in order to manipulate McGreevey into giving him a high level position in
the American government.

If you are heterosexual, imagine the American government asking you to
have a long-term homosexual relationship with an official from some other
nation. They will set you up with the official when he arrives for a
dinner, and you would have to fake a romantic interest in him. If the
official likes you, you will have to move to his nation, carry on a
homosexual relationship with him, and try to get into their government.
Would you volunteer for that type of assignment?

Governor McGreevey resigned on the grounds that he is homosexual, but
perhaps the real reason for his resignation is that he realized that he
was being taken advantage of, and he could not think of any other way to
get out of the mess.

He may have been told that he will be blackmailed if he sends Cipel
home to Israel. Perhaps he was warned that the Mossad will arrange a
suicide or a plane accident if he causes trouble for Israel. So perhaps he
decided to quit politics in a manner that does not upset Israel.

How will we know the truth about that case? Simple; just bring all the
information out in the open. Take a look at the lives of Cipel and
McGreevey. Take a look at their friends and associates, the phone calls
they made, and the flow of money.

However, as usual, the Israeli citizen quietly returned to Israel, and
nobody in the USA investigated anything. Does that remind you of the five
dancing Israelis who were caught on September 11th, and then were sent
back to Israel?

Is Ingrid Rimland a female version
of Golan Cipel?

Since an Israeli man is willing to form a homosexual relationship with
a New Jersey governor in order to get into the US government, why not
consider the possibility that Ingrid Rimland would form a relationship
with a Holocaust investigator in order to set him up?

Are UFOs suppressed?

If so, does that make them
true?

Since this article talks about the suppression of information as a sign
of guilt, I don't want people to use it to justify UFOs.

People who promote the UFO stories tell us that the government is
suppressing information about aliens, and therefore the aliens really
exist.

However, I do not see any suppression of UFO information. Rather, I see
the exact opposite. I see public libraries, bookstores, television
programs, and movies full of UFO material.

The stories about the alien spacecraft in Roswell, New Mexico come from
a couple of people who said they saw something mysterious, or found
something mysterious. This is not evidence of an alien spacecraft.
What is especially suspicious is that some of these UFO witnesses work for
the military.

The government can fool people into promoting UFOs by creating the
impression that the government is suppressing information about UFOs. Many
people will jump to the conclusion that the UFOs must really exist.

How do we determine the truth in regards to UFOs and crop circles? By
exposing all of the information about
it. The truth about the UFOs does not need anybody to protect
it, not even the UFO supporters. Both the government and the UFO
supporters must show us all other information about UFOs.

However, the people who believe in UFOs have no
evidence. They only have a few blurry photos, and some of them
have a cousin who has a friend who met somebody on a trip who said he saw
a Martian.

People who believe in crop circles have nothing but photographs of crop
circles. These photographs prove that crop circles exist, but they do not
prove that they were created by an alien life form. Humans can and do
create crop circles, also.

You should find it peculiar that the people who promote UFOs, such as
Richard Hoagland and Art Bell, also promote the official story on 9/11 and
other crimes. Do you really think this is a coincidence?

Steven Greer, who has The
Disclosure Project, creates the impression that he is exposing the
truth about the UFOs, but I bet that if you look at him and his
associates, you will find that most of them are working for some
government agency or some group of criminals, and they are trying to make
us look like idiots.

How do we know if I am correct about Greer? Simple; just expose all the
information about him, his friends, his sources of income, and his
evidence of UFOs.

If you are interested in getting to the truth, demand that the
television networks put all of us on television, allow us to provide the
evidence we have, and let us discuss these issues.

Have you seen these brief articles about UFOs:

• www.iamthewitness.com/FlyingSaucers/FlyingSaucers.html

•  www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Aliens.htm