Back to The
French Connection

This is a series in
The
French Connection Educational Courses
to help you
earn your Masters in Deception

Lesson # 6
Deceiving
with the Truth

2 Feb
2006

The WTC Dust

The Department of Health and Mental Hygiene is tracking the health of
71,000 people exposed to the dust from the collapse of the World Trade
Center buildings.

Reports disagree on how many people have already died, but some reports
admit to three deaths as of January 2005:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/01/17/national/a111400S47.DTL&type=health

On 2 February 2006, a federal judge scolded the former chief of the Environmental
Protection Agency, Christine Todd Whitman, for not warning New York City
residents about the health dangers of the dust:
abcnews.go.com

It was demolition debris, not dust

Those clouds of dust were not ordinary "dust". Rather, the explosives
inside the World Trade Center towers and Building 7 pulverized the
buildings and their contents.

The people who breathed that "dust" were inhaling microscopic shards of
glass windows, computers, asbestos, mercury, fluorescent light bulbs,
coffee makers, carpeting, firemen, toilets, garbage, electrical wires, and
other dangerous items.

Omitting some truth to deceive

The reason most people don't realize how dangerous that dust was is
because most of the 9/11 "Truth Seekers" are trying to suppress evidence
that the towers were demolished with explosives.

A clever way to deceive people is to tell them the truth about an
issue, but don't tell them the complete truth. A simple example is a
person who says to you:

"Somebody just stole your car!"

That statement could be 100% correct, making it appear as if the person
is being honest. But by leaving out the statement "My friend stole your
car", he is deceiving you into thinking he is honest.

Deception with the WTC Dust

This type of deception is happening with the dust from the World Trade
Center towers. For example, a woman named Jenna Orkin was invited to speak
about the dust at a meeting that Jimmy Walter held in New York City on
September 11, 2004.

Jenna Orkin was honest when she explained to the audience that the
Environmental Protection Agency officials reassured the residents of New
York City that the air was safe to breathe. She also honestly explained
that the dust was actually quite dangerous.

By speaking honestly about the dust and the EPA officials, she gave
everybody the impression that she is an honest person who cares about the
residents of New York City.

However, she avoided the issue that the towers were pulverized with
explosives, and those explosives are the reason the dust was so dangerous.

Your first reaction might be to assume that she simply did not realize
that the towers were blown up. However, she was speaking at a meeting
where evidence was presented that the towers were indeed blown up, so what
are the chances that she did not know about this evidence?

She certainly knew about the evidence, so the only issue to wonder
about is: why was she ignoring it? Do you think she truly believed
that fire caused the towers and Building 7 to collapse?

Making a mistake in this type of situation can be dangerous. If you
trust her, and if she is part of the criminal network, that means you are
trusting criminals, and you are allowing them to run free.

Are you a good judge of people?

The inability to figure out who among us is lying and who can be
trusted is one of the major problems the world is facing. Take a look at
government leaders around the world. Most of the human population is
incapable of figuring out that most of these government leaders are liars,
criminals, pedophiles, incompetent nitwits, or emotionally disturbed
freaks.

Suppressing the truth is lying

There may be tens of thousands of people suffering health problems from
breathing that demolition debris. Some have already died, and others are
suffering painful, miserable lives.

However, instead of investigating the truly suspicious people, such as
Larry Silverstein, the media executives, Governor Pataki, Mayor Rudy
Giuliani, and hundreds of other people, many residents of the New York
City area may blame Christine Todd Whitman, who was working at the
Environmental Protection Agency at the time.

Furthermore, Jenna Orkin is directing anger towards the Environmental
Protection Agency. If Whitman had nothing to do with the 9-11 crime, that
would mean she is yet another victim of the September 11 attack.

Solving the 9-11 attack requires more than simply investigating the
truly suspicious people. It also requires avoiding the deception
from people like Jenna Orkin. We must not fall into the trap of assuming
that these "Truth Seekers" are on our side.