Check out our other hard-hitting interviews and news
items
at the main page for The
French
Connection

Why are
we
tolerating their deception?

Let's put suspicious
people on a list for the guillotine.

During an interview on November 14, 2005, Christopher Bollyn explained
that secret agencies around the world spend large amounts of tax money on
misinformation to deceive their own citizens and the citizens of other
nations.
The audio files of the interview are available
here
for at least a couple of weeks.

Nobody is immune to
deception

Everybody can be deceived, even the people who deceive us. None of us
have the time or resources to investigate the thousands of people who
claim to be providing the truth.

Everybody occasionally spreads false information. For example, many of
us repeated the official story about Oswald shooting President Kennedy.

We cannot blame a person who innocently spreads false information, but
we should stand up to the people who are knowingly providing this
disinformation.

For example, Gerald Posner wrote several books and articles that
support the government's version of the assassination of President Kennedy
and the attack on September 11. How could Posner possibly have researched
these crimes and come to the same conclusion as the government?

Let's be serious. Posner realizes that he is lying. Furthermore, he
must have had discussions with the criminals in our government.

After all, if you were hired to write a book about the attack on
the USS Liberty, how could you possibly come up with the government's
version of the attack unless you had meetings with the government and were
told what the official version is?

Most people ignore Gerald Posner and other liars, but these criminals
are raping America. They are distorting our history books. They are
allowing a criminal network to get control of the world.

When will people realize that standing up to criminals is
not dividing the "truth movement"?

Our lives and future are at stake. We must push these criminals out of
our lives.

Take a look at this
page that has a list of "patriots", and page
2 with more of them. Do you agree with that list?

Some of the people listed as patriots are:

Tom Flocco

Amy Goodman

Steven Greer

Seymour Hersh

Greg Palast

Gerald Posner

Mike Ruppert

Sherman Skolnick

What
makes any of those people "patriots"? What have any of them said or
done that has helped make America or the world a better place?

Those people are causing trouble by spreading partial truths, and in
some cases, total, blatant, outright lies. For example:

Many people consider Greg Palast be a honest because he criticizes
George Bush, but when has Palast ever told the truth about any of the
big crimes, such as 9/11, the USS liberty, or the Kennedy
assassination? Look at his
article on 9-11.

Gerald Posner lies about  9/11 and the Kennedy assassination.
How about his
book that blames 9/11 on the Clinton administration?

Steven Greer insists that the government is hiding Martians
from us.

We should stand up to Palast, Posner, and all the other liars.
These criminals should be put on a list for the
guillotine.

Other people create lists of disinfo sites.

Daryl Bradford Smith goes further and
presents
Suggestions
for the 9-11 Reign of Terror

This is only a partial list  to
serve as an example of what we need to do.

Criminals

Make them an appointment with the guillotine as
soon as possible

Probable criminals

These people and their associates should be considered part of the
criminal network until proven innocent

Suspicious people

Some of these people may be too afraid to be honest. They need further
investigation.

Karl W. B.
Schwarz

He lied to me in personal phone calls, and tried to use me for idiotic,
embarrasing schemes to boost his image.

He lies about his company and his financial status to create the
illusion that he is a super rich entrepreneur. Tries to promote himself as
a 9/11 investigator, and a presidential candidate.

Sherman
Skolnick

Diverts blame for 9-11 and other large crimes away from Zionists and
onto the Jesuits, mysterious people in Great Britain, and the Vatican. An
example is this
article.

Wayne
Madsen

He implies the Arabs were masterminds of 9-11, and the Israelis are
innocent.

He is described as "ex-NSA". Did he quit? Was he was fired? Or
is he secretly working for the NSA? Why does he associate with suspicious
people, such as Mike Ruppert and Thomas J Mattingly? Or is he helping some
group of Zionists?

George Soros

Pretends to be saving the world from George Bush. So why doesn't he
help us expose 9-11? Could it be because Bush is a puppet, and Soros wants
to protect his friends?

Stefan Grossmann

Promotes the
hologram theory, and does a lousy job of it, also. Does anybody read
his crap? No wonder he is a lawyer! What else could such a lousy mind do
for a living?

Tom Flocco

His lies are so obvious that if he is on our side, we don't need
enemies. If he works for Zionists, they should dock his pay for doing a
lousy job.

Jenna
Orkin

Blames the EPA for the health problems that thousands of people are
suffering from due to breathing the demolition dust of 9-11. Diverts
attention away from the fact that the buildings were demolished. Caused
disruption for Jimmy Walter's 9-11 European tour. A leader in the Peak Oil
movement, but how is she helping us deal with energy problems?

Fintan Dunne

One of the best disinfo pests. Writes nice articles that are very
convincing, and is subtle when he diverts attention away from Zionists and
onto the CIA. One of the few people who had the confidence in his skills
to attempt to make Eric Hufschmid look
like an disinfo agent. Hey Fintan, Do Daryl Smith next! Please?

Mike Ruppert

He has been trying to suppress accusations of explosives in the towers
starting
on 13 Sep 2001.

He diverts attention away from Zionists. Tries to frighten people with
"Peak Oil".

Gerald Posner

His support of the official version of the Kennedy assassination and
9/11 is so obviously a coverup that his books cannot be dismissed as an
innocent mistake. We don't need to waste time with a trial for him.

Steven
Greer

He is not discussing the possibility of life in the universe.
Rather, he is trying to deceive us into thinking the government is hiding
alien technology. His purpose may be to give conspiracy theories a bad
image.

Scott Ritter

Would you want this man near your children?

Info about him is here.

The above table is a Daryl Bradford Smith production.

No Zionist was mistreated during the creation of this table.

Read about the Axis of
Perverts to understand
disclaimer

How obvious
does
the
deception have to be?

The hologram theory, for example, is so stupid that even some of the
original promoters of the theory, such as the webfairy, have
abandoned it. Also, notice the behavior of the people who promote this
deception.

For example, on Nov 14, 2005 I and several other people received an
e-mail from Dave of 911Blimp.net. According to Blimpy Dave, a man named
Michael sent him an e-mail with several questions, such as:

> Dave,
> I just heard on Daryl Smith's radio program The
French Connection that you are a supporter of the hologram theory. Is
this accurate?

Blimpy Dave's response began:

Silly Michael! There is no "the hologram
theory" (of which I am aware).

Dave is trying to convince Michael that he does not believe in the
hologram theory, but farther down in his lengthy e-mail is a paragraph
that starts with:

Do you believe that it would have been
impossible for a holographically-cloaked smaller aircraft, perhaps
outfitted with "ventriloquistic" capabilities, to have fooled witnesses
(and cameras) on 9/11?

Doesn't that paragraph imply that Blimpy Dave believes in a
"hologram theory"? And a "ventriloquist theory"?

Not according to the end of that particular paragraph:

But that doesn't mean I have
hologram theory, either. (I don't. I just can't logically rule out the
possibility.

So, Blimpy Dave does not believe in a hologram theory;
rather, he is merely considering the hologram possibility.

Before you try to make sense of that, take a look at this remark
farther down in the e-mail:

And if you can prove that no holograms
were used on 9/11 before Daryl Bradford Smith can(not), I'll pay you the
$500 instead of paying it to Daryl Bradford Smith. That is my totally
honest way of saying "Put up or shut up"

Doesn't his $500 challenge imply that he believes in "the hologram
theory"?

Dave started the email message by insisting that he was unware of a
hologram theory. The day after I received that email I received an email
from Stefan Grossmann who defended the hologram theory. He also wrote:

I have published an account of the
hologram theory on my page
So here you go, Dave:

http://www.gallerize.com/What_Is_The_Hologram_Theory.htm

Now you can't say you don't know of the hologram theory. And by the
way, Dave... I will find a holographic guillotine for your head.

Fishing for Useful
Idiots

Dave promotes the hologram theory in a subtle manner. He wants
somebody else to post these theories on their site. He does not
want to promote holograms on his site because it would make him look like
an idiot. He wants somebody else to be the idiot.

The best way to spread a lie is to find a fool who actually believes
it. The Useful Idiot will then sound sincere as he spreads the lie to
other people. Dave is looking for those Useful Idiots.

Follow the rats to their
nest

When you discover a site that you are certain is a disinformation site,
you should be extra suspicious about the sites it promotes. For example,
Tom Flocco promotes Sherman Skolnick, Lenny Bloom, Tom Heneghan, and Stew
Webb. Each of those people promote a few other sites. All of these sites
are very suspicious. This is apparently one of the nests of criminals.

Another nest can be found by going to the site of William Thomas.

http://www.willthomas.net/911/index.htm

His web site implies that the American government ignored the warnings
that the Arabs were going to attack us, and that they US Air Force allow
the Arabs to hijack the airplanes.

He ignores the most important aspect of 9/11; namely, the demolition of
the World Trade Center towers and Building 7.

By putting the emphasis on the Arabs and the U.S. Air Force, he is
trying to fool us into thinking that 9/11 occurred because of a few US
government officials.

William Thomas has a lot of links, many of which are on this page:

http://www.willthomas.net/911/911_Commission_Hearing.htm

Where do those links lead you? Mainly to more sites that ignore the
demolition of the towers, and try to fool you into thinking that the
corrupt Bush administration officials allowed the evil Arabs to get away
with hijacking the airplanes.

For example, there is a link to Jared Israel's site:
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/airf.htm

This site has lots of articles that defend Israel and Zionism, such as
this:
http://emperors-clothes.com/israelguide.htm#7

William Thomas also has a link to a site by Mark R. Elsis.
http://www.911timeline.net/

This site has lots more links to sites that try to put the blame on the
Arabs. For example, it links to an article by Chaim Kupferberg about the
death of John O'Neill:
http://www.attackonamerica.net/themysterysurroundingthedeathofjohnoneill.htm

Kupferberg's article is a variation of the theory that John O'Neill was
killed by the Bush administration because he was about to uncover the
connection between the Bush family and the Arab terrorists.

It is difficult to read Kupferberg's articles, but if you can force
yourself to read it, you will find that the Israelis are not merely
innocent in 9-11; rather, they are victims! For example in one sentence he
writes:

"...various Israelis were unwittingly set up as patsies, to
be exposed should the need arise."

Keep a box of tissues handy when you read a Kupferberg article.

Mark Elsis also links to the 9-11 timeline by Paul Thompson, who also
ignores the demolition of the towers and makes the Arabs appear to be the
evil masterminds of 9-11.
http://cooperativeresearch.org/timeline

There may be hundreds of these nests of criminals on the Internet. If
we ever have a 9/11 reign of terror, we will be very
busy.