Sample! Sample! | 1 |
Have you ever weflected, wepowtew, that the evil what | 2 |
| though it was willed might nevewtheless lead somehow on to | 3 |
| good towawd the genewality? | 4 |
A pwopwo of haster meets waster and talking of plebiscites | 5 |
| by a show of hands, whether declaratory or effective, in all | 6 |
| seriousness, has it become to dawn in you yet that the deponent, | 7 |
| the man from Saint Yves, may have been (one is reluctant to use | 8 |
| the passive voiced) may be been as much sinned against as sin- | 9 |
| ning, for if we look at it verbally perhaps there is no true noun in | 10 |
active nature where every bally being please read this mufto | 11 |
is becoming in its owntown eyeballs. Now the long form and | 12 |
| the strong form and reform alltogether! | 13 |
Hotchkiss Culthur's Everready, one brother to never- | 14 |
| reached, well over countless hands, sieur of many winners and | 15 |
| losers, groomed by S. Samson and son, bred by dilalahs, will | 16 |
| stand at Bay (Dublin) from nun till dan and vites inversion and | 17 |
| at Miss or Mrs's MacMannigan's Yard. | 18 |
Perhaps you can explain, sagobean? The Mod needs a | 19 |
| rebus. | 20 |
Pro general continuation and in particular explication to | 21 |
| your singular interrogation our asseveralation. Ladiegent, pals | 22 |
| will smile but me and Frisky Shorty, my inmate friend, as is un- | 23 |
| common struck on poplar poetry, and a few fleabesides round at | 24 |
| West Pauper Bosquet, was glad to be back again with the chaps | 25 |
| and just arguing friendlylike at the Doddercan Easehouse having | 26 |
| a wee chatty with our hosty in his comfy estably over the old | 27 |
| middlesex party and his moral turps, meaning flu, pock, pox | 28 |
| and mizzles, grip, gripe, gleet and sprue, caries, rabies, numps | 29 |
| and dumps. What me and Frisky in our concensus and the whole | 30 |
| double gigscrew of suscribers, notto say the burman, having | 31 |
| successfully concluded our tour of bibel, wants to know is thisa- | 32 |
| here. Supposing, for an ethical fict, him, which the findings | 33 |
| showed, to have taken his epscene licence before the norsect's | 34 |
| divisional respectively as regards them male privates and or | 35 |
| concomitantly with all common or neuter respects to them | 36 |