An essay on the learning of Shakespeare: addressed to Joseph Cradock, Esq; The second edition, with large additions. By Richard Farmer, ...

Table of contents

- [halftitle]

- [titlepage]

- PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION.

AN ESSAY ON THE LEARNING OF SHAKESPEARE: ADDRESSED TO JOSEPH CRADOCK, Esq

"SHAKESPEARE, says a Brother of the Craft, [a] is a vast garden of criticism:" and certainly no one can be favoured with more weeders gratis.

But how often, my dear Sir, are weeds and flowers torn up indiscriminately?— the ravaged spot is re-planted in a moment, and a profusion of critical thorns thrown over it for security.

"A prudent man therefore would not venture his fingers amongst them."

Be however in little pain for your friend, who regards himself sufficiently to be cautious:—yet he asserts with confidence, that no improvement can be expected, whilst the natural soil is mistaken for a hot-bed, and the Natives of the banks of Avon are scientifically choked with the culture of exoticks.

Thus much for metaphor; it is contrary to the Statute to fly out so early: but who can tell, whether it may not be demonstrated by some critick or other, that a deviation from rule is peculiarly happy in an Essay of Shakespeare!

You have long known my opinion concerning the literary acquisitions of our immortal Dramatist; and remember how I congratulated myself on my coincidence with the last and best of his Editors. I told you however, that his small Latin and less Greek [b] would still be litigated, and you see very assuredly that I was not mistaken. The trumpet hath been sounded against "the darling project of representing Shakespeare as one of the illiterate vulgar;" and indeed to so good purpose, that I would by all means recommend the performer to the army of the braying Faction, recorded by Cervantes. The testimony of his contemporaries is again disputed; constant tradition is opposed by flimsy arguments; and nothing is heard, but confusion and nonsense. One could scarcely imagine this a topick very likely to inflame the passions: it is asserted by Dryden, that "those who accuse him to have wanted learning, give him the greatest commendation;" yet an attack upon an article of faith hath been usually received with more temper and complacence, than the unfortunate opinion, which I am about to defend.

But let us previously lament with every lover of Shakespeare, that the Question was not fully discussed by Mr. Johnson himself: what he sees intuitively, others must arrive at by a series of proofs; and I have not time to teach with precision: be contented therefore with a few cursory observations, as they may happen to arise from the Chaos of Papers, you have so often laughed at, "a stock sufficient to set up an Editor in form." I am convinced of the strength of my cause, and superior to any little advantage from sophistical arrangements.

General positions without proofs will probably have no great weight on either side, yet it may not seem fair to suppress them: take them therefore as their authors occur to me, and we will afterward proceed to particulars.

The testimony of Ben. stands foremost; and some have held it sufficient to decide the controversy: in the warmest Panegyrick, that ever was written, he apologizes[c] for what he supposed the only defect in his "beloved friend,—

——— Soul of the age!

Th' applause! delight! the wonder of our stage!—

whose memory he honoured almost to idolatry:" and conscious of the worth of ancient literature, like any other man on the same occasion, he rather carries his acquirements above, than below the truth. "Jealousy! cries Mr. Upton; People will allow others any qualities, but those upon which they highly value themselves." Yes, where there is a competition, and the competitor formidable: but, I think, this Critick himself hath scarcely set in opposition the learning of Shakespeare and Jonson. When a superiority is universally granted, it by no means appears a man's literary interest to depress the reputation of his Antagonist.

In truth the received opinion of the pride and malignity of Jonson, at least in the earlier part of life, is absolutely groundless: at this time scarce a play or a poem appeared without Ben's encomium, from the original Shakespeare to the translator of Du Bartas.

But Jonson is by no means our only authority. Drayton the countryman and acquaintance of Shakespeare, determines his excellence to the naturall Braine [d] only. Digges, a wit of the town before our Poet left the stage, is very strong to the purpose,

— "Nature only helpt him, for looke thorow

This whole book, thou shalt find he doth not borow

One phrase from Greekes, not Latines imitate,

Nor once from vulgar Languages translate."[e]

Suckling opposes his easier strain to the sweat of learned Jonson. Denham assures us, that all he had was from old Mother-wit. His native wood-notes wild, every one remembers to be celebrated by Milton. Dryden observes prettily enough, that "he wanted not the spectacles of books to read Nature." He came out of her hand, as some one else expresses it, like Pallas out of Jove's head, at full growth and mature.

The ever memorable Hales of Eton, (who, notwithstanding his Epithet, is, I fear, almost forgotten,) had too great a knowledge both of Shakespeare and the Ancients to allow much acquaintance between them: and urged very justly on the part of Genius in opposition to Pedantry, That "if he had not read the Classicks, he had likewise not stolen from them; and if any Topick was produced from a Poet of antiquity he would undertake to show somewhat on the same subject, at least as well written by Shakespeare."

Fuller, a diligent and equal searcher after truth and quibbles, declares positively, that "his learning was very little,—Nature was all the Art used upon him, as he himself, if alive, would confess." And may we not say, he did confess it, when he apologized for his untutored lines to his noble patron the Earl of Southampton? —this list of witnesses might be easily enlarged; but I flatter myself, I shall stand in no need of such evidence.

One of the first and most vehement assertors of the learning of Shakespeare, was the Editor of his Poems, the well-known Mr. Gildon;[f] and his steps were most punctually taken by a subsequent labourer in the same department, Dr. Sewel.

Mr. Pope supposed "little ground for the common opinion of his want of learning:" once indeed he made a proper distinction between learning and languages, as I would be understood to do in my Title-page; but unfortunately he forgot it in the course of his disquisition, and endeavoured to persuade himself that Shakespeare's acquaintance with the Ancients might be actually proved by the same medium as Jonson's.

Mr. Theobald is "very unwilling to allow him so poor a scholar, as many have laboured to represent him;" and yet is "cautious of declaring too positively on the other side the question."

Dr. Warburton hath exposed the weakness of some arguments from suspected imitations; and yet offers others, which, I doubt not, he could as easily have refuted.

Mr. Upton wonders "with what kind of reasoning any one could be so far imposed upon, as to imagine that Shakespeare had no learning;" and lashes with much zeal and satisfaction "the pride and pertness of dunces, who under such a name would gladly shelter their own idleness and ignorance."

He, like the learned Knight, at every anomaly in grammar or metre,

"Hath hard words ready to shew why,

And tell what Rule he did it by."

How would the old Bard have been astonished to have found, that he had very skilfully given the trochaic dimeter brachycatalectic, COMMONLY called the ithyphallic measure, to the Witches in Macheth! and that now and then a halting Verse afforded a most beautiful instance of the Pes proceleusmaticus!

"But, continues Mr. Upton, it was a learned age; Roger Ascham assures us, that Queen Elizabeth read more Greek every day, than some Dignitaries of the Church did Latin in a whole week." This appears very probable; and a pleasant proof it is of the general learning of the times, and of Shakespeare in particular. I wonder, he did not corroborate it with an extract from her injunctions to her Clergy, that "such as were but mean Readers should peruse over before, once or twice, the Chapters and Homilies, to the intent they might read to the better understanding of the people."

Dr. Grey declares, that Shakespeare's knowledge in the Greek and Latin tongues cannot reasonably be called in question. Dr. Dodd supposes it proved, that he was not such a novice in learning and antiquity as some people would pretend. And to close the whole, for I suspect you to be tired of quotation, Mr. Whalley, the ingenious Editor of Jonson, hath written a piece expressly on this side the question: perhaps from a very excusable partiality, he was willing to draw Shakespeare from the field of Nature to classick ground, where alone, he knew, his Author could possibly cope with him.

These criticks, and many others their coadjutors, have supposed themselves able to trace Shakespeare in the writings of the Ancients; and have sometimes persuaded us of their own learning, whatever became of their Author's. Plagiarisms have been discovered in every natural description and every moral sentiment. Indeed by the kind assistance of the various Excerpta, Sententiae, and Flores, this business may be effected with very little expense of time or sagacity; as Addison hath demonstrated in his Comment on Chevy-chace, and Wagstaff on Tom Thumb: and I myself will engage to give you quotations from the elder English writers (for to own the truth, I was once idle enough to collect such) which shall carry with them at least an equal degree of similarity. But there can be no occasion of wasting any future time in this department: the world is now in possession of the Marks of Imitation.

"Shakespeare however hath frequent allusions to the facts and fables of antiquity." Granted:—and as Mat. Prior says, to save the effusion of more Christian ink, I will endeavour to shew, how they came to his acquaintance.

It is notorious, that much of his matter of fact knowledge is deduced from Plutarch: but in what language he read him, hath yet been the question. Mr. Upton is pretty confident of his skill in the Original, and corrects accordingly the Errors of his Copyists by the Greek standard. Take a few instances, which will elucidate this matter sufficiently.

In the third act of Anthony and Cleopatra, Octavius represents to his Courtiers the imperial pomp of those illustrious lovers, and the arrangement of their dominion,

————"Unto her

He gave the 'stablishment of Egypt, made her

Of lower Syria, Cyprus, Lydia,

Absolute Queen."

Read Libya, says the critick authoritatively, as is plain from Plutarch, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉.

This is very true: Mr. Heath [g] accedes to the correction, and Mr. Johnson admits it into the Text: but turn to the translation, from the French of Amyot, by Thomas North, in Folio 1579;
[h]
and you will at once see the origin of the mistake.

"First of all he did establish Cleopatra Queene of Aegypt, of Cyprus, of Lydia, and the lower Syria."

Again in the Fourth Act,

——— "My messenger

He hath whipt with rods, dares me to personal combat,

Caesar to Anthony. Let th' old Ruffian know

I have many other ways to die; mean time

Laugh at his challenge."—

"What a reply is this, cries Mr. Upton? 'tis acknowledging he should fall under the unequal combat. But if we read,

——— "Let th' old Ruffian know

He hath many other ways to die; mean time

I laugh at his challenge."—

We have the poignancy and the very repartee of Caesar in Plutarch."

This correction was first made by Sir Thomas Hanmer, and Mr. Johnson hath received it. Most indisputably it is the sense of Plutarch, and given so in the modern translations: but Shakespeare was misled by the ambiguity of the old one, "Antonius sent again to challenge Caesar to fight him: Caesar answered, That he had many other ways to die, than so."

In the Third Act of Julius Caesar, Anthony in his well-known harangue to the people, repeats a part of the Emperor's will,

— "To every Roman citizen he gives,

To every sev'ral man, seventy five drachma's —

Moreover he hath left you all his walks,

His private arbours, and new-planted orchards,

On this side Tyber."—

"Our Author certainly wrote, says Mr. Theobald, On that side Tyber— ‘ Travs Tiberim—prope Caesaris hortos.’ And Plutarch, whom Shakespeare very diligently studied expressly declares, that he left the publick his gardens and walks, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, beyond the Tyber."

This emendation likewise hath been adopted by the subsequent Editors; but hear again the old Translation, where Shakespeare's study lay, "He bequeathed unto every citizen of Rome, seventy-five drachmas a man, and he left his gardens and arbours unto the people, which he had on this side of the river of Tyber." I could furnish you with many more instances, but these are as good as a thousand.

Hence had our author his characteristick knowledge of Brutus and Anthony, upon which much argumentation for his learning hath been founded: and hence literatim the Epitaph on Timon, which it was once presumed, he had corrected from the blunders of the Latin version, by his own superior knowledge of the Original.[i]

I cannot however omit a passage of Mr. Pope. "The speeches copy'd from Plutarch in Coriolanus may, I think, be as well made an instance of the learning of Shakespeare, as those copy'd from Cicero in Catiline, of Ben. Jonson's." Let us inquire into this matter, and transcribe a speech for a specimen. Take the famous one of Volumnia.

"Should we be silent and not speak, our raiment

And state of bodies would bewray what life

We've led since thy Exile. Think with thyself,

How more unfortunate than all living women

Are we come hither; since thy sight, which should

Make our eyes flow with joy, hearts dance with comforts,

Constrains them weep, and shake with fear and sorrow;

Making the mother, wife, and child to see

The son, the husband, and the father tearing

His Country's bowels out: and to poor we

Thy enmity's most capital; thou barr'st us

Our prayers to the Gods, which is a comfort

That all but we enjoy. For how can we,

Alas! how can we, for our Country pray,

Whereto we're bound, together with thy Victory,

Whereto we're bound? Alack! or we must of lose

The Country, our dear nurse; or else thy Person,

Our comfort in the Country. We must find

An eminent calamity, tho' we had

Our wish, which side shou'd win. For either thou

Must, as a foreign Recreant, be led

With manacles thorough our streets; or else

Triumphantly tread on thy Country's ruin,

And bear the palm, for having bravely shed

Thy wife and children's blood. For myself, son,

I purpose not to wait on Fortune, 'till

These wars determine: if I can't persuade thee

Rather to shew a noble grace to both parts,

Than seek the end of one; thou shalt no sooner

March to assault thy Country, than to tread

(Trust to't, thou shalt not) on thy mother's womb,

That brought thee to this world."

I will now give you the old Translation, which shall effectually confute Mr. Pope: for our Author hath done little more, than thrown the very words of North into blank verse.

"If we helde our peace (my sonne) and determined not to speake, the state of our poore bodies, and present sight of our rayment, would easely bewray to thee what life we haue led at home, since thy exile and abode abroad. But thinke now with thy selfe, howe much more unfortunately, then all the women liuinge we are come hether, considering that the sight which should be most pleasaunt to all other to beholde, spitefull fortune hath made most fearfull to us: making my selfe to see my sonne, and my daughter here, her husband, besieging the walles of his natiue countrie. So as that which is the only comfort to all other in their adversitie and miserie, to pray unto the goddes, and to call to them for aide; is the onely thinge which plongeth us into most deepe perplexitie. For we cannot (alas) together pray, both for victorie, for our countrie, and for safety of thy life also: but a worlde of grievous curses, yea more then any mortall enemie can heape uppon us, are forcibly wrapt up in our prayers. For the bitter soppe of most harde choyce is offered thy wife and children, to forgoe the one of the two: either to lose the persone of thy selfe, or the nurse of their natiue contrie. For my selfe (my sonne) I am determined not to tarrie, till fortune in my life time doe make an ende of this warre. For if I cannot persuade thee, rather to doe good unto both parties, then to ouerthrowe and destroye the one, preferring loue and nature before the malice and calamitie of warres: thou shalt see, my sonne, and trust unto it, thou shalt no soner marche forward to assault thy countrie, but thy foote shall tread upon thy mother's wombe, that brought thee first into this world."

The length of this quotation will be excused for it's curiosity; and it happily wants not the assistance of a Comment. But matters may not always be so easily managed:—a plagiarism from Anacreon hath been detected!

"The Sun's a thief, and with his great attraction

Robs the vast Sea. The Moon's an arrant thief,

And her pale fire she snatches from the Sun.

The Sea's a thief, whose liquid surge resolves

The Moon into salt tears. The Earth's a thief,

That feeds and breeds by a composture stol'n

From gen'ral excrements: each thing's a thief."

"This, says Dr. Dodd, is a good deal in the manner of the celebrated drinking Ode, too well known to be inserted." Yet it may be alleged by those, who imagine Shakespeare to have been generally able to think for himself, that the topicks are obvious, and their application is different.—But for argument's sake, let the Parody be granted; and "our Author, says some one, may be puzzled to prove, that there was a Latin translation of Anacreon at the time Shakespeare wrote his Timon of Athens." This challenge is peculiarly unhappy: for I do not at present recollect any other Classick, (if indeed, with great deference to Mynheer De Pauw, Anacreon may be numbered amongst them) that was originally published with two Latin [k] translations.

But this is not all. Puttenham in his Arte of English Poesie, 1589, quotes some one of a "reasonable good facilitie in translation, who finding certaine of Anacreon's Odes very well translated by Ronsard the French poet — comes our Minion, and translates the same out of French into English": and his strictures upon him evince the publication. Now this identical Ode is to be met with in Ronsard! and as his works are in few hands, I will take the liberty of transcribing it.

"La terre les eaux va boivant,

L' arbre la boit par sa racine,

La mer salee boit le vent,

Et le Soleil boit la marine.

Le Soleil est beu de la Lune,

Tout boit soit en haut ou en bas:

Suivant ceste reigle commune,

Pourquoy donc ne boirons-nous pas?"

Edit. Fol. p. 507.

I know not, whether an observation of two relative to our Author's acquaintance with Homer, be worth our investigation. The ingenious Mrs. Lenox observes on a passage of Troilus and Cressida, where Achilles is roused to battle by the death of Patroclus, that Shakespeare must here have had the Iliad in view, as "the old Story,[l] which in many places he hath faithfully copied, is absolutely silent with respect to this circumstance."

And Mr. Upton is positive that the sweet oblivious Antidote, inquired after by Macbeth, could be nothing but the Nepenthe described in the Odyssey, ‘"〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉."’ I will not insist upon the Translations by Chapman; as the first Editions are without date, and it may be difficult to ascertain the exact time of their publication. But the former circumstance might have been learned from Alexander Barclay;[m] and the latter more fully from Spenser, [n] than from Homer himself.

"But Shakespeare, persists Mr. Upton, hath some Greek Expressions." Indeed! —"We have one in Coriolanus,

——————"It is held

That valour is the chiefest Virtue, and

Most dignifies the Haver."—

and another in Macbeth, where Banquo addresses the Weïrd-Sisters,

——— "My noble Partner

You greet with present grace, and great prediction

Of noble Having."—

Gr. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉.—and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, to the Haver."

This was the common language of Shakespeare's time. "Lye in a water-bearer's house! says Master Mathew of Bobadil, a Gentleman of his Havings!"

Thus likewise John Davies in his Pleasant Descant upon English Proverbs, printed with his Scourge of Folly, about 1612;

"Do well and have well!—neyther so still:

For some are good Doers, whose Havings are ill."

and Daniel the Historian uses it frequently. Having seems to be synonymous with Behaviour in Gawin Douglas [o] and the elder Scotch writers.

Haver, in the sense of Possessor, is every where met with: tho' unfortunately the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 of Sophocles, produced as an authority for it, is suspected by Kuster, [p] as good a critick in these matters, to have absolutely a different meaning.

But what shall we say to the learning of the Clown in Hamlet, "Ay, tell me that, and unyoke?" alluding to the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 of the Greeks: and Homer and his Scholiast are quoted accordingly!

If it be not sufficient to say, with Dr. Warburton, that the phrase might be taken from Husbandry, without much depth of reading; we may produce it from a Dittie of the workmen of Dover, preserved in the additions to Holingshed, p. 1546.

"My bow is broke, I would unyoke,

My foot is sore, I can worke no more."

An expression of my Dame Quickly is next fastened upon, which you may look for in vain in the modern text; she calls some of the pretended Fairies in the Merry Wives of Windsor,
—"Orphan
[q]
Heirs of fixed Destiny."
and how elegant is this, quoth Mr. Upton, supposing the word to be used, as a Grecian would have used it? 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ab 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉—acting in darkness and obscurity."

Mr. Heath assures us, that the bare mention of such an interpretation, is a sufficient refutation of it: and his critical word will be rather taken in Greek than in English: in the same hands therefore I will venture to leave all our author's knowledge of the Old Comedy, and his etymological learning in the word, Desdemona. [r]

Surely poor Mr. Upton was very little acquainted with Fairies, notwithstanding his laborious study of Spenser. The last authentick account of them is from our countryman William Lilly;[s] and it by no means agrees with the learned interpretation: for the angelical Creatures appeared in his Hurst wood in a most illustrious Glory,—"and indeed, says the Sage, it is not given to very many persons to endure their glorious aspects."

The only use of transcribing these things, is to shew what absurdities men for ever run into, when they lay down an Hypothesis, and afterward seek for arguments in the support of it. What else could induce this man, by no means a bad scholar, to doubt whether Truepenny might not be derived from 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉; and quote upon us with much parade an old Scholiast on Aristophanes?—I will not stop to confute him: nor take any notice of two or three more Expressions, in which he was pleased to suppose some learned meaning or other; all which he might have found in every Writer of the time, or still more easily in the vulgar Translation of the Bible, by consulting the Concordance of Alexander Cruden.

But whence have we the Plot of Timon, except from the Greek of Lucian? — The Editors and Criticks have been never at a greater loss than in their inquiries of this sort; and the source of a Tale hath been often in vain sought abroad, which might easily have been found at home: My good friend, the very ingenious Editor of the Reliques of ancient English Poetry, hath shewn our Author to have been sometimes contented with a legendary Ballad.

The Story of the Misanthrope is told in almost every Collection of the time; and particulary in two books, with which Shakespeare was intimately acquainted; the Palace of Pleasure, and the English Plutarch. Indeed from a passage in an old Play, called Jack Drums Entertainement, I conjecture that he had before made his appearance on the Stage.

Were this a proper place for such a disquisition, I could give you many cases of this kind. We are sent for instance to Cinthio for the Plot of Measure for Measure, and Shakespeare's judgement hath been attacked for some deviations from him in the conduct of it: when probably all he knew of the matter was from Madam Isabella in the Heptameron of Whetstone. [t] Ariosto is continually quoted for the Fable of Much ado about Nothing; but I suspect our Poet to have been satisfied with the Geneura of Turberville. [u] As you like it was certainly borrowed, if we believe Dr. Grey, and Mr. Upton, from the Coke's Tale of Gamelyn; which by the way was not printed 'till a century afterward: when in truth the old Bard, who was no hunter of MSS. contented himself solely with Lodge's Rosalynd or Euphues' Golden Legacye. 4to. 1590. The Story of All's well that ends well, or, as I suppose it to have been sometimes called, Love's labour wonne, [x] is originally indeed the property of Boccace, [y] but it came immediately to Shakespeare from Painter's Giletta of Narbon. [z] Mr. Langbaine could not conceive, whence the Story of Pericles could be taken, "not meeting in History with any such Prince of Tyre;" yet his legend may be found at large in old Gower, under the name of Appolynus. [a]

Pericles is one of the Plays omitted in the later Editions, as well as the early Folio's, and not improperly; tho' it was published many years before the death of Shakespeare, with his name in the Title-page. Aulus Gellius informs us, that some Plays are ascribed absolutely to Plautus, which he only retouched and polished; and this is undoubtedly the case with our Author likewise. The revival of this performance, which Ben. Jonson calls stale and mouldy, was probably his earliest attempt in the Drama. I know, that another of these discarded pieces, the Yorkshire Tragedy, hath been frequently called so; but most certainly it was not written by our Poet at all: nor indeed was it printed in his life-time. The Fact on which it is built, was perpetrated no sooner than 1604:[b] much too late for so mean a performance from the hand of Shakespeare.

Sometimes a very little matter detects a forgery. You may remember a Play called the Double Falshood, which Mr. Theobald was desirous of palming upon the world for a posthumous one of Shakespeare: and I see it is classed as such in the last Edition of the Bodleian Catalogue. Mr. Pope himself, after all the strictures of Scriblerus, [c] in a Letter to Aaron Hill, supposes it of that age; but a mistaken accent determines it to have been written since the middle of the last century.

—— "This late example

Of base Henriquez, bleeding in me now,

From each good Aspect takes away my trust."

And in another place, ‘"You have an Aspect, Sir, of wondrous wisdom."’ The word Aspect, you perceive, is here accented on the first Syllable, which, I am confident, in any sense of it, was never the case in the time of Shakespeare; though it may sometimes appear to be so, when we do not observe a preceding Elision. [d]

Some of the professed Imitators of our old Poets have not attended to this and many other Minutiae: I could point out to you several performances in the respective Styles of Chaucer, Spenser, and Shakespeare, which the imitated Bard could not possibly have either read or construed.

This very accent hath troubled the Annotators on Milton. Dr. Bentley observes it to be "a tone different from the present use." Mr. Manwaring, in his Treatise of Harmony and Numbers, very solemnly informs us, that "this Verse is defective both in Accent and Quantity, B. 3. V. 266.

"His words here ended, but his meek Aspéct

Silent yet spake."—

Here, says he, a syllable is acuted and long, whereas it should be short and graved!"

And a still more extraordinary Gentleman, one Green, who published a Specimen of a new Version of the Paradise Lost, into BLANK verse, "by which that amazing Work is brought somewhat nearer the Summit of Perfection," begins with correcting a blunder in the fourth book, V. 540.

—— "The setting Sun

Slowly defended, and with right Aspéct —

Levell'd his evening rays."——

Not so in the New Version.

"Meanwhile the setting Sun descending slow—

Level'd with áspect right his ev'ning rays."

Enough of such Commentators.—The celebrated Dr. Dee had a Spirit, who would sometimes condescend to correct him, when peccant in Quantity: and it had been kind of him to have a little assisted the Wights abovementioned. —Milton affected the Antique; but it may seem more extraordinary, that the old Accent should be adopted in Hudibras.

After all, the Double Falshood is superior to Theobald. One passage, and one only in the whole Play, he pretended to have written:

——— "Strike up, my Masters;

"But touch the Strings with a religious softness:

"Teach sound to languish thro' the Night's dull Ear,

"'Till Melancholy start from her lazy Couch,

"And Carelessness grow Convert to Attention."

These lines were particularly admired; and his vanity could not resist the opportunity of claiming them: but his claim had been more easily allowed to any other part of the performance.

To whom then shall we ascribe it? — Somebody hath told us, who should seem to be a Nostrummonger by his argument, that, let Accents be how they will, it is called an original Play of William Shakespeare in the King's Patent, prefixed to Mr. Theobald's Edition, 1728, and consequently there could be no fraud in the matter. Whilff, on the contrary, the Irish Laureat, Mr. Victor, remarks, (and were it true, it would be certainly decisive) that the Plot is borrowed from a Novel of Cervantes, not published 'till the year after Shakespeare's death. But unluckily the same Novel appears in a part of Don Quixote, which was printed in Spanish, 1605, and in English by Shelton, 1612. — The same reasoning however, which exculpated our Author from the Yorkshire Tragedy, may be applied on the present occasion.

But you want my opinion: —and from every mark of Style and Manner, I make no doubt of ascribing it to Shirley. Mr. Langbaine informs us, that he left some Plays in MS. — These were written about the time of the Restoration, when the Accent in question was more generally altered.

Perhaps the mistake arose from an abbreviation of the name. Mr. Dodsley knew not that the Tragedy of Andromana was Shirley's, from the very same cause. Thus a whole stream of Biographers tell us, that Marston's Plays were printed at London, 1633, "by the care of William Shakespeare, the famous Comedian."—Here again I suppose, in some Transcript, the real Publisher's name, William Sheares, was abbreviated. No one hath protracted the life of Shakespeare beyond 1616, except Mr. Hume; who is pleased to add a year to it, in contradiction to all manner of evidence.

Shirley is spoken of with contempt in Mac Flecknoe; but his Imagination is sometimes fine to an extraordinary degree. I recollect a passage in the fourth book of the Paradise Lost, which hath been suspected of Imitation, as a prettiness below the Genius of Milton: I mean, where Uriel glides backward and forward to Heaven on a Sun-beam. Dr. Newton informs us, that this might possibly be hinted by a Picture of Annibal Carracci in the King of France's Cabinet: but I am apt to believe that Milton had been struck with a Portrait in Shirley. Fernando, in the Comedy of the Brothers, 1652, describes Jacinta at Vespers:

"Her eye did seem to labour with a tear,

Which suddenly took birth, but overweigh'd

With it's own swelling, drop'd upon her bosome;

Which by reflexion of her light, appear'd

As nature meant her sorrow for an ornament:

After, her looks grew chearfull, and I saw

A smile shoot gracefull upward from her eyes,

As if they had gain'd a victory o'er grief,

And with it many beams twisted themselves,

Upon whose golden threads the Angels walk

To and again from Heaven."[e]—

You must not think me infected with the spirit of Lauder, if I give you another of Milton's Imitations:

—— "The Swan with arched neck

"Between her white wings mantling proudly, rows

"Her state with oary feet."—

B. 7. V. 438, &c.

"The ancient Poets, says Mr. Richardson, have not hit upon this beauty; so lavish as they have been in their descriptions of the Swan. Homer calls the Swan long-necked, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉; but how much more pittoresque, if he had arched this length of neck?"

For this beauty however, Milton was beholden to Donne; whose name, I believe, at present is better known than his writings:

—— "Like a Ship in her full trim,

A Swan, so white that you may unto him

Compare all whitenesse, but himselfe to none,

Glided along, and as he glided watch'd,

And with his arched neck this poore fish catch'd."—

Progresse of the Soul. St. 24.

Those highly finished Landscapes, the Seasons, are indeed copied from Nature: but Thomson sometimes recollected the hand of his Master:

——— "The stately sailing Swan

Gives out his snowy plumage to the gale;

And arching proud his Neck, with oary feet,

Bears forward fierce, and guards his osier Isle,

Protective of his young." —

But to return, as we say on other occasions. — Perhaps the Advocates for Shakespeare's knowledge of the Latin language may be more successful. Mr. Gildon takes the Van. "It is plain, that He was acquainted with the Fables of antiquity very well: that some of the Arrows of Cupid are pointed with Lead, and others with Gold, he found in Ovid; and what he speaks of Dido, in Virgil: nor do I know any translation of these Poets so ancient as Shakespeare's time." The passages on which these sagacious remarks are made, occur in the Midsummer Night's Dream; and exhibit, we see, a clear proof of acquaintance with the Latin Classicks. But we are not answerable for Mr. Gildon's ignorance; he might have been told of Caxton and Douglas, of Surrey and Stanyhurst, of Phaer and Twyne, of Fleming and Golding, of Turberville and Churchyard! but these Fables were easily known without the help of either the originals or the translations. The Fate of Dido had been sung very early by Gower, Chaucer, and Lydgate; Marloe had even already introduced her to the Stage: and Cupid's arrows appear with their characteristick differences in Surrey, in Sidney, in Spenser, and every Sonetteer of the time. Nay, their very names were exhibited long before in the Romaunt of the Rose: a work, you may venture to look into, notwithstanding Master Prynne hath so positively assured us, on the word of John Gerson, that the Author is most certainly damned, if he did not care for a serious repentance.[f]

Mr. Whalley argues in the same manner, and with the same success. He thinks a passage in the Tempest,

——— "High Queen of State,

Great Juno comes; I know her by her Gait."

a remarkable instance of Shakespeare's knowledge of ancient Poetick story; and that the hint was furnished by the Divûm incedo Regina of Virgil. [g]

You know, honest John Taylor, the Water-poet, declares that he never learned his Accidence, and that Latin and French were to him Heathen-Greek; yet by the help of Mr. Whalley's argument, I will prove him a learned Man, in spite of every thing, he may say to the contrary: for thus he makes a Gallant address his Lady,

"Most inestimable Magazine of Beauty — in whom the Port and Majesty of Juno, the Wisdom of Jove's braine-bred Girle, and the Feature of Cytherea, [h] have their domestical habitation."

In the Merchant of Venice, we have an oath "By two-headed Janus;" and here, says Dr. Warburton, Shakespeare shews his knowledge in the Antique: and so again does the Water-poet, who describes Fortune, ‘"Like a Janus with a double-face." ’

But Shakespeare hath somewhere at Latin Motto, quoth Dr. Sewel; and so hath John Taylor, and a whole Poem upon it into the bargain.

You perceive, my dear Sir, how vague and indeterminate such arguments must be: for in fact this sweet Swan of Thames, as Mr. Pope calls him, hath more scraps of Latin, and allusions to antiquity than are any where to be met with in the writings of Shakespeare. I am sorry to trouble you with trifles, yet what must be done, when grave men insist upon them?

It should seem to be the opinion of some modern criticks, that the personages of classick land began only to be known in England in the time of Shakespeare; or rather, that he particularly had the honour of introducing them to the notice of his countrymen.

For instance, — Rumour painted full of tongues, gives us a Prologue to one of the parts of Henry the Fourth; and, says Dr. Dodd, Shakespeare had doubtless a view to either Virgil or Ovid in their description of Fame.

But why so? Stephen Hawes in his Pastime of Pleasure had long before exhibited her in the same manner,

"A goodly Lady envyroned about

With tongues of fyre."[i]—

and so had Sir Thomas More in one of his Pageants, [k]

"Fame I am called, mervayle you nothing

Though with tonges I am compassed all rounde."

not to mention her elaborate Portrait by Chaucer, in the Boke of Fame; and by John Higgins, one of the Assistants in the Mirour for Magistrates, in his Legend of King Albanacte.

A very liberal Writer on the Beauties of Poetry, who hath been more conversant in the ancient Literature of other Countries, than his own, "cannot but wonder, that a Poet, whose classical Images are composed of the finest parts, and breath the very spirit of ancient Mythology, should pass for being illiterate:"

"See what a grace was seated on his brow!

Hyperion's curls: the front of Jove himself:

An eye like Mars to threaten and command:

A station like the herald Mercury,

New lighted on a heaven-kissing hill."

Hamlet.
Illiterate is an ambiguous term: the question is, whether Poetick History could be only known by an Adept in Languages. It is no reflection on this ingenious Gentleman, when I say, that I use on this occasion the words of a better Critick, who yet was not willing to carry the illiteracy of our Poet too far:— "They who are in such astonishment at the learning of Shakespeare, forget that the Pagan Imagery was familiar to all the Poets of his time; and that abundance of this sort of learning was to be picked up from almost every English book, that he could take into his hands." For not to insist upon Stephen Bateman's Golden booke of the leaden Goddes, 1577, and several other laborious compilations on the subject, all this and much more Mythology might as perfectly have been learned from the Testament of Creseide, [l] and the Fairy Queen, [m] as from a regular Pantheon or Polymetis himself.

Mr. Upton, not contented with Heathen learning, when he finds it in the text, must necessarily super-add it, when it appears to be wanting; because Shakespeare most certainly hath lost it by accident!

In Much ado about Nothing, Don Pedro says of the insensible Benedict, "He hath twice or thrice cut Cupid's bow-string, and the little Hangman dare not shoot at him."

This mythology is not recollected in the Ancients, and therefore the critick hath no doubt but his Author wrote "Henchman,—a Page, Pusio: and this word seeming too hard for the Printer, he translated the little Urchin into a Hangman, a character no way belonging to him."

But this character was not borrowed from the Ancients; — it came from the Arcadia of Sir Philip Sidney:

"Millions of yeares this old drivell Cupid lives;

While still more wretch, more wicked he doth prove:

Till now at length that Jove him office gives,

(At Juno's suite who much did Argus love)

In this our world a Hangman for to be

Of all those fooles that will have all they see."

B. 2. Ch. 14.

I know it may be objected on the authority of such Biographers, as Theophilus Cibber, and the Writer of the Life of Sir Philip, prefixed to the modern Editions; that the Arcadia was not published before 1613, and consequently too late for this imitation: but I have a Copy in my own possession, printed for W. Ponsonbie, 1590, 4to. which hath escaped the notice of the industrious Ames, and the rest of our typographical Antiquaries.

Thus likewise every word of antiquity is to be cut down to the classical standard.

In a Note on the Prologue to Troilus and Cressida, (which, by the way, is not met with in the Quarto) Mr. Theobald informs us, that the very names of the gates of Troy, have been barbarously demolished by the Editors: and a deal of learned dust he makes in setting them right again; much however to Mr. Heath's satisfaction. Indeed the learning is modestly withdrawn from the later Editions, and we are quietly instructed to read,

"Dardan, and Thymbria, Ilia, Scaea, Troian,

And Antenorides."

But had he looked into the Troye boke of Lydgate, instead of puzzling himself with Dares Phrygius, he would have found the horrid demolition to have been neither the work of Shakespeare nor his Editors.

"Therto his cyte | compassed enuyrowne

Hadde gates VI to entre into the towne:

The firste of all | and strengest eke with all,

Largest also | and moste pryncypall,

Of myghty byldyng | alone pereless,

Was by the kynge called | Dardanydes;

And in storye | lyke as it is founde,

Tymbria | was named the seconde;

And the thyrde | called Helyas,

The fourthe gate | hyghte also Cetheas;

The fyfthe Trojana, | the syxth Anthonydes,

Stronge and myghty | both in werre and pes."[n]

Lond. empr. by R. Pynson. 1513. Fol. B. 2. Ch. 11.

Our excellent friend Mr. Hurd hath born a noble testimony on our side of the question. "Shakespeare, says this true Critick, owed the felicity of freedom from the bondage of classical superstition, to the want of what is called the advantage of a learned Education.—This, as well as a vast superiority of Genius hath contributed to lift this astonishing man to the glory of being esteemed the most original thinker and speaker, since the times of Homer." And hence indisputably the amazing Variety of Style and Manner, unknown to all other Writers: an argument of itself sufficient to emancipate Shakespeare from the supposition of a Classical training. Yet, to be honest, one Imitation is fastened on our Poet: which hath been insisted upon likewise by Mr. Upton and Mr. Whalley. You remember it in the famous Speech of Claudio in Measure for Measure: ‘"Ay, but to die and go we know not where! &c."’

Most certainly the Ideas of a "Spirit bathing in fiery floods," of residing "in thrilling regions of thick-ribbed ice," or of being "imprisoned in the viewless winds," are not original in our Author; but I am not sure, that they came from the Platonick Hell of Virgil. [o] The Monks also had their hot and their cold Hell, "the fyrste is fyre that ever brenneth, and never gyveth lighte, says an old Homily: [p]— The seconde is passyng colde, that yf a grete hylle of fyre were casten therin, it sholde torne to yce." One of their Legends, well remembered in the time of Shakespeare, gives us a Dialogue between a Bishop and a Soul tormented in a piece of ice, which was brought to cure a grete brenning heate in his foot: [q] take care you do not interpret this the Gout, for I remember M. Menage quotes a Canon upon us, ‘"Si quis dixerit Episcopum PODAGRA laborare, Anathema sit."’

Another tells us of the Soul of a Monk fastened to a Rock, which the winds were to blow about for a twelvemonth, and purge of it's Enormities. Indeed this doctrine was before now introduced into poetick fiction, as you may see in a Poem "where the Lover declareth his pains to exceed far the pains of Hell," among the many miscellaneous ones subjoined to the Works of Surrey. Nay, a very learned and inquisitive Brother-Antiquary, our Greek Professor, hath observed to me on the authority of Blefkenius, that this was the ancient opinion of the inhabitants of Iceland;[r] who were certainly very little read either in the Poet or the Philosopher.

After all, Shakespeare's curiosity might lead him to Translations. Gawin Douglas really changes the Platonick Hell into the "punytion of Saulis in Purgatory:" and it is observable, that when the Ghost informs Hamlet of his Doom there,

"Till the foul crimes done in his days of nature

Are burnt and purg'd away,"—

the Expression is very similar to the Bishop's: I will give you his Version as concisely as I can; "It is a nedeful thyng to suffer panis and torment— Sum in the wyndis, Sum under the watter, and in the fire uthir Sum: — thus the mony Vices—

"Contrakkit in the corpis be done away

And purgit" —

Sixte Booke of Eneados. Fol. p. 191.

It seems however, that "Shakespeare himself in the Tempest hath translated some expressions of Virgil: witness the O Dea certe." I presume, we are here directed to the passage, where Ferdinand says of Miranda, after hearing the Songs of Ariel,

—— "Most sure, the Goddess

On whom these airs attend."

and so very small Latin is sufficient for this formidable translation, that if it be thought any honour to our Poet, I am loth to deprive him of it; but his honour is not built on such a sandy foundation. Let us turn to a real Translator, and examine whether the Idea might not be fully comprehended by an English reader; supposing it necessarily borrowed from Virgil. Hexameters in our own language are almost forgotten; we will quote therefore this time from Stanyhurst:

"O to thee, fayre Virgin, what terme may rightly be fitted?

Thy tongue, thy visage no mortal frayltie resembleth.

—No doubt, a Godesse!"

Edit. 1583.

Gabriel Harvey desired only to be "Epitaph'd, the Inventor of the English Hexameter," and for a while every one would be halting on Roman feet; but the ridicule of our Fellow- Collegian Hall, in one of his Satires, and the reasoning of Daniel, in his Defence of Rhyme against Campion, presently reduced us to our original Gothic.

But to come nearer the purpose, what will you say, if I can shew you, that Shakespeare, when, in the favourite phrase, he had a Latin Poet in his Eye, most assuredly made use of a Translation.

Prospero in the Tempest begins the Address to his attendant Spirits, ‘"Ye Elves of Hills, of standing Lakes, and Groves."’

This speech, Dr. Warburton rightly observes to be borrowed from Medea in Ovid: and "it proves, says Mr. Holt, [s] beyond contradiction, that Shakespeare was perfectly acquainted with the Sentiments of the Ancients on the Subject of Inchantments." The original lines are these.

"Auraeque, & venti, montesque, amnesque, lacusque,

Diique omnes nemorum, diique omnes noctis adeste."

It happens however, that the translation by Arthur Golding [t] is by no means literal, and Shakespeare hath closely followed it;

"Ye Ayres and Winds; Ye Elves of Hills, of Brookes, of Woods alone,

Of standing Lakes, and of the Night approche ye everych one."

I think it is unnecessary to pursue this any further; especially as more powerful arguments await us.

In the Merchant of Venice, the Jew, as an apology for his cruelty to Anthonio, rehearses many Sympathies and Antipathies for which no reason can be rendered,

"Some love not a gaping Pig —

And others when a Bagpipe sings i'th' nose

Cannot contain their urine for affection."

This incident, Dr. Warburton supposes to be taken from a passage in Scaliger's Exercitations against Cardan, "Narrabo tibi jocosam Sympathiam Reguli, Vasconis Equitis: Is dum viveret audito Phormingis sono, urinam illico facere cogebatur." And, proceeds the Doctor, to make this jocular story still more ridiculous, Shakespeare, I suppose, translated Phorminx by Bagpipes.

Here we seem fairly caught; — for Scaliger's work was never, as the term goes, done into English. But luckily in an old translation from the French of Peter Le Loier, entitled, A treatise of Specters, or straunge Sights, Visions and Apparitions appearing sensibly unto men, we have this identical Story from Scaliger: and what is still more, a marginal Note gives us in all probability the very fact alluded to, as well as the word of Shakespeare, "Another Gentleman of this quality liued of late in Deuon neere Excester, who could not endure the playing on a Bagpipe." [u]

We may just add, as some observation hath been made upon it, that Affection in the sense of Sympathy was formerly technical; and so used by Lord Bacon, Sir Kenelm Digby, and many other Writers.

A single word in Queen Catherine's Character of Wolsey, in Henry the 8th, is brought by the Doctor as another argument for the learning of Shakespeare.

——— "He was a man

Of an unbounded Stomach, ever ranking

Himself with Princes; one that by Suggestion

Ty'd all the kingdom. Simony was fair play.

His own opinion was his law, i'th' presence

He would say untruths, and be ever double

Both in his words and meaning. He was never

But where he meant to ruin, pitiful.

His promises were, as he then was, mighty;

But his performance, as he now is, nothing.

Of his own body he was ill, and gave

The Clergy ill example."

The word Suggestion, says the Critick, is here used with great propriety, and seeming knowledge of the Latin tongue: and he proceeds to settle the sense of it from the late Roman writers and their glossers. But Shakespeare's knowledge was from Holingshed, whom he follows verbatim:

"This Cardinal was of a great stomach, for he compted himself equal with princes, and by craftie Suggestion got into his hands innumerable treasure: he forced little on simonie, and was not pitifull, and stood affectionate in his own opinion: in open presence he would lie and seie untruth, and was double both in speech and meaning: he would promise much and performe little: he was vicious of his bodie, and gaue the clergie euil example." Edit. 1587. p. 922.

Perhaps after this quotation, you may not think, that Sir Thomas Hanmer, who reads Tyth'd — instead of Ty'd all the kingdom, deserves quite so much of Dr. Warburton's severity. — Indisputably the passage, like every other in the Speech, is intended to express the meaning of the parallel one in the Chronicle: it cannot therefore be credited, that any man, when the Original was produced, should still chuse to defend a cant acceptation; and inform us, perhaps, seriously, that in gaming language, from I know not what practice, to tye is to equal! A sense of the word, as far as I have yet found, unknown to our old Writers; and, if known, would not surely have been used in this place by our Author.

But let us turn from conjecture to Shakespeare's authorities. Hall, from whom the above description is copied by Holingshed, is very explicit in the demands of the Cardinal: who having insolently told the Lord Mayor and Aldermen, "For sothe I thinke, that halfe your substaunce were to litle," assures them by way of comfort at the end of his harangue, that upon an average the tythe should be sufficient; "Sers, speake not to breake that thyng that is concluded, for some shal not paie the tenth parte, and some more." — And again; "Thei saied, the Cardinall by Visitacions, makyng of Abbottes, probates of testamentes, graunting of faculties, licences, and other pollyngs in his Courtes legantines, had made his threasore egall with the kynges." Edit. 1548. p. 138. and 143.

Skelton, [x] in his Why come ye not to Court, gives us, after his rambling manner, a curious character of Wolsey:

— "By and by

He will drynke us so dry

And sucke us so nye

That men shall scantly

Haue penny or halpennye

God saue hys noble grace

And graunt him a place

Endlesse to dwel

With the deuill of hel

For and he were there

We nead neuer feare

Of the feendes blacke

For I undertake

He wold so brag and crake

That he wold than make

The deuils to quake

To shudder and to shake

Lyke a fier drake

And with a cole rake

Bruse them on a brake

And binde them to a stake

And set hel on fyre

At his owne desire

He is such a grym syre!"

Edit. 1568.

Mr. Upton and some other Criticks have thought it very scholar-like in Hamlet to swear the Centinels on a Sword: but this is for ever met with. For instance, in the Passus primus of Pierce Plowman,

"Dauid in his daies dubbed knightes,

And did hem swere on her sword to serue truth euer."

And in Hieronymo, the common Butt of our Author, and the Wits of the time, says Lorenzo to Pedringano,

"Swear on this cross, that what thou sayst is true—

But if I prove thee perjured and unjust,

This very sword, whereon thou took'st thine oath

Shall be the worker of thy Tragedy!"

We have therefore no occasion to go with Mr. Garrick as far as the French of Brantôme to illustrate this ceremony:[y] a Gentleman, who will be always allowed the first Commentator on Shakespeare, when he does not carry us beyond himself.

Mr. Upton however, in the next place, produces a passage from Henry the sixth, whence he argues it to be very plain, that our Author had not only read Cicero's Offices, but even more critically than many of the Editors:

— "This Villain here

Being Captain of a Pinnace, threatens more

Than Bargulus, the strong Illyrian Pirate."

So the Wight, he observes with great exultation, is named by Cicero in the Editions of Shakespeare's time, "Bargulus, Illyrius latro;" tho' the modern Editors have chosen to call him Bardylis: — "and thus I found it in two MSS." — And thus he might have found it in two Translations, before Shakespeare was born. Robert Whytinton, 1533, calls him, "Bargulus, a Pirate upon the see of Illiry;" and Nicholas Grimald, about twenty years afterward, "Bargulus, the Illyrian Robber."[z]

But it had been easy to have checked Mr. Upton's exultation, by observing, that Bargulus does not appear in the Quarto.— Which also is the case with some fragments of Latin verses, in the different Parts of this doubtful performance.

It is scarcely worth mentioning, that two or three more Latin passages, which are met with in our Author, are immediately transcribed from the Story or Chronicle before him. Thus in Henry the fifth, whose right to the kingdom of France is copiously demonstrated by the Archbishop.

——— "There is no bar

To make against your Highness' claim to France,

But this which they produce from Pharamond:

In terram Salicam mulieres nè succedant;

No Woman shall succeed in Salike land:

Which Salike land the French unjustly gloze

To be the realm of France, and Pharamond

The founder of this law and female bar.

Yet their own authors faithfully affirm,

That the land Salike lies in Germany,

Between the floods of Sala and of Elve, &c."

Archbishop Chichelie, says Holingshed, "did much inueie against the surmised and false fained law Salike, which the Frenchmen alledge euer against the kings of England in barre of their just title to the crowne of France. The very words of that supposed law are these, In terram Salicam mulieres nè succedant, that is to saie, Into the Salike land let not women succeed; which the French glossers expound to be the realm of France, and that this law was made by King Pharamond: whereas yet their owne authors affirme, that the land Salike is in Germanie, between the rivers of Elbe and Sala, &c." p. 545.

It hath lately been repeated from Mr. Guthrie's "Essay upon English Tragedy," that the Portrait of Macbeth's Wife is copied from Buchanan, "whose spirit, as well as words, is translated into the Play of Shakespeare: and it had signified nothing to have pored only on Holingshed for Facts." — "Animus etiam, per se ferox, prope quotidianis conviciis uxoris (quae omnium consiliorum ei erat conscia) stimulabatur."— This is the whole, that Buchanan says of the Lady, and truly I see no more spirit in the Scotch, than in the English Chronicler. "The wordes of the three weird Sisters also greatly encouraged him [to the Murder of Duncan], but specially his wife lay sore upon him to attempt the thing, as she that was very ambitious, brenning in unquenchable desire to beare the name of a Queene." Edit. 1577. p. 244.

This part of Holingshed is an Abridgment of Johne Bellenden's translation of the noble clerk, Hector Boece, imprinted at Edingburgh, in Fol. 1541. I will give the passage as it is found there. "His wyfe impacient of lang tary (as all wemen ar) specially quhare they ar desirus of ony purpos, gaif hym gret artation to pursew the thrid weird, that sche micht be ane quene, calland hym oft tymis febyl cowart and nocht desyrus of honouris, sen he durst not assailze the thing with manheid and curage, quhilk is offerit to hym be beniuolence of fortoun. Howbeit sindry otheris hes assailzeit sic thinges afore with maist terribyl jeopardyis, quhen thay had not sic sickernes to succeid in the end of thair laubouris as he had." p. 173.

But we can demonstrate, that Shakespeare had not the Story from Buchanan. According to him, the Weïrd-Sisters salute Macbeth, "Una Angusiae Thanum, altera Moraviae, tertia Regem."—Thane of Angus, and of Murray, &c. but according to Holingshed, immediately from Bellenden, as it stands in Shakespeare, "The first of them spake and sayde, All hayle Makbeth Thane of Glammis, — the second of them said, Hayle Makbeth Thane of Cawder; but the third sayde, All hayle Makbeth, that hereafter shall be king of Scotland." p. 243.

"1 Witch. All hail, Macbeth! Hail to thee, Thane of Glamis!

2 Witch. All hail, Macbeth! Hail to thee, Thane of Cawdor!

3 Witch. All hail, Macbeth! that shalt be King hereafter!"

Here too our Poet found the equivocal Predictions, on which his Hero so fatally depended. "He had learned of certain wysards, how that he ought to take heede of Macduffe;—and surely hereupon had he put Macduffe to death, but a certaine witch whom he had in great trust, had tolde, that he should neuer be slain with man borne of any woman, nor vanquished till the Wood of Bernane came to the Castell of Dunsinane." p. 244. And the Scene between Malcolm and Macduff in the fourth act is almost literally taken from the Chronicle.

Macheth was certainly one of Shakespeare's latest Productions, and it might possibly have been suggested to him by a little performance on the same subject at Oxford, before King James, 1605. I will transcribe my notice of it from Wake's Rex Platonicus: "Fabulae ansam dedit antiqua de Regiâ prosapiâ historiola apud Scoto-Britannos celebrata, quae narrat tres olim Sibyllas occurrisse duobus Scotiae proceribus, Macbetho & Banchoni, & illum praedixisse Regem futurum, sed Regem nullum geniturum; hunc Regem non futurum, sed Reges geniturum multos. Vaticinii veritatem rerum eventus comprobavit. Banchonis enim è stirpe Potentissimus Jacobus oriundus." p. 29.

A stronger argument hath been brought from the Plot of Hamlet. Dr. Grey and Mr. Whalley assure us, that for this, Shakespeare must have read Saxo Grammaticus in Latin, for no translation hath been made into any modern Language. But the truth is, he did not take it from Saxo at all; a Novel called the Hystorie of Hamblet was his original: a fragment of which, in black Letter, I have been favoured with by a very curious and intelligent Gentleman, to whom the lovers of Shakespeare will some time or other owe great obligations.

It hath indeed been said, that "IF such an history exists, it is almost impossible that any poet unacquainted with the Latin language (supposing his perceptive faculties to have been ever so acute) could have caught the characteristical madness of Hamlet, described by Saxo Grammaticus, [a] so happily as it is delineated by Shakespeare."

Very luckily, our Fragment gives us a part of Hamlet's Speech to his Mother, which sufficiently replies to this observation. —"It was not without cause, and juste occasion, that my gestures, countenances and words seeme to proceed from a madman, and that I desire to haue all men esteeme mee wholy depriued of sence and reasonable understanding, bycause I am well assured, that he that hath made no conscience to kill his owne brother, (accustomed to murthers, and allured with desire of gouernement without controll in his treasons) will not spare to saue himselfe with the like crueltie, in the blood, and flesh of the loyns of his brother, by him massacred: and therefore it is better for me to fayne madnesse then to use my right sences as nature hath bestowed them upon me, The bright shining clearnes therof I am forced to hide vnder this shadow of dissimulation, as the sun doth hir beams vnder some great cloud, when the wether in summer time ouercasteth: the face of a mad man, serueth to couer my gallant countenance, and the gestures of a fool are fit for me, to the end that guiding my self wisely therin I may preserue my life for the Danes and the memory of my late deceased father, for that the desire of reuenging his death is so ingrauen in my heart, that if I dye not shortly, I hope to take such and so great vengeance, that these Countryes shall for euer speake thereof. Neuerthelesse I must stay the time, meanes, and occasion, lest by making ouer great hast, I be now the cause of of mine owne sodaine ruine and ouerthrow, and by that meanes, end, before I beginne to effect my hearts desire: hee that hath to doe with a wicked, disloyall, cruell, and discourteous man, must vse craft, and politike inuentions, such as a fine witte can best imagine, not to discouer his interprise: for seeing that by force I cannot effect my desire, reason alloweth me by dissimulation, subtiltie, and secret practises to proceed therein."

But to put the matter out of all question, my communicative Friend above-mentioned, Mr. Capell, (for why should I not give myself the credit of his name?) hath been fortunate enough to procure from the Collection of the Duke of Newcastle, a complete Copy of the Hystorie of Hamblet, which proves to be a translation from the French of Belleforest; and he tells me, that "all the chief incidents of the Play, and all the capital Characters are there in embryo, after a rude and barbarous manner: sentiments indeed there are none, that Shakespeare could borrow; nor any expression but one, which is, where Hamlet kills Polonius behind the arras: in doing which he is made to cry out, as in the Play, "a rat, a rat!"—So much for Saxo Grammaticus!

It is scarcely conceivable, how industriously the puritanical Zeal of the last age exerted itself in destroying, amongst better things, the innocent amusements of the former. Numberless Tales and Poems are alluded to in old Books, which are now perhaps no where to be found. Mr. Capell informs me, (and he is in these matters, the most able of all men to give information) that our Author appears to have been beholden to some Novels, which he hath yet only seen in French or Italian: but he adds, "to say they are not in some English dress, prosaic or metrical, and perhaps with circumstances nearer to his stories, is what I will not take upon me to do: nor indeed is it what I believe; but rather the contrary, and that time and accident will bring some of them to light, if not all."—

W. Painter, at the conclusion of the second Tome of his Palace of Pleasure, 1567, advertises the Reader, "bicause sodaynly (contrary to expectation) this Volume is risen to greater heape of leaues, I doe omit for this present time sundry Novels of mery devise, reseruing the same to be joyned with the rest of an other part, wherein shall succeede the remnant of Bandello, specially sutch (suffrable) as the learned French man François de Belleforrest hath selected, and the choysest done in the Italian. Some also out of Erizzo, Ser Giouanni Florentine, Parabosco, Cynthio, Straparole, Sansouino, and the best liked out of the Queene of Nauarre, and other Authors. Take these in good part, with those that haue and shall come forth."—But I am not able to find, that a third Tome was ever published: and it is very probable, that the Interest of his Booksellers, and more especially the prevailing Mode of the time, might lead him afterward to print his sundry Novels separately. If this were the case, it is no wonder, that such fugitive Pieces are recovered with difficulty, when the two Tomes, which Tom. Rawlinson would have called justa Volumina, are almost annihilated. Mr. Ames, who searched after books of this sort with the utmost avidity, most certainly had not seen them, when he published his Typographical Antiquities; as appears from his blunders about them: and possibly I myself might have remained in the fame predicament, had I not been favoured with a Copy by my generous Friend, Mr. Lort.

Mr. Colman, in the Preface to his elegant Translation of Terence, hath offered some arguments for the Learning of Shakespeare, which have been retailed with much confidence, since the appearance of Mr. Johnson's Edition.

"Besides the resemblance of particular passages scattered up and down in different plays, it is well known, that the Comedy of Errors is in great measure founded on the Menaechmi of Plautus; but I do not recollect ever to have seen it observed, that the disguise of the Pedant in the Taming of the Shrew, and his assuming the name and character of Vincentio, seem to be evidently taken from the disguise of the Sycophanta in the Trinummus of the said Author;
[b]
and there is a quotation from the Eunuch of Terence also, so familiarly introduced into the Dialogue of the Taming of the Shrew, that I think it puts the question of Shakespeare's having read the Roman Comick Poets in the original language out of all doubt, ‘Redime te captum, quam queas, minimo."’

With respect to resemblances, I shall not trouble you any further.—That the Comedy of Errors is founded on the Menaechmi, it is notorious: nor is it less so, that a Translation of it by W. W. perhaps William Warner, the Author of Albions England, was extant in the time of Shakespeare;[c] tho' Mr. Upton, and some other advocates for his learning, have cautiously dropt the mention of it. Besides this, (if indeed it were different) in the Gesta Grayorum, the Christmas Revels of the Gray's-Inn Gentlemen, 1594, "a Comedy of Errors like to Plautus his Menechmus was played by the Players." And the same hath been suspected to be the Subject of the goodlie Comedie of Plautus acted at Greenwich before the King and Queen in 1520; as we learn from Hall and Holingshed: — Riccoboni highly compliments the English on opening their stage so well; but unfortunately, Cavendish in his Life of Wolsey, calls it, an excellent Interlude in Latine. About the same time it was exhibited in German at Nuremburgh, by the celebrated Hanssach the Shoemaker.

"But a character in the Taming of the Shrew is borrowed from the Trinummus, and no translation of that was extant."

Mr. Colman indeed hath been better employ'd: but if he had met with an old Comedy, called Supposes, translated from Ariosto by George Gascoigne, [d] he certainly would not have appealed to Plautus. Thence Shakespeare borrowed this part of the Plot, (as well as some of the phraseology) though Theobald pronounces it his own invention: there likewise he found the quaint name of Petruchio. My young Master and his Man exchange habits and characters, and persuade a Scenaese, as he is called, to personate the Father, exactly as in the Taming of the Shrew, by the pretended danger of his coming from Sienna to Ferrara, contrary to the order of the government.

Still, Shakespeare quotes a line from the Eunuch of Terence: by memory too, and what is more, "purposely alters it, in order to bring the sense within the compass of one line."—This remark was previous to Mr. Johnsons; or indisputably it would not have been made at all. — "Our Author had this line from Lilly; which I mention that it may not be brought as an argument of his learning."

But how, cries an unprovoked Antagonist, can you take upon you to say, that he had it from Lilly, and not from Terence? [e] I will answer for Mr. Johnson, who is above answering for himself. — Because it is quoted as it appears in the Grammarian, and not as it appears in the Poet. — And thus we have done with the purposed alteration. Udall likewise in his "Floures for Latin speaking, gathered oute of Terence, 1560," reduces the passage to a single line, and subjoins a Translation.

We have hitherto supposed Shakespeare the Author of the Taming of the Shrew, but his property in it is extremely disputable. I will give you my opinion, and the reasons on which it is founded. I suppose then the present Play not originally the work of Shakespeare, but restored by him to the Stage, with the whole Induction of the Tinker, and some other occasional improvements; especially in the Character of Petruchio. It is very obvious, that the Induction and the Play were either the works of different hands, or written at a great interval of time: the former is in our Author's best manner, and the greater part of the latter in his worst, or even below it. Dr. Warburton declares it to be certainly spurious: and without doubt, supposing it to have been written by Shakespeare, it must have been one of his earliest productions; yet it is not mentioned in the List of his Works by Meres in 1598.

I have met with a facetious piece of Sir John Harrington, printed in 1596, (and possibly there may be an earlier Edition) called, The Metamorphosis of Ajax, where I suspect an allusion to the old Play; "Read the booke of Taming a Shrew, which hath made a number of us so perfect, that now every one can rule a Shrew in our Countrey, save he that hath hir." —I am aware, a modern Linguist may object, that the word Book does not at present seem dramatick, but it was once almost technically so: Gosson in his Schoole of Abuse, contayning a pleasaunt inuective against Poets, Pipers, Players, Jesters, and such like Caterpillars of a Common-wealth, 1579, mentions "twoo prose Bookes plaied at the Belsauage;" and Hearne tells us in a Note at the end of William of Worcester, that he had seen a MS. in the nature of a Play or Interlude, intitled, the Booke of Sir Thomas Moore."
[f]

And in fact, there is such an old anonymous Play in Mr. Pope's List. "A pleasant conceited History, called, The Taming of a Shrew— sundry times acted by the Earl of Pembroke his Servants." Which seems to have been republished by the Remains of that Company in 1607, when Shakespeare's copy appeared at the Black-Friars or the Globe. — Nor let this seem derogatory from the character of our Poet. There is no reason to believe, that he wanted to claim the Play as his own; it was not even printed 'till some years after his death: but he merely revived it on his Stage as a Manager. — Ravenscroft assures us, that this was really the case with Titus Andronicus; which, it may be observed, hath not Shakespeare's name on the Title-page of the only Edition published in his life-time. Indeed, from every internal mark, I have not the least doubt but this horrible Piece was originally written by the Author of the Lines thrown into the mouth of the Player in Hamlet, and of the Tragedy of Locrine: which likewise from some assistance perhaps given to his Friend, hath been unjustly and ignorantly charged upon Shakespeare.

But the sheet-anchor holds fast: Shakespeare himself hath left some Translations from Ovid. The Epistles, says One, of Paris and Helen give a sufficient proof of his acquaintance with that poet; and it may be concluded, says Another, that he was a competent judge of other Authors, who wrote in the same language.

This hath been the universal cry, from Mr. Pope himself to the Criticks of yesterday. Possibly, however, the Gentlemen will hesitate a moment, if we tell them, that Shakespeare was not the Author of these Translations. Let them turn to a forgotten book, by Thomas Heywood, called Britaines Troy, printed by W. Jaggard in 1609, Fol. and they will find these identical Epistles, "which being so pertinent to our Historie, says Heywood, I thought necessarie to translate."—How then came they ascribed to Shakespeare? We will tell them that likewise. The same voluminous Writer published an Apology for Actors, 4to. 1612, and in an Appendix directed to his new Printer Nic. Okes, he accuses his old One, Jaggard, of "taking the two Epistles of Paris to Helen, and Helen to Paris, and printing them in a less volume under the name of Another:— but he was much offended with Master Jaggard, that altogether unknowne to him, he had presumed to make so bold with his Name."[g] In the same work of Heywood are all the other Translations, which have been printed in the modern Editions of the Poems of Shakespeare.

You now hope for land: We have seen through little matters, but what must be done with a whole book?—In 1751, was reprinted "A compendious or briefe examination of certayne ordinary complaints of diuers of our Countrymen in these our days: which although they are in some parte unjust and friuolous, yet are they all by way of Dialogue throughly debated and discussed by William Shakespeare, Gentleman." 8vo.

This extraordinary piece was originally published in 4to, 1581, and dedicated by the Author, "To the most vertuous and learned Lady, his most deare and soveraigne Princesse, Elizabeth; being inforced by her Majesties late and singular clemency in pardoning certayne his unduetifull misdemeanour." And by the modern Editors, to the late King; as "a Treatise composed by the most extensive and fertile Genius, that ever any age or nation produced."

Here we join issue with the Writers of that excellent, tho' very unequal work, the Biographia Britannica: [h] if, say they, this piece could be written by our Poet, it would be absolutely decisive in the dispute about his learning; for many quotations appear in it from the Greek and Latin Classicks.

The concurring circumstances of the Name, and the Misdemeanor, which is supposed to be the old Story of Deer-stealing, seem fairly to challenge our Poet for the Author: but they hesitate. — His claim may appear to be confuted by the date 1581, when Shakespeare was only Seventeen, and the long experience, which the Writer talks of. — But I will not keep you in suspense: the book was not written by Shakespeare.

Strype, in his Annals, calls the Author SOME learned Man, and this gave me the first suspicion. I knew very well, that honest John (to use the language of Sir Thomas Bodley) did not waste his time with such baggage books as Plays and Poems; yet I must suppose, that he had heard of the name of Shakespeare. After a while I met with the original Edition. Here in the Title-page, and at the end of the Dedication, appear only the Initials, W. S. Gent. and presently I was informed by Anthony Wood, that the book in question was written, not by William Shakespeare, but by William Stafford, Gentleman:[i] which at once accounted for the Misdemeanour in the Dedication. For Stafford had been concerned at that time, and was indeed afterward, as Camden and the other Annalists inform us, with some of the conspirators against Elizabeth; which he properly calls his unduetifull behaviour.

I hope by this time, that any One open to conviction may be nearly satisfied; and I will promise to give you on this head very little more trouble.

The justly celebrated Mr. Warton hath favoured us, in his Life of Dr. Bathurst, with some hearsay particulars concerning Shakespeare from the papers of Aubrey, which had been in the hands of Wood; and I ought not to suppress them, as the last seems to make against my doctrine. They came originally, I find, on consulting the MS. from one Mr. Beeston: and I am sure Mr. Warton, whom I have the honour to call my Friend, and an Associate in the question, will be in no pain about their credit.

"William Shakespeare's Father was a Butcher, — while he was a Boy be exercised his Father's trade, but when he killed a Calf, he would do it in a high stile, and make a speech. This William being inclined naturally to Poetry and Acting, came to London, I guess, about eighteen, and was an Actor in one of the Playhouses, and did act exceedingly well. He began early to make Essays in dramatique Poetry.— The humour of the Constable in the Midsummer Night's Dream he happen'd to take at Crendon [k] in Bucks.— I think, I have been told, that he left near three hundred pounds to a Sister. — He understood Latin pretty well, FOR he had been in his younger yeares a Schoolmaster in the Country."

I will be short in my animadversions; and take them in their order.

The account of the Trade of the Family is not only contrary to all other Tradition, but, as it may seem, to the instrument from the Herald's office, so frequently reprinted.— Shakespeare most certainly went to London, and commenced Actor thro' necessity, not natural inclination. —Nor have we any reason to suppose, that he did act exceedingly well. Rowe tells us from the information of Betterton, who was inquisitive into this point, and had very early opportunities of Inquiry from Sir W. Davenant, that he was no extraordinary Actor; and that the top of his performance was the Ghost in his own Hamlet. Yet this Chef d' Oeuvre did not please: I will give you an original stroke at it. Dr. Lodge, who was for ever pestering the town with Pamphlets, published in the year 1596, Wits miserie, and the Worlds madnesse, discovering the Devils incarnat of this Age. 4to. One of these Devils is Hate-virtue, or Sorrow for another mans good successe, who, says the Doctor, is "a foule lubber, and looks as pale as the Visard of the Ghost, which cried so miserably at the Theatre, like an Oister-wife, Hamlet revenge." Thus you see Mr. Holt's supposed proof, in the Appendix to the late Edition, that Hamlet was written after 1597, or perhaps 1602, will by no means hold good; whatever might be the case of the particular passage on which it is founded.

Nor does it appear, that Shakespeare did begin early to make Essays in Dramatique Poetry: the Arraignment of Paris, 1584, which hath so often been ascribed to him on the credit of Kirkman and Winstanley, [l] was written by George Peele; and Shakespeare is not met with, even as an Assistant, 'till at least seven years afterward.[m] — Nash in his Epistle to the Gentlemen Students of both Universities, prefixed to Greene's Arcadia, 4to. black Letter, recommends his Friend, Peele, "as the chiefe supporter of pleasance now living, the Atlas of Poetrie, and primus Verborum artifex: whose first increase, the Arraignment of Paris, might plead to their opinions his pregnant dexteritie of wit and manifold varietie of inuention."[n]

In the next place, unfortunately, there is neither such a Character as a Constable in the Midsummer Night's Dream: nor was the three hundred pounds Legacy to a Sister, but a Daughter.

And to close the whole, it is not possible, according to Aubrey himself, that Shakespeare could have been some years a Schoolmaster in the Country,: on which circumstance only the supposition of his learning is professedly founded. He was not surely very young, when he was employed to kill Calves, and he commenced Player about Eighteen!—The truth is, that he left his Father, for a Wife, a year sooner; and had at least two Children born at Stratford before he retired from thence to London. It is therefore sufficiently clear, that poor Anthony had too much reason for his character of Aubrey: You will find it in his own Account of his Life, published by Hearne, which I would earnestly recommend to any Hypochondriack;

"A pretender to Antiquities, roving, magotie-headed, and sometimes little better than crased: and being exceedingly credulous, would stuff his many Letters sent to A. W. with folliries and misinformations." p. 577.

Thus much for the Learning of Shakespeare with respect to the ancient languages: indulge me with an observation or two on his supposed knowledge of the modern ones, and I will promise to release you.

"It is evident, we have been told, that he was not unacquainted with the Italian:" but let us inquire into the Evidence.

Certainly some Italian words and phrases appear in the Works of Shakespeare; yet if we had nothing else to observe, their Orthography might lead us to suspect them to be not of the Writer's importation. But we can go further, and prove this.

When Pistol "chears up himself with ends of verse," he is only a copy of Hanniball Gonsaga, who ranted on yielding himself a Prisoner to an English Captain in the Low Countries, as you may read in an old Collection of Tales, called Wits, Fits, and Fancies, [o]

"Si Fortuna me tormenta,

Il speranza me contenta."

And Sir Richard Hawkins, in his Voyage to the South-Sea, 1593, throws out the same jingling Distich on the loss of his Pinnace.

"Master Page, sit; good Master Page, sit; Proface. What you want in meat, we'll have in drink," says Justice Shallow's Fac totum, Davy, in the 2d Part of Henry the 4th.

Proface, Sir Thomas Hanmer observes to be Italian from profaccia, much good may it do you. Mr. Johnson rather thinks it a mistake for perforce. Sir Thomas however is right; yet it is no argument for his Author's Italian knowledge.

Old Heywood, the Epigrammatist, addressed his Readers long before,

"Readers, reade this thus: for Preface, Proface,

Much good do it you, the poore repast here, &c."

Woorkes. Lond. 4to. 1562.
And Dekker in his Play, If it be not good, the Diuel is in it, (which is certainly true, for it is full of Devils) makes Shackle-soule, in the character of Friar Rush, tempt his Brethren with "choice of dishes" ‘"To which proface; with blythe lookes sit yee."’ Nor hath it escaped the quibbling manner of the Water-poet, in the title of a Poem prefixed to his Praise of Hempseed, "A Preamble, Preatrot, Preagallop, Preapace, or Preface; and Proface, my Masters, if your Stomacks serve."

But the Editors are not contented without coining Italian. "Rivo, says the Drunkard," is an Expression of the madcap prince of Wales; which Sir Thomas Hanmer corrects to Ribi, Drink away, or again, as it should rather be translated. Dr. Warburton accedes to this; and Mr. Johnson hath admitted it into his Text; but with an observation, that Rivo might possibly be the cant of English Taverns. And so indeed it was: it occurs frequently in Marston. Take a quotation from his Comedy of What you will; 1607.

"Musicke, Tobacco, Sacke, and Sleepe,

The Tide of Sorrow backward keep:

If thou art sad at others fate,

Rivo, drink deep, give care the mate."

In Love's Labour lost, Boyet calls Don Armado,

—— "A Spaniard that keeps here in Court,

A Phantasme, a Monarcho." —

Here too Sir Thomas is willing to palm Italian upon us. We should read, it seems, Mammuccio, a Mammet, or Puppet: Ital. Mammuccia. But the allusion is to a fantastical Character of the time. — "Popular applause, says Meres, dooth nourish some, neither do they gape after any other thing, but vaine praise and glorie, — as in our age Peter Shakerlye of Paules, and MONARCHO that liued about the Court." p. 178.

I fancy, you will be satisfied with one more instance.

"Baccare, You are marvellous forward, quoth Gremio to Petruchio in the Taming of the Shrew.

"But not so forward, says Mr. Theobald, as our Editors are indolent. This is a stupid corruption of the press, that none of them have dived into. We must read Baccalare, as Mr. Warburton acutely observed to me, by which the Italians mean, Thou ignorant, presumptuous Man." — "Properly indeed, adds Mr. Heath, a graduated Scholar, but ironically and sarcastically, a pretender to Scholarship."

This is admitted by the Editors and Criticks of every Denomination. Yet the word is neither wrong, nor Italian: it was an old proverbial one, used frequently by John Heywood; who hath made, what he pleases to call, Epigrams upon it.

Take two of them, such as they are,

"Backare, quoth Mortimer to his Sow:

"Went that Sow backe at that biddyng trowe you?"

"Backare, quoth Mortimer to his sow: se

Mortimers sow speakth as good latin as he."

Howel takes this from Heywood, in his Old Sawes and Adages: and Philpot introduces it into the Proverbs collected by Camden.

We have but few observations concerning Shakespeare's knowledge of the Spanish tongue. Dr. Grey indeed is willing to suppose, that the Plot of Romeo and Juliet may be borrowed from a COMEDY of Lopes de Vega. But the Spaniard, who was certainly acquainted with Bandello, hath not only changed the Catastrophe, but the names of the Characters. Neither Romeo nor Juliet; neither Montague nor Capulet appears in this performance: and how came they to the knowledge of Shakespeare? — Nothing is more certain, than that he chiefly followed the Translation by Painter from the French of Boisteau, and hence arise the Deviations from Bandello's original Italian. [p] It seems however from a passage in Ames's Typographical Antiquities, that Painter was not the only Translator of this popular Story: and it is possible therefore, that Shakespeare might have other assistance.

In the Induction to the Taming of the Shrew, the Tinker attempts to talk Spanish: and consequently the Author himself was acquainted with it, ‘ "Paucus pallabris, let the World slide, Sessa." ’ But this is a burlesque on Hieronymo; the piece of Bombast, that I have mentioned to you before:

"What new device have they devised, trow?

Pocas pallabras, &c. —

Mr. Whalley tells us, "the Author of this piece hath the happiness to be at this time unknown, the remembrance of him having perished with himself:" Philips and others ascribe it to one William Smith: but I take this opportunity of informing him, that it was written by Thomas Kyd; if he will accept the authority of his Contemporary, Heywood.

More hath been said concerning Shakespeare's acquaintance with the French language. In the Play of Henry the fifth, we have a whole Scene in it: and in other places it occurs familiarly in the Dialogue.

We may observe in general, that the early Editions have not half the quantity; and every sentence, or rather every word most ridiculously blundered. These, for several reasons, could not possibly be published by the Author;[q] and it is extremely probable, that the French ribaldry was at first inserted by a different hand, as the many additions most certainly were after he had left the Stage. — Indeed, every friend to his memory will not easily believe, that he was acquainted with the Scene between Catharine and the old Gentlewoman; or surely he would not have admitted such obscenity and nonsense.

Mr. Hawkins, in the Appendix to Mr. Johnson's Edition, hath an ingenious observation to prove, that Shakespeare, supposing the French to be his, had very little knowledge of the language.

"Est-il impossible d'eschapper la force de ton Bras?" says a Frenchman.— "Brass, cur?" replies Pistol.

"Almost any one knows, that the French word Bras is pronounced Brau; and what resemblance of sound does this bear to Brass?" —

Mr. Johnson makes a doubt, whether the pronunciation of the French language may not be changed, since Shakespeare's time, "if not, says he, it may be suspected that some other man wrote the French scenes:" but this does not appear to be the case, at least in this termination, from the rules of the Grammarians, or the practice of the Poets. I am certain of the former from the French Alphabeth of De la Mothe, [r] and the Orthoepia Gallica of John Eliot;[s] and of the latter from the Rhymes of Marot, Ronsard, and Du Bartas. — Connections of this kind were very common. Shakespeare himself assisted Ben. Jonson in his Sejanus, as it was originally written; and Fletcher in his Two noble Kinsmen.

But what if the French scene were occasionally introduced into every Play on this Subject? and perhaps there were more than one before our Poet's. — In Pierce Penilesse his Supplication to the Diuell, 4to. 1592. (which, it seems, from the Epistle to the Printer, was not the first Edition,) the Author, Nash, exclaims, "What a glorious thing it is to have Henry the fifth represented on the Stage leading the French King prisoner, and forcing both him and the Dolphin to sweare fealty!" — And it appears from the Jests of the famous Comedian, Tarlton, 4to. 1611. that he had been particularly celebrated in the Part of the Clown in Henry the fifth; but no such Character exists in the Play of Shakespeare. — Henry the sixth hath ever been doubted; and a passage in the above-quoted piece of Nash may give us reason to believe, it was previous to our Author. "How would it haue joyed braue Talbot (the terror of the French) to thinke that after he had lyen two hundred yeare in his Toomb, he should triumph again on the Stage; and haue his bones new embalmed with the teares of ten thousand spectators at least (at seuerall times) who in the Tragedian that represents his person, imagine they behold him fresh bleeding."—I have no doubt but Henry the sixth had the same Author with Edward the third, which hath been recovered to the world in Mr. Capell's Prolusions.

It hath been observed, that the Giant of Rabelais is sometimes alluded to by Shakespeare: and in his time no translation was extant. — But the Story was in every one's hand.

In a Letter by one Laneham, or Langham, for the name is written differently, [t] concerning the Entertainment at Killingwoorth Castle, printed 1575, we have a list of the vulgar Romances of the age, "King Arthurz book, Huon of Burdeaus, Friar Rous, Howleglass, and GARGANTUA. Meres [u] mentions him as equally hurtful to young minds with the Four Sons of Aymon, and the Seven Champions. And John Taylor hath him likewise in his catalogue of Authors, prefixed to Sir Gregory Nonsence. [x]

But to come to a conclusion, I will give you an irrefragable argument, that Shakespeare did not understand two very common words in the French and Latin languages.

According to the Articles of agreement between the Conqueror Henry and the King of France, the latter was to stile the former, (in the corrected French of the modern Editions,) "Nostre tres cher filz Henry Roy d' Angleterre; and in Latin, Praeclarissimus Filius, &c." What, says Dr. Warburton, is tres cher in French, praeclarissimus in Latin! we should read praecarissimus. — This appears to be exceedingly true; but how came the blunder? it is a typographical one in Holingshed, which Shakespeare copied; but must indisputably have corrected, had he been acquainted with the languages. — "Our said Father, during his life, shall name, call, and write us in French in this maner: Nostre tres chier filz, Henry Roy d' Engleterre — and in Latine in this maner, Praeclarissimus filius noster." Edit 1587. p. 574.

To corroborate this instance, let me observe to you, though it be nothing further to the purpose, that another error of the same kind hath been the source of a mistake in an historical passage of our Author; which hath ridiculously troubled the Criticks.

Richard the third [y] harangues his army before the Battle of Bosworth,

"Remember whom ye are to cope withal,

A sort of vagabonds, of rascals, runaways —

And who doth lead them but a paltry fellow

Long kept in Britaine at our Mother's cost,

A milksop, &c." —

"Our Mother," Mr. Theobald perceives to be wrong, and Henry was somewhere secreted on the Continent: he reads therefore, and all the Editors after him, ‘"Long kept in Bretague at his mother's cost."’

But give me leave to transcribe a few more lines from Holingshed, and you will find at once, that Shakespeare had been there before me: — "Ye see further, how a companie of traitors, theeves, outlaws and runnagates be aiders and partakers of his feat and enterprise. — And to begin with the erle of Richmond captaine of this rebellion, he is a Welsh milksop — brought up by my Moother's meanes and mine, like a captive in a close cage in the court of Francis duke of Britaine." p. 756.

Holingshed copies this verbatim from his Brother Chronicler Hall, Edit. 1548. fol. 54. but his Printer hath given us by accident the word Moother instead of Brother; as it is in the Original, and ought to be in Shakespeare. [z]

I hope, my good Friend, you have by this time acquitted our great Poet of all piratical depredations on the Ancients, and are ready to receive my Conclusion. — He remembered perhaps enough of his school-boy learning to put the Hig, hag, hog, into the mouth of Sir Hugh Evans; and might pick up in the Writers of the time, [a] or the course of his conversation a familiar phrase or two of French or Italian: but his Studies were most demonstratively confined to Nature and his own Language.

In the course of this disquisition, you have often smiled at "all such reading, as was never read:" and possibly I may have indulged it too far: but it is the reading necessary for a Comment on Shakespeare. Those who apply solely to the Ancients for this purpose, may with equal wisdom study the TALMUD for an Exposition of TRISTRAM SHANDY. Nothing but an intimate acquaintance with the Writers of the time, who are frequently of no other value, can point out his allusions, and ascertain his Phraseology. The Reformers of his Text are for ever equally positive, and equally wrong. The Cant of the Age, a provincial Expression, an obscure Proverb, an obsolete Custom, a Hint at a Person or a Fact no longer remembered, hath continually defeated the best of our Guessers: You must not suppose me to speak at random, when I assure you, that from some forgotten book or other, I can demonstrate this to you in many hundred Places; and I almost wish, that I had not been persuaded into a different Employment.

Tho' I have as much of the Natale Solum about me, as any man whatsoever; yet, I own, the Primrose Path is still more pleasing than the Fosse or the Watling Street:

"Age cannot wither it, nor custom stale

It's infinite variety." —

And when I am fairly rid of the Dust of topographical Antiquity, which hath continued much longer about me than I expected; you may very probably be troubled again with the ever fruitful Subject of SHAKESPEARE and his COMMENTATORS.

FINIS.

Notes

a
Mr. Seward in his Preface to Beaumont and Fletcher, 10 Vol. 8vo. 1750.
↵

b
This passage of Ben. Jonson, so often quoted, is given us in the admirable preface to the late Edition, with a various reading, "small Latin and no Greek," which hath been held up to the Publick for a modern sophistication: yet whether an error or not, it was adopted above a Century ago by W. Towers in a Panegyrick on Cartwright. His Eulogy, with more than fifty others, on this now forgotten Poet, was prefixed to the Edit. 1651.
↵

c
"Though thou hadst small Latin, &c."
↵

d
In his Elegie on Poets and Poesie. p. 206. Fol. 1627.
↵

e
From his Poem "upon Master William Shakespeare," intended to have been prefixed, with the other of his composition, to the Folio of 1623; and afterward printed in several miscellaneous Collections: particularly the spurious Edition of Shakespeare's Poems, 1640. Some account of him may be met with in Wood's Athenae.
↵

f
Hence perhaps the ill-star'd rage between this Critick and his elder Brother, John Dennis, so pathetically lamented in the Dunciad. Whilst the former was persuaded, that "the man who doubts of the Learning of Shakespeare, hath none of his own:" the latter, above regarding the attack in his private capacity, declares with great patriotic vehemence, that "he who allows Shakespeare had Learning, and a familiar acquaintance with the Ancients, ought to be looked upon as a detractor from the Glory of Great Britain." Dennis was expelled his College for attempting to stab a man in the dark: Pope would have been glad of this anecdote.
↵

g
It is extraordinary, that this Gentleman should attempt so voluminous a work, as the Revisal of Shakespeare's Text, when, he tells us in his Preface, "he was not so fortunate as to be furnished with either of the Folio Editions, much less any of the ancient Quarto's:" and even "Sir Thomas Hanmer's performance was known to him only by Mr. Warburton's representation."
↵

h
I find the character of this work pretty early delineated;

"'Twas Greek at first, that Greek was Latin made,

That Latin French, that French to English straid:

Thus 'twixt one Plutarch there's more difference,

Than i'th' same Englishman return'd from France."

↵

i
See Theobald's Preface to K. Richard 2d. 8vo. 1720.
↵

k
By Henry Stephens and Elias Andreas. Par. 1554. 4to. ten years before the birth of Shakespeare. The former Version hath been ascribed without reason to John Dorat. Many other Translators appeared before the end of the Century: and particularly the Ode in question was made popular by Buchanan, whose pieces were soon to be met with in almost every modern language.
↵

l
It was originally drawn into Englishe by Caxton under the name of the Recuyel of the Historyes of Troy, from the French of the ryght venerable Person and worshipfull man Raoul le Feure, and fynyshed in the holy citye of Colen, the 19 day of Septembre, the yere of our Lord God, a thousand foure hundred sixty and enleuen. Wynken de Worde printed an Edit. Fol. 1503. and there have been several subsequent ones.
↵

m
"Who list thistory of Patroclus to reade, &c."

Ship of Fooles. 1570. p. 21.

↵

n

Nepenthe is a drinck of soueragne grace,

Deuized by the Gods, for to asswage

Harts grief, and bitter gall away to chace—

In stead thereof sweet peace and quietage

It doth establish in the troubled mynd, &c."

Faerie Queene. 1596. B. 4. C. 3. St. 43.

↵

o

It is very remarkable, that the Bishop is called by his Countryman, Sir David Lindsey, in his Complaint of our Souerane Lordis Papingo, ‘"In our Inglische Rethorick the Rose."’

And Dunbar hath a similar expression in his beautiful Poem of The Goldin Terge.

↵

p
Aristophanis Comoediae undecim. Gr. & Lat. Amst. 1710. Fol. p. 596.
↵

q
Dr. Warburton corrects Orphan to Ouphen; and not without plausibility, as the word Ouphes occurs both before and afterward. But I fancy, in acquiescence to the vulgar doctrine, the address in this line is to apart of the Troop, as Mortals by birth, but adopted by the Fairies: Orphans, with respect to their real Parents, and now only dependant on Destiny herself. A few lines from Spenser will sufficiently illustrate the passage.

"The man whom heauens have ordaynd to bee

The spouse of Britomart, is Arthegall:

He wonneth in the land of Fayeree,

Yet is no Fary borne, ne sib at all

To Elfes, but sprong of seed terrestriall,

And whilome by false Faries stolen away,

Whyles yet in infant cradle he did crall, &c."

Edit. 1590. B. 3. C. 3. St. 26,

↵

r
Revisal. p. 75.323. & 561.
↵

s
History of his Life and Times. p. 102. preserved by his Dupe, Mr. Ashmole.
↵

t
Lond. 4to. 1582. She reports in the fourth dayes exercise, the rare Historie of Promos and Cassandra. A marginal note informs us, that Whetstone was the Author of the Commedie on that subject; which likewise had probably fallen into the hands of Shakespeare.
↵

u
"The tale is a pretie comicall matter, and hath bin written in English verse some few years past, learnedly and with good grace, by M. George Turberuil." Harrington's Ariosto. Fol. 1591. p. 39.
↵

x
See Meres's Wits Treasury. 1598. p. 282.
↵

y

Our ancient Poets are under greater obligations to Boccace, than is generally imagined. Who would suspect, that Chaucer hath borrowed from an Italian the facetious Tale of the Miller of Trumpington?

Mr. Dryden observes on the Epic performance, Palamon and Arcite, a poem little inferior in his opinion to the Iliad or the Aeneid, that the name of it's Author is wholly lost, and Chaucer is now become the Original. But he is mistaken: this too was the work of Boccace, and printed at Ferrara in Folio, con il commento di Andrea Bassi, 1475. I have seen a copy of it, and a Translation into modern Greek, in the noble Library of the very learned and communicative Dr. Askew.

It is likewise to be met with in old French, under the Title of La Theseide de Jean Boccace, contenant les belles & chastes amours de deux jeunes Chevaliers Thebains Arcite & Palemon.

↵

z
In the first Vol. of the Palace of Pleasure. 4to. 1566.
↵

a
Confessio Amantis, printed by T. Berthelet. Fol. 1532. p. 175, &c.
↵

b
"William Caluerley, of Caluerley in Yorkshire, Esquire, murdered two of his owne children in his owne house, then stabde his wife into the body with full intent to haue killed her, and then instantlie with like fury went from his house, to haue slaine his yongest childe at nurse, but was preuented. Hee was prest to death in Yorke the 5 of August. 1604." Edm. Howes' Continuation of John Stowe's Summarie. 8vo. 1607. p. 574. The Story appeared before in a 4to. Pamphlet. 1605. it is ommitted in the Folio Chronicle. 1631.
↵

c
These however, he assures Mr. Hill, were the property of Dr. Arbuthnot.
↵

d
Thus a line in Hamlet's description of the Player, should be printed as in the old Folio's, ‘"Tears in his eyes, distraction in's aspéct."’ agreeably to the accent in a hundred other places.
↵

e
Middleton, in an obscure Play, called, A Game at Chesse, hath some very pleasing lines on a similar occasion:

"Upon those lips, the sweete fresh buds of youth,

The holy dew of prayer lies like pearle,

Dropt from the opening eye-lids of the morne

Upon the bashfull Rose."—

↵

f

Had our zealous Puritan been acquainted with the real crime of De Mehun, he would not have joined in the clamour against him. Poor Jehan, it seems, had raised the expectations of a Monastery in France, by the Legacy of a great Chest, and the weighty Contents of it; but it proved to be filled with nothing better than Vetches. The Friars, enraged at the ridicule and disappointment, would not suffer him to have Christian burial. See the Hon. Mr. Barrington's very learned and curious Observations on the Statutes. 4to. 1766. p. 24. From the Annales d' Acquytayne, Par. 1537.

Our Author had his full share in distressing the Spirit of this restless man. "Some Play-books are grown from Quarto into Folio; which yet bear so good a price and sale, that I cannot but with griefe relate it. — Shackspeers Plaies are printed in the best Crowne-paper, far better than most Bibles!"

↵

g
Others would give up this passage for the Vera incessu patuit Dea; but I am not able to see any improvement in the matter: even supposing the Poet had been speaking of Juno, and no previous Translation were extant.
↵

h

This passage recalls to my memory a very extraordinary fact. A few years ago, at a great Court on the Continent, a Countryman of our's of high rank and character, [Sir C. H. W.] exhibited with many other Candidates his complimental Epigram on the Birth-day, and carried the prize in triumph,

"O Regina orbis prima & pulcherrima: ridens

Es Venus, incedens Juno, Minerva loquens."

Literally stolen from Angerianus,

"Tres quondam nudas vidit Priameius heros

Luce deas; video tres quoque luce deas.

Hoc majus; tres uno in corpore: Coelia ridens

Est Venus, incedens Juno, Minerva loquens."

Delitiae Ital. Poet. by Gruter, under the anagrammatic Name of Ranutius Gherus. 1608. V. 1. p. 189.

Perhaps the latter part of the Epigram was met with in a whimsical book, which had it's day of Fame, Robert Burton's Anatomy of Melancholy. Fol. 1652. 6th Edit. p. 520.

↵

i
Cap. 1. 4to. 1555.
↵

k
Amongst "the things, which Mayster More wrote in his youth for his pastime," prefixed to his Workes. 1557. Fol.
↵

l
Printed amongst the Works of Chaucer, but really written by Robert Henderson.
↵

m
It is observable, that Hyperion is used by Spenser with the same error in quantity.
↵

n

The Troye Boke was somewhat modernized, and reduced into regular Stanza's, about the beginning of the last century, under the name of the "Life and Death of Hector—who fought a hundred mayne Battailes in open field against the Grecians; wherein there were slaine on both sides Fourteene Hundred and Sixe Thousand, Fourscore and Sixe men." Fol. no date. This work, Dr. Fuller and several other criticks have erroneously quoted as the Original; and observe in consequence, that "if Chaucer's Coin were of greater weight for deeper learning, Lydgate's were of a more refined standard for purer language: so that one might mistake him for a modern Writer!"

Let me here make an observation for the benefit of the next Editor of Chaucer. Mr. Urry, probably misled by his predecessor, Speght, was determined, Procrustes-like, to force every line in the Canterbury Tales to the same Standard: but a precise number of Syllables was not the Object of our old Poets. Lydgate, after the example of his Master, very fairly acknowledges,

"Well wot I | moche thing is wronge,

Falsely metryd | both of short and longe."

and Chaucer himself was persuaded, that the Rime might possibly be

— "Somewhat agreáble,

Though some Verse faile in a Sylláble."

In short, the attention was directed to the Caesural pause, as the Grammarians call it; which is carefully marked in every line of Lydgate: and Gascoigne in his Certayne notes of Instruction concerning the making of Verse, observes very truly of Chaucer, "Whosoeuer do peruse and well consider his workes, he shall find, that although his lines are not alwayes of one selfe same number of Syllables, yet beyng redde by one that hath understanding, the longest verse and that which hath most syllables in it, will fall to the Eare correspondent unto that which hath fewest syllables in it: and likewise that whiche hath in it fewest syllables shall be founde yet to consist of wordes that have suche naturall sounde, as may seeme equall in length to a verse which hath many moe syllables of lighter accents." 4to. 1575.

↵

o

——"Aliae panduntur inanes

Suspensae ad ventos: aliis sub gurgite vasto

Infectum eluitur scelus, aut exuritur igni."

↵

p
At the ende of the Festyuall, drawen oute of Legenda aurea. 4to. 1508. it was first printed by Caxton, 1483. "in helpe of such Clerkes who excuse theym for defaute of bokes, and also by symplenes of connynge."
↵

q
On all soules daye. p. 152.
↵

r
Islandiae Descript. Lugd. Bat. 1607. p. 46.
↵

s
In some Remarks on the Tempest, published under the quaint Title of "An attempte to rescue that aunciente English Poet and Play-wrighte, Maister Williaume Shakespeare, from the many Errours, faulsely charged upon him by certaine new-fangled Wittes." Lond. 8vo. 1749. p. 81.
↵

t
His work is dedicated to the Earl of Leicester in a long Epistle in verse, from Berwicke, Apr. 20. 1567.
↵

u
M. Bayle hath delineated the singular character of our fantastical Author. His work was originally translated by one Zacharie Jones. My Edit. is in 4to. 1605. with an anonymous Dedication to the King: the Devonshire Story was therefore well known in the time of Shakespeare.—— The passage from Scaliger is likewise to be met with in The Optick Glasse of Humors, written, I believe, by T. Wombwell; and in several other places.
↵

x

His Poems are printed with the title of "Pithy, Pleasaunt, and Profitable Workes of Maister Skelton, Poete Laureate." — But, says Mr. Cibber, after several other Writers, "how or by what Interest he was made Laureat, or whether it was a title he assumed to himself, cannot be determined." — This is an error pretty generally received, and it may be worth our while to remove it.

A facetious Author says somewhere, that a Poet Laureat, in the modern Idea, is a Gentleman, who hath an annual Stipend for reminding us of the Neva Year, and the Birth-day: but formerly a Poet Laureat was a real University Graduate.

"Skelton wore the Lawrell wreath

And past in schoels ye knoe."

says Churchyarde in the Poem prefixed to his Works. And Master Caxton in his Preface to The boke of Eneydos, 1490. hath a passage, which well deserves to be quoted without abridgment: "I praye mayster John Skelton, late created poete laureate in the unyversite of Oxenforde, to oversee and correcte thys sayd booke, and taddresse and expowne whereas shall be founde faulte, to theym that shall requyre it; for hym I knowe for suffycyent to expowne and Englysshe every dyfficulte that is therein; for he hath late translated the epystles of Tulle, and the book of Dyodorus Syculus, and diverse other workes, out of Latyn into Englisshe, not in rude and old langage, but in polyshed and ornate termes, craftely, as he that hath redde Vyrgyle, Ouyde, Tullye, and all the other noble poets and oratours, to me unknowen: and also he hath redde the IX muses, and understands their musicalle scyences, and to whom of them eche scyence is appropred: I suppose he hath dronken of Elycons well!"

I find, from Mr. Baker's MSS. that our Laureat was admitted ad eundem at Cambridge: "An. Dom. 1493. & Hen. 7. nono. Conceditur Jobī Skelton Poete in partibus transmarinis atque Oxon. Laureâ ornato, ut apud nos eâdem decoraretur." And afterward, "An. 1504/5; Conceditur Jobī Skelton, Poetae Laureat. quod possit stare eodem gradu hic, quo stetit Oxoniis, & quod possit uti habitu sibi concesso à Principe."

See likewise Dr. Knight's Life of Colet. p. 122. And Recherches sur les Poetes couronnez, par M. l' Abbé du Resnel, in the Memoires de Litterature. Vol. 10. Paris. 4to. I736.

↵

y
Mr. Johnson's Edit. V. 8. p. 171.
↵

z
I have met with a Writer who tells us, that a Translation of the Offices was printed by Caxton, in the year 1481: but such a book never existed. It is a mistake for "Tullius of olde age," by John Tiptoft, Earl of Worcester.
↵

a
"Falsitatis enim (Hamlethus) alienus haberi cupidus, ita astutiam veriloquio permiscebat, ut nec dictis veracitas deesset, nec acuminis modus verorum judicio proderetur." This is quoted, as it had been before, in Mr. Guthrie's Essay on Tragedy, with a small variation from the Original. See Edit. Fol. 1644. p. 50.
↵

b
This observation of Mr. Colman is quoted by his very ingenious Colleague, Mr. Thornton, in his Translation of this Play: who further remarks, in another part of it, that a passage in Romeo and Juliet, where Shakespeare speaks of the contradiction in the nature of Love, is very much in the manner of his Author:

"Amor — mores hominum moros & morosos efficit.

Minus placet quod suadetur, quod disuadetur placet.

Quom inopia'st, cupias, quando ejus copia'st, tum non velis. &c."

Which he translates with ease and elegance,

—— "Love makes a man a fool,

Hard to be pleas'd. — What you'd persuade him to,

He likes not, and embraces that, from which

You would dissuade him. — What there is a lack of,

That will he covet; — when 'tis in his power,

He'll none on't."—

Act 3. Scene 3.

Let us now turn to the passage in Shakespeare:

—"O brawling Love! O loving hate! —

O heavy lightness! serious vanity!

Mis-shapen Chaos of well-seeming forms!

Feather of lead, bright smoke, cold fire, sick health!

Still-waking Sleep! that is not what it is!"

Shakespeare, I am sure, in the opinion of Mr. Thornton, did not want a Plautus to teach him the workings of Nature; nor are his Parallelisms produced with any such implication: but, I suppose, a peculiarity appears here in the manner of expression, which however was extremely the humour of the Age. Every Sonetteer characterises Love by contrarieties. Watson begins one of his Canzonets,

"Love is a sowre delight, a sugred griefe

A living death, an euer-dying life, &c."

Turberville makes Reason harangue against it in the same manner,

"A fierie Frost, a Flame that frozen is with Ise!

A heavie Burden light to beare! a Vertue fraught with Vice! &c."

Immediately from the Romaunt of the Rose,

"Loue it is an hatefull pees

A free acquitaunce without reles —

An heavie burthen light to beare

A wicked wawe awaie to weare:

And health full of maladie

And charitie full of envie —

A laughter that is weping aie

Rest that trauaileth night and daie, &c."

This kind of Antithesis was very much the taste of the Provençal and Italian Poets; perhaps it might be hinted by the Ode of Sappho preserved by Longinus: Petrarch is full of it,

"Pace non trovo, & non hó da far guerra,

Et temo, & spero, & ardo, & son un ghiaccio,

Et volo sopra'l cielo, & ghiaccio in terra,

Et nulla stringo, & tuttol mondo abbraccio. &c."

Sonetto 105.

Sir Thomas Wyat gives a translation of this Sonnet, without any notice of the Original, under the title of "Description of the contrarious passions in a Louer." Amongst the Songes and Sonettes, by the Earle of Surrey, and Others. 1574.
↵

c
It was published in 4to. 1595. The Printer of Langbaine, p. 524. hath accidently given the date, 1515, which hath been copied implicitly by Gildon, Theobald, Cooke, and several others. Warner is now almost forgotten, yet the old Criticks esteemed him one of "our chiefe heroical Makers."—Meres informs us, that he had "heard him termed of the best wits of both our Universities, our English Homer."
↵

d
His works were first collected under the singular title of "A hundreth sundrie Flowres bounde up in one small Poesie. Gathered partly (by translation) in the fyne outlandish Gardins of Euripides, Ouid, Petrarke, Ariosto, and others: and partly by inuention, out of our owne fruitefull Orchardes in Englande: yelding sundrie sweete sauours of Tragical, Comical, and Morall Discourses, bothe pleasaunt and profitable to the well smellyng noses of learned Readers." Black Letter. 4to. no date.
↵

e
W. Kenrick's Review of Dr. Johnson's Edit. of Shakespeare. 1765. 8vo. p. 105.
↵

f
I know indeed, there is extant a very old Poem, in black Letter, to which it might have been supposed Sir John Harrington alluded, had he not spoken of the Discovery as a new one, and recommended it as worthy the notice of his Countrymen: I am persuaded the method in the old Bard will not be thought either. At the end of the sixth Volume of Leland's Itinerary, we are favoured by Mr. Hearne with a Macaronic Poem on a Battle at Oxford between the Scholars and the Townsmen: on a line of which,
"Invadunt aulas bycheson cum forth geminantes,"
our Commentator very wisely and gravely remarks: "Bycheson, id est, Son of a Byche, ut è Codice Rawlinsoniano edidi. Eo nempe modo quo et olim Whorson dixerunt pro Son of a Whore. Exempla habemus cum alibi tum in libello quodam lepido & antiquo (inter Codices Seldenianos in Bibl. Bodl.) qui inscribitur: The Wife lapped in Morels Skyn: or the Taming of a Shrew. Ubi pag. 36. sic legimus:

"They wrestled togyther thus they two

So long that the clothes asunder went.

And to the ground he threwe her tho,

That cleane from the backe her smock he rent.

In every hand a rod he gate,

And layd upon her a right good pace:

Asking of her what game was that,

And she cried out, Horeson, alas, alas."

Et pag. 42.

Come downe now in this seller so deepe,

And Morels skin there shall you see:

With many a rod that hath made me to weepe,

When the blood ranne downe fast by my knee.

The Mother this beheld, and cryed out, alas:

And ran out of the seller as she had been wood.

She came to the table where the company was,

And sayd out, Horeson, I will see thy harte blood."

↵

g
It may seem little matter of wonder, that the name of Shakespeare should be borrowed for the benefit of the Bookseller; and by the way, as probably for a Play as a Poem: but modern Criticks may be surprised perhaps at the complaint of John Hall, that "certayne Chapters of the Proverbes, translated by him into English metre, 1550, had before been untruely entituled to be the doyngs of Mayster Thomas Sternhold."
↵

h

I must however correct a remark in the Life of Spenser, which is impotently levelled at the first Criticks of the age. It is observed from the correspondence of Spenser and Gabriel Harvey, that the Plan of the Fairy Queen was laid, and part of it executed in 1580, three years before the Gierusalemme Liberata was printed: "hence appears the impertinence of all the apologies for his choice of Ariosto's manner in preference to Tasso's!"

But the fact is not true with respect to Tasso. Manso and Niceron inform us, that his Poem was published, though imperfectly, in 1574; and I myself can assure the Biographer, that I have met with at least six other Editions, preceding his date for it's first publication. I suspect, that Baillet is accountable for this mistake: who in the Jugemens des Savans, Tom. 3. p. 399. mentions no Edition previous to the 4to. Venice, 1583.

It is a question of long standing, whether a part of the Fairy Queen hath been lost, or whether the work was left unfinished: which may effectually be answered by a single quotation. William Browne published some Poems in Fol. 1616, under the name of Britannia's Pastorals, "esteemed then, says Wood, to be written in a sublime strain, and for subject amorous and very pleasing."—In one of which, Book 2. Song 1. he thus speaks of Spenser:

"He sung th' heroicke Knights of Faiery land

In lines so elegant, of such command,

That had the Thracian plaid but halfe so well,

He had not left Eurydice in hell.

But e're he ended his melodious Song,

An host of Angels flew the clouds among,

And rapt this Swan from his attentive mates,

To make him one of their associates

In heauens faire Quire: where now he sings the praise

Of him that is the First and Last of Dayes."

It appears, that Browne was intimate with Drayton, Jonson, and Selden, by their poems prefixed to his Book: he had therefore good opportunities of being acquainted with the fact abovementioned. Many of his Poems remain in MS. We have in our Library at Emmanuel a Masque of his, presented at the Inner Temple, Jan. 13. 1614. The subject is the Story of Ulysses and Circe.

↵

i
Fasti. 2d Edit. V. 1.208. — It will be seen on turning to the former Edition, that the latter part of the Paragraph belongs to another Stafford. — I have since observed, that Wood is not the first, who hath given us the true Author of the Pamphlet.
↵

k
It was observed in the former Edition, that this place is not met with in Spelman's Villare, or in Adam's Index; nor, it might have been added, in the first and the last performance of this sort, Speed's Tables, and Whatley's Gazetteer: perhaps, however, it may be meant under the name of Crandon; — but the inquiry is of no importance. — It should, I think, be written Credendon; tho' better Antiquaries than Aubrey have acquiesced in the vulgar corruption.
↵

l
These people, who were the Curls of the last age, ascribe likewise to our Author those miserable Performances, Mucidorus, and the Merry Devil of Edmonton.
↵

m
Mr. Pope asserts "The troublesome Raigne of King John," in 2 parts, 1611, to have been written by Shakespeare and Rowley: — which Edition is a mere Copy of another in black Letter, 1591. But I find his assertion is somewhat to be doubted: for the old Edition hath no name of Author at all; and that of 1611, the Initials only, W. Sh. in the Title-page.
↵

n

Peele seems to have been taken into the patronage of the Earl of Northumberland about 1593, to whom he dedicates in that year, "The Honour ofthe Garter, a Poem Gratulatorie — the Firstling consecrated to his noble name." — "He was esteemed, says Anthony Wood, a most noted Poet, 1579; but when or where he died, I cannot tell, for so it is, and always hath been, that most POETS die poor, and consequently obscurely, and a hard matter it is to trace them to their Graves. Claruit 1599." Ath. Oxon. Vol. 1. p. 300.

We had lately in a periodical Pamphlet, called, The Theatrical Review, a very curious Letter under the name of George Peele, to one Master Henrie Mark; relative to a dispute between Shakespeare and Alleyn, which was compromised by Ben. Jonson. — "I never longed for thy companye more than last night; we were all verie merrie at the Globe, when Ned Alleyn did not scruple to affyrme pleasauntly to thy friende Will, that he had stolen hys speeche about the excellencie of acting in Hamlet hys Tragedye, from conversaytions manifold, whych had passed between them, and opinions gyven by Alleyn touchyng that subjecte. Shakespeare did not take this talk in good sorte; but Jonson did put an end to the stryfe wyth wittielie saying, thys affaire needeth no contentione: you stole it from Ned no doubte: do not marvel: haue you not seene hym acte tymes out of number? — This is pretended to be printed from the original MS. dated 1600; which agrees well enough with Wood's Claruit: but unluckily, Peele was dead at least two years before. "As Anacreon died by the Pot, says Meres, so George Peele by the Pox." Wit's Treasury, 1598. p. 286.

↵

o
By one Anthony Copley, 4to. black Letter, it seems to have had many Editions: perhaps the last was in 1614. — The first piece of this sort, that I have met with, was printed by T. Berthelet, tho' not mention'd by Ames, called, "Tales, and quicke answeres very mery and pleasant to rede." 4to. no date.
↵

p

It is remarked, that "Paris, tho' in one place called Earl, is most commonly stiled the Countie in this Play. Shakespeare seems to have preferred, for some reason or other, the Italian Conte to our Count:— perhaps he took it from the old English Novel, from which he is said to have taken his Plot." — He certainly did so: Paris is there first stiled a young Earle, and afterward Counte, Countee, and County; according to the unsettled Orthography of the time.

The word however is frequently met with in other Writers; particularly in Fairfax:

"As when a Captaine doth besiege some hold,

Set in a marish or high on a hill,

And trieth waies and wiles a thousand fold,

To bring the piece subjected to his will;

So far'd the Countie with the Pagan bold. &c."

Godfrey of Bulloigne. Book 7. St. 90.
"Fairfax, says Mr. Hume, hath translated Tasso with an elegance and ease, and at the same time with an exactness, which for that age are surprising. Each line in the original is faithfully rendered by a correspondent line in the translation." The former part of this character is extremely true; but the latter not quite so. In the Book above-quoted Tasso and Fairfax do not even agree in the Number of Stanza's.

↵

q

Every writer on Shakespeare hath expressed his astonishment, that his author was not solicitous to secure his Fame by a correct Edition of his performances. This matter is not understood. When a Poet was connected with a particular Playhouse, he constantly sold his Works to the Company, and it was their interest to keep them from a number of Rivals. A favourite Piece, as Heywood informs us, only got into print, when it was copied by the ear, "for a double sale would bring on a supicion of honestie." Shakespeare therefore himself published nothing in the Drama: when he left the Stage, his copies remained with his Fellow-Managers, Heminge and Condell; who at their own retirement, about seven years after the death of the Author, gave the world the Edition now known by the name of the first Folio; and call the previous publications "stolne and surreptitious, maimed and deformed by the frauds and stealths of injurious impostors." But this was printed from the Playhouse Copies; which in a series of years had been frequently altered thro' convenience, caprice, or ignorance. We have a sufficient instance of the liberties taken by the Actors, in an old pamphlet, by Nash, called Lenten Stuffe, with the Prayse of the red Herring, 4to. 1599. where he assures us, that in a Play of his, called the Isle of Dogs, "foure acts, without his consent, or the least guesse of his drift or scope, were supplied by the Players."

This however was not his first quarrel with them. In the Epistle prefixed to Greene's Arcadia, which I have quoted before, Tom. hath a lash at some "vaine glorious Tragedians," and very plainly at Shakespeare in particular; which will serve for an answer to an observation of Mr. Pope, that had almost been forgotten: "It was thought a praise to Shakespeare, that he scarce ever blotted a line: — I believe the common opinion of his want of learning proceeded from no better ground. This too might be thought a praise by some." — But hear Nash, who was far from praising: "I leaue all these to the mercy of their Mother-tongue, that feed on nought but the crums that fall from the Translator's trencher. — That could scarcely Latinize their neck verse if they should haue neede, yet English Seneca read by Candlelight yeelds many good sentences — hee will affoord you whole Hamlets, I should say, Handfuls of tragicall speeches." —I cannot determine exactly when this Epistle was first published; but, I fancy, it will carry the original Hamlet somewhat further back than we have hitherto done: and it may be observed, that the oldest Copy now extant is said to be "Enlarged to almost as much againe as it was." Gabriel Harvey printed at the end of the year 1592, "Foure Letters and certaine Sonnetts, especially touching Robert Greene:" in one of which his Arcadia is mentioned. Now Nash's Epistle must have been previous to these, as Gabriel is quoted in it with applause; and the Foure Letters were the beginning of a quarrel. Nash replied, in "Strange newes of the intercepting certaine Letters, and a Convoy of Verses, as they were going privilie to victuall the Low Countries, 1593." Harvey rejoined the same year in "Pierce's Supererogation, or a new praise of the old Asse." And Nash again, in "Have with you to Saffron-walden, or Gabriell Harvey's hunt is up; containing a full answer to the eldest Sonne of the halter-maker. 1596."

Dr. Lodge calls Nash our true English Aretine: and John Taylor, in his Kicksey Winsey, or a Lerry Come-twang, even makes an oath "by sweet Satyricke Nash his urne." — He died before 1606, as appears from an old Comedy, called, "The return from Parnassus."

↵

r
Lond. 1592, 8vo.
↵

s
Lond. 1593. 4to. Eliot is almost the only witty Grammarian, that I have had the fortune to meet with. In his Epistle prefatory to the Gentle Doctors of Gaule, he cries out for persecution, very like Jack in that most poignant of Satires, the Tale of a Tub, "I pray you be readie quickly to cauill at my booke, I beseech you heartily calumniate my doings with speede, I request you humbly controll my method as soone as you may, I earnestly entreat you hisse at my inventions, &c."
↵

t
It is indeed of no importance, but I suspect the former to be right, as I find it corrupted afterward to Lanam and Lanum.
↵

u

This Author by a pleasant mistake in some sensible Conjectures on Shakespeare lately printed at Oxford, is quoted by the name of Maister. Perhaps the Title-page was imperfect; it runs thus "Palladis Tamia. Wits Treasury. Being the second part of Wits Common-wealth, By Francis Meres Maister of Artes of both Universities."

I am glad out of gratitude to this man, who hath been of frequent service to me, that I am enabled to perfect Wood's account of him; from the assistance of our Master's very accurate List of Graduates, (which it would do honour to the University to print at the publick expense) and the kind information of a Friend from the Register of his Parish: —— He was originally of Pembroke-Hall, B. A. in 1587, and M. A. 1591. About 1602 he became Rector of Wing in Rutland; and died there, 1646, in the 81st year of his Age.

↵

x
I have quoted many pieces of John Taylor, but it was impossible to give their original dates. He may be traced as an Author for more than half a Century. His Works were collected in Folio, 1630. but many were printed afterward; I will mention one for the Humour of the Title. "Drinke and welcome, or the famous History of the most part of Drinkes in use in Greate Britain and Ireland; with an especial Declaration of the Potency, Vertue, and Operation of our English Ale: with a description of all sorts of Waters, from the Ocean Sea to the Tears of a Woman. 4to. 1633." — In Wits Merriment, or Lusty Drollery, 1656. we have an "Epitaph on John Taylor, who was born in the City of Glocester, and died in Phoenix Alley, in the 75 yeare of his age; you may find him, if the worms have not devoured him, in Covent Garden Church-yard." p. 130.— He died about two years before.
↵

y

Some inquiry hath been made for the first Performers of the capital Characters in Shakespeare.

We learn, that Burbage, the alter Roscius of Camden, was the original Richard, from a passage in the Poems of Bishop Corbet; who introduces his Host at Bosworth describing the Battle,

"But when he would have said King Richard died,

And call'd a Horse, a Horse, he Burbage cried."

The Play on this subject mentioned by Sir John Harrington in his Apologie for Poetrie, 1591, and sometimes mistaken for Shakespeare's, was a Latin one, written by Dr. Legge; and acted at St. John's in our University. some years before 1588, the date of the Copy in the Museum. This appears from a better MS. in our Library at Emmanuel, with the names of the original Performers.

It is evident from a passage in Camden's Annals, that there was an old Play likewise on the subject of Richard the second; but I know not in what language. Sir Gelley Merrick, who was concerned in the harebrained business of the Earl of Essex, and was hanged for it with the ingenious Cuffe in 1601, is accused amongst other things, "quod exoletam Tragoediam de tragicâ abdicatione Regis Ricardi secundi in publico Theatro coram Conjuratis datâ pecuniâ agi curasset."

↵

z
I cannot take my leave of Holingshed without clearing up a difficulty, which hath puzzled his Biographers. Nicholson and other Writers have supposed him a Clergyman. Tanner goes further, and tells us, that he was educated at Cambridge, and actually took the Degree of M. A. in 1544. — Yet it appears by his Will, printed by Hearne, that at the end of life he was only a Steward, or a Servant in some capacity or other, to Thomas Burdett Esq of Bromcote in Warwickshire. — These things Dr. Campbell could not reconcile. The truth is, we have no claim to the education of the Chronicler: the M. A. in 1544, was not Raphael, but one Ottiwell Holingshed, who was afterward named by the Founder one of the first Fellows of Trinity College.
↵

a
Ascham in the Epistle prefixed to his Toxophilus, 1571, observes of them, that "Manye Englishe writers, usinge straunge wordes, as Lattine, Frenche, and Italian, do make all thinges darke and harde. Ones, says he, I communed with a man which reasoned the Englishe tongue to be enriched and encreased thereby, sayinge: Who will not prayse that feast, where a man shall drincke at a dinner both wyne, ale, and beere? Truly (quoth I) they be al good, euery one taken by himselfe alone, but if you put Malmesye, and sacke, redde wyne and white, ale and beere, and al in one pot, you shall make a drinke neither easye to be knowen, nor yet holsome for the bodye."
↵

AN ESSAY ON THE LEARNING OF SHAKESPEARE.

AN ESSAY ON THE LEARNING OF SHAKESPEARE: ADDRESSED TO JOSEPH CRADOCK, Esq THE SECOND EDITION, WITH LARGE ADDITIONS.

BY RICHARD FARMER, B. D. Fellow of EMMANUEL-COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE; AND OF The Society of ANTIQUARIES, LONDON.

CAMBRIDGE: Printed by J. ARCHDEACON, Printer to the UNIVERSITY, For J. WOODYER, in Cambridge; and Sold by J. BEECROFT, in Pater-noster-Row; J. DODSLEY, in Pall-Mall; T. CADELL, in the Strand; and M. HINGESTON, near Temple Bar, London. M.DCC.LXVII.

PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION.

THE AUTHOR of the following ESSAY was sollicitous only for the honour of Shakespeare: he hath however, in his own capacity, little reason to complain of occasional Criticks, or Criticks by profession. The very FEW, who have been pleased to controvert any part of his Doctrine, have favoured him with better manners, than arguments; and claim his thanks for a further opportunity of demonstrating the futility of Theoretick reasoning against Matter of Fact. It is indeed strange, that any real Friends of our immortal POET should be still willing to force him into a situation, which is not tenable: treat him as a learned Man, and what shall excuse the most gross violations of History, Chronology, and Geography?

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is the Motto of every Polemick: like his Brethren at the Amphitheatre, he holds it a merit to die hard; and will not say, Enough, though the Battle be decided. "Were it shewn, says some one, that the old Bard borrowed all his allusions from English books then published, our Essayist might have possibly established his System." —In good time! —This had scarcely been attempted by Peter Burman himself, with the Library of Shakespeare before him. — "Truly, as Mr. Dogberry says, for mine own part, if I were as tedious as a King, I could find in my heart to bestow it all on this Subject:" but where should I meet with a Reader? — When the main Pillars are taken away, the whole Building falls in course: Nothing hath been, or can be, pointed out, which is not easily removed; or rather, which was not virtually removed before: a very little Analogy will do the business. I shall therefore have no occasion to trouble myself any further; and may venture to call my Pamphlet, in the words of a pleasant Declaimer against Sermons on the thirtieth of January, "an Answer to every thing that shall hereafter be written on the Subject."

But "this method of reasoning will prove any one ignorant of the Languages, who hath written when Translations were extant." — Shade of Burgersdicius! — does it follow, because Shakespeare's early life was incompatible with a course of Education—whose Contemporaries, Friends and Foes, nay, and himself likewise, agree in his want of what is usually called Literature —whose mistakes from equivocal Translations, and even typographical Errors, cannot possibly be accounted for otherwise, —that Locke, to whom not one of these circumstances is applicable, understood no Greek? —I suspect, Rollin's Opinion of our Philosopher was not founded on this argument.

Shakespeare wanted not the Stilts of Languages to raise him above all other men. The quotation from Lilly in the Taming of the Shrew, if indeed it be his, strongly proves the extent of his reading: had he known Terence, he would not have quoted erroneously from his Grammar. Every one hath met with men in common life, who, according to the language of the Water-poet, "got only from Possum to Posset," and yet will throw out a line occasionally from their Accidence or their Cato de Moribus with tolerable propriety. — If, however, the old Editions be trusted in this passage, our Author's memory somewhat failed him in point of Concord.

The rage of Parallelisms is almost over, and in truth nothing can be more absurd. "THIS was stolen from one Classick, — THAT from another;"— and had I not stept in to his rescue, poor Shakespeare had been stript as naked of ornament, as when he first held Horses at the door of the Playhouse.

The late ingenious and modest Mr. Dodsley declared himself ‘"Untutor'd in the lore of Greece or Rome:" ’ Yet let us take a passage at a venture from any of his performances, and a thousand to one, it is stolen. Suppose it be his celebrated Compliment to the Ladies, in one of his earliest pieces, The Toy-shop: "A good Wife makes the cares of the World sit easy, and adds a sweetness to its pleasures; she is a Man's best Companion in Prosperity, and his only Friend in Adversity; the carefullest preserver of his Health, and the kindest Attendant in his Sickness; a faithful Adviser in Distress, a Comforter in Affliction, and a prudent Manager in all his domestic Affairs."—Plainly, from a fragment of Euripides preserved by Stobaeus.

"〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉,

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉!"—

Par. 4to. 1623.

Malvolio in the Twelfth-Night of Shakespeare hath some expressions very similar to Alnaschar in the Arabian Tales: which perhaps may be sufficient for some Criticks to prove his acquaintance with Arabic!

It seems however, at last, that "Taste should determine the matter." This, as Bardolph expresses it, is a word of exceeding good command: but I am willing, that the Standard itself be somewhat better ascertained before it be opposed to demonstrative Evidence. — Upon the whole, I may consider myself, as the Pioneer of the Commentators: I have removed a deal of learned Rubbish, and pointed out to them Shakespeare's track in the ever-pleasing Paths of Nature. This was necessarily a previous Inquiry; and I hope I may assume with some confidence, what one of the first Criticks of the Age was pleased to declare on reading the former Edition, that "The Question is now for ever decided."⁂

Notes

⁂

I may just remark, lest they be mistaken for Errata, that the word Catherine in the 47th page is written, according to the old Orthography, for Catherine; and that the passage in the 51st page is copied from Upton, who improperly calls Horatio and Marcellus in Hamlet, "the Centinels."

In p. 23. l. 23. for had probably read might have &c.

↵

Information about this book

Title statement

An essay on the learning of Shakespeare: addressed to Joseph Cradock, Esq; The second edition, with large additions. By Richard Farmer, ...

Farmer, Richard, 1735-1797.

Publication

Distributor

University of Oxford Text Archive
Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road
Oxford
OX2 6NN
ota@oucs.ox.ac.uk

ID [ota]

http://ota.ox.ac.uk/id/5226

ID [isbn10]

1106022254

ID [isbn13]

9781106022257

ID [TCP]

K108999.000

ID [BIBNO]

CW3309501051

ID [ECLL]

0048001200

Availability

Distributed by the University of Oxford under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Source

— An essay on the learning of Shakespeare: addressed to Joseph Cradock, Esq; The second edition, with large additions. By Richard Farmer, ..., Farmer, Richard, 1735-1797.. [8],95,[1]p. ; 8⁰. Cambridge :: printed by J. Archdeacon, for J. Woodyer; and sold by J. Beecroft; J. Dodsley; T. Cadell; and M. Hingeston, London,. 1767.. [With a half-title and an errata slip.] [In this edition the titlepage is printed in black.] [Reproduction of original from the British Library.] [English Short Title Catalog, ESTCT138164.] [Electronic data. Farmington Hills, Mich. : Thomson Gale, 2003. Page image (PNG). Digitized image of the microfilm version produced in Woodbridge, CT by Research Publications, 1982-2002 (later known as Primary Source Microfilm, an imprint of the Gale Group).]

Creation

Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2p5.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.

Editorial practices

This electronic text file was keyed from page images and partially proofread for accuracy. Character capture and encoding have been done following the guidelines of the ECCO Text Creation Partnership, which correspond roughly to the recommendations found in Level 4 of the TEI in Libraries Guidelines. Digital page images are linked to the text file.